83 FR 39688 - Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 155 (August 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 39688-39691 | |
| FR Document | 2018-17162 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 39688-39691] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-17162] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with June anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with June anniversary dates. All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, or comments or actions by Commerce discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time. Notice of No Sales If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (POR), it must notify Commerce within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically at http://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.\1\ Such submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served on every party on Commerce's service list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondent Selection In the event Commerce limits the number of respondents for individual [[Page 39689]] examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, Commerce intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to place the CBP data on the record within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 30 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection should be submitted seven days after the placement of the CBP data on the record of this review. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments should submit those comments five days after the deadline for the initial comments. In the event Commerce decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, Commerce has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (e.g., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (e.g., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if Commerce determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, Commerce will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value (Q&V) Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where Commerce considered collapsing that entity, complete Q&V data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that Commerce may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. Determinations by Commerce to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. Separate Rates In proceedings involving non-market economy (NME) countries, Commerce begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is Commerce's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate. To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from government control of its export activities to be entitled to a separate rate, Commerce analyzes each entity exporting the subject merchandise. In accordance with the separate rates criteria, Commerce assigns separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can demonstrate the absence of both de jure and de facto government control over export activities. All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below. For these administrative reviews, in order to demonstrate separate rate eligibility, Commerce requires entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be available on Commerce's website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the ``Instructions for Filing the Certification'' in the Separate Rate Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to Commerce no later than 30 calendar days after publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a completed segment of the proceeding \2\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or changes to their official company name,\3\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Status Application will be available on Commerce's website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Status Application, refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate Status Applications are due to Commerce no later than 30 calendar days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Status Application applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Such entities include entities that have not participated in the proceeding, entities that were preliminarily granted a separate rate in any currently incomplete segment of the proceeding (e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their separate rate in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which they participated. \3\ Only changes to the official company name, rather than trade names, need to be addressed via a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate Rate Certification. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents. [[Page 39690]] Initiation of Reviews In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than June 30, 2019. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period to be reviewed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings BELGIUM: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length 11/14/16-4/30/18 Plate,\4\ A-423-812........................... Hengelhoef Concrete Joints NV GERMANY: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length 11/14/16-4/30/18 Plate,\5\ A-428-844........................... Ilsenburger Grobblech GmbH Rudolf Rafflenbeul Stahlwarenfabrik GmbH & Co. Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH VDM Metals GmbH \6\ VDM Metals International GmbH \7\ REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut- 11/14/16-4/30/18 To-Length Plate,\8\ A-580-887................. Hyundai Steel Company SPAIN: Finished Carbon Steel Flanges, A-469-815 2/8/17-5/31/18 Ateaciones De Metales Sinterizados S.A. Central Y Almacenes Grupo Cunado Transglory S.A. Tubacero, S.L. ULMA Forja, S.Coop SPAIN: Chlorinated Isocyanurates, A-469-814.... 6/1/17-5/31/18 Ercros, S.A. of Spain THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Aluminum 5/1/17-4/30/18 Extrusions,\9\ A-570-967...................... Asia Alum Group Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Chlorinated 6/1/17-5/31/18 Isocyanurates, A-570-898...................... Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co. Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Polyester 6/1/17-5/31/18 Staple Fiber, A-570-905....................... Yangzhou Tinfulong New Technology Fiber Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Silicon Metal, 6/1/17-5/31/18 A-570-806..................................... Yunnan Fu yang Trade Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Tapered Roller 6/1/17-5/31/18 Bearings, A-570-601........................... Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. CNH Industrial Italia SpA GGB Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. GSP Automotive Group Wenzhou Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Hanji Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Radical Energy-Saving Technology Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Xiaoshan Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. Ningbo Xinglun Bearings Import & Export Co., Ltd. Shandong Aokai Bearing Co., Ltd. Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. Taizhou Zson Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Jingle Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Machinery Import & Export Corp. Zhejiang Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd. Countervailing Duty Proceedings REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut- 4/4/17-12/31/17 To-Length Plate,\10\ C-580-888................ THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: High Pressure 1/1/17-12/31/17 Steel Cylinders, C-570-978.................... Beijing Tianhai Industry Co., Ltd. Langfang Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd. Tianjin Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension Agreements --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The name of the company listed above was misspelled in the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The correct spelling of the company name is listed in this notice. \5\ The companies listed above were misspelled in the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The correct spelling of these companies names are listed in this notice. \6\ The company listed above was inadvertently omitted from the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). \7\ The company listed above was inadvertently omitted from the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). \8\ The name of the company listed above was misspelled in the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The correct spelling of the company name is listed in this notice. \9\ Commerce inadvertently listed two companies as one in the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The companies listed above are individual companies. \10\ In the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270), the period of review for the referenced case was incorrect. The period listed above is the correct period of review for this case. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None. Duty Absorption Reviews During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 [[Page 39691]] days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested. Gap Period Liquidation For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with the procedures outlined in Commerce's regulations at 19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Factual Information Requirements Commerce's regulations identify five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). These regulations require any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also provide specific time limits for such factual submissions based on the type of factual information being submitted. Please review the final rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\11\ Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials as well as their representatives. All segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.\12\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See section 782(b) of the Act. \12\ See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extension of Time Limits Regulation Parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. See 19 CFR 351.302. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, Commerce will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: August 6, 2018. James Maeder, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2018-17162 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![39688 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
telephone number; (2) the number of review (except, if the rate is zero or de DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be minimis, no cash deposit will be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing required); (2) for previously reviewed or International Trade Administration
will be limited to those raised in the investigated companies not listed above,
respective case briefs. Commerce the cash deposit rate will continue to be Initiation of Antidumping and
intends to issue the final results of this the company-specific rate published for Countervailing Duty Administrative
administrative review, including the the most recent period; (3) if the Reviews
results of its analysis of the issues raised exporter is not a firm covered in this AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
in any written briefs, not later than 120 review, a prior review, or the less-than- International Trade Administration,
days after the date of publication of this fair-value investigation, but the Department of Commerce.
notice, unless extended, pursuant to manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. will be the rate established for the most (Commerce) has received requests to
Assessment Rates recent period for the manufacturer of conduct administrative reviews of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash various antidumping and countervailing
Upon completion of this deposit rate for all other manufacturers duty orders and findings with June
administrative review, Commerce shall or exporters is 2.40 percent.5 These cash anniversary dates. In accordance with
determine and U.S. Customs and Border deposit requirements, when imposed, Commerce’s regulations, we are
Protection (CBP) shall assess shall remain in effect until further initiating those administrative reviews.
antidumping duties on all appropriate notice.
entries. If a respondent’s weighted- DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
average dumping margin is not zero or Notification to Interested Parties FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD
This notice also serves as a Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
in the final results of this review, we
preliminary reminder to importers of Enforcement and Compliance,
will calculate importer-specific ad
their responsibility under 19 CFR International Trade Administration,
valorem assessment rates on the basis of
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
regarding the reimbursement of Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
calculated for an importer’s examined
antidumping duties prior to liquidation DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735.
sales and the total entered value of such
of the relevant entries during this
sales in accordance with 19 CFR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
351.212(b)(1). Where either the review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the Background
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis within the Secretary’s presumption that Commerce has received timely
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an reimbursement of antidumping duties requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
importer-specific rate is zero or de occurred and the subsequent assessment 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of
minimis, we will instruct CBP to of double antidumping duties. various antidumping and countervailing
liquidate the appropriate entries We are issuing and publishing these duty orders and findings with June
without regard to antidumping duties. preliminary results in accordance with anniversary dates.
Commerce clarified its ‘‘automatic sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the All deadlines for the submission of
assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.4 Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). various types of information,
This clarification applies to entries of Dated: August 3, 2018. certifications, or comments or actions by
subject merchandise during the POR Commerce discussed below refer to the
Christian Marsh,
produced by a respondent for which it number of calendar days from the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
did not know its merchandise was applicable starting time.
and Compliance.
destined for the United States. In such Notice of No Sales
instances, we will instruct CBP to Appendix
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- If a producer or exporter named in
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
others rate if there is no rate for the this notice of initiation had no exports,
Decision Memorandum
intermediate company(ies) involved in sales, or entries during the period of
I. Summary review (POR), it must notify Commerce
the transaction. II. Background
We intend to issue instructions to within 30 days of publication of this
III. Scope of the Order
CBP 15 days after publication of the IV. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments for notice in the Federal Register. All
final results of this review. SMTC submissions must be filed electronically
V. Product Comparisons at http://access.trade.gov in accordance
Cash Deposit Requirements VI. Comparison to Normal Value with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such
The following deposit requirements A. Determination of Comparison Method submissions are subject to verification
will be effective for all shipments of B. Results of the Differential Pricing in accordance with section 782(i) of the
PET Film from Taiwan entered, or Analysis Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
withdrawn from warehouse, for C. Date of Sale Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
consumption on or after the date of D. Export Price
351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served
E. Normal Value
publication of the final results of this on every party on Commerce’s service
F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
administrative review, as provided for Comparison Market Prices list.
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) G. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparisons Respondent Selection
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The cash deposit rate for the company H. Currency Conversion
under review will be the rate VII. Recommendation In the event Commerce limits the
established in the final results of this [FR Doc. 2018–17179 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] number of respondents for individual
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
4 For a full discussion of this clarification, see 1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 5 See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). Determination. 39263 (July 6, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39843/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39691
days of the date of publication of the factual information being submitted. parties in the letter or memorandum
notice of initiation of the review, will Please review the final rule, available at setting forth the deadline (including a
determine whether antidumping duties http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ specified time) by which extension
have been absorbed by an exporter or 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to requests must be filed to be considered
producer subject to the review if the submitting factual information in this timely. This modification also requires
subject merchandise is sold in the segment. that an extension request must be made
United States through an importer that Any party submitting factual in a separate, stand-alone submission,
is affiliated with such exporter or information in an antidumping duty or and clarifies the circumstances under
producer. The request must include the countervailing duty proceeding must which Commerce will grant untimely-
name(s) of the exporter or producer for certify to the accuracy and completeness filed requests for the extension of time
which the inquiry is requested. of that information.11 Parties are hereby limits. These modifications are effective
reminded that revised certification for all segments initiated on or after
Gap Period Liquidation requirements are in effect for company/ October 21, 2013. Please review the
For the first administrative review of government officials as well as their final rule, available at http://
any order, there will be no assessment representatives. All segments of any www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/
of antidumping or countervailing duties antidumping duty or countervailing html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
on entries of subject merchandise duty proceedings initiated on or after submitting factual information in these
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, August 16, 2013, should use the formats segments.
for consumption during the relevant for the revised certifications provided at These initiations and this notice are,
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of the end of the Final Rule.12 Commerce in accordance with section 751(a) of the
the order, if such a gap period is intends to reject factual submissions in Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
applicable to the POR. any proceeding segments if the 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Administrative Protective Orders and submitting party does not comply with Dated: August 6, 2018.
Letters of Appearance applicable revised certification James Maeder,
requirements. Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under Extension of Time Limits Regulation Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
administrative protective orders in Parties may request an extension of Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
accordance with the procedures time limits before a time limit Countervailing Duty Operations.
outlined in Commerce’s regulations at established under Part 351 expires, or as [FR Doc. 2018–17162 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures otherwise specified by the Secretary. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
apply to administrative reviews See 19 CFR 351.302. In general, an
included in this notice of initiation. extension request will be considered
Parties wishing to participate in any of untimely if it is filed after the time limit DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
these administrative reviews should established under Part 351 expires. For
ensure that they meet the requirements submissions which are due from International Trade Administration
of these procedures (e.g., the filing of multiple parties simultaneously, an [A–469–817]
separate letters of appearance as extension request will be considered
discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on Ripe Olives From Spain: Notice of
Factual Information Requirements the due date. Examples include, but are Correction to Antidumping Duty Order
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal
Commerce’s regulations identify five briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
categories of factual information in 19 (2) factual information to value factors International Trade Administration,
CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure Department of Commerce.
summarized as follows: (i) Evidence the adequacy of remuneration under 19 DATES: Applicable August 1, 2018.
submitted in response to questionnaires; CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(ii) evidence submitted in support of CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, Bryan Hansen or Peter Zukowski, AD/
allegations; (iii) publicly available clarification and correction filed CVD Operations Office I, Enforcement
information to value factors under 19 pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) and Compliance, International Trade
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the comments concerning the selection of a Administration, U.S. Department of
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR surrogate country and surrogate values Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
the record by Commerce; and (v) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–0189,
evidence other than factual information data; and (5) quantity and value respectively.
described in (i)–(iv). These regulations questionnaires. Under certain
require any party, when submitting SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
circumstances, Commerce may elect to
factual information, to specify under specify a different time limit by which Background
which subsection of 19 CFR extension requests will be considered On August 1, 2018, the Department of
351.102(b)(21) the information is being untimely for submissions which are due Commerce (Commerce) published the
submitted and, if the information is from multiple parties simultaneously. In Antidumping Duty Order on ripe olives
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct such a case, Commerce will inform from Spain.1 In the Antidumping Duty
factual information already on the
Order, Commerce made typographical
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
record, to provide an explanation 11 See section 782(b) of the Act. errors with respect to the estimated
identifying the information already on 12 See Certification of Factual Information To weighted-average dumping margin and
the record that the factual information Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July cash deposit rate for Aceitunas
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked
regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty
provide specific time limits for such http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018) (Antidumping
factual submissions based on the type of info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. Duty Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Aug 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_39843/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-10 01:57:45
Document Modified: 2018-08-10 01:57:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable August 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 39688 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR