83 FR 46104 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 177 (September 12, 2018)
Food and Drug Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 177 (September 12, 2018)
| Page Range | 46104-46107 | |
| FR Document | 2018-19855 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 12, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 46104-46107] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-19855] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 110 [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0920] Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk- Based Preventive Controls for Human Food AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Final rule; partial withdrawal. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is removing instruction 13 from the Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food (Preventive Controls for Human Food) regulation. Instruction 13 directs the Federal Register to remove and reserve as of September 17, 2018, the Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding Human Food (Human Food CGMP) regulation. Removal of instruction 13 is necessary because the compliance dates for certain facilities subject to the modernized current good manufacturing practice requirements in the Preventive Controls for Human Food regulation have been extended. Retaining the Human Food CGMP regulation will maintain the status quo while these facilities prepare for compliance with the new CGMP requirements and will avoid an unintended gap in public health protection. DATES: Effective September 12, 2018, FDA withdraws amendatory instruction 13 on page 56144 of the final rule published at 80 FR 55908 at 56144 on September 17, 2015. Submit either electronic or written comments by October 12, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments must be submitted on or before October 12, 2018. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until midnight Eastern Time at the end of October 12, 2018. Comments received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service acceptance receipt is on or before that date. Electronic Submissions Submit electronic comments in the following way:Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov. If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions''). Written/Paper Submissions Submit written/paper submissions as follows: Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.'' Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0920 for ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your [[Page 46105]] comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Scott, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2166. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background and Discussion II. Legal Authority III. Analysis of Environmental Impact IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 I. Background and Discussion In the Federal Register of September 17, 2015, FDA published the final rule, ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food'' (80 FR 55908; the ``rule establishing part 117''). Among other things, in the final rule establishing part 117 (21 CFR part 117), we modernized and placed in part 117, subpart B the longstanding current good manufacturing practice requirements (CGMPs) codified in part 110 (21 CFR part 110). We staggered the compliance dates for part 117 based on business size. We also instructed the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110 effective September 17, 2018, the latest of the staggered compliance dates, which we treated as a conforming amendment (see instruction number 13 at 80 FR 55908 at 56144). Subsequently, in a final rule published in the Federal Register of August 24, 2016 (81 FR 57784; the ``compliance date final rule''), among other things, we extended by up to 16 months the part 117 compliance dates for certain facilities, to address concerns about the practicality of compliance, consider changes to the regulatory text, and better align compliance dates across various rules. The compliance date final rule extended the part 117 compliance dates for the following establishments, as set out in table 1: Table 1--Facilities That Received Extended Part 117 Compliance Dates ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Compliance date Compliance date with extension as announced in final announced in rule establishing compliance date part 117 final rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Facility solely engaged in packing and/or holding activities on produce RACs, that is: a very small September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020. business. a small business... September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019. not a small or very September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018. small business. Facility that would qualify as a secondary activities farm except for ownership of the facility, that is: a very small September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020. business. a small business... September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019. not a small or very September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018. small business. Facilities that would qualify as a farm if it did not color RACs, that is: a very small business....... September 17, 2018 January 27, 2020. a small business............ September 18, 2017 January 28, 2019. not a small or very small September 19, 2016 January 26, 2018. business. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A small business is a business (including any subsidiaries and affiliates) employing fewer than 500 full-time equivalent employees. A very small business is a business (including any subsidiaries and affiliates) averaging less than $1 million, adjusted for inflation, per year, during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year in sales of human food plus the market value of human food manufactured, processed, packed or held without sale (e.g., held for a fee). (See Sec. 117.3.) After issuing the compliance date final rule, FDA announced that as a matter of enforcement policy it did not intend to enforce certain part 117 requirements for certain facilities, including some of the facilities in table 1 whose compliance dates had been extended by the compliance date final rule. See the January 2018 guidance entitled ``Policy Regarding Certain Entities Subject to the Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Preventive Controls, Produce Safety, and/or Foreign Supplier Verification Programs'' (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/ucm590661.pdf). The present rulemaking does not change the policies contained in this guidance. As mentioned above, in the final rule establishing part 117 we instructed the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110, effective September 17, 2018, which at the time was the latest of the staggered compliance dates. The goal was to have firms subject to the Human Food CGMP regulation until the Preventive Controls for Human Food regulation took its place, leaving no gap in public health protection. However, in the compliance date final rule we extended the compliance dates for part 117 by up to 16 months but failed to [[Page 46106]] revise the previous instruction to remove part 110. Without the current action, the small and very small facilities described in table 1 will not be subject to any CGMPs until, respectively, January 28, 2019, and January 27, 2020. However, FDA's intent always has been that part 110 would remain unchanged and in effect until all establishments have reached the date when they must be in compliance with part 117. Therefore, we are amending the rule establishing part 117 to remove the instruction to the Federal Register to remove and reserve part 110. We intend to remove part 110 in a separate action after all establishments have reached their compliance dates for the part 117 CGMPs. When FDA conducts rulemaking, it normally does so using notice-and- comment procedures established under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and FDA regulations. These procedures allow the public an opportunity to participate in Agency rulemaking by submitting written comments on proposed rules. FDA considers these comments as it finalizes rules. (5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c); Sec. 10.40 (21 CFR 10.40.)) The APA, however, does not require an agency to use notice-and-comment procedures in all rulemaking. For example, the APA provides that Agencies shall not use notice-and-comment procedures, and shall proceed with a final rule, when the Agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public interest, and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).) Likewise, FDA's regulations provide that the requirements of notice and public procedure do not apply when the Commissioner of Food and Drugs determines for good cause that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, in which case, the notice issuing the regulation will state the reasons for the determination, and provide an opportunity for comment to determine whether the regulation should subsequently be modified or revoked. (Sec. 10.40(e)(1).) Pursuant to this regulation, FDA requests comments on the timing for the removal of part 110. In this instance, for several reasons, FDA finds good cause for issuing this final rule without notice and comment. Notice and comment are unnecessary because this final rule is a minor and technical repair of an obvious oversight in the compliance date final rule, maintains the CGMP regulatory status quo for industry, affirms FDA's plan for transitioning from part 110 to part 117 as outlined in the rule establishing part 117, and is not expected to generate public concern. FDA is addressing the gap in CGMP regulatory coverage from September 17, 2018, to January 27, 2020, by issuing a narrowly tailored amendment to remove instruction 13 from the rule to establish part 117. The result of this amendment will be that the part 110 CGMPs will continue in effect for establishments that have not reached their part 117 compliance date. This action will serve to correct an obvious oversight made in the compliance date final rule. FDA does not anticipate public concern with this action. The Agency previously sought public comment on its proposal to remove part 110 in coordination with the compliance dates for part 117 and received no comments that disagreed. The present continuation and planned eventual removal of part 110 is a repeat of what was previously proposed without public objection. Furthermore, it is clear from the rule establishing part 117 that we intended for facilities to remain subject to part 110 until their part 117 compliance date (80 FR 55908 at 56127). Thus, we do not believe there was ever any reasonable expectation on the part of the establishments listed in table 1 that they would not be continuously subject to CGMPs. For these various reasons, we have determined that notice and comment is unnecessary. FDA finds further good cause for issuing this final rule without notice and comment because notice and comment are contrary to the public interest and impracticable. There could be negative public health implications if there were a temporal gap in CGMP coverage; for example, there have been outbreaks associated with the types of facilities still subject to part 110 (e.g., listeria in cantaloupe). Many of the establishments listed in table 1 are not required to comply with the replacement CGMPs in part 117 until January 2019 or January 2020, depending on business size. This means that these establishments would have no applicable CGMP requirements for 4 to 16 months. CGMP requirements have existed for all human food manufacturers since at least 1970 (see 34 FR 6977) and serve as a significant basis for FDA's determination of what constitutes an insanitary food production environment that may result in food that is injurious to public health under section 402(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4)), among other authorities. It would be contrary to the public interest to allow the temporal gap in CGMP coverage. To summarize, a gap in CGMP coverage would leave FDA without a primary tool to execute its function of ensuring that food manufacturing establishments follow basic food safety practices, potentially endangering the public health, in order to provide the public an opportunity to comment on a non-controversial technical matter. For these reasons, we are issuing this amendment to the final rule establishing part 117 without prior notice and comment. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)). In addition, we find good cause for this amendment to the rule establishing part 117 to become effective on the date of publication. The APA allows an effective date less than 30 days after publication as provided by the Agency for good cause found and published within the rule (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). As provided at 80 FR 55908, September 17, 2015, the amendment removing part 110 was to take effect on September 17, 2018. In order to continue part 110 for an interim period, this final rule needs to be effective on or before September 16, 2018, and therefore it is not possible for this rule to take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. As previously described, in order to prevent a gap in CGMP coverage for certain establishments, an immediate effective date is necessary to remove, before September 17, 2018, the instruction to remove and reserve part 110. Further, because the facilities' responsibility to comply with CGMP requirements remains unchanged, this rule places no burden on affected parties for which they would need a reasonable time to prepare. Therefore, the Commissioner finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and Sec. 10.40(c)(4)(ii) for this amendment to become effective on the date of publication. II. Legal Authority We are issuing this final rule removing instruction number 13 of the rule to establish part 117 under the same authority for which the rule containing instruction number 13 was originally issued. That analysis may be found in section II, ``Legal Authority,'' of the rule to establish part 117 (80 FR 55908 at 55917 to 55920). III. Analysis of Environmental Impact FDA has determined that the removal of instruction 13 will not change the status quo and, therefore, is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy [[Page 46107]] Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 110 Food packaging, Foods. 0 Therefore, in FR Rule Doc. No. 2015-21920, published September 17, 2015, at 80 FR 55908-56168, amendatory instruction 13 in the third column on page 56144 is withdrawn. Dated: September 7, 2018. Scott Gottlieb, Commissioner of Food and Drugs. [FR Doc. 2018-19855 Filed 9-11-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
![46104 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Joinus Freight Systems (H.K.) Limited, a.k.a., the For all items subject to the EAR. Presumption of 81 FR 14958, 3/21/16. 83 FR [Insert
following two aliases: (See § 744.11 of the EAR). denial. FR Page Number] 9/4/2018.
–JFS Global Logistics; and.
–Joinus Freight Systems Global Logistics Lim-
ited.
Unit 07–07, 25F, Tower B, Regent Centre, 63 Wo
Yi Hop Road, Kwai Chung, N.T. Hong Kong and
Units 801–803 and 805, Park Sun Building, No.
97–107 Wo Yi Hop Road, Kwai Chung, Hong
Kong.
* * * * * 3. On page 44826, in the table, under
the country heading for Russia, the PJSC
Mikron entry should read as follows:
* * * * *
PJSC Mikron, 1st Zapadniy Proezd 12/1, For all items subject to the EAR. Presumption of 81 FR 61601, 9/7/16. 83 FR [Insert
Zelenograd, Russia, 124460. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). denial. FR Page Number] 9/4/2018.
* * * * * DATES: Effective September 12, 2018, comments, that information will be
[FR Doc. C2–2018–18766 Filed 9–11–18; 8:45 am] FDA withdraws amendatory instruction posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 13 on page 56144 of the final rule • If you want to submit a comment
published at 80 FR 55908 at 56144 on with confidential information that you
September 17, 2015. Submit either do not wish to be made available to the
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND electronic or written comments by public, submit the comment as a
HUMAN SERVICES October 12, 2018. written/paper submission and in the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Food and Drug Administration
as follows. Please note that late, Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
21 CFR Part 110 untimely filed comments will not be Written/Paper Submissions
considered. Electronic comments must
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0920] be submitted on or before October 12, Submit written/paper submissions as
2018. The https://www.regulations.gov follows:
Current Good Manufacturing Practice, electronic filing system will accept
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
comments until midnight Eastern Time
Preventive Controls for Human Food written/paper submissions): Dockets
at the end of October 12, 2018.
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Comments received by mail/hand
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
HHS. delivery/courier (for written/paper
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
ACTION: Final rule; partial withdrawal. submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery • For written/paper comments
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug service acceptance receipt is on or submitted to the Dockets Management
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or before that date. Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
we) is removing instruction 13 from the well as any attachments, except for
Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Electronic Submissions information submitted, marked and
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based identified, as confidential, if submitted
Submit electronic comments in the
Preventive Controls for Human Food as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
following way:
(Preventive Controls for Human Food) Instructions: All submissions received
regulation. Instruction 13 directs the • Federal eRulemaking Portal:
must include the Docket No. FDA–
Federal Register to remove and reserve https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. 2011–N–0920 for ‘‘Current Good
as of September 17, 2018, the Current Manufacturing Practice, Hazard
Good Manufacturing Practice in Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https:// Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive
Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding
www.regulations.gov will be posted to Controls for Human Food.’’ Received
Human Food (Human Food CGMP)
the docket unchanged. Because your comments, those filed in a timely
regulation. Removal of instruction 13 is
comment will be made public, you are manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
necessary because the compliance dates
for certain facilities subject to the solely responsible for ensuring that your in the docket and, except for those
modernized current good manufacturing comment does not include any submitted as ‘‘Confidential
practice requirements in the Preventive confidential information that you or a Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
Controls for Human Food regulation third party may not wish to be posted, https://www.regulations.gov or at the
have been extended. Retaining the such as medical information, your or Dockets Management Staff between 9
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Human Food CGMP regulation will anyone else’s Social Security number, or a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
maintain the status quo while these confidential business information, such Friday.
facilities prepare for compliance with as a manufacturing process. Please note • Confidential Submissions—To
the new CGMP requirements and will that if you include your name, contact submit a comment with confidential
avoid an unintended gap in public information, or other information that information that you do not wish to be
health protection. identifies you in the body of your made publicly available, submit your
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Sep 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM 12SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_46281/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 46107
Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore, EPA is providing notice that it is 15964 and 83 FR 16027, respectively.
neither an environmental assessment updating the delegation of certain NSPS EPA stated in the direct final rule that
nor an environmental impact statement to NMED, and taking final action to if we receive relevant adverse comments
is required. approve the delegation of certain by May 14, 2018, we would publish a
NESHAP to NMED. timely withdrawal in the Federal
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Register, and all public comments
DATES: This rule is effective on October
This final rule contains no collection 12, 2018. received would be addressed in a
of information. Therefore, clearance by ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a subsequent final rule based on the
the Office of Management and Budget docket for this action under Docket ID proposed rule.
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of No. EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0091. All EPA received an adverse comment on
1995 is not required. documents in the docket are listed on May 14, 2018, and accordingly
the http://www.regulations.gov website. withdrew the direct final rule on June
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 110 5, 2018, pursuant to sections 111 and
Although listed in the index, some
Food packaging, Foods. 112 of the CAA. See 83 FR 25936. The
information is not publicly available,
■ Therefore, in FR Rule Doc. No. 2015– comment and our response to that
e.g., Confidential Business Information
21920, published September 17, 2015, at comment follows below.
or other information whose disclosure is
80 FR 55908–56168, amendatory restricted by statute. Certain other II. Response to Comment
instruction 13 in the third column on material, such as copyrighted material,
page 56144 is withdrawn. Comment: EPA received an
is not placed on the internet and will be anonymous adverse comment in
Dated: September 7, 2018. publicly available only in hard copy response to the proposed rulemaking.
Scott Gottlieb, form. Publicly available docket The comment includes several personal
Commissioner of Food and Drugs. materials are available either observations and statements critical of
[FR Doc. 2018–19855 Filed 9–11–18; 8:45 am] electronically through http:// New Mexico’s ability to maintain and
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at oversee its air quality programs. The
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, commenter recommends that the
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. proposed update to New Mexico’s
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. NESHAP delegation not be approved
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY Rick Barrett (6MM–AP), (214) 665–7227; until EPA investigates the commenter’s
email: barrett.richard@epa.gov. allegations and New Mexico has
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: addressed the alleged deficiencies. See
Throughout this document whenever Docket for the entire comment.
[EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0091; FRL–9982– EPA’s Response: We thank the
62—Region 6]
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA. commenter for the comment. Section
New Source Performance Standards 112(l) of the Act and EPA’s
Table of Contents implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation I. Background
63, subpart E primarily govern EPA’s
of Authority to New Mexico II. Response to Comment actions on State requests for delegation
III. What does this action do? of authority to implement and enforce
AGENCY: Environmental Protection IV. What is the authority for delegation? the NESHAP program. CAA section
Agency (EPA). V. What criteria must New Mexico’s 112(l)(5)(B) states that EPA shall
ACTION: Final rule; delegation of programs meet to be approved? disapprove a NESHAP program
VI. How did NMED meet the NSPS and submitted by a State if we find that
authority. NESHAP program approval criteria? adequate resources are not available to
SUMMARY: The New Mexico VII. What is being delegated?
implement the program. See also 40
VIII. What is not being delegated?
Environment Department (NMED) has IX. How will statutory and regulatory CFR 63.91(d)(3)(iii). Several concerns
submitted updated regulations for interpretations be made? expressed by the commenter relate to
receiving delegation and approval of a X. What authority does the EPA have? the adequacy of resources (including the
program for the implementation and XI. What information must NMED provide to lack of technically experienced and
enforcement of certain New Source the EPA? qualified staff) maintained by the NMED
Performance Standards (NSPS) and XII. What is the EPA’s oversight role? Air Quality Bureau. NMED provided
National Emission Standards for XIII. Should sources submit notices to the EPA with a response to those comments
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for EPA or NMED? that included a description of current
XIV. How will unchanged authorities be
all sources (both Title V and non-Title delegated to NMED in the future?
resources and experience within the Air
V sources). These updated regulations XV. Final Action Quality Bureau. See Docket for NMED’s
apply to certain NSPS promulgated by XVI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews response. In addition, consistent with
the EPA and amended between 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), New Mexico’s
September 24, 2013 and January 15, I. Background delegation update request included a
2017; certain NESHAP promulgated by On April 13, 2018, EPA published a reference to its previous demonstration
the EPA and amended between January direct final rule and accompanying and a reaffirmation that the up-front
1, 2011 and January 15, 2017; and other proposal approving the updated approval criteria for delegation are still
NESHAP promulgated by the EPA and delegation of authority for being met. Based on this information as
amended between August 30, 2013 and implementation and enforcement of well as discussions with the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
January 15, 2017, as adopted by the NSPS and NESHAPs for all sources Compliance and Enforcement Division
NMED. The delegation of authority (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources) and the Criminal Investigation Division
under this action does not apply to to the NMED. The direct final rule and within EPA Region 6, we have not
sources located in Bernalillo County, proposal were published without prior identified sufficient information to
New Mexico, or to sources located in proposal because EPA anticipated no support the necessary finding for
areas defined as Indian Country. The relevant adverse comments. See 83 FR disapproval of the requested NESHAP
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:01 Sep 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM 12SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_46281/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-12 02:07:16
Document Modified: 2018-09-12 02:07:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; partial withdrawal. | |
| Dates | Effective September 12, 2018, FDA withdraws amendatory instruction 13 on page 56144 of the final rule published at 80 FR 55908 at 56144 on September 17, 2015. Submit either electronic or written comments by October 12, 2018. | |
| Contact | Jenny Scott, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2166. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 46104 | |
| CFR Associated | Food Packaging and Foods |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR