83 FR 4115 - Shawnee Fossil Plant New Coal Combustion Residual Landfill
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 19 (January 29, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 19 (January 29, 2018)
| Page Range | 4115-4117 | |
| FR Document | 2018-01621 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 4115-4117] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-01621] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Shawnee Fossil Plant New Coal Combustion Residual Landfill AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority. ACTION: Issuance of Record of Decision. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice is provided in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations and Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). TVA has decided to construct and operate an onsite landfill at the Shawnee Fossil Plant (SHF). A notice of availability (NOA) of the Final EIS for Shawnee Fossil Plant Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) Management was published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2017. The Final EIS identified TVA's preferred alternative as Alternative B-- Construction of an Onsite CCR Landfill, Closure-in-Place of Ash Impoundment 2 with a reduced footprint, and Closure-in-Place of the former Special Waste Landfill. TVA's current decision pertains only to the construction of a new onsite CCR landfill, and would achieve part of the project purpose and need by providing additional long-term disposal for dry CCR materials produced at SHF. TVA is electing to further consider the alternatives for closure of Ash Impoundment 2 and the former Special Waste Landfill (SWL) before making a decision. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Pilakowski, Project Environmental Planning, NEPA Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN 37902; telephone 865-632-2256, or by email [email protected]. The Final EIS, this Record of Decision and other project documents are available on TVA's website https://www.tva.gov/nepa. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, SHF consumes an average of 2.7 million cubic yards of coal per year and generates approximately 8 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity a year (enough to supply 540,000 homes). Until December 2017, SHF produced approximately 183,000 cubic yards of coal combustion residuals (CCR) a year. In December 2017, newly installed selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems became operational on SHF Units 1 and 4, increasing the amount of CCR to an estimated 490,000 cubic yards per year. All CCR currently are managed in the existing onsite landfill and Ash Impoundment 2. The CCR generated by the plant include fly ash, bottom ash and dry scrubber product. The existing onsite landfill, formerly the Special Waste Landfill (SWL), had a state landfill permit. However, it is now considered a CCR Landfill under a Registered Permit-by-Rule with the Kentucky Division of Waste Management effective September 21, 2017. The estimated remaining capacity for the former SWL is approximately 5.2 million cubic yards. Due to current and projected SHF operations, it is expected the former SWL will reach capacity by 2027. To accommodate the need for additional dry CCR storage at SHF, TVA is proposing to design, build, and operate a new CCR Landfill that would accommodate up to 20 additional years of storage capacity. SHF is expected to produce approximately 490,000 to 910,000 cubic yards of CCR per year until 2040. The low-end of this range is based on the current plant configuration, including the use of SCR and FGD systems on SHF Units 1 and 4. The higher-end of this range provides the maximum CCR output that could be anticipated should TVA elect to explore the option of installing similar emission controls on the other SHF units in the future. At present, TVA has no plans to install such systems. Approximately 10 to 20 million cubic yards of disposal capacity is desired for the 20-year SHF comprehensive disposal plan. The purpose of this action is to support the need for additional capacity for the long-term management of CCR at SHF. Additional storage capacity would also enable TVA to continue operations at SHF as planned and would be consistent with TVA's voluntary commitment to convert wet CCR management systems to dry systems. Alternatives Considered In 2015, TVA performed a siting study to evaluate onsite and offsite alternatives for the construction of a landfill for storage of dry CCR from SHF. The siting study identified six alternative sites (Options 1 through 6), within 5 to 10 miles of the plant, for the construction and operation of a new CCR Landfill. The siting study also considered the offsite transport of CCR to one of three existing permitted third-party landfills as a potential alternative. The impacts of development and/or use of each of the landfill alternatives were further evaluated against environmental and engineering factors to determine those sites that should be carried forward for further analysis in the study. Ultimately, one site for construction and operation of a new CCR Landfill (Option 1) and one existing permitted third-party landfill (Freedom Waste Landfill) [[Page 4116]] were identified as potential alternatives to be carried forward for further evaluation. TVA used results of the preliminary alternatives analysis to identify two feasible action alternatives for onsite disposal of CCR at SHF, in addition to a No-Action alternative (Alternative A), which served as a baseline. Alternative A--No Action. Under the No Action Alternative, TVA would not construct and operate the proposed CCR Landfill at or near SHF, or haul CCR to an existing offsite permitted landfill. Since there is limited capacity for additional CCR disposal onsite, at some point in the future, capacity to store CCR onsite will become a limiting factor for continued SHF operations. TVA's 2015 Integrated Resource Plan (TVA 2015c) identifies SHF as a facility that will continue to operate in the near term as part of its balanced portfolio of energy resources. However, SHF cannot continue to operate if it is not compliant with the CCR Rule. Under the No Action Alternative, SHF's operations would not comply with the CCR Rule; therefore, this alternative would not meet the Purpose and Need for the proposed action and is not considered viable or reasonable. It does, however, provide a benchmark for comparing the environmental impacts of implementation of Action Alternatives B and C. Alternative B--Construction and Operation of an Onsite Landfill. Under Alternative B, TVA would build and operate a new CCR Landfill on a portion of the original Option 1 site known as the Shawnee East Site. The Shawnee East Site consists of about 205 acres that TVA acquired in 2016 next to the eastern boundary of SHF. This site would also be used for borrow material for both construction of the new CCR Landfill and potentially for the closures of Ash Impoundment 2 and the former SWL. Alternative C--CCR Disposal at Permitted Offsite Landfill. Under Alternative C, dry CCR produced by daily operations at SHF would be transported by truck to the Freedom Waste Landfill in Mayfield, Kentucky (approximately 32 miles from SHF) along public roadways. No landfill would be constructed on the Shawnee East Site, but borrow materials from that site potentially would be used in the closures of Ash Impoundment 2 and the former SWL. Barge and rail transport were not considered feasible options for this EIS given the lack of existing infrastructure. Environmentally Preferable Alternative TVA has concluded that Alternative A, the No Action Alternative, is the environmentally preferable alternative as it would result in fewer environmental impacts than Alternatives B and C. Under Alternative A, no additional land area would be required for CCR disposal. Eventually, the former SWL would reach capacity which could force reduced operations at SHF potentially eliminating the long-term impacts associated with air emissions. However, Alternative A (No Action) does not meet the purpose and need for the project. Because SHF provides base-load power for a large portion of TVA's service territory, stopping operations at SHF is not consistent with TVA's mission or its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan. Continuing current operations would not comply with the CCR Rule therefore the No Action Alternative is not consistent with this proposed project's purpose and need. Implementation of Alternative B would result in minimal unmitigated impacts to the environment, most of which would be related to construction activities that would be temporary in nature and minimized with implementation of best management practices. Potential impacts associated with the discharge of storm water from the new landfill would be mitigated as needed to ensure compliance with the Clean Water Act. There would be moderate impacts to visual resources associated with changes in the viewshed around the new landfill. Additionally, there would be minor to moderate noise impacts in the vicinity of the new landfill as a result of construction and operational noise. The visual resources and noise impacts would be partially mitigated by the construction and maintenance of a vegetative barrier around the boundaries of the new landfill. Tree removal would result in a loss of potentially suitable foraging and roosting habitat for endangered bat species. Any tree removal would be scheduled so that all tree clearing would be conducted between October 15 and March 31, outside the breeding season. Impacts to wetlands would be mitigated through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act Section 404 permit. The proposed CCR Landfill would have no significant impact on floodplains, which would be consistent with E.O. 11988. TVA consulted with the Tennessee State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) on the proposed actions. In fall 2017, the SHPO concurred with TVA's recommendation that there would be no adverse effect to archaeological resources and no adverse effect to historic properties as a result of the proposed CCR landfill. Under Alternative C, impacts to air quality, transportation, solid waste and hazardous waste and hazardous materials, and public health and safety would be higher than under Alternative B because of the transportation of CCR materials from SHF to an offsite landfill. The use of an existing, permitted landfill would result in no other additional impacts to the natural environment beyond those described for Alternative B. Public Involvement On November 1, 2016, TVA published a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register announcing the plan to prepare an EIS to address the potential environmental effects associated with ceasing operations at the former SWL and Ash Impoundment 2 and constructing, operating, and maintaining a new CCR Landfill at SHF. The 30-day public scoping period concluded on December 1, 2016. TVA also sent the NOI to local and state government entities and federal agencies; published notices regarding this effort in local newspapers; issued a press release to media; posted the news release on the TVA website; and notified residents within a three-mile radius of the plant. TVA hosted an open house scoping meeting on November 15, 2016, at the Robert Cherry Civic Center in Paducah, Kentucky. Comments were received in relation to the project purpose and need, alternatives, impact analysis, cumulative impacts, groundwater and surface water, aquatic ecology and threatened and endangered species, general environmental concerns, transportation, the NEPA Process and Scoping Meeting, and other general topics. The Draft EIS was released to the public on June 9, 2017, and a notice of availability including a request for comments on the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2017. In association with the publication of the Draft EIS, TVA hosted a public meeting on June 22, 2017, at the Robert Cherry Civic Center in Paducah, Kentucky. Notification of the public meeting was sent to local residents adjacent to the SHF plant, and also published in local newspapers. Local and regional stakeholders, governments, and other interested parties were also informed of the publication of the Draft EIS and provided information about the public meeting. TVA received a total of 83 [[Page 4117]] comments from eight commenters in relation to the Draft EIS. The NOA for the Final EIS was published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2017. Decision TVA has chosen a phased decision-making approach for CCR Management at SHF. TVA has decided to construct and operate an onsite CCR Landfill at SHF. This decision would achieve a portion of the purpose and need of the project and avoid offsite transfer of CCR along public roads, thus eliminating the long-term impacts associated with air emissions, increased traffic and associated safety risks, and disruptions to the public that would be associated with such offsite transport under Alternative C--CCR Disposal at a Permitted Offsite Landfill. TVA is continuing to review and consider the alternatives regarding closure of Ash Impoundment 2 and the former SWL and will issue a decision and any additional documentation at a future date. Mitigation Measures TVA would use appropriate best management practices during all phases of construction and operation of the landfill. Mitigation measures, actions taken to reduce adverse impacts associated with proposed action, include:Due to the loss of potentially suitable foraging and roosting habitat for endangered bat species, TVA completed Section 7 consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Any tree removal would be scheduled so that all tree clearing would be conducted between October 15 and March 31, outside of the bats' breeding season. Prior to disturbing a 0.7-acre wetland on the Shawnee East Site, TVA would obtain a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for impacts that could occur in conjunction with clearing, excavating, or grading during landfill construction. Where impacts to wetlands cannot be avoided, TVA would mitigate impacts in accordance with the Section 404 permit, as determined in consultation with the USACE. To minimize visual and noise impacts, TVA would plant and maintain a vegetative buffer around the proposed CCR Landfill as a natural screen. TVA would avoid the sites in the vicinity of the Shawnee East Site that are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Dated: January 16, 2018. Robert M. Deacy, Sr., Senior Vice President, Generation Construction, Projects & Services. [FR Doc. 2018-01621 Filed 1-26-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 2018 / Notices 4115
DTAG members also shall be versed in TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY the plant include fly ash, bottom ash
the complexity of commercial defense and dry scrubber product.
trade and industrial competitiveness, Shawnee Fossil Plant New Coal The existing onsite landfill, formerly
and all members must be able to advise Combustion Residual Landfill the Special Waste Landfill (SWL), had a
the Bureau on these matters. While state landfill permit. However, it is now
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority. considered a CCR Landfill under a
members are expected to use their
ACTION: Issuance of Record of Decision. Registered Permit-by-Rule with the
expertise and provide candid advice,
national security and foreign policy Kentucky Division of Waste
SUMMARY: This notice is provided in Management effective September 21,
interests of the United States, as well as accordance with the Council on
the interests of the entities they 2017. The estimated remaining capacity
Environmental Quality’s regulations and for the former SWL is approximately 5.2
represent, shall be the bases for all Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) million cubic yards. Due to current and
policy and technical recommendations. procedures for implementing the projected SHF operations, it is expected
DTAG members’ responsibilities National Environmental Policy Act the former SWL will reach capacity by
include: (NEPA). TVA has decided to construct 2027. To accommodate the need for
and operate an onsite landfill at the
• Service for a consecutive two-year Shawnee Fossil Plant (SHF). A notice of
additional dry CCR storage at SHF, TVA
term which may be renewed or is proposing to design, build, and
availability (NOA) of the Final EIS for operate a new CCR Landfill that would
terminated at the discretion of the Shawnee Fossil Plant Coal Combustion
Assistant Secretary of State for Political- accommodate up to 20 additional years
Residual (CCR) Management was of storage capacity. SHF is expected to
Military Affairs (membership shall published in the Federal Register on
automatically terminate for members produce approximately 490,000 to
December 8, 2017. The Final EIS 910,000 cubic yards of CCR per year
who fail to attend two consecutive identified TVA’s preferred alternative as until 2040. The low-end of this range is
DTAG plenary meetings). Alternative B—Construction of an based on the current plant
• Making recommendations in Onsite CCR Landfill, Closure-in-Place of configuration, including the use of SCR
accordance with the DTAG Charter and Ash Impoundment 2 with a reduced and FGD systems on SHF Units 1 and
the FACA. footprint, and Closure-in-Place of the 4. The higher-end of this range provides
former Special Waste Landfill. TVA’s the maximum CCR output that could be
• Making policy and technical
current decision pertains only to the anticipated should TVA elect to explore
recommendations within the scope of
construction of a new onsite CCR the option of installing similar emission
the U.S. commercial export control landfill, and would achieve part of the
regime as mandated in the AECA, the controls on the other SHF units in the
project purpose and need by providing future. At present, TVA has no plans to
ITAR, and appropriate directives. additional long-term disposal for dry install such systems. Approximately 10
Please note that DTAG members may CCR materials produced at SHF. TVA is to 20 million cubic yards of disposal
not be reimbursed for travel, per diem, electing to further consider the capacity is desired for the 20-year SHF
and other expenses incurred in alternatives for closure of Ash comprehensive disposal plan.
connection with their duties as DTAG Impoundment 2 and the former Special The purpose of this action is to
members. How to apply: Applications in Waste Landfill (SWL) before making a support the need for additional capacity
response to this notice must contain the decision. for the long-term management of CCR at
following information: (1) Name of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SHF. Additional storage capacity would
applicant; (2) affirmation of U.S. Ashley Pilakowski, Project also enable TVA to continue operations
citizenship; (3) organizational affiliation Environmental Planning, NEPA at SHF as planned and would be
and title, as appropriate; (4) mailing Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, consistent with TVA’s voluntary
address; (5) work telephone number; (6) 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, commitment to convert wet CCR
email address; (7) resumé; and (8) TN 37902; telephone 865–632–2256, or management systems to dry systems.
summary of qualifications for DTAG by email aapilakowski@tva.gov. The Alternatives Considered
membership. Final EIS, this Record of Decision and In 2015, TVA performed a siting study
This information may be provided via other project documents are available on to evaluate onsite and offsite
two methods: TVA’s website https://www.tva.gov/ alternatives for the construction of a
nepa.
• Emailed to the following address: landfill for storage of dry CCR from
DTAG@State.Gov. In the subject field, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, SHF. The siting study identified six
please write, ‘‘DTAG Membership SHF consumes an average of 2.7 million alternative sites (Options 1 through 6),
Application.’’ cubic yards of coal per year and within 5 to 10 miles of the plant, for the
generates approximately 8 billion construction and operation of a new
• Send in hardcopy to the following kilowatt-hours of electricity a year CCR Landfill. The siting study also
address: Mr. Glenn E. Smith, PM/DDTC, (enough to supply 540,000 homes). considered the offsite transport of CCR
SA–1, 12th Floor, Directorate of Defense Until December 2017, SHF produced to one of three existing permitted third-
Trade Controls, Bureau of Political approximately 183,000 cubic yards of party landfills as a potential alternative.
Military Affairs, U.S. Department of coal combustion residuals (CCR) a year. The impacts of development and/or use
State, Washington, DC 20522–0112. In December 2017, newly installed of each of the landfill alternatives were
All applications must be postmarked selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and further evaluated against environmental
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
by March 2, 2018. flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems and engineering factors to determine
became operational on SHF Units 1 and those sites that should be carried
Anthony Dearth, 4, increasing the amount of CCR to an forward for further analysis in the study.
Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Defense estimated 490,000 cubic yards per year. Ultimately, one site for construction and
Trade Advisory Group, Department of State. All CCR currently are managed in the operation of a new CCR Landfill (Option
[FR Doc. 2018–01530 Filed 1–26–18; 8:45 am] existing onsite landfill and Ash 1) and one existing permitted third-
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P Impoundment 2. The CCR generated by party landfill (Freedom Waste Landfill)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Jan 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_4134/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 2018 / Notices 4117
comments from eight commenters in Dated: January 16, 2018. Thursday, March 1, 2018, 9:00 a.m.–
relation to the Draft EIS. Robert M. Deacy, Sr., 5:00 p.m.
The NOA for the Final EIS was Senior Vice President, Generation 8. Working Group Sessions
published in the Federal Register on Construction, Projects & Services.
December 8, 2017. [FR Doc. 2018–01621 Filed 1–26–18; 8:45 am] Friday, March 2, 2018, 9:00 a.m.–12:00
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
p.m.
Decision
9. Working Group Sessions
TVA has chosen a phased decision- 10. Approve Draft ED–77A/DO–201B for
making approach for CCR Management DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRAC Process
at SHF. TVA has decided to construct 11. Meeting Wrap-Up: Main
and operate an onsite CCR Landfill at Federal Aviation Administration Conclusions and Way Forward
SHF. This decision would achieve a 12. Review of Action Items
portion of the purpose and need of the Thirty Second RTCA SC–217 13. Next Meetings
project and avoid offsite transfer of CCR Aeronautical Databases Joint Plenary 14. Any Other Business
along public roads, thus eliminating the With EUROCAE Working Group #44 15. Adjourn
long-term impacts associated with air AGENCY: Federal Aviation Attendance is open to the interested
emissions, increased traffic and Administration (FAA), U.S. Department public but limited to space availability.
associated safety risks, and disruptions of Transportation (DOT). Registration is required to attend. With
to the public that would be associated the approval of the chairman, members
ACTION: Thirty Second RTCA SC–217
with such offsite transport under of the public may present oral
Aeronautical Databases Joint Plenary
Alternative C—CCR Disposal at a statements at the meeting. Persons
with EUROCAE Working Group #44.
Permitted Offsite Landfill. wishing to attend, present statements or
TVA is continuing to review and SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice obtain information should contact the
consider the alternatives regarding to advise the public of a meeting of person listed in the FOR FURTHER
closure of Ash Impoundment 2 and the Thirty Second RTCA SC–217 INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members
former SWL and will issue a decision Aeronautical Databases Joint Plenary of the public may present a written
and any additional documentation at a with EUROCAE Working Group #44. statement to the committee at any time.
future date. DATES: The meeting will be held
Issued in Washington, DC on January
February 27—March 2, 2018 9:00 a.m.— 24, 2018.
Mitigation Measures
5:00 p.m. Mohannad Dawoud,
TVA would use appropriate best ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Management & Program Analyst, Partnership
management practices during all phases EUROCONTROL—Rue de la Fusée, 96 Contracts Branch, ANG–A17, NextGen,
of construction and operation of the 1130, Brussels (Haren), Belgium. Procurement Services Division, Federal
landfill. Mitigation measures, actions Registration is required to attend. Aviation Administration.
taken to reduce adverse impacts [FR Doc. 2018–01560 Filed 1–26–18; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
associated with proposed action, BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Rebecca Morrison at rmorrison@rtca.org
include:
or 202–330–0654, or The RTCA
• Due to the loss of potentially Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW, Suite
suitable foraging and roosting habitat for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by
endangered bat species, TVA completed telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
Section 7 consultation with the United Federal Aviation Administration
833–9434, or website at http://
States Fish and Wildlife Service www.rtca.org. One Hundredth RTCA SC–159
(USFWS). Any tree removal would be Navigation Equipment Using the
scheduled so that all tree clearing would SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Global Navigation Satellite System
be conducted between October 15 and (GNSS) Plenary
March 31, outside of the bats’ breeding Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
season. 463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby AGENCY: Federal Aviation
given for a meeting of the Thirty Second
• Prior to disturbing a 0.7-acre Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
RTCA SC–217 Aeronautical Databases of Transportation (DOT).
wetland on the Shawnee East Site, TVA
Joint Plenary with EUROCAE Working
would obtain a Clean Water Act Section ACTION: One Hundredth RTCA SC–159
Group #44. The agenda will include the
404 permit for impacts that could occur Navigation Equipment Using the Global
following:
in conjunction with clearing, Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
excavating, or grading during landfill Tuesday, February 27, 2018, 9:00 a.m.– Plenary.
construction. Where impacts to 5:00 p.m.
wetlands cannot be avoided, TVA SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice
1. Housekeeping & Meeting Logistics to advise the public of a meeting of One
would mitigate impacts in accordance 2. DFO Statement and RTCA/EUROCAE
with the Section 404 permit, as Hundredth RTCA SC–159 Navigation
IP and Membership Policies Equipment Using the Global Navigation
determined in consultation with the 3. Approve Minutes From 30th Meeting
USACE. Satellite System (GNSS) Plenary.
of SC–217/WG–44
• To minimize visual and noise DATES: The meeting will be held March
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
4. Review and Approve Meeting Agenda
impacts, TVA would plant and maintain 16, 2018 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
for 30th Meeting of SC–217/WG–44
a vegetative buffer around the proposed 5. Action Item List Review ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at:
CCR Landfill as a natural screen. 6. Working Group Sessions RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street
• TVA would avoid the sites in the NW, Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.
vicinity of the Shawnee East Site that Wednesday, February 28, 2018, 9:00 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
are eligible for the National Register of a.m.–5:00 p.m. Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org
Historic Places. 7. Working Group Sessions or 202–330–0680, or The RTCA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Jan 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_4134/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-01-27 00:57:56
Document Modified: 2018-01-27 00:57:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Issuance of Record of Decision. | |
| Contact | Ashley Pilakowski, Project Environmental Planning, NEPA Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN 37902; telephone 865-632-2256, or by email [email protected] The Final EIS, this Record of Decision and other project documents are available on TVA's website https://www.tva.gov/nepa. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 4115 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR