83_FR_34253 83 FR 34114 - Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

83 FR 34114 - Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 139 (July 19, 2018)

Page Range34114-34115
FR Document2018-15566

On July 9, 2018, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) entered final judgment sustaining the final results of the remand redetermination by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) investigation of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe (CWP) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in the AD investigation of CWP from the UAE.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34114-34115]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-807]


Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab 
Emirates: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On July 9, 2018, the United States Court of International 
Trade (the Court) entered final judgment sustaining the final results 
of the remand redetermination by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) investigation of circular 
welded carbon-quality steel pipe (CWP) from the United Arab Emirates 
(UAE). Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this 
case is not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in the AD 
investigation of CWP from the UAE.

DATES: Applicable July 19, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Wiltse and Whitley Herndon, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6345 and (202) 
482-6274, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Subsequent to the October 28, 2016, publication of the Final 
Determination,\1\ and the December 16, 2016, publication of the 
Order,\2\ Wheatland Tube Company (i.e., the petitioner), filed a 
complaint with the Court challenging Commerce's treatment of the cost 
of ``caps'' used by Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, LLC--Jebel 
Ali Branch (UTP-JA), a producer/exporter of the mandatory respondent, 
Universal.\3\ On April 24, 2018, the Court remanded Commerce's final 
determination with the instruction that Commerce reexamine whether UTP-
JA's cost of caps should be treated as packing expenses in light of its 
prior treatment of this material.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the 
United Arab Emirates: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, 81 FR 75030 (October 28, 2016) (Final Determination).
    \2\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the 
Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates: Amended 
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping 
Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December 19, 2016) (Order).
    \3\ Universal is the name collectively used for the following 
group of affiliated producers/exporters of CWP: KHK Scaffolding and 
Framework LLC; Universal Tube and Pipe Industries, Ltd; and UTP-JA.
    \4\ See Wheatland Tube Company v. United States, Court No. 17-
00021, Slip Op. 18-49 (CIT April 24, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 22, 2018, Commerce issued its final results of 
redetermination, in which we reclassified UTP-JA's cost of caps as 
packing expenses; this revision did not change the final dumping margin 
for Universal.\5\ On July 9, 2018, the Court sustained the Remand 
Redetermination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Wheatland Tube Company v. United States, Court No. 17-00021, 
Slip Op. 18-49 (CIT April 24, 2018), dated June 21, 2018, available 
at: https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/index.html (Remand 
Redetermination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\6\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\7\ 
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

[[Page 34115]]

Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a court 
decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and 
must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court 
decision. The Court's July 9, 2018, final judgment sustaining 
Commerce's Remand Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the 
Court that is not in harmony with Commerce's Final Determination. This 
notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
Timken. Accordingly, Commerce will continue the suspension of 
liquidation of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the 
period of appeal, or if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court 
decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. 
Cir. 1990) (Timken).
    \7\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have not amended the Final Determination because reclassifying 
UTP-JA's cost of caps as packing expenses did not result in a change to 
the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Universal in the 
Final Determination, which remains 5.58 percent.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c)(1) and (e), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

     Dated: July 13, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-15566 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                34114                          Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 139 / Thursday, July 19, 2018 / Notices

                                                                                      Subsidy rate       with the regulations and terms of an                  DATES:   Applicable July 19, 2018.
                                                         Company                       (percent)         APO is a sanctionable violation.                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                           These final results are issued and                  Blaine Wiltse and Whitley Herndon,
                                                Borusan Istikbal Ticaret         0.78 ad valorem.        published in accordance with sections                 AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
                                                  and Borusan                                            751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
                                                  Mannesmann Boru
                                                                                                                                                               Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                  Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.6.
                                                                                                         CFR 351.221(b)(5).                                    International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                           Dated: July 12, 2018.                               U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                Assessment Rates                                         Gary Taverman,                                        Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
                                                                                                         Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                                                                                                                                               DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6345
                                                   In accordance with 19 CFR                                                                                   and (202) 482–6274, respectively.
                                                351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to                       and Countervailing Duty Operations,
                                                                                                         performing the non-exclusive functions and            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                issue appropriate instructions to U.S.
                                                                                                         duties of the Assistant Secretary for
                                                Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15                                                                         Background
                                                                                                         Enforcement and Compliance.
                                                days after the date of publication of the                                                                         Subsequent to the October 28, 2016,
                                                final results of this review. Commerce                   Appendix                                              publication of the Final Determination,1
                                                will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments                 List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and            and the December 16, 2016, publication
                                                of subject merchandise produced and/or                   Decision Memorandum                                   of the Order,2 Wheatland Tube
                                                exported by the company listed above,                    I. Summary                                            Company (i.e., the petitioner), filed a
                                                entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                    II. Background                                        complaint with the Court challenging
                                                for consumption, from March 20, 2015,                    III. Scope of the Order                               Commerce’s treatment of the cost of
                                                through December 31, 2015, at the ad                     IV. Subsidies Valuation                               ‘‘caps’’ used by Universal Tube and
                                                valorem rate listed above.                                  A. Allocation Period                               Plastic Industries, LLC—Jebel Ali
                                                                                                            B. Attribution of Subsides                         Branch (UTP–JA), a producer/exporter
                                                Cash Deposit Requirements                                   C. Benchmark Interest Rates                        of the mandatory respondent,
                                                  Commerce also intends to instruct                      V. Programs Determined To Be
                                                                                                                                                               Universal.3 On April 24, 2018, the Court
                                                CBP to collect cash deposits of                                Countervailable
                                                                                                         VI. Programs Determined Not To Be Used                remanded Commerce’s final
                                                estimated countervailing duties in the                                                                         determination with the instruction that
                                                amount shown above for Borusan, on                             During the POR
                                                                                                         VII. Analysis of Comments                             Commerce reexamine whether UTP–
                                                shipments of subject merchandise                                                                               JA’s cost of caps should be treated as
                                                                                                            Comment 1: Treatment of the Investment
                                                entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                          Encouragement Program (IEP): Customs            packing expenses in light of its prior
                                                for consumption on or after the date of                        and Value Added Tax (VAT) Exemption             treatment of this material.4
                                                publication of the final results of this                       Program                                            On June 22, 2018, Commerce issued
                                                review. For all non-reviewed firms,                         Comment 2: Whether To Include Borusan’s            its final results of redetermination, in
                                                Commerce will instruct CBP to continue                         Exchange Variation Income in the Total          which we reclassified UTP–JA’s cost of
                                                to collect cash deposits at the most                           Value of Sales and Total Value of Export        caps as packing expenses; this revision
                                                recent company-specific or all-others                          Sales
                                                                                                         VIII. Recommendation
                                                                                                                                                               did not change the final dumping
                                                rate applicable to the company, as                                                                             margin for Universal.5 On July 9, 2018,
                                                appropriate. Accordingly, the cash                       [FR Doc. 2018–15435 Filed 7–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                               the Court sustained the Remand
                                                deposit requirements that will be                        BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                Redetermination.
                                                applied to companies covered by this
                                                order, but not examined in this                                                                                Timken Notice
                                                administrative review, are those                         DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  In its decision in Timken,6 as clarified
                                                established in the most recently                                                                               by Diamond Sawblades,7 the United
                                                completed segment of the proceeding                      International Trade Administration                    States Court of Appeals for the Federal
                                                for each company. These cash deposit                     [A–520–807]
                                                requirements, when imposed, shall                                                                                 1 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe

                                                remain in effect until further notice.                   Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel                  from the United Arab Emirates: Final Determination
                                                                                                                                                               of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 75030
                                                Administrative Protective Orders                         Pipe From the United Arab Emirates:                   (October 28, 2016) (Final Determination).
                                                                                                         Notice of Court Decision Not in                          2 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
                                                  This notice also serves as a reminder                  Harmony With Final Determination of                   from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the
                                                to parties subject to administrative                     Sales at Less Than Fair Value                         United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative
                                                protective order (APO) of their                                                                                Antidumping Duty Determination and
                                                responsibility concerning the                            AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                 Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December
                                                                                                                                                               19, 2016) (Order).
                                                destruction of proprietary information                   International Trade Administration,                      3 Universal is the name collectively used for the
                                                disclosed under APO in accordance                        Department of Commerce.                               following group of affiliated producers/exporters of
                                                with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely                        SUMMARY: On July 9, 2018, the United                  CWP: KHK Scaffolding and Framework LLC;
                                                written notification of the return or                                                                          Universal Tube and Pipe Industries, Ltd; and UTP–
                                                                                                         States Court of International Trade (the              JA.
                                                destruction of APO materials or                          Court) entered final judgment sustaining                 4 See Wheatland Tube Company v. United States,
                                                conversion to judicial protective order is               the final results of the remand                       Court No. 17–00021, Slip Op. 18–49 (CIT April 24,
                                                hereby requested. Failure to comply                      redetermination by the Department of                  2018).
                                                                                                                                                                  5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
                                                                                                         Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the
                                                  6 For the Borusan Companies, we initiated on the                                                             to Court Remand, Wheatland Tube Company v.
                                                                                                         antidumping duty (AD) investigation of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                following: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret (Istikbal) and                                                             United States, Court No. 17–00021, Slip Op. 18–49
                                                Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
                                                                                                         circular welded carbon-quality steel                  (CIT April 24, 2018), dated June 21, 2018, available
                                                (BMB). As explained in the PDM, we found Istikbal        pipe (CWP) from the United Arab                       at: https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/
                                                and BMB to be cross-owned under Borusan                  Emirates (UAE). Commerce is notifying                 index.html (Remand Redetermination).
                                                                                                                                                                  6 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
                                                Holding, A.S. No party has provided argument to          the public that the final judgment in this
                                                the contrary; thus, for these final results, we                                                                341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
                                                continue to find all three companies to be cross-
                                                                                                         case is not in harmony with Commerce’s                   7 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.

                                                owned, though only BMB received countervailable          final determination in the AD                         United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
                                                subsidies in this review period.                         investigation of CWP from the UAE.                    (Diamond Sawblades).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:34 Jul 18, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM   19JYN1


                                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 139 / Thursday, July 19, 2018 / Notices                                                                34115

                                                Circuit held that, pursuant to section                       DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                        Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
                                                516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                                                                                      Centralized Electronic Service System
                                                amended (the Act), Commerce must                             International Trade Administration                            (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
                                                publish a notice of a court decision that                    [C–570–048]                                                   registered users at http://
                                                is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce                                                                                      access.trade.gov, and is available to all
                                                determination and must suspend                               Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-                        parties in the Central Records Unit,
                                                liquidation of entries pending a                             Length Plate From the People’s                                Room B8024 of the main Department of
                                                ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The                           Republic of China: Final Results of                           Commerce building. In addition, a
                                                Court’s July 9, 2018, final judgment                         Countervailing Duty Expedited Review                          complete version of the Issues and
                                                sustaining Commerce’s Remand                                                                                               Decision Memorandum can be accessed
                                                                                                             AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                         directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
                                                Redetermination constitutes a final                          International Trade Administration,
                                                decision of the Court that is not in                                                                                       frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
                                                                                                             Department of Commerce.                                       Memorandum and the electronic
                                                harmony with Commerce’s Final                                SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                           version are identical in content.
                                                Determination. This notice is published                      (Commerce) has completed its
                                                in fulfillment of the publication                            expedited review of the countervailing                        Scope of the Order
                                                requirements of Timken. Accordingly,                         duty (CVD) order on certain carbon and                           The product covered by this order is
                                                Commerce will continue the suspension                        alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL                          CTL plate. A full description of the
                                                of liquidation of the subject                                plate) from the People’s Republic of                          scope of the order is contained in the
                                                merchandise pending the expiration of                        China (China) and finds that Jiangsu                          Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
                                                the period of appeal, or if appealed,                        Tiangong Tools Company Limited (TG
                                                pending a final and conclusive court                         Tools) received countervailable                               Methodology
                                                decision.                                                    subsidies during period of review (POR)                         Commerce conducted this CVD
                                                                                                             January 1, 2015, through December 31,                         expedited review in accordance with 19
                                                   We have not amended the Final                             2015.
                                                Determination because reclassifying                                                                                        CFR 351.214(k). For a full description of
                                                                                                             DATES: Applicable July 19, 2018.                              the methodology underlying our
                                                UTP–JA’s cost of caps as packing
                                                expenses did not result in a change to                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                              conclusions, see the Issues and Decision
                                                                                                             Ryan Mullen, AD/CVD Operations,                               Memorandum. The subsidy programs
                                                the weighted-average dumping margin
                                                                                                             Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,                         under review, and the issues raised in
                                                calculated for Universal in the Final
                                                                                                             International Trade Administration,                           the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
                                                Determination, which remains 5.58                            U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401                             the parties, are discussed in the Issues
                                                percent.                                                     Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,                           and Decision Memorandum. A list of
                                                Notification to Interested Parties                           DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5260.                          the issues that parties raised, and to
                                                                                                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                    which we responded in the Issues and
                                                   This notice is issued and published in                                                                                  Decision Memorandum, is attached as
                                                accordance with sections 516A(c)(1) and                      Background                                                    an Appendix to this notice.
                                                (e), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.                                  Commerce published the Preliminary                           Based on our review and analysis of
                                                  Dated: July 13, 2018.
                                                                                                             Results of this expedited review on                           the comments received from parties, we
                                                                                                             March 21, 2018.1 A summary of the                             made certain changes to TG Tools’
                                                Gary Taverman,                                               events that occurred since we published                       subsidy rate calculations since the
                                                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping                   the Preliminary Results, as well as a full                    Preliminary Results. For a discussion of
                                                and Countervailing Duty Operations,                          discussion of the issues raised by parties                    these changes, see the Issues and
                                                performing the non-exclusive functions and                   for the final results, may be found in the                    Decision Memorandum and the Final
                                                duties of the Assistant Secretary for                        Issues and Decision Memorandum 2                              Calculation Memorandum.4
                                                Enforcement and Compliance.
                                                                                                             issued concurrently with, and hereby
                                                [FR Doc. 2018–15566 Filed 7–18–18; 8:45 am]                  adopted by, this notice. The Issues and                       Final Results of the Expedited Review
                                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                       Decision Memorandum is a public                                 As a result of this expedited review,
                                                                                                             document and is on file electronically                        we determine the countervailable
                                                                                                             via Enforcement and Compliance’s                              subsidy rate to be:

                                                                                                                          Company                                                                                   Subsidy rate

                                                Jiangsu Tiangong Tools Company Limited, Tiangong Aihe Company Limited, Jiangsu Tiangong Group Company Limited,
                                                   Jiangsu Tiangong Mould Steel R&D Center Company Limited ......................................................................................................   26.90 percent



                                                Cash Deposit Instructions                                    results, Commerce will instruct Customs                       withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                                                                             and Border Protection (CBP) to collect                        consumption on or after the date of
                                                  Pursuant to section 19 CFR                                 cash deposits of estimated                                    publication of the final results of this
                                                351.214(k)(3)(iii), the final results of this                countervailing duties for the companies                       expedited review. These cash deposit
                                                expedited review will not be the basis                       subject to this expedited review, at the                      requirements, when imposed, shall
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                for the assessment of countervailing                         rates shown above, on shipments of                            remain in effect until further notice.
                                                duties. Upon the issuance of these final                     subject merchandise entered, or
                                                  1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-                 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision                     with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
                                                Length Plate from the People’s Republic of China:            Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited                 Decision Memorandum).
                                                Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty                   Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain              3 Id.

                                                Expedited Review, 83 FR 12337 (March 21, 2018)               Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the             4 Id; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results

                                                (Preliminary Results).                                       People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently              Calculations for TG Tools’’ (June 13, 2018).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014     17:34 Jul 18, 2018   Jkt 244001    PO 00000    Frm 00018     Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703    E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM       19JYN1



Document Created: 2018-07-19 01:35:35
Document Modified: 2018-07-19 01:35:35
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable July 19, 2018.
ContactBlaine Wiltse and Whitley Herndon, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6345 and (202) 482-6274, respectively.
FR Citation83 FR 34114 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR