83 FR 51442 - Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 197 (October 11, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 197 (October 11, 2018)
| Page Range | 51442-51444 | |
| FR Document | 2018-22128 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 51442-51444] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-22128] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-870] Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016- 2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. (NEXTEEL) and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) sold certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Heaney or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475 or (202) 482-0167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background We published the initiation of this administrative review on November 13, 2017.\1\ We selected NEXTEEL and SeAH as the two mandatory respondents in this review. For a detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these preliminary results and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 52268 (November 13, 2017). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2016-2017 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea,'' dated October 3, 2018 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov/login.aspx and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix 1. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The scope of the order also covers OCTG coupling stock. For the full text of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our [[Page 51443]] conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Among the companies under review, Samsung, Samsung C and T Corporation (Samsung C&T), and SeAH Besteel Corporation (SeAH Besteel) properly filed certifications reporting that they had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\3\ On September 20, 2018, we issued no-shipment inquiries to CBP to confirm the claims of no shipments by Samsung C&T and SeAH Besteel, and on October 1, 2018, we issued a no-shipment inquiry to CBP to confirm Samsung's claim of no shipments. We have not yet received CBP's response to all of our inquiries. Therefore, based on the claims of no shipments by Samsung, Samsung C&T, and SeAH Besteel, and because the record currently contains no information to the contrary, we preliminarily determine that Samsung, Samsung C&T, and SeAH Besteel had no shipments of subject merchandise. However, we intend to consider information received from CBP in response to our no-shipment inquiries for the final results of this review. Moreover, consistent with our practice, we are not preliminarily rescinding the review with respect to Samsung, Samsung C&T, and SeAH Besteel, but, rather, we will complete the review with respect to these companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from Samsung C&T, ``Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea: Notice of No Sales,'' dated December 4, 2017 and Letter from SeAH Besteel, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea for the 2016-17 Review Period--No Shipments Letter,'' dated December 13, 2017. \4\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306, 51307 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we have preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for NEXTEEL and SeAH that are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, Commerce preliminarily has assigned to the companies not individually examined (see Appendix 2 for a full list of these companies) a margin of 35.25 percent, which is the weighted average of NEXTEEL's and SeAH's calculated weighted-average dumping margins.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For more information regarding the calculation of this margin, see Memorandum, ``Preliminary Results of the 2016-2017 Administrative Review of Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea; Calculation of the Margin for Non-Examined Companies,'' dated October 3, 2018. As the weighting factor, we relied on the publicly ranged sales data reported in NEXTEEL's and SeAH's quantity and value charts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review Commerce preliminarily determines that, for the period September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NEXTEEL Co., Ltd........................................ 47.62 SeAH Steel Corporation.................................. 19.40 Non-examined companies.................................. 35.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure, Public Comment, and Opportunity To Request a Hearing We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\6\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS \8\ and must be served on interested parties.\9\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \8\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS. An electronically filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\10\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\11\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any case or rebuttal briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, if the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer- [[Page 51444]] specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made to each importer and the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by NEXTEEL or SeAH for which the producer did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, or for any respondent for which we have a final determination of no shipments, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the final results of review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.24 percent,\15\ the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 (August 30, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 3, 2018. Gary Taverman Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 6. Duty Absorption 7. Duty Reimbursement 8. Affiliation 9. Discussion of the Methodology 10. Currency Conversion 11. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Individually Examined AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. BDP International Daewoo International Corporation Daewoo America Dong-A Steel Co. Ltd. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Dongbu Incheon Steel DSEC Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company Hansol Metal Husteel Co., Ltd. HYSCO Hyundai RB Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. Hyundai Steel Company \16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ On September 21, 2016, Commerce published the final results of a changed circumstances review with respect to OCTG from Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel Corporation is the successor-in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of determining antidumping duty cash deposits and liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai Steel Corporation is also known as Hyundai Steel Company and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILJIN Steel Corporation Jim And Freight Co., Ltd. Kia Steel Co. Ltd. KSP Steel Company Kukje Steel Kurvers POSCO Daewoo Corporation POSCO Daewoo America Steel Canada Sumitomo Corporation TGS Pipe Yonghyun Base Materials ZEECO Asia [FR Doc. 2018-22128 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![51442 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Notices
Disclosure and Public Comment Dated: October 3, 2018. this review, see the Preliminary
Gary Taverman, Decision Memorandum, dated
We will disclose to parties in this Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping concurrently with these preliminary
review the calculations performed in and Countervailing Duty Operations, results and hereby adopted by this
reaching the preliminary results within Performing the non-exclusive functions and notice.2
five days of publication of these duties of the Assistant Secretary for The Preliminary Decision
preliminary results.10 Interested parties Enforcement and Compliance. Memorandum is a public document and
may submit written comments (case Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in is on file electronically via Enforcement
briefs) on the preliminary results no the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and Compliance’s Antidumping and
later than 30 days from the date of Countervailing Duty Centralized
I. Summary Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
publication of this Federal Register
II. Background Access to ACCESS is available to
notice, and rebuttal comments (rebuttal III. Scope of the Order
briefs) within five days after the time registered users at https://
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
limit for filing case briefs.11 Pursuant to V. Analysis of Programs
access.trade.gov/login.aspx and is
19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs VI. Recommendation available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
must be limited to issues raised in the [FR Doc. 2018–22129 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
Commerce building. In addition, a
case briefs. Parties who submit BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
complete version of the Preliminary
arguments are requested to submit with Decision Memorandum can be accessed
the argument: (1) A statement of the directly on the internet at https://
issue; (2) a brief summary of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
argument; and (3) a table of A list of the topics discussed in the
International Trade Administration
authorities.12 All briefs must be filed Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
electronically using ACCESS. [A–580–870] attached to this notice as Appendix 1.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), The signed Preliminary Decision
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods Memorandum and the electronic
interested parties who wish to request a From the Republic of Korea:
hearing must submit a written request to version of the Preliminary Decision
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Memorandum are identical in content.
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
and Compliance, filed electronically via 2017 Scope of the Order
ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within The merchandise covered by the order
30 days after the date of publication of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel
this notice.13 Hearing requests should products of circular cross-section,
contain: (1) The party’s name, address, Department of Commerce.
including oil well casing and tubing, of
and telephone number; (2) the number SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both
of participants; and (3) a list of the (Commerce) preliminarily determines carbon and alloy), whether seamless or
issues to be discussed. Issues addressed that NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. (NEXTEEL) and welded, regardless of end finish (e.g.,
at the hearing will be limited to those SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) sold whether or not plain end, threaded, or
raised in the briefs. If a request for a certain oil country tubular goods threaded and coupled) whether or not
hearing is made, parties will be notified (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea conforming to American Petroleum
of the date and time for the hearing to (Korea) in the United States at prices Institute (API) or non-API
below normal value during the period of specifications, whether finished
be held at the U.S. Department of
review (POR) September 1, 2016, (including limited service OCTG
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
through August 31, 2017. Interested products) or unfinished (including
NW, Washington, DC 20230.14
parties are invited to comment on these green tubes and limited service OCTG
Commerce intends to issue the final preliminary results.
results of this administrative review, products), whether or not thread
DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2018. protectors are attached. The scope of the
including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by the parties in their FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: order also covers OCTG coupling stock.
comments, no later than 120 days after Mike Heaney or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD For the full text of the scope of the
the date of publication of this notice, Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and order, see the Preliminary Decision
Compliance, International Trade Memorandum.
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Administration, U.S. Department of
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), unless this Methodology
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
deadline is extended. Commerce is conducting this
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
These preliminary results and notice (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–0167, administrative review in accordance
are issued and published in accordance respectively. with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). price and constructed export price are
Background calculated in accordance with section
We published the initiation of this 772 of the Act. Normal value is
administrative review on November 13, calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
2017.1 We selected NEXTEEL and SeAH
as the two mandatory respondents in the methodology underlying our
10 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). this review. For a detailed description of 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); 351.309(d)(1); and the events that followed the initiation of the Preliminary Results of the 2016–2017
19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
13 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR the Republic of Korea,’’ dated October 3, 2018
14 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 52268 (November 13, 2017). (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:54 Oct 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_51639/page/1.svg)
![51444 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Notices
specific ad valorem assessment rates for proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Appendix II
the merchandise based on the ratio of continue to be the company-specific rate List of Companies Not Individually
the total amount of dumping calculated published for the most recently Examined
for the examined sales made to each completed segment of this proceeding in
AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
importer and the total entered value of which they were reviewed; (3) if the BDP International
those same sales, in accordance with 19 exporter is not a firm covered in this Daewoo International Corporation
CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has review, a prior review, or the original Daewoo America
not reported reliable entered values, we investigation but the producer is, the Dong-A Steel Co. Ltd.
will calculate a per-unit assessment rate cash deposit rate will be the rate Dong Yang Steel Pipe
for each importer by dividing the total established for the most recently Dongbu Incheon Steel
amount of dumping calculated for the completed segment of this proceeding DSEC
Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company
examined sales made to that importer by for the producer of the merchandise; (4)
Hansol Metal
the total sales quantity associated with the cash deposit rate for all other Husteel Co., Ltd.
those transactions. Where an importer- producers or exporters will continue to HYSCO
specific ad valorem assessment rate is be 5.24 percent,15 the all-others rate Hyundai RB
zero or de minimis in the final results established in the less-than-fair-value Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.
of review, we will instruct CBP to investigation. These cash deposit Hyundai Steel Company 16
liquidate the appropriate entries requirements, when imposed, shall ILJIN Steel Corporation
without regard to antidumping duties in remain in effect until further notice. Jim And Freight Co., Ltd.
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If Kia Steel Co. Ltd.
a respondent’s weighted-average Notification to Importers KSP Steel Company
Kukje Steel
dumping margin is zero or de minimis This notice serves as a preliminary Kurvers
in the final results of review, we will reminder to importers of their POSCO Daewoo Corporation
instruct CBP not to assess duties on any responsibility under 19 CFR POSCO Daewoo America
of its entries in accordance with the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Steel Canada
Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., Sumitomo Corporation
regarding the reimbursement of
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin TGS Pipe
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Yonghyun Base Materials
of dumping for the exporter is of the relevant entries during this POR. ZEECO Asia
determined to be zero or de minimis, no Failure to comply with this requirement
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 13 [FR Doc. 2018–22128 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
could result in Commerce’s
For entries of subject merchandise presumption that reimbursement of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
during the POR produced by NEXTEEL antidumping duties occurred and the
or SeAH for which the producer did not subsequent assessment of double
know its merchandise was destined for DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
antidumping duties.
the United States, or for any respondent
for which we have a final determination Notification to Interested Parties International Trade Administration
of no shipments, we will instruct CBP [C–570–955]
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the Commerce is issuing and publishing
all-others rate if there is no rate for the these results in accordance with Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
intermediate company(ies) involved in sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the the People’s Republic of China:
the transaction.14 Act. Preliminary Results of the
Dated: October 3, 2018. Countervailing Duty Administrative
Cash Deposit Requirements Review; 2016
Gary Taverman
The following cash deposit Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
requirements will be effective upon AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
and Countervailing Duty Operations, International Trade Administration,
publication of the notice of final results performing the non-exclusive functions and
of this administrative review for all Department of Commerce.
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
shipments of the subject merchandise Enforcement and Compliance. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, (Commerce) preliminarily determines to
for consumption on or after the date of Appendix I rescind this administrative review as
publication, as provided by section there is no evidence of any reviewable
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary entries, shipments, or sales of certain
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit Decision Memorandum
rate for the companies listed in the final magnesia carbon bricks (magnesia
1. Summary carbon bricks) from the People’s
results of review will be equal to the 2. Background
weighted-average dumping margin Republic of China (China) to the United
3. Scope of the Order States during the January 1, 2016,
established in the final results of this 4. Preliminary Determination of No
administrative review; (2) for through December 31, 2016, period of
Shipments
merchandise exported by producers or review (POR) by the companies subject
5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
exporters not covered in this review but 6. Duty Absorption 16 On September 21, 2016, Commerce published
covered in a prior segment of the 7. Duty Reimbursement the final results of a changed circumstances review
8. Affiliation with respect to OCTG from Korea, finding that
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
13 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
9. Discussion of the Methodology Hyundai Steel Corporation is the successor-in-
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 10. Currency Conversion interest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping determining antidumping duty cash deposits and
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
11. Recommendation
liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Reviews). 15 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of
14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 Steel Corporation is also known as Hyundai Steel
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). (August 30, 2016). Company and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:54 Oct 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_51639/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-11 15:34:20
Document Modified: 2018-10-11 15:34:20
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable: October 11, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mike Heaney or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475 or (202) 482-0167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 51442 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR