83 FR 47566 - Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: Infrastructure Monitoring Requirements for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 183 (September 20, 2018)

Page Range		47566-47568
FR Document		2018-20448

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving elements of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions from the State of Utah to demonstrate the State meets infrastructure monitoring requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for lead (Pb) on October 15, 2008, nitrogen dioxide (NO<INF>2</INF>) on January 22, 2010, sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) on June 2, 2010, and fine particulate matter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) on December 14, 2012. The EPA is taking this action pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47566-47568]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20448]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2018-0388-0001; FRL-9983-73--Region 8]

Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and
Promulgations: Infrastructure Monitoring Requirements for the 2008 Pb,
2010 SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
elements of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions from the State of
Utah to demonstrate the State meets infrastructure monitoring
requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for lead (Pb) on October 15,
2008, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on January 22, 2010, sulfur
dioxide (SO2) on June 2, 2010, and fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) on December 14, 2012. The EPA is taking this action
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This rule is effective on October 22, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2018-0388-0001. All documents in the docket
are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For
Further Information Contact section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Gregory, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6175,
gregory.kate@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

The background for this action is discussed in detail in our July
23, 2018 proposal (83 FR 34816). In that document we proposed to
approve the State's submittal in reference to infrastructure
requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(B), element B: Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system. In the proposal, we find that Utah's
SIP and practices are adequate for the

[[Page 47567]]

ambient air quality monitoring and data system requirements and
therefore propose to approve the infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Pb,
2010 SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS for this element.

II. Response to Comments

The EPA received six anonymous comments on the proposal. After
reviewing the comments, the EPA has determined that the comments are
outside the scope of our proposed action or fail to identify any
material issue necessitating a response. All comments received on this
action are available for review in the docket for this rulemaking. This
rule will be finalized as proposed without revisions.

III. Final Action

We are approving infrastructure element B for the 2008 Pb, 2010
SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
from the State's certifications as shown in Table 1.

Table 1--List of Utah Infrastructure Elements That the EPA Is Approving
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval Element
------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2012 submittal--2008 Pb NAAQS.................... (B)
January 31, 2013 submittal--2010 NO2 NAAQS................... (B)
June 2, 2013 submittal--2010 SO2 NAAQS....................... (B)
December 4, 2015 submittal--2012 PM2.5 NAAQS................. (B)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the basis of our approval, please refer to the July 23, 2018
proposal (83 FR 34816).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 19, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Greenhouse
gases, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: September 14, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.

40 CFR part 52 is amended to follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Section 52.2355 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:

Sec. 52.2355 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.

* * * * *
(d) The Utah Department of Environmental Quality submitted
certification of Utah's infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on
January 19, 2012; 2010 NO2 NAAQS on January 31, 2013; 2010
SO2 NAAQS on June 2, 2013; and 2012 PM2.5 on
December 4, 2015. Utah's infrastructure certifications demonstrate how
the State, where applicable, has plans in place that meet the
requirements of section 110 for the 2008 Pb, 2010 NO2, 2010
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The State's
Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Pb, 2010

[[Page 47568]]

NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is
approved with respect to 110(a)(2)(B).

[FR Doc. 2018-20448 Filed 9-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

47566 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

State EPA
Rule No. Rule title effective effective Final rule citation/date Comments
date date

* * * * * * *
Section 03 ......... Emission standards for nitrogen ox- 12/20/2016 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
ides. citation]. 9/20/2018.

* * * * * * *
Section 09 ......... Incorporation by reference .................. 2/5/2018 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
citation]. 9/20/2018.

* * * * * * *

Chapter 06. Permitting Requirements

* * * * * * *
Section 04 ......... Prevention of significant deterioration 12/20/2016 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.

* * * * * * *
Section 14 ......... Incorporation by reference .................. 2/5/2018 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.

* * * * * * *

Chapter 08. Non-attainment Area Regulations

* * * * * * *
Section 03 ......... Conformity of general federal actions 2/5/2018 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
to state implementation plans. citation]. September 20,
2018.

* * * * * * *
Section 10 ......... Incorporation by reference .................. 2/5/2018 10/22/2018 [Insert Federal Register
citation]. September 20,
2018.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * infrastructure monitoring requirements available through http://
[FR Doc. 2018–20447 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am] of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) for www.regulations.gov, or please contact
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P the National Ambient Air Quality the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for INFORMATION CONTACT section for
lead (Pb) on October 15, 2008, nitrogen additional availability information.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION dioxide (NO2) on January 22, 2010, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
AGENCY sulfur dioxide (SO2) on June 2, 2010, Gregory, Air Program, U.S.
and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on Environmental Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 52 December 14, 2012. The EPA is taking (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
[EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0388–0001; FRL– this action pursuant to section 110 of 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
9983–73—Region 8] the Clean Air Act (CAA). 80202–1129, (303) 312–6175,
DATES: This rule is effective on October gregory.kate@epa.gov.
Air Quality State Implementation 22, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Plans; Approvals and Promulgations:
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
Infrastructure Monitoring
docket for this action under Docket ID and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
Requirements for the 2008 Pb, 2010
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0388–0001.
SO2, 2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 National I. Background
All documents in the docket are listed
Ambient Air Quality Standards; Utah
on the http://www.regulations.gov The background for this action is
AGENCY: Environmental Protection website. Although listed in the index, discussed in detail in our July 23, 2018
Agency (EPA). some information is not publicly proposal (83 FR 34816). In that
available, e.g., CBI or other information document we proposed to approve the
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2

ACTION: Final rule.
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. State’s submittal in reference to
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Certain other material, such as infrastructure requirements for CAA
Agency (EPA) is approving elements of copyrighted material, is not placed on section 110(a)(2)(B), element B: Ambient
State Implementation Plan (SIP) the internet and will be publicly air quality monitoring/data system. In
revisions from the State of Utah to available only in hard copy form. the proposal, we find that Utah’s SIP
demonstrate the State meets Publicly available docket materials are and practices are adequate for the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Sep 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 47567

ambient air quality monitoring and data • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 publication of the rule in the Federal
system requirements and therefore FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory Register. A major rule cannot take effect
propose to approve the infrastructure action because SIP approvals are until 60 days after it is published in the
SIP for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2, 2010 NO2 exempted under Executive Order 12866; Federal Register. This action is not a
and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for this • Does not impose an information ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
element. collection burden under the provisions 804(2).
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
II. Response to Comments Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
The EPA received six anonymous • Is certified as not having a this action must be filed in the United
comments on the proposal. After significant economic impact on a States Court of Appeals for the
reviewing the comments, the EPA has substantial number of small entities appropriate circuit by November 19,
determined that the comments are under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 2018. Filing a petition for
outside the scope of our proposed action U.S.C. 601 et seq.); reconsideration by the Administrator of
or fail to identify any material issue • Does not contain any unfunded this final rule does not affect the finality
necessitating a response. All comments mandate or significantly or uniquely of this action for the purposes of judicial
received on this action are available for affect small governments, described in review nor does it extend the time
review in the docket for this the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of within which a petition for judicial
rulemaking. This rule will be finalized 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); review may be filed, and shall not
as proposed without revisions. • Does not have federalism postpone the effectiveness of such rule
implications as specified in Executive or action. This action may not be
III. Final Action challenged later in proceedings to
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
We are approving infrastructure 1999); enforce its requirements. (See section
element B for the 2008 Pb, 2010 SO2, • Is not an economically significant 307(b)(2).)
2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS from regulatory action based on health or List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
the State’s certifications as shown in safety risks subject to Executive Order
Table 1. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Environmental protection, Air
• Is not a significant regulatory action pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
TABLE 1—LIST OF UTAH INFRASTRUC- subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Incorporation by reference,
28355, May 22, 2001); Intergovernmental relations,
TURE ELEMENTS THAT THE EPA IS
• Is not subject to requirements of Greenhouse gases, Lead, Nitrogen
APPROVING dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Reporting and recordkeeping
Approval Element
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
January 19, 2012 submittal—2008 application of those requirements would organic compounds.
Pb NAAQS .................................. (B) be inconsistent with the CAA; and Dated: September 14, 2018.
January 31, 2013 submittal—2010
• Does not provide the EPA with the Douglas Benevento,
NO2 NAAQS ............................... (B)
June 2, 2013 submittal—2010 SO2 discretionary authority to address, as Regional Administrator, Region 8.
NAAQS ........................................ (B) appropriate, disproportionate human 40 CFR part 52 is amended to follows:
December 4, 2015 submittal—2012 health or environmental effects, using
PM2.5 NAAQS ............................. (B) practicable and legally permissible PART 52—APPROVAL AND
methods, under Executive Order 12898 PROMULGATION OF
For the basis of our approval, please (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
refer to the July 23, 2018 proposal (83 In addition, the SIP is not approved to
FR 34816). apply on any Indian reservation land or ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
in any other area where EPA or an continues to read as follows:
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews Indian tribe has demonstrated that a Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Under the Clean Air Act, the Indian country, the rule does not have Subpart TT—Utah
Administrator is required to approve a tribal implications and will not impose ■ 2. Section 52.2355 is amended by
SIP submission that complies with the substantial direct costs on tribal adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
provisions of the Act and applicable governments or preempt tribal law as
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 § 52.2355 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP FR 67249, November 9, 2000). requirements.
submissions, the EPA’s role is to The Congressional Review Act, 5 * * * * *
approve state choices, provided that U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small (d) The Utah Department of
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Business Regulatory Enforcement Environmental Quality submitted
Act. Accordingly, this action merely Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides certification of Utah’s infrastructure SIP
approves state law as meeting federal that before a rule may take effect, the for the 2008 Pb NAAQS on January 19,
requirements and does not impose agency promulgating the rule must 2012; 2010 NO2 NAAQS on January 31,
additional requirements beyond those submit a rule report, which includes a 2013; 2010 SO2 NAAQS on June 2,
imposed by state law. For that reason, copy of the rule, to each House of the 2013; and 2012 PM2.5 on December 4,
this action: Congress and to the Comptroller General 2015. Utah’s infrastructure certifications
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory of the United States. The EPA will demonstrate how the State, where
action’’ subject to review by the Office submit a report containing this action applicable, has plans in place that meet
of Management and Budget under and other required information to the the requirements of section 110 for the
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 2008 Pb, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Representatives, and the Comptroller PM2.5 NAAQS. The State’s
January 21, 2011); General of the United States prior to Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Pb, 2010

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Sep 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

47568 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

NO2, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS I. Background Information of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
is approved with respect to 110(a)(2)(B). On July 23, 2018, the EPA proposed U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
[FR Doc. 2018–20448 Filed 9–19–18; 8:45 am] to approve Washington as meeting the • is certified as not having a
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P requirement that each SIP contain significant economic impact on a
adequate provisions to prohibit substantial number of small entities
emissions that will contribute under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION significantly to nonattainment or U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
AGENCY interfere with maintenance of the 2015 • does not contain any unfunded
ozone NAAQS in any other state (83 FR mandate or significantly or uniquely
40 CFR Part 52 34813). An explanation of the Clean Air affect small governments, as described
Act requirements, a detailed analysis of in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0061; FRL–9983–
the submittal, and the EPA’s reasons for of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
83—Region 10] • does not have Federalism
proposing approval were provided in
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and implications as specified in Executive
Air Plan Approval; Washington; Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
Interstate Transport Requirements for will not be restated here. The public
comment period for the proposal ended 1999);
the 2015 Ozone NAAQS • is not an economically significant
August 22, 2018.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection regulatory action based on health or
Agency (EPA). II. Response to Comments safety risks subject to Executive Order
We received several anonymous 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
ACTION: Final rule. • is not a significant regulatory action
comments unrelated to Washington’s
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) submission. After reviewing the subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
requires each State Implementation Plan anonymous comments, we have 28355, May 22, 2001);
determined that the comments are • is not subject to requirements of
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions
outside the scope of our proposed action Section 12(d) of the National
prohibiting emissions that will have
and fail to identify any material issue Technology Transfer and Advancement
certain adverse air quality effects in
necessitating a response. For more Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
other states. On February 7, 2018, the
information, please see our this action does not involve technical
State of Washington made a submittal to
memorandum included in the docket for standards; and
the Environmental Protection Agency • does not provide the EPA with the
(EPA) to address these requirements for this action.
discretionary authority to address, as
the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air III. Final Action appropriate, disproportionate human
Quality Standards (NAAQS). The EPA is health or environmental effects, using
approving the submittal as meeting the The EPA is approving Washington’s
February 7, 2018, submittal certifying practicable and legally permissible
requirement that each SIP contain methods, under Executive Order 12898
adequate provisions to prohibit that the SIP is sufficient to meet the
interstate transport requirements of (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
emissions that will significantly The SIP is not approved to apply on
contribute to nonattainment or interfere Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. any Indian reservation land and is also
with maintenance of the 2015 ozone not approved to apply in any other area
NAAQS in any other state. IV. Statutory and Executive Order where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
DATES: This final rule is effective Reviews demonstrated that a tribe has
October 22, 2018. Under the Clean Air Act, the jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a Administrator is required to approve a country, the rule does not have tribal
docket for this action under Docket ID SIP submission that complies with the implications as specified by Executive
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0061. All provisions of the Clean Air Act and Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
documents in the docket are listed on applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 2000).
the https://www.regulations.gov 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in The Congressional Review Act, 5
website. Although listed in the index, reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
some information is not publicly role is to approve state choices, Business Regulatory Enforcement
available, e.g., CBI or other information provided that they meet the criteria of Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
the disclosure of which is restricted by the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this that before a rule may take effect, the
statute. Certain other material, such as action merely approves state law as agency promulgating the rule must
copyrighted material, is not placed on meeting federal requirements and does submit a rule report, which includes a
the internet and is publicly available not impose additional requirements copy of the rule, to each House of the
only in hard copy form. Publicly beyond those imposed by state law. For Congress and to the Comptroller General
available docket materials are available that reason, this action: of the United States. The EPA will
at https://www.regulations.gov, or • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory submit a report containing this action
please contact the person identified in action’’ subject to review by the Office and other required information to the
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT of Management and Budget under U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
section for additional availability Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Representatives, and the Comptroller
information. October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, General of the United States prior to
January 21, 2011); publication of the rule in the Federal
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES2

Register. A major rule cannot take effect
Hunt at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory until 60 days after it is published in the
epa.gov.
action because actions such as SIP Federal Register. This action is not a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: approvals are exempted under ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
Throughout this document wherever Executive Order 12866; 804(2).
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is • does not impose an information Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
intended to refer to the EPA. collection burden under the provisions Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Sep 19, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

Document Created: 2018-09-20 02:08:53
Document Modified: 2018-09-20 02:08:53

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective on October 22, 2018.
Contact		Kate Gregory, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6175, [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 47566
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Greenhouse Gases; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds