83 FR 36655 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating To Formalization of the ICC Model Validation Framework
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 146 (July 30, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 146 (July 30, 2018)
| Page Range | 36655-36658 | |
| FR Document | 2018-16164 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 36655-36658] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-16164] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-83690; File No. SR-ICC-2018-004] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating To Formalization of the ICC Model Validation Framework July 24, 2018. I. Introduction On May 23, 2018, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to formalize the ICC Model Validation Framework. The proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2018.\3\ The Commission has not received any comments on the proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-83386 (June 6, 2018), 83 FR 27360 (June 12, 2018) (SR-ICC-2018-004) (``Notice''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change would formalize the ICC Model Validation Framework (``Framework''), which sets forth ICC's model validation procedures.\4\ Through the use of these model validation procedures, ICC determines the effectiveness of the risk models underpinning ICC's risk management system, considers new components and enhancements to existing components of the risk models, and monitors and validates on an ongoing basis the risk models. The Framework also describes the personnel responsible for, and the governance process associated with, the successful operation and maintenance of the model validation procedures. Specifically, the Framework designates ICC's Risk Oversight Officer (``ROO'') as the Framework owner and makes the ROO responsible to the ICC President for the successful operation and maintenance of the Framework.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined have the meaning set forth in the Framework and ICE Clear Europe rulebook, which is available at https://www.theice.com/clear-europe/regulation#rulebook. \5\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICC has a proprietary risk management system that uses models to assess the risk of the credit default swap-based portfolios that ICC clears. ICC uses its risk management system to determine the appropriate Initial Margin and Guaranty Fund requirements that offset the risks of the credit default swap-based portfolios ICC clears. The risk management system is composed of risk model components (``Model Components''), which employ a combination of statistical analysis of credit spread time series and stress test simulation scenarios to address different sources of risk. These sources of risk addressed by the Model Components constitute the foundation of total Initial Margin and Guaranty Fund requirements for the credit default swap-based portfolios that ICC clears.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Framework considers both new Model Components and enhancements to existing Model Components (collectively, ``Model Change''). New Model Components consider sources of risk that are not currently included in the risk management system.\7\ Enhancements to existing Model Components improve upon the methodologies already used by the risk management system to consider a given source or sources of risk.\8\ The Framework classifies Model Changes as either Materiality A or Materiality B, depending on how substantially the Model Change affects the risk management system's assessment of risk for the related source or sources of risk.\9\ Materiality A Model Changes substantially affect the risk management system's assessment of risk for the related source or sources of risk. Materiality B Model Changes do not substantially affect the risk management system's assessment of risk for the related source or sources of risk. The Framework requires that the ICC Chief Risk Officer (``CRO'') and the ROO review and determine which enhancements to the risk management system qualify as Model Changes and classify Model Changes as Materiality A or B.\10\ The Framework requires that the ICC Risk Committee review the materiality classifications and provide feedback as necessary.\11\ The Framework also describes the Model Inventory which is maintained by the ICC Risk Department and which contains key information about all Model Components and Model Changes.\12\ The Framework requires that the ICC ROO review the model [[Page 36656]] inventory at least quarterly to ensure that it contains accurate and up to date information relating to Model Components and Model Changes.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Id. \8\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. \9\ Id. \10\ Id. \11\ Id. \12\ Id. \13\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To assure the effectiveness of ICC's risk management system, the Framework employs four controls: Initial validation; ongoing monitoring and validation; investigation; and independent periodic review.\14\ Before going live with any Model Change, the Framework requires an initial validation of the conceptual soundness of the methodology and the proposed ongoing monitoring and validation approach.\15\ In addition, the Framework subjects Materiality A Model Changes to an additional independent initial validation.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. \15\ Id. \16\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ongoing monitoring and validation provides assurances that ICC has appropriately configured and calibrated the risk management system, including any recent Model Change, and that the risk management system is achieving the desired level of performance.\17\ Ongoing monitoring and validation consists of three areas: Parameter setting, execution monitoring, and outcome analysis.\18\ Through execution monitoring ICC reviews on a daily basis the changes generated by its risk management system and explains them in relation to known changes in cleared portfolios, prices, and market conditions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ Id. \18\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If ongoing monitoring and validation identifies features of the risk management system that might indicate weakness in a Model Component, the Framework requires ICC to investigate and identify the root cause.\19\ If weakness in a Model Component is discovered during investigation, the Framework requires the ICC CRO to inform the ICC Risk Committee of the results of the investigation.\20\ ICC must then remediate the identified weakness through an appropriate Model Change, which passes through the required steps of the Framework starting with an Initial validation.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. \20\ Id. \21\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Framework sets forth the process for selecting independent validators and describes the independent validator criteria, including technical expertise and independence requirements. The Framework requires that the ICC CRO provide support and information to allow the independent validators to perform periodic reviews of all Model Components and related practices at least once in every calendar year.\22\ At ICC's choosing, the scope of an independent periodic review may cover all Model Components used by the risk management system, or a subset of Model Components, as long as all Model Components are included in one or more independent periodic reviews each year.\23\ The independent periodic review must demonstrate that the Model Components remain fit for purpose; that the assumptions associated with the Model Components are still valid; that ICC has adequately addressed any open items of medium priority \24\ from Model Change initial validations and any other implementation conditions; and that ICC has been complying with its ongoing monitoring and validation requirements and the Model Components are performing without any significant weakness.\25\ The ICC CRO must present the periodic review to the ICC Risk Committee and describe ICC's plans in relation to any open high or medium priority items in the report.\26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ Id. \23\ Id. \24\ The Framework defines as medium priority those items that reflect deficiencies in the Model Components, assumptions, usage, or compliance with stated procedures that create risks that ICC can mitigate with viable workarounds until it remediates them fully, within a reasonable timeframe agreed with the Risk Committee. \25\ Notice, 83 FR at 27361. \26\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion and Commission Findings Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization.\27\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \28\ and Rules 17Ad-22(b)(2), 17Ad-22(b)(3), 17Ad-22(b)(4), and 17Ad- 22(d)(8) thereunder.\29\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C). \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). \29\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2)-(4), (d)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that the rules of ICC be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, as well as to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of ICC or for which it is responsible, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As described above, the Framework would provide a process for reviewing and enhancing ICC's risk management system. The Framework would also designate the personnel responsible for, and the governance process associated with, the successful operation and maintenance of the model validation procedures and would set forth the process and criteria for selecting independent validators. Taken together, the Commission believes these aspects of the Framework would help ensure that ICC's risk management system appropriately and effectively addresses the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios by providing ICC a means for reviewing and enhancing the risk management system as needed. In providing for independent validators, the Commission believes the Framework would help ensure that ICC receives unbiased and objective views regarding its risk management system, which would improve such review and enhancement. The Commission believes that both of these aspects of the Framework would improve the effectiveness of ICC's risk management system, thereby improving ICC's ability to manage the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios. Given that mismanagement of the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios could cause ICC to realize losses on such portfolios and disrupt ICC's ability to promptly and accurately clear security based swap transactions, the Commission believes that the Framework would promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. Similarly, given that mismanagement of the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios could cause ICC to realize losses on such portfolios and threaten ICC's ability to operate, thereby threatening access to securities and funds in ICC's control, the Commission believes that the Framework would help assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the ICC or for which it is responsible. Finally, for both of these reasons, the Commission believes the Framework would, in general, protect investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change would promote the prompt and accurate [[Page 36657]] clearance and settlement of securities transactions, assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in ICC's custody and control, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest, consistent with the Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2) Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2) requires that ICC establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to use margin requirements to limit its credit exposures to participants under normal market conditions and use risk-based models and parameters to set margin requirements and review such margin requirements and the related risk-based models and parameters at least monthly.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As described above, the Framework would describe how ICC would review and enhance its risk management system, including the selection and use of independent validators. In doing so, the Commission believes that the Framework would help ensure that ICC's risk management system is appropriate and effective for dealing with the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios. The Commission believes that the Framework would also enable ICC to improve its margin requirements by allowing ICC to review and improve the models that generate such margin requirements. The Commission believes that these aspects of the Framework would improve ICC's use of margin requirements to limit its credit exposures to participants under normal market conditions and ICC's use of risk-based models and parameters to set margin requirements. In addition, the Framework would describe ICC's process for execution monitoring, whereby ICC would review on a daily basis the changes generated by its risk management system and would explain those changes in relation to known changes in cleared portfolios, prices, and market conditions. The Framework would require ICC to then investigate any anomalies identified. In reviewing such changes and anomalies, the Commission believes ICC would review its margin requirements and the models that generate such requirements. Thus, the Commission believes the Framework would enable ICC to review its margin requirements and the models that generate such requirements on a daily basis. Therefore, for the above reasons the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2).\33\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(b)(3) Rule 17Ad-22(b)(3) requires that ICC establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to maintain sufficient financial resources to withstand, at a minimum, a default by the two participant families to which it has the largest exposures in extreme but plausible market conditions, in its capacity as a central counterparty for security-based swaps.\34\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As described above, the Framework would provide a process for reviewing and enhancing ICC's risk management system and would set forth the process and criteria for selecting independent validators. In doing so, the Commission believes that the Framework would help ensure that ICC's risk management system appropriately and effectively deals with the risks associated with clearing security based swap-related portfolios, including the risk associated with the default by the two participant families to which ICC has the largest exposures in extreme but plausible market conditions. The Commission believes that the Framework would also help ICC improve its guaranty fund requirements by allowing ICC to review and improve the models that generate such requirements. The Commission believes that these aspects of the Framework would help ensure that ICC effectively establishes and maintains financial resources sufficient to withstand, at a minimum, a default by the two participant families to which ICC has the largest exposures in extreme but plausible market conditions. Therefore, for the above reasons the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(b)(3).\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(b)(4) Rule 17Ad-22(b)(4) requires that ICC establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide for an annual model validation consisting of evaluating the performance of its margin models and the related parameters and assumptions associated with such models by a qualified person who is free from influence from the persons responsible for the development or operation of the models being validated.\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed above, the Framework would require the ICC CRO to provide support and information to allow independent validators to perform periodic reviews of all Model Components and related practices at least once in every calendar year. The Framework would further provide that the scope of an independent periodic review may cover all Model Components used by the risk management system, or a subset of Model Components, as long as all Model Components are included in one or more independent periodic reviews each year. The Framework would also provide the process and criteria (including independence) for selecting independent validators. Finally, the Framework would describe the required components of an independent review and the documentation required to be produced by the independent validators. The Commission believes these aspects of the Framework would enable ICC to validate the models underpinning its risk management system on an annual basis including the related parameters and assumptions associated with such models. The Commission also believes that by setting out the process and criteria (including independence) for selecting independent validators, the Framework would help ensure that such validations are performed by qualified persons free from influence from the persons responsible for the development or operation of the models being validated. Therefore, for the reasons described above the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad- 22(b)(4).\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- E. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(d)(8) Rule 17Ad-22(d)(8) requires that ICC establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent to fulfill the public interest requirements in Section 17A of the Act \38\ applicable to clearing agencies, to support the objectives of owners and participants, and to promote the effectiveness of the clearing agency's risk management procedures.\39\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1. \39\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed above, the Framework would describe the personnel responsible for, and the governance process associated with, the successful operation and maintenance of the model validation procedures. Specifically, the Framework would designate ICC's ROO [[Page 36658]] as the Framework owner and would make the ROO responsible to the ICC President for the successful operation and maintenance of the Framework. The Framework would also designate certain responsibilities to ICC's CRO and the Risk Committee. The Commission believes that in doing so the Framework would allow ICC to establish clear and transparent arrangements for governing the Framework and its model validation procedures. The Commission further believes that these same arrangements would contribute to ICC's fulfilling the public interest requirements in Section 17A of the Act \40\ applicable to clearing agencies, and the objectives of owners and participants. Finally, the Commission believes that these procedures and arrangements would promote the effectiveness of ICC's risk management procedures by clarifying the process for, and responsibilities associated with, using the Framework to improve ICC's risk management system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Therefore, for the above reasons the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(8).\41\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \42\ and Rules 17Ad-22(b)(2), 17Ad-22(b)(3), 17Ad-22(b)(4), and 17Ad- 22(d)(8) thereunder.\43\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). \43\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2)-(4), (d)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \44\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2018-004) be, and hereby is, approved.\45\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \45\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\46\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018-16164 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2018 / Notices 36655
17d–3 as if those rules applied to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE swap-based portfolios that ICC clears.
closed-end investment companies, COMMISSION ICC uses its risk management system to
which they believe will resolve any determine the appropriate Initial Margin
[Release No. 34–83690; File No. SR–ICC–
concerns that might arise in connection 2018–004]
and Guaranty Fund requirements that
with a Fund financing the distribution offset the risks of the credit default
of its shares through asset-based service Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE swap-based portfolios ICC clears. The
and/or distribution fees. Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving risk management system is composed of
Proposed Rule Change Relating To risk model components (‘‘Model
For the reasons stated above, Components’’), which employ a
applicants submit that the exemptions Formalization of the ICC Model
Validation Framework combination of statistical analysis of
requested under section 6(c) are credit spread time series and stress test
necessary and appropriate in the public July 24, 2018. simulation scenarios to address different
interest and are consistent with the sources of risk. These sources of risk
I. Introduction
protection of investors and the purposes addressed by the Model Components
fairly intended by the policy and On May 23, 2018, ICE Clear Credit constitute the foundation of total Initial
provisions of the Act. Applicants further LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities Margin and Guaranty Fund
submit that the relief requested and Exchange Commission requirements for the credit default
pursuant to section 23(c)(3) will be (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section swap-based portfolios that ICC clears.6
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act The Framework considers both new
consistent with the protection of
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 Model Components and enhancements
investors and will insure that applicants
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to to existing Model Components
do not unfairly discriminate against any formalize the ICC Model Validation
holders of the class of securities to be (collectively, ‘‘Model Change’’). New
Framework. The proposed rule change Model Components consider sources of
purchased. Finally, applicants state that was published in the Federal Register
the Funds’ imposition of asset-based risk that are not currently included in
on June 12, 2018.3 The Commission has the risk management system.7
service and/or distribution fees is not received any comments on the
consistent with the provisions, policies Enhancements to existing Model
proposed rule change. For the reasons Components improve upon the
and purposes of the Act and does not discussed below, the Commission is methodologies already used by the risk
involve participation on a basis different approving the proposed rule change.
management system to consider a given
from or less advantageous than that of
II. Description of the Proposed Rule source or sources of risk.8 The
other participants. Change Framework classifies Model Changes as
Applicants’ Condition The proposed rule change would either Materiality A or Materiality B,
formalize the ICC Model Validation depending on how substantially the
Applicants agree that any order Framework (‘‘Framework’’), which sets Model Change affects the risk
granting the requested relief will be forth ICC’s model validation management system’s assessment of risk
subject to the following condition: procedures.4 Through the use of these for the related source or sources of risk.9
Each Fund relying on the requested model validation procedures, ICC Materiality A Model Changes
order will comply with the provisions of determines the effectiveness of the risk substantially affect the risk management
rules 6c–10, 12b–1, 17d–3, 18f–3, 22d– models underpinning ICC’s risk system’s assessment of risk for the
1 and, where applicable, 11a–3 under management system, considers new related source or sources of risk.
the Act, as amended from time to time components and enhancements to Materiality B Model Changes do not
existing components of the risk models, substantially affect the risk management
or replaced, as if those rules applied to
and monitors and validates on an system’s assessment of risk for the
closed-end management investment
ongoing basis the risk models. The related source or sources of risk. The
companies, and will comply with
Framework also describes the personnel Framework requires that the ICC Chief
FINRA Rule 2341, as amended from Risk Officer (‘‘CRO’’) and the ROO
time to time, as if that rule applied to responsible for, and the governance
process associated with, the successful review and determine which
all closed-end management investment enhancements to the risk management
operation and maintenance of the model
companies. system qualify as Model Changes and
validation procedures. Specifically, the
For the Commission, by the Division of Framework designates ICC’s Risk classify Model Changes as Materiality A
Investment Management, under delegated Oversight Officer (‘‘ROO’’) as the or B.10 The Framework requires that the
authority. Framework owner and makes the ROO ICC Risk Committee review the
Eduardo A. Aleman, responsible to the ICC President for the materiality classifications and provide
Assistant Secretary. successful operation and maintenance feedback as necessary.11 The
of the Framework.5 Framework also describes the Model
[FR Doc. 2018–16154 Filed 7–27–18; 8:45 am]
ICC has a proprietary risk Inventory which is maintained by the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
management system that uses models to ICC Risk Department and which
assess the risk of the credit default contains key information about all
Model Components and Model
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Changes.12 The Framework requires that
2 17
CFR 240.19b–4. the ICC ROO review the model
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–83386
(June 6, 2018), 83 FR 27360 (June 12, 2018) (SR– 6 Id.
ICC–2018–004) (‘‘Notice’’). 7 Id.
4 Notice, 83 FR at 27361. Capitalized terms used
8 Notice, 83 FR at 27361.
herein but not otherwise defined have the meaning
9 Id.
set forth in the Framework and ICE Clear Europe
10 Id.
rulebook, which is available at https://
www.theice.com/clear-europe/regulation#rulebook. 11 Id.
5 Notice, 83 FR at 27361. 12 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:33 Jul 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM 30JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_36801/page/1.svg)
![36658 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2018 / Notices
as the Framework owner and would SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SUMMARY: This document announces a
make the ROO responsible to the ICC temporary decrease in the guarantee fees
[License No. 03/03–0249] that the U.S. Small Business
President for the successful operation
and maintenance of the Framework. The Administration (SBA) charges all Surety
Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P.;
Framework would also designate certain companies and Principals on each
Notice Seeking Exemption Under the
responsibilities to ICC’s CRO and the guaranteed bond (other than a bid bond)
Small Business Investment Act,
Risk Committee. The Commission issued in SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantee
Conflicts of Interest
believes that in doing so the Framework (SBG) Program.
would allow ICC to establish clear and Notice is hereby given that Argosy DATES:
transparent arrangements for governing Investment Partners IV, L.P., 950 West Applicability Date: The fee decreases
the Framework and its model validation Valley Road, Suite 2900, Wayne, PA described in this document will apply
procedures. The Commission further 19087, a Federal Licensee under the to all SBA surety bond guarantees
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, approved during the one year period
believes that these same arrangements
as amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection beginning October 1, 2018 and ending
would contribute to ICC’s fulfilling the
with the financing of a small concern, September 30, 2019.
public interest requirements in Section Comment Date: SBA must receive
has sought an exemption under Section
17A of the Act 40 applicable to clearing 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, comments on or before August 29, 2018.
agencies, and the objectives of owners Financings which Constitute Conflicts ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
and participants. Finally, the of Interest of the Small Business identified by Docket No. SBA–2018–
Commission believes that these Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 0007, by any of the following methods:
procedures and arrangements would Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Argosy (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
promote the effectiveness of ICC’s risk Investment Partners IV, L.P. is seeking www.regulations.gov, following the
management procedures by clarifying post-financing approval from SBA for instructions for submitting comments;
the process for, and responsibilities loan and equity financings it made to or (2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
associated with, using the Framework to POSC Holdings LLC, formerly known as Jermanne Perry, Surety Bond Specialist,
improve ICC’s risk management system. Panhandle Oilfield Service Companies, U.S. Small Business Administration,
Therefore, for the above reasons the Inc., 14000 Quail Springs Parkway, Office of Surety Guarantees, 409 Third
Commission finds that the proposed Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73134. Street SW, Suite 8600, Washington, DC
rule change is consistent with Rule The financing is brought within the 20416.
17Ad–22(d)(8).41 purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the SBA will post all comments on
Regulations because Argosy Investment www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
IV. Conclusion Partners V, L.P., an Associate of Argosy submit confidential business
Investment Partners IV, L.P., owns more information (CBI) as defined in the User
On the basis of the foregoing, the than ten percent of POSC Holdings LLC, Notice at www.regulations.gov, you
Commission finds that the proposal is and therefore this transaction is must submit such information to U.S.
consistent with the requirements of the considered Financing an Associate Small Business Administration,
Act, and in particular, with the requiring prior SBA approval. Argosy Jermanne Perry, Office of Surety
requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of Investment Partners IV, L.P. has already Guarantees, 409 Third Street SW,
the Act 42 and Rules 17Ad–22(b)(2), made its investments in POSC Holdings Washington, DC 20416 or send an email
17Ad–22(b)(3), 17Ad–22(b)(4), and LLC and is seeking post-financing SBA to jermanne.perry@sba.gov. Highlight
17Ad–22(d)(8) thereunder.43 approval. the information that you consider to be
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Notice is hereby given that any CBI and explain why you believe SBA
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 44 that the interested person may submit written should hold this information as
proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2018– comments on this transaction within confidential. SBA will review your
fifteen days of the date of this information and determine whether it
004) be, and hereby is, approved.45
publication to the Associate will make the information public.
For the Commission, by the Division of Administrator, Office of Investment and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Innovation, U.S. Small Business Jermanne Perry, Surety Bond Specialist,
authority.46 Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Office of Surety Guarantees, (202) 401–
Eduardo A. Aleman, Washington, DC 20416. 8275; jermanne.perry@sba.gov.
Assistant Secretary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under its
A. Joseph Shepard,
[FR Doc. 2018–16164 Filed 7–27–18; 8:45 am]
Associate Administrator for Office of
SBG Program, the SBA guarantees bid,
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Investment and Innovation. payment and performance bonds for
[FR Doc. 2018–16206 Filed 7–27–18; 8:45 am]
small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through
BILLING CODE P
regular commercial channels. SBA’s
guarantee gives Sureties an incentive to
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION provide bonding for small businesses
40 15
and, thereby, assists small businesses in
U.S.C. 78q–1.
41 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8).
[Docket No.: SBA–2018–0007] obtaining greater access to contracting
opportunities. SBA’s guarantee is an
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
42 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
Surety Bond Guarantee Program Fees agreement between a Surety and SBA
43 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2)–(4), (d)(8).
44 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). AGENCY: U.S. Small Business that SBA will assume a certain
45 In approving the proposed rule change, the Administration. percentage of the Surety’s loss should a
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on contractor default on the underlying
ACTION: Notification of temporary
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 contract. Pursuant to its statutory
initiative to test lower fees; request for
U.S.C. 78c(f). authority ‘‘to establish such fee or fees
public comments.
46 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). for small business concerns and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:33 Jul 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM 30JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_36801/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-07-28 01:44:30
Document Modified: 2018-07-28 01:44:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 36655 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR