83_FR_44195 83 FR 44027 - Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Amendment to Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Second Amended Final Determination and Amendment to Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of the Antidumping Duty Investigation

83 FR 44027 - Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Amendment to Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Second Amended Final Determination and Amendment to Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of the Antidumping Duty Investigation

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 168 (August 29, 2018)

Page Range44027-44028
FR Document2018-18725

On August 15, 2018, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) amended its July 3, 2018, final judgment in Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United States, which sustained, in part, the final results of remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the less- than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation on multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China (China). On July 25, 2018, Commerce notified the public that the CIT's July 3, 2018, final judgment in the case was not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in the LTFV investigation of MLWF from China, and, pursuant to the CIT's July 3, 2018, final judgment, Commerce issued an amended final determination excluding Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Dunhua City Jisen), Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited (Fine Furniture), and Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. (Armstrong Wood) from the antidumping duty (AD) order. Pursuant to the CIT's August 15, 2018, amendment to its July 3, 2018, final judgment, we are excluding Double F Limited from the AD order.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2018) 
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44027-44028]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Amendment to Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Second 
Amended Final Determination and Amendment to Notice of Third Amended 
Final Determination of the Antidumping Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On August 15, 2018, the United States Court of International 
Trade (CIT or Court) amended its July 3, 2018, final judgment in 
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United States, which sustained, 
in part, the final results of remand redetermination pursuant to court 
order by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation on multilayered wood flooring 
(MLWF) from the People's Republic of China (China). On July 25, 2018, 
Commerce notified the public that the CIT's July 3, 2018, final 
judgment in the case was not in harmony with Commerce's final 
determination in the LTFV investigation of MLWF from China, and, 
pursuant to the CIT's July 3, 2018, final judgment, Commerce issued an 
amended final determination excluding Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry 
Co., Ltd. (Dunhua City Jisen), Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited (Fine 
Furniture), and Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. (Armstrong 
Wood) from the antidumping duty (AD) order. Pursuant to the CIT's 
August 15, 2018, amendment to its July 3, 2018, final

[[Page 44028]]

judgment, we are excluding Double F Limited from the AD order.

DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As explained in further detail in the Notice of Court Decision and 
Notice of Third Amended Final Determination,\1\ on July 3, 2018, the 
CIT sustained, in part, Commerce's fifth remand redetermination.\2\ In 
particular, the CIT sustained Commerce's determination not to terminate 
the AD order \3\ because the order was imposed, in part, based on 
indirect evidence of dumping by the China-wide entity, a finding which 
was not challenged.\4\ With respect to the separate rate plaintiffs, 
the CIT ordered exclusion from the order for three separate respondents 
that sought voluntary examination in the investigation, but were 
denied: Dunhua City Jisen, Fine Furniture, and Armstrong Wood. The CIT 
held that Commerce's application of the exclusion regulation, 19 CFR 
351.204(e)(1), was arbitrary with respect to these respondents.\5\ The 
CIT sustained Commerce's determination not to exclude the remaining 
separate rate plaintiffs that did not seek voluntary examination in the 
investigation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Notice 
of Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Second Amended Final 
Determination and Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of the 
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 83 FR 35217 (July 25, 2018) (Notice 
of Court Decision and Notice of Third Amended Final Determination). 
See also Baroque Timber Indus. (Zhongshan) Co. v. United States, 971 
F. Supp. 2d 1333, 1336 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014); Final Results of 
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Baroque Timber Industries 
(Zhongshan) Company, Limited, et al. v. United States, dated 
November 14, 2013 (First Remand Redetermination); Final Results of 
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Baroque Timber Industries 
(Zhongshan) Company, Limited, et al. v. United States, dated May 30, 
2014 (Second Remand Redetermination); Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. 
United States, 77 F. Supp. 3d 1351 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2015); Changzhou 
Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States, 848 F.3d 1006, 1008 (Fed. Cir. 
2017); Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, 
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, dated 
October 16, 2014 (Third Remand Redetermination); Final Results of 
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Changzhou Hawd Flooring 
Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, dated March 24, 2015 (Fourth 
Remand Redetermination); Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 
to Court Order, Court No. 12-00020, dated February 25, 2017 (Fifth 
Remand Redetermination).
    \2\ See Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United States, 
Ct. No. 12-20, Slip Op. 18-82 (Ct. Int'l Trade July 3, 2018).
    \3\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 
and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 (December 8, 2011) (First 
Amended Final Determination and Order).
    \4\ See Slip Op. 18-82 at 11-12.
    \5\ Id. at 16.
    \6\ Id. at 15-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the CIT's July 3, 2018, final judgment, on July 25, 
2018, Commerce issued the Notice of Court Decision and Notice of Third 
Amended Final Determination, which explained that the CIT's July 3, 
2018, final judgment was a final decision of that court that is not in 
harmony with the Second Amended Final Determination, and excluded 
Dunhua City Jisen, Fine Furniture, and Armstrong Wood from the AD 
order.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice of Court Decision and Notice of Third Amended 
Final Determination, 83 FR at 35219.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 15, 2018, in response to an unopposed motion filed by 
Fine Furniture, the CIT amended its July 3, 2018, final judgment, and 
ordered the exclusion of Fine Furniture's affiliate, Double F Limited, 
a party previously collapsed with Fine Furniture into a single 
entity,\8\ from the AD order.\9\ This notice is published in accordance 
with the CIT's August 15, 2018, order, and amends Commerce's July 25, 
2018, Notice of Court Decision and Notice of Third Amended Final 
Determination to exclude Double F Limited, along with Fine Furniture, 
Donghua City Jisen, and Armstrong Wood.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2011-2012, 79 FR 26712 (May 9, 2014); unchanged in Multilayered Wood 
Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 35314 (June 20, 2014).
    \9\ See Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United States, 
Ct. No. 12-20, Dkt. No. 199 (Ct. Int'l Trade Aug. 15 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment to Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\10\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\11\ the United States Court for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) 
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision 
that is not ``in harmony'' with Commerce's determination and must 
suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. 
The CIT's August 15, 2018, amendment to its July 3, 2018, final 
judgment ordering the exclusion of Double F Limited constitutes a final 
decision of that court that is not in harmony with the Second Amended 
Final Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the 
publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \11\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment to Third Amended Final Determination

    Pursuant to the CIT's August 15, 2018, order, we are amending the 
Notice of Court Decision and Notice of Third Amended Final 
Determination to exclude Double F Limited from the AD order. Section 
735(c)(2)(A)-(B) of the Act instructs Commerce to terminate suspension 
of liquidation and to release any bond or other security, and refund 
any cash deposit, in the event of a negative determination. Here, 
suspension of liquidation must continue during the pendency of the 
appeals process (in accordance with Timken and as discussed above), 
and, therefore, we will continue to instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) at this time to (A) continue suspension at a cash 
deposit rate of zero percent until instructed otherwise; and (B) 
release any bond or other security, and refund any cash deposit made 
pursuant to the order by Double F Limited. In the event that the CIT's 
ruling is not appealed, or appealed and upheld by the CAFC, Commerce 
will instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to 
liquidate those unliquidated entries of subject merchandise without 
regard to antidumping duties.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 735, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 24, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-18725 Filed 8-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Notices 44027 DFA’s amendment of its Export Trade 41. Valley Fig Growers, Fresno, CA show for which the application is being Certificate of Review results in the Dated: August 22, 2018. submitted. In addition, should following membership list: Joseph Flynn, applications not be received at least 180 1. Alpine Pacific Nut Company, days prior to the start date of the show, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, Hughson, CA International Trade Administration. the TFC program will allow for a grace 2. Andersen & Sons Shelling, Vina, CA period of 5 business days to receive the [FR Doc. 2018–18686 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am] 3. Avanti Nut Company, Inc., Stockton, application. CA BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P This change is reflected on the 4. Berberian Nut Company, LLC, Chico, website at: https://2016.export.gov/ CA tradefairs/eg_main_018559.asp and 5. Carriere Family Farms, Inc., Glenn, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE https://2016.export.gov/tradefairs/eg_ CA main_018559.asp. International Trade Administration 6. California Almond Packers and Exporters, Inc. (CAPEX), Corning [Docket No.: 180806732–8732–01] William Ross, CA Supervisory International Trade Specialist/ 7. California Walnut Company, Inc., Los Trade Fair Certification (TFC) Program: Team Leader, Office of Trade Promotion Molinos, CA Notice of Change of Application Programs. 8. Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA Deadline and Mailing Address [FR Doc. 2018–18617 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am] 9. Continente Nut LLC, Oakley, CA BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P AGENCY: International Trade 10. C. R. Crain & Sons, Inc., Los Administration, Department of Molinos, CA 11. Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc., Los Commerce. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Molinos, CA ACTION: Notice of change of application 12. Diamond Foods, LLC, Stockton, CA deadline and mailing address. International Trade Administration 13. Empire Nut Company, Colusa, CA SUMMARY: The United States Department 14. Fig Garden Packing, Inc., Fresno, CA [A–570–970] 15. Gold River Orchards, Inc., Escalon, of Commerce, International Trade CA Administration, is updating the Trade Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 16. Grower Direct Nut Company, Fair Certification (TFC) program People’s Republic of China: Hughson, CA established under 22 U.S.C. 2455(f) to Amendment to Notice of Court 17. Guerra Nut Shelling Company, revise the application mailing address Decision Not in Harmony With the Hollister, CA and the deadline for application Second Amended Final Determination 18. Hill View Packing Company Inc., submission for the Program. The and Amendment to Notice of Third Gustine, CA updated TFC program guidelines can be Amended Final Determination of the 19. John B. SanFilippo & Son, Inc. found at: https://2016.export.gov/ Antidumping Duty Investigation 20. Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA tradefairs/eg_main_018560.asp. 21. Mariani Packing Company, Inc., DATES: Applicable on August 29, 2018. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Vacaville, CA ADDRESSES: Applications for TFC International Trade Administration, 22. Mid Valley Nut Company Inc., consideration should be mailed via Department of Commerce. Hughson, CA preferred courier method to: Vidya SUMMARY: On August 15, 2018, the 23. Morada Nut Company, LP, Stockton, Desai, Trade Fair Certification, 1401 United States Court of International CA Constitution Avenue NW, Mailstop Trade (CIT or Court) amended its July 3, 24. National Raisin Company, Fowler, 52024, Washington, DC 20230, Phone: 2018, final judgment in Changzhou CA 202–482–2311. Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United 25. O–G Nut Company, Stockton, CA To ensure timely delivery of your States, which sustained, in part, the 26. Omega Walnut, Inc., Orland, CA application, please also email your final results of remand redetermination 27. Pearl Crop, Inc., Stockton, CA application to: TFC@trade.gov. pursuant to court order by the 28. Poindexter Nut Company, Selma, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department of Commerce (Commerce) CA Vidya Desai, Senior Advisor, Trade pertaining to the less-than-fair-value 29. Prima Noce Packing, Linden, CA 30. RPC Packing Inc., Porterville, CA Events, Office of Trade Promotion (LTFV) investigation on multilayered 31. Sacramento Packing, Inc., Yuba City, Programs, U.S. Department of wood flooring (MLWF) from the CA Commerce, TFC@trade.gov. People’s Republic of China (China). On 32. Sacramento Valley Walnut Growers, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: July 25, 2018, Commerce notified the Inc., Yuba City, CA New Mailing Address: The Office of public that the CIT’s July 3, 2018, final 33. San Joaquin Figs, Inc., Fresno, CA Trade Promotion Programs, which judgment in the case was not in 34. Shoei Foods USA Inc., Olivehurst, administers the TFC program for the harmony with Commerce’s final CA U.S. Department of Commerce, has determination in the LTFV investigation 35. Stapleton-Spence Packing, Gridley, moved its physical office location from of MLWF from China, and, pursuant to CA the Ronald Reagan Building to the main the CIT’s July 3, 2018, final judgment, 36. Sun-Maid Growers of California, Herbert C. Hoover Commerce Building Commerce issued an amended final Kingsburg, CA located at 1401 Constitution Ave. NW. determination excluding Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Dunhua sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 37. Sunsweet Growers Inc., Yuba City, This change is reflected on the website CA at: https://2016.export.gov/tradefairs/ City Jisen), Fine Furniture (Shanghai) 38. Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc., Yuba eg_main_018561.asp. Limited (Fine Furniture), and City, CA Revised Application Deadline: The Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) 39. T.M. Duche Nut Company, Inc., TFC program is revising the deadline for Co., Ltd. (Armstrong Wood) from the Orland, CA applying for certification from 270 days antidumping duty (AD) order. Pursuant 40. Wilbur Packing Company, Inc., Live prior to the start date of the show to 180 to the CIT’s August 15, 2018, Oak, CA days prior to the start date of the trade amendment to its July 3, 2018, final VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Aug 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM 29AUN1

44028 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2018 / Notices judgment, we are excluding Double F Commerce’s application of the 3, 2018, final judgment ordering the Limited from the AD order. exclusion regulation, 19 CFR exclusion of Double F Limited DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018. 351.204(e)(1), was arbitrary with respect constitutes a final decision of that court FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to these respondents.5 The CIT that is not in harmony with the Second Aleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, sustained Commerce’s determination Amended Final Determination. This Enforcement and Compliance, not to exclude the remaining separate notice is published in fulfillment of the International Trade Administration, rate plaintiffs that did not seek publication requirements of Timken. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 voluntary examination in the investigation.6 Amendment to Third Amended Final Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Determination Pursuant to the CIT’s July 3, 2018, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3147. final judgment, on July 25, 2018, Pursuant to the CIT’s August 15, 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commerce issued the Notice of Court order, we are amending the Notice of Background Decision and Notice of Third Amended Court Decision and Notice of Third Final Determination, which explained Amended Final Determination to As explained in further detail in the that the CIT’s July 3, 2018, final Notice of Court Decision and Notice of exclude Double F Limited from the AD judgment was a final decision of that order. Section 735(c)(2)(A)–(B) of the Third Amended Final Determination,1 court that is not in harmony with the on July 3, 2018, the CIT sustained, in Act instructs Commerce to terminate Second Amended Final Determination, part, Commerce’s fifth remand suspension of liquidation and to release and excluded Dunhua City Jisen, Fine redetermination.2 In particular, the CIT any bond or other security, and refund Furniture, and Armstrong Wood from sustained Commerce’s determination any cash deposit, in the event of a the AD order.7 not to terminate the AD order 3 because On August 15, 2018, in response to an negative determination. Here, the order was imposed, in part, based on unopposed motion filed by Fine suspension of liquidation must continue indirect evidence of dumping by the Furniture, the CIT amended its July 3, during the pendency of the appeals China-wide entity, a finding which was 2018, final judgment, and ordered the process (in accordance with Timken and not challenged.4 With respect to the exclusion of Fine Furniture’s affiliate, as discussed above), and, therefore, we separate rate plaintiffs, the CIT ordered Double F Limited, a party previously will continue to instruct U.S. Customs exclusion from the order for three collapsed with Fine Furniture into a and Border Protection (CBP) at this time separate respondents that sought single entity,8 from the AD order.9 This to (A) continue suspension at a cash voluntary examination in the notice is published in accordance with deposit rate of zero percent until investigation, but were denied: Dunhua the CIT’s August 15, 2018, order, and instructed otherwise; and (B) release City Jisen, Fine Furniture, and amends Commerce’s July 25, 2018, any bond or other security, and refund Armstrong Wood. The CIT held that Notice of Court Decision and Notice of any cash deposit made pursuant to the Third Amended Final Determination to order by Double F Limited. In the event 1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the exclude Double F Limited, along with that the CIT’s ruling is not appealed, or People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Fine Furniture, Donghua City Jisen, and appealed and upheld by the CAFC, Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Notice of Court Commerce will instruct CBP to Decision Not in Harmony with the Second Armstrong Wood. Amended Final Determination and Notice of Third terminate the suspension of liquidation Amended Final Determination of the Antidumping Amendment to Timken Notice and to liquidate those unliquidated Duty Investigation, 83 FR 35217 (July 25, 2018) In its decision in Timken,10 as entries of subject merchandise without (Notice of Court Decision and Notice of Third regard to antidumping duties. Amended Final Determination). See also Baroque clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the Timber Indus. (Zhongshan) Co. v. United States, United States Court for the Federal This notice is issued and published in 971 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014); Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 735, and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Company, Limited, et al. v. United States, dated 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce Dated: August 24, 2018. November 14, 2013 (First Remand must publish a notice of a court Redetermination); Final Results of Redetermination Gary Taverman, decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with Pursuant to Court Order, Baroque Timber Industries Commerce’s determination and must Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping (Zhongshan) Company, Limited, et al. v. United and Countervailing Duty Operations, States, dated May 30, 2014 (Second Remand suspend liquidation of entries pending performing the non-exclusive functions and Redetermination); Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s duties of the Assistant Secretary for United States, 77 F. Supp. 3d 1351 (Ct. Int’l Trade August 15, 2018, amendment to its July Enforcement and Compliance. 2015); Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States, 848 F.3d 1006, 1008 (Fed. Cir. 2017); Final [FR Doc. 2018–18725 Filed 8–28–18; 8:45 am] 5 Id. at 16. Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 6 Id. at 15–16. Order, Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd., et al. v. 7 See Notice of Court Decision and Notice of United States, dated October 16, 2014 (Third Remand Redetermination); Final Results of Third Amended Final Determination, 83 FR at Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, 35219. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd., et al. v. United 8 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the States, dated March 24, 2015 (Fourth Remand People’s Republic of China: Final Results of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Redetermination); Final Results of Redetermination Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– Administration Pursuant to Court Order, Court No. 12–00020, dated 2012, 79 FR 26712 (May 9, 2014); unchanged in February 25, 2017 (Fifth Remand Redetermination). Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 2 See Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Science Advisory Board; Solicitation sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES United States, Ct. No. 12–20, Slip Op. 18–82 (Ct. Antidumping Duty Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 35314 for Members of the NOAA Science Int’l Trade July 3, 2018). (June 20, 2014). Advisory Board 3 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 9 See Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. People’s Republic of China: Amended Final United States, Ct. No. 12–20, Dkt. No. 199 (Ct. Int’l AGENCY: National Oceanic and Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Trade Aug. 15 2018). Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 (December 10 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 8, 2011) (First Amended Final Determination and (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Order). 11 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. Research (OAR), Department of 4 See Slip Op. 18–82 at 11–12. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010). Commerce (DOC). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Aug 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM 29AUN1


Document Created: 2018-08-29 00:13:53
Document Modified: 2018-08-29 00:13:53
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable July 13, 2018.
ContactAleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147.
FR Citation83 FR 44027 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR