83 FR 39677 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 39677-39679 | |
| FR Document | 2018-17177 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 39677-39679] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-17177] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-825] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the [[Page 39678]] countervailing duty (CVD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. We preliminarily determine that Jindal Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal) and SRF Limited/SRF Limited of India (SRF) received countervailable subsidies during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi Blum and Kathryn Wallace, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0197 and (202) 482-6251, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 3, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on PET film from India, for the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017.\1\ In accordance with sections 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2) and (3), in July 2017, we received five review requests. DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners) requested reviews of Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Polyplex Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex), SRF, Jindal, and Vacmet India Limited (Vacmet). Additionally, Polyplex USA LLC requested reviews for Ester, Garware, Jindal, MTZ Polyesters Ltd. (MTZ), Polyplex, SRF Limited, Uflex Ltd. (Uflex), and Vacmet. Finally, Chiripal Poly Films Limited (Chiripal), SRF, and Jindal each self-requested to be reviewed in the instant review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 30833 (July 3, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsequently, on September 13, 2017, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.222(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on PET Film from India.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On October 3, 2017, we placed on the record U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) import data for purposes of respondent selection, and invited parties to comment.\3\ On October 10, 2017, SRF and Jindal each submitted comments requesting selection for individual examination.\4\ Subsequently, SRF,\5\ Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) \6\ each timely withdrew their requests for review. Polyplex USA timely withdrew its requests for a review on December 12, 2016, for all companies.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum ``Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Release of U.S. Customs Entry Data for Respondent Selection'' dated October 3, 2017. \4\ See SRF's CBP Comments; see also Jindal's Letter, ``PET Film from India: Comments on CBP Data'' dated October 10, 2017. \5\ See SRF's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for Countervailing Duty Admin Review of SRF Limited (SRF)'' dated December 11, 2017. \6\ See Jindal's Letter, ``Withdraw Requests for Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order'' dated December 10, 2017. \7\ Polyplex USA's Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Request of Partial Withdrawal of Administrative Review,'' dated December 12, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 23, 2018, Commerce issued a memorandum tolling all deadlines for this investigation by three days due to the shutdown of the federal government.\8\ On March 23, 2018,\9\ and June 1, 2018, we extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review to August 3, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum,'' Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government'' dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days. \9\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review--2016'' dated March 23, 2018; see also Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review'' dated June 1, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET film are classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Commerce initiated a review of ten companies in this segment of the proceeding.\10\ In response to timely filed withdrawal requests, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to Uflex and MTZ, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Accordingly, the companies subject to the instant review are: Ester Industries Ltd.; Garware Polyester Ltd.; Jindal; Polyplex Corporation Ltd.; SRF; and Vacmet India Limited, of which Commerce has selected Jindal and SRF as the mandatory respondents.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 42974, 42974 (September 13, 2017). The ten companies were Chiripal, Ester, Garware, Jindal, MTZ, Polyplex, SRF (as SRF Limited and SRF Limited of India), Uflex, and Vacmet). \11\ See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination'' dated November 27, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\12\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Companies Not Selected for Individual Review For the companies not selected for individual review, because the rates calculated for Jindal and SRF were above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we applied, [[Page 39679]] consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, a subsidy rate based on a simple average of the subsidy rates calculated for Jindal and SRF because publicly ranged sales data was not submitted by respondents. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine the total estimated net countervailable subsidy rates for the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016 to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Manufacturer/exporter (percent ad valorem) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jindal Poly Films Limited of India...................... 10.71 SRF Limited............................................. 7.47 Ester Industries Limited................................ 9.09 Garware Polyester Ltd................................... 9.09 Polyplex Corporation Ltd................................ 9.09 Vacmet India Limited.................................... 9.09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\13\ Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) within 30 days of publication of the preliminary results and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\14\ Rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs.\15\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(l)(ii) and 351.309(d)(l). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must do so within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results by submitting a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system.\17\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\18\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. Issues addressed at the hearing will be limited to those raised in the briefs.\19\ All briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically and received successfully in their entirety through ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.310. \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their comments, within 120 days after publication of these preliminary results. Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Requirement Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties, in the amounts shown above for each of the respective companies shown above, on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits at the most-recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 3, 2018. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review 4. Scope of the Order 5. Subsidies Valuation Information 6. Analysis of Programs 7. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-17177 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39677
hearing must submit a written request to produced by Bonuts, PT, or Unicatch, investigation.20 These cash deposit
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement for which the producer did not know requirements, when imposed, shall
and Compliance, filed electronically via that its merchandise was destined for remain in effect until further notice.
ACCESS, within 30 days after the date the United States, we will instruct CBP Notifications
of publication of this notice.14 Requests to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
should contain: (1) The party’s name, all-others rate if there is no rate for the This notice also serves as a
address, and telephone number; (2) the intermediate company(ies) involved in preliminary reminder to importers of
number of participants; and (3) a list of the transaction.19 their responsibility under 19 CFR
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
For the firms covered by this review, regarding the reimbursement of
the hearing will be limited to those
we intend to issue liquidation antidumping duties prior to liquidation
raised in the respective case and
instructions to CBP 15 days after of the relevant entries during this
rebuttal briefs.
Unless otherwise extended, publication of the final results of this review period. Failure to comply with
Commerce intends to issue the final review. For the non-reviewed firms for this requirement could result in the
results of this administrative review, which we are rescinding this Secretary’s presumption that
including the results of its analysis of administrative review, Commerce reimbursement of antidumping duties
the issues raised in any written briefs, intends to instruct CBP 15 days after occurred and the subsequent assessment
not later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of double antidumping duties.
publication of this notice, pursuant to of review to assess antidumping duties We are issuing and publishing these
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. at rates equal to the rates of cash results in accordance with sections
deposits for estimated antidumping 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Assessment Rates duties required at the time of entry, or Dated: August 3, 2018.
Upon completion of the withdrawn from warehouse, for
Christian Marsh,
administrative review, Commerce shall consumption, during the period May 20,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
determine, and CBP shall assess, 2016, through June 30, 2017, in
and Compliance.
antidumping duties on all appropriate accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2).
entries in accordance with 19 CFR Appendix
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue Cash Deposit Requirements
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
instructions to CBP 15 days after the The following cash deposit Decision Memorandum
date of publication of the final results of requirements will be effective for all 1. Summary
this review. shipments of the subject merchandise 2. Background
Where the respondent reported entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 3. Scope of the Order
reliable entered values, we calculated for consumption on or after the 4. Partial Rescission of Administrative
importer- (or customer-) specific ad Review
publication date of the final results of
valorem rates by aggregating the 5. Duty Absorption
this administrative review, as provided
dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 6. Use of Facts Available With an Adverse
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Inference
sales to each importer (or customer) and
The cash deposit rate for Bonuts, PT, 7. Comparisons to Normal Value
dividing this amount by the total
and Unicatch will be equal to the 8. Date of Sale
entered value of the sales to each
importer (or customer).15 Where weighted-average dumping margin 9. Export Price and Constructed Export
established in the final results of this Price
Commerce calculated a weighted- 10. Normal Value
average dumping margin by dividing the review, except if the rate is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 11. Currency Conversion
total amount of dumping for reviewed 12. Verification
sales to that party by the total sales 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 13. Recommendation
quantity associated with those deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other
[FR Doc. 2018–17163 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
transactions, Commerce will direct CBP manufacturers and exporters covered in
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
to assess importer- (or customer-) a prior segment of the proceeding, the
specific assessment rates based on the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
resulting per-unit rates.16 Where an company-specific rate published for the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
importer- (or customer-) specific ad most recently completed segment of this
valorem or per-unit rate is greater than proceeding in which that manufacturer International Trade Administration
de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), or exporter participated; (3) if the
[C–533–825]
Commerce will instruct CBP to collect exporter is not a firm covered in this
the appropriate duties at the time of review, a prior review, or the original Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
liquidation.17 Where an importer- (or less-than-fair-value (LTFV) Sheet, and Strip From India:
customer-) specific ad valorem or per- investigation, but the manufacturer is, Preliminary Results and Partial
unit rate is zero or de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be the Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate rate established for the most recently Administrative Review; 2016
appropriate entries without regard to completed segment of this proceeding
antidumping duties.18 for the manufacturer of subject AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Consistent with Commerce’s merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit International Trade Administration,
assessment practice, for entries of rate for all other manufacturers or U.S. Department of Commerce.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
subject merchandise during the POR exporters will continue to be 2.24 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
percent, the all-others rate in the LTFV (Commerce) is conducting an
14 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). administrative review of the
15 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 19 For a full discussion of this practice, see
16 Id.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 20 See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final
17 Id.
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80
18 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). (May 6, 2003). FR 28959 (May 20, 2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39832/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39679
consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A) of telephone the date, time, and location of 7. Recommendation
the Act, a subsidy rate based on a the hearing. Issues addressed at the [FR Doc. 2018–17177 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
simple average of the subsidy rates hearing will be limited to those raised BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
calculated for Jindal and SRF because in the briefs.19 All briefs and hearing
publicly ranged sales data was not requests must be filed electronically and
submitted by respondents. received successfully in their entirety DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
through ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Preliminary Results of Review International Trade Administration
Time on the due date.
We preliminarily determine the total
Unless the deadline is extended [A–583–856]
estimated net countervailable subsidy
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
rates for the period January 1, 2016, Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Act, Commerce intends to issue the final
through December 31, 2016 to be: Products From Taiwan: Preliminary
results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of Results of Antidumping Duty
Subsidy rate Administrative Review and Partial
Manufacturer/exporter (percent ad the issues raised by the parties in their
valorem) comments, within 120 days after Rescission of Antidumping Duty
publication of these preliminary results. Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Jindal Poly Films Limited of
India .................................. 10.71 Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
SRF Limited .......................... 7.47 Requirement International Trade Administration,
Ester Industries Limited ........ 9.09 Department of Commerce.
Garware Polyester Ltd .......... 9.09 Upon issuance of the final results, SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Polyplex Corporation Ltd ...... 9.09 Commerce shall determine, and U.S. (Commerce) preliminarily determines
Vacmet India Limited ............ 9.09 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that producers/exporters subject to this
shall assess, countervailing duties on all review made sales of subject
Disclosure and Public Comment appropriate entries covered by this merchandise at less than normal value.
Commerce will disclose to parties to review. We intend to issue instructions We invite interested parties to comment
this proceeding the calculations to CBP 15 days after publication of the on these preliminary results.
performed in reaching the preliminary final results of review. DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
results within five days of the date of Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
publication of these preliminary Act, Commerce also intends to instruct Stolz, Shanah Lee, or Emily Halle, AD/
results.13 Interested parties may submit CBP to collect cash deposits of CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
written comments (case briefs) within estimated countervailing duties, in the and Compliance, International Trade
30 days of publication of the amounts shown above for each of the Administration, U.S. Department of
preliminary results and rebuttal respective companies shown above, on Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
comments (rebuttal briefs) within five shipments of subject merchandise NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
days after the time limit for filing case entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, (202) 482–4474, (202) 482–6386, and
briefs.14 Rebuttal briefs must be limited for consumption on or after the date of (202) 482–0176, respectively.
to issues raised in the case briefs.15 publication of the final results of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Parties who submit case or rebuttal review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
briefs are requested to submit with the will instruct CBP to continue to collect Background
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; cash deposits at the most-recent Commerce is conducting an
(2) a brief summary of the argument; company-specific or all-others rate administrative review of the
and (3) a table of authorities.16 applicable to the company, as antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
Interested parties who wish to request appropriate. These cash deposit corrosion-resistant steel products
a hearing must do so within 30 days of requirements, when imposed, shall (CORE) from Taiwan.1 The period of
publication of these preliminary results remain in effect until further notice. review (POR) is June 2, 2016, through
by submitting a written request to the June 30, 2017. We initially selected two
These preliminary results of review
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and companies, Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd.
are issued and published in accordance
Compliance, U.S. Department of (SYSCO), and the previously collapsed
with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of
Commerce, using Enforcement and Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd.
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and
Compliance’s ACCESS system.17 (Prosperity), Yieh Phui Enterprise Co.,
351.221(b)(4).
Requests should contain the party’s Ltd. (YP), and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd.
name, address, and telephone number, Dated: August 3, 2018.
(Synn) entity (collectively, YP/Synn/
the number of participants, and a list of Christian Marsh, Prosperity entity), for individual
the issues to be discussed. If a request Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement examination.2 For a complete
for a hearing is made, we will inform and Compliance.
parties of the scheduled date for the Appendix 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
hearing which will be held at the U.S. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
Department of Commerce, 1401 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Decision Memorandum 2 In the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation
of the AD order, we collapsed YP with its affiliate
DC 20230, at a time and location to be 1. Summary Synn and treated YP/Synn as a single entity in that
2. Background
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
determined.18 Parties should confirm by proceeding. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
3. Partial Rescission of Administrative Products from Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales
13 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). Review at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
14 See 4. Scope of the Order Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81
19 CFR 351.309(c)(l)(ii) and 351.309(d)(l).
15 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2). 5. Subsidies Valuation Information FR 35313 (June 2, 2016) and accompanying Issues
6. Analysis of Programs and Decision Memorandum (IDM) (Taiwan CORE
16 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
LTFV Final); unchanged in Certain Corrosion-
17 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the
18 See 19 CFR 351.310. 19 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39832/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-10 01:56:39
Document Modified: 2018-08-10 01:56:39
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable August 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | Elfi Blum and Kathryn Wallace, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0197 and (202) 482-6251, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39677 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR