83 FR 50312 - Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan, Oklahoma; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 194 (October 5, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 194 (October 5, 2018)
| Page Range | 50312-50314 | |
| FR Document | 2018-21718 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 50312-50314] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-21718] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2017-0145; 9983-65-Region 6] Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan, Oklahoma; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking, withdrawal of proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is supplementing our proposed approval published on March 22, 2018, of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Oklahoma, as submitted by the State of Oklahoma designee with a letter dated February 14, 2017. First, we are reopening the comment period based on information submitted by Oklahoma in a letter dated July 31, 2018, and our analysis of it. Second, EPA is withdrawing its proposed action on the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units rule because the State did not submit it for approval as a SIP revision. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 5, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR- 2017-0145, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Mr. Alan Shar, (214) 665-6691, [email protected]. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on [[Page 50313]] making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Shar, (214) 665-6691; [email protected]. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Alan Shar. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' refer to EPA. I. Background On March 22, 2018 (83 FR 12514), we published a proposed rulemaking action to approve certain revisions to the Oklahoma SIP, as submitted by Oklahoma on February 14, 2017. The submittal covers updates to the Oklahoma SIP, as contained in annual SIP updates for 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, and incorporates the latest changes to the EPA regulations. Specifically, the March 22, 2018 proposal concerned revisions to the following rules in the Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC)--OAC 252:100- 13 Open Burning, OAC 252:100-17 Incinerators, OAC 252:100-25 Visible Emissions and Particulates, OAC 252:100-31 Control of Emission of Sulfur Compounds, OAC 252:100, Appendix E Primary Ambient Air Quality Standards, and OAC 252:100, Appendix F Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards. Comments on the proposal were required to be received by April 23, 2018. II. Additional information submitted by Oklahoma After the close of the public comment period, the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) submitted additional information, by letter dated July 31, 2018, concerning the SIP rule revisions in our March 22, 2018 proposal. ODEQ provided this information in response to adverse comments (EPA-R06-OAR-2017-0145-022) submitted to the EPA during the initial comment period. The information submitted by ODEQ is intended to clarify the rule revisions and their applicability as well as to further demonstrate how the revisions improve the Oklahoma SIP. In particular, ODEQ provided additional information related to the following four rule revisions included in the March 22, 2018 proposal: (1) A revision to OAC 252:100-9(4) that exempts opening burning allowed under OAC 252:100-13-7(6)(B) and OAC 252:100-13-8 from the time restrictions otherwise applicable to opening burning; (2) a revision to OAC 252:100-17-2 adding NSPS Subpart AAAA and NSPS Subpart CCCC to the list of sources exempt from the requirements for general purpose incinerators; (3) a revision to OAC 252:100-25-5(c) eliminating the words ``and EPA'' from the rule's requirement concerning alternative monitoring; and (4) a revision to OAC 252:100-31 which replaces SO2 ambient standards (exposure limits) in the existing SIP at OAC 252:100-31-12 (renumbered OAC 252:100-31-7) with EPA's 2010 SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards. III. EPA's Evaluation and Analysis of ODEQ's July 31, 2018 Letter We have evaluated the information contained in ODEQ's July 31, 2018 letter and find that it affirms our determination that the submitted revisions included in the March 22, 2018 proposal meet SIP requirements, as provided by CAA section 110 and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 51. We have included our evaluation of ODEQ's July 31, 2018 letter and our additional analysis of the four rule revisions identified in part II above in a supplement to the Technical Support Document (TSD) which may be found in the docket. See Supplement 3 to the TSD in the docket for this action. The result of our evaluation and analysis continues to support the proposed approval of the rule revisions identified in the March 22, 2018 proposal, with the recognition of one inadvertent oversight on our part described below. The March 22, 2018 proposal inadvertently includes a proposal to approve rule revisions to OAC 252:100-17, Part 9 Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units--specifically OAC 252:100-17- 60 through 17-76. We are withdrawing our proposal action on these provisions because we lack the authority to act on them under section 110 as a SIP revision. Moreover, these provisions were not submitted to EPA for SIP approval as part of the February 14, 2017 SIP submittal and include provisions that pertain to CAA sections 111(d) and 129, instead, which will be acted upon separately in the future.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Those provisions are not directly related to CAA section 110 (State implementation Plans for NAAQS) and pertain to CAA sections 111(d) (Standards of performance for existing sources; remaining useful life of source) and 129 (Solid waste combustion) standards. These Subchapter 17 revisions were submitted by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality to EPA, by letter dated September 15, 2017, as an update to Oklahoma's Air Quality State Plan for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators (CISWI) units, under CAA sections 111(d) and 129. Pursuant to those statutory provisions and EPA's implementing regulations related thereto, EPA will be evaluating and acting upon the September 15, 2017 Submittal in a separate action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Supplemental Proposed Action In summary, EPA proposed to approve certain revisions to the Oklahoma SIP, as submitted by Oklahoma on February 14, 2017, in our March 22, 2018 proposal (83 FR 12514). In this supplemental proposed action, we are withdrawing the proposed action on the revisions to OAC 252:100-17, Part 9 (Part 9), because Part 9 was not included in Oklahoma's February 14, 2017 SIP submittal. We lack the authority to act on this Part 9 under CAA section 110 because the State did not submit it as a SIP revision for approval. We are proposing to affirm the approvability of the other rule revisions contained in the March 22, 2018 proposal based upon the supplemental information in ODEQ's July 31, 2018 letter, as well as additional information included in Supplement 3 to the TSD. The scope of this supplemental notice and the reopening of the comment period is strictly limited to only the supplemental information and our evaluation of it. The EPA is not reopening the comment period on any other aspect of the March 22, 2018 proposal, as an adequate opportunity to comment on those issues has already been provided. The EPA will not respond to comments received during the reopened comment period outside the above-defined scope. This action will allow interested persons additional time to review the supplemental information to prepare and submit relevant comments. The EPA will address all comments received on the original proposal and on this supplemental action in our final action. V. Incorporation by Reference In this action, we are proposing to include in a final rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing to incorporate by reference revisions to Oklahoma's regulations, as described in part IV above. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through [[Page 50314]] www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: September 18, 2018. David Gray, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2018-21718 Filed 10-4-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![50312 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 and can be viewed by following that ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a website’s instructions. Additionally, AGENCY
preliminary determination that this you may go to the online docket and
action is one of a category of actions that sign up for email alerts, and you will be 40 CFR Part 52
do not individually or cumulatively notified when comments are posted or [EPA–R06–OAR–2017–0145; 9983–65–
have a significant effect on the human a final rule is published. Region 6]
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting 4 hours List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Approval and Promulgation of State
that would prohibit entry within 190 Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation Implementation Plan, Oklahoma;
yards of a fireworks barge. Normally (water), Reporting and record-keeping Supplemental Notice of Proposed
such actions are categorically excluded requirements, Security measures, Rulemaking
from further review under paragraph Waterways.
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, For the reasons discussed in the Agency (EPA).
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to ACTION: Supplemental notice of
Environmental Consideration amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: proposed rulemaking, withdrawal of
supporting this determination is proposed rule.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
available in the docket where indicated SUMMARY: In this supplemental notice of
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
under ADDRESSES. We seek any proposed rulemaking, the
comments or information that may lead Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
to the discovery of a significant is supplementing our proposed approval
continues to read as follows:
environmental impact from this published on March 22, 2018, of
proposed rule. Authority: 3 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; revisions to the State Implementation
G. Protest Activities Department of Homeland Security Delegation Plan (SIP) for Oklahoma, as submitted
No. 0170.1 by the State of Oklahoma designee with
The Coast Guard respects the First
a letter dated February 14, 2017. First,
Amendment rights of protesters. ■ 2. Add § 165.T14–0864 to read as we are reopening the comment period
Protesters are asked to contact the follows: based on information submitted by
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
§ 165. T14–0864 Safety Zone; Tumon Bay, Oklahoma in a letter dated July 31,
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Tumon, GU. 2018, and our analysis of it. Second,
coordinate protest activities so that your
EPA is withdrawing its proposed action
message can be received without (a) Location. The following areas, on the Commercial and Industrial Solid
jeopardizing the safety or security of within the Guam Captain of the Port Waste Incineration Units rule because
people, places, or vessels. (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70–15), all the State did not submit it for approval
V. Public Participation and Request for navigable waters on the surface and as a SIP revision.
Comments below the surface within 190 yards of
DATES: Written comments must be
the fireworks barge participating in the
We view public participation as New Year’s Eve Fireworks display. received on or before November 5, 2018.
essential to effective rulemaking, and ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
(1) Location. The following position
will consider all comments and material identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
13 degrees 30 minutes 24.99 seconds N
received during the comment period. OAR–2017–0145, at http://
Latitude, 144 degrees 47 minutes 21.93
Your comment can help shape the www.regulations.gov or via email to
seconds E Longitude are to be used as
outcome of this rulemaking. If you shar.alan@epa.gov. Follow the online
a guide to the location of the barge.
submit a comment, please include the instructions for submitting comments.
docket number for this rulemaking, (b) Effective Dates. This rule is Once submitted, comments cannot be
indicate the specific section of this effective from 9 p.m. on December 31, edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
document to which each comment 2018 through 1 a.m. on January 1, 2019. The EPA may publish any comment
applies, and provide a reason for each (c) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard received to its public docket. Do not
suggestion or recommendation. commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, submit electronically any information
We encourage you to submit and any other COTP representative you consider to be Confidential
comments through the Federal permitted by law, may enforce this Business Information (CBI) or other
eRulemaking Portal at http:// temporary safety zone. information whose disclosure is
www.regulations.gov. If your material (d) Waiver. The COTP may waive any restricted by statute. Multimedia
cannot be submitted using http:// of the requirements of this rule for any submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
www.regulations.gov, contact the person person, vessel, or class of vessel upon accompanied by a written comment.
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION finding that application of the safety The written comment is considered the
CONTACT section of this document for zone is unnecessary or impractical for official comment and should include
alternate instructions. We accept the purpose of maritime security. discussion of all points you wish to
anonymous comments. All comments (g) Penalties. Vessels or persons make.
received will be posted without change violating this rule are subject to the The EPA will generally not consider
to https://www.regulations.gov and will penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and comments or comment contents located
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
include any personal information you 50 U.S.C. 192. outside of the primary submission (i.e.
have provided. For more about privacy on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
and the docket, visit https:// Dated: October 1, 2018. system). For additional submission
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. Christopher M. Chase, methods, please contact Mr. Alan Shar,
Documents mentioned in this NPRM Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the (214) 665–6691, shar.alan@epa.gov. For
as being available in the docket, and all Port, Guam. the full EPA public comment policy,
public comments, will be in our online [FR Doc. 2018–21621 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am] information about CBI or multimedia
docket at https://www.regulations.gov BILLING CODE 9110–04–P submissions, and general guidance on
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM 05OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50506/page/1.svg)
![50314 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy or in any other area where EPA or an (RACT) and reasonably available control
at the EPA Region 6 office. Indian tribe has demonstrated that a measure (RACM) requirements, a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of reasonable further progress (RFP) plan,
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Indian country, the proposed rule does a modeling demonstration of SO2
Reviews
not have tribal implications and will not attainment, contingency measures for
Under the Act, the Administrator is impose substantial direct costs on tribal the Beaver Area, and Pennsylvania’s
required to approve a SIP submission governments or preempt tribal law as new source review (NSR) permitting
that complies with the provisions of the specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 program. As part of approving the
Act and applicable Federal regulations. FR 67249, November 9, 2000). attainment plan, EPA is also proposing
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). to approve into the Pennsylvania SIP
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
new SO2 emission limits and associated
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, Environmental protection, Air compliance parameters for the
provided that they meet the criteria of pollution control, Hydrocarbons, FirstEnergy Generation, LLC
the Act. Accordingly, this action merely Incorporation by reference, (FirstEnergy) Bruce Mansfield Power
proposes to approve state law as Intergovernmental relations, Reporting Station (Bruce Mansfield Facility) and a
meeting Federal requirements and does and recordkeeping requirements, consent order with Jewel Acquisition
not impose additional requirements Volatile organic compounds. Midland steel plant (Jewel Facility).
beyond those imposed by state law. For Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. This action is being taken under the
that reason, this action: Clean Air Act (CAA).
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Dated: September 18, 2018.
DATES: Written comments must be
action’’ subject to review by the Office David Gray,
received on or before November 5, 2018.
of Management and Budget under Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, [FR Doc. 2018–21718 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am]
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
January 21, 2011); OAR–2017–0681 at http://
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 www.regulations.gov, or via email to
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
action because SIP approvals are AGENCY comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
exempted under Executive Order 12866; follow the online instructions for
• Does not impose an information 40 CFR Part 52 submitting comments. Once submitted,
collection burden under the provisions comments cannot be edited or removed
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0681; FRL–9984–98– from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Region 3]
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); of submission, EPA may publish any
• Is certified as not having a Approval and Promulgation of Air comment received to its public docket.
significant economic impact on a Quality Implementation Plans; Do not submit electronically any
substantial number of small entities Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the information you consider to be
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Beaver, Pennsylvania Nonattainment confidential business information (CBI)
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Area for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide or other information whose disclosure is
• Does not contain any unfunded Primary National Ambient Air Quality restricted by statute. Multimedia
mandate or significantly or uniquely Standard submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
affect small governments, as described accompanied by a written comment.
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection The written comment is considered the
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA). official comment and should include
• Does not have Federalism ACTION: Proposed rule. discussion of all points you wish to
implications as specified in Executive make. EPA will generally not consider
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection comments or comment contents located
1999); Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a outside of the primary submission (i.e.
• Is not an economically significant state implementation plan (SIP) on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
regulatory action based on health or revision, submitted by the system). For additional submission
safety risks subject to Executive Order Commonwealth of Pennsylvania methods, please contact the person
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); through the Pennsylvania Department of identified in the FOR FURTHER
• Is not a significant regulatory action Environmental Protection (PADEP), to INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR EPA on September 29, 2017, for the full EPA public comment policy,
28355, May 22, 2001); purpose of providing for attainment of information about CBI or multimedia
• Is not subject to requirements of the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) primary submissions, and general guidance on
section 12(d) of the National national ambient air quality standard making effective comments, please visit
Technology Transfer and Advancement (NAAQS) in the Beaver County, http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Pennsylvania SO2 nonattainment area commenting-epa-dockts.
application of those requirements would (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Beaver FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
be inconsistent with the Act; and Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). The Beaver Area is Megan Goold (215) 814–2027, or by
• Does not provide EPA with the comprised of a portion of Beaver County email at goold.megan@epa.gov.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
discretionary authority to address, as (Industry Borough, Shippingport
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
appropriate, disproportionate human Borough, Midland Borough, Brighton
health or environmental effects, using Township, Potter Township and Table of Contents
practicable and legally permissible Vanport Township) in Pennsylvania. I. Background for EPA’s Proposed Action
methods, under Executive Order 12898 The SIP submission is an attainment II. Requirements for SO2 Nonattainment Area
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). plan which includes the base year Plan
In addition, the SIP is not approved emissions inventory, an analysis of the III. Attainment Demonstration and Longer
to apply on any Indian reservation land reasonably available control technology Averaging Times
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM 05OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50506/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-05 01:52:19
Document Modified: 2018-10-05 01:52:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking, withdrawal of proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before November 5, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mr. Alan Shar, (214) 665-6691; [email protected] To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Alan Shar. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 50312 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Hydrocarbons; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR