83 FR 43972 - Alabama Regulatory Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 168 (August 29, 2018)

Page Range		43972-43974
FR Document		2018-18716

We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Alabama regulatory program (Alabama program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama proposed revisions to its program regarding permit fees. Alabama revised its program at its own initiative to raise revenues sufficient to fund the Alabama Surface Mining Commission's (ASMC) share of costs to administer the Alabama coal regulatory program, including the reviewing, administering, inspecting, and enforcing of surface coal mining permits in Alabama.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43972-43974]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 901

[SATS No. AL-082-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2017-0011; S1D1S SS08011000 
SX064A000 189S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 18XS501520]


Alabama Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Alabama regulatory program 
(Alabama program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 
of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama proposed revisions to its program 
regarding permit fees. Alabama revised its program at its own 
initiative to raise revenues sufficient to fund the Alabama Surface 
Mining Commission's (ASMC) share of costs to administer the Alabama 
coal regulatory program, including the reviewing, administering, 
inspecting, and enforcing of surface coal mining permits in Alabama.

DATES: The effective date is September 28, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Joseph, Acting Director, 
Birmingham Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood, Alabama 35209. 
Telephone: (205) 290-7282. Email: bjoseph@osmre.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Alabama Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decisions
VI. Procedural Determinations

I. Background on the Alabama Program

    Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the 
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that 
its program includes, among other things, State laws and regulations 
that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations in 
accordance with the requirements of the Act and consistent with the 
Federal regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of 
these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved 
the Alabama program effective May 20, 1982. You can find background 
information on the Alabama program, including the Secretary's findings, 
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the 
Alabama program in the May 20, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 22030). 
You can also find later actions concerning the Alabama program and 
program amendments at 30 CFR 901.10, 901.15, and 901.16.

II. Submission of the Amendment

    By email dated August 14, 2017 (Administrative Record No. AL-0672), 
Alabama sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 
et seq.) at its own initiative.
    We announced the receipt of the proposed amendment in the January 
22, 2018, Federal Register (83 FR 2953). In the same document, we 
opened the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a 
public hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not 
hold a public hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The 
public comment period ended on February 21, 2018. We received four 
public comments (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-03) that are 
addressed in the Public Comments section of IV, Summary and Disposition 
of Comments, below.

III. OSMRE's Findings

    We are approving the amendment as described below. The following 
are findings we made concerning Alabama's amendment under SMCRA and the 
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. Any revisions that we 
do not specifically discuss below concerning non-substantive wording or 
editorial changes can be found in the full text of the program 
amendment available at www.regulations.gov.

Alabama Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07

    Alabama proposed to revise its regulations at Alabama 
Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07, increasing coal mining permit fees to 
adequately fund the ASMC for the purposes of reviewing, administering, 
inspecting, and enforcing surface coal mining permits in Alabama.
    By this amendment, Alabama is:
    (1) Increasing the initial acreage fee from $35.00 per acre to 
$75.00, to be paid on each acre in a permit covered by a performance 
bond prior to the initiation of operations on the permit (or on an 
increment if increments are used), and to be paid on all bonded acreage 
covered by a permit renewal;
    (2) Increasing the basic fee for a coal exploration permit 
application from $2,000.00 to $2,500.00;
    (3) Increasing the basic fee for a permit renewal application from 
$1,000.00 to $2,500.00;
    (4) Increasing the basic fee for a permit transfer application from 
$200.00 to $500.00;
    (5) Adding an annual acreage fee for expired permits of $15.00, per 
acre, to be paid by December 31st of each year on each acre covered by 
a performance bond as of October 1st of the year; and
    (6) Adding the inspection of permits to the ASMC's uses for the 
deposited permit fees.
    Alabama fully funds its share of costs to regulate the coal mining 
industry with fees paid by the coal industry. The proposed fee 
revisions are intended to provide adequate funding to pay the

[[Page 43973]]

State's cost of operating its regulatory program. The ASMC does not 
expect the increase in permit fees to exceed the actual or anticipated 
cost of reviewing, administering, inspecting, and enforcing surface 
coal mining permits in Alabama.
    We find that Alabama's fee changes are consistent with the 
discretionary authority provided by the Federal regulation at 30 CFR 
777.17. Therefore, we are approving Alabama's revision.

IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments

Public Comments

    We asked for public comments on the amendment. As noted in section 
II, we received four comments (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-03). 
The four commenters provided comments that were outside the scope of 
the proposed amendment and not germane to the topic of surface coal 
mining in general. We are not addressing these comments in this final 
rule for these reasons. The full texts of these comments are available 
at www.regulations.gov.

Federal Agency Comments

    On August 21, 2017, pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and Section 
503(b) of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various 
Federal agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Alabama 
program (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02). We did not receive any 
comments.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments

    Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written 
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that 
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of 
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Alabama proposed to 
make in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. 
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on 
August 21, 2017, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments 
from the EPA on the amendment (Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02). 
The EPA did not respond to our request.

State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council 
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)

    Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from 
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic 
properties. On August 21, 2017, we requested comments on the amendment 
(Administrative Record No. AL-0672-02). We did not receive any 
comments.

V. OSMRE's Decision

    Based on the above findings, we are approving the Alabama amendment 
that was submitted on August 14, 2017 (Administrative Record No. AL-
0672).
    To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations 
at 30 CFR part 901 that codify decisions concerning the Alabama 
program. In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, this rule 
will take effect 30 days after the date of publication. Section 503(a) 
of SMCRA requires that the State's program demonstrate the State has 
the capability of carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting 
its purposes. SMCRA requires consistency of State and Federal 
standards.

VI. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12630--Takings

    This rulemaking does not have takings implications. This 
determination is based on the analysis performed for the counterpart 
Federal regulation.

Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    Pursuant to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance dated 
October 12, 1993, the approval of state program amendments is exempted 
from OMB review under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform

    The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required 
by Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988. The Department has determined 
that this Federal Register document meets the criteria of Section 3 of 
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency 
review its legislation and regulations to minimize litigation; and that 
the agency's legislation and regulations provide a clear legal standard 
for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and promote 
simplification and burden reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on the 
quality of Federal legislation and regulations, the Department limited 
its review under this Executive Order to the quality of this Federal 
Register document and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review 
under this Executive Order did not extend to the language of the State 
regulatory program or to the program amendment that the State of 
Alabama drafted.

Executive Order 13132--Federalism

    This rule is not a ``[p]olicy that [has] Federalism implications'' 
as defined by Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132 because it does not 
have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' 
Instead, this rule approves an amendment to the Alabama program 
submitted and drafted by that State. OSMRE reviewed the submission with 
fundamental federalism principles in mind as set forth in Section 2 and 
3 of the Executive Order and with the principles of cooperative 
federalism as set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C. 1201(f). As 
such, pursuant to Section 503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and 
(7)), OSMRE reviewed the program amendment to ensure that it is ``in 
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA and ``consistent with'' the 
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.

Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the 
potential effects of this rulemaking on Federally-recognized Tribes and 
have determined that the rulemaking does not have substantial direct 
effects on one or more Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
government and Tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Tribes. The basis 
for this determination is that our decision is on a State regulatory 
program and does not involve Federal regulations involving Indian 
lands.

Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the 
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy

    Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001, requires agencies to prepare 
a Statement of Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered 
significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a 
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of 
energy. Because this rulemaking is exempt from review under Executive 
Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on 
the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a Statement of Energy 
Effects is not required.

National Environmental Policy Act

    This rulemaking does not require an environmental impact statement 
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that 
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not 
constitute

[[Page 43974]]

major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rulemaking does not contain information collection 
requirements that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of the Interior certifies that this rulemaking will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based 
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rulemaking 
would have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon 
the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rulemaking is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rulemaking: 
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) 
Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, 
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or 
geographic regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects 
on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or 
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based 
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State 
submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based upon 
counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and 
a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a 
major rule.

Unfunded Mandates

    This rulemaking will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, 
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or 
more in any given year. This determination is based upon the fact that 
the State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based 
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared 
and a determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an 
unfunded mandate.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 901

    Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

    Dated: August 16, 2018.
Alfred L. Clayborne,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 901 is amended 
as set forth below:

PART 901--ALABAMA

0
1. The authority citation for part 901 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.


0
2. Section 901.15 is amended in the table by adding an entry for 
``Alabama Administrative Code 880-X-8B-.07'' in chronological order by 
``Date of final publication'' to read as follows:


Sec.  901.15  Approval of Alabama regulatory program amendments.

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Original amendment submission      Date of final         Citation/
              date                    publication         description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
August 14, 2017.................  August 29, 2018...  Alabama
                                                       Administrative
                                                       Code 880-X-8B-
                                                       .07.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-18716 Filed 8-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 43973

State’s cost of operating its regulatory (Administrative Record No. AL–0672– Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132
program. The ASMC does not expect the 02). We did not receive any comments. because it does not have ‘‘substantial
increase in permit fees to exceed the direct effects on the States, on the
V. OSMRE’s Decision
actual or anticipated cost of reviewing, relationship between the national
administering, inspecting, and enforcing Based on the above findings, we are government and the States, or on the
surface coal mining permits in Alabama. approving the Alabama amendment that distribution of power and
We find that Alabama’s fee changes was submitted on August 14, 2017 responsibilities among the various
are consistent with the discretionary (Administrative Record No. AL–0672). levels of government.’’ Instead, this rule
authority provided by the Federal To implement this decision, we are approves an amendment to the Alabama
regulation at 30 CFR 777.17. Therefore, amending the Federal regulations at 30 program submitted and drafted by that
we are approving Alabama’s revision. CFR part 901 that codify decisions State. OSMRE reviewed the submission
concerning the Alabama program. In with fundamental federalism principles
IV. Summary and Disposition of accordance with the Administrative in mind as set forth in Section 2 and 3
Comments Procedure Act, this rule will take effect of the Executive Order and with the
Public Comments 30 days after the date of publication. principles of cooperative federalism as
Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C.
We asked for public comments on the the State’s program demonstrate the 1201(f). As such, pursuant to Section
amendment. As noted in section II, we State has the capability of carrying out 503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
received four comments (Administrative the provisions of the Act and meeting its and (7)), OSMRE reviewed the program
Record No. AL–0672–03). The four purposes. SMCRA requires consistency amendment to ensure that it is ‘‘in
commenters provided comments that of State and Federal standards. accordance with’’ the requirements of
were outside the scope of the proposed SMCRA and ‘‘consistent with’’ the
amendment and not germane to the VI. Procedural Determinations
regulations issued by the Secretary
topic of surface coal mining in general. Executive Order 12630—Takings pursuant to SMCRA.
We are not addressing these comments This rulemaking does not have
in this final rule for these reasons. The Executive Order 13175—Consultation
takings implications. This and Coordination With Indian Tribal
full texts of these comments are determination is based on the analysis
available at www.regulations.gov. Governments
performed for the counterpart Federal
Federal Agency Comments regulation. In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
On August 21, 2017, pursuant to 30 Executive Order 12866—Regulatory effects of this rulemaking on Federally-
CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and Section 503(b) Planning and Review recognized Tribes and have determined
of SMCRA, we requested comments on Pursuant to Office of Management and that the rulemaking does not have
the amendment from various Federal Budget (OMB) Guidance dated October substantial direct effects on one or more
agencies with an actual or potential 12, 1993, the approval of state program Tribes, on the relationship between the
interest in the Alabama program amendments is exempted from OMB Federal government and Tribes, or on
(Administrative Record No. AL–0672– review under Executive Order 12866. the distribution of power and
02). We did not receive any comments. responsibilities between the Federal
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Government and Tribes. The basis for
Reform
Concurrence and Comments this determination is that our decision
The Department of the Interior has is on a State regulatory program and
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we reviewed this rule as required by does not involve Federal regulations
are required to get a written concurrence Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988. involving Indian lands.
from EPA for those provisions of the The Department has determined that
program amendment that relate to air or this Federal Register document meets Executive Order 13211—Regulations
water quality standards issued under the criteria of Section 3 of Executive That Significantly Affect the Supply,
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 Order 12988, which is intended to Distribution, or Use of Energy
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act ensure that the agency review its Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the legislation and regulations to minimize 2001, requires agencies to prepare a
revisions that Alabama proposed to litigation; and that the agency’s Statement of Energy Effects for a
make in this amendment pertain to air legislation and regulations provide a rulemaking that is (1) considered
or water quality standards. Therefore, clear legal standard for affected conduct significant under Executive Order
we did not ask EPA to concur on the rather than a general standard, and 12866, and (2) likely to have a
amendment. However, on August 21, promote simplification and burden significant adverse effect on the supply,
2017, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on distribution, or use of energy. Because
requested comments from the EPA on the quality of Federal legislation and this rulemaking is exempt from review
the amendment (Administrative Record regulations, the Department limited its under Executive Order 12866 and is not
No. AL–0672–02). The EPA did not review under this Executive Order to expected to have a significant adverse
respond to our request. the quality of this Federal Register effect on the supply, distribution, or use
State Historical Preservation Officer document and to changes to the Federal of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on regulations. The review under this is not required.
Historic Preservation (ACHP) Executive Order did not extend to the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

National Environmental Policy Act
language of the State regulatory program
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are or to the program amendment that the This rulemaking does not require an
required to request comments from the State of Alabama drafted. environmental impact statement
SHPO and ACHP on amendments that because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
may have an effect on historic Executive Order 13132—Federalism U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
properties. On August 21, 2017, we This rule is not a ‘‘[p]olicy that [has] decisions on proposed State regulatory
requested comments on the amendment Federalism implications’’ as defined by program provisions do not constitute

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:05 Aug 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1

43974 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

major Federal actions within the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement the fact that the State submittal, which
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the Fairness Act is the subject of this rulemaking, is
National Environmental Policy Act (42 based upon counterpart Federal
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). This rulemaking is not a major rule regulations for which an analysis was
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small prepared and a determination made that
Paperwork Reduction Act Business Regulatory Enforcement the Federal regulation did not impose
Fairness Act. This rulemaking: (a) Does an unfunded mandate.
This rulemaking does not contain not have an annual effect on the
information collection requirements that economy of $100 million; (b) Will not List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 901
require approval by OMB under the cause a major increase in costs or prices Intergovernmental relations, Surface
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. for consumers, individual industries, mining, Underground mining.
3507 et seq.). Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and (c) Dated: August 16, 2018.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Alfred L. Clayborne,
Does not have significant adverse effects
The Department of the Interior on competition, employment, Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
certifies that this rulemaking will not investment, productivity, innovation, or For the reasons set out in the
have a significant economic impact on the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to preamble, 30 CFR part 901 is amended
a substantial number of small entities compete with foreign-based enterprises. as set forth below:
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 This determination is based upon the
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal, fact that the State submittal, which is PART 901—ALABAMA
which is the subject of this rulemaking, the subject of this rulemaking, is based
is based upon counterpart Federal upon counterpart Federal regulations for ■ 1. The authority citation for part 901
regulations for which an economic which an analysis was prepared and a continues to read as follows:
analysis was prepared and certification determination made that the Federal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
made that such regulations would not regulation was not considered a major ■ 2. Section 901.15 is amended in the
have a significant economic effect upon rule. table by adding an entry for ‘‘Alabama
a substantial number of small entities. Unfunded Mandates Administrative Code 880–X–8B–.07’’ in
In making the determination as to chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
whether this rulemaking would have a This rulemaking will not impose an publication’’ to read as follows:
significant economic impact, the unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Department relied upon the data and tribal governments or the private sector § 901.15 Approval of Alabama regulatory
assumptions for the counterpart Federal of $100 million or more in any given program amendments.
regulations. year. This determination is based upon * * * * *

Original amendment submission date Date of final publication Citation/description

* * * * * * *
August 14, 2017 ..................................... August 29, 2018 ..................................... Alabama Administrative Code 880–X–8B–.07.

[FR Doc. 2018–18716 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am] proposed revisions to its program to I. Background on the Alabama Program
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P allow the Alabama Surface Mining
Commission (ASMC) to revise its Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
current permit fee collection procedures State to assume primacy for the
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR from the term of the mine permit to regulation of surface coal mining and
enable the collection of permit fees over reclamation operations on non-Federal
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation the entire life of the mine. The revision and non-Indian lands within its borders
and Enforcement also defines the life of the mine to be by demonstrating that its program
from the issuance of the permit through includes, among other things, State laws
30 CFR Part 901 the full release of the performance bond. and regulations that govern surface coal
[SATS No. AL–081–FOR; Docket ID: OSM– mining and reclamation operations in
DATES: The effective date is September accordance with the requirements of the
2017–0006; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
28, 2018. Act and consistent with the Federal
189S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 18XS501520] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
William Joseph, Acting Director, and (7). On the basis of these criteria,
Alabama Regulatory Program Birmingham Field Office, Office of the Secretary of the Interior
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Surface Mining Reclamation and conditionally approved the Alabama
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite program effective May 20, 1982. You
ACTION: Final rule; approval of 215, Homewood, Alabama 35209. can find background information on the
amendment. Telephone: (205) 290–7282. Email: Alabama program, including the
bjoseph@osmre.gov. Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
comments, and the conditions of
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement approval of the Alabama program in the
I. Background on the Alabama Program
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment II. Submission of the Amendment
May 20, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
to the Alabama regulatory program III. OSMRE’s Findings 22030). You can also find later actions
(Alabama program) under the Surface IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments concerning the Alabama program and
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of V. OSMRE’s Decision program amendments at 30 CFR 901.10,
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Alabama VI. Procedural Determinations 901.15, and 901.16.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:05 Aug 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1

Document Created: 2018-08-29 00:14:00
Document Modified: 2018-08-29 00:14:00

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule; approval of amendment.
Dates		The effective date is September 28, 2018.
Contact		William Joseph, Acting Director, Birmingham Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood, Alabama 35209. Telephone: (205) 290-7282. Email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 43972
CFR Associated		Intergovernmental Relations; Surface Mining and Underground Mining

83 FR 43972 - Alabama Regulatory Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOROffice of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 168 (August 29, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement