83 FR 39671 - Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in Part, and Intent To Rescind, in Part; 2015-16
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 39671-39673 | |
| FR Document | 2018-17156 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 39671-39673] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-17156] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-580-879] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in Part, and Intent To Rescind, in Part; 2015-16 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is November 6, 2015, through December 31, 2016. We preliminarily determine that Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd/Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu) and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) received countervailable subsidies during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 and (202) 482-1396, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 13, 2017, Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the CVD order on CORE from Korea.\1\ On June 20, 2018, Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary results to August 3, 2018.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included at the Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). See also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 48051 (October 16, 2017) (Initiation Notice Correction), at footnote 8. \2\ See Memorandum regarding Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review--2015-2016, dated March 23, 2018; see also Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Administrative Review-- 2015-2016,'' dated June 20, 2018. \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in Part, and Intent to Rescind, in Part; 2015-2016: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain corrosion-resistant steel products. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part Commerce initiated a review of 22 companies in this segment of the proceeding.\4\ Two of these companies, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Union Steel Manufacturing Co. Ltd. are not subject to the CVD order on CORE from Korea.\5\ Accordingly, we are rescinding the review with respect to these two companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Initiation Notice and Initiation Notice Correction. The 22 companies were: Bukook Steel Co., Ltd.; CJ Korea Express; DK Dongshin Co., Ltd.; Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Dongbu Incheon (collectively, Dongbu) Steel Co., Ltd.; Dongbu Express; Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.; Hongyi (HK) Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Hyundai Steel; Jeil Sanup Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi International Corp.; POSCO; POSCO C&C; POSCO Daewoo Corp.; Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd.; SeAH Steel, Seil Steel Co., Ltd.; Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd.; Taisan Construction Co., Ltd.; TCC Steel Co., Ltd.; Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; and Young Sun Steel Co. \5\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part Based on information submitted by Mitsubishi International Corporation after the initiation of this administrative review, and because there is no evidence on the record to indicate that [[Page 39672]] this company had entries of subject merchandise during the POR, we preliminarily intend to rescind the review with respect to Mitsubishi International Corporation.\6\ A final decision regarding whether to rescind the review of this company will be issued with the final results of review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\7\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Companies Not Selected for Individual Review For the companies not selected for individual review, because the rates calculated for Dongbu and Hyundai Steel were above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we applied a subsidy rate based on a weighted-average of the subsidy rates calculated for Dongbu and Hyundai Steel using publicly ranged sales data submitted by respondents. This is consistent with the methodology that we would use in an investigation to establish the all-others rate, consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Preliminary Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily determine that the following subsidy rates exist for the 2015 and 2016 periods. The 2015 rate applies to the November 6, 2015, through December 31, 2015, period when liquidation of entries was suspended. The 2016 rate applies to entries suspended during 2016 and to establish the cash deposit rate for exports of subject merchandise subsequent to the final results. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Company ------------------------------- 2015 2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd./Dongbu Incheon 7.63 8.47 Steel Co., Ltd......................... Hyundai Steel Company................... 0.55 0.57 Bukook Steel Co., Ltd................... 3.09 3.34 CJ Korea Express........................ 3.09 3.34 DK Dongshin Co., Ltd.................... 3.09 3.34 Dongbu Express.......................... 3.09 3.34 Hongyi (HK) Hardware Products Co., Ltd.. 3.09 3.34 Jeil Sanup Co., Ltd..................... 3.09 3.34 POSCO................................... 3.09 3.34 POSCO C&C............................... 3.09 3.34 POSCO Daewoo Corp....................... 3.09 3.34 Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd................ 3.09 3.34 SeAH Steel.............................. 3.09 3.34 Seil Steel Co., Ltd..................... 3.09 3.34 Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd.............. 3.09 3.34 Taisan Construction Co., Ltd............ 3.09 3.34 TCC Steel Co., Ltd...................... 3.09 3.34 Young Sun Steel Co...................... 3.09 3.34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. For companies for which this review is rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries without regard to countervailing duties. Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice. Cash Deposit Rate Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amount indicated above with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure and Public Comment We will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\8\ Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) within 30 days of publication of the preliminary results and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\9\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 224(b). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must do so within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results by submitting a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system.\11\ Requests should contain the party's [[Page 39673]] name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined.\12\ Issues addressed during the hearing will be limited to those raised in the briefs.\13\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310. \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parties are reminded that all briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using ACCESS and received successfully in their entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their comments, within 120 days after publication of these preliminary results. This administrative review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: August 3, 2018. James Maeder, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Review IV. Scope of the Order V. Rescission of the 2015-2016 Administrative Review, in Part VI. Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part VII. Rate for Non-Examined Companies VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information IX. Analysis of Programs X. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-17156 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39671
comments, within 120 days after DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
publication of these preliminary results. discussed in the Preliminary Decision
International Trade Administration Memorandum is included at the
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Appendix to this notice. The
Requirement Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
[C–580–879]
Upon issuance of the final results, public document and is on file
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel electronically via Enforcement and
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Products From the Republic of Korea: Compliance’s Antidumping and
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Countervailing Duty Centralized
shall assess, countervailing duties on all Duty Administrative Review, Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
appropriate entries covered by this Rescission of Review, in Part, and ACCESS is available to registered users
review. We intend to issue instructions Intent To Rescind, in Part; 2015–16 at http://access.trade.gov and is
to CBP 15 days after publication of the available to all parties in the Central
final results of review. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce building. In
Act, Commerce also intends to instruct U.S. Department of Commerce. addition, a complete version of the
CBP to collect cash deposits of SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
estimated countervailing duties, in the (Commerce) is conducting an be accessed directly at http://
amounts shown above, for each of the administrative review of the enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
respective companies shown above, on countervailing duty (CVD) order on and electronic versions of the
shipments of subject merchandise certain corrosion-resistant steel Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, products (CORE) from the Republic of identical in content.
for consumption on or after the date of Korea (Korea). The period of review
(POR) is November 6, 2015, through Scope of the Order
publication of the final results of this
December 31, 2016. We preliminarily The merchandise covered by the order
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we is certain corrosion-resistant steel
determine that Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd/
will instruct CBP to continue to collect Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. products. For a complete description of
cash deposits at the most-recent (Dongbu) and Hyundai Steel Company the scope of the order, see the
company-specific or all-others rate (Hyundai Steel) received Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
applicable to the company, as countervailable subsidies during the
appropriate. These cash deposit Rescission of Administrative Review, in
POR. Interested parties are invited to Part
requirements, when imposed, shall comment on these preliminary results.
remain in effect until further notice. Commerce initiated a review of 22
DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
These preliminary results of review companies in this segment of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: proceeding.4 Two of these companies,
are issued and published in accordance Myrna Lobo or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/CVD
with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Union
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Steel Manufacturing Co. Ltd. are not
the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Compliance, International Trade subject to the CVD order on CORE from
Dated: August 3, 2018. Administration, U.S. Department of Korea.5 Accordingly, we are rescinding
James Maeder, Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue the review with respect to these two
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: companies.
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
(202) 482–2371 and (202) 482–1396,
respectively. Intent To Rescind Administrative
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
Review, in Part
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Countervailing Duty Operations. Based on information submitted by
Background Mitsubishi International Corporation
On September 13, 2017, Commerce after the initiation of this administrative
Appendix published a notice of initiation of an review, and because there is no
administrative review of the CVD order evidence on the record to indicate that
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum on CORE from Korea.1 On June 20, 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
2018, Commerce extended the deadline the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty
I. Summary
for the preliminary results to August 3, Administrative Review, Rescission of Review, in
II. Background
2018.2 For a complete description of the Part, and Intent to Rescind, in Part; 2015–2016:
III. Scope of the Order Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
events that followed the initiation of
Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and
V. Analysis of Programs
this review, see the Preliminary hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
VI. Verification Decision Memorandum).
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and 4 See Initiation Notice and Initiation Notice
VII. Conclusion
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR Correction. The 22 companies were: Bukook Steel
[FR Doc. 2018–17161 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). See Co., Ltd.; CJ Korea Express; DK Dongshin Co., Ltd.;
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Dongbu Incheon
Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 48051 (October (collectively, Dongbu) Steel Co., Ltd.; Dongbu
16, 2017) (Initiation Notice Correction), at footnote Express; Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.; Hongyi (HK)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
8. Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Hyundai Steel; Jeil
2 See Memorandum regarding Corrosion-Resistant Sanup Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi International Corp.;
Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: POSCO; POSCO C&C; POSCO Daewoo Corp.;
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd.; SeAH Steel, Seil Steel
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review—2015– Co., Ltd.; Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd.; Taisan
2016, dated March 23, 2018; see also Memorandum, Construction Co., Ltd.; TCC Steel Co., Ltd.; Union
‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; and Young Sun Steel
Countervailing Administrative Review—2015– Co.
2016,’’ dated June 20, 2018. 5 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39826/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39673
name, address, and telephone number, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Preliminary Determination of No
the number of participants, whether any Shipments
participant is a foreign national, and a International Trade Administration
Six companies that received a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a [A–570–900] separate rate in previous segments of the
request for a hearing is made, Commerce proceeding and are subject to this
will inform parties of the scheduled Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof review reported that they did not have
date of the hearing which will be held From the People’s Republic of China: any exports of subject merchandise
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Preliminary Results of Antidumping during the POR.2 We requested that U.S.
1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Duty Administrative Review; 2016– Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 2017 report any contrary information.3 To
date to be determined.12 Issues AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, date, we have not received any contrary
addressed during the hearing will be International Trade Administration, information from either CBP in response
limited to those raised in the briefs.13 Department of Commerce. to our inquiry or any other sources that
Parties should confirm by telephone the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
these companies had any shipments of
date, time, and location of the hearing (Commerce) preliminarily finds that the subject merchandise sold to the
two days before the scheduled date. certain companies covered by this United States during the POR.4 Further,
administrative review made sales of consistent with our practice, we find
Parties are reminded that all briefs
subject merchandise at less than normal that it is not appropriate to rescind the
and hearing requests must be filed review with respect to these companies
electronically using ACCESS and value.
but, rather, to complete the review and
received successfully in their entirety by DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
issue appropriate instructions to CBP
5 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: based on the final results of review.5
Unless the deadline is extended Yang Jin Chun or Joshua Poole, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Separate Rates
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act, Commerce intends to issue the final Compliance, International Trade Commerce preliminarily determines
results of this administrative review, Administration, U.S. Department of that 14 respondents are eligible to
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue receive separate rates in this review.6
including the results of our analysis of
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
the issues raised by the parties in their Separate Rates for Eligible Non-
(202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–1293,
comments, within 120 days after respectively. Selected Respondents
publication of these preliminary results.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because we denied the separate rate
This administrative review and notice eligibility for the two respondents
are in accordance with sections Background selected for individual examination,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Commerce is conducting an Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools
CFR 351.213. administrative review of the Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Danyang
Dated: August 3, 2018. antidumping duty order on diamond Huachang) and Jiangsu Youhe Tool
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond Manufacturer Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Youhe),
James Maeder,
sawblades) from the People’s Republic and treated them as part of the China-
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for of China (China). The period of review wide entity, we preliminarily applied to
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty non-selected respondents the separate
(POR) is November 1, 2016, through
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
October 31, 2017. Commerce has rate assigned to eligible respondents in
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations. preliminarily determined that certain the last completed administrative
companies covered by this review made review, which is 82.05 percent.7
Appendix sales of subject merchandise at less than China-Wide Entity
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
normal value. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these Under Commerce’s current policy
Decision Memorandum
preliminary results. regarding the conditional review of the
I. Summary
II. Background Scope of the Order hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision
III. Period of Review The merchandise subject to the order Memorandum).
IV. Scope of the Order is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. 2 See the February 9, 2018, no-shipment letter
V. Rescission of the 2015–2016 from Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,
The diamond sawblades subject to the Ltd., and the February 12, 2018, no-shipment letters
Administrative Review, in Part order are currently classifiable under from Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.,
VI. Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu
in Part Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai
VII. Rate for Non-Examined Companies United States (HTSUS), and may also Starcraft Tools Company Limited, and Wuhan
VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
enter under 6804.21.00. While the 3 See the CBP message numbers 8129311–
IX. Analysis of Programs HTSUS subheadings are provided for 8129313 dated May 9, 2018, and 8130301–8130303
X. Recommendation
convenience and customs purposes, the dated May 10, 2018, available at http://
[FR Doc. 2018–17156 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] written description is dispositive. A full adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/.
4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P description of the scope of the order is for a detailed discussion.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
contained in the Preliminary Decision 5 See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
Memorandum.1 People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final
Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and
1 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013, 80 FR
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 34619 (June 17, 2015).
6 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4–8,
China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
12 See 19 CFR 351.310. Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative for more details.
13 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with and 7 Id. at 8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39826/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-10 01:57:30
Document Modified: 2018-08-10 01:57:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable August 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | Myrna Lobo or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 and (202) 482-1396, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39671 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR