83 FR 50262 - Safety Zone; APA Convention Fireworks; Lake Erie, Cleveland, OH

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 194 (October 5, 2018)

Page Range		50262-50264
FR Document		2018-21717

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters within a 420-foot radius of the launch site at 101 Erieside Avenue, Cleveland, OH. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Lake Erie during the APA 70th Anniversary Convention fireworks displays. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Buffalo.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 194 (Friday, October 5, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50262-50264]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0893]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; APA Convention Fireworks; Lake Erie, Cleveland, OH

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters within a 420-foot radius of the launch site at 101 
Erieside Avenue, Cleveland, OH. This safety zone is intended to 
restrict vessels from a portion of Lake Erie during the APA 70th 
Anniversary Convention fireworks displays. This temporary safety zone 
is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational 
hazards associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or 
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Sector Buffalo.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 9 a.m. on 
October 5, 2018 until 10:45 p.m. on October 5, 2018. For the purposes 
of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 9:15 p.m. October 3, 
2018, until 9 a.m. on October 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0893 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LT Ryan Junod, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast 
Guard Marine Safety Unit Cleveland; telephone 216-937-0124, email 
ryan.s.junod@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause find that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because the event sponsor did not submit 
notice to the Coast Guard with sufficient time remaining before the 
event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this 
rule to wait for a comment period to run would be contrary to the 
public interest by inhibiting the Coast Guard's ability to protect 
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a maritime 
fireworks display.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because doing so would be 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Delaying the 
effective date would be contrary to the rule's objectives of ensuring 
safety of life on the navigable waters and protection of persons and 
vessels near the maritime fireworks display.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo, NY (COTP) has determined that a 
fireworks display presents significant risks to the public safety and 
property. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations, 
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris. This rule is 
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the 
navigable waters within the safety zone while the fireworks display 
takes place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 9:15 p.m. through 10:15 
p.m. on October 3, 2018, and 9:45 p.m. through 10:45 p.m. on October 5, 
2018. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters within a 420-foot 
radius of: 41[deg]30'33.4'' N, 081[deg]41'58.0'' W at 101 Erieside 
Avenue, Cleveland, OH.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on our anticipation 
that it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere 
with other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant 
or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy 
issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small 
and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the safety zone is 
designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, the 
safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to transit around it. 
Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular area are 
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may 
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of 
the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small

[[Page 50263]]

businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned 
and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental 
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard 
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
a safety zone lasting one hour that will prohibit entry within 420 feet 
of the launch area for the fireworks display. It is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, 
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0893 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0893  Safety Zone; APA Convention Fireworks; Lake Erie, 
Cleveland, OH.

    (a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters Lake Erie, 
Cleveland, OH contained within a 420-foot radius of the fireworks 
launch site located at position 41[deg]30'33. 4'' N, 081[deg]41'58.0'' 
W.
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This regulation will be 
enforced from 9:15 p.m. until 10:15 p.m., October 3, 2018, and from 
9:45 p.m. until 10:45 p.m. on October 5, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo 
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.


[[Page 50264]]


    Dated: October 2, 2018.
Joseph S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018-21717 Filed 10-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50263

businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this rule does not have tribal List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
that are independently owned and implications under Executive Order
operated and are not dominant in their 13175, Consultation and Coordination Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with Indian Tribal Governments, (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial requirements, Security measures,
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian Waterways.
605(b) that this rule will not have a tribes, on the relationship between the For the reasons discussed in the
significant economic impact on a Federal Government and Indian tribes, preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
substantial number of small entities. or on the distribution of power and CFR part 165 as follows:
While some owners or operators of responsibilities between the Federal
vessels intending to transit the safety Government and Indian tribes. If you PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
zone may be small entities, for the believe this rule has implications for AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
reasons stated in section V.A above, this federalism or Indian tribes, please
rule will not have a significant contact the person listed in the FOR ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
economic impact on any vessel owner FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section continues to read as follows:
or operator. above. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Under section 213(a) of the Small 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Business Regulatory Enforcement E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Department of Homeland Security Delegation
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), No. 0170.1.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
we want to assist small entities in of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0893 to read as
understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of follows:
would affect your small business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
organization, or governmental § 165.T09–0893 Safety Zone; APA
particular, the Act addresses actions Convention Fireworks; Lake Erie,
jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a
concerning its provisions or options for Cleveland, OH.
State, local, or tribal government, in the
compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of (a) Location. This zone will
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or encompass all waters Lake Erie,
CONTACT section. Cleveland, OH contained within a 420-
more in any one year. Though this rule
Small businesses may send comments will not result in such an expenditure, foot radius of the fireworks launch site
on the actions of Federal employees we do discuss the effects of this rule located at position 41°30′33. 4″ N,
who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble. 081°41′58.0″ W.
compliance with, Federal regulations to (b) Effective and enforcement period.
the Small Business and Agriculture F. Environment This regulation will be enforced from
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 9:15 p.m. until 10:15 p.m., October 3,
and the Regional Small Business We have analyzed this rule under
2018, and from 9:45 p.m. until 10:45
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Department of Homeland Security
p.m. on October 5, 2018.
Ombudsman evaluates these actions Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
annually and rates each agency’s the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
responsiveness to small business. If you Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of into, transiting, or anchoring within this
wish to comment on actions by safety zone is prohibited unless
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a authorized by the Captain of the Port
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Buffalo or his designated on-scene
Coast Guard will not retaliate against category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a representative.
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action significant effect on the human (2) This safety zone is closed to all
of the Coast Guard. environment. This rule involves a safety vessel traffic, except as may be
zone lasting one hour that will prohibit permitted by the Captain of the Port
C. Collection of Information entry within 420 feet of the launch area Buffalo or his designated on-scene
This rule will not call for a new for the fireworks display. It is representative.
collection of information under the categorically excluded from further (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 review under paragraph L60(a) of the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A petty officer who has been designated
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Record of Environmental Consideration by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
Governments supporting this determination is on his behalf.
A rule has implications for federalism available in the docket where indicated (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
under Executive Order 13132, under ADDRESSES. or operate within the safety zone shall
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct G. Protest Activities contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
effect on the States, on the relationship or his on-scene representative to obtain
between the national government and The Coast Guard respects the First permission to do so. The Captain of the
the States, or on the distribution of Amendment rights of protesters. Port Buffalo or his on-scene
power and responsibilities among the Protesters are asked to contact the representative may be contacted via
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

various levels of government. We have person listed in the FOR FURTHER VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
analyzed this rule under that Order and INFORMATION CONTACT section to permission to enter or operate in the
have determined that it is consistent coordinate protest activities so that your safety zone must comply with all
with the fundamental federalism message can be received without directions given to them by the Captain
principles and preemption requirements jeopardizing the safety or security of of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
described in Executive Order 13132. people, places or vessels. representative.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1

50264 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: October 2, 2018. I. Background 2016-08/documents/good-neighbor-
Joseph S. Dufresne, On November 17, 2015, the State of memo_implementation.pdf (the 2016
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the West Virginia, through the West PM2.5 Memorandum). This 2016 PM2.5
Port Buffalo. Virginia Department of Environmental Memorandum is included in the docket
[FR Doc. 2018–21717 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am] Protection (WVDEP), submitted a SIP for this rulemaking action. After
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P revision addressing all required considering the 2016 PM2.5
infrastructure elements under CAA Memorandum and additional
section 110(a) for the 2012 PM2.5 information, EPA came to the same
NAAQS. As stated in the notice of conclusion as West Virginia and
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published proposed in the NPRM that West
AGENCY Virginia’s emissions do not significantly
on August 3, 2018, EPA has previously
contribute to nonattainment or interfere
taken action on other portions of the
40 CFR Part 52 with maintenance in another State with
November 17, 2015 submittal
respect to the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
addressing requirements in CAA section A detailed summary of West
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0373; FRL–9984–96– 110(a)(2) for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS,
Region 3] Virginia’s submittal, EPA’s review, and
and EPA is taking rulemaking action the rationale for EPA’s conclusion
herein on only the portion of the approving the November 17, 2015
Approval and Promulgation of Air
November 12, 2015 submittal submittal as addressing requirements of
Quality Implementation Plans; West
addressing requirements in CAA section prongs 1 and 2 are explained in the
Virginia; Interstate Transport
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2). See NPRM and the technical support
Requirements for the 2012 Fine
83 FR 38112. In addition, EPA stated in document (TSD) that accompanied the
Particulate Matter Standard
the NPRM that the Agency had NPRM and will not be restated here.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection proposed separate action on the portion The TSD is available online at
Agency (EPA). of the November 12, 2015 submittal www.regulations.gov, Docket number
addressing requirements in CAA section EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0373.
ACTION: Final rule.
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4). See 83 FR
27734 (June 14, 2018) (proposing III. Response to Comments
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State approval of the November 12, 2015 EPA received a total of three
implementation plan (SIP) revision submittal for prong 4). EPA is not at this comments on the August 3, 2018 NPRM.
submitted by the State of West Virginia. time taking final action on the 2015 SIP Two comments generally discussed
This revision pertains to the submittal addressing prong 4. For more matters irrelevant to this rulemaking. As
infrastructure requirement for interstate information on particulate pollution, these two comments did not concern
transport of pollution with respect to EPA’s infrastructure requirements, and any of the specific issues raised in the
the 2012 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) interstate transport requirements, see NPRM or address EPA’s rationale for the
national ambient air quality standards Section I of the August 3, 2018 NPRM. proposed approval of West Virginia’s
(NAAQS). EPA is approving this submittal, EPA provides no response to
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
revision in accordance with the these comments. EPA did receive one
Analysis
requirements of the Clean Air Act relevant comment; that comment, and
(CAA). West Virginia’s November 17, 2015 EPA’s response is discussed in this
SIP submittal stated that the current Section of this rulemaking action.
DATES: This final rule is effective on West Virginia SIP contains adequate Comment: The commenter first stated
November 5, 2018. measures to ensure that the State will that EPA did not need to analyze
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a not cause significant contribution to interstate transport of PM2.5 emissions
docket for this action under Docket ID nonattainment in, or interfere with the from West Virginia to California, Idaho,
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0373. All maintenance of, any other State with or Florida, and further questioned the
documents in the docket are listed on respect to the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. West likelihood of West Virginia’s PM2.5
the https://www.regulations.gov Virginia refers to the measures detailed emissions impacting those three States.
website. Although listed in the index, in the section pertaining to The commenter then stated that EPA’s
some information is not publicly requirements in CAA section time and limited resources would be
available, e.g., confidential business 110(a)(2)(A), which included numerous better spent on other more meaningful
information (CBI) or other information SIP-approved measures and other issues, especially since it took three
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. federally enforceable measures, under years to develop the analysis EPA
Certain other material, such as the CAA, that apply to sources of PM2.5 presented.
copyrighted material, is not placed on and its precursors within West Virginia. Response: First, with respect to the
the internet and will be publicly In evaluating whether the measures period of time for EPA’s analysis, CAA
available only in hard copy form. identified by West Virginia addressed section 110(a)(1) requires all States to
Publicly available docket materials are CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), EPA used submit a SIP addressing the elements of
available through https:// the information in the memorandum CAA section 110(a)(2), including CAA
www.regulations.gov, or please contact dated March 17, 2016, entitled, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) on interstate
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER ‘‘Information on the Interstate Transport transport, within three years of EPA
INFORMATION CONTACT section for ‘‘Good Neighbor’’ Provision for the 2012 promulgating a new or revised NAAQS.
Fine Particulate Matter National Further, CAA section 110(k)(2) and (3)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

additional availability information.
Ambient Air Quality Standards under requires EPA action on the SIP
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I),’’ submission within twelve months of
Joseph Schulingkamp, (215) 814–2021,
Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, EPA finding the SIP submission
or by email at schulingkamp.joseph@
Director, EPA Office of Air Quality complete. Therefore, the submission of
epa.gov.
Planning and Standards, https:// a SIP addressing interstate transport
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/ requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1

Document Created: 2018-10-05 01:53:01
Document Modified: 2018-10-05 01:53:01

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from 9 a.m. on October 5, 2018 until 10:45 p.m. on October 5, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 9:15 p.m. October 3, 2018, until 9 a.m. on October 5, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Ryan Junod, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Cleveland; telephone 216-937-0124, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 50262
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 50262 - Safety Zone; APA Convention Fireworks; Lake Erie, Cleveland, OH

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 194 (October 5, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard