83 FR 42212 - Final Requirement-State Technical Assistance Projects To Improve Services and Results for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind and National Technical Assistance and Dissemination Center for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind (TA&D-DB)

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 162 (August 21, 2018)

Page Range		42212-42214
FR Document		2018-18027
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services announces a requirement under the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities (TA&D) program. The Assistant Secretary may use this requirement for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2018 and later years.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42212-42214]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18027]



[[Page 42212]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Chapter III

[Docket ID ED-2018-OSERS-0024]


Final Requirement--State Technical Assistance Projects To Improve 
Services and Results for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind and National 
Technical Assistance and Dissemination Center for Children Who Are 
Deaf-Blind (TA&D-DB)

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 
Department of Education.

ACTION: Final requirement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.326T.

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 
Rehabilitative Services announces a requirement under the Technical 
Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for 
Children with Disabilities (TA&D) program. The Assistant Secretary may 
use this requirement for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2018 and 
later years.

DATES: This requirement is effective September 20, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo Ann McCann, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5162, Potomac Center Plaza, 
Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-7434. Email: 
[email protected].
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of Program: The purpose of the 
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results 
for Children with Disabilities program is to promote academic 
achievement and to improve results for children with disabilities by 
providing technical assistance (TA), supporting model demonstration 
projects, disseminating useful information, and implementing activities 
that are supported by scientifically based research.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1461, 1463, 1481, and 1482.
    We published a notice of proposed requirement (NPR) in the Federal 
Register on June 20, 2018 (83 FR 28566). That notice contained 
background information and our reasons for proposing this particular 
requirement. The only difference between the proposed requirement and 
this final requirement is that we included a footnote within the final 
requirement explaining that this requirement does not apply to the 
National Technical Assistance and Dissemination Center for Children Who 
Are Deaf-Blind. This is not a substantive change because we explained 
in the Background section of the NPR that it was not our intent to 
apply this requirement to that Center.
    Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPR, 10 
parties submitted comments on the proposed requirement. Generally, we 
do not address technical and other minor changes, or suggested changes 
that the law does not authorize us to make under applicable statutory 
authority. In addition, we do not address general comments that raised 
concerns not directly related to the proposed priorities or 
definitions.
    Analysis of the Comments and Changes: An analysis of the comments 
follows.
    Comment: The majority of commenters expressed support for limiting 
the indirect cost rate to 10 percent, indicating that this would allow 
more funding for the State Deaf-Blind Projects to provide TA to 
families and caregivers, professionals, and others providing services 
to children who are deaf-blind.
    Discussion: We appreciate the commenters' support and agree with 
the comments for the reasons stated.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter expressed support for the cap on indirect 
cost rates but raised a concern that some current State Deaf-Blind 
Projects that are university-based may not apply for future 
competitions because of the cap, leading to a loss of services for 
children who are deaf-blind within those States. The commenter 
suggested that the Department consider allowing universities to reach 
individual agreements with the Department on indirect cost rates. 
Another commenter opposed the proposed cap, arguing that negotiated 
indirect cost rates better ensure that necessary administrative costs 
for university-based State projects are covered and, therefore, that 
the proposed cap on indirect cost rates could jeopardize sound 
administration of State projects.
    Discussion: We appreciate the commenters' concern regarding the 
potential for disruption of services for children who are deaf-blind 
within a State in the event an incumbent applicant does not apply for a 
new award under this program. We also appreciate the commenter's 
concern about the proper administrative oversight of State projects and 
we agree that strong administrative oversight is essential. However, 
many State deaf-blind projects, including university-based projects, 
have operated effectively while applying indirect costs at or below 10 
percent of their modified total direct costs. For this reason, we do 
not believe that the 10 percent cap established in this final rule will 
deprive the Deaf-Blind program of university-based applicants. We also 
believe that limiting the indirect cost rate, for university-based and 
non-university based projects, will not undermine sound administrative 
oversight of projects, but rather will be beneficial to the program and 
its intended beneficiaries and can be achieved with minimal disruption 
to project activities.
    Finally, since this is a competitive grant competition, it would be 
inappropriate, as one commenter suggests, to have separate requirements 
for incumbent grantees unavailable to other grantees.
    Changes: None.
    Comment: One commenter stated that changes to the indirect cost 
rate for this program could cause confusion if a grantee also has other 
approved indirect cost rates from a Federal agency.
    Discussion: We appreciate the commenter's concern about potential 
confusion if a grantee has another negotiated indirect cost rate 
granted by either the Department of Education or another Federal 
agency. We believe that grantees with sufficient administrative 
capacity to participate in this program will not find it difficult to 
apply different indirect cost rates to grants from different agencies. 
However, to minimize the risk of confusion cited by the commenter, the 
Department is prepared to provide all necessary technical assistance to 
grantees under this program to ensure that they understand the new 
requirement and charge the appropriate indirect cost rate to the grant.
    Changes: None.

Final Requirement

    The Assistant Secretary establishes the following requirement for 
this program. We may apply this requirement in any fiscal year in which 
this program is in effect.
    Final Requirement:
    Allowable indirect costs.
    A grantee may recover the lesser of (a) its actual indirect costs 
as determined by the grantee's negotiated indirect cost rate agreement 
and (b) 10 percent of its modified total direct costs. If a grantee's 
allocable indirect costs exceed 10 percent of its modified total direct 
costs, the grantee may not recoup the excess by shifting the cost to 
other grants or contracts with the U.S. Government,

[[Page 42213]]

unless specifically authorized by legislation. The grantee must use 
non-Federal revenue sources to pay for such unrecovered costs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The National Technical Assistance and Dissemination Center 
for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind (CFDA number 84.326T) (National 
Center) is not subject to this limitation on recovery of indirect 
costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice does not preclude the Department from proposing 
additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection 
criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
    Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in 
which we choose to use this priority and these requirements, we invite 
applications through a notice in the Federal Register.

Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771

Regulatory Impact Analysis

    Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether 
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to 
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely 
to result in a rule that may--
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, 
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, 
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or 
Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to 
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
    (2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, 
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the 
Executive order.
    This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action 
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
    Under Executive Order 13771, for each new regulation that the 
Department proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates 
that is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and 
that imposes total costs greater than zero, it must identify two 
deregulatory actions. For FY 2018, any new incremental costs associated 
with a new regulation must be fully offset by the elimination of 
existing costs through deregulatory actions, unless required by law or 
approved in writing by the Director of OMB. However, Executive Order 
13771 does not apply to ``transfer rules'' that cause only income 
transfers between taxpayers and program beneficiaries, such as those 
regarding discretionary grant programs. Because this final requirement 
would be utilized in connection with a discretionary grant program, the 
requirement to offset new regulations in Executive Order 13771 does not 
apply.
    We have also reviewed this final regulatory action under Executive 
Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, 
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in 
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order 
13563 requires that an agency--
    (1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination 
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits 
and costs are difficult to quantify);
    (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, 
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into 
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of 
cumulative regulations;
    (3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select 
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential 
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
    (4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather 
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must 
adopt; and
    (5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct 
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or 
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide 
information that enables the public to make choices.
    Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best 
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future 
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these 
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs 
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated 
behavioral changes.''
    We are issuing this final requirement based on a reasoned 
determination that the benefits would justify the costs. In choosing 
among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected this approach to 
maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the 
Department believes that this regulatory action is consistent with the 
principles in Executive Order 13563.
    We also have determined that this regulatory action would not 
unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the 
exercise of their governmental functions.
    In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has 
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and 
qualitative, of this regulatory action. This regulatory action may 
result in a subset of grantees under this program recovering less funds 
for indirect costs than they would otherwise have recovered prior to 
this final new maximum indirect cost rate, which could impact their 
operations. Further, it could result in particular entities not seeking 
funding under this program because of an inability to operate under 
this final new maximum indirect cost rate. However, we believe that the 
benefits to program beneficiaries of utilizing a higher percentage of 
program funds for direct services outweigh these costs.
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: This document does not contain 
Paperwork Reduction Act requirements. The Technical Assistance and 
Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with 
Disabilities program has been approved by OMB to collect data under OMB 
1820-0028. The final requirement would not impact the approved and 
active data collection.
    Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive 
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the 
objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental 
partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies 
on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination 
and review of final Federal financial assistance. This document 
provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this 
program.
    Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this 
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact persons 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations via the Federal Digital System at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site you can view this

[[Page 42214]]

document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at: 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

    Dated: August 16, 2018.
Johnny W. Collett,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2018-18027 Filed 8-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
42212 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION explaining that this requirement does blind projects, including university-
not apply to the National Technical based projects, have operated effectively
34 CFR Chapter III Assistance and Dissemination Center for while applying indirect costs at or
[Docket ID ED–2018–OSERS–0024] Children Who Are Deaf-Blind. This is below 10 percent of their modified total
not a substantive change because we direct costs. For this reason, we do not
Final Requirement—State Technical explained in the Background section of believe that the 10 percent cap
Assistance Projects To Improve the NPR that it was not our intent to established in this final rule will
Services and Results for Children Who apply this requirement to that Center. deprive the Deaf-Blind program of
Are Deaf-Blind and National Technical Public Comment: In response to our university-based applicants. We also
Assistance and Dissemination Center invitation in the NPR, 10 parties believe that limiting the indirect cost
for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind submitted comments on the proposed rate, for university-based and non-
(TA&D–DB) requirement. Generally, we do not university based projects, will not
address technical and other minor undermine sound administrative
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and changes, or suggested changes that the oversight of projects, but rather will be
Rehabilitative Services, Department of law does not authorize us to make under beneficial to the program and its
Education. applicable statutory authority. In intended beneficiaries and can be
ACTION: Final requirement. addition, we do not address general achieved with minimal disruption to
comments that raised concerns not project activities.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance directly related to the proposed Finally, since this is a competitive
(CFDA) Number: 84.326T. priorities or definitions. grant competition, it would be
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Analysis of the Comments and inappropriate, as one commenter
Special Education and Rehabilitative Changes: An analysis of the comments suggests, to have separate requirements
Services announces a requirement follows. for incumbent grantees unavailable to
Comment: The majority of other grantees.
under the Technical Assistance and
commenters expressed support for Changes: None.
Dissemination to Improve Services and
limiting the indirect cost rate to 10 Comment: One commenter stated that
Results for Children with Disabilities percent, indicating that this would
(TA&D) program. The Assistant changes to the indirect cost rate for this
allow more funding for the State Deaf- program could cause confusion if a
Secretary may use this requirement for Blind Projects to provide TA to families
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2018 grantee also has other approved indirect
and caregivers, professionals, and others cost rates from a Federal agency.
and later years. providing services to children who are Discussion: We appreciate the
DATES: This requirement is effective deaf-blind. commenter’s concern about potential
September 20, 2018. Discussion: We appreciate the confusion if a grantee has another
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo commenters’ support and agree with the negotiated indirect cost rate granted by
Ann McCann, U.S. Department of comments for the reasons stated. either the Department of Education or
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Changes: None. another Federal agency. We believe that
Room 5162, Potomac Center Plaza, Comment: One commenter expressed grantees with sufficient administrative
Washington, DC 20202–5076. support for the cap on indirect cost rates capacity to participate in this program
Telephone: (202) 245–7434. Email: but raised a concern that some current will not find it difficult to apply
Jo.Ann.McCann@ed.gov. State Deaf-Blind Projects that are different indirect cost rates to grants
If you use a telecommunications university-based may not apply for from different agencies. However, to
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text future competitions because of the cap, minimize the risk of confusion cited by
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay leading to a loss of services for children the commenter, the Department is
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–8339. who are deaf-blind within those States. prepared to provide all necessary
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of The commenter suggested that the technical assistance to grantees under
Program: The purpose of the Technical Department consider allowing this program to ensure that they
Assistance and Dissemination to universities to reach individual understand the new requirement and
Improve Services and Results for agreements with the Department on charge the appropriate indirect cost rate
Children with Disabilities program is to indirect cost rates. Another commenter to the grant.
promote academic achievement and to opposed the proposed cap, arguing that Changes: None.
improve results for children with negotiated indirect cost rates better
disabilities by providing technical ensure that necessary administrative Final Requirement
assistance (TA), supporting model costs for university-based State projects The Assistant Secretary establishes
demonstration projects, disseminating are covered and, therefore, that the the following requirement for this
useful information, and implementing proposed cap on indirect cost rates program. We may apply this
activities that are supported by could jeopardize sound administration requirement in any fiscal year in which
scientifically based research. of State projects. this program is in effect.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1461, Discussion: We appreciate the Final Requirement:
1463, 1481, and 1482. commenters’ concern regarding the Allowable indirect costs.
We published a notice of proposed potential for disruption of services for A grantee may recover the lesser of (a)
requirement (NPR) in the Federal children who are deaf-blind within a its actual indirect costs as determined
Register on June 20, 2018 (83 FR 28566). State in the event an incumbent by the grantee’s negotiated indirect cost
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

That notice contained background applicant does not apply for a new rate agreement and (b) 10 percent of its
information and our reasons for award under this program. We also modified total direct costs. If a grantee’s
proposing this particular requirement. appreciate the commenter’s concern allocable indirect costs exceed 10
The only difference between the about the proper administrative percent of its modified total direct costs,
proposed requirement and this final oversight of State projects and we agree the grantee may not recoup the excess
requirement is that we included a that strong administrative oversight is by shifting the cost to other grants or
footnote within the final requirement essential. However, many State deaf- contracts with the U.S. Government,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM 21AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 42213

unless specifically authorized by existing costs through deregulatory to maximize net benefits. Based on the
legislation. The grantee must use non- actions, unless required by law or analysis that follows, the Department
Federal revenue sources to pay for such approved in writing by the Director of believes that this regulatory action is
unrecovered costs.1 OMB. However, Executive Order 13771 consistent with the principles in
This notice does not preclude the does not apply to ‘‘transfer rules’’ that Executive Order 13563.
Department from proposing additional cause only income transfers between We also have determined that this
priorities, requirements, definitions, or taxpayers and program beneficiaries, regulatory action would not unduly
selection criteria, subject to meeting such as those regarding discretionary interfere with State, local, and Tribal
applicable rulemaking requirements. grant programs. Because this final governments in the exercise of their
Note: This notice does not solicit requirement would be utilized in governmental functions.
applications. In any year in which we connection with a discretionary grant In accordance with both Executive
choose to use this priority and these program, the requirement to offset new orders, the Department has assessed the
requirements, we invite applications regulations in Executive Order 13771 potential costs and benefits, both
through a notice in the Federal Register. does not apply. quantitative and qualitative, of this
We have also reviewed this final regulatory action. This regulatory action
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and regulatory action under Executive Order may result in a subset of grantees under
13771 13563, which supplements and this program recovering less funds for
Regulatory Impact Analysis explicitly reaffirms the principles, indirect costs than they would
structures, and definitions governing otherwise have recovered prior to this
Under Executive Order 12866, the
regulatory review established in final new maximum indirect cost rate,
Secretary must determine whether this which could impact their operations.
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, Further, it could result in particular
permitted by law, Executive Order
therefore, subject to the requirements of entities not seeking funding under this
13563 requires that an agency—
the Executive order and subject to program because of an inability to
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
review by the Office of Management and operate under this final new maximum
upon a reasoned determination that
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive indirect cost rate. However, we believe
their benefits justify their costs
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant that the benefits to program
(recognizing that some benefits and
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to beneficiaries of utilizing a higher
costs are difficult to quantify);
result in a rule that may— (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the percentage of program funds for direct
(1) Have an annual effect on the least burden on society, consistent with services outweigh these costs.
economy of $100 million or more, or obtaining regulatory objectives and Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
adversely affect a sector of the economy, taking into account—among other things This document does not contain
productivity, competition, jobs, the and to the extent practicable—the costs Paperwork Reduction Act requirements.
environment, public health or safety, or of cumulative regulations; The Technical Assistance and
State, local or Tribal governments or (3) In choosing among alternative Dissemination to Improve Services and
communities in a material way (also regulatory approaches, select those Results for Children with Disabilities
referred to as an ‘‘economically approaches that maximize net benefits program has been approved by OMB to
significant’’ rule); (including potential economic, collect data under OMB 1820–0028. The
(2) Create serious inconsistency or environmental, public health and safety, final requirement would not impact the
otherwise interfere with an action taken and other advantages; distributive approved and active data collection.
or planned by another agency; impacts; and equity); Intergovernmental Review: This
(3) Materially alter the budgetary (4) To the extent feasible, specify program is subject to Executive Order
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, performance objectives, rather than the 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
or loan programs or the rights and behavior or manner of compliance a part 79. One of the objectives of the
obligations of recipients thereof; or regulated entity must adopt; and Executive order is to foster an
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues (5) Identify and assess available intergovernmental partnership and a
arising out of legal mandates, the alternatives to direct regulation, strengthened federalism. The Executive
President’s priorities, or the principles including economic incentives—such as order relies on processes developed by
stated in the Executive order. user fees or marketable permits—to State and local governments for
This final regulatory action is not a encourage the desired behavior, or coordination and review of final Federal
significant regulatory action subject to provide information that enables the financial assistance. This document
review by OMB under section 3(f) of public to make choices. provides early notification of our
Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563 also requires specific plans and actions for this
Under Executive Order 13771, for an agency ‘‘to use the best available program.
each new regulation that the techniques to quantify anticipated Accessible Format: Individuals with
Department proposes for notice and present and future benefits and costs as disabilities can obtain this document in
comment or otherwise promulgates that accurately as possible.’’ The Office of an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
is a significant regulatory action under Information and Regulatory Affairs of print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
Executive Order 12866 and that imposes OMB has emphasized that these request to the program contact persons
total costs greater than zero, it must techniques may include ‘‘identifying listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
identify two deregulatory actions. For changing future compliance costs that CONTACT.
FY 2018, any new incremental costs might result from technological Electronic Access to This Document:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

associated with a new regulation must innovation or anticipated behavioral The official version of this document is
be fully offset by the elimination of changes.’’ the document published in the Federal
We are issuing this final requirement Register. You may access the official
1 The National Technical Assistance and
based on a reasoned determination that edition of the Federal Register and the
Dissemination Center for Children Who Are Deaf-
Blind (CFDA number 84.326T) (National Center) is
the benefits would justify the costs. In Code of Federal Regulations via the
not subject to this limitation on recovery of indirect choosing among alternative regulatory Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/
costs. approaches, we selected this approach fdsys. At this site you can view this

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM 21AUR1
Document Created: 2018-08-21 00:06:28
Document Modified: 2018-08-21 00:06:28
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final requirement.
Dates		This requirement is effective September 20, 2018.
Contact		Jo Ann McCann, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5162, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-7434. Email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 42212