83 FR 48777 - Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units and Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Negative Declarations for Designated Facilities and Pollutants
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 188 (September 27, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 188 (September 27, 2018)
| Page Range | 48777-48779 | |
| FR Document | 2018-20967 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 48777-48779] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-20967] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0588; FRL-9984-57--Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units and Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Negative Declarations for Designated Facilities and Pollutants AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the public that we have received negative declarations from Minnesota pertaining to the presence of Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) units and Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) units in Minnesota. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) submitted its CISWI negative declaration by letter dated February 3, 2017, and its OSWI negative declaration by letter dated June 21, 2017. MPCA notified EPA in its negative declaration letters that there are no CISWI or OSWI units subject to the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act) currently operating in Minnesota. DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 29, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2018-0588, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to cain.alexis@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sieffert, Environmental Engineer, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (AT-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-1151, sieffert.margaret@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. Background A. Sections 111 and 129 of the Act B. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units C. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units II. Negative Declarations and EPA Analysis A. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units B. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units III. Proposed EPA Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background A. Sections 111 and 129 of the Act Sections 111 and 129 of the Act set forth EPA's statutory authority for regulating new and existing solid waste incineration units. Section 111(b) directs EPA to publish and periodically revise a list of categories of stationary sources which cause or significantly contribute to air pollution, and to establish new source performance standards (NSPS) within these categories. Section 111(d) grants EPA statutory authority to require states to submit to the agency implementation plans for establishing performance standards applicable to existing sources belonging to those categories established in section 111(b). Section 111(d) of the Act requires states to submit plans to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new sources of a source category and EPA has established emission guidelines (EGs) for designated facilities. 40 CFR 60.21(a) and (b). Section 129 of the Act is specific to solid waste combustion, and requires EPA to establish performance standards pursuant to section 111 of the Act for each category of solid waste incineration units, which includes the categories addressed in today's action. The regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, contain general provisions applicable to the adoption and submittal of state plans for the control of [[Page 48778]] designated pollutants from designated facilities under section 111(d) of the Act, including those pollutants and facilities designated pursuant to section 129 of the Act. Further, 40 CFR part 62, subpart A, provides the procedural framework by which EPA will approve or disapprove such plans submitted by a state. If a state fails to submit a satisfactory plan, the Act provides EPA with the authority to prescribe a plan for regulating the designated pollutants at the designated facilities. The EPA prescribed plan, also known as a Federal plan, is used to regulate designated facilities when there is no EPA approved state-specific plan. Further, if there are no designated facilities within a state's jurisdiction, the state may submit to EPA a letter of certification to that effect (referred to as a ``negative declaration'') in lieu of a state plan to satisfy the state's obligation. 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. The negative declaration exempts the state from the requirement to submit a state plan for the designated pollutants and facilities. Therefore, if a state submits a negative declaration for a category of solid waste incineration units, the state is not required to submit a state plan for that source category. B. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units On December 1, 2000, EPA promulgated new source performance standards for new CISWI units, 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC, and EGs for existing CISWI units, 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD. 65 FR 75338. On March 21, 2011, EPA, after voluntarily remanding the 2000 CISWI standards and EGs, promulgated final CISWI standards and EGs. 76 FR 15704. Correspondingly, on the same date, EPA promulgated a final rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to identify which non-hazardous secondary materials, when used as fuels or ingredients in combustion units, are ``solid wastes.'' 76 FR 15456; see 40 CFR part 241, Solid Wastes Used as Fuels or Ingredients in Combustion Units (also known as the ``Non-Hazardous Secondary Material Rule''). The identification of solid waste in the Non-Hazardous Secondary Material Rule is used to determine whether a combustion unit is required to meet the emissions standards for solid waste incineration units issued under sections 111 and 129 of the Act, or meet the emissions standards for commercial, industrial, and institutional boilers issued under section 112 of the Act. EPA subsequently promulgated amendments to both rules on February 7, 2013: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste; Final Rule. 78 FR 9112. Reconsideration of certain aspects of the final CISWI rule resulted in minor amendments. 81 FR 40956 (June 23, 2016). Pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act and 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, states were required to revise their state plans for existing CISWI units to comply with the amended regulations. A CISWI unit is defined in 40 CFR 60.2875 as any distinct operating unit of any commercial or industrial facility that combusts, or has combusted in the preceding 6 months, any solid waste, as the term ``solid waste'' is defined in the Non-Hazardous Secondary Material Rule. A state plan must address all existing CISWI units that commenced construction on or before June 4, 2010, or for which modification or reconstruction was commenced on or before August 7, 2013, with limited exceptions as provided in 40 CFR 60.2555. 40 CFR 60.2550. However, as discussed above, if there are no existing designated facilities in a state, the state may submit a negative declaration in lieu of a state plan. EPA will provide public notice of receipt of a state's negative declaration with respect to that solid waste incineration unit category. 40 CFR 60.2530. If any unit of a solid waste incineration category is subsequently identified in a state for which a negative declaration had been submitted, the Federal plan implementing the EGs for that source category would apply to that unit. In the case of a CISWI unit, subpart DDDD would automatically apply to that CISWI unit until a state plan is approved. 40 CFR 60.2530. C. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units EPA promulgated new source performance standards and EGs for OSWIs on December 16, 2005. 70 FR 74870. The standards and EGs are codified at 40 CFR part 60, subparts EEEE and FFFF, respectively. Thus, states were required to submit plans for existing OSWIs pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act and 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. An OSWI unit is defined in 40 CFR 60.3078 as a very small municipal waste combustor and institutional waste incinerator. The designated facilities to which the original EGs applied to are existing OSWI units that commenced construction on or before December 9, 2004. II. Negative Declarations and EPA Analysis A. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units On February 3, 2017, MPCA submitted its CISWI negative declaration, in which MPCA certified that there are no existing CISWI units currently operating in Minnesota. Two non-waste determinations under the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule were critical elements of MPCA's February 3, 2017 negative declaration letter. Specifically, on September 25, 2015, in response to a petition to Region 5, the Regional Administrator made a non-waste determination under the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule provision at 40 CFR 241.3(c), with regard to the poultry litter burned as fuel in the boiler at the Benson Power, LLC power plant in Benson, Minnesota. The Regional Administrator determined that the poultry litter at issue was not a solid waste. Further, by letter dated October 15, 2015, ReConserve of Minnesota Inc., d/b/a Endres Processing, Rosemount, Minnesota, certified to Region 5 that it had made a non-waste self-determination under the Non- Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule provision at 40 CFR 241.3(b), with regard to the refuse derived fuel that it processes, as defined at 40 CFR 241.2, and which meets the legitimacy criteria for fuels at 40 CFR 241.3(d)(1), that the refuse derived fuel is not a solid waste. Correspondingly, by technical review document dated February 23, 2018, Region 5's Land and Chemicals Division reviewed and confirmed the non- waste self-determination. EPA's Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery correspondingly concurred with the Region's review and conclusion. B. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units On June 21, 2017, MPCA submitted its OSWI negative declaration, in which it certified that there are no existing OSWI units currently operating in Minnesota. III. Proposed EPA Action EPA is notifying the public of EPA's receipt of MPCA's negative declarations for both CISWI and OSWI facilities and that EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62 to reflect both negative declarations. For CISWI, EPA received the negative declaration on February 3, 2017, and for OSWI, EPA received the negative declaration on June 21, 2017. [[Page 48779]] IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews General Requirements This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because this action is not significant under E.O. 12866. This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and merely notifies the public of EPA's receipt of negative declarations from an air pollution control agency without any existing CISWI or OSWI units in its state. This action imposes no requirements beyond those imposed by the state. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule pertains to pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely provides notice of receipt of negative declarations, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it just notifying the public regarding receipt of the negative declarations. In reviewing state plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. With regard to negative declarations for designated facilities received by EPA from states, EPA's role is to notify the public of the receipt of such negative declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62 accordingly. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a state plan submission or negative declaration for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state plan or negative declaration submission, to use VCS in place of a state plan or negative declaration submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators, Intergovernmental relations, Other solid waste incinerator units, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: September 13, 2018. Cathy Stepp, Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2018-20967 Filed 9-26-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules 48777
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION information about CBI or multimedia
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); AGENCY submissions, and general guidance on
• Is certified as not having a making effective comments, please visit
40 CFR Part 62 http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
significant economic impact on a
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0588; FRL–9984– commenting-epa-dockets.
substantial number of small entities
57—Region 5] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Margaret Sieffert, Environmental
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Engineer, Environmental Protection
• Does not contain any unfunded Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
mandate or significantly or uniquely Incineration Units and Other Solid Boulevard (AT–18J), Chicago, Illinois
affect small governments, as described Waste Incineration Units Negative 60604, (312) 353–1151,
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Declarations for Designated Facilities sieffert.margaret@epa.gov.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); and Pollutants SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Does not have Federalism AGENCY: Environmental Protection Throughout this document whenever
implications as specified in Executive Agency (EPA). ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, ACTION: Proposed rule.
EPA. This supplementary information
1999); section is arranged as follows:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection I. Background
• Is not an economically significant Agency (EPA) is notifying the public A. Sections 111 and 129 of the Act
regulatory action based on health or that we have received negative B. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste
safety risks subject to Executive Order declarations from Minnesota pertaining Incineration Units
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); to the presence of Commercial and C. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
II. Negative Declarations and EPA Analysis
• Is not a significant regulatory action Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
A. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR (CISWI) units and Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
28355, May 22, 2001); Incineration (OSWI) units in Minnesota. B. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units
The Minnesota Pollution Control
• Is not subject to requirements of III. Proposed EPA Action
Agency (MPCA) submitted its CISWI IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Section 12(d) of the National negative declaration by letter dated
Technology Transfer and Advancement February 3, 2017, and its OSWI negative I. Background
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because declaration by letter dated June 21, A. Sections 111 and 129 of the Act
application of those requirements would 2017. MPCA notified EPA in its negative
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; Sections 111 and 129 of the Act set
declaration letters that there are no forth EPA’s statutory authority for
and CISWI or OSWI units subject to the regulating new and existing solid waste
• Does not provide EPA with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act) incineration units. Section 111(b)
discretionary authority to address, as currently operating in Minnesota. directs EPA to publish and periodically
appropriate, disproportionate human DATES: Comments must be received on revise a list of categories of stationary
health or environmental effects, using or before October 29, 2018. sources which cause or significantly
practicable and legally permissible ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, contribute to air pollution, and to
methods, under Executive Order 12898 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– establish new source performance
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). OAR–2018–0588, at http:// standards (NSPS) within these
www.regulations.gov or via email to categories. Section 111(d) grants EPA
In addition, the SIP is not approved
cain.alexis@epa.gov. For comments statutory authority to require states to
to apply on any Indian reservation land submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the submit to the agency implementation
or in any other area where EPA or an online instructions for submitting plans for establishing performance
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a comments. Once submitted, comments standards applicable to existing sources
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of cannot be edited or removed from belonging to those categories established
Indian country, the rule does not have Regulations.gov. For either manner of in section 111(b).
tribal implications and will not impose submission, EPA may publish any Section 111(d) of the Act requires
substantial direct costs on tribal comment received to its public docket. states to submit plans to control certain
governments or preempt tribal law as Do not submit electronically any pollutants (designated pollutants) at
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 information you consider to be existing facilities (designated facilities)
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Confidential Business Information (CBI) whenever standards of performance
or other information whose disclosure is have been established under section
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
restricted by statute. Multimedia 111(b) for new sources of a source
Environmental protection, Air submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be category and EPA has established
pollution control, Incorporation by accompanied by a written comment. emission guidelines (EGs) for designated
reference, Intergovernmental relations, The written comment is considered the facilities. 40 CFR 60.21(a) and (b).
Sulfur oxides. official comment and should include Section 129 of the Act is specific to
discussion of all points you wish to solid waste combustion, and requires
Dated: September 20, 2018. make. EPA will generally not consider EPA to establish performance standards
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Alexandra Dunn, comments or comment contents located pursuant to section 111 of the Act for
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. outside of the primary submission (i.e., each category of solid waste
[FR Doc. 2018–21006 Filed 9–26–18; 8:45 am] on the web, cloud, or other file sharing incineration units, which includes the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
system). For additional submission categories addressed in today’s action.
methods, please contact the person The regulations at 40 CFR part 60,
identified in the FOR FURTHER subpart B, contain general provisions
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the applicable to the adoption and submittal
full EPA public comment policy, of state plans for the control of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM 27SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_48965/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules 48779
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Act. This rule also is not subject to by Kenneth E. Hardman, on behalf of
Reviews Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, Critical Messaging Association.
April 23, 1997), because it just notifying DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must
General Requirements
the public regarding receipt of the be filed on or before October 12, 2018.
This action is not a ‘‘significant negative declarations. Replies to an opposition must be filed
regulatory action’’ under the terms of In reviewing state plan submissions, on or before October 22, 2018.
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
October 4, 1993) and therefore is not ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
provided that they meet the criteria of Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
subject to review by the Office of the Act. With regard to negative
Management and Budget under Washington, DC 20554.
declarations for designated facilities
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
received by EPA from states, EPA’s role
FR 3821, January 21, 2011). For this is to notify the public of the receipt of Nina Shafran, Wireless
reason, this action is also not subject to such negative declarations and revise 40 Telecommunications Bureau, at: (202)
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions CFR part 62 accordingly. In this context, 418–2781; email: Nina.Shafran@fcc.gov.
Concerning Regulations That in the absence of a prior existing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, requirement for the state to use summary of the Commission’s
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May voluntary consensus standards (VCS), document, Report No. 3102, released
22, 2001). This action is not an EPA has no authority to disapprove a September 10, 2018. The full text of the
Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, state plan submission or negative Petition is available for viewing and
February 2, 2017) regulatory action declaration for failure to use VCS. It copying at the FCC Reference
because this action is not significant would thus be inconsistent with Information Center, 445 12th Street SW,
under E.O. 12866. This action merely applicable law for EPA, when it reviews Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
approves state law as meeting Federal a state plan or negative declaration It also may be accessed online via the
requirements and merely notifies the submission, to use VCS in place of a Commission’s Electronic Comment
public of EPA’s receipt of negative state plan or negative declaration Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/
declarations from an air pollution submission that otherwise satisfies the ecfs/. The Commission will not send a
control agency without any existing provisions of the Act. Thus, the Congressional Review Act (CRA)
CISWI or OSWI units in its state. This requirements of section 12(d) of the submission to Congress or the
action imposes no requirements beyond National Technology Transfer and Government Accountability Office
those imposed by the state. Accordingly, pursuant to the CRA, 5.U.S.C.
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
the Administrator certifies that this rule 801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
will not have a significant economic adopted by the Commission.
not impose an information collection
impact on a substantial number of small Subject: Amendment of parts 1 and 22
burden under the provisions of the
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility of the Commission’s Rules with Regard
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this to the Cellular Service, Including
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
rule pertains to pre-existing Changes in Licensing of Unserved Area,
requirements under state law and does List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 FCC 18–92, published at 83 FR 37760,
not impose any additional enforceable Environmental protection, August 2, 2018, in WT Docket No. 12–
duty beyond that required by state law, Administrative practice and procedure, 40. This document is being published
it does not contain any unfunded pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47
Air pollution control, Commercial and
mandate or significantly or uniquely CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
industrial solid waste incinerators,
affect small governments, as described Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
Intergovernmental relations, Other solid
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
waste incinerator units, Reporting and Federal Communications Commission.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule is not
recordkeeping requirements.
approved to apply on any Indian Marlene Dortch,
reservation land or in any other area Dated: September 13, 2018. Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
where EPA or an Indian tribe has Cathy Stepp, [FR Doc. 2018–20677 Filed 9–26–18; 8:45 am]
demonstrated that a tribe has Regional Administrator, Region 5. BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian [FR Doc. 2018–20967 Filed 9–26–18; 8:45 am]
country, the rule does not have tribal BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
governments or preempt tribal law as
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Federal Motor Carrier Safety
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
COMMISSION Administration
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
47 CFR Part 22 49 CFR Part 387
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states, [Docket No. FMCSA–2016–0102]
on the relationship between the national [WT Docket No. 12–40; Report No. 3102]
government and the states, or on the RIN 2126–AC10
Petition for Reconsideration of Action
distribution of power and in Rulemaking Proceeding
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
responsibilities among the various Broker and Freight Forwarder
levels of government, as specified in AGENCY: Federal Communications Financial Responsibility
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Commission. Federal Motor Carrier Safety
AGENCY:
August 10, 1999). This action merely ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
provides notice of receipt of negative
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
declarations, and does not alter the SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration
rulemaking (ANPRM); request for
relationship or the distribution of power (Petition) has been filed in the
comments.
and responsibilities established in the Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM 27SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_48965/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-27 01:04:22
Document Modified: 2018-09-27 01:04:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before October 29, 2018. | |
| Contact | Margaret Sieffert, Environmental Engineer, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (AT-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-1151, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 48777 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators; Intergovernmental Relations; Other Solid Waste Incinerator Units and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR