83 FR 36876 - Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Court Decisions Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 147 (July 31, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 147 (July 31, 2018)
| Page Range | 36876-36878 | |
| FR Document | 2018-16338 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 36876-36878] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-16338] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-552-801] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Court Decisions Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 24, 2018, the United States Court of International Trade (Court) issued final judgments in Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00156, sustaining the Department of Commerce's (Commerce) remand results for the eighth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) covering the period of review (POR) August 1, 2010, through July 31, 2011. Commerce is notifying the public that the Court's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to certain exporters. DATES: Applicable June 3, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 21, 2013, Commerce issued its AR8 Final Results.\1\ On May 20, 2013, Commerce issued its AR8 Amended Final Results.\2\ Vinh Hoan et [[Page 36877]] al.\3\ and the petitioners \4\ timely filed complaints with the Court and challenged certain aspects of the AR8 Amended Final Results. On February 19, 2015, the Court remanded Commerce's AR8 Amended Final Results.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews; 2010-2011, 78 FR 17350 (March 21, 2013) (AR8 Final Results). \2\ See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 29323 (May 20, 2013) (AR8 Amended Final Results) and accompanying Ministerial Error Memorandum. \3\ These include Vinh Hoan, the Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers, Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company (Binh An), Anvifish and Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (Vinh Quang). \4\ Catfish Farmers of America and the following individual U.S. catfish processors: America's Catch, Consolidated Catfish Companies, LLC dba Country Select Catfish, Delta Pride Catfish, Inc., Harvest Select Catfish, Inc., Heartland Catfish Company, Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised Catfish, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners). \5\ See Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 15-16 (CIT February 19, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the first remand, in accordance with the Court's instructions, Commerce reconsidered its selection of the surrogate country, and the selection of certain surrogate values (SVs), i.e., whole live pangasius fish, surrogate financial statements, various by-products and several other SVs, as they relate to the selection of the surrogate country.\6\ Additionally, and in accordance with the Court's instructions, Commerce made changes to Vinh Hoan Corporation's \7\ (Vinh Hoan) margin calculation, specifically, by adjusting the denominators for Vinh Hoan's factors of production (FOPs) to exclude water weight, and adjusting the consignment expense for certain sales. Commerce made changes to the margin calculations of Vinh Hoan, Anvifish Joint Stock Company (Anvifish) and the separate rate respondents' margins to account for a small change in the whole live fish SV. Also, at Commerce's request, the Court granted Commerce a voluntary remand to reconsider the calculation of the cap applied to Vinh Hoan's fish oil by-product offset. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00156, and Slip Op. 15-16, dated August 3, 2015 (First Remand Results). \7\ Vinh Hoan was one of two mandatory respondents selected by Commerce. Vinh Hoan includes Vinh Hoan Corporation and its affiliates Van Duc Food Export Joint Company and Van Duc Tien Giang (VDTG). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 26, 2016, the Court remanded Commerce's First Remand Results.\8\ In the second remand, in accordance with the Court's instructions, Commerce reconsidered its selection of the sawdust and rice husk SVs, provided further explanation concerning the cap to the fish oil by-product offset, and discussed the use of the absolute value of by-products in the margin calculation.\9\ The Court upheld our findings on these issues, except one, the fish oil by-product offset.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 16-53 (CIT May 26, 2016). \9\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 16-00053, dated May 26, 2016 (Second Remand Results). \10\ See Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 17-00081 (July 10, 2017) (Vinh Hoan). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On July 10, 2017, the Court remanded Commerce's Second Remand Results.\11\ In the third remand, in accordance with the Court's instructions, Commerce provided further explanation with respect to the calculated fish oil by-product offset and its superiority with respect to the other fish oil SVs on the record.\12\ On September 22, 2017, Commerce filed the Third Remand Results with the Court. On May 24, 2018, the Court upheld the Third Remand Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United States, Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 17-81 (CIT July 10, 2017). \12\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant To Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 15-16 (CIT February 19, 2015), dated September 22, 2017, (Third Remand Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a result of the AR8 Remand Results,\13\ there are calculation changes. After accounting for all such changes and issues in the AR8 Remand Results, the resulting antidumping margin for Vinh Hoan is $0.13 per kilogram and $2.39 per kilogram for Anvifish. Because Vinh Hoan's and Anvifish's margins changed, their weighted average also becomes the margin ($1.28 per kilogram) for those companies not individually examined but receiving a separate rate. On May 24, 2018, the Court sustained the AR8 Remand Results.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See First Remand Results, Second Remand Results, and Third Remand Results (collectively AR8 Remand Results). \14\ See Vinh Hoan Corporation et a. v. United States, Court No. 13-00156, Slip Op. 18-59 (CIT May 24, 2018). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fish fillets from Vietnam covering the POR. Thus, Commerce is amending the AR8 Amended Final Results with respect to the weighted-average dumping margins for Vinh Hoan, Anvifish and the separate rate respondents.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ These include: An Giang Agriculture and Food Import-Export Joint Stock Company; Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Stock Company; Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company; Cadovimex II Seafood Import- Export and Processing Joint Stock Company; Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company; Hung Vuong Corporation; Nam Viet Corporation; NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company; QVD Food Company Ltd.; Saigon Mekong Fishery Co., Ltd.; Southern Fisheries Industries Company Ltd.; and Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (collectively, separate rate respondents). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timken Notice In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's May 24, 2018, judgment sustaining the AR8 Remand constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with Commerce's AR8 Amended Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirement of Timken. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending the AR8 Amended Final Results with respect to Vinh Hoan, Anvifish and the separate rate respondents. The revised weighted-average dumping margins for these exporters during the period August 1, 2010, through July 31, 2011, are as follows: [[Page 36878]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter dumping margin (dollars per kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vinh Hoan Corporation \16\.............................. 0.13 Anvifish Joint Stock Company \17\....................... 2.39 An Giang Agriculture and Food Import-Export Joint Stock 1.28 Company................................................ Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Stock Company............. 1.28 Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company..................... 1.28 Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint 1.28 Stock Company.......................................... Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company.................. 1.28 Hung Vuong Corporation.................................. 1.28 Nam Viet Corporation.................................... 1.28 NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company....................... 1.28 QVD Food Company Ltd \18\............................... 1.28 Saigon Mekong Fishery Co., Ltd.......................... 1.28 Southern Fisheries Industries Company Ltd............... 1.28 Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation........................ 1.28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Accordingly, Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise exported by the companies mentioned above using the assessment rate calculated by Commerce in the AR8 Remand Results and listed above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ This rate is applicable to the Vinh Hoan Group which includes: Vinh Hoan, Van Duc, and VDTG. \17\ Includes the trade name Anvifish Co., Ltd. \18\ This rate is also applicable to QVD Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. (Dong Thap) and Thuan Hung Co., Ltd. (THUFICO). In the second review of this order, Commerce found QVD, Dong Thap and THUFICO to be a single entity, and because there has been no evidence submitted on the record of this review that calls this determination into question, we continue to find these companies to be part of a single entity. Therefore, we will assign this rate to the companies in the single entity. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 53387 (September 11, 2006). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements Unless the applicable cash deposit rates have been superseded by cash deposit rates calculated in an intervening administrative review of the AD order on frozen fish fillets from Vietnam, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to require a cash deposit for estimated AD duties at the rate noted above for each specified exporter and producer combination, for entries of subject merchandise, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after June 3, 2018. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 20, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018-16338 Filed 7-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![36876 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Notices
destruction of proprietary information Commerce to issue the preliminary Dated: July 25, 2018.
disclosed under APO in accordance determination in a LTFV investigation Gary Taverman,
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written within 140 days after the date on which Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
notification of the return/destruction of Commerce initiated the investigation. and Countervailing Duty Operations,
APO materials or conversion to judicial However, section 733(c)(1)(A)(b)(1) of performing the non-exclusive functions and
protective order is hereby requested. the Act permits Commerce to postpone duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Failure to comply with the regulations the preliminary determination until no Enforcement and Compliance.
and terms of an APO is a violation later than 190 days after the date on [FR Doc. 2018–16334 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am]
which is subject to sanction. which Commerce initiated the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
This notice is issued and published in investigation if: (A) The petitioner
accordance with sections 751(a) and makes a timely request for a
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR postponement; or (B) Commerce DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
351.213(d)(4). concludes that the parties concerned are
International Trade Administration
Dated: July 25, 2018. cooperating, that the investigation is
James Maeder, extraordinarily complicated, and that [A–552–801]
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
additional time is necessary to make a
preliminary determination. Under 19 Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and submit a request for postponement 25 of Court Decisions Not in Harmony
Countervailing Duty Operations. days or more before the scheduled date With Final Results of Administrative
[FR Doc. 2018–16341 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] of the preliminary determination and Review and Notice of Amended Final
must state the reasons for the request. Results of Antidumping Duty
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Commerce will grant the request unless Administrative Review
it finds compelling reasons to deny the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE request. International Trade Administration,
On July 17, 2018, the petitioners 2 Department of Commerce.
International Trade Administration submitted a timely request that SUMMARY: On May 24, 2018, the United
[A–552–823] Commerce postpone the preliminary States Court of International Trade
determination in the LTFV (Court) issued final judgments in Vinh
Laminated Woven Sacks From the investigation.3 The petitioners stated Hoan Corporation et al. v. United
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: that they request postponement States, Consol. Court No. 13–00156,
Postponement of Preliminary ‘‘because the initial questionnaire sustaining the Department of
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair- responses submitted by the respondents Commerce’s (Commerce) remand results
Value Investigation in this investigation are substantially for the eighth administrative review of
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, deficient, and it may not be possible for the antidumping duty order on certain
International Trade Administration, {Commerce} to obtain usable corrected frozen fish fillets from the Socialist
Department of Commerce. responses within the current Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) covering
schedule.’’ 4 the period of review (POR) August 1,
DATES: Applicable July 31, 2018.
For the reasons stated above, and 2010, through July 31, 2011. Commerce
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
because there are no compelling reasons is notifying the public that the Court’s
Drew Jackson or Celeste Chen, AD/CVD final judgment is not in harmony with
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and to deny the request, Commerce, in
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of Commerce’s final results of the
Compliance, International Trade administrative review, and that
Administration, U.S. Department of the Act, is postponing the deadline for
the preliminary determination by 50 Commerce is amending the final results
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue with respect to certain exporters.
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
which this investigations was initiated). DATES: Applicable June 3, 2018.
(202) 482–4406 or (202) 482–0890,
respectively. As a result, Commerce will issue its FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
preliminary determination no later than Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: October 3, 2018. In accordance with Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
Background section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR International Trade Administration,
351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
On March 27, 2018, the Department of determination of this investigation will
Commerce (Commerce) initiated a less- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
continue to be 75 days after the date of DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243.
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of the preliminary determination, unless
imports of laminated woven sacks SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
postponed at a later date.
(LWS) from the Socialist Republic of Background
Vietnam (Vietnam).1 Currently, the This notice is issued and published
preliminary determination is due no pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act On March 21, 2013, Commerce issued
later than August 14, 2018. and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). its AR8 Final Results.1 On May 20,
2013, Commerce issued its AR8
Postponement of Preliminary 2 The petitioners are the Laminated Woven Sacks Amended Final Results.2 Vinh Hoan et
Determination
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Fair Trade Coalition and its individual members,
Polytex Fibers Corporation and ProAmpac Holdings 1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act Inc. Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Investigation of Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper
Laminated Woven Sacks From the Socialist Reviews; 2010–2011, 78 FR 17350 (March 21, 2013)
1 See Laminated Woven Sacks From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Petitioners’ Request For (AR8 Final Results).
Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair- Postponement Of The Preliminary Determination,’’ 2 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Value Investigation, 83 FR 14257 (April 3, 2018) dated July 17, 2018. Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Results of
(Initiation Notice). 4 Id. Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_37023/page/1.svg)
![36878 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Notices
Weighted-
average
dumping
Exporter margin
(dollars per
kilogram)
Vinh Hoan Corporation 16 .................................................................................................................................................................... 0.13
Anvifish Joint Stock Company 17 ......................................................................................................................................................... 2.39
An Giang Agriculture and Food Import-Export Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................ 1.28
Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................................................ 1.28
Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company .............................................................................................................................................. 1.28
Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint Stock Company .................................................................................... 1.28
Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company ........................................................................................................................................ 1.28
Hung Vuong Corporation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1.28
Nam Viet Corporation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1.28
NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................................................................ 1.28
QVD Food Company Ltd 18 ................................................................................................................................................................. 1.28
Saigon Mekong Fishery Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 1.28
Southern Fisheries Industries Company Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 1.28
Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation ...................................................................................................................................................... 1.28
Accordingly, Commerce will continue Notification to Interested Parties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the suspension of liquidation of the This notice is issued and published in Background
subject merchandise pending the accordance with sections 516A(e),
expiration of the period of appeal or, if On March 5, 2018, Commerce
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. published a notice of opportunity to
appealed, pending a final and
Dated: July 20, 2018. request an administrative review of the
conclusive court decision. In the event
the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if Gary Taverman, antidumping duty order on glycine from
appealed, upheld by the CAFC, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping China in the Federal Register. The
and Countervailing Duty Operations period of review covers March 1, 2017,
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
performing the non-exclusive functions and through February 28, 2018.1 On March
and Border Protection to assess duties of the Assistant Secretary for 30, 2018, in accordance with section
antidumping duties on unliquidated Enforcement and Compliance. 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
entries of subject merchandise exported [FR Doc. 2018–16338 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
by the companies mentioned above BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 351.213(b), Commerce received a timely
using the assessment rate calculated by request from GEO Specialty Chemicals,
Commerce in the AR8 Remand Results Inc. (GEO), a domestic producer of
and listed above. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE glycine, to conduct an administrative
Cash Deposit Requirements review of the order with respect to
International Trade Administration entries of subject merchandise made by
Unless the applicable cash deposit Kumar Industries, Rudraa International,
[A–570–836] Salvi Chemical Industries, Avid
rates have been superseded by cash
deposit rates calculated in an Organics Pvt. Ltd., and Baoding
Glycine From the People’s Republic of
intervening administrative review of the Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd.2 On
China: Rescission of Antidumping
AD order on frozen fish fillets from May 2, 2018, pursuant to this request, in
Duty Administrative Review; 2017–
Vietnam, Commerce will instruct U.S. accordance with section 751(a) of the
2018
Customs and Border Protection to Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
require a cash deposit for estimated AD AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, initiated a review of those companies.3
duties at the rate noted above for each International Trade Administration, On May 30, 2018, GEO filed a timely
specified exporter and producer Department of Commerce. withdrawal of its request of review for
combination, for entries of subject SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce each of the five companies.4 No other
merchandise, entered or withdrawn (Commerce) is rescinding the party requested an administrative
from warehouse, for consumption, on or administrative review of the review of this order.
after June 3, 2018. antidumping duty order on glycine from Rescission of Review
the People’s Republic of China (China) Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
16 This rate is applicable to the Vinh Hoan Group for the period March 1, 2017, through Secretary will rescind an administrative
which includes: Vinh Hoan, Van Duc, and VDTG. February 28, 2018, based on the timely review, in whole or in part, if the party
17 Includes the trade name Anvifish Co., Ltd.
withdrawal of the request for review. that requested the review withdraws the
18 This rate is also applicable to QVD Dong Thap
DATES: Applicable July 31, 2018.
Food Co., Ltd. (Dong Thap) and Thuan Hung Co.,
Ltd. (THUFICO). In the second review of this order, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Commerce found QVD, Dong Thap and THUFICO Edythe Artman or John Drury, AD/CVD Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
to be a single entity, and because there has been no to Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 9284
evidence submitted on the record of this review that
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and (March 5, 2018).
calls this determination into question, we continue Compliance, International Trade 2 See GEO’s Request for Review, dated March 30,
to find these companies to be part of a single entity. Administration, U.S. Department of 2018.
Therefore, we will assign this rate to the companies 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
in the single entity. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 19215 (May 2, 2018).
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative (202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–0195, 4 See Withdrawal of Request for Administrative
Review, 71 FR 53387 (September 11, 2006). respectively. Review, dated May 30, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_37023/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:29:49
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:29:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable June 3, 2018. | |
| Contact | Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 36876 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR