83 FR 4897 - Order Temporarily Denying Export Privileges
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 23 (February 2, 2018)
Bureau of Industry and Security
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 23 (February 2, 2018)
| Page Range | 4897-4899 | |
| FR Document | 2018-02067 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 4897-4899] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-02067] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security Order Temporarily Denying Export Privileges Gulnihal Yegane, Merkez Mah. Hasat Sok. No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; and Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbah[ccedil]e Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, Bah[ccedil]elievler, Istanbul, Turkey; and Egs Bloklari B-1 Blok K.1 No: 114, Yesilkoy Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey; and Huzur mah, Ayazaga Oyak sitesi, 9. Blok, No: 19, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; and Turgut Reis Mh. Glyimkent Kath Is Merk., K:4 D:4412, Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey; and Onucreis Mah. Giyimkent Sitesi, 3. Sokak No: 118, Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbah[ccedil]e Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, Bah[ccedil]elievler, Istanbul, Turkey; Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, Merkez Mah. Hasat Sok., No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi, Yesilce Mah. Dalgic SK., 3/101 Kagithane, Istanbul, Turkey 34000, Respondents. Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations (the ``Regulations'' or ``EAR''),\1\ the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS''), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (``OEE''), has requested the issuance of an Order temporarily denying, for a period of 180 days, the export privileges under the Regulations of: Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi (``Trigron Lojistik Kargo'' or ``Trigron''), Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi (``Ufuk Avia Lojistik''), and RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi (``RA Havacilik''). OEE's request and related information indicates that these parties are located in Turkey, at the respective addresses listed on the caption page of this order and on page 8, infra, and that Ms. Yegane owns or controls or is otherwise affiliated with Trigron Lojistik Kargo and the other companies at issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2017). The EAR issued under the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended 50 U.S.C. 4601-4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at http://uscode.house.gov) (``EAA'' or the ``Act''). Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 2017 (82 FR 39,005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 2010)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may issue an order temporarily denying a respondent's export privileges upon a showing that the order is necessary in the public interest to prevent an ``imminent violation'' of the Regulations. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and 766.24(d). ``A violation may be `imminent' either in time or degree of likelihood.'' 15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ``either that a violation is about to occur, or that the general circumstances of the matter under investigation or case under criminal or administrative charges demonstrate a likelihood of future violations.'' Id. As to the likelihood of future violations, BIS may show that the violation under investigation or charge ``is significant, deliberate, covert and/or likely to occur again, rather than technical or negligent[.]'' Id. A ``[l]ack of information establishing the precise time a violation may occur does not preclude a finding that a violation is imminent, so long as there is sufficient reason to believe the likelihood of a violation.'' Id. As referenced in OEE's request, Gulnihal Yegane was placed on BIS's Entity List, Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the Regulations, on December 12, 2013 (see 78 FR 75,463), for engaging in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. See 15 CFR 744.11. Ms. Yegane was, namely, one of 19 persons engaged in the development and operation of a procurement scheme that directly supported the operation of Iranian airline Mahan Airways. See 78 FR 75,463 (Dec. 12, 2013). Mahan Airways has been on BIS's Denied Persons List since March 2008, due to numerous significant, continuing, deliberate, and covert violations of the Regulations.\2\ In addition, since October 2011, it has been designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (``SDGT'') by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC'') pursuant to Executive Order 13224 for providing financial, material and technological support to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF). See 77 FR 64,427 (October 18, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Mahan Airways' status as a denied person was most recently renewed by BIS through a temporary denial order issued on December 20, 2017. See 82 FR 61,745 (Dec. 29, 2017). The December 20, 2017 renewal order summarizes the initial TDO issued against Mahan in March 2008, and the other renewal orders prior to December 20, 2017. See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in the temporary denial renewal orders issued by BIS against Mahan Airways in July 2013, and February 2014, OEE obtained evidence during 2013 indicating that Mahan Airways had been involved in efforts to unlawfully obtain a U.S.-origin GE CF6-50C2 aircraft engine via transshipment through Turkey. The evidence indicated that Mahan sought to obtain this U.S.-origin engine through Pioneer Logistics Havacilik Turizm Yonetim Danismanlik (``Pioneer Logistics''), a Turkish company involved in procuring and supplying aircraft parts, and its director/operator, Gulnihal Yegane. See Mahan Airways, et al., TDO Renewal Order dated January 24, 2014, (79 FR 4871 (Jan. 30, 2014)); Mahan Airways, et al., TDO Renewal Order dated July 31, 2013 (78 FR 48,138 (Aug. 72013)).\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ OFAC subsequently designated Pioneer Logistics as a SDGT, in doing so describing Pioneer Logistics as a key Mahan Airways front company that served as an intermediary for Mahan Airways, acting for or on behalf of Mahan by purchasing and receiving aviation-related materials. OFAC also stated that in an effort to help Mahan evade U.S. Government sanctions, Pioneer Logistics shipped aircraft parts to another U.S.-designated Mahan front company for onward delivery to Mahan, and that Mahan used Pioneer Logistics as a cutout for the repair and overhaul of aircraft parts and as a cutout to evade sanctions in order to purchase aircraft tires for its aircraft. See OFAC Press Release dated Aug. 29, 2014, copy at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl2618.aspx; 79 FR 55072 (Sept. 15, 2014)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 4898]] Ms. Yegane remains on the Entity List, and as a result of that listing, no item subject to the Regulations may be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to her without prior license authorization from BIS. See 15 CFR 744.11; Supp No. 4 to 15 CFR part 744. Moreover, BIS's review policy regarding such applications involving Ms. Yegane is a presumption of denial. Id. In its request, OEE has presented evidence indicating that Ms. Yegane and the other respondents are engaged in procurement activities relating to U.S.-origin aircraft engines and parts for or on behalf of one or more Iranian airlines, operating as transaction parties and/or facilitating transactions that are structured to evade the Regulations (as well as the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (``ITSR''), 31 CFR part 560, administered by OFAC) \4\ by routing unlicensed exports or reexports through Turkey to Iran. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Pursuant to Section 746.7(e) of the EAR, 15 CFR 746.7(e), no person may export or reexport any item that is subject to the EAR if such transaction is prohibited by the ITSR and has not been authorized by OFAC. The prohibition found in Section 746.7(e) applies whether or not the EAR require a license for the export or reexport in question. Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The evidence presented relates to transactions that occurred between at least September 2016, through at least December 2017. Specifically, in September 2016, Ufuk Avia Lojistik, with Ms. Yegane listed as its contact person, was identified in the consignee field on an air waybill for an unlicensed shipment of a CFM56-3C1 jet aircraft engine, engine serial number (``ESN'') 857203, from the United States to Turkey.\5\ The engine is used on Boeing 737 aircraft, and is subject to the Regulations and controlled for anti-terrorism reasons when exported to Iran, as described in Export Control Classification Number (``ECCN'') 9A991.d and pursuant to Section 742.8 of the EAR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Yegane's full or precise role at Ufuk Avia Lojistik is not entirely clear from the evidence, but there is some information indicating that she served as its general manager. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Documentation and correspondence relating to the transaction indicate that the engine was destined for sale or lease to an Iranian airline, contrary to what appeared on export paperwork. The U.S. Government was able to prevent this engine from being transshipped from Turkey on to Iran by returning the engine to the United States pursuant to a redelivery order issued by OEE under Section 758.8 of the Regulations on September 23, 2016. OEE's investigation also shows that, having been prevented from obtaining ESN 857203 for transshipment to Iran, Ms. Yegane was involved in efforts to obtain other CFM56-3C1 engines (ESNs 856772 and 857999) from the United States for that purpose between September 2016 and November 2016, with the transactions being re-structured and re-routed so that neither Ufuk Avia Lojistik nor Ms. Yegane would be listed in the transaction documents and another company listed as the consignee. The U.S. Government was able to thwart one of these intended transshipments to Iran, with BIS issuing a redelivery order on November 4, 2016, as to ESN 857999. Moreover, in January 2017, Ms. Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo, and RA Havacilik were involved in the transshipment of a CFM56-3C1 jet aircraft engine of unknown serial number, but believed to be subject to the EAR, to Iran. BIS's investigation has also showed that Trigron Lojistik Kargo is owned and operated by Ms. Yegane and has more recently been used, in conjunction with RA Havacilik, in the routing and attempted routing of shipments from the United States destined for transshipment to Iran via Turkey. The evidence presented by OEE indicates that RA Havacilik was formed on September 26, 2016, three days after BIS ordered the redelivery of ESN 857023. The evidence also suggests that Yegane and/or Trigron may own or control RA Havacilik; at the very least, the evidence indicates that they have been acting in concert to procure aircraft parts from the United States, items subject to the EAR (and the ITSR), for transshipment to Iran. BIS has uncovered several intended exports of such aircraft parts from the United States to RA Havacilik in December 2017, including, for example, gaskets and isolators used on Boeing aircraft. The evidence presented by OEE indicated that at least one of these December 2017 shipments from the United States was, in fact, transshipped on to Iran, contrary to the consignee and buyer information listed on the transaction paperwork. BIS detained other shipments. In sum, the facts and circumstances here and related evidence indicate a high likelihood of future violations of the Regulations and U.S. export control laws, including Ms. Yegane's previously-identified involvement in an aviation procurement network facilitating trade to Iran for or on behalf of Mahan Airways, a denied person (and SDGT); the repeated attempts to evade the long-standing and well-known U.S. embargo against Iran by obtaining and facilitating the acquisition of controlled jet aircraft engines and other aircraft parts from the United States for transshipment to Iran from at least September 2016, through at least December 2017; and the deliberate, covert, and determined nature of the misconduct and clear disregard for complying with U.S. export control laws. Accordingly, I find that the evidence presented by BIS demonstrates that a violation of the Regulations is imminent. As such, a temporary denial order (``TDO'') is needed to give notice to persons and companies in the United States and abroad that they should cease dealing with Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, and RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi in export or reexport transactions involving items subject to the EAR. Such a TDO is consistent with the public interest to preclude future violations of the Regulations. Accordingly, I find that an Order denying the export privileges of Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, and RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi is necessary, in the public interest, to prevent imminent violation of the Regulations. This Order is being issued on an ex parte basis without a hearing based upon BIS's showing of an imminent violation in accordance with Section 766.24 of the Regulations. It is therefore ordered: First, that GULNIHAL YEGANE, with an address at Merkez Mah. Hasat Sok., No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey, and at Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbah[ccedil]e Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, Bah[ccedil]elievler, Istanbul, Turkey, and at Egs Bloklari B-1 Blok K.1 No: 114, Yesilkoy Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey, and at Huzur mah, Ayazaga Oyak sitesi, 9. Blok, No: 19, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey, and at Turgut Reis Mh. Glyimkent Kath Is Merk. K:4 D:4412 Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey, and at Onucreis Mah. Giyimkent Sitesi 3. Sokak No:118 Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey; TRIGRON LOJISTIK KARGO LIMITED SIRKETI, with an address at Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbah[ccedil]e Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, Bah[ccedil]elievler, Istanbul, Turkey; UFUK AVIA LOJISTIK LIMITED SIRKETI, with an address at Merkez Mah. Hasat Sok., No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; and RA HAVACILIK LOJISTIK VE TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI, with an address at Yesilce Mah. Dalgic SK., 3/101 Kagithane, [[Page 4899]] Istanbul, Turkey 34000, and when acting for or on their behalf, any successors or assigns, agents, or employees (each a ``Denied Person'' and collectively the ``Denied Persons'') may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR''), or in any other activity subject to the EAR including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR. Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item subject to the EAR; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to the EAR that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to a Denied Person by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order. In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, Respondents Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, or RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022. In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not later than 20 days before the expiration date. Respondents Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, and RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi may oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission with the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, which must be received not later than seven days before the expiration date of the Order. A copy of this Order shall be served on Respondents and shall be published in the Federal Register. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect for 180 days. Dated: January 26, 2018. Kevin J. Kurland, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2018-02067 Filed 2-1-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Notices 4897
existing Sites 1, 2, 4 and 5 as ‘‘magnet’’ Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited Sirketi, Yesilce As referenced in OEE’s request,
sites and existing Site 6 as a usage- Mah. Dalgic SK., 3/101 Kagithane, Istanbul, Gulnihal Yegane was placed on BIS’s
driven site. No new subzones or usage- Turkey 34000, Respondents. Entity List, Supplement No. 4 to Part
driven sites are being requested at this Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the 744 of the Regulations, on December 12,
time. The application would have no Export Administration Regulations (the 2013 (see 78 FR 75,463), for engaging in
impact on FTZ 81’s previously activities contrary to the national
‘‘Regulations’’ or ‘‘EAR’’),1 the Bureau of
authorized subzones. security or foreign policy interests of the
Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S.
In accordance with the FTZ Board’s United States. See 15 CFR 744.11. Ms.
Department of Commerce, through its
regulations, Kathleen Boyce of the FTZ Yegane was, namely, one of 19 persons
Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’),
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate engaged in the development and
has requested the issuance of an Order
and analyze the facts and information operation of a procurement scheme that
temporarily denying, for a period of 180
presented in the application and case directly supported the operation of
days, the export privileges under the
record and to report findings and Iranian airline Mahan Airways. See 78
Regulations of: Gulnihal Yegane,
recommendations to the FTZ Board. FR 75,463 (Dec. 12, 2013). Mahan
Public comment is invited from Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi
Airways has been on BIS’s Denied
interested parties. Submissions shall be (‘‘Trigron Lojistik Kargo’’ or ‘‘Trigron’’), Persons List since March 2008, due to
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive Ufuk Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi numerous significant, continuing,
Secretary at the address below. The (‘‘Ufuk Avia Lojistik’’), and RA deliberate, and covert violations of the
closing period for their receipt is April Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Regulations.2 In addition, since October
3, 2018. Rebuttal comments in response Ticaret Limited Sirketi (‘‘RA 2011, it has been designated as a
to material submitted during the Havacilik’’). OEE’s request and related Specially Designated Global Terrorist
foregoing period may be submitted information indicates that these parties (‘‘SDGT’’) by the Treasury Department’s
during the subsequent 15-day period to are located in Turkey, at the respective Office of Foreign Assets Control
April 18, 2018. addresses listed on the caption page of (‘‘OFAC’’) pursuant to Executive Order
A copy of the application will be this order and on page 8, infra, and that 13224 for providing financial, material
available for public inspection at the Ms. Yegane owns or controls or is and technological support to Iran’s
Office of the Executive Secretary, otherwise affiliated with Trigron Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room Lojistik Kargo and the other companies Qods Force (IRGC–QF). See 77 FR
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, at issue. 64,427 (October 18, 2011).
1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may As discussed in the temporary denial
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the issue an order temporarily denying a renewal orders issued by BIS against
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ respondent’s export privileges upon a Mahan Airways in July 2013, and
Board’s website, which is accessible via showing that the order is necessary in February 2014, OEE obtained evidence
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further the public interest to prevent an during 2013 indicating that Mahan
information, contact Kathleen Boyce at ‘‘imminent violation’’ of the Airways had been involved in efforts to
Kathleen.Boyce@trade.gov or (202) 482– Regulations. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and unlawfully obtain a U.S.-origin GE CF6–
1346. 766.24(d). ‘‘A violation may be 50C2 aircraft engine via transshipment
‘imminent’ either in time or degree of through Turkey. The evidence indicated
Dated: January 30, 2018.
likelihood.’’ 15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). BIS that Mahan sought to obtain this U.S.-
Elizabeth Whiteman,
may show ‘‘either that a violation is origin engine through Pioneer Logistics
Acting Executive Secretary. Havacilik Turizm Yonetim Danismanlik
about to occur, or that the general
[FR Doc. 2018–02105 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am] (‘‘Pioneer Logistics’’), a Turkish
circumstances of the matter under
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
investigation or case under criminal or company involved in procuring and
administrative charges demonstrate a supplying aircraft parts, and its director/
likelihood of future violations.’’ Id. As operator, Gulnihal Yegane. See Mahan
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Airways, et al., TDO Renewal Order
to the likelihood of future violations,
BIS may show that the violation under dated January 24, 2014, (79 FR 4871
Bureau of Industry and Security
investigation or charge ‘‘is significant, (Jan. 30, 2014)); Mahan Airways, et al.,
Order Temporarily Denying Export deliberate, covert and/or likely to occur TDO Renewal Order dated July 31, 2013
Privileges again, rather than technical or (78 FR 48,138 (Aug. 72013)).3
negligent[.]’’ Id. A ‘‘[l]ack of information
Gulnihal Yegane, Merkez Mah. Hasat Sok. establishing the precise time a violation
2 Mahan Airways’ status as a denied person was
No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; and most recently renewed by BIS through a temporary
Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbahçe may occur does not preclude a finding denial order issued on December 20, 2017. See 82
Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, that a violation is imminent, so long as FR 61,745 (Dec. 29, 2017). The December 20, 2017
Bahçelievler, Istanbul, Turkey; and Egs there is sufficient reason to believe the renewal order summarizes the initial TDO issued
against Mahan in March 2008, and the other
Bloklari B–1 Blok K.1 No: 114, Yesilkoy likelihood of a violation.’’ Id. renewal orders prior to December 20, 2017. See id.
Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey; and Huzur 3 OFAC subsequently designated Pioneer
mah, Ayazaga Oyak sitesi, 9. Blok, No: 19, 1 The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR parts Logistics as a SDGT, in doing so describing Pioneer
Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey; and Turgut Reis 730–774 (2017). The EAR issued under the Export Logistics as a key Mahan Airways front company
Mh. Glyimkent Kath Is Merk., K:4 D:4412, Administration Act of 1979, as amended 50 U.S.C. that served as an intermediary for Mahan Airways,
Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey; and Onucreis 4601–4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at http:// acting for or on behalf of Mahan by purchasing and
Mah. Giyimkent Sitesi, 3. Sokak No: 118, uscode.house.gov) (‘‘EAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’). Since receiving aviation-related materials. OFAC also
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Esenler/Istanbul, Turkey August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the stated that in an effort to help Mahan evade U.S.
Trigron Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, President, through Executive Order 13222 of August Government sanctions, Pioneer Logistics shipped
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which aircraft parts to another U.S.-designated Mahan
Yanibosna Merkez Mah., Degirmenbahçe
has been extended by successive Presidential front company for onward delivery to Mahan, and
Cad. No. 11, Airport Hill Sitesi Blok D.6, Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, that Mahan used Pioneer Logistics as a cutout for
Bahçelievler, Istanbul, Turkey; Ufuk Avia 2017 (82 FR 39,005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued the repair and overhaul of aircraft parts and as a
Lojistik Limited Sirketi, Merkez Mah. the Regulations in effect under the International cutout to evade sanctions in order to purchase
Hasat Sok., No: 52/6, Sisli, Istanbul, Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, aircraft tires for its aircraft. See OFAC Press Release
Turkey; RA Havacilik Lojistik Ve et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 2010)). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Feb 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM 02FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_4920/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Notices 4899
Istanbul, Turkey 34000, and when purposes of this paragraph, servicing DATES: Applicable February 2, 2018.
acting for or on their behalf, any means installation, maintenance, repair, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
successors or assigns, agents, or modification or testing. Katherine Johnson at (202) 482–4929 or
employees (each a ‘‘Denied Person’’ and Third, that, after notice and Renato Barreda at (202) 482–0317 (the
collectively the ‘‘Denied Persons’’) may opportunity for comment as provided in People’s Republic of China (China)), and
not, directly or indirectly, participate in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other Denisa Ursu at (202) 482–2285 or
any way in any transaction involving person, firm, corporation, or business Michael Bowen at (202) 482–0768
any commodity, software or technology organization related to a Denied Person (Italy), Robert Palmer at (202) 482–9068
(hereinafter collectively referred to as by affiliation, ownership, control, or (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations, Office
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from position of responsibility in the conduct VIII, Enforcement and Compliance,
the United States that is subject to the of trade or related services may also be International Trade Administration,
Export Administration Regulations made subject to the provisions of this U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject Order. Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
to the EAR including, but not limited to: In accordance with the provisions of DC 20230.
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
any license, License Exception, or Respondents Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron
export control document; Lojistik Kargo Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Background
B. Carrying on negotiations Avia Lojistik Limited Sirketi, or RA On October 25, 2017, the Department
concerning, or ordering, buying, Havacilik Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik of Commerce (Commerce) initiated less-
receiving, using, selling, delivering, Ticaret Limited Sirketi may, at any time, than-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of
storing, disposing of, forwarding, appeal this Order by filing a full written imports of forged steel fittings from
transporting, financing, or otherwise statement in support of the appeal with China, Italy and Taiwan.1 Currently, the
servicing in any way, any transaction the Office of the Administrative Law preliminary determinations are due no
involving any item exported or to be Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing later than March 14, 2018.
exported from the United States that is Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
subject to the EAR, or in any other Postponement of Preliminary
Maryland 21202–4022. Determinations
activity subject to the EAR; or In accordance with the provisions of
C. Benefitting in any way from any Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
transaction involving any item exported seek renewal of this Order by filing a of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
or to be exported from the United States written request not later than 20 days Commerce to issue the preliminary
that is subject to the EAR, or in any before the expiration date. Respondents determination in an LTFV investigation
other activity subject to the EAR. Gulnihal Yegane, Trigron Lojistik Kargo within 140 days after the date on which
Second, that no person may, directly Limited Sirketi, Ufuk Avia Lojistik Commerce initiated the investigation.
or indirectly, do any of the following: Limited Sirketi, and RA Havacilik However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf permits Commerce to postpone the
Lojistik Ve Tasimacilik Ticaret Limited
of a Denied Person any item subject to preliminary determination until no later
Sirketi may oppose a request to renew
the EAR; than 190 days after the date on which
B. Take any action that facilitates the this Order by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary for Export Commerce initiated the investigation if:
acquisition or attempted acquisition by (A) The petitioner makes a timely
a Denied Person of the ownership, Enforcement, which must be received
not later than seven days before the request for a postponement; or (B)
possession, or control of any item Commerce concludes that the parties
subject to the EAR that has been or will expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served concerned are cooperating, that the
be exported from the United States, investigation is extraordinarily
including financing or other support on Respondents and shall be published
in the Federal Register. complicated, and that additional time is
activities related to a transaction necessary to make a preliminary
whereby a Denied Person acquires or This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect for 180 days. determination. Under 19 CFR
attempts to acquire such ownership, 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a
possession or control; Dated: January 26, 2018. request for postponement 25 days or
C. Take any action to acquire from or Kevin J. Kurland, more before the scheduled date of the
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of preliminary determination and must
acquisition from a Denied Person of any Commerce for Export Enforcement. state the reasons for the request.
item subject to the EAR that has been [FR Doc. 2018–02067 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am] Commerce will grant the request unless
exported from the United States; BILLING CODE P it finds compelling reasons to deny the
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the request. See 19 CFR 351.205(e).
United States any item subject to the On January 10, 2018, the petitioners 2
EAR with knowledge or reason to know DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE submitted a timely request that
that the item will be, or is intended to Commerce postpone the preliminary
be, exported from the United States; or International Trade Administration determinations in these LTFV
E. Engage in any transaction to service investigations. The petitioners stated
any item subject to the EAR that has [A–570–067, A–475–839, and A–583–863]
that they request postponement because
been or will be exported from the Forged Steel Fittings From the under the current issue date for the
United States and which is owned,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
People’s Republic of China, Italy, and
possessed or controlled by a Denied Taiwan: Postponement of Preliminary 1 See Forged Steel Fittings from the People’s
Person, or service any item, of whatever Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair- Republic of China, Italy, and Taiwan: Initiation of
origin, that is owned, possessed or Value Investigations
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 82 FR 50614
controlled by a Denied Person if such (November 1, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
2 The petitioners are Bonney Forge Corporation
service involves the use of any item AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
subject to the EAR that has been or will International Trade Administration, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and
be exported from the United States. For Department of Commerce. Service Workers International Union (USW).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Feb 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM 02FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_4920/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-03 14:27:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-03 14:27:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 4897 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR