83 FR 3636 - Revisions to Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 18 (January 26, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 18 (January 26, 2018)
| Page Range | 3636-3656 | |
| FR Document | 2018-00470 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 3636-3656] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-00470] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510; FRL-9972-22-OAR] RIN 2060-AS95 Revisions to Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This action proposes corrections and updates to regulations for source testing of emissions. The proposed rule includes corrections to testing provisions that contain inaccuracies, updates to outdated procedures, and approved alternative procedures that provide testers enhanced flexibility. The revisions will improve the quality of data but will not impose new substantive requirements on source owners or operators. DATES: Comments. Written comments must be received by March 27, 2018. Public Hearing. The EPA will hold a public hearing on this rule if requested. Requests for a hearing must be made by February 5, 2018. Requests for a hearing should be made to Mrs. Lula H. Melton via email at [email protected] or by phone at (919) 541-2910. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on February 26, 2018 at EPA Headquarters, William Jefferson Clinton East Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ- OAR-2016-0510 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed on the website, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room 3334, EPA WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-1742. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143- 02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplementary information in this preamble is organized as follows: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? B. What action is the agency taking? II. Background III. Summary of Proposed Amendments A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51 B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51 C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51 [[Page 3637]] D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60 E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60 F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60 G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db) Part 60 H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60 I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60 J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60 K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60 L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60 M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60 Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60 R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60 S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60 T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60 X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60 Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60 Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60 AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60 BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60 CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60 DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63 EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63 FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63 GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart UUUUU) Part 63 HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63 II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63 JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63 KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63 LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63 MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63 IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51 K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? The proposed amendments apply to industries that are subject to the current provisions of parts 51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the specific affected industries or their North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes herein since there are many affected sources in numerous NAICS categories. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13. B. What action is the agency taking? This action makes corrections and revisions to source test methods, performance specifications (PS), quality assurance/quality control (QA/ QC) procedures, and testing regulations. The corrections and revisions consist primarily of typographical errors, updates to testing procedures, and the addition of alternative equipment and methods the Agency has deemed acceptable to use. II. Background The EPA catalogs errors and corrections, as well as necessary revisions to test methods, PS, QA/QC procedures, and associated regulations in 40 CFR parts 51, 60, and 63 and periodically updates and revises these provisions. The most recent updates and revisions were promulgated on August 30, 2016 (81 FR 59800). This proposed rule addresses necessary corrections and revisions identified subsequent to that final action, many of which were brought to our attention by regulated sources and end-users, such as environmental consultants and compliance professionals. These revisions will improve the quality of data obtained and give source testers the flexibility to use newly- approved alternative procedures. III. Summary of Proposed Amendments The following amendments are being proposed. A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51 In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the denominator of equation 24 would be corrected. B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51 In Method 204, in section 8.2, the statement regarding equation 204-2 would be corrected to ``The NEAR must be <=0.05.'' C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51 In Method 205, section 2.1.1 would be revised to allow the use of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable transfer standards to calibrate the gas dilution system because these standards are widely available and provide the accuracy necessary to perform the calibration. Section 2.1.1 would also be revised to require testers to report the results of the calibration of the dilution system to enable the regulatory authority to review this information. D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60 In the General Provisions of part 60, section 60.17(h) would be revised to add American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D6216- 12 to the list of incorporations by reference and to re-number the remaining consensus standards that are incorporated by reference in alpha-numeric order. E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60 In subpart D, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.46(b)(2)(i) would be revised from 16014 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60 In subpart Da, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db) Part 60 In subpart Db, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.46b(d)(4) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. [[Page 3638]] H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60 In subpart Dc, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.45c(a)(5) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction Is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60 In subpart Ea, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.58a(b)(3) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60 In subpart CC, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.293(f) would be revised from 120 14 [deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable particulate matter (PM) measurements. The allowed filter temperature in section 60.296(d)(2) would be revised from 177 14 [deg]C to 177 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces Part 60 In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH, in section 13.5.1, equation 8 would be corrected. L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60 In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the definition of ambient carbon dioxide concentration would be revised because the global monthly mean (CO 2 )a concentration varies over time. Also, a website link would be added to the definition. M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 The allowed filter temperature in Method 5, sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 would be revised from 12014 [deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. Section 6.1.1.9 would be revised to allow the use of a single temperature sensor in lieu of two temperature sensors on the dry gas meter as allowed by Technical Information Document 19 (TID-19) and the approved broadly applicable alternative, ALT-117 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc). N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 The allowed filter temperature in Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and 8.2 would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. Section 11.0 would be revised to replace the reference to Method 5, section 11.0 with specific analytical procedures and to report the results using Figure 5B-1 for complete data review. Section 17.0 would be revised to delete the word ``Reserved'' from the title, and Figure 5B-1 (Analytical Data Sheet) would be added. O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60 In Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 would be revised to tighten the allowed filter temperature from 120 14 [deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60 In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 reference erroneous sections; the correct sections would be inserted. Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60 In Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 would be renumbered to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1 would be added to clarify the requirements that apply to the probe nozzle; and Figure 8-1 (Sulfuric Acid Sampling Train) would be corrected. R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60 In Method 18, in section 13.1, the erroneous paragraph (c) designation would be re-designated as (b). S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60 In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 would be revised to allow digital photography to be used for a subset of the recordkeeping requirements. Section 11.2.3 would be added to allow digital photographic records. Note that ALT-109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc) is the associated broadly applicable alternative that allows the use of digital photographs for specific recordkeeping requirements. T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 In Method 26, section 6.2.2 would be revised to allow the use of glass sample storage containers as an option to allow flexibility and to be consistent with Method 26A. U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 In Method 26A, section 6.2.1 would be revised to remove the language regarding sample storage containers. We have determined that high-density polyethylene is an acceptable material for sample storage containers in addition to the currently allowed glass. Therefore, we would allow both high-density polyethylene and glass in a new section 6.2.4. V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60 In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in section 13.5.1 would be corrected. W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 1, references to ASTM D6216-98 (in sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 reference 8. will be replaced with ASTM D6216-12. Note: If the initial certification of the continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) has already occurred using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it will not be necessary to recertify using D6216-12. X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 2, section 13.2 would be replaced with a table that indicates the relative accuracy performance specifications. Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 3, the two sentences in section 12.0 that read, ``Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine (or more) data sets constitute the RA.'' would be deleted; these two sentences are no longer necessary since equations 3-1 and 3-2 would be moved from section 13.2 to section 12.0. Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 11, section 13.1, the word ``average'' erroneously exists in the second sentence and would be deleted. AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 15, section 13.0 would be added as ``Method Performance (Reserved).'' BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60 In Performance Specification 18, in section 11.8.7, the last sentence would [[Page 3639]] be revised to clarify the duration of the drift check. In Table 1, the erroneous acronym ``NO 2 '' would be replaced with ``NO.'' In the appendix of Performance Specification 18, the inadvertently omitted reserved section 12.0 would be added. CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60 In Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence immediately following the table that reads, ``Challenge the CEMS three times at each audit point, and use the average of the three responses in determining accuracy.'' would be replaced with, ``Inject each of the audit gases, three times each for a total of six injections. Inject the gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not inject the same gas concentration twice in succession.'' In section 5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA's traceability protocol for gaseous calibration standards would be updated, and the language regarding the use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit gases would be clarified. DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63 Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and 63.8(e)(5)(i) of the General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63 would be revised to require the reporting of specific test data for continuous monitoring system performance evaluation tests and ongoing QA tests. These data elements would be required regardless of the format of the report, i.e., electronic or paper. These modifications will ensure that performance evaluation and quality assurance test reporting include all data necessary for the compliance authority to assess and assure the quality of the reported data and that the reported information describes and identifies the specific unit covered by the evaluation test report. EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63 In subpart NNN, the allowed filter temperature in Sec. 63.1385(a)(5) would be revised from 12014 [deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63 In Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f. would be revised to allow the use of EPA SW-846-7471B (for liquid samples) in addition to EPA SW-846- 7470A for measuring mercury to allow flexibility. GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart UUUUU) Part 63 In subpart UUUUU, the allowed filter temperature in Sec. 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM measurements. In Table 5, Method 5I would be allowed as a test method option because Method 5I is designed for low PM application. HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63 In Method 303, section 12.4, equation 303-3 would be corrected by inserting ``where y = '' in front of the equation. II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63 In Method 308, deionized distilled water would replace the aqueous n-proponal solution; the affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2, 7.2.3.3, and 11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines the aqueous n-proponal solution, would be removed. Section 8.1.2 would be revised to require a leak check prior to the sampling run (in addition to after the sampling run) for QA purposes; requiring a leak check prior to the sampling run would potentially save time and money. In section 9.1, methanol spike recovery check would be added as a QC measure in Table 9.1. In section 12.1, variables used in equations 308-4 and 308-5 would be added and section 12.5, which includes equations 308-4 and 308-5, would be added. In section 13.0, the title ``Reserved'' would be replaced with ``Method Performance'' and QA requirements would be added to be consistent with other methods. JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63 In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in equation 2 would be corrected from P SS to PS . In section 9.2.3, the word ``where'' in the statement ``Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as follows: where:'' would be deleted. Also in section 9.2.3, ``dir'' on the definition of spike is inadvertently superscripted and would be subscripted. KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63 In Method 323, section 12.9, the denominator in equation 323-8 would be corrected. LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63 In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 would be revised to clarify that only one extra sampling site is required near known sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when the source is within 50 meters of the boundary and the source is located between two monitors. The label under Figure 8.1 would be corrected from Refinery (20% angle) to Refinery (20[deg] angle). Section 8.2.3.2 would be revised to include facilities with a monitoring perimeter length equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet). Section 8.2.3.3 would be added to provide clarification and an equivalent procedure in Option 2 (linear distance between sites) for site locations that parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1 (radial distance between sites). MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63 In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 would be revised to correct an error in the number of field blank samples required for a sampling period and to provide consistency with the sample analysis required in Method 325B. In sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section 10.6.3 would be corrected to 10.0. Also in section 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section 10.9.5 would be corrected to 9.13. Section 12.2.2 would be revised to correct the calculation of target compound concentrations at standard conditions. Sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 would be deleted because the equations for target concentrations are incorrect. Table 17-1 would be revised to add inadvertently omitted QC criteria from section 9.3.3. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs This action is expected to be an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory action. This proposed rule is expected to provide meaningful burden reduction by improving data quality and providing source testers the flexibility to use newly-approved alternative procedures. [[Page 3640]] C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA. The amendments being proposed in this action to the test methods, performance specifications, and testing regulations do not substantively revise the existing information collection requirements but rather only make corrections and minor updates to existing testing methodology. In addition, the proposed amendments clarify performance testing requirements. D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small entities subject to the rule. This proposed rule will not impose emission measurement requirements beyond those specified in the current regulations, nor does it change any emission standard. We have, therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory burden for all directly regulated small entities. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. This action would correct and update existing testing regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51 This action involves technical standards. The EPA proposes to use ASTM D6216-12 for continuous opacity monitors in Performance Specification 1. The ASTM D6216-12 standard covers the procedure for certifying continuous opacity monitors and includes design and performance specifications, test procedures, and QA requirements to ensure that continuous opacity monitors meet minimum design and calibration requirements, necessary in part, for accurate opacity monitoring measurements in regulatory environmental opacity monitoring applications subject to 10 percent or higher opacity standards. The ASTM D6216-12 standard was developed and adopted by the American Society for Testing and Materials. The standard may be obtained from http://www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an environmental health or safety standard. This action would correct and update existing testing regulations. List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 51 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures. 40 CFR Part 60 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures. 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures. Dated: December 11, 2017. E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency proposes to amend title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows: Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. 0 2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows: 0 a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in Method 201A. 0 b. Revise the last sentence in section 8.2 in Method 204. 0 c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205. The revisions read as follows: Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State Implementation Plans * * * * * Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure) * * * * * 12.5 Equations. Use the following equations to complete the calculations required in this test method. * * * * * Sampling Dwell Time at Each Point. Ntp is the total number of traverse points. You must use the preliminary velocity traverse data. [[Page 3641]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.000 * * * * * Method 204--Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure * * * * * 8.2 * * * The NEAR must be <=0.05. * * * * * Method 205--Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument Calibrations * * * * * 2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be recalibrated once per calendar year using NIST-traceable flow standards with an uncertainty <=0.25 percent. You shall report the results of the calibration by the person or manufacturer who carried out the calibration whenever the dilution system is used, listing the date of the most recent calibration, the due date for the next calibration, calibration point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and acceptance criteria. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for the operation and use of the gas dilution system. A copy of the manufacturer's instructions for the operation of the instrument, as well as the most recent calibration documentation shall be made available for inspection at the test site. * * * * * PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES 0 3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 0 4. In Sec. 60.17: 0 a. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(177) through (h)(209) as (h)(178) through (h)(210). 0 b. Add new paragraph (h)(177). The addition reads as follows: Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference. * * * * * (h) * * * (177) ASTM D6216-12, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance Specifications, IBR approved for appendix B to part 60: Performance Specification 1. * * * * * Subpart D--Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators 0 5. Revise Sec. 60.46(b)(2)(i) to read as follows: Sec. 60.46 Test methods and procedures. * * * * * (b) * * * (2) * * * (i) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The probe and filter holder heating systems in the sampling train shall be set to provide an average gas temperature of 1605 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * Subpart Da--Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 0 6. Revise Sec. 60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) to read as follows: Sec. 60.50Da Compliance determination procedures and methods. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) * * * (ii) * * * (A) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at least 120 minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf). The probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train may be set to provide an average gas temperature of no greater than 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * Subpart Db--Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial- Institutional Steam Generating Units 0 7. Revise Sec. 60.46b (d)(4) to read as follows: Sec. 60.46b Compliance and performance test methods and procedures for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides. * * * * * (d) * * * (4) For Method 5 of appendix A of this part, the temperature of the sample gas in the probe and filter holder is monitored and is maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * Subpart Dc--Standards of Performance for Small Industrial- Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units 0 8. Revise Sec. 60.45c(a)(5) to read as follows: Sec. 60.45c Compliance and performance test methods and procedures for particulate matter. (a) * * * (5) For Method 5 or 5B of appendix A of this part, the temperature of the sample gas in the probe and filter holder shall be monitored and maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * Subpart Ea--Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction Is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and On or Before September 20, 1994 0 9. Revise Sec. 60.58a(b)(3) to read as follows: Sec. 60.58a Compliance and performance testing. * * * * * (b) * * * (3) Method 5 shall be used for determining compliance with the particulate matter emission limit. The minimum sample volume shall be 1.7 cubic meters (60 cubic feet). The probe and filter holder heating systems in the sample train shall be set to provide a gas temperature of 160[deg] 5 [deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). An oxygen or carbon dioxide measurement shall be obtained simultaneously with each Method 5 run. * * * * * Subpart CC--Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants 0 10. Revise Sec. 60.293(f) to read as follows: Sec. 60.293 Standards for particulate matter from glass melting furnace with modified-processes. * * * * * (f) Test methods and procedures as specified in Sec. 60.296 shall be used to determine compliance with this section except that to determine compliance for any glass melting furnace using modified processes and fired with either a gaseous fuel or a liquid fuel containing less than 0.50 weight percent sulfur, Method 5 shall be used with the probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train set to provide a gas temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * 0 11. Revise Sec. 60.296(d)(2) to read as follows: [[Page 3642]] Sec. 60.296 Test methods and procedures. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) Method 5 shall be used to determine the particulate matter concentration (c s ) and volumetric flow rate (Qsd ) of the effluent gas. The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.90 dscm (31.8 dscf). The probe and filter holder heating system may be set to provide a gas temperature no greater than 1775 [deg]C (350 9[emsp14][deg]F), except under the conditions specified in Sec. 60.293(e). * * * * * 0 12. Revise ``(CO 2 )a '' in section 12.1 in Method 2B of appendix A-1 to part 60 to read as follows: Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 Through 2F * * * * * Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline Vapor Incinerators * * * * * 12.1 Nomenclature. * * * * * (CO2 )a = Ambient carbon dioxide concentration, ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be assumed to equal the global monthly mean CO2 concentration posted at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data). * * * * * 0 13. In appendix A-3 to part 60: 0 a. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, and 8.5 in Method 5. 0 b. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1, 8.2, and 11.0 in Method 5B. 0 c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B. 0 d. Revise sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 in Method 5I. The revisions read as follows: Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 Through 5I * * * * * Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources * * * * * 2.0 Summary of Method. Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of 1205 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after the removal of uncombined water. * * * * * 6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable of maintaining a probe gas temperature during sampling of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or as approved by the Administrator for a particular application. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually monitored during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581 and utilizing the calibration curves of APTD- 0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD- 0576) will be considered acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to about 480 [deg]C (900 [deg]F); quartz glass liners shall be used for temperatures between 480 and 900 [deg]C (900 and 1,650 [deg]F). Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the Administrator. The softening temperature for borosilicate glass is 820 [deg]C (1500 [deg]F), and for quartz glass it is 1500 [deg]C (2700 [deg]F). Whenever practical, every effort should be made to use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal liners (e.g., 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825 or other corrosion resistant metals) made of seamless tubing may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. * * * * * 6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any heating system capable of monitoring and maintaining temperature around the filter shall be used to ensure the sample gas temperature exiting the filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) during sampling or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular application. The monitoring and regulation of the temperature around the filter may be done with the filter temperature sensor or another temperature sensor. 6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A temperature sensor capable of measuring temperature to within 3 [deg]C (5.4 [deg]F) shall be installed so that the sensing tip of the temperature sensor is in direct contact with the sample gas exiting the filter. The sensing tip of the sensor may be encased in glass, Teflon, or metal and must protrude at least \1/2\ in. into the sample gas exiting the filter. The filter temperature sensor must be monitored and recorded during sampling to ensure a sample gas temperature exiting the filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular application. * * * * * 6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, calibrated temperature sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment, as shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic checks of isokinetic rates. The average DGM temperature for use in the calculations of Section 12.0 may be obtained by averaging the two temperature sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the DGM as shown in Figure 5-3 or alternatively from a single temperature sensor located at the immediate outlet of the DGM or the plenum of the DGM. * * * * * 8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic sampling rate (within 10 percent of true isokinetic unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a sample gas temperature through the filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator. Note: After startup of the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the system and temperature reading to within the required temperature threshold. * * * * * Method 5B--Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources * * * * * 2.0 Summary of Method Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). The collected sample is then heated in an oven at 160 [deg]C (320 [deg]F) for 6 hours to volatilize any condensed sulfuric acid that may have been collected, and the nonsulfuric acid particulate mass is determined gravimetrically. * * * * * 6.1 Sample Collection. The probe liner heating system and filter heating system must be capable of maintaining a sample gas temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). * * * * * 8.2 Probe and Filter Temperatures. Maintain the probe outlet and filter temperatures at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). Note: After start-up of the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the system and temperature reading to within the required temperature threshold. * * * * * 11.0 Analytical Procedure 11.1 Record and report the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in Figure 5B-1. 11.2 Handle each sample container as follows: 11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample container to a tared glass weighing dish. Oven dry the filter sample at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight'' means a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between weighings. 11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the container, and confirm on the [[Page 3643]] analysis sheet whether leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container either volumetrically to 1 ml or gravimetrically to 0.5 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. Then oven dry the probe sample at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. 11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field. 11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure the acetone in this container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as well as the acetone blank container may be evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to prevent ``bumping,'' the evaporation process must be closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point. * * * * * 17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weight of particulate collected, mg Container number ----------------------------------------------- Final weight Tare weight Weight gain -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1....................................................................................................... 2....................................................................................................... Total:.................................................................................................. Less acetone blank...................................................................................... Weight of particulate matter............................................................................ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume of liquid water collected ------------------------------- Impinger Silica gel volume, ml weight, g -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final................................................................................................................... Initial................................................................................................................. Liquid collected........................................................................................................ Total volume collected.................................................................................................. .............. g* ml -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by density of water (1 g/ml). Figure 5B-1. Analytical Data Sheet * * * * * Method 5I--Determination of Low Level Particulate Emissions From Stationary Sources * * * * * 2.1. Description. The system setup and operation is essentially identical to Method 5. Particulate is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a 47 mm glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). The PM mass is determined by gravimetric analysis after the removal of uncombined water. Specific measures in this procedure designed to improve system performance at low particulate levels include: 1. Improved sample handling procedures 2. Light weight sample filter assembly 3. Use of low residue grade acetone Accuracy is improved through the minimization of systemic errors associated with sample handling and weighing procedures. High purity reagents, all glass, grease free, sample train components, and light weight filter assemblies and beakers, each contribute to the overall objective of improved precision and accuracy at low particulate concentrations. * * * * * 8.5.2.2 Care should be taken to maintain the filter box temperature of the paired trains as close as possible to the Method required temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). If separate ovens are being used for simultaneously operated trains, it is recommended that the oven temperature of each train be maintained within 5 [deg]C ( 9[emsp14][deg]F) of each other. Note: After startup of the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the system and temperature reading to within the required temperature threshold. * * * * * 0 14. In appendix A-4 to part 60: 0 a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in Method 7. 0 b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 to read as sections 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8. 0 c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in Method 8. 0 d. Revise Figure 8-1 in Method 8. Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B * * * * * Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary Sources * * * * * 10.1.2 Determination of Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor K c . Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml of the KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml = 100 [mu]g NO2 ) to a series of five 50-ml volumetric flasks. To each flask, add 25 ml of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add 1 N NaOH to each flask until the pH is between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35 drops). Dilute to the mark with water. Mix thoroughly, and pipette a 25-ml aliquot of each solution into a separate porcelain evaporating dish. Beginning with the evaporation step, follow the analysis procedure of section 11.2 until the solution has been transferred to the 100-ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the absorbance of each solution at the optimum wavelength as determined in section 10.1.1.2. This calibration procedure must be repeated on each day that samples are analyzed. Calculate the spectrophotometer calibration factor as shown in section 12.2. * * * * * 11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents of the flask thoroughly, and measure the absorbance at the optimum wavelength used for the standards (Section 10.1.1.2), using the blank solution as a zero reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of water if the absorbance exceeds A4 , the absorbance of the 400-[mu]g NO2 standard (see section 10.1.3). * * * * * Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From Stationary Sources * * * * * 6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or quartz glass with a sharp, tapered leading edge and coupled to the probe liner using a Teflon union. When the stack temperature exceeds 210 [deg]C (410[emsp14][deg]F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or other leak free, non-contaminating fitting must be used to couple the nozzle to the probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a one-piece glass nozzle/liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall be >30[deg], and the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the button-hook or elbow design, unless otherwise specified by [[Page 3644]] the Administrator. Other materials of construction may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical nozzle sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (\1/8\ to \1/2\ in) inside diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (\1/16\ in). Larger nozzles sizes are also available if higher volume sampling trains are used. 6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass, with a heating system to prevent visible condensation during sampling. Do not use metal probe liners. 6.1.1.3 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass, with a glass frit filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. Other gasket materials (e.g., Teflon or Viton) may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. The holder design shall provide a positive seal against leakage from the outside or around the filter. The filter holder shall be placed between the first and second impingers. Do not heat the filter holder. 6.1.1.4 Impingers. Four, of the Greenburg-Smith design, as shown in Figure 8-1. The first and third impingers must have standard tips. The second and fourth impingers must be modified by replacing the insert with an approximately 13-mm (\1/2\-in.) ID glass tube, having an unconstricted tip located 13 mm (\1/2\ in.) from the bottom of the impinger. Similar collection systems, subject to the approval of the Administrator, may be used. 6.1.1.5 Temperature Sensor. Thermometer, or equivalent, to measure the temperature of the gas leaving the impinger train to within 1 [deg]C (2[emsp14][deg]F). * * * * * BILLING CODE 6560-50-P [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.001 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P * * * * * 0 15. Redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph (b) in section 13.1 in Method 18 of appendix A-6 to part 60 to read as follows: Appendix A-6 to Part 60--Test Methods 16 Through 18 * * * * * Method 18--Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography * * * * * 13.1 * * * (b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the procedure in section 8.4. Conduct the appropriate recovery study in section 8.4 at each sampling point where the method is being applied. Submit the data and results of the recovery procedure with the reporting of results under section 8.3. * * * * * 0 16. In appendix A-7 to part 60: 0 a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in Method 22. 0 b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22. The revisions read as follows: Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E * * * * * Method 22--Visual Determination of Fugitive Emissions From Material Sources and Smoke Emissions From Flares * * * * * 11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the following information on the field data sheet (Figure 22-1): Company name, industry, process unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record also the [[Page 3645]] estimated wind speed, wind direction, and sky condition. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the observer location relative to the source and the sun. Indicate the potential and actual emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography as described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section. 11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the following information on the field data sheet (Figure 22-2): Company name, industry, process unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record as appropriate the type, location, and intensity of lighting on the data sheet. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the observer location relative to the source. Indicate the potential and actual fugitive emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography as described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section. 11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records. Digital photographs, annotated or unaltered, may be used to record and report sky conditions, observer's location relative to the source, observer's location relative to the sun, process unit being observed, potential emission points and actual emission points for the requirements in Sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The image must have the proper lighting, field of view and depth of field to properly distinguish the sky condition (if applicable), process unit, potential emission point and actual emission point. At least one digital photograph must be from the point of the view of the observer. The photograph(s) representing the environmental conditions must be taken within reasonable time of the observation (i.e., 15 mins). Any photographs altered or annotated must be retained in an unaltered format for recordkeeping purposes. * * * * * 0 17. In appendix A-8 to part 60: 0 a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26. 0 b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A. 0 c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A. 0 d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1 in Test Method 28WHH. The revisions read as follows: Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B * * * * * Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method * * * * * 6.2.2 Storage Bottles. 100- or 250-ml, high-density polyethylene or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to store impinger samples. * * * * * Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method * * * * * 6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri Dishes, Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and Rubber Policeman. Same as Method 5, sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7. * * * * * 6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. High-density polyethylene or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to store impinger samples. Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances * * * * * 13.5.1 * * * [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.002 * * * * * 0 18. In appendix B to part 60: 0 a. Revise sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 8. in Performance Specification 1. 0 b. Revise section 13.2 in Performance Specification 2. 0 c. Revise sections 12.0 and 13.2 in Performance Specification 3. 0 d. Revise section 13.1 in Performance Specification 11. 0 e. Add section 13.0 in Performance Specification 15. 0 f. Revise section 11.8.7 and table 1 in Performance Specification 18. 0 g. Add section 12.0 to Appendix A of Performance Specification 18. The revisions read as follows: Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications * * * * * Performance Specification 1--Specifications and Test Procedures for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources * * * * * 2.1 ASTM D6216-12 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 60.17) is the reference for design specifications, manufacturer's performance specifications, and test procedures. The opacity monitor manufacturer must periodically select and test an opacity monitor, that is representative of a group of monitors produced during a specified period or lot, for conformance with the design specifications in ASTM D6216-12. The opacity monitor manufacturer must test each opacity monitor for conformance with the manufacturer's performance specifications in ASTM D6216-12. Note: If the initial certification of the opacity monitor occurred before January 26, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it is not necessary to recertify using D6216-12. * * * * * 3.1 All definitions and discussions from section 3 of ASTM D6216-12 are applicable to PS-1. * * * * * 6.1 Continuous Opacity Monitoring System. You, as owner or operator, are responsible for purchasing an opacity monitor that meets the specifications of ASTM D6216-12, including a suitable data recorder or automated data acquisition handling system. Example data recorders include an analog strip chart recorder or more appropriately an electronic data acquisition and reporting system with an input signal range compatible with the analyzer output. * * * * * 8.1 * * * (1) You must purchase an opacity monitor that complies with ASTM D6216-12 and obtain a certificate of conformance from the opacity monitor manufacturer. (2) * * * (3) * * * (ii) Calibration Error Check. Conduct a three-point calibration error test using three calibration attenuators that produce outlet pathlength corrected, single-pass opacity values shown in ASTM D6216-12, section 7.5. If your applicable limit is less than 10 percent opacity, use attenuators as described in ASTM D6216-12, section 7.5 for applicable standards of 10 to 19 percent opacity. Confirm the external audit device produces the proper zero value on the COMS data recorder. Separately, insert each calibration attenuators (low, mid, and high-level) into the external audit device. While inserting each attenuator, (1) ensure that the entire light beam passes through the attenuator, (2) minimize interference from reflected light, and (3) leave the attenuator in place for at least two times the shortest recording interval on the COMS data recorder. Make a total of five nonconsecutive readings for each attenuator. At the end of the test, correlate each attenuator insertion to the corresponding value from the data recorder. Subtract the single-pass calibration attenuator values corrected to the stack exit conditions from the COMS responses. Calculate the arithmetic mean difference, standard deviation, and confidence coefficient of the five measurements value using equations 1-3, 1-4, and 1-5. Calculate the calibration error as the sum of the absolute value of the mean difference and the 95 percent confidence coefficient for each of the three test attenuators using equation 1- 6. Report the calibration error test results for each of the three attenuators. * * * * * 8.2 * * * (1) Conduct the verification procedures for design specifications in section 6 of ASTM D6216-12. [[Page 3646]] (2) Conduct the verification procedures for performance specifications in section 7 of ASTM D6216-12. (3) Provide to the owner or operator, a report of the opacity monitor's conformance to the design and performance specifications required in sections 6 and 7 of ASTM D6216-12 in accordance with the reporting requirements of section 9 in ASTM D6216-12. * * * * * 9.0 What quality control measures are required by PS-1? Opacity monitor manufacturers must initiate a quality program following the requirements of ASTM D6216-12, section 8. The quality program must include (1) a quality system and (2) a corrective action program. * * * * * 12.1 Desired Attenuator Values. Calculate the desired attenuator value corrected to the emission outlet pathlength as follows: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.003 Where: OP1 = Nominal opacity value of required low-, mid-, or high-range calibration attenuators. OP2 = Desired attenuator opacity value from ASTM D6216- 12, section 7.5 at the opacity limit required by the applicable subpart. L1 = Monitoring pathlength. L2 = Emission outlet pathlength. * * * * * 13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity monitoring equipment must comply with the design specifications of ASTM D6216-12. 13.2 Manufacturer's Performance Specifications. The opacity monitor must comply with the manufacturer's performance specifications of ASTM D6216-12. * * * * * 16.0 * * * 8. ASTM D6216-12: Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance Specifications. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). April 1998. * * * * * Performance Specification 2--Specifications and Test Procedures for SO2 and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources * * * * * 13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RA criteria Calculate . . . (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, with RM in <20.0 RATA are >=50% of emission the denominator. standard. If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, emission <10.0 RATA are <50% of emission standard in the standard. denominator. For SO2 emission standards <130 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <15.0 but86 ng/J (0.30 standard in the and 0.20 lb/million Btu). denominator. For SO2 emission standards <86 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <20.0 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu). standard in the denominator. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for O 2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources * * * * * 12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis Summarize the results on a data sheet similar to that shown in Figure 2.2 of PS2. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.004 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.005 * * * * * 13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of the CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent of the mean value of the reference method [[Page 3647]] (RM) data when calculated using equation 3-1. The results are also acceptable if the result of Equation 3-2 is less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2 ). * * * * * Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources * * * * * 13.1 What is the 7-day drift check performance specification? Your daily PM CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate that the daily drift of your PM CEMS does not deviate from the value of the reference light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or other technology-suitable reference standard by more than 2 percent of the response range. If your CEMS includes diluent and/or auxiliary monitors (for temperature, pressure, and/or moisture) that are employed as a necessary part of this performance specification, you must determine the calibration drift separately for each ancillary monitor in terms of its respective output (see the appropriate performance specification for the diluent CEMS specification). None of the calibration drifts may exceed their individual specification. * * * * * Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive FTIR Continuous Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary Sources * * * * * 13.0 Method Performance [Reserved] * * * * * Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources * * * * * 11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD for each day must be less than 5.0 percent of the span value as specified in section 13.2 of this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7 consecutive operating days. * * * * * Table 1--Interference Test Gas Concentrations ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Approximate concentration Potential interferent gas \1\ (balance N2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CO2.................................. 15%1% CO2.\2\ CO................................... 100 20 ppm. CH2O................................. 20 5 ppm. CH4.................................. 100 20 ppm. NH3.................................. 10 5 ppm (extractive CEMS only). NO................................... 250 50 ppm. SO2.................................. 200 20 ppm. O2................................... 3% 1% O2.\2\ H2O.................................. 10% 1% H2O.\2\ N2................................... Balance.\2\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ Any of these specific gases can be tested at a lower level if the manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations. \2\ Gases for short path IP cell interference tests cannot be added above 100 percent stack equivalent concentration. Add these gases at the indicated percentages to make up the remaining cell volume. * * * * * PS-18 Appendix A--Standard Addition Procedures * * * * * 12.0 Reserved * * * * * 0 19. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and 5.1.2(3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F to part 60 to read as follows: Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination * * * * * 5.1.2 Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA). If applicable, a CGA may be conducted in three of four calendar quarters, but in no more than three quarters in succession. To conduct a CGA: (1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant and diluent portions of the CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of known concentration at two points within the following ranges: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Audit range ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Audit point Diluent monitors for-- Pollutant monitors -------------------------------------------------------- CO2 O2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1................................. 20 to 30% of span 5 to 8% by volume.. 4 to 6% by volume. value. 2................................. 50 to 60% of span 10 to 14% by volume 8 to 12% by volume. value. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inject each of the audit gases, three times each for a total of six injections. Inject the gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not inject the same gas concentration twice in succession. Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit points 1 and 2. Do not dilute gas from audit cylinder when challenging the CEMS. The monitor should be challenged at each audit point for a sufficient period of time to assure adsorption-desorption of the CEMS sample transport surfaces has stabilized. (2) * * * (3) Use Certified Reference Materials (CRM's) (See Citation 1) audit gases that have been certified by comparison to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Materials (SRM's) or EPA Protocol Gases following the most recent edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). Procedures for preparation of CRM's are described in Citation 1. Procedures for preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are described in Citation 2. In the case that a suitable audit gas level is not commercially available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may be used to dilute CRM's or EPA Protocol Gases to the needed level. The difference between the actual concentration of the audit gas and the concentration indicated by the monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the CEMS. * * * * * PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES 0 20. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 0 21. In Sec. 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) introductory text and (g)(2)(v) to read as follows: Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements. * * * * * (g) * * * (2) Contents of a performance test, CMS performance evaluation, or CMS quality assurance test report (electronic or paper submitted copy). Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard, test method, CMS performance specification, or quality assurance requirement for a CMS, or as otherwise approved by the Administrator in writing, the report shall include the elements identified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (vi) of this section. * * * * * (v) Where a test method, CMS performance specification, or on-going quality assurance requirement for a CMS requires you record or report, the following shall be included in your [[Page 3648]] report: Record of preparation of standards, record of calibrations, raw data sheets for field sampling, raw data sheets for field and laboratory analyses, chain-of-custody documentation, and example calculations for reported results. * * * * * 0 22. In Sec. 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i) to read as follows: Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements. * * * * * (e) * * * (5) * * * (i) The owner or operator shall furnish the Administrator a copy of a written report of the results of the performance evaluation containing the information specified in Sec. 63.7(g)(2)(i) through (vi) within 60 days of completion of the performance evaluation, unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard. * * * * * Subpart NNN--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 0 23. Revise Sec. 63.1385(a)(5) to read as follows: Sec. 63.1385 Test methods and procedures. (a) * * * (5) Method 5 or Method 29 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3) for the concentration of total PM. When using Method 5, each run must consist of a minimum sample volume of 2 dry standard cubic meters (dscm). When using Method 29, each run must consist of a minimum sample volume of 3 dscm. When measuring PM concentration using either Method 5 or 29, the probe and filter holder heating system must be set to provide a gas temperature no greater than 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F). * * * * * Subpart DDDDD--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters * * * * * 0 24. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of part 63 to read as follows: Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63--Fuel Analysis Requirements [As stated in Sec. 63.7521, you must comply with the following requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in Sec. 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the source owner or operator] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To conduct a fuel analysis for the following pollutant . . . You must . . . Using . . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Mercury.................... a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,\a\ or ASTM D7430,\a\ or ASTM D6883,\a\ or ASTM D2234/D2234M \a\ (for coal) or EPA 1631 or EPA 1631E or ASTM D6323 \a\ (for solid), or EPA 821-R- 01-013 (for liquid or solid), or ASTM D4177 \a\ (for liquid), or ASTM D4057 \a\ (for liquid), or equivalent. b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(d) or equivalent. c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\ composited fuel (for solid samples), samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M \a\ (for coal), ASTM D5198 \a\ (for biomass), or EPA 3050 \a\ (for solid fuel), or EPA 821-R- 01-013 \a\ (for liquid or solid), or equivalent. d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for content of the coal) or ASTM E711 fuel type. \a\ (for biomass), or ASTM D5864 \a\ for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 \a\ or equivalent. e. Determine ASTM D3173,\a\ ASTM moisture content E871,\a\ or ASTM of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM D240, or ASTM D95 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or equivalent. f. Measure ASTM D6722 \a\ (for mercury coal), EPA SW-846- concentration in 7471B \a\ or EPA fuel sample. 1631 or EPA 1631E (for solid samples), or EPA SW-846-7470A \a\ or EPA SW-846- 7471B \a\ (for liquid samples), or EPA 821-R-01-013 (for liquid or solid), or equivalent. g. Convert For fuel mixtures use concentration Equation 8 in Sec. into units of 63.7530. pounds of mercury per MMBtu of heat content. 2. HCl........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,\a\ or ASTM D7430,\a\ or ASTM D6883,\a\ or ASTM D2234/D2234M \a\ (for coal) or ASTM D6323 \a\ (for coal or biomass), ASTM D4177 \a\ (for liquid fuels) or ASTM D4057 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or equivalent. b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(d) or equivalent. c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\ composited fuel (for solid samples), samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M \a\ (for coal), or ASTM D5198 \a\ (for biomass), or EPA 3050 \a\ or equivalent. d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for content of the coal) or ASTM E711 fuel type. \a\ (for biomass), ASTM D5864, ASTM D240 \a\ or equivalent. e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM D240,\a\ or ASTM D95 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or equivalent. f. Measure EPA SW-846-9250,\a\ chlorine ASTM D6721,\a\ ASTM concentration in D4208 \a\ (for fuel sample. coal), or EPA SW-846- 5050 \a\ or ASTM E776 \a\ (for solid fuel), or EPA SW-846- 9056 \a\ or SW-846- 9076 \a\ (for solids or liquids) or equivalent. g. Convert For fuel mixtures use concentrations Equation 7 in Sec. into units of 63.7530 and convert pounds of HCl from chlorine to HCl per MMBtu of by multiplying by heat content. 1.028. 3. Mercury Fuel Specification a. Measure Method 30B (M30B) at for other gas 1 fuels. mercury 40 CFR part 60, concentration in appendix A-8 of this the fuel sample chapter or ASTM and convert to D5954,\a\ ASTM units of D6350,\a\ ISO 6978- micrograms per 1:2003(E).\a\ or ISO cubic meter, or. 6978-2:2003(E),\a\ or EPA-1631 \a\ or equivalent. [[Page 3649]] b. Measure Method 29, 30A, or mercury 30B (M29, M30A, or concentration in M30B) at 40 CFR part the exhaust gas 60, appendix A-8 of when firing only this chapter or the other gas 1 Method 101A or fuel is fired in Method 102 at 40 CFR the boiler or part 61, appendix B process heater. of this chapter, or ASTM Method D6784 \a\ or equivalent. 4. TSM........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,\a\ or ASTM D7430,\a\ or ASTM D6883,\a\ or ASTM D2234/D2234M \a\ (for coal) or ASTM D6323 \a\ (for coal or biomass), or ASTM D4177,\a\ (for liquid fuels)or ASTM D4057 \a\ (for liquid fuels),or equivalent. b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec. samples. 63.7521(d) or equivalent. c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\ composited fuel (for solid samples), samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M \a\ (for coal), ASTM D5198 \a\ or TAPPI T266 \a\ (for biomass), or EPA 3050 \a\ or equivalent. d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for content of the coal) or ASTM E711 fuel type. \a\ (for biomass), or ASTM D5864 \a\ for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 \a\ or equivalent. e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or of the fuel type. D5864, or ASTM D240,\a\ or ASTM D95 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4177 \a\ (for liquid fuels) or ASTM D4057 \a\ (for liquid fuels), or equivalent. f. Measure TSM ASTM D3683,\a\ or concentration in ASTM D4606,\a\ or fuel sample. ASTM D6357 \a\ or EPA 200.8 \a\ or EPA SW-846-6020,\a\ or EPA SW-846-6020A,\a\ or EPA SW-846- 6010C,\a\ EPA 7060 \a\ or EPA 7060A \a\ (for arsenic only), or EPA SW-846-7740 \a\ (for selenium only). g. Convert For fuel mixtures use concentrations Equation 9 in Sec. into units of 63.7530. pounds of TSM per MMBtu of heat content. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \a\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14. * * * * * Subpart UUUUU--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 0 25. Revise Sec. 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) to read as follows: Sec. 63.10010 What are my monitoring, installation, operation, and maintenance requirements? * * * * * (h) * * * (7) * * * (i) * * * (1) Install and certify your PM CEMS according to the procedures and requirements in Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources in Appendix B to part 60 of this chapter, using Method 5 at Appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter and ensuring that the front half filter temperature shall be 160[deg] 5 [deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). The reportable measurement output from the PM CEMS must be expressed in units of the applicable emissions limit (e.g., lb/MMBtu, lb/MWh). * * * * * 0 26. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows: Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Performance Testing Requirements [As stated in Sec. 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected sources: 1] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You must perform the following activities, as To conduct a performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- Using . . . 2 the following pollutant . . . or output-based emission limit . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Filterable Particulate matter Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1 (PM). location and the number to part 60 of this of traverse points. chapter. b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this chapter. c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60 concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/ stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3 d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3 content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this chapter. [[Page 3650]] e. Measure the filterable Methods 5 and 5I at PM concentration. appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter. For positive pressure fabric filters, Method 5D at appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter for filterable PM emissions. Note that the Method 5 or 5I front half temperature shall be 160[deg] 14 [deg]C (320[deg] 25 [deg]F). f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). OR OR PM CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Performance Specification operate, and maintain the 11 at appendix B to part PM CEMS. 60 of this chapter and Procedure 2 at appendix F to part 60 of this chapter. b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a), diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d). and/or moisture monitoring systems. c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor emissions concentrations methodology at appendix to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions rates. rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). 2. Total or individual non-Hg HAP Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1 metals. location and the number to part 60 of this of traverse points. chapter. b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this chapter. c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60 concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/ stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3 d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3 content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this chapter. e. Measure the HAP metals Method 29 at appendix A-8 emissions concentrations to part 60 of this and determine each chapter. For liquid oil- individual HAP metals fired units, Hg is emissions concentration, included in HAP metals as well as the total and you may use Method filterable HAP metals 29, Method 30B at emissions concentration appendix A-8 to part 60 and total HAP metals of this chapter; for emissions concentration. Method 29, you must report the front half and back half results separately. When using Method 29, report metals matrix spike and recovery levels. f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor concentrations methodology at appendix (individual HAP metals, A-7 to part 60 of this total filterable HAP chapter, or calculate metals, and total HAP using mass emissions metals) to lb/MMBtu or lb/ rate and gross output MWh emissions rates. data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). 3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1 hydrogen fluoride (HF). location and the number to part 60 of this of traverse points. chapter. b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this chapter. c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60 concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/ stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3 d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3 content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this chapter. e. Measure the HCl and HF Method 26 or Method 26A emissions concentrations. at appendix A-8 to part 60 of this chapter or Method 320 at appendix A to part 63 of this chapter or ASTM 6348-03 3 with (1) the following conditions when using ASTM D6348-03: (A) The test plan preparation and implementation in the Annexes to ASTM D6348- 03, Sections A1 through A8 are mandatory; [[Page 3651]] (B) For ASTM D6348-03 Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Technique), the percent (%) R must be determined for each target analyte (see Equation A5.5); (C) For the ASTM D6348-03 test data to be acceptable for a target analyte, %R must be 70% >=R <=130%; and ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Regarding emissions data collected during periods of startup or shutdown, see Sec. Sec. 63.10020(b) and (c) and 63.10021(h). \2\ See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times. \3\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14. 3.e.1(D) The %R value for each compound must be reported in the test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated %R value for that compound using the following equation: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.006 and ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You must perform the To conduct a performance test for following activities, as the following pollutant . . . Using . . . (cont'd) applicable to your input- Using . . .2 (cont'd) (cont'd) or output-based emission limit . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) spiking levels nominally no greater than two times the level corresponding to the applicable emission limit. Method 26A must be used if there are entrained water droplets in the exhaust stream. f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). OR OR HCl and/or HF CEMS... a. Install, certify, Appendix B of this operate, and maintain the subpart. HCl or HF CEMS. b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a), diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d). and/or moisture monitoring systems. c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor emissions concentrations methodology at appendix to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions rates. rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). 4. Mercury (Hg)................... Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1 location and the number to part 60 of this of traverse points. chapter or Method 30B at Appendix A-8 for Method 30B point selection. b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this chapter. c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60 concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/ stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3 d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3 content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this chapter. e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A- concentration. 8 to part 60 of this chapter, ASTM D6784,3 or Method 29 at appendix A- 8 to part 60 of this chapter; for Method 29, you must report the front half and back half results separately. f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor concentration to lb/TBtu methodology at appendix or lb/GWh emission rates. A-7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). [[Page 3652]] OR OR Hg CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of operate, and maintain the appendix A of this CEMS. subpart. b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a), diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d). and/or moisture monitoring systems. c. Convert hourly Section 6 of appendix A emissions concentrations to this subpart. to 30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/ TBtu or lb/GWh emissions rates. OR OR Sorbent trap a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of monitoring system. operate, and maintain the appendix A to this sorbent trap monitoring subpart. system. b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a), flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d). moisture monitoring systems. c. Convert emissions Section 6 of appendix A concentrations to 30 to this subpart. boiler operating day rolling average lb/TBtu or lb/GWh emissions rates. OR OR LEE testing.......... a. Select sampling ports Single point located at location and the number the 10% centroidal area of traverse points. of the duct at a port location per Method 1 at appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter or Method 30B at Appendix A- 8 for Method 30B point selection. b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G, volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this chapter or flow monitoring system certified per appendix A of this subpart. c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60 concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/ stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981,3 or diluent gas monitoring systems certified according to part 75 of this chapter. d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3 content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this chapter, or moisture monitoring systems certified according to part 75 of this chapter. e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A- concentration. 8 to part 60 of this chapter; perform a 30 operating day test, with a maximum of 10 operating days per run (i.e., per pair of sorbent traps) or sorbent trap monitoring system or Hg CEMS certified per appendix A of this subpart. f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor concentrations from the methodology at appendix LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/ A-7 to part 60 of this GWh emissions rates. chapter, or calculate using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). g. Convert average lb/TBtu Potential maximum annual or lb/GWh Hg emission heat input in TBtu or rate to lb/year, if you potential maximum are attempting to meet electricity generated in the 29.0 lb/year GWh. threshold. 5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)........... SO2 CEMS............. a. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a) CEMS. and (f). b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a), flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d). moisture monitoring systems. c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor emissions concentrations methodology at appendix to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions rates. rate and gross output data (see Sec. 63.10007(e)). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times. 3 Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14. * * * * * 0 27. In appendix A to part 63: 0 a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303. 0 b. Revise sections 2.0, 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method 308. 0 c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in Method 308. 0 d. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in Method 308. 0 e. Revise section 9.2.3 in Method 320.. 0 f. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323. 0 g. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1. and section 8.2.3.2 in Method 325A. 0 h. Add section 8.2.3.3 in Method 325A. [[Page 3653]] 0 i. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5, and 12.2.2 and table 17-1 in Method 325B. 0 j. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 in Method 325B. The revisions read as follows: Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods Pollutant Measurement Methods From Various Waste Media * * * * * Method 303--Determination of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke Oven Batteries * * * * * 12.4 Average Duration of VE from Charging Operations. Use Equation 303-3 to calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average of seconds of visible emissions from the charging operation for each battery using these current day's observations and the 29 previous valid daily sets of observations. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.007 * * * * * Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From Stationary Sources * * * * * 2.0 Summary of Method A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack. The methanol is collected in deionized distilled water and adsorbed on silica gel. The sample is returned to the laboratory where the methanol in the water fraction is separated from other organic compounds with a gas chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by a flame ionization detector (FID). The fraction adsorbed on silica gel is extracted with deionized distilled water and is then separated and measured by GC/FID. * * * * * 7.2.2 [Reserved]. * * * * * 7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent Tube Samples. Prepare a series of methanol standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the methanol working standard into a 100-ml volumetric flask and diluting the contents to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled water. This standard will contain 10 [micro]g/ml of methanol. Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this standard, respectively, into four 50-ml volumetric flasks. Dilute each solution to 50 ml with deionized distilled water. These standards will have 1, 3, and 5 [micro]g/ml of methanol, respectively. Transfer all four standards into 40-ml glass vials capped with Teflon[supreg]-lined septa and store under refrigeration. Discard any excess solution. * * * * * 8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before and after the sampling run is mandatory. The leak-check procedure is as follows: Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40-ml/min) rotameter to the outlet of the DGM, and place a vacuum gauge at or near the probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 inch) Hg or the highest vacuum experienced during the sampling run, and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage rate in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is acceptable. Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off the pump. * * * * * 9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures. The following quality control measures are required: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quality control Section measure Effect ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1......... Sampling equipment Ensures accurate leak check and measurement of calibration. sample volume. 10.2....................... GC calibration....... Ensures precision of GC analysis. 13.0....................... Methanol spike Verifies all recovery check. methanol in stack gas is being captured in impinge/ adsorbent tube setup. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * 11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml of deionized distilled water to each of the stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials for 30 minutes. * * * * * 12.1 Nomenclature. C af = Concentration of methanol in the front of the adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml. Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back of the adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml. Ci = Concentration of methanol in the impinger portion of the sample train, [micro]g/ml. E = Mass emission rate of methanol, [micro]g/hr (lb/hr). ms = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on adsorbent with spiked train (mg). mu = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on adsorbent with unspiked train (mg). mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured (mg/L). Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in the sample train, [micro]g. Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg). Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg). Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscm/hr (dscf/hr). R = fraction of spiked compound recovered s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked target compound Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature, degrees K ([deg]R). Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293 degrees K (528 [deg]R). Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample, ml. Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample, ml. Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml. Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the DGM, dry cubic meters (dcm), dry cubic feet (dcf). Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the DGM, corrected to standard conditions, dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry standard cubic feet (dscf). * * * * * 12.5 Recovery Fraction (R) [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.008 [[Page 3654]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.009 13.0 Method Performance Since a potential sample may contain a variety of compounds from various sources, a specific precision limit for the analysis of field samples is impractical. Precision in the range of 5 to 10 percent relative standard deviation (RSD) is typical for gas chromatographic techniques, but an experienced GC operator with a reliable instrument can readily achieve 5 percent RSD. For this method, the following combined GC/operator values are required. (a) Precision. Triplicate analyses of calibration standards fall within 5 percent of their mean value. (b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the following spike recovery procedure at each sampling point where the method is being applied. i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical sampling trains. Collocate the two sampling probes in the stack. The probes shall be placed in the same horizontal plane, where the first probe tip is 2.5 cm from the outside edge of the other. One of the sampling trains shall be designated the spiked train and the other the unspiked train. Spike methanol into the impinger, and onto the adsorbent tube in the spiked train prior to sampling. The total mass of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent of the mass expected to be collected with the unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the two trains simultaneously. Analyze the impingers and adsorbents from the two trains utilizing identical analytical procedures and instrumentation. Determine the fraction of spiked methanol recovered (R) by combining the amount recovered in the impinger and in the adsorbent tube, using the equations in section 12.5. Recovery values must fall in the range: 0.70 <=R <=1.30. Report the R value in the test report. * * * * * Method 320--Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy * * * * * 9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as follows: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.010 Where: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.011 DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this value shall be >=10. SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration measured directly in undiluted spike gas. SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration measured in a spiked sample. Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the spike standard measured by filling the FTIR cell directly. CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples. Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples. * * * * * Method 323--Measurment of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method * * * * * 12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration Corrected to 15% Oxygen [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.012 * * * * * Method 325A--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler Deployment and VOC Sample Collection * * * * * 8.2.1.3 Extra samplers must be placed near known sources of VOCs if the potential emission source is within 50 meters (162 feet) of the boundary and the source location is between two monitors. Measure the distance (x) between the two monitors and place another monitor approximately halfway between (x/210 percent) the two monitors. Only one extra sampler is required between two monitors to account for the known source of VOCs. For example, in Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional monitors (i.e., light shaded sampler locations) and in Figure 8.2, the facility added two additional monitors to provide sufficient coverage of all area sources. [[Page 3655]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.013 * * * * * 8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring perimeter length greater than or equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling locations are spaced 610 76 meters (2,000 250 feet) apart. 8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation, permit or other requirement, for small disconnected subareas with known sources within 50 meters (162 feet) of the monitoring perimeter, sampling points need not be placed closer than 152 meters (500 feet) apart as long as a minimum of 3 monitoring locations are used for each subarea. * * * * * Method 325B--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler Preparation and Analysis * * * * * 9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the monitoring site with the sampling tubes and must be stored at the sampling location throughout the monitoring exercise. The field blanks must be installed under a protective hood/cover at the sampling location, but the long-term storage caps must remain in place throughout the monitoring period (see Method 325A). The field blanks are then shipped back to the laboratory in the same container as the sampled tubes. Collect at least two field blank samples per sampling period to ensure sample integrity associated with shipment, collection, and storage. * * * * * 9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a Sequence. Run CCV before each sequence of analyses and after every tenth sample to ensure that the previous multi-level calibration (see Section 10.0) is still valid. * * * * * 11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal desorption--GC/MS analytical method is changed or major equipment maintenance is performed, you must conduct a new five-level calibration (see Section 10.0). System calibration remains valid as long as results from subsequent CCV are within 30 percent of the most recent 5-point calibration (see Section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in the supporting information in the data report for each set of samples. * * * * * 12.2.2 Determine the equivalent concentrations of compounds in atmospheres as follows. Correct target compound concentrations determined at the sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure to standard conditions (25 [deg]C and 760 mm mercury) using Equation 12.5. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.014 Where: m meas = The mass of the compound as measured in the sorbent tube ([micro]g). t = The exposure time (minutes). [[Page 3656]] tss = The average temperature during the collection period at the sampling site (K). UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake rate (sampling rate) (mL/min). Note: Diffusive uptake rates (Ustd ) for common VOCs, using carbon sorbents packed into sorbent tubes of the dimensions specified in Section 6.1, are listed in Table 12.1. Adjust analytical conditions to keep expected sampled masses within range (see Sections 11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible method detection limits are typically in the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and 0.05 ppb for volatile aromatics such as benzene for 14-day monitoring. However, actual detection limits will depend upon the analytical conditions selected. * * * * * Table 17.1--Summary of GC/MS Analysis Quality Control Procedures ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Tune Daily \a\ prior to Evaluation criteria (1) Retune and or Performance Check. sample analysis. presented in Section (2) Perform 9.5 and Table 9.2. Maintenance. Five point calibration bracketing the Following any major (1) Percent Deviation (1) Repeat calibration expected sample concentration. change, repair or (%DEV) of response sample analysis. maintenance or if factors30%. check. meet method (2) Relative Retention (3) Prepare new requirements. Times (RRTs) for calibration standards Recalibration not to target peaks 0.06 units from repeat analysis. mean RRT. Calibration Verification (CCV Second Following the The response factor (1) Repeat calibration source calibration verification calibration curve. 30% DEV check. check). from calibration curve (2) Repeat calibration average response curve. factor. Laboratory Blank Analysis............ Daily \a\ following (1) <=0.2 ppbv per (1) Repeat analysis bromofluoro- benzene analyte or <=3 times with new blank tube. and calibration check; the LOD, whichever is (2) Check system for prior to sample greater. leaks, contamination. analysis. (2) Internal Standard (3) Analyze additional (IS) area response blank. 40% and IS Retention Time (RT) 0.33 min. of most recent calibration check. Blank Sorbent Tube Certification..... One tube analyzed for <0.2 ppbv per VOC Re-clean all tubes in each batch of tubes targeted compound or 3 batch and reanalyze. cleaned or 10 percent times the LOD, of tubes whichever is whichever is greater. greater. Samples--Internal Standards.......... All samples............ IS area response 40% and IS RT invalidation. 0.33 min. of most recent calibration validation. Field Blanks......................... Two per sampling period No greater than one- Flag Data for possible third of the measured invalidation due to target analyte or high blank bias. compliance limit.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \a\ Every 24 hours. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-00470 Filed 1-25-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![3636 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Committee, a statutory Federal Advisory To assist in the formulation of edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
Committee body.3 Given the significant comments, HUD encourages The EPA may publish any comment
role that manufactured housing plays in commenters to consider how HUD’s received to its public docket. Do not
providing affordable housing, HUD has manufactured housing regulatory submit electronically any information
determined that it should undertake a agenda may be streamlined to reduce or you consider to be Confidential
substantive review of all current and eliminate costs and overall burden Business Information (CBI) or other
planned federal regulation of while ensuring that HUD can continue information whose disclosure is
manufactured housing. This review is to meet its statutory responsibilities restricted by statute. Multimedia
intended to ensure that HUD can more under the Manufactured Home submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
effectively meet its responsibilities to construction and Safety Standards Act accompanied by a written comment.
facilitate the availability of affordable of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.), as The written comment is considered the
manufactured homes and encourage amended. official comment and should include
innovation and cost-effective Dated: January 8, 2018. discussion of all points you wish to
construction techniques for Dana T. Wade,
make. The EPA will generally not
manufactured housing while continuing consider comments or comment
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for
to protect consumers by ensuring Housing.
contents located outside of the primary
quality, durable, safe and affordable submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or
[FR Doc. 2018–01276 Filed 1–25–18; 8:45 am]
manufactured homes. other file sharing system). For
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
In conducting this review, HUD additional submission methods, the full
believes that it would benefit from EPA public comment policy,
information and perspectives among information about CBI or multimedia
state, local and tribal officials, experts in ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION submissions, and general guidance on
relevant disciplines, affected AGENCY making effective comments, please visit
stakeholders in the private sector and http://www.epa.gov/dockets/
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63 commenting-epa-dockets.
the public as a whole. HUD is, therefore,
requesting comment on all current and [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0510; FRL–9972–22– All documents in the docket are listed
planned regulatory actions affecting OAR] on the https://www.regulations.gov
manufactured housing. HUD RIN 2060–AS95
website. Although listed on the website,
specifically seeks comment on: some information is not publicly
• Rules listed in its Unified Agenda Revisions to Testing Regulations for available, e.g., CBI or other information
of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions Air Emission Sources whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
regulations, including rules to update its Certain other material, such as
Manufactured Home Construction and AGENCY: Environmental Protection copyrighted material, is not placed on
Safety Standards (FR–5739), and exempt Agency (EPA). the internet and will be publicly
Recreational Vehicles from its ACTION: Proposed rule. available only in hard copy. Publicly
Manufactured Home Construction and available docket materials are available
Safety Standards and Procedural and SUMMARY: This action proposes either electronically at http://
Enforcement Regulations (FR–5787). corrections and updates to regulations www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
for source testing of emissions. The the EPA Docket Center, Room 3334,
• How HUD should proceed with its
proposed rule includes corrections to EPA WJC West Building, 1301
Interpretative Bulletin that provides
testing provisions that contain Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
guidance for designing and installing
inaccuracies, updates to outdated DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is
manufactured home foundations in
procedures, and approved alternative open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
areas subject to freezing temperatures
procedures that provide testers Monday through Friday, excluding legal
with seasonal ground freezing.
enhanced flexibility. The revisions will holidays. The telephone number for the
• The effectiveness of HUD’s on-site improve the quality of data but will not
completion of construction regulations, Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
impose new substantive requirements and the telephone number for the EPA
its Subpart I notification and corrections on source owners or operators.
procedures, and its Alternative Docket Center is (202) 566–1742.
DATES: Comments. Written comments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Construction approval process, both
overall and specifically in review of must be received by March 27, 2018. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air Quality
manufactured homes with a carport- Public Hearing. The EPA will hold a Planning and Standards, Air Quality
ready design or any other similar design public hearing on this rule if requested. Assessment Division (E143–02),
that would permit the construction of an Requests for a hearing must be made by Environmental Protection Agency,
add-on at the final home site, that is not February 5, 2018. Requests for a hearing Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
structurally independent from the should be made to Mrs. Lula H. Melton telephone number: (919) 541–2910; fax
home’s structure, support and anchoring via email at melton.lula@epa.gov or by number: (919) 541–0516; email address:
systems. phone at (919) 541–2910. If a hearing is melton.lula@epa.gov.
requested, it will be held on February
HUD does not anticipate moving SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
26, 2018 at EPA Headquarters, William
forward with any manufactured housing The supplementary information in
Jefferson Clinton East Building, 1201
program regulations pending this preamble is organized as follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
completion of its review. HUD may I. General Information
DC 20004.
make exceptions, however, on A. Does this action apply to me?
individual rules based on policy ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
B. What action is the agency taking?
priorities or revised circumstances. identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– II. Background
OAR–2016–0510 at http:// III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
3 See HUD, Manufactured Housing Consensus www.regulations.gov. Follow the online A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
Committee, https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/ instructions for submitting comments. B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
housing/rmra/mhs/cc1. Once submitted, comments cannot be C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 3647
(RM) data when calculated using equation 13.0 Method Performance [Reserved] 2 Gases for short path IP cell interference
3–1. The results are also acceptable if the * * * * * tests cannot be added above 100 percent
result of Equation 3–2 is less than or equal stack equivalent concentration. Add these
Performance Specification 18—Performance gases at the indicated percentages to make
to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2). up the remaining cell volume.
Specifications and Test Procedures for
* * * * * Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) * * * * *
Performance Specification 11— Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at
Specifications and Test Procedures for Stationary Sources PS–18 Appendix A—Standard Addition
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission * * * * * Procedures
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources 11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD * * * * *
for each day must be less than 5.0 percent of
* * * * * the span value as specified in section 13.2 of 12.0 Reserved
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7
performance specification? Your daily PM
* * * * *
consecutive operating days.
CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate ■ 19. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and
* * * * *
that the daily drift of your PM CEMS does 5.1.2(3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F to
not deviate from the value of the reference
TABLE 1—INTERFERENCE TEST GAS part 60 to read as follows:
light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or
other technology-suitable reference standard
CONCENTRATIONS Appendix F to Part 60—Quality
by more than 2 percent of the response range. Assurance Procedures
Potential
If your CEMS includes diluent and/or Approximate concentration Procedure 1—Quality Assurance
interferent
auxiliary monitors (for temperature, pressure, (balance N2)
gas 1 Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
and/or moisture) that are employed as a Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance
necessary part of this performance CO2 ................ 15% ± 1% CO2.2 Determination
specification, you must determine the CO .................. 100 ± 20 ppm.
CH2O ............. 20 ± 5 ppm. * * * * *
calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see CH4 ................ 100 ± 20 ppm. 5.1.2 Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA). If
NH3 ................ 10 ± 5 ppm (extractive applicable, a CGA may be conducted in three
the appropriate performance specification for
CEMS only). of four calendar quarters, but in no more than
the diluent CEMS specification). None of the NO .................. 250 ± 50 ppm. three quarters in succession.
calibration drifts may exceed their individual SO2 ................ 200 ± 20 ppm. To conduct a CGA: (1) Challenge the CEMS
specification. O2 ................... 3% ± 1% O2.2 (both pollutant and diluent portions of the
* * * * * H2O ................ 10% ± 1% H2O.2
CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of
N2 ................... Balance.2
Performance Specification 15—Performance known concentration at two points within
1 Any of these specific gases can be tested
Specification for Extractive FTIR Continuous the following ranges:
Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary at a lower level if the manufacturer has pro-
Sources vided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field in-
* * * * * stallations.
Audit range
Audit point Diluent monitors for—
Pollutant monitors
CO2 O2
1 ...................................... 20 to 30% of span value ............................. 5 to 8% by volume ...................................... 4 to 6% by volume.
2 ...................................... 50 to 60% of span value ............................. 10 to 14% by volume .................................. 8 to 12% by volume.
Inject each of the audit gases, three times described in Citation 2. In the case that a § 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
each for a total of six injections. Inject the suitable audit gas level is not commercially * * * * *
gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may
is challenged. Do not inject the same gas
(g) * * *
be used to dilute CRM’s or EPA Protocol
concentration twice in succession. Gases to the needed level. The difference
(2) Contents of a performance test,
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit between the actual concentration of the audit CMS performance evaluation, or CMS
points 1 and 2. Do not dilute gas from audit gas and the concentration indicated by the quality assurance test report (electronic
cylinder when challenging the CEMS. monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the or paper submitted copy). Unless
The monitor should be challenged at each CEMS. otherwise specified in a relevant
audit point for a sufficient period of time to standard, test method, CMS
assure adsorption-desorption of the CEMS * * * * *
performance specification, or quality
sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION assurance requirement for a CMS, or as
(2) * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR otherwise approved by the
(CRM’s) (See Citation 1) audit gases that have POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE Administrator in writing, the report
been certified by comparison to National CATEGORIES shall include the elements identified in
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (vi) of this
Standard Reference Materials (SRM’s) or EPA ■ 20. The authority citation for part 63 section.
Protocol Gases following the most recent continues to read as follows: * * * * *
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for
Assay and Certification of Gaseous Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. (v) Where a test method, CMS
Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). performance specification, or on-going
Procedures for preparation of CRM’s are ■ 21. In § 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) quality assurance requirement for a
described in Citation 1. Procedures for introductory text and (g)(2)(v) to read as CMS requires you record or report, the
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are follows: following shall be included in your
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/12.svg)
![3648 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
report: Record of preparation of completion of the performance using Method 29, each run must consist
standards, record of calibrations, raw evaluation, unless otherwise specified of a minimum sample volume of 3
data sheets for field sampling, raw data in a relevant standard. dscm. When measuring PM
sheets for field and laboratory analyses, * * * * * concentration using either Method 5 or
chain-of-custody documentation, and 29, the probe and filter holder heating
example calculations for reported Subpart NNN—National Emission system must be set to provide a gas
results. Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants temperature no greater than 120 ±5 °C
* * * * * for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (248 ±9 °F).
■ 22. In § 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i)
■ 23. Revise § 63.1385(a)(5) to read as * * * * *
to read as follows:
follows:
§ 63.8 Monitoring requirements. Subpart DDDDD—National Emission
§ 63.1385 Test methods and procedures. Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
* * * * *
(e) * * * (a) * * * for Major Sources: Industrial,
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator (5) Method 5 or Method 29 (40 CFR Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
shall furnish the Administrator a copy part 60, appendix A–3) for the and Process Heaters
of a written report of the results of the concentration of total PM. When using
performance evaluation containing the Method 5, each run must consist of a * * * * *
information specified in § 63.7(g)(2)(i) minimum sample volume of 2 dry ■ 24. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD
through (vi) within 60 days of standard cubic meters (dscm). When of part 63 to read as follows:
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63—FUEL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
[As stated in § 63.7521, you must comply with the following requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in § 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator]
To conduct a fuel analysis for the You must . . . Using . . .
following pollutant . . .
1. Mercury ....................................... a. Collect fuel samples .................. Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or EPA 1631
or EPA 1631E or ASTM D6323 a (for solid), or EPA 821–R–01–013
(for liquid or solid), or ASTM D4177 a (for liquid), or ASTM D4057 a
(for liquid), or equivalent.
b. Composite fuel samples ............ Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
c. Prepare composited fuel sam- EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
ples. (for coal), ASTM D5198 a (for biomass), or EPA 3050 a (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821–R–01–013 a (for liquid or solid), or equivalent.
d. Determine heat content of the ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), or ASTM
fuel type. D5864 a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
e. Determine moisture content of ASTM D3173,a ASTM E871,a or ASTM D5864,a or ASTM D240, or
the fuel type. ASTM D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure mercury concentration ASTM D6722 a (for coal), EPA SW–846–7471B a or EPA 1631 or
in fuel sample. EPA 1631E (for solid samples), or EPA SW–846–7470A a or EPA
SW–846–7471B a (for liquid samples), or EPA 821–R–01–013 (for
liquid or solid), or equivalent.
g. Convert concentration into units For fuel mixtures use Equation 8 in § 63.7530.
of pounds of mercury per
MMBtu of heat content.
2. HCl .............................................. a. Collect fuel samples .................. Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or ASTM
D6323 a (for coal or biomass), ASTM D4177 a (for liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels), or equivalent.
b. Composite fuel samples ............ Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
c. Prepare composited fuel sam- EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
ples. (for coal), or ASTM D5198 a (for biomass), or EPA 3050 a or equiv-
alent.
d. Determine heat content of the ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), ASTM
fuel type. D5864, ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
e. Determine moisture content of ASTM D3173 a or ASTM E871,a or D5864,a or ASTM D240,a or
the fuel type. ASTM D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure chlorine concentration EPA SW–846–9250,a ASTM D6721,a ASTM D4208 a (for coal), or
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
in fuel sample. EPA SW–846–5050 a or ASTM E776 a (for solid fuel), or EPA SW–
846–9056 a or SW–846–9076 a (for solids or liquids) or equivalent.
g. Convert concentrations into For fuel mixtures use Equation 7 in § 63.7530 and convert from chlo-
units of pounds of HCl per rine to HCl by multiplying by 1.028.
MMBtu of heat content.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification for a. Measure mercury concentration Method 30B (M30B) at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–8 of this chapter
other gas 1 fuels. in the fuel sample and convert or ASTM D5954,a ASTM D6350,a ISO 6978–1:2003(E).a or ISO
to units of micrograms per cubic 6978–2:2003(E),a or EPA–1631 a or equivalent.
meter, or.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/13.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 3649
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63—FUEL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.7521, you must comply with the following requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in § 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator]
To conduct a fuel analysis for the You must . . . Using . . .
following pollutant . . .
b. Measure mercury concentration Method 29, 30A, or 30B (M29, M30A, or M30B) at 40 CFR part 60,
in the exhaust gas when firing appendix A–8 of this chapter or Method 101A or Method 102 at 40
only the other gas 1 fuel is fired CFR part 61, appendix B of this chapter, or ASTM Method D6784 a
in the boiler or process heater. or equivalent.
4. TSM ............................................. a. Collect fuel samples .................. Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or ASTM
D6323 a (for coal or biomass), or ASTM D4177,a (for liquid fuels)or
ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels),or equivalent.
b. Composite fuel samples ............ Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
c. Prepare composited fuel sam- EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
ples. (for coal), ASTM D5198 a or TAPPI T266 a (for biomass), or EPA
3050 a or equivalent.
d. Determine heat content of the ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), or ASTM
fuel type. D5864 a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
e. Determine moisture content of ASTM D3173 a or ASTM E871,a or D5864, or ASTM D240,a or ASTM
the fuel type. D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM
D4177 a (for liquid fuels) or ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure TSM concentration in ASTM D3683,a or ASTM D4606,a or ASTM D6357 a or EPA 200.8 a
fuel sample. or EPA SW–846–6020,a or EPA SW–846–6020A,a or EPA SW–
846–6010C,a EPA 7060 a or EPA 7060A a (for arsenic only), or
EPA SW–846–7740 a (for selenium only).
g. Convert concentrations into For fuel mixtures use Equation 9 in § 63.7530.
units of pounds of TSM per
MMBtu of heat content.
a Incorporated by reference, see § 63.14.
* * * * * (h) * * * front half filter temperature shall be
(7) * * * 160° ±5 °C (320° ±9 °F). The reportable
Subpart UUUUU—National Emission (i) * * * measurement output from the PM CEMS
Standards for Hazardous Air (1) Install and certify your PM CEMS must be expressed in units of the
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric according to the procedures and applicable emissions limit (e.g., lb/
Utility Steam Generating Units requirements in Performance MMBtu, lb/MWh).
Specification 11—Specifications and
■ 25. Revise § 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) to * * * * *
Test Procedures for Particulate Matter
read as follows:
Continuous Emission Monitoring ■ 26. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU
§ 63.10010 What are my monitoring, Systems at Stationary Sources in of part 63 to read as follows:
installation, operation, and maintenance Appendix B to part 60 of this chapter,
requirements? using Method 5 at Appendix A–3 to part
* * * * * 60 of this chapter and ensuring that the
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUUUU OF PART 63—PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS
[As stated in § 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources: 1]
To conduct a You must perform the following activities, as
performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- or output-based Using . . . 2
the following emission limit . . .
pollutant . . .
1. Filterable Particulate Emissions Testing ...... a. Select sampling ports location and the Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
matter (PM). number of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
of the stack gas. A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide con- Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
centrations of the stack gas. of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
1981.3
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/14.svg)
![3650 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUUUU OF PART 63—PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources: 1]
To conduct a You must perform the following activities, as
performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- or output-based Using . . . 2
the following emission limit . . .
pollutant . . .
e. Measure the filterable PM concentration .... Methods 5 and 5I at appendix A–3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure fabric filters, Method 5D
at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or 5I front half tem-
perature shall be 160° ±14 °C (320° ±25
°F).
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/ Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates. A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross out-
put data (see § 63.10007(e)).
OR OR
PM CEMS .................. a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the Performance Specification 11 at appendix B
PM CEMS. to part 60 of this chapter and Procedure 2
at appendix F to part 60 of this chapter.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture mon- (c), and (d).
itoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/ A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates. using mass emissions rate and gross out-
put data (see § 63.10007(e)).
2. Total or individual Emissions Testing ...... a. Select sampling ports location and the Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
non-Hg HAP metals. number of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
of the stack gas. A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide con- Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
centrations of the stack gas. of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
e. Measure the HAP metals emissions con- Method 29 at appendix A–8 to part 60 of this
centrations and determine each individual chapter. For liquid oil-fired units, Hg is in-
HAP metals emissions concentration, as cluded in HAP metals and you may use
well as the total filterable HAP metals Method 29, Method 30B at appendix A–8
emissions concentration and total HAP to part 60 of this chapter; for Method 29,
metals emissions concentration. you must report the front half and back half
results separately. When using Method 29,
report metals matrix spike and recovery
levels.
f. Convert emissions concentrations (indi- Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
vidual HAP metals, total filterable HAP A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
metals, and total HAP metals) to lb/MMBtu using mass emissions rate and gross out-
or lb/MWh emissions rates. put data (see § 63.10007(e)).
3. Hydrogen chloride Emissions Testing ...... a. Select sampling ports location and the Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
(HCl) and hydrogen number of traverse points. chapter.
fluoride (HF).
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
of the stack gas. A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide con- Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
centrations of the stack gas. of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
e. Measure the HCl and HF emissions con- Method 26 or Method 26A at appendix A–8
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
centrations. to part 60 of this chapter or Method 320 at
appendix A to part 63 of this chapter or
ASTM 6348–03 3 with
(1) the following conditions when using ASTM
D6348–03:
(A) The test plan preparation and implemen-
tation in the Annexes to ASTM D6348–03,
Sections A1 through A8 are mandatory;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/15.svg)
![3656 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
tss = The average temperature during the into sorbent tubes of the dimensions order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and 0.05
collection period at the sampling site (K). specified in Section 6.1, are listed in Table ppb for volatile aromatics such as benzene
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake 12.1. Adjust analytical conditions to keep for 14-day monitoring. However, actual
rate (sampling rate) (mL/min). expected sampled masses within range (see detection limits will depend upon the
Sections 11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible analytical conditions selected.
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (Ustd) for
common VOCs, using carbon sorbents packed method detection limits are typically in the * * * * *
TABLE 17.1—SUMMARY OF GC/MS ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action
Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Daily a prior to sample analysis .... Evaluation criteria presented in (1) Retune and or
Tune Performance Check. Section 9.5 and Table 9.2. (2) Perform Maintenance.
Five point calibration bracketing Following any major change, re- (1) Percent Deviation (%DEV) of (1) Repeat calibration sample
the expected sample concentra- pair or maintenance or if daily response factors ±30%. analysis.
tion. CCV does not meet method re- (2) Relative Retention Times (2) Repeat linearity check.
quirements. Recalibration not to (RRTs) for target peaks ±0.06 (3) Prepare new calibration stand-
exceed three months. units from mean RRT. ards as necessary and repeat
analysis.
Calibration Verification (CCV Sec- Following the calibration curve ..... The response factor ±30% DEV (1) Repeat calibration check.
ond source calibration from calibration curve average (2) Repeat calibration curve.
verification check). response factor.
Laboratory Blank Analysis ............. Daily a following bromofluoro- ben- (1) ≤0.2 ppbv per analyte or ≤3 (1) Repeat analysis with new
zene and calibration check; times the LOD, whichever is blank tube.
prior to sample analysis. greater. (2) Check system for leaks, con-
(2) Internal Standard (IS) area re- tamination.
sponse ±40% and IS Retention (3) Analyze additional blank.
Time (RT) ±0.33 min. of most
recent calibration check.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification ... One tube analyzed for each batch <0.2 ppbv per VOC targeted com- Re-clean all tubes in batch and
of tubes cleaned or 10 percent pound or 3 times the LOD, reanalyze.
of tubes whichever is greater. whichever is greater.
Samples—Internal Standards ........ All samples ................................... IS area response ±40% and IS Flag Data for possible invalida-
RT ±0.33 min. of most recent tion.
calibration validation.
Field Blanks ................................... Two per sampling period .............. No greater than one-third of the Flag Data for possible invalidation
measured target analyte or due to high blank bias.
compliance limit..
a Every 24 hours.
* * * * * implementation of emissions guidelines www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
[FR Doc. 2018–00470 Filed 1–25–18; 8:45 am] for existing commercial and industrial publish any comment received to its
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P solid waste incineration (CISWI) units public docket. Do not submit
within the jurisdiction of the State of electronically any information you
North Dakota. The plan creates new consider to be Confidential Business
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION enforceable emissions limits and Information (CBI) or other information
AGENCY operating procedures for existing CISWI whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
units within the State of North Dakota Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
40 CFR Part 62 in accordance with the requirements etc.) must be accompanied by a written
[EPA–R08–OAR–2017–0698; FRL–9972–54- established by the revised CISWI new comment. The written comment is
Region 8] source performance standards (NSPS) considered the official comment and
and emission guidelines (EG), should include discussion of all points
Approval and Promulgation of State promulgated by the EPA on March 21,
Plans for Designated Facilities and you wish to make. The EPA will
2011, with subsequent final generally not consider comments or
Pollutants; North Dakota; Control of amendments to the rule promulgated on
Emissions From Existing Commercial comment contents located outside of the
February 7, 2013. This proposed plan primary submission (i.e., on the web,
and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration approval rulemaking is being taken in
Units cloud, or other file sharing system). For
accordance with the requirements of
additional submission methods, the full
AGENCY: Environmental Protection sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA and
EPA public comment policy,
Agency (EPA). the relevant parts and subparts of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). information about CBI or multimedia
ACTION: Proposed rule. submissions, and general guidance on
DATES: Written comments must be
making effective comments, please visit
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection received on or before February 26, 2018.
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
commenting-epa-dockets.
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
plan (the ‘‘plan’’) submitted by the OAR–2017–0698 at http:// FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Division of Air Quality of the North www.regulations.gov. Follow the online Gregory Lohrke, Air Program, U.S.
Dakota Department of Health (the instructions for submitting comments. Environmental Protection Agency
‘‘Department’’) on June 12, 2014. The Once submitted, comments cannot be (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
plan would allow for the edited or removed from 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_3654/page/21.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-26 10:06:56
Document Modified: 2018-10-26 10:06:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments. Written comments must be received by March 27, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mrs. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143- 02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 3636 | |
| RIN Number | 2060-AS95 | |
| CFR Citation | 40
CFR
51 40 CFR 60 40 CFR 63 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Performance Specifications; Test Methods and Procedures and Incorporation by Reference |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR