83 FR 42850 - Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Exemption From Design-Build Selection Procedures (DFARS Case 2018-D011)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 165 (August 24, 2018)
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 165 (August 24, 2018)
| Page Range | 42850-42851 | |
| FR Document | 2018-18243 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 42850-42851] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-18243] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Part 236 [Docket DARS-2018-0039] RIN 0750-AJ75 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Exemption From Design-Build Selection Procedures (DFARS Case 2018-D011) AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 that allows for more than five offerors on solicitations issued using two-phase design-build selection procedures for indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts that exceed $4 million. DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before October 23, 2018, to be considered in the formation of a final rule. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2018-D011, using any of the following methods: [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Search for ``DFARS Case 2018-D011''. Select ``Submit a Comment Now'' and follow the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS Case 2018-D011'' on any attached document. [cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2018-D011 in the subject line of the message. [cir] Fax: 571-372-6094. [cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Heather Kitchens, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Comments received generally will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Kitchens, telephone 571- 372-6104. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background This rule proposes to revise the DFARS to implement section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91). Section 823 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305a to allow for more than the maximum number of five offerors when a solicitation is issued using two-phase design-build selection procedures for an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract that exceeds $4 million. Prior to the amendments made by section 823, 10 U.S.C. 2305a required the head of the contracting activity to approve the contracting officer's justification that it is in the best interest of the Government to exceed the maximum number of five offerors that may be selected to submit phase-two proposals, if certain conditions apply. Section 823 eliminates the requirement for such a justification when the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million. II. Discussion and Analysis The two-phase design-build selection procedures authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2305a are implemented at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 36.3. The statutory requirement for a contracting officer to justify exceeding the maximum number of five offerors is implemented at FAR 36.303-1(a)(4). This rule proposes to implement section 823 by adding a new DFARS section 236.303-1(a)(4), to be used in lieu of the procedures at FAR 36.303-1(a)(4). The new DFARS section implements 10 U.S.C. 2305a, as amended by section 823, by providing--The new authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million; The authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the contracting officer's decision is approved by the head of the contracting activity when the solicitation is for a contract that exceeds $4 million; and A statement that the number of offerors is at the contracting officer's discretion when the solicitation is for a contract that does not exceed $4 million. [[Page 42851]] III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items This rule does not propose to create any new provisions or clauses or impact any existing provisions or clauses. IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. V. Executive Order 13771 This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs, regulatory action, because this proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., because the scope of the rule only changes internal Government operating procedures for the design-build selection procedures. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows: This rule proposes to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (DFARS) to implement section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91). Section 823 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305a to allow contracting officers to exceed the maximum number of five offerors for solicitations issued using two-phase design-build selection procedures for indefinite- delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that exceed $4 million. The objective of this rule is to implement the statutory changes to the two-phase design-build selection procedures by adding a new DFARS section 236.303-1(a)(4), to be used in lieu of Federal Acquisition Regulation 23.303-1(a)(4). The new DFARS section provides-- The new authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million; The authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the contracting officer's decision is approved by the head of the contracting activity when the solicitation is for a contract that exceeds $4 million; and A statement that the number of offerors is at the contracting officer's discretion when the solicitation is for a contract that does not exceed $4 million. The legal basis for this rule is section 823 of the NDAA for FY 2018. Based on FY 2017 data from the Federal Procurement Data System, DoD issued approximately 499 new awards for construction exceeding $4 million, to include IDIQ contracts, purchase orders, and orders under basic ordering agreements. Of the 499 new awards for construction, approximately 305 awards were made to 252 unique small businesses entities. This proposed rule does not include any new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small entities. However, this rule may create additional opportunities for small entities, because the rule allows the maximum number of offerors selected to submit phase-two proposals to exceed five, when the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract valued at greater than $4 million, without requiring additional justification or approval. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules. There are no known significant alternative approaches to the proposed rule that would meet the requirements of the applicable statute. DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small entities. DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2018-D011), in correspondence. VI. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 236 Government procurement. Jennifer Lee Hawes, Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR 236 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 236--CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 0 1. The authority citation for part 236 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 0 2. Add subpart 236.3 to read as follows: Subpart 236.3--Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures Sec. 236.303-1 Phase One Subpart 236.3--Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures 236.303-1 Phase One. (4) In lieu of the requirements at FAR 36.303-1(a)(4)-- (i) If the contract value exceeds $4 million, the maximum number of offerors specified in the solicitation that are to be selected to submit phase-two proposals shall not exceed five, unless-- (A) The solicitation is issued for an indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract for design-build construction; or (B) The head of the contracting activity, delegable to a level no lower than the senior contracting official within the contracting activity, approves the contracting officer's decision with respect to an individual solicitation, that a maximum number greater than five is in the best interest of the Government and is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures. The decision shall be documented in the contract file (10 U.S.C 2305a(d)). (ii) If the contract value is at or below $4 million, the maximum number of offerors specified in the solicitation that are to be selected to submit phase-two proposals is at the discretion of the contracting officer. [FR Doc. 2018-18243 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06ep-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules 42851
III. Applicability to Contracts at or 23.303–1(a)(4). The new DFARS section List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 236
Below the Simplified Acquisition provides—
Threshold and for Commercial Items, • The new authority to exceed the Government procurement.
Including Commercially Available Off- five offeror maximum when the Jennifer Lee Hawes,
the-Shelf Items solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
This rule does not propose to create exceeds $4 million; Acquisition Regulations System.
any new provisions or clauses or impact • The authority to exceed the five
any existing provisions or clauses. offeror maximum when the contracting Therefore, 48 CFR 236 is proposed to
officer’s decision is approved by the be amended as follows:
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
head of the contracting activity when
Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866 and the solicitation is for a contract that PART 236—CONSTRUCTION AND
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs exceeds $4 million; and ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS
and benefits of available regulatory • A statement that the number of
alternatives and, if regulation is offerors is at the contracting officer’s ■ 1. The authority citation for part 236
necessary, to select regulatory discretion when the solicitation is for a continues to read as follows:
approaches that maximize net benefits contract that does not exceed $4
(including potential economic, Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
million. chapter 1.
environmental, public health and safety
The legal basis for this rule is section
effects, distributive impacts, and ■ 2. Add subpart 236.3 to read as
823 of the NDAA for FY 2018.
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the follows:
importance of quantifying both costs Based on FY 2017 data from the
and benefits, of reducing costs, of Federal Procurement Data System, DoD Subpart 236.3—Two-Phase Design-Build
harmonizing rules, and of promoting issued approximately 499 new awards Selection Procedures
flexibility. This is not a significant for construction exceeding $4 million,
Sec.
regulatory action and, therefore, was not to include IDIQ contracts, purchase
236.303–1 Phase One
subject to review under section 6(b) of orders, and orders under basic ordering
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and agreements. Of the 499 new awards for Subpart 236.3—Two-Phase Design-
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This construction, approximately 305 awards Build Selection Procedures
is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. were made to 252 unique small
businesses entities. 236.303–1 Phase One.
V. Executive Order 13771 This proposed rule does not include
(4) In lieu of the requirements at FAR
This proposed rule is not expected to any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
be an E.O. 13771, Reducing Regulation 36.303–1(a)(4)—
other compliance requirements for small
and Controlling Regulatory Costs, entities. However, this rule may create (i) If the contract value exceeds $4
regulatory action, because this proposed additional opportunities for small million, the maximum number of
rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. entities, because the rule allows the offerors specified in the solicitation that
maximum number of offerors selected to are to be selected to submit phase-two
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
submit phase-two proposals to exceed proposals shall not exceed five, unless—
DoD does not expect this proposed five, when the solicitation is for an IDIQ
rule to have a significant economic (A) The solicitation is issued for an
contract valued at greater than $4 indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity
impact on a substantial number of small million, without requiring additional
entities within the meaning of the contract for design-build construction;
justification or approval. or
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
et seq., because the scope of the rule or conflict with any other Federal rules. (B) The head of the contracting
only changes internal Government activity, delegable to a level no lower
operating procedures for the design- There are no known significant
alternative approaches to the proposed than the senior contracting official
build selection procedures. However, an within the contracting activity, approves
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has rule that would meet the requirements
of the applicable statute. the contracting officer’s decision with
been performed and is summarized as respect to an individual solicitation,
follows: DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested that a maximum number greater than
This rule proposes to amend the
parties on the expected impact of this five is in the best interest of the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
rule on small entities. Government and is consistent with the
(DFARS) to implement section 823 of
DoD will also consider comments purposes and objectives of the two-
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. from small entities concerning the phase selection procedures. The
L. 115–91). Section 823 amends 10 existing regulations in subparts affected decision shall be documented in the
U.S.C. 2305a to allow contracting by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. contract file (10 U.S.C 2305a(d)).
officers to exceed the maximum number 610. Interested parties must submit such (ii) If the contract value is at or below
of five offerors for solicitations issued comments separately and should cite 5 $4 million, the maximum number of
using two-phase design-build selection U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2018–D011), in offerors specified in the solicitation that
procedures for indefinite-delivery, correspondence.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
are to be selected to submit phase-two
indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that VI. Paperwork Reduction Act proposals is at the discretion of the
exceed $4 million. contracting officer.
The objective of this rule is to The rule does not contain any
[FR Doc. 2018–18243 Filed 8–23–18; 8:45 am]
implement the statutory changes to the information collection requirements that
BILLING CODE 5001–06ep–P
two-phase design-build selection require the approval of the Office of
procedures by adding a new DFARS Management and Budget under the
section 236.303–1(a)(4), to be used in Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
lieu of Federal Acquisition Regulation chapter 35).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:08 Aug 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM 24AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_43015/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-24 04:14:31
Document Modified: 2018-08-24 04:14:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to | |
| Contact | Ms. Heather Kitchens, telephone 571- 372-6104. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 42850 | |
| RIN Number | 0750-AJ75 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR