83 FR 49139 - Proposed Revisions to Standard Review Plan Section 2.5.3, Surface Deformation
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 189 (September 28, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 189 (September 28, 2018)
| Page Range | 49139-49141 | |
| FR Document | 2018-21165 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 49139-49141] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-21165] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2018-0178] Proposed Revisions to Standard Review Plan Section 2.5.3, Surface Deformation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Standard review plan-draft section revision; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting public comment on draft NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition,'' Section 2.5.3, ``Surface Deformation.'' SRP Section 2.5.3, Surface Deformation, was last updated in 2014. This proposed update to the SRP focuses on risk-informing the staff's review in this area on the potential for tectonic or non-tectonic surface deformation that could adversely affect the safe operation of a nuclear power plant at the proposed site. DATES: Comments must be filed no later than October 29, 2018. Comments received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0178. Address questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287- 9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: May Ma, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Notich, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-3053; email: [email protected]; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0178 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0178. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The draft revision and current revision to NUREG-0800, Section 2.5.3, ``Surface Deformation'' are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML18183A044 and ML13316C064, respectively. The redline-strikeout version comparing the draft Revision 6 and the current version of Revision 5 is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML18267A203. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2018-0178 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov and enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that [[Page 49140]] they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Background In the area of geology, seismology, and geotechnical engineering, section 100.23(c) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) requires, in part, that applicants for a construction permit, operating license, early site permit, or combined license evaluate the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation at a site. Therefore, the consideration of information related to the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation is important to the staff review guidance in SRP Section 2.5.3. Since the last update to SRP Section 2.5.3 in 2014, the staff completed review of licensee submittals of reevaluated seismic hazards in response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) information requests that were sent to licensees after the near-term task force review of the Fukushima Dai- ichi accident (ADAMS Accession No. ML12056A046). In addition to reviewing the hazard reevaluations for the operating reactor fleet submitted in response to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) information requests, the NRC staff remained actively engaged in several ESP and COL application reviews for new power reactors. In connection with those reviews, ESP and COL applicants evaluated the potential for tectonic and non- tectonic surface deformation consistent with the guidance found in the SRP. One of the lessons-learned from the 10 CFR 50.54(f) information reviews and the reviews for new power reactors was that a risk-informed focus on hazards most likely to affect a site would be appropriate for the consideration of the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation at a site. III. Discussion of Update Rationale Staff's 2018 Update Philosophy Consistent with the Commission's approach to risk-informed regulation, the staff proposes that SRP Section 2.5.3 be simplified to focus the review on the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation that could adversely affect the safe operation of a nuclear power plant at the proposed site. Since the 2014 update to SRP Section 2.5.3, the staff completed the review of licensee submittals of reevaluated seismic hazards in response to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) information request regarding the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident in 2011. A risk- informed focus was successfully used for the 10 CFR 50.54(f) flooding reviews and allowed licensees to focus the reevaluation on those hazards that are most likely to impact the site and adversely affect SSCs important to safety. Using this approach, licensees provided a brief explanation of why a particular hazard does not affect the site and a more detailed evaluation for those hazards that could adversely affect the safe operation of the plant. Due to its success, this risk- informed approach is being incorporated into various sections of the SRP. Upon review of the various causes of surface deformation described in SRP Section 2.5.3, the staff proposes that only the mechanisms that could adversely affect the functionality of the SSCs important to safety need to be described in detail in future license applications. Applicants would still be expected to perform their due diligence and consider the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation identified in SRP Section 2.5.3 against the applicable siting criteria in 10 CFR part 100, but the staff proposes that the applicant's level of detail be focused on the potential for tectonic and non-tectonic surface deformation most likely to impact the site and adversely affect SSCs important to safety. Specific Changes to SRP Section 2.5.3 Changes to SRP Section 2.5.3 include technical editing, as appropriate, to improve the readability of the various SRP subsections as well as to better convey lessons-learned from the recent 10 CFR 50.54(f) reviews. The term ``safety-related SSCs'' is replaced with the term ``SSCs important to safety'' to better align with the regulatory terminology in 10 CFR parts 50 and 54. The references in SRP Section 2.5.3 were also updated, deleted or added, as appropriate. Technical changes to SRP Section 2.5.3 include the addition of anthropogenic activities as a possible cause of non-tectonic surface deformation and the aforementioned focused review of those causes of surface deformation that could adversely affect the safe operation of a nuclear power plant at the proposed site. Similar to the 2014 update to SRP 2.5.3, the risk-informed approach to the 2018 update focuses on the distinction between the different types of surface deformation, primarily tectonic and non-tectonic deformation. Surface deformation includes non-tectonic deformation due to dissolution, salt diapirism, and anthropogenic activities, such as mine collapse. The addition of anthropogenic activities as a potential source of non-tectonic surface deformation is in keeping with recognized mechanisms of non-tectonic deformation that could potentially affect a proposed nuclear power plant site. The acceptance review section was also revised to reflect the changes made to the Office of New Reactors' (NRO) office instruction related to acceptance reviews. IV. Further Information The NRC seeks public comment on the proposed draft section revision of SRP Section 2.5.3. The changes to SRP Chapter 2 reflect the current staff reviews, methods, and practices based on lessons learned from the NRC's reviews of design certification and combined license applications completed since the last revision of this chapter. The draft SRP section would also provide guidance for reviewing an application for a combined license under 10 CFR part 52. Following NRC staff evaluation of public comments, the NRC intends to finalize SRP Section 2.5.3 in ADAMS and post it on the NRC's public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The SRP is guidance for the NRC staff. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC regulations, and compliance with the SRP is not required. V. Backfitting and Issue Finality Issuance of this draft SRP section, if finalized, would not constitute backfitting as defined in 10 CFR 50.109, (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The NRC's position is based upon the following considerations. 1. The SRP positions do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the SRP is guidance directed to the NRC staff with respect to its regulatory responsibilities. The SRP provides guidance to the NRC staff on how to review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of licensing. Changes in guidance intended for use by only the staff are not matters that constitute backfitting as that term is defined in 10 CFR 50.109(a)(1) or involve the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52. 2. Backfitting and issue finality--with certain exceptions discussed below--do not apply to current or future applicants. Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain exceptions, the subject of either the Backfit Rule or any [[Page 49141]] issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52. This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52 were intended to apply to every NRC action that substantially changes the expectations of current and future applicants. The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever a 10 CFR part 50 operating license applicant references a construction permit or a 10 CFR part 52 combined license applicant references a license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or an NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule) for which specified issue finality provisions apply. The NRC staff does not currently intend to impose the positions represented in this draft SRP section in a manner that constitutes backfitting or is inconsistent with any issue finality provision of 10 CFR part 52. If in the future the NRC staff seeks to impose positions stated in this draft SRP section in a manner that would constitute backfitting or be inconsistent with these issue finality provisions, the NRC staff must make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule or address the regulatory criteria set forth in the applicable issue finality provision, as applicable, that would allow the staff to impose the position. 3. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on existing nuclear power plant licensees either now or in the future (absent a voluntary request for a change from the licensee, holder of a regulatory approval or a design certification applicant). The NRC staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions described in this draft SRP section to existing (already issued) licenses (e.g., operating licenses and combined licenses) and regulatory approvals. Hence, the issuance of this SRP guidance--even if considered guidance subject to the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52--would not need to be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as being inconsistent with these issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the NRC staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP on holders of already issued licenses in a manner that would constitute backfitting or does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must make a showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule or address the criteria set forth in the applicable issue finality provision, as applicable, that would allow the staff to impose the position. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, on September 25, 2018. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jennivine K. Rankin, Acting Chief, Licensing Branch 3, Division of Licensing, Siting and Environmental Analysis, Office of New Reactors. [FR Doc. 2018-21165 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Notices 49139
Components).’’ The Subcommittee will Dated: September 21, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
hear presentations by and hold Mark L. Banks, Mark D. Notich, Office of New Reactors,
discussions with the NRC staff and Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory telephone: 301–415–3053; email:
other interested persons regarding this Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Mark.Notich@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear
matter. The Subcommittee will gather [FR Doc. 2018–21120 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am] Regulatory Commission, Washington,
information, analyze relevant issues and BILLING CODE 7590–01–P DC 20555–0001.
facts, and formulate proposed positions SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and actions, as appropriate. This
NUCLEAR REGULATORY I. Obtaining Information and
briefing is independent of the ACRS
COMMISSION Submitting Comments
Research Quality Review.
Members of the public desiring to A. Obtaining Information
provide oral statements and/or written [NRC–2018–0178] Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
comments should notify the Designated 0178 when contacting the NRC about
Proposed Revisions to Standard
Federal Official (DFO), Girija Shukla the availability of information for this
Review Plan Section 2.5.3, Surface
(Telephone 301–415–5844 or Email: action. You may obtain publicly-
Deformation
Girija.Shukla@nrc.gov) five days prior to available information related to this
the meeting, if possible, so that AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory action by any of the following methods:
appropriate arrangements can be made. Commission. • Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
Thirty-five hard copies of each ACTION: Standard review plan-draft
http://www.regulations.gov and search
presentation or handout should be section revision; request for comment. for Docket ID NRC–2018–0178.
provided to the DFO thirty minutes • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
before the meeting. In addition, one SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Access and Management System
electronic copy of each presentation Commission (NRC) is soliciting public (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-
should be emailed to the DFO one day comment on draft NUREG–0800, available documents online in the
before the meeting. If an electronic copy ‘‘Standard Review Plan for the Review ADAMS Public Documents collection at
cannot be provided within this of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
timeframe, presenters should provide Power Plants: LWR Edition,’’ Section adams.html. To begin the search, select
the DFO with a CD containing each 2.5.3, ‘‘Surface Deformation.’’ SRP ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
presentation at least thirty minutes Section 2.5.3, Surface Deformation, was select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
before the meeting. Electronic last updated in 2014. This proposed Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
update to the SRP focuses on risk- please contact the NRC’s Public
recordings will be permitted only
informing the staff’s review in this area Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
during those portions of the meeting
on the potential for tectonic or non- 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
that are open to the public. The public
tectonic surface deformation that could email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft
bridgeline number for the meeting is
adversely affect the safe operation of a revision and current revision to
866–822–3032, passcode 8272423.
nuclear power plant at the proposed NUREG–0800, Section 2.5.3, ‘‘Surface
Detailed procedures for the conduct of Deformation’’ are available in ADAMS
and participation in ACRS meetings site.
under Accession Nos. ML18183A044
were published in the Federal Register DATES: Comments must be filed no later and ML13316C064, respectively. The
on October 4, 2017 (82 FR 46312). than October 29, 2018. Comments redline-strikeout version comparing the
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting received after this date will be draft Revision 6 and the current version
transcripts are available on the NRC considered, if it is practical to do so, but of Revision 5 is available in ADAMS
website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- the Commission is able to ensure under Accession No. ML18267A203.
rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information consideration only for comments • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
regarding topics to be discussed, received on or before this date. purchase copies of public documents at
changes to the agenda, whether the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
meeting has been canceled or by any of the following methods: White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
rescheduled, and the time allotted to • Federal Rulemaking website: Go to Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
present oral statements can be obtained http://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0178. Address B. Submitting Comments
from the website cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO. questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Please include Docket ID NRC–2018–
Moreover, in view of the possibility that Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127; 0178 in your comment submission.
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For The NRC cautions you not to include
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary technical questions, contact the identifying or contact information that
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, individual listed in the FOR FURTHER you do not want to be publicly
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this disclosed in your comment submission.
persons planning to attend should check
document. The NRC will post all comment
with these references if such
• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office submissions at http://
rescheduling would result in a major
of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7– www.regulations.gov and enter the
inconvenience.
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory comment submissions into ADAMS.
If attending this meeting, please enter Commission, Washington, DC 20555– The NRC does not routinely edit
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
through the One White Flint North 0001. comment submissions to remove
building, 11555 Rockville Pike, For additional direction on obtaining identifying or contact information.
Rockville, Maryland. After registering information and submitting comments, If you are requesting or aggregating
with Security, please contact Mr. see ‘‘Obtaining Information and comments from other persons for
Theron Brown (Telephone 301–415– Submitting Comments’’ in the submission to the NRC, then you should
6702 or 301–415–8066) to be escorted to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of inform those persons not to include
the meeting room. this document. identifying or contact information that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:22 Sep 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_49328/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Notices 49141
issue finality provisions under 10 CFR Dated at Rockville, Maryland, on modifications, and other associated
part 52. This is because neither the September 25, 2018. materials.3
Backfit Rule nor the issue finality For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Postal Service’s proposed
provisions of 10 CFR part 52 were Jennivine K. Rankin, modifications focus on accurately
intended to apply to every NRC action Acting Chief, Licensing Branch 3, Division describing procedures in regard to
that substantially changes the of Licensing, Siting and Environmental ‘‘Non-Airlift Days.’’ These are typically
expectations of current and future Analysis, Office of New Reactors. days before a non-Monday holiday
applicants. [FR Doc. 2018–21165 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am] where air transportation is limited on
The exceptions to the general BILLING CODE 7590–01–P the day of mail induction (the day
before the holiday) or the following day
principle are applicable whenever a 10
(the day of the holiday). Notice at 1. The
CFR part 50 operating license applicant
Postal Service proposes to modify its
references a construction permit or a 10
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION service performance measurement plan
CFR part 52 combined license applicant
for mailpieces that are dropped at a
references a license (e.g., an early site
[Docket No. PI2018–2; Order No. 4828] collection box, business mail chute, or
permit) and/or an NRC regulatory
Post Office location on a Non-Airlift Day
approval (e.g., a design certification Public Inquiry on Service Performance to start-the-clock on measurement on
rule) for which specified issue finality Measurement Systems the date of the following applicable
provisions apply.
acceptance day. Id. at 2.
The NRC staff does not currently AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. Other proposed modifications focus
intend to impose the positions ACTION: Notice. on correcting areas of the service
represented in this draft SRP section in performance measurement plan to
a manner that constitutes backfitting or SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a reflect current operations. These include
is inconsistent with any issue finality recently filed Postal Service request removing references to certain parcels
provision of 10 CFR part 52. If in the proposing modifications to its market products that were recently moved from
future the NRC staff seeks to impose dominant service performance the market dominant to the competitive
positions stated in this draft SRP section measurement systems. This document category, a product name change, and
in a manner that would constitute informs the public of this proceeding other applicable updates.
backfitting or be inconsistent with these and the technical conference, invites Interested persons are invited to
issue finality provisions, the NRC staff public comment, and takes other comment on any or all aspects of the
must make the showing as set forth in administrative steps. Postal Service’s proposed modifications
the Backfit Rule or address the DATES: Comments are due: October 12, concerning the service performance
regulatory criteria set forth in the 2018. measurement systems. Comments are
applicable issue finality provision, as ADDRESSES: Submit comments due October 12, 2018. The Commission
applicable, that would allow the staff to electronically via the Commission’s does not anticipate the need for reply
impose the position. Filing Online system at http:// comments at this time. The Commission
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit intends to evaluate the comments
3. The NRC staff has no intention to
comments electronically should contact received and use those suggestions to
impose the SRP positions on existing
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER help carry out its service performance
nuclear power plant licensees either
INFORMATION CONTACT section by measurement responsibilities under the
now or in the future (absent a voluntary
telephone for advice on filing Postal Accountability and Enhancement
request for a change from the licensee,
alternatives. Act. Material filed in this docket will be
holder of a regulatory approval or a
available for review on the
design certification applicant). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commission’s website, http://
The NRC staff does not intend to David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at www.prc.gov.
impose or apply the positions described 202–789–6820. It is ordered:
in this draft SRP section to existing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 1. Docket No. PI2018–2 is established
(already issued) licenses (e.g., operating September 20, 2018, the Postal Service for the purpose of considering the Postal
licenses and combined licenses) and filed a notice, pursuant to 39 CFR Service’s proposed modifications to its
regulatory approvals. Hence, the 3055.5, proposing modifications to its market dominant service performance
issuance of this SRP guidance—even if market dominant service performance measurement systems.
considered guidance subject to the measurement systems.1 The systems 2. Interested persons may submit
Backfit Rule or the issue finality that are the subject of this proceeding written comments on any or all aspects
provisions in 10 CFR part 52—would were recently approved for of the Postal Service’s proposals no later
not need to be evaluated as if it were a implementation on July 5, 2018, in than October 12, 2018.
backfit or as being inconsistent with Docket No. PI2015–1.2 Accompanying 3. Lyudmila Y. Bzhilyanskaya is
these issue finality provisions. If, in the the Notice is a library reference, which designated to represent the interests of
future, the NRC staff seeks to impose a contains a copy of the United States the general public in this docket.
position in the SRP on holders of Postal Service, Service Performance 4. The Secretary shall arrange for
already issued licenses in a manner that Measurement plan, revised September publication of this Notice in the Federal
would constitute backfitting or does not 20, 2018 (both redline and clean Register.
provide issue finality as described in the versions), a chart outlining the proposed By the Commission.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
applicable issue finality provision, then Stacy L. Ruble,
the staff must make a showing as set 1 United States Postal Service Notice of Service Secretary.
forth in the Backfit Rule or address the Performance Measurement System Modification, [FR Doc. 2018–21136 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am]
criteria set forth in the applicable issue September 20, 2018 (Notice).
2 Docket No. PI2015–1, Order Approving Use of BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
finality provision, as applicable, that Internal Measurement Systems, July 5, 2018; Docket
would allow the staff to impose the No. PI2015–1, Docket No. PI2015–1, Errata to Order 3 Library Reference USPS–LR–PI2018–2/1,
position. No. 4697, August 21, 2018. September 20, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:22 Sep 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_49328/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-09-28 01:22:58
Document Modified: 2018-09-28 01:22:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Standard review plan-draft section revision; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Comments must be filed no later than October 29, 2018. Comments received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. | |
| Contact | Mark D. Notich, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-3053; email: [email protected]; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 49139 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR