83 FR 50637 - Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 195 (October 9, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 195 (October 9, 2018)
| Page Range | 50637-50639 | |
| FR Document | 2018-21849 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 50637-50639] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-21849] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-583-844] Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that sales of subject merchandise to the United States have been made at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017. Further, Commerce preliminarily finds that Banduoo Ltd. (Banduoo), Fujian Rongshu Industry Co., Ltd. (Fujian Rongshu), Roung Shu Industry Corporation (Roung Shu), and Xiamen Yi-He Textile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Yi-He) [[Page 50638]] made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite all interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable October 9, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3693. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order covers narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge.\1\ The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) statistical categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050; and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the merchandise covered by this order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the (2014-2015) Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Because mandatory respondent Ming Wei Co., Ltd. (Ming Wei) withdrew from participation in the administrative review and failed to respond to Commerce's questionnaire, we preliminarily determine to apply adverse facts available (AFA) to this respondent, in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.308. For a full discussion of the rationale underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On November 20, 2017, and November 30, 2017, Fujian Rongshu, Roung Shu, and Xiamen Yi-He, and Banduoo, respectively, timely filed statements reporting that they made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Subsequently, we received information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) confirming the no shipment claims from Banduoo, Fujian Rongshu, and Xiamen Yi-He. With respect to Roung Shu, we determined that it was necessary to request additional information from CBP and Roung Shu related to various POR entries of merchandise produced by Roung Shu. After reviewing the additional information provided by Roung Shu,\2\ we preliminarily determine that Roung Shu had no shipments during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Roung Shu's Letter re: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: Roung Shu's Response to the Department's May 2, 2018 Questions, dated May 16, 2018, and Roung Shu's Letter re: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: Roung Shu's Response to the Department's May 22, 2018 Supplemental Questionnaire, dated May 25, 2018. In these submissions, Roung Shu provided documentation to demonstrate that it only exported non- subject ribbon to the United States during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the foregoing, Commerce preliminarily determines that Banduoo, Fujian Rongshu, Roung Shu, and Xiamen Yi-He had no shipments during the POR. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent with our practice, we are not preliminarily rescinding the review with respect to Banduoo, Fujian Rongshu, Roung Shu, and Xiamen Yi-He but, rather, we will complete the review with respect to these companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at 51306 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Review Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted- average dumping margin exists: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dumping margin Producer/exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ming Wei Co., Ltd...................................... 137.20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d) \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\8\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \9\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the publication date of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. [[Page 50639]] Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\10\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Where assessments are based upon total facts available, including AFA, we instruct CBP to assess duties at the AFA margin rate. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \11\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, if we continue to find in the final results that Banduoo, Fujian Rongshu, Roung Shu, and Xiamen Yi-He had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under their antidumping duty case numbers (i.e., at that exporter's rate) at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Ming Wei will be that established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.37 percent, the all-others rate determined in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982, 56985 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 2, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments V. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences A. Use of Facts Otherwise Available B. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference C. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse Facts Available Rate VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-21849 Filed 10-5-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Notices 50637
cancelled the planned verification of Final Rescission of New Shipper the regulations and the terms of an APO
Doo Won’s responses due to the Review is a sanctionable violation.
unverifiable state of the record.3 The As explained in the Issues and This notice is issued and published
period of review (POR) is November 1, Decision Memorandum, we continue to this notice in accordance with sections
2016, through April 30, 2017. A find that Doo Won is not the producer 751(i) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
summary of the events that occurred of the garlic subject to this review. CFR 351.221(b)(5).
since Commerce published the Accordingly, its new shipper review Dated: October 1, 2018.
Preliminary Results, as well as a full request was invalid under 19 CFR Gary Taverman,
discussion of the issues raised by parties 351.214(b)(2)(ii). As a result, we are Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
for this final determination, are found in rescinding the new shipper review of and Countervailing Duty Operations,
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, Doo Won. performing the non-exclusive functions and
dated concurrently with, and hereby duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Analysis of Comments Received Enforcement and Compliance.
adopted by, this notice.4 The Issues and
All issues raised in the case and
Decision Memorandum is a public Appendix
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
document and is on file electronically
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
via Enforcement and Compliance’s Decision Memorandum
list of the issues that are raised in the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty briefs and addressed in the Issues and I. Summary
Centralized Electronic Service System Decision Memorandum is in the II. Background
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to Appendix to this notice. III. Scope of the Order
registered users at http:// IV. Bona Fides Analysis
access.trade.gov, and it is available to Cash Deposit Requirements V. Finding that Doo Won is not the Producer
all parties in the Central Records Unit, Effective upon publication of the final of the Subject Merchandise
Room B8024 of the main Commerce rescission of the NSR of Doo Won, VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Doo Won was the
building. In addition, a complete Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs Producer of the Subject Merchandise
version of the Issues and Decision and Border Protection (CBP) to collect Comment 2: Whether Commerce’s Reliance
Memorandum can be accessed directly cash deposits for exports of subject on ‘‘Inconsistencies’’ in Doo Won’s
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. merchandise by Doo Won entered, or Responses to Substantiate its
The signed and electronic versions of withdrawn from warehouse, for Cancellation of Verification is
the Issues and Decision Memorandum consumption on or after the publication Reasonable
date, at the China-wide rate.6 Comment 3: Whether Commerce is
are identical in content. Obligated to Verify or Utilize Doo Won’s
Scope of the Order Assessment Instructions Reported Information
As the result of this rescission of the Comment 4: Whether Commerce
The merchandise covered by this NSR of Doo Won, the entries of Doo Wrongfully Rejected Doo Won’s New
order is all grades of garlic, whether Factual Information
Won covered by this NSR will be
VII. Recommendation
whole or separated into constituent assessed at the cash deposit rate
cloves. The subject merchandise is required at the time of entry, which is [FR Doc. 2018–21733 Filed 10–5–18; 8:45 am]
currently classifiable under the the China-wide rate. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Notification to Importers
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings:
This notice serves as final reminder to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005,
0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate International Trade Administration
0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090,
0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, regarding the reimbursement of [A–583–844]
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500,
of the relevant entries during this POR. Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, and Selvedge From Taiwan: Preliminary
Failure to comply with this requirement
2005.99.9700. A full description of the Results of Antidumping Duty
could result in the Secretary of
scope of the order is contained in the Commerce’s presumption that Administrative Review and Preliminary
Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 reimbursement of antidumping duties Determination of No Shipments; 2016–
Although the HTSUS subheadings are occurred and the subsequent assessment 2017
provided for convenience and customs of double antidumping duties.
purposes, the written product AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
description is dispositive. Return or Destruction of Proprietary International Trade Administration,
Information Department of Commerce.
Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision This notice serves as a reminder to SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Memorandum. parties subject to administrative (Commerce) preliminarily determines
3 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Semiannual New
protective order (APO) of their that sales of subject merchandise to the
Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on responsibility concerning the United States have been made at prices
Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China—
Cancellation of Qingdao Doo Won Food Co., Ltd.’s disposition of business proprietary below normal value during the period of
Verification,’’ dated August 1, 2018. information disclosed under the APO in review (POR) September 1, 2016,
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). through August 31, 2017. Further,
Memorandum for the Final Rescission of We request timely written notification Commerce preliminarily finds that
Antidumping Duty Semiannual New Shipper of return or destruction of APO Banduoo Ltd. (Banduoo), Fujian
Review on Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic
of China: Qingdao Doo Won Foods Co., Ltd.,’’ dated
materials or conversion to judicial Rongshu Industry Co., Ltd. (Fujian
October 1, 2018 (Issues and Decision protective order. Failure to comply with Rongshu), Roung Shu Industry
Memorandum). Corporation (Roung Shu), and Xiamen
5 See the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 See 19 CFR 351.212(c). Yi-He Textile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Yi-He)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:13 Oct 05, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50832/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Notices 50639
Assessment Rates deposit requirements, when imposed, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Upon issuance of the final results, shall remain in effect until further Benito Ballesteros or Christian Llinas,
Commerce shall determine, and CBP notice. AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
shall assess, antidumping duties on all Enforcement and Compliance,
Notification to Importers
appropriate entries covered by this International Trade Administration,
This notice also serves as a U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
review.10 We will instruct CBP to assess
preliminary reminder to importers of Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
their responsibility under 19 CFR DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425
entries covered by this review. Where
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate and (202) 482–4877, respectively.
assessments are based upon total facts
regarding the reimbursement of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
available, including AFA, we instruct
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
CBP to assess duties at the AFA margin Background
of the relevant entries during this POR.
rate. The final results of this review
Failure to comply with this requirement In accordance with section 735(d) and
shall be the basis for the assessment of
could result in Commerce’s 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
antidumping duties on entries of
presumption that reimbursement of amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
merchandise covered by the final results
antidumping duties occurred and the 351.210(c), on August 16, 2018,
of this review and for future deposits of
subsequent assessment of doubled Commerce published its affirmative
estimated duties, where applicable.11
Further, if we continue to find in the antidumping duties. Final Determination in the less than fair
value (LTFV) investigation of stainless
final results that Banduoo, Fujian Notification to Interested Parties
steel flanges from India.1 On September
Rongshu, Roung Shu, and Xiamen Yi-He We are issuing and publishing these 28, 2018, the ITC notified Commerce of
had no shipments of subject results in accordance with sections its final determination pursuant to
merchandise during the POR, we will 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. section 735(d) of the Act, that an
instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended
Dated: October 2, 2018. industry in the United States is
entries that entered under their
Gary Taverman, materially injured by reason of LTFV
antidumping duty case numbers (i.e., at
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping imports of stainless steel flanges from
that exporter’s rate) at the all-others rate
and Countervailing Duty Operations, India, within the meaning of section
if there is no rate for the intermediate
performing the non-exclusive functions and 735(b)(1)(A) of the Act.2
company(ies) involved in the
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
transaction. We intend to issue Scope of the Order
Enforcement and Compliance.
liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days The products covered by this order
after publication of the final results of Appendix are stainless steel flanges from India.
this review. List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary For a complete description of the scope
Cash Deposit Requirements Decision Memorandum of the order, see the Appendix to this
I. Summary notice.
The following deposit requirements
II. Background
will be effective upon publication of the Antidumping Duty Order
III. Scope of the Order
notice of final results of administrative IV. Preliminary Determination of No In accordance with sections
review for all shipments of the subject Shipments 735(b)(1)(A) and 735(d) of the Act, the
merchandise entered, or withdrawn V. Application of Facts Available and ITC has notified Commerce of its final
from warehouse, for consumption on or Adverse Inferences determination in this investigation, in
after the date of publication as provided A. Use of Facts Otherwise Available which it found that imports of stainless
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) B. Application of Facts Available With an
Adverse Inference
steel flanges from India are materially
The cash deposit rate for Ming Wei will injuring a U.S. industry.3 Therefore, in
C. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse
be that established in the final results of Facts Available Rate accordance with sections 735(c)(2) and
this review; (2) for merchandise VI. Recommendation 736(a) of the Act, we are publishing this
exported by manufacturers or exporters antidumping duty order.
[FR Doc. 2018–21849 Filed 10–5–18; 8:45 am]
not covered in this review but covered As a result of the ITC’s final
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
in a prior segment of the proceeding, the determination, in accordance with
cash deposit rate will continue to be the section 736(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce
company-specific rate published for the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE will direct U.S. Customs and Border
most recently completed segment; (3) if Protection (CBP) to assess, upon further
the exporter is not a firm covered in this International Trade Administration instruction by Commerce, antidumping
review, or the original investigation, but duties equal to the amount by which the
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit [A–533–877] normal value of the merchandise
rate will be the rate established for the Stainless Steel Flanges From India: exceeds the export price (or constructed
most recently completed segment for the Antidumping Duty Order export price) of the merchandise, for all
manufacturer of the merchandise; and relevant entries of stainless steel flanges
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, from India. These antidumping duties
manufacturers or exporters will International Trade Administration,
continue to be 4.37 percent, the all- Department of Commerce. 1 See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final
others rate determined in the less-than- SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical
fair-value investigation.12 These cash determinations by the Department of Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745 (August
Commerce (Commerce) and the 16, 2018) (Final Determination).
10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). International Trade Commission (ITC), 2 See ITC Letter regarding stainless steel flanges
11 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. from India, dated September 28, 2018 (ITC
Commerce is issuing an antidumping
12 See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Notification); see also Stainless Steel Flanges from
duty order on stainless steel flanges China, Inv. No. 731–TA–1384 (Final), USITC Pub.
Selvedge from Taiwan and the People’s Republic of
China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR from India. 4828 (September 2018).
56982, 56985 (September 17, 2010). DATES: Applicable October 9, 2018. 3 See ITC Notification.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:13 Oct 05, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50832/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-06 00:58:13
Document Modified: 2018-10-06 00:58:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable October 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3693. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 50637 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR