83 FR 39682 - Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 39682-39683 | |
| FR Document | 2018-17164 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 39682-39683] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-17164] [[Page 39682]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-876] Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending its final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea to correct a ministerial error in the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin of SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH). Correction of the error results in revised margins for SeAH and the companies not selected for individual examination. Finally, in correcting this error, we also discovered an error in the assessment rates calculated for Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel), which did not affect Hyundai Steel's final dumping margin. The amended final dumping margins are listed below in the section entitled, ``Amended Final Results.'' DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 18, 2018, Commerce published the Final Results of the 2015- 2016 administrative review in the Federal Register.\1\ Subsequently, SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH), one of two companies selected for individual examination, alleged that Commerce made a ministerial error related to the application of weighted-average further manufacturing costs to the appropriate U.S. sales.\2\ On July 23, 2018, Maverick Tube Corporation (Maverick) submitted comments in response to SeAH's ministerial error allegation.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 33919 (July 18, 2018) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). \2\ See SeAH's Letter, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea--Comments on Ministerial Error in Final Determination,'' dated July 18, 2018 (SeAH Ministerial Error Allegation). \3\ See Maverick's letter, ``Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Maverick's Reply to SeAH's Ministerial Error Comments,'' dated July 23, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded line pipe.\4\ The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea,'' dated January 2, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ministerial Error Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), defines ``ministerial errors'' as including ``errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.'' \5\ SeAH alleges that we made a ministerial error in our calculation of its margin by incorrectly assigning the control number (CONNUM)-specific weighted-average further manufacturing costs to all of SeAH's U.S. sales of that CONNUM, rather than only those sales of that CONNUM that underwent further processing in the United States.\6\ After analyzing the comments of interested parties, we find that we made a ministerial error in the Final Results, within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), with respect to SeAH's further manufacturing costs for its U.S. sales.\7\ Correction of this error in SeAH's final margin program results in a revised weighted- average dumping margin for the company. Furthermore, we are revising the review-specific average rate applicable to the 22 companies not selected for individual examination in this administrative review. For a detailed discussion and analysis of the ministerial error, see the Ministerial Error Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See also 19 CFR 351.224(f). \6\ See SeAH Ministerial Error Allegation. \7\ See Memorandum, ``Welded Line Pipe from Korea: 2015-2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order--Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, in correcting this error, we also discovered an error in the assessment rates calculated for Hyundai Steel. This error did not affect the final dumping margin calculated for Hyundai Steel.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See ``Calculations for Hyundai Steel Company for the Amended Final Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amended Final Results of the Review As a result of correcting the ministerial error decribed above, we determine that the weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ As discussed in Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 61366 (October 13, 2015), and accompanying IDM at 1, Hyundai HYSCO merged with Hyundai Steel subsequent to the period of investigation and Hyundai HYSCO no longer exists. Accordingly, our examination of Hyundai Steel includes entries made by Hyundai HYSCO prior to the date of the merger. \10\ This is the rate we calculated for Hyundai Steel in the Final Results. \11\ We incorrectly referred to SeAH as ``SeAH Steel Company'' in our Final Results. However, SeAH's correct full name is SeAH Steel Corporation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai HYSCO \9\..................... 18.77 \10\ SeAH Steel Corporation \11\................................. 14.39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: \12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ This rate is based on the simple average margin for those companies selected for individual review. Because we cannot apply our normal methodology of calculating a weighted-average margin due to requests to protect business proprietary information, we find this rate to be the best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010); see also Ministerial Error Memorandum, and Memorandum, ``Calculations for SeAH Steel Corporation for the Amended Final Results,'' dated concurrently with the Ministerial Error Memorandum. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AJU BESTEEL CO., Ltd........................................ 16.58 Daewoo International Corporation............................ 16.58 Dong Yang Steel Pipe........................................ 16.58 Dongbu Incheon Steel Co..................................... 16.58 Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd....................................... 16.58 [[Page 39683]] Dongkuk Steel Mill.......................................... 16.58 EEW Korea Co, Ltd........................................... 16.58 HISTEEL Co., Ltd............................................ 16.58 Husteel Co., Ltd............................................ 16.58 Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd.................................... 16.58 Kolon Global Corp........................................... 16.58 Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co., Ltd.......................... 16.58 Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd..................................... 16.58 MSTEEL Co., Ltd............................................. 16.58 NEXTEEL Co., Ltd............................................ 16.58 Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division)........................ 16.58 POSCO....................................................... 16.58 Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd....................................... 16.58 Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd..................................... 16.58 Soon-Hong Trading Company................................... 16.58 Steel Flower Co., Ltd....................................... 16.58 TGS Pipe.................................................... 16.58 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where Hyundai Steel and SeAH reported the entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer- specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where Hyundai Steel did not report entered value, we calculated the entered value in order to calculate the assessment rate. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the average \13\ of the cash deposit rates calculated for Hyundai Steel and SeAH. The amended final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the amended final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 11, above. \14\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP for Hyundai Steel, SeAH, and the companies subject to the review-specific average rate 15 days after publication of these amended final results of this administrative review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective retroactively for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July 18, 2018, the date of publication date of the Final Results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.38 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\15\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These amended final results and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: August 6, 2018. James Maeder, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2018-17164 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![39682 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE comments in response to SeAH’s detailed discussion and analysis of the
ministerial error allegation.3 ministerial error, see the Ministerial
International Trade Administration Error Memorandum.
Scope of the Order
Finally, in correcting this error, we
[A–580–876] The merchandise subject to the order also discovered an error in the
is welded line pipe.4 The product is assessment rates calculated for Hyundai
Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of currently classified under the following Steel. This error did not affect the final
Korea: Amended Final Results of Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the dumping margin calculated for Hyundai
Antidumping Duty Administrative United States (HTSUS) item numbers: Steel.8
Review; 2015–2016 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060,
7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, Amended Final Results of the Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, As a result of correcting the
Department of Commerce. 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, ministerial error decribed above, we
7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, determine that the weighted-average
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. dumping margins are as follows:
(Commerce) is amending its final results Although the HTSUS numbers are
of the administrative review of the provided for convenience and for Weighted-
antidumping duty (AD) order on welded customs purposes, the written product average
line pipe from the Republic of Korea to description remains dispositive. Exporter/producer dumping
correct a ministerial error in the margin
Ministerial Error (percent)
calculation of the weighted-average
dumping margin of SeAH Steel Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai
Corporation (SeAH). Correction of the 1930, as amended (the Act), defines HYSCO 9 ................................. 18.77 10
error results in revised margins for ‘‘ministerial errors’’ as including ‘‘errors SeAH Steel Corporation 11 ......... 14.39
SeAH and the companies not selected in addition, subtraction, or other
for individual examination. Finally, in arithmetic function, clerical errors Review-Specific Average Rate
correcting this error, we also discovered resulting from inaccurate copying, Applicable to the Following
an error in the assessment rates duplication, or the like, and any other Companies: 12
calculated for Hyundai Steel Company type of unintentional error which the
(Hyundai Steel), which did not affect administering authority considers Weighted-
Hyundai Steel’s final dumping margin. average
ministerial.’’ 5 SeAH alleges that we Exporter/producer dumping
The amended final dumping margins made a ministerial error in our margin
are listed below in the section entitled, calculation of its margin by incorrectly (percent)
‘‘Amended Final Results.’’ assigning the control number
(CONNUM)-specific weighted-average AJU BESTEEL CO., Ltd ............. 16.58
DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
further manufacturing costs to all of Daewoo International Corpora-
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: tion .......................................... 16.58
David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, SeAH’s U.S. sales of that CONNUM,
Dong Yang Steel Pipe ................ 16.58
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, rather than only those sales of that Dongbu Incheon Steel Co .......... 16.58
Enforcement and Compliance, CONNUM that underwent further Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd ................ 16.58
International Trade Administration, processing in the United States.6 After
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 analyzing the comments of interested 8 See ‘‘Calculations for Hyundai Steel Company
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, parties, we find that we made a for the Amended Final Results,’’ dated concurrently
ministerial error in the Final Results, with this notice.
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or
within the meaning of section 751(h) of 9 As discussed in Welded Line Pipe from the
(202) 482–4952, respectively. Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), with
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 61366 (October 13,
respect to SeAH’s further manufacturing 2015), and accompanying IDM at 1, Hyundai
Background costs for its U.S. sales.7 Correction of HYSCO merged with Hyundai Steel subsequent to
this error in SeAH’s final margin the period of investigation and Hyundai HYSCO no
On July 18, 2018, Commerce program results in a revised weighted- longer exists. Accordingly, our examination of
published the Final Results of the 2015– average dumping margin for the
Hyundai Steel includes entries made by Hyundai
2016 administrative review in the HYSCO prior to the date of the merger.
company. Furthermore, we are revising 10 This is the rate we calculated for Hyundai Steel
Federal Register.1 Subsequently, SeAH the review-specific average rate in the Final Results.
Steel Corporation (SeAH), one of two applicable to the 22 companies not 11 We incorrectly referred to SeAH as ‘‘SeAH
companies selected for individual selected for individual examination in Steel Company’’ in our Final Results. However,
examination, alleged that Commerce this administrative review. For a SeAH’s correct full name is SeAH Steel
made a ministerial error related to the Corporation.
12 This rate is based on the simple average margin
application of weighted-average further 3 See Maverick’s letter, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from
for those companies selected for individual review.
manufacturing costs to the appropriate the Republic of Korea: Maverick’s Reply to SeAH’s Because we cannot apply our normal methodology
U.S. sales.2 On July 23, 2018, Maverick Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated July 23, 2018. of calculating a weighted-average margin due to
4 For a complete description of the scope of the
Tube Corporation (Maverick) submitted requests to protect business proprietary
order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum information, we find this rate to be the best proxy
for the Preliminary Results of the 2015–2016 of the actual weighted-average margin determined
1 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty for the mandatory respondents. See Ball Bearings
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea,’’ dated and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: Final Results
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR 33919 January 2, 2018. of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final
(July 18, 2018) (Final Results), and accompanying 5 See also 19 CFR 351.224(f).
Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and
Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). 6 See SeAH Ministerial Error Allegation. Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663
2 See SeAH’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from (September 1, 2010); see also Ministerial Error
the Antidumping Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea: 2015–2016 Administrative Review of the Memorandum, and Memorandum, ‘‘Calculations for
Korea—Comments on Ministerial Error in Final Antidumping Duty Order—Ministerial Error SeAH Steel Corporation for the Amended Final
Determination,’’ dated July 18, 2018 (SeAH Allegation,’’ dated concurrently with this notice Results,’’ dated concurrently with the Ministerial
Ministerial Error Allegation). (Ministerial Error Memorandum). Error Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39837/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39683
Weighted- merchandise covered by the amended Administrative Protective Order
average final results of this review and for future
Exporter/producer dumping This notice serves as the only
deposits of estimated duties, where
margin reminder to parties subject to
applicable.14
(percent)
We intend to issue liquidation administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
Dongkuk Steel Mill ...................... 16.58 instructions to CBP for Hyundai Steel, disposition of proprietary information
EEW Korea Co, Ltd .................... 16.58 SeAH, and the companies subject to the
HISTEEL Co., Ltd ....................... 16.58 review-specific average rate 15 days
disclosed under APO in accordance
Husteel Co., Ltd .......................... 16.58 after publication of these amended final with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd ......... 16.58 results of this administrative review. continues to govern business
Kolon Global Corp ...................... 16.58 proprietary information in this segment
Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co., Cash Deposit Requirements of the proceeding. Timely written
Ltd ........................................... 16.58
The following cash deposit notification of return/destruction of
Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd ............. 16.58 APO materials or conversion to judicial
MSTEEL Co., Ltd .......................
requirements will be effective
16.58
retroactively for all shipments of the protective order is hereby requested.
NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ..................... 16.58
Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Divi- subject merchandise entered, or Failure to comply with the regulations
16.58 withdrawn from warehouse, for
sion) ........................................ and the terms of an APO is a
16.58 consumption on or after July 18, 2018,
POSCO ....................................... sanctionable violation.
Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd ............ 16.58 the date of publication date of the Final These amended final results and
Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd ............. 16.58 Results, as provided by section notice are issued and published in
Soon-Hong Trading Company .... 16.58 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash accordance with sections 751(h) and
Steel Flower Co., Ltd ..................
16.58
deposit rate for each specific company 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
TGS Pipe ....................................
16.58
listed above will be that established in Dated: August 6, 2018.
We intend to disclose the calculations the final results of this review, except if James Maeder,
performed within five days of the date the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
of publication of this notice to parties in therefore, de minimis within the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
this proceeding, in accordance with 19 meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in Operations performing the duties of Deputy
CFR 351.224(b). which case the cash deposit rate will be Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
zero; (2) for previously investigated Countervailing Duty Operations.
Assessment Rates companies not participating in this [FR Doc. 2018–17164 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the review, the cash deposit will continue BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), to be the company-specific rate
Commerce has determined, and U.S. published for the most recently
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) completed segment of this proceeding in DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
shall assess, antidumping duties on all which the company participated; (3) if
appropriate entries of subject the exporter is not a firm covered in this International Trade Administration
merchandise in accordance with the review, or the original less-than-fair-
amended final results of this review. value (LTFV) investigation, but the [A–533–863]
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
where Hyundai Steel and SeAH will be the rate established for the most Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
reported the entered value of their U.S. recent segment for the manufacturer of Products From India: Preliminary
sales, we calculated importer-specific the merchandise; and (4) the cash Results of Antidumping Duty
ad valorem duty assessment rates based deposit rate for all other manufacturers Administrative Review; 2016–2017
on the ratio of the total amount of or exporters will continue to be 4.38
dumping calculated for the examined percent, the all-others rate established AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
sales to the total entered value of the in the LTFV investigation.15 These International Trade Administration,
sales for which entered value was deposit requirements, when imposed, Department of Commerce.
reported. Where Hyundai Steel did not shall remain in effect until further SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
report entered value, we calculated the notice. (Commerce) preliminarily determines
entered value in order to calculate the Notification to Importers that certain corrosion-resistant steel
assessment rate. Where either the products (CORE) from India are being,
respondent’s weighted-average dumping This notice serves as a final reminder or are likely to be sold, at less than
margin is zero or de minimis within the to importers of their responsibility normal value during the period of
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a review (POR), January 4, 2016, through
importer-specific rate is zero or de certificate regarding the reimbursement June 30, 2017. We invite interested
minimis, we will instruct CBP to of antidumping duties prior to parties to comment on these preliminary
liquidation of the relevant entries results.
liquidate the appropriate entries
during this review period. Failure to
without regard to antidumping duties. DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
For the companies which were not comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
selected for individual review, we will
that reimbursement of antidumping Rachel Greenberg or Kabir Archuletta,
assign an assessment rate based on the
duties occurred and the subsequent AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
average 13 of the cash deposit rates
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Enforcement and Compliance,
calculated for Hyundai Steel and SeAH. assessment of double antidumping
International Trade Administration,
The amended final results of this review duties.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
shall be the basis for the assessment of 14 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
antidumping duties on entries of 15 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0652 or
Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping (202) 482–2593, respectively.
13 This rate was calculated as discussed in Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1,
footnote 11, above. 2015). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39837/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-10 01:56:38
Document Modified: 2018-08-10 01:56:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable August 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39682 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR