83_FR_47533 83 FR 47351 - Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D., Decision and Order

83 FR 47351 - Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D., Decision and Order

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 182 (September 19, 2018)

Page Range47351-47352
FR Document2018-20384

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47351-47352]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20384]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D., Decision and Order

    On February 7, 2018, the Acting Assistant Administrator, Diversion 
Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
Order to Show Cause to Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D. (Registrant), who is 
registered in Somerset and East Brunswick, New Jersey. The Show Cause 
Order proposed to revoke Registrant's two DEA Certificates of 
Registration, Nos. BW8636219 and BW4026375, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 
824(a)(3), on the ground that she does not have authority to handle 
controlled substances in New Jersey, the state in which she is 
registered with the DEA, and to deny any applications for renewal or 
modification and any applications for any other DEA registrations. GX 2 
(Order to Show Cause), at 1.
    With respect to the Agency's jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order 
alleged that Registrant is registered with the DEA as a practitioner 
authorized to handle controlled substances in schedules II through V 
under two DEA Certificate of Registrations: No. BW4026375 at the 
registered address of 49 Veronica Avenue, Somerset, New Jersey, and No. 
BW8636219, at the registered address of 620 Cranbury Road, Suite #115, 
East Brunswick, New Jersey. Id. at 2. The Order stated that both of 
Registrant's registrations were due to expire on May 31, 2018. Id.
    Regarding the substantive grounds for the proceeding, the Show 
Cause Order specifically alleged that the New Jersey State Board of 
Medical Examiners issued an Order of Temporary Suspension ``suspending 
[her] New Jersey medical license.'' ``Consequently, the DEA must revoke 
[her] DEA registrations based on [her] lack of authority to handle 
controlled substances in the State of New Jersey.'' Id. at 2, citing 21 
U.S.C. 824(a)(3) and 21 CFR 1301.37(b).
    The Show Cause Order then notified Registrant of her right to 
request a hearing on the allegations, or to submit a written statement 
in lieu of a hearing, the procedure for doing either, and the 
consequence for failing to elect either option. Id. at 2, citing 21 CFR 
1301.43. It also notified her of her right to submit a corrective 
action plan in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 824(c). Id. at 2-3.
    On February 15, 2018, two DEA Diversion Investigators, accompanied 
by a Task Force Officer, personally served Registrant with the Order to 
Show

[[Page 47352]]

Cause at her residence at 1000 Avenue at Port Imperial, Number 706, 
Weehawken, New Jersey. GX 4 (Declaration of Service of Order to Show 
Cause) at 1-2.
    On April 13, 2018, the Government submitted a Request for Final 
Agency Action (RFAA) and the evidentiary record to my Office. The 
Government represented that ``Registrant has not requested a hearing 
and has not otherwise corresponded or communicated with DEA regarding 
the Order served on her, including the filing of any written statement 
in lieu of a hearing.'' RFAA, at 1-2.
    Based on the Government's representation that more than 30 days 
have now passed since the date of service of the Show Cause Order and 
that Registrant has not submitted a request for a hearing or any other 
reply, I find that Registrant has waived her right to a hearing or to 
submit a written statement in lieu of a hearing. 21 CFR 1301.43(d). I 
therefore issue this Decision and Final Order based on relevant 
evidence contained in the record submitted by the Government. 21 CFR 
1301.43(d) & (e). I make the following findings of fact.
    Registrant is the holder of two DEA Registrations pursuant to which 
she is authorized to dispense controlled substances in schedules II-V 
as a practitioner at the registered address of 49 Veronica Avenue, 
Somerset, New Jersey (Registration No. BW4026375), and at the 
registered address of 620 Cranbury Road, Suite #115, East Brunswick, 
New Jersey (Registration No. BW8636219). GX 1 at 1-2.
    On April 12, 2018, the Associate Chief of the DEA Registration and 
Program Support Section certified that both registrations were due to 
expire by their terms on May 31, 2018. Id. at 1-2. She further stated 
that ``[Registrant] has no other pending or valid DEA registrations in 
New Jersey or in any other state.'' Id. at 1-2. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
556(e), I take official notice of Registrant's registration record with 
the Agency. See also 21 CFR 1316.59(e).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), an agency 
``may take official notice of facts at any stage in a proceeding--
even in the final decision.'' U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney 
General's Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act 80 (1947) (Wm. 
W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint 1979). In accordance with the APA and 
DEA's regulations, Respondent is ``entitled on timely request to an 
opportunity to show to the contrary.'' 5 U.S.C. 556(e); see also 21 
CFR 1316.59(e). To allow Respondent the opportunity to refute the 
facts of which I take official notice, Respondent may file a motion 
for reconsideration within 15 calendar days of service of this order 
which shall commence on the date this order is mailed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A review of Agency registration records shows that Registrant has 
not filed any applications for renewal, nor has she filed a new 
application for a DEA Registration. Accordingly, I find that 
Registrant's registrations expired on May 31, 2018, and that there is 
no application to act upon.
    Having reviewed the record, I hold that this proceeding is now 
moot. DEA has long held that ``if a registrant has not submitted a 
timely renewal application prior to the expiration date, then the 
registration expires and there is nothing to revoke.'' Donald Brooks 
Reece II, M.D., 77 FR 35054 (2012) (quoting Ronald J. Riegel, 63 FR 
67132, 67133 (1998); see also Thomas E. Mitchell, 76 FR 20032, 20033 
(2011), Donald Kenneth Shreves, D.V.M, 83 FR 22518 (2018). Moreover, in 
the absence of an application (whether timely filed or not), there is 
nothing to act upon. Accordingly, because Respondent has allowed her 
registrations to expire and has not filed either a renewal or a new 
application, this case is now moot and will be dismissed.

Order

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well 
as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that the Order to Show Cause issued to 
Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D., be, and it hereby is, dismissed. This Order 
is effective immediately.

    Dated: September 12, 2018.
Uttam Dhillon,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-20384 Filed 9-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P



                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 19, 2018 / Notices                                            47351

                                              seeking review of the Commission’s                         On April 5, 2018, the Commission                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                              finding of violation as to the ’577 and                 determined to modify the remedial
                                              ’668 patents. Arista Networks, Inc. v.                  orders to suspend enforcement of those                Drug Enforcement Administration
                                              Int’l Trade Comm’n, Appeal No. 17–                      orders with respect to the ’668 patent.
                                              2336. On August 3, 2017, the Federal                                                                          Sharon C. Worosilo, M.D., Decision
                                                                                                      Notice (Apr. 5, 2018); Comm’n Order
                                              Circuit consolidated the Arista and                                                                           and Order
                                                                                                      (Apr. 5, 2018).
                                              Cisco appeals. Cisco Sys., Inc. v. Int’l                                                                         On February 7, 2018, the Acting
                                                                                                         On June 26, 2018, the Commission
                                              Trade Comm’n, Appeal No. 17–2289,                                                                             Assistant Administrator, Diversion
                                              Dkt. No. 20.                                            accepted the ALJ’s recommended
                                                                                                      determination finding no infringement                 Control Division, Drug Enforcement
                                                 On August 25, 2017, Arista filed a                                                                         Administration (DEA), issued an Order
                                              motion with the Federal Circuit seeking                 with respect to the ’577 patent and
                                                                                                      determined to modify the remedial                     to Show Cause to Sharon C. Worosilo,
                                              to stay the Commission’s remedial                                                                             M.D. (Registrant), who is registered in
                                              orders pending resolution of the appeal                 orders to exempt Arista’s redesigned
                                                                                                                                                            Somerset and East Brunswick, New
                                              on the merits. On September 22, 2017,                   products that were the subject of the
                                                                                                                                                            Jersey. The Show Cause Order proposed
                                              the Federal Circuit denied this request                 modification proceeding. The
                                                                                                                                                            to revoke Registrant’s two DEA
                                              ‘‘subject to the condition that the                     Commission also determined to suspend                 Certificates of Registration, Nos.
                                              product redesign on which Cisco relies                  the modification proceeding as to the                 BW8636219 and BW4026375, pursuant
                                              to deny irreparable harm must be                        ’668 patent. The ’577 patent expired on               to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), on the ground
                                              permitted to enter the country, without                 June 30, 2018.                                        that she does not have authority to
                                              being blocked by the Commission order                      On August 27, 2018, the Federal                    handle controlled substances in New
                                              under review in this case, unless and                   Circuit granted a motion of the parties               Jersey, the state in which she is
                                              until Commission proceedings are                        to voluntarily dismiss the consolidated               registered with the DEA, and to deny
                                              initiated and completed to produce an                   appeal from the Commission’s final                    any applications for renewal or
                                              enforceable determination that such a                   determination on violation. Cisco Sys.,               modification and any applications for
                                              redesign is barred by the order here                    Inc., Appeal No. 17–2289, Dkt. No. 121                any other DEA registrations. GX 2
                                              under review or by a new or amended                                                                           (Order to Show Cause), at 1.
                                                                                                      (Aug. 27, 2018).
                                              order.’’ Cisco Sys, Inc. v. ITC; Arista                                                                          With respect to the Agency’s
                                              Networks, Inc. v. ITC, Appeal Nos.                         On August 27, 2018, Cisco and Arista               jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
                                              2017–2289, –2351, Order at 3 (Fed. Cir.                 filed a joint motion to terminate the                 alleged that Registrant is registered with
                                              Sept. 22, 2017).                                        modification proceeding in its entirety               the DEA as a practitioner authorized to
                                                 On September 27, 2017, Cisco                         pursuant to Commission Rule                           handle controlled substances in
                                              petitioned for a modification proceeding                210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)) based              schedules II through V under two DEA
                                              to determine whether Arista’s                           on a settlement agreement between the                 Certificate of Registrations: No.
                                              redesigned switches infringe the patent                 parties. The motion indicates that the                BW4026375 at the registered address of
                                              claims that are the subject of the LEO                  Agreement fully resolves the disputed                 49 Veronica Avenue, Somerset, New
                                              and CDO issued in this investigation                    issues in the modification proceeding,                Jersey, and No. BW8636219, at the
                                              and for modification of the remedial                    that there are no other agreements,                   registered address of 620 Cranbury
                                              orders to specify the status of these                   written or oral, express or implied,                  Road, Suite #115, East Brunswick, New
                                              redesigned products.                                    between them concerning the subject                   Jersey. Id. at 2. The Order stated that
                                                 On November 1, 2017, the                             matter of this proceeding, and that the               both of Registrant’s registrations were
                                              Commission instituted the modification                  motion includes a public version of this              due to expire on May 31, 2018. Id.
                                              proceeding. 82 FR 50678 (Nov. 1, 2017).                 Motion along with an accompanying                        Regarding the substantive grounds for
                                              On November 7, 2018, the Commission                     public version of the Agreement. The                  the proceeding, the Show Cause Order
                                              issued a notice clarifying that OUII is                 motion also contends that termination                 specifically alleged that the New Jersey
                                              not named as a party in the modification                of the modification proceeding will not               State Board of Medical Examiners
                                              proceeding. 82 FR 52318 (Nov. 13,                       adversely affect the public interest.                 issued an Order of Temporary
                                              2017).                                                                                                        Suspension ‘‘suspending [her] New
                                                 On February 14, 2018, the Federal                       The Commission has determined to                   Jersey medical license.’’ ‘‘Consequently,
                                              Circuit summarily affirmed the PTAB’s                   grant the joint motion and terminate the              the DEA must revoke [her] DEA
                                              decision finding the claims of the ’668                 modification proceeding in its entirety.              registrations based on [her] lack of
                                              patent unpatentable. Cisco Systems, Inc.                We note that only the ’668 patent                     authority to handle controlled
                                              v. Arista Networks, Inc., Appeal No. 17–                remains in the modification proceeding.               substances in the State of New Jersey.’’
                                              2384, Order (Feb. 14, 2018). The Court                     The authority for the Commission’s                 Id. at 2, citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3) and
                                              issued the mandate on March 23, 2018.                   determination is contained in section                 21 CFR 1301.37(b).
                                              Id., Dkt. No. 54.                                       337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                        The Show Cause Order then notified
                                                 On March 23, 2018, the ALJ issued a                  amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                 Registrant of her right to request a
                                              recommended determination in the                        210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      hearing on the allegations, or to submit
                                              modification proceeding (‘‘MRD’’),                      Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                   a written statement in lieu of a hearing,
                                              finding that Arista’s redesigned                        210).                                                 the procedure for doing either, and the
                                              products infringe the relevant claims of                                                                      consequence for failing to elect either
                                              the ’668 patent but do not infringe the                   By order of the Commission.                         option. Id. at 2, citing 21 CFR 1301.43.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                              relevant claims of the ’577 patent. MRD                   Issued: September 14, 2018.                         It also notified her of her right to submit
                                              (Mar. 23, 2018). Also on March 23,                      Lisa Barton,                                          a corrective action plan in accordance
                                              2018, the ALJ issued an order denying                   Secretary to the Commission.                          with 21 U.S.C. 824(c). Id. at 2–3.
                                              Arista’s motion to stay the modification                [FR Doc. 2018–20363 Filed 9–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                               On February 15, 2018, two DEA
                                              proceedings or to stay the remedial                                                                           Diversion Investigators, accompanied by
                                                                                                      BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                              orders with respect to the ’668 patent.                                                                       a Task Force Officer, personally served
                                              Order No. 20 (Mar. 23, 2018).                                                                                 Registrant with the Order to Show


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:09 Sep 18, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM   19SEN1


                                              47352                   Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 19, 2018 / Notices

                                              Cause at her residence at 1000 Avenue                   filed any applications for renewal, nor               823(f), 824(a)(4)). For the same reason,
                                              at Port Imperial, Number 706,                           has she filed a new application for a                 the Order also proposed the denial of
                                              Weehawken, New Jersey. GX 4                             DEA Registration. Accordingly, I find                 any of Registrant’s ‘‘pending
                                              (Declaration of Service of Order to Show                that Registrant’s registrations expired on            applications for renewal or modification
                                              Cause) at 1–2.                                          May 31, 2018, and that there is no                    of such registration, and . . . any
                                                 On April 13, 2018, the Government                    application to act upon.                              applications for any other DEA
                                              submitted a Request for Final Agency                       Having reviewed the record, I hold                 registrations.’’ Id.
                                              Action (RFAA) and the evidentiary                       that this proceeding is now moot. DEA                    More specifically, the Show Cause
                                              record to my Office. The Government                     has long held that ‘‘if a registrant has              Order set forth six independent reasons
                                              represented that ‘‘Registrant has not                   not submitted a timely renewal                        why the Government alleges that
                                              requested a hearing and has not                         application prior to the expiration date,             Respondent’s registration should be
                                              otherwise corresponded or                               then the registration expires and there is            revoked. Id. at 1–3. The Show Cause
                                              communicated with DEA regarding the                     nothing to revoke.’’ Donald Brooks                    Order first charged that Respondent’s
                                              Order served on her, including the filing               Reece II, M.D., 77 FR 35054 (2012)                    ‘‘pre-signing of prescriptions for
                                              of any written statement in lieu of a                   (quoting Ronald J. Riegel, 63 FR 67132,               controlled substances violated [21] 1
                                              hearing.’’ RFAA, at 1–2.                                67133 (1998); see also Thomas E.                      CFR 1306.05(a).’’ Id. at 2. The Order
                                                 Based on the Government’s                            Mitchell, 76 FR 20032, 20033 (2011),                  states that this charge is based on the
                                              representation that more than 30 days                   Donald Kenneth Shreves, D.V.M, 83 FR                  allegation that in 2006, the Arkansas
                                              have now passed since the date of                       22518 (2018). Moreover, in the absence                State Medical Board found that
                                              service of the Show Cause Order and                     of an application (whether timely filed               Respondent violated Arkansas and
                                              that Registrant has not submitted a                     or not), there is nothing to act upon.                federal laws when (1) he ‘‘pre-signed
                                              request for a hearing or any other reply,               Accordingly, because Respondent has                   controlled substance prescriptions,
                                              I find that Registrant has waived her                   allowed her registrations to expire and               which [his] staff members, who were
                                              right to a hearing or to submit a written               has not filed either a renewal or a new               not authorized by law to issue such
                                              statement in lieu of a hearing. 21 CFR                  application, this case is now moot and                prescriptions, then issued to patients’’
                                              1301.43(d). I therefore issue this                      will be dismissed.                                    and (2) he ‘‘[was] not present and [was]
                                              Decision and Final Order based on                                                                             not consulted by [his] staff when such
                                              relevant evidence contained in the                      Order
                                                                                                                                                            prescriptions were issued.’’ Id. at 1–2.
                                              record submitted by the Government. 21                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me              The Order further alleged that in 2006,
                                              CFR 1301.43(d) & (e). I make the                        by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well as 28 CFR                as a result of these findings, the
                                              following findings of fact.                             0.100(b), I order that the Order to Show              Arkansas Board suspended
                                                 Registrant is the holder of two DEA                  Cause issued to Sharon C. Worosilo,                   Respondent’s medical license for six
                                              Registrations pursuant to which she is                  M.D., be, and it hereby is, dismissed.                months. Id. at 2.
                                              authorized to dispense controlled                       This Order is effective immediately.                     The Show Cause Order also set forth
                                              substances in schedules II–V as a
                                              practitioner at the registered address of                 Dated: September 12, 2018.                          five charges of recordkeeping violations
                                              49 Veronica Avenue, Somerset, New                       Uttam Dhillon,                                        based on DEA’s July 4, 2014 ‘‘on-site
                                              Jersey (Registration No. BW4026375),                    Acting Administrator.
                                                                                                                                                            inspection of [Respondent’s] registered
                                              and at the registered address of 620                                                                          location.’’ Id. First, the Order charged
                                                                                                      [FR Doc. 2018–20384 Filed 9–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                              Cranbury Road, Suite #115, East                                                                               that Respondent ‘‘failed to maintain an
                                                                                                      BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
                                              Brunswick, New Jersey (Registration No.                                                                       initial inventory of all controlled
                                              BW8636219). GX 1 at 1–2.                                                                                      substances in violation of 21 U.S.C.
                                                 On April 12, 2018, the Associate Chief               DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                 827(a)(3) & 842(a)(5) and 21 CFR
                                              of the DEA Registration and Program                                                                           1304.11(b).’’ Id. Second, the Order
                                              Support Section certified that both                     Drug Enforcement Administration                       charged that he ‘‘failed to maintain
                                              registrations were due to expire by their                                                                     complete and accurate dispensing
                                                                                                      [Docket No. 16–22]                                    records in violation of 21 U.S.C.
                                              terms on May 31, 2018. Id. at 1–2. She
                                              further stated that ‘‘[Registrant] has no                                                                     827(a)(3) & 842(a)(5) and 21 CFR
                                                                                                      Brian Thomas Nichol, M.D., Decision                   1304.21(a).’’ Id. at 2–3. Third, the Order
                                              other pending or valid DEA registrations                and Order
                                              in New Jersey or in any other state.’’ Id.                                                                    charged that, during the on-site
                                              at 1–2. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), I                     On March 14, 2016, the Deputy                      inspection, Respondent ‘‘could not
                                              take official notice of Registrant’s                    Assistant Administrator, Office of                    provide a DEA–222 order form dated
                                              registration record with the Agency. See                Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement                   [January 16, 2014], for an order of
                                              also 21 CFR 1316.59(e).1                                Administration, issued an Order to                    oxycodone tablets, in violation of 21
                                                 A review of Agency registration                      Show Cause to Brian Thomas Nichol,                    U.S.C. [842](a)(5) and 21 CFR
                                              records shows that Registrant has not                   M.D. (Respondent), which proposed the                 1305.17(a).’’ 2 Id. at 3. Fourth, the Order
                                                                                                      revocation of his DEA Certificate of
                                                 1 Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),                                                               1 Although the Order erroneously referenced Title
                                                                                                      Registration No. BN4578057, pursuant
                                              an agency ‘‘may take official notice of facts at any                                                          42 of the Code of Federal Regulations for this
                                              stage in a proceeding—even in the final decision.’’
                                                                                                      to which he is authorized to dispense                 violation, Government counsel corrected the error
                                              U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney General’s Manual on     controlled substances in schedules II                 during his Opening Statement at the administrative
                                              the Administrative Procedure Act 80 (1947) (Wm.         through V as a practitioner, at the                   hearing when he made clear that Title 21 was the
                                              W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint 1979). In accordance     registered address of 5106 McLanahan                  title that the Government had intended to allege.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                              with the APA and DEA’s regulations, Respondent                                                                See Transcript (Tr.) 18. Respondent raised no
                                              is ‘‘entitled on timely request to an opportunity to
                                                                                                      Drive, Suite B, North Little Rock,                    objection based on the erroneous title reference, and
                                              show to the contrary.’’ 5 U.S.C. 556(e); see also 21    Arkansas. Administrative Law Judge                    I find that this error was merely a scrivener’s error
                                              CFR 1316.59(e). To allow Respondent the                 Exhibit (ALJ Ex.) 1, at 1. As grounds for             and that Respondent had adequate notice of the
                                              opportunity to refute the facts of which I take         the proposed action, the Show Cause                   charged violation.
                                              official notice, Respondent may file a motion for                                                                2 Although the Order erroneously referenced an

                                              reconsideration within 15 calendar days of service
                                                                                                      Order alleged that Respondent’s                       August 28, 2013 DEA 222 form for this charge, the
                                              of this order which shall commence on the date this     ‘‘registration would be inconsistent with             Government corrected the date of the allegedly
                                              order is mailed.                                        the public interest.’’ Id. (citing 21 U.S.C.          missing DEA 222 form to January 16, 2014 in its



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:09 Sep 18, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00025   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM   19SEN1



Document Created: 2018-09-19 02:55:20
Document Modified: 2018-09-19 02:55:20
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation83 FR 47351 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR