83 FR 39418 - Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission; 2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 154 (August 9, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 154 (August 9, 2018)
| Page Range | 39418-39420 | |
| FR Document | 2018-17048 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 39418-39420] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-17048] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-475-819] Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission; 2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain pasta from Italy. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 13, 2017, Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the CVD order on certain pasta from Italy for the POR.\1\ From October 10, 2017 to December 12, 2017, eight of the producers/exporters of subject merchandise subject to this review timely withdrew their request for review. Thus, we are rescinding this review with respect to these eight producers/exporters. Commerce is conducting this review of one remaining producer/exporter of subject merchandise: GR.A.M.M. S.r.l. [[Page 39419]] (GR.A.M.M.). On March 29, 2018, Commerce postponed the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this administrative review until August 3, 2018.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 29, 2018. \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from Italy; 2016,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The pasta covered by the scope of the order is typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying dimensions. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, ``in whole or in part, if a party that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review.'' The requests for review for the following companies were withdrawn within the 90-day limit: Alessio Panarese Soceieta Agricola, Antico Pastificio Morelli 1860 S.r.l., Colussi Spa, Ghigi 1870 S.p.A., Industria Alimentare Colavita, S.p.A., Pastificio Fratelli DeLuca S.r.l., Pastificio Mennucci SpA, and Tesa SrL.\5\ Therefore, Commerce is rescinding the review, in part, with respect to these companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Tesa SrL's, ``Pasta from Italy; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated October 10, 2017; see also Ghigi 1870 S.p.A.'s, ``Pasta from Italy; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated October 17, 2017; see also Industria Alimentare Colavita, S.p.A.'s Letter, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Request for CVD Administrative Review of Indalco S.p.A.,'' dated December 10, 2017; see also Pastificio Mennucci SpA's Letter, ``Pasta from Italy; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated December 12, 2017; see also Colussi Spa's Letter, ``Pasta from Italy; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated December 12, 2017; see also Alessio Panarese Soceieta Agricola's, Pastificio Fratelli DeLuca S.r.l.'s, and Antico Pastificio Morelli 1860 S.r.l.'s Letter, ``Certain Dry Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Withdrawal of Request for Review,'' dated December 12, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology We are conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we preliminarily find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\6\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution, section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit, and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Review We preliminarily find the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the mandatory respondent, GR.A.M.M. for the period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Net subsidy rate ad valorem ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GR.A.M.M. S.r.l........................... 1.21 percent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For companies for which this review is rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amount shown above for GR.A.M.M. with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits at the most recent company specific or all-others rate applicable to the company. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure and Public Comment We will disclose to parties in this review the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of publication of these preliminary results.\7\ Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) on the preliminary results no later than 30 days from the date of publication of this Federal Register notice, and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\8\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1). \9\ 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number [[Page 39420]] of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues addressed at the hearing will be limited to those raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the date and time for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\10\ Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their comments, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), unless this deadline is extended. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- These preliminary results and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 3, 2018. James Maeder, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Partial Rescission of the Administrative Review V. Subsidy Valuation Information VI. Analysis of Programs VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-17048 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![39418 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
Comment 45: Whether BC Hydro’s EPAs Comment 69: The Correct Calculation for Comment 97: Whether Commerce Erred in
are De Facto Specific the BC Hydro Power Smart TMP and Its Benefit Calculation for the IQ Loan
Comment 46: Whether Commerce Should Incentives Subprograms Guarantee to KEBLP
Include all Elements of Kruger’s Electric Comment 70: Whether Hydro-Québec’s IEO Company-Specific Issues
Service Rates in its Benchmark Program Is Specific Catalyst
Comment 47: Whether Hydro-Québec’s Comment 71: Whether Hydro-Québec’s Comment 98: How to Treat Catalyst’s
Purchase of Electricity for MTAR was Industrial Systems Program/Energy Unreported Log and Wood Fiber
Specific Efficiency Program is Countervailable Purchases
Comment 48: Whether the IESO Purchases Comment 72: Whether the Hydro-Québec Resolute
Electricity Special L Rate for Industrial Customers Comment 99: Whether Commerce Should
Comment 49: Whether the IESO’s Purchase Affected by Budworm Confers a Benefit Use Resolute’s Revised SR&ED Tax
of Electricity for MTAR is Specific Comment 73: Whether the IESO Demand Credit
Comment 50: Whether Commerce Should Response Is Specific White Birch
Countervail Tariff 29 and/or Use it as a Comment 74: Whether the Ontario IEI Comment 100: Whether Commerce
Program is Specific Correctly Determined the Dates of
Benchmark
Comment 75: Whether the Ontario IEI Approval for the MFOR Worker Training
Comment 51: Whether the Government of
Program is Tied to Non-Subject Grants to White Birch’s Stadacona Mill
Canada’s Provision of C$130 Million for
Merchandise Conclusion
Resolute’s Expropriated Assets Provides
a Benefit Comment 76: Whether Capacity Assistance [FR Doc. 2018–17017 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
Tax Program Issues Payments to CBPP Are Specific
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Comment 77: Whether the Capacity
Comment 52: Whether the ACCA for Class
Assistance Fees Paid to CBPP Provided
29 Assets Tax Program is Specific
a Benefit
Comment 53: Whether the School Tax DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Grant Program Issues: Other
Credit for Class 4 Major Industrial
Comment 78: Whether the Canada-BC Job
Properties Provides a Financial International Trade Administration
Grant Program is Specific
Contribution
Comment 79: Whether Emploi-Québec [C–475–819]
Comment 54: Whether the School Tax
Programs are Specific
Credit for Class 4 Major Industrial
Comment 80: Whether Emploi-Québec Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
Properties is Specific
Programs are Recurring Results of Countervailing Duty
Comment 55: Whether the Coloured Fuel
Comment 81: Whether the PCIP Provides a Administrative Review and Partial
Tax Rate Provides a Financial Benefit
Contribution Comment 82: Whether the Paix des Braves
Rescission; 2016
Comment 56: Whether the Coloured Fuel Program Provides a Countervailable
Tax Rate is Specific AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Benefit International Trade Administration,
Comment 57: Whether Catalyst Benefited Comment 83: Whether the Investment
from the Coloured Fuel Tax Rate Department of Commerce.
Program in Public Forests Affected by SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Comment 58: Whether the Powell River Natural or Anthropogenic Disturbance
City Tax Exemption Program Provides a Provides a Countervailable Benefit
(Commerce) is conducting an
Financial Contribution Comment 84: Whether the FPInnovations administrative review of the
Comment 59: The Appropriate Benefit Ash Development Project Provides a countervailing duty (CVD) order on
Calculation for the Powell River City Tax Countervailable Benefit certain pasta from Italy. The period of
Exemption Program Comment 85: Whether the PAREGES review (POR) is January 1, 2016,
Comment 60: Whether Commerce Properly Program is Specific and Confers a Benefit through December 31, 2016.
Determined the Amount of the Subsidy Comment 86: Whether the Ontario Forest
Kruger Received from Property Tax DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018.
Roads Funding Program is
Exemptions Countervailable FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comment 61: Whether the Québec SR&ED Comment 87: Whether the EcoPerformance Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations,
Tax Credit 18 is De Facto Specific Program is Specific and Confers a Benefit Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
Comment 62: Whether the Tax Credit for Equity Program Issues International Trade Administration,
the Acquisition of Manufacturing and Comment 88: Whether Preferred Shares U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Processing Equipment in Québec is Issued by Kruger Inc./KPPI in 2012 were Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
Specific Debt or Equity DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785.
Comment 63: Whether the Tax Credit for Comment 89: Whether Any Benefit in the
Pre-Competitive Research is Specific SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2012 Debt-to-Equity Conversion Is
Comment 64: Whether the Credit for Fees Attributable to Kruger Inc. Background
and Dues Paid to a Research Consortium Comment 90: How to Determine the
is Specific Benefit for KPPI’s 2012 Loan Forgiveness On September 13, 2017, Commerce
Comment 65: Whether Québec’s Tax Credit Comment 91: Whether IQ’s 2015 published a notice of initiation of an
for Construction and Repair of Roads and Investment in KHLP Was Tied to Non- administrative review of the CVD order
Bridges Provides a Financial Subject Merchandise on certain pasta from Italy for the POR.1
Contribution and a Benefit Comment 92: Whether the From October 10, 2017 to December 12,
Grant Program Issues: Electricity Equityworthiness Analysis for KHLP in 2017, eight of the producers/exporters of
Comment 66: Whether Agreements to 2015 is Correct subject merchandise subject to this
Curtail Consumption of Electricity are Comment 93: Whether KHLP was
Grants
review timely withdrew their request for
Equityworthy
Comment 67: Whether the Power Smart Loan Program Issues
review. Thus, we are rescinding this
Subprograms are De Jure/De Facto Comment 94: Whether CBPP was review with respect to these eight
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Specific Creditworthy producers/exporters. Commerce is
Comment 68: The Appropriate Benefit for Comment 95: Whether Commerce Erred in conducting this review of one remaining
the Power Smart: Load Curtailment Calculating the Benchmark for CBPP’s producer/exporter of subject
Program 2014 Loan merchandise: GR.A.M.M. S.r.l.
Comment 96: Whether Interest Due from
18 Also called the Québec Scientific Research and the Government of Newfoundland and 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Development Tax Credit in the Preliminary Labrador Loan to CBPP and Paid in 2017 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
Determination. Provided No Benefit in the POI 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Aug 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM 09AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39572/page/1.svg)
![39420 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
of participants; and (3) a list of the invite interested parties to comment on Specifically, MSG that has been blended
issues to be discussed. Issues addressed these preliminary results. or is in solution with other product(s) is
at the hearing will be limited to those DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018. included in this scope when the
raised in the briefs. If a request for a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: resulting mix contains 15 percent or
hearing is made, parties will be notified Chloee Sagmoe or Kathryn Wallace, AD/ more of MSG by dry weight. Products
of the date and time for the hearing to CVD Operations, Office VII, with which MSG may be blended
be held at the U.S. Department of Enforcement and Compliance, include, but are not limited to, salts,
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue International Trade Administration, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and
NW, Washington, DC 20230.10 Department of Commerce, 1401 various seasonings. Further, MSG is
Commerce intends to issue the final Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, included in this order regardless of
results of this administrative review, DC 20230; telephone at (202) 482–2000 physical form (including, but not
including the results of our analysis of or (202) 482–6251. limited to, in monohydrate or
the issues raised by the parties in their anhydrous form, or as substrates,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
comments, no later than 120 days after solutions, dry powders of any particle
the date of publication of this notice, Background size, or unfinished forms such as MSG
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the On November 1, 2017, Commerce slurry), end-use application, or
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), unless this published a notice of opportunity to packaging. MSG in monohydrate form
deadline is extended. request an administrative review of the has a molecular formula of
These preliminary results and notice C5H8NO4Na—H2O, a Chemical Abstract
antidumping duty order on
are issued and published in accordance Service (CAS) registry number of 6106–
monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 04–3, and a Unique Ingredient Identifier
People’s Republic of China (China).1 In
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). (UNII) number of W81N5U6R6U. MSG
response, on November 30, 2017,
Dated: August 3, 2018. Ajinomoto North America, Inc. (the in anhydrous form has a molecular
James Maeder, petitioner) requested a review of 27 formula of C5H8NO4Na, a CAS registry
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for companies.2 Commerce initiated a number of l42–47–2, and a UNII number
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty review of all 27 companies on January of C3C196L9FG. Merchandise covered
Operations performing the duties of Deputy 11, 2018.3 For a list of these companies, by the scope of this order is currently
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and see the Appendix to this notice. The classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Countervailing Duty Operations.
deadline for interested parties to submit Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
Appendix an SRA or an SRC was February 11, at subheading 2922.42.10.00.
2018.4 No party submitted an SRA or an Merchandise subject to the order may
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary also enter under HTS subheadings
Decision Memorandum: SRC. On May 5, 2018, the petitioner
requested that Commerce place the 2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00,
I. Summary
II. Background Remand Redetermination of the 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00,
III. Scope of the Order investigation of MSG from China 5 on 2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. The
IV. Partial Rescission of the Administrative the record of this proceeding.6 The tariff classifications, CAS registry
Review petitioners asked that Commerce utilize numbers, and UNII numbers are
V. Subsidy Valuation Information
the recalculated dumping margin of provided for convenience and customs
VI. Analysis of Programs purposes; however, the written
VII. Recommendation mandatory respondent, Meihua Bio-
Technology Co., Ltd. (Mehia), as the description of the scope is dispositive.8
[FR Doc. 2018–17048 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
basis for the China-wide entity rate.7 No Methodology
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
other party filed comments.
Commerce is conducting this review
Scope of the Order in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE The product covered by this order is of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
International Trade Administration MSG, whether or not blended or in (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213.
solution with other products.
[A–570–992] Preliminary Results of Review
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Monosodium Glutamate From the As noted above, the petitioner asked
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
People’s Republic of China: to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 50620
Commerce to place the Remand
Preliminary Results of the (November 1, 2017). Redetermination on the record of this
Antidumping Duty Administrative
2 See Ajinomoto’s letter, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate proceeding and to use that information
Review; 2016–2017
from China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ to calculate a dumping margin for the
(November 30, 2017), at Attachment 1 (listing 27 China-wide entity equal to the highest
companies for which Ajinomoto sought a review).
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and transaction-specific margin calculated
International Trade Administration, Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR for Meihua.9 We have not done so.
Department of Commerce. 1329 (January 11, 2018) (Initiation Notice). Commerce no longer considers the non-
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 4 See Initiation Notice.
market economy (NME) entity as an
(Commerce) preliminarily determines 5 See Remand Redetermination in the
exporter conditionally subject to an
that the 27 companies subject to this Antidumping Duty Investigation of Monosodium
Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China:
antidumping duty administrative
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
administrative review are part of the Analysis Memorandum for Langfang Meihua Bio-
China-wide entity because none filed a Technology Co., Ltd. dated August 7, 2017 filed in 8 See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s
separate rate application (SRA) and/or a the Ajinomoto North America, Inc. v. United States, Republic of China: Second Amended Final
separate rate certification (SRC). The Court No. 14–00351, Slip Op. 17–48 (April 25, Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
2017) (Remand Redetermination). Amended Antidumping Order, 80 FR 487 (January
period of review (POR) is November 1, 6 See Ajinomoto’s letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 6, 2015).
2016, through October 31, 2017. We Review of Monosodium Glutamate from China: 9 See Ajinomoto’s letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Comments on PRC-Wide AFA Rate,’’ (May 7, 2018). Review of Monosodium Glutamate from China:
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 7 Id. Comments on PRC-Wide AFA Rate,’’ (May 7, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Aug 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM 09AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39572/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-09 01:11:15
Document Modified: 2018-08-09 01:11:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable August 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39418 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR