83_FR_37582 83 FR 37434 - Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Modification of Greenhouse Gas Language

83 FR 37434 - Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Modification of Greenhouse Gas Language

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 148 (August 1, 2018)

Page Range37434-37435
FR Document2018-16469

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing an approval to a revision to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to EPA on November 28, 2017. In this revision, WDNR makes modifications to the language associated with how greenhouse gases are evaluated in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. These revisions were made to reflect changes required by the United States Supreme Court in its June 23, 2014 decision, Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA), 134 S. Ct. 2427.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018) 
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37434-37435]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16469]



[[Page 37434]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0701; FRL-9981-44--Region 5]


Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Modification of Greenhouse Gas 
Language

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing an 
approval to a revision to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to 
EPA on November 28, 2017. In this revision, WDNR makes modifications to 
the language associated with how greenhouse gases are evaluated in the 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. These revisions 
were made to reflect changes required by the United States Supreme 
Court in its June 23, 2014 decision, Utility Air Regulatory Group 
(UARG) v. EPA), 134 S. Ct. 2427.

DATES: This final rule is effective on August 31, 2018.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0701. All documents in the docket are listed on 
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is 
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard 
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either 
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend 
that you telephone Rachel Rineheart, Environmental Engineer, at (312) 
886-7017 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Rineheart, Environmental 
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-7017, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    This final rulemaking addresses the November 28, 2017 WDNR 
submittal for SIP revision, revising the rules in the Wisconsin SIP to 
reflect the changes required by UARG v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, on how 
greenhouse gases are evaluated in the PSD program.
    On June 23, 2014, in UARG v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that the 
Clean Air Act (CAA) neither compels nor permits EPA to adopt an 
interpretation of the CAA requiring a source to obtain a PSD or title V 
permit based solely on its potential greenhouse gas emissions. The 
ruling supported EPA's decision to require sources otherwise subject to 
PSD review to comply with BACT emission standards for greenhouse gases. 
In other words, with respect to PSD, the ruling upheld PSD permitting 
requirements for greenhouse gases under Step 1 of the Tailoring rule 
for ``anyway'' sources, i.e., sources that were subject to PSD review 
anyway due to their non-greenhouse gas regulated pollutants, and 
invalidated PSD permitting requirement for Step 2 sources, i.e., 
sources that were considered major solely as a result of their 
greenhouse gas emissions.
    Following the UARG v. EPA decision, WDNR is modifying its PSD rules 
in NR 405.07(9) to establish the conditions under which greenhouse 
gases at a stationary source shall be subject to the PSD regulations.
    On May 25, 2018 (83 FR 24258), EPA published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) proposing approval of Wisconsin's November 28, 2017 
submittal for SIP revision on the basis that we found it consistent 
with the June 23, 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling.
    The specific details of Wisconsin's November 28, 2017 SIP revision 
and the rationale for EPA's approval are discussed in the NPRM and will 
not be restated here. EPA received three comments on the proposed 
action; none were relevant to the rulemaking.

II. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving Wisconsin's November 28, 2017 submittal for SIP 
revision as the modification to the greenhouse gas language in NR 
405.07(9) is consistent with the June 23, 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Wisconsin 
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents 
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region 
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further 
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

[[Page 37435]]

     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 1, 2018. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: July 17, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.


0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(126) 
introductory text and (c)(126)(i)(D) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.2570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (126) On May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012, and September 28, 2012, 
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) submitted a request to 
revise Wisconsin's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
program to incorporate the ``Tailoring Rule'' and the Federal deferral 
for biogenic CO2 emissions into Wisconsin's SIP. On November 
28, 2017, WDNR submitted a modification to the greenhouse gas language 
to be consistent with the June 23, 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling.
    (i) * * *
    (D) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 405.07 Review of major 
stationary sources and major modifications--source applicability and 
exemptions. NR 405.07(9), as published in the Wisconsin Administrative 
Register July 2015, No. 715, effective August 1, 2015.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-16469 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

37434 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: III. Incorporation by Reference AGENCY Throughout this document whenever In this rule, EPA is finalizing ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean regulatory text that includes 40 CFR Part 52 EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION incorporation by reference. In [EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0701; FRL–9981– section is arranged as follows: accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 44—Region 5] I. Background 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation II. What action is EPA taking? by reference of the Wisconsin Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; III. Incorporation by Reference Regulations described in the Modification of Greenhouse Gas IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth Language I. Background below. EPA has made, and will continue AGENCY: Environmental Protection This final rulemaking addresses the to make, these documents generally Agency (EPA). November 28, 2017 WDNR submittal for available through www.regulations.gov, SIP revision, revising the rules in the and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please ACTION: Final rule. Wisconsin SIP to reflect the changes contact the person identified in the FOR SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection required by UARG v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of Agency (EPA) is finalizing an approval 2427, on how greenhouse gases are this preamble for more information). to a revision to the Wisconsin State evaluated in the PSD program. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by On June 23, 2014, in UARG v. EPA, Reviews. the Wisconsin Department of Natural the Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Resources (WDNR) to EPA on November Air Act (CAA) neither compels nor Under the CAA, the Administrator is 28, 2017. In this revision, WDNR makes permits EPA to adopt an interpretation required to approve a SIP submission modifications to the language associated of the CAA requiring a source to obtain that complies with the provisions of the with how greenhouse gases are a PSD or title V permit based solely on CAA and applicable Federal regulations. evaluated in the Prevention of its potential greenhouse gas emissions. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. The ruling supported EPA’s decision to Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, These revisions were made to reflect require sources otherwise subject to PSD EPA’s role is to approve state choices, changes required by the United States review to comply with BACT emission provided that they meet the criteria of Supreme Court in its June 23, 2014 standards for greenhouse gases. In other the CAA. Accordingly, this action decision, Utility Air Regulatory Group words, with respect to PSD, the ruling merely approves state law as meeting (UARG) v. EPA), 134 S. Ct. 2427. upheld PSD permitting requirements for Federal requirements and does not greenhouse gases under Step 1 of the impose additional requirements beyond DATES: This final rule is effective on Tailoring rule for ‘‘anyway’’ sources, those imposed by state law. For that August 31, 2018. i.e., sources that were subject to PSD reason, this action: ADDRESSES: EPA has established a • Is not a significant regulatory action docket for this action under Docket ID review anyway due to their non- greenhouse gas regulated pollutants, subject to review by the Office of No. EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0701. All Management and Budget under documents in the docket are listed on and invalidated PSD permitting requirement for Step 2 sources, i.e., Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, the www.regulations.gov website. October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Although listed in the index, some sources that were considered major solely as a result of their greenhouse gas January 21, 2011); information is not publicly available, • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 i.e., Confidential Business Information emissions. Following the UARG v. EPA decision, FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory (CBI) or other information whose action because SIP approvals are disclosure is restricted by statute. WDNR is modifying its PSD rules in NR 405.07(9) to establish the conditions exempted under Executive Order 12866; Certain other material, such as • Does not impose an information copyrighted material, is not placed on under which greenhouse gases at a stationary source shall be subject to the collection burden under the provisions the internet and will be publicly of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 available only in hard copy form. PSD regulations. On May 25, 2018 (83 FR 24258), EPA U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Publicly available docket materials are • Is certified as not having a published a notice of proposed available either through significant economic impact on a rulemaking (NPRM) proposing approval www.regulations.gov or at the substantial number of small entities of Wisconsin’s November 28, 2017 Environmental Protection Agency, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 submittal for SIP revision on the basis Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); that we found it consistent with the West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, June 23, 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling. • Does not contain any unfunded Illinois 60604. This facility is open from The specific details of Wisconsin’s mandate or significantly or uniquely 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through November 28, 2017 SIP revision and the affect small governments, as described Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We rationale for EPA’s approval are in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act recommend that you telephone Rachel discussed in the NPRM and will not be of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Rineheart, Environmental Engineer, at restated here. EPA received three • Does not have Federalism (312) 886–7017 before visiting the comments on the proposed action; none implications as specified in Executive Region 5 office. were relevant to the rulemaking. Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1999); sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES Rachel Rineheart, Environmental II. What action is EPA taking? • Is not an economically significant Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air EPA is approving Wisconsin’s regulatory action based on health or Programs Branch (AR18J), November 28, 2017 submittal for SIP safety risks subject to Executive Order Environmental Protection Agency, revision as the modification to the 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, greenhouse gas language in NR • Is not a significant regulatory action Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–7017, 405.07(9) is consistent with the June 23, subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR rineheart.rachel@epa.gov. 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling. 28355, May 22, 2001); VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Jul 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 37435 • Is not subject to requirements of Dated: July 17, 2018. neighbor provision, with respect to the Section 12(d) of the National Cathy Stepp, primary 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) Technology Transfer and Advancement Regional Administrator, Region 5. national ambient air quality standard Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: (NAAQS). This action approves application of those requirements would Vermont’s demonstration that the State be inconsistent with the CAA; and PART 52—APPROVAL AND is meeting its obligations regarding the • Does not provide EPA with the PROMULGATION OF transport of SO2 emissions into other discretionary authority to address, as IMPLEMENTATION PLANS states. This action is being taken under appropriate, disproportionate human the Clean Air Act. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 health or environmental effects, using DATES: This rule is effective on August continues to read as follows: practicable and legally permissible 31, 2018. methods, under Executive Order 12898 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). ■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by docket for this action under Docket In addition, the SIP is not approved revising paragraphs (c)(126) Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR– to apply on any Indian reservation land introductory text and (c)(126)(i)(D) to 2014–0604. All documents in the docket or in any other area where EPA or an read as follows: are listed on the www.regulations.gov Indian tribe has demonstrated that a website. Although listed in the index, § 52.2570 Identification of plan. tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of some information is not publicly Indian country, the rule does not have * * * * * available, i.e., CBI or other information (c) * * * whose disclosure is restricted by statute. tribal implications and will not impose (126) On May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012, Certain other material, such as substantial direct costs on tribal and September 28, 2012, Wisconsin copyrighted material, is not placed on governments or preempt tribal law as Department of Natural Resources the internet and will be publicly specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 (WDNR) submitted a request to revise available only in hard copy form. FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Wisconsin’s Prevention of Significant Publicly available docket materials are The Congressional Review Act, 5 Deterioration (PSD) program to U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small available at www.regulations.gov or at incorporate the ‘‘Tailoring Rule’’ and the U.S. Environmental Protection Business Regulatory Enforcement the Federal deferral for biogenic CO2 Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides Agency, EPA New England Regional emissions into Wisconsin’s SIP. On Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, that before a rule may take effect, the November 28, 2017, WDNR submitted a agency promulgating the rule must Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office modification to the greenhouse gas Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA submit a rule report, which includes a language to be consistent with the June copy of the rule, to each House of the requests that if at all possible, you 23, 2014, UARG v. EPA ruling. contact the contact listed in the FOR Congress and to the Comptroller General (i) * * * FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to of the United States. EPA will submit a (D) Wisconsin Administrative Code, report containing this action and other schedule your inspection. The Regional NR 405.07 Review of major stationary required information to the U.S. Senate, Office’s official hours of business are sources and major modifications— the U.S. House of Representatives, and Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to source applicability and exemptions. the Comptroller General of the United 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. NR 405.07(9), as published in the States prior to publication of the rule in Wisconsin Administrative Register July FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Federal Register. A major rule 2015, No. 715, effective August 1, 2015. Donald Dahl, Air Permits, Toxics, and cannot take effect until 60 days after it Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. * * * * * is published in the Federal Register. [FR Doc. 2018–16469 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am] Environmental Protection Agency, EPA This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as New England Regional Office, 5 Post BILLING CODE 6560–50–P defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109—3912, Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION tel. (617) 918–1657; or by email at petitions for judicial review of this AGENCY dahl.donald@epa.gov. action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: circuit by October 1, 2018. Filing a 40 CFR Part 52 Throughout this document whenever petition for reconsideration by the [EPA–R01–OAR–2014–0604; FRL–9981– ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean Administrator of this final rule does not 23—Region 1] EPA. affect the finality of this action for the Table of Contents purposes of judicial review nor does it Air Plan Approval; Vermont; Infrastructure Requirement for the I. Background and Purpose extend the time within which a petition 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient II. Response to Comments for judicial review may be filed, and III. Final Action shall not postpone the effectiveness of Air Quality Standard IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews such rule or action. This action may not AGENCY: Environmental Protection be challenged later in proceedings to I. Background and Purpose Agency (EPA). enforce its requirements. (See section On November 2, 2015, the Vermont ACTION: Final rule. 307(b)(2).) Department of Environmental sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Conservation (VT DEC) submitted a Agency (EPA) is approving a State formal SIP revision certifying that its Environmental protection, Air Implementation Plan (SIP) revision SIP was adequate to meet the program pollution control, Incorporation by submitted by the State of Vermont. This elements required by Section 110(a)(2) reference, Intergovernmental relations, revision addresses the interstate of the CAA with respect to the 2008 Reporting and recordkeeping transport requirements of the Clean Air ozone, 2010 primary nitrogen dioxide requirements. Act (CAA), referred to as the good (NO2), and 2010 primary SO2 NAAQS VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Jul 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1


Document Created: 2018-08-01 01:23:22
Document Modified: 2018-08-01 01:23:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis final rule is effective on August 31, 2018.
ContactRachel Rineheart, Environmental Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-7017, [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 37434 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR