83 FR 32704 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 16.160 To Remove Form 19b-4(e) Filing Requirement
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 135 (July 13, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 135 (July 13, 2018)
| Page Range | 32704-32706 | |
| FR Document | 2018-14962 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 32704-32706] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-14962] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-83609; File No. SR-IEX-2018-14] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 16.160 To Remove Form 19b-4(e) Filing Requirement July 9, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on June 26, 2018, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\4\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ IEX is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to amend IEX Rule 16.160 related to derivative securities traded under unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'') to remove the requirement in Rule 16.160(a)(1) for the Exchange to file with the Commission a Form 19b-4(e) for each ``new derivative securities product'' as defined in Rule 19b-4(e) under the Act \6\ (a ``Derivative Security'') traded under UTP and renumber the remaining provisions of Rule 16.160(a) to maintain an organized rule structure. The Exchange has designated this rule change as ``non- controversial'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\ The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \5\ 17 CRF [sic] 240.19b-4. \6\ 17 CRF [sic] 240.19b-4(e). \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e) [sic]. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statement [sic] may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 16.160 related to derivative securities traded under UTP by removing the requirement in Rule 16.160(a)(1) for the Exchange to file with the Commission a Form 19b-4(e) for each Derivative Security, and renumbering the remaining rules of Rule 16.160(a) to maintain an organized rule structure, as described below. Rule 16.160(a)(1) sets forth the requirement for IEX to file with the Commission a Form 19b-4(e) with respect to each Derivative Security that is traded under UTP. However, IEX believes that it should not be necessary to file a Form 19b-4(e) with the Commission if it begins trading a Derivative Security on a UTP basis, because Rule 19b-4(e)(1) under the Act refers to the ``listing and trading'' of a ``new derivative securities product.'' The Exchange believes that the requirements of that rule refers [sic] to when an exchange lists and trades a Derivative Security, and not when an exchange seeks only to trade such product on a UTP basis pursuant to Rule 12f-2 under the Act.\9\ Therefore, IEX proposes to delete the requirement in current Rule 16.160(a)(1) for IEX to file a Form 19b-4(e) with the Commission [[Page 32705]] with respect to each Derivative Security it begins trading on a UTP basis. In addition, as a result of the deletion of current Rule 16.160(a)(1) IEX proposes to renumber current Rules 16.160(a)(2)-(6), as Rules 16.160(a)(1)-(5) respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 17 CFR 240.12f-2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6(b) \10\ of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, eliminating the requirement to file a Form 19b-4(e) for each Derivative Security the Exchange begins trading on a UTP basis removes an unnecessary regulatory requirement thereby providing for a more efficient process for adding Derivative Securities to trading on the Exchange on a UTP basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the Exchange notes that a substantially identical proposed rule change by NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE National'') was recently approved by the Commission.\12\ In particular, the Commission noted in the approval order that it ``believes that the filing of a Form 19b-4(e) is not required when an Exchange is trading a new derivative securities product on a UTP basis only'' \13\ and also found that the NYSE National's proposed rule change is ``consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.'' \14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83289 (May 17, 2018), 83 FR 23968 (May 23, 2018) (Order Approving File No. SR- NYSENAT-2018-02). \13\ See supra note 12 at page 23975. \14\ See supra note 12 at page 23976. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the renumbering of current Rules 16.160(a)(2)-(6) as Rule 11.160(a)(1)-(5), the Exchange believes that these changes are consistent with the Act because they will allow the Exchange to maintain a clear and organized rule structure, thus preventing investor confusion. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, removing the requirement to file a Form 19b-4(e) will serve to enhance competition by providing for the efficient addition of Derivative Securities for trading under UTP on IEX. To the extent that a competitor marketplace believes that the proposed rule change places it at a competitive disadvantage, it may file with the Commission a proposed rule change to adopt the same or similar rule. In addition, the proposal to renumber the current Rules 16.160(a)(2)-(6) as Rules 16.160(a)(1)-(5) does not impact competition in any respect since it merely maintains a clear and organized rule structure. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A) \15\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ thereunder. Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). \17\ As required under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange has requested a waiver of the 30-day operative delay so that the Exchange can begin trading Derivative Securities on a UTP basis without filing a Form 19b-4(e) with the Commission prior to the end of the 30-day operative delay. Because the proposed rule change is based on a rule change previously approved by the Commission \18\ and does not present any novel issues, the Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay period is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See supra note 12. \19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-IEX-2018-14 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-IEX-2018-14. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public [[Page 32706]] Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-IEX- 2018-14 and should be submitted on or before August 3, 2018. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018-14962 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![32704 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
acquired or disposed of, as the case may procedures established to achieve such Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 7 and
be. compliance. provided the Commission with the
13. Any transaction fee 14 (including For the Commission, by the Division of notice required by Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
break-up or commitment fees but Investment Management, under delegated thereunder.8 The text of the proposed
excluding broker’s fees contemplated by authority. rule change is available at the
section 17(e) or 57(k) of the Act, as Robert W. Errett, Exchange’s website at
applicable) received in connection with Deputy Secretary. www.iextrading.com, at the principal
a Co-Investment Transaction will be office of the Exchange, and at the
[FR Doc. 2018–14963 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
distributed to the participating Commission’s Public Reference Room.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
on a pro rata basis based on the amounts Statement of the Purpose of, and the
they invested or committed, as the case SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
may be, in such Co-Investment COMMISSION Change
Transaction. If any transaction fee is to
In its filing with the Commission, the
be held by an AB–PCI Adviser pending [Release No. 34–83609; File No. SR–IEX– self-regulatory organization included
consummation of the transaction, the 2018–14]
statements concerning the purpose of
fee will be deposited into an account and basis for the proposed rule change
maintained by such AB–PCI Adviser at Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of and discussed any comments it received
a bank or banks having the on the proposed rule change. The text
qualifications prescribed in section Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule of these statement [sic] may be
26(a)(1) of the Act, and the account will examined at the places specified in Item
earn a competitive rate of interest that 16.160 To Remove Form 19b–4(e)
Filing Requirement IV below. The self-regulatory
will also be divided pro rata among the organization has prepared summaries,
participating Regulated Funds and July 9, 2018. set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
Affiliated Funds based on the amounts of the most significant aspects of such
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
they invest in such Co-Investment statements.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2 and
Transaction. None of the Affiliated
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Funds, the AB–PCI Advisers, the other
hereby given that, on June 26, 2018, the Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Regulated Funds or any affiliated person
Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’ or Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
of the Regulated Funds or Affiliated
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities Change
Funds will receive additional
and Exchange Commission
compensation or remuneration of any 1. Purpose
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
kind as a result of or in connection with
change as described in Items I and II The purpose of the proposed rule
a Co-Investment Transaction (other than
below, which Items have been prepared change is to amend Rule 16.160 related
(a) in the case of the Regulated Funds
by the self-regulatory organization. The to derivative securities traded under
and the Affiliated Funds, the pro rata
Commission is publishing this notice to UTP by removing the requirement in
transaction fees described above and
solicit comments on the proposed rule Rule 16.160(a)(1) for the Exchange to
fees or other compensation described in
change from interested persons. file with the Commission a Form 19b–
Condition 2(c)(iii)(C); and (b) in the case
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 4(e) for each Derivative Security, and
of an AB–PCI Adviser, investment
Statement of the Terms of Substance of renumbering the remaining rules of Rule
advisory fees paid in accordance with
16.160(a) to maintain an organized rule
the agreement between the AB–PCI the Proposed Rule Change
structure, as described below.
Adviser and the Regulated Fund or Pursuant to the provisions of Section Rule 16.160(a)(1) sets forth the
Affiliated Fund). 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange requirement for IEX to file with the
14. If the Holders own in the aggregate Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),4 and Rule 19b–4 Commission a Form 19b–4(e) with
more than 25 percent of the Shares of thereunder,5 IEX is filing with the respect to each Derivative Security that
a Regulated Fund, then the Holders will Commission a proposed rule change to is traded under UTP. However, IEX
vote such Shares as directed by an amend IEX Rule 16.160 related to believes that it should not be necessary
independent third party when voting derivative securities traded under to file a Form 19b–4(e) with the
on: (1) The election of directors; (2) the unlisted trading privileges (‘‘UTP’’) to Commission if it begins trading a
removal of one or more directors; or (3) remove the requirement in Rule Derivative Security on a UTP basis,
any other matter under either the Act or 16.160(a)(1) for the Exchange to file because Rule 19b–4(e)(1) under the Act
applicable State law affecting the with the Commission a Form 19b–4(e) refers to the ‘‘listing and trading’’ of a
Board’s composition, size or manner of for each ‘‘new derivative securities ‘‘new derivative securities product.’’
election. product’’ as defined in Rule 19b–4(e) The Exchange believes that the
15. Each Regulated Fund’s chief under the Act 6 (a ‘‘Derivative Security’’) requirements of that rule refers [sic] to
compliance officer, as defined in rule traded under UTP and renumber the when an exchange lists and trades a
38a–1(a)(4), will prepare an annual remaining provisions of Rule 16.160(a) Derivative Security, and not when an
report for its Board each year that to maintain an organized rule structure. exchange seeks only to trade such
evaluates (and documents the basis of The Exchange has designated this rule product on a UTP basis pursuant to Rule
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
that evaluation) the Regulated Fund’s change as ‘‘non-controversial’’ under 12f–2 under the Act.9 Therefore, IEX
compliance with the terms and proposes to delete the requirement in
conditions of the application and the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). current Rule 16.160(a)(1) for IEX to file
2 15 U.S.C. 78a. a Form 19b–4(e) with the Commission
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
14 Applicants are not requesting and the staff is
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
not providing any relief for transaction fees
5 17 CRF [sic] 240.19b–4. 8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(e) [sic].
received in connection with any Co-Investment
Transaction. 6 17 CRF [sic] 240.19b–4(e). 9 17 CFR 240.12f–2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Jul 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32839/page/1.svg)
![32706 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, not ask respondents to identify imported from abroad for temporary
Washington, DC 20549, on official themselves except by NAICS Code. The exhibition within the United States, are
business days between the hours of form asks whether the event provided of cultural significance. The objects are
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such practical information which allowed imported pursuant to loan agreements
filing will also be available for them to manage their businesses more with the foreign owners or custodians.
inspection and copying at the principal effectively and efficiently and gave them I also determine that the exhibition or
office of the Exchange. All comments a good working knowledge of the display of the exhibit objects at The
received will be posted without change. subject. It asks whether the program was Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
Persons submitting comments are sufficient. It asks whether each speaker New York, from on or about September
cautioned that we do not redact or edit was well-organized, interesting, 17, 2018, until on or about January 6,
personal identifying information from presented information at the appropriate 2019, and at possible additional
comment submissions. You should level, and communicated well. It asks exhibitions or venues yet to be
submit only information that you wish for suggestions for improvement, and for determined, is in the national interest.
to make available publicly. All ideas for new topics. I have ordered that Public Notice of
submissions should refer to File No. The form asks some demographic these determinations be published in
SR–IEX–2018–14 and should be information so that SBA can better the Federal Register.
submitted on or before August 3, 2018. understand the community which these FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
For the Commission, by the Division of events serve. Where the event relates to Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated government contracting, it asks whether the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
authority.21 the respondent has taken advantage of State (telephone: 202–632–6471; email:
Robert W. Errett, various government contracting section2459@state.gov). The mailing
Deputy Secretary. programs which SBA offers. address is U.S. Department of State,
SBA may also use this form to help L/PD, SA–5, Suite 5H03, Washington,
[FR Doc. 2018–14962 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
evaluate programs which it conducts by DC 20522–0505.
BILLING CODE P
itself. Responding to the questionnaire SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
is entirely voluntary. foregoing determinations were made
Solicitation of Public Comments pursuant to the authority vested in me
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat.
SBA is requesting comments on (a) 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of
Data Collection Available for Public Whether the collection of information is
Comments March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs
necessary for the agency to properly Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998
60-Day notice and request for
ACTION: perform its functions; (b) whether the (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501
comments. burden estimates are accurate; (c) note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority
whether there are ways to minimize the No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation
SUMMARY: The Small Business burden, including through the use of of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28,
Administration (SBA) intends to request automated techniques or other forms of 2000, and Delegation of Authority No.
approval, from the Office of information technology; and (d) whether 236–10 of July 6, 2018.
Management and Budget (OMB) for the there are ways to enhance the quality,
collection of information described utility, and clarity of the information. Jennifer Z. Galt,
below. The Paperwork Reduction Act Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Summary of Information Collection Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
(PRA) of 1995, requires federal agencies
to publish a notice in the Federal Title: Outreach Event Survey. of State.
Register concerning each proposed Description of Respondents: Those [FR Doc. 2018–15025 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
collection of information before who attend events which SBA BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
submission to OMB, and to allow 60 cosponsors with other organizations.
days for public comment in response to Form Number: 20.
the notice. This notice complies with Total Estimated Annual Responses: DEPARTMENT OF STATE
such requirements. 90,600. [Public Notice: 10461]
DATES: Submit comments on or before
Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden:
September 11, 2018. 3,020. Notice of Determinations; Culturally
ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Curtis Rich, Significant Objects Imported for
Stephen Morris, Director, Office of Management Analyst.
Exhibition—Determinations: ‘‘Keir
Strategic Alliances, Small Business Collection of Art of the Islamic World’’
[FR Doc. 2018–15022 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
Administration, 409 3rd Street, Exhibitions
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
Washington, DC 20416. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following determinations: I hereby
Stephen Morris, 202–205–7422, DEPARTMENT OF STATE determine that two objects to be
Stephen.morris@sba.gov, or Curtis B. included in exhibitions of the Keir
Rich, SBA PRA Officer, 202–205–7030, [Public Notice: 10462] Collection of Art of the Islamic World,
curtis.rich@sba.gov. re-imported from abroad for temporary
Notice of Determinations; Culturally
exhibition within the United States, are
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This form
Significant Objects Imported for
is a three-page questionnaire, Exhibition—Determinations: of cultural significance. The objects are
principally in checklist form, designed ‘‘Delacroix’’ Exhibition re-imported pursuant to a loan
to give SBA feedback from those who agreement with the foreign owner or
attend events which SBA cosponsors SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the custodian. I also determine that the
with other organizations. The form does following determinations: I hereby exhibition or display of the first object
determine that certain objects to be at the Dallas Museum of Art, in Dallas,
21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). included in the exhibition ‘‘Delacroix,’’ Texas, and at possible additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Jul 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32839/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-07-13 01:04:28
Document Modified: 2018-07-13 01:04:28
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 32704 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR