83 FR 5197 - Security Zone; Choptank River, Cambridge, MD
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 25 (February 6, 2018)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 25 (February 6, 2018)
| Page Range | 5197-5199 | |
| FR Document | 2018-02282 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 5197-5199] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-02282] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2018-0020] RIN 1625-AA87 Security Zone; Choptank River, Cambridge, MD AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Temporary final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone encompassing certain waters of the Choptank River. This action is necessary to prevent waterside threats before, during, and after an event held at the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina in Cambridge, MD, during February 7-9, 2018. This rule prohibits vessels and persons from entering the security zone and requires vessels and persons in the security zone to depart the security zone, unless specifically exempt under the provisions in this rule or granted specific permission from the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Maryland- National Capital Region or his designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective from noon on February 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on February 9, 2018. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2018-0020 in the ``SEARCH'' box, and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. [[Page 5198]] Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations COTP Captain of the Port CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security E.O. Executive order FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Pub. L. Public Law Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard was unable to publish an NPRM and hold a comment period for this rulemaking due to the short time period between event planners notifying the Coast Guard of the event and publication of this security zone. It is necessary for the Coast Guard to establish this security zone for this event to ensure the appropriate level of protection for high-ranking United States officials and the public. Delaying the rulemaking to allow for opportunity for comment would be contrary to the security zone's intended objectives of protecting the high-ranking United States officials and the public, as it would introduce vulnerability to the safety and security of high-ranking United States officials and the general public. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest for the same reasons discussed above for forgoing notice and comment. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region has determined that a security zone is needed to protect VIPS (very important persons) and the public, mitigate potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and maritime safety and security in order to safeguard life, property, and the environment on or near the navigable waters near the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina in Cambridge, MD. IV. Discussion of the Rule An event will be held at the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina in Cambridge, MD, during February 7-9, 2018. A gathering of high-ranking U.S. officials is expected to take place at this event at Cambridge, MD. This rule establishes a security zone from noon on February 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on February 9, 2018. The security zone will include all navigable waters of the Choptank River, within 2,000 yards of the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina's Breakwater Pavilion, in position latitude 38[deg]33'54'' N, longitude 076[deg]02'47'' W, located in Cambridge, MD. This location is entirely within the Area of Responsibility of the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region, as set forth at 33 CFR 3.25-15. Entry into this security zone is prohibited, unless specifically authorized by the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region. Except for public vessels and vessels already at berth, mooring, or at anchor, this rule temporarily requires all vessels in the designated security zone as defined by this rule to immediately depart the security zone. Coast Guard personnel will be present to prevent the movement of unauthorized persons into the zone. Federal, state, and local agencies may assist the Coast Guard in the enforcement of this rule. The Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners to further publicize the security zone and notify the public of changes in the status of the zone. Such notices will continue until the event is complete. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the security zone. This security zone will impact the waters affected by this rule during an enforcement period of approximately two days. Due to the time of year, the amount of vessel traffic that will be prohibited from accessing the security zone is expected to be minimal. In addition, notifications will be made to the maritime community via marine information broadcasts so mariners may adjust their plans accordingly. Such notifications will be updated as necessary to keep the maritime community informed of the status of the security zone. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business [[Page 5199]] Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1- 888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321- 4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves establishing a security zone that is 49 hours in duration and is necessary to provide security for high-ranking U.S. officials and the public. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Figure 2-1 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001- 01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0020 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T05-0020 Security Zone; Choptank River, Cambridge, MD. (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable waters of the Choptank River, within 2,000 yards of the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina's Breakwater Pavilion, in position latitude 38[deg]33'54'' N, longitude 076[deg]02'47'' W, located in Cambridge, MD. Coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983. (b) Definitions. As used in this section: Captain of the Port means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region. Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the security zone described in paragraph (b) of this section. Public vessel means a vessel that is owned or demise-(bareboat) chartered by the government of the United States, by a state or local government, or by the government of a foreign country and that is not engaged in commercial service. (c) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33 CFR part 165 subpart D apply to the security zone created by this section. (1) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP). Public vessels and vessels already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the security zone is implemented do not have to depart the security zone. All vessels underway within this security zone at the time it is implemented are to depart the zone. (2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must first obtain authorization from the COTP or designated representative. To request permission to transit the area, the COTP and or designated representatives can be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). If permission is granted, persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or designated representative and proceed as directed while within the zone. (3) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from noon on February 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on February 9, 2018. Dated: January 31, 2018. Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National Capital Region. [FR Doc. 2018-02282 Filed 2-5-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 5197
Number 40% of Hourly Projected
Time per
Rule Component of 2016 FOIA wage of cost savings
request
requests requests requester to public
291 ......... DTRA (DNA) ................................................. 78 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥588.43
292 ......... DIA ................................................................ 902 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥6,804.69
293 ......... NGA (NIMA) .................................................. 109 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥822.30
295 ......... DoD IG .......................................................... 772 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥5,823.97
296 ......... NRO .............................................................. 165 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥1,244.76
298 ......... DSS (DIS) ..................................................... 310 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥2,338.64
299 ......... NSA/CSS ....................................................... 1,881 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥14,190.26
518 ......... Army .............................................................. 25,775 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥194,446.60
701 ......... Navy .............................................................. 9,605 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥72,460.12
806 ......... Air Force ........................................................ 4,918 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥37,101.39
300 ......... DLA ............................................................... 3,920 × 40% × 30 minutes × 37.72 = ¥29,572.48
Total ........................................................................ ................ ................ .................... .................. ¥384,080.13
Regulatory Procedures Department of Defense, which do not DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
create such an impact. SECURITY
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Coast Guard
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
and Regulatory Review’’ 33 CFR Part 165
This final rule does not impose
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
reporting or recordkeeping requirements [Docket Number USCG–2018–0020]
direct agencies to assess all costs and
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of RIN 1625–AA87
benefits of available regulatory
1995.
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ Security Zone; Choptank River,
approaches that maximize net benefits Cambridge, MD
(including potential economic, Executive Order 13132 establishes AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
environmental, public health and safety certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule ACTION: Temporary final rule.
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the that imposes substantial direct SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
importance of quantifying both costs requirement costs on state and local establishing a temporary security zone
and benefits, of reducing costs, of governments, preempts state law, or encompassing certain waters of the
harmonizing rules, and of promoting otherwise has federalism implications. Choptank River. This action is necessary
flexibility. This rule is not a significant This final rule will not have a to prevent waterside threats before,
regulatory action under E.O. 12866. substantial effect on state and local during, and after an event held at the
governments, or otherwise have Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf
Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing
federalism implications. Resort, Spa and Marina in Cambridge,
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ MD, during February 7–9, 2018. This
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 286
rule prohibits vessels and persons from
This final rule is considered an E.O. Freedom of Information Act. entering the security zone and requires
13771 deregulatory action. Details on vessels and persons in the security zone
the estimated cost savings of this rule Accordingly, the interim rule to depart the security zone, unless
are discussed in the ‘‘expected cost published at 82 FR 1192–1206 on specifically exempt under the
savings’’ section of the rule. January 5, 2017, is adopted as final with provisions in this rule or granted
the following changes: specific permission from the Coast
Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act’’ (2 U.S.C. Ch. 25) Guard Captain of the Port Maryland-
PART 286—[AMENDED] National Capital Region or his
This final rule is not subject to the designated representative.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 1. The authority citation for part 286 DATES: This rule is effective from noon
because it does not contain a federal continues to read as follows: on February 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on
mandate that may result in the
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552. February 9, 2018.
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the ADDRESSES: To view documents
§ 286.7 [Amended]
private sector, of $100M or more in any mentioned in this preamble as being
one year. ■ 2. In § 286.7, amend paragraph (c) in available in the docket, go to http://
the first sentence by removing the www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory 0020 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box, and click
phrase ‘‘inform this DoD Component’’
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Ch. 6) ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
and adding in its place ‘‘inform them’’.
It has been certified that this final rule Folder on the line associated with this
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Dated: February 1, 2018. rule.
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because it does not have Aaron Siegel, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
a significant economic impact on a Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison you have questions on this rule, call or
substantial number of small entities. Officer, Department of Defense. email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Sector
The rule implements the procedures for [FR Doc. 2018–02302 Filed 2–5–18; 8:45 am] Maryland-National Capital Region
processing FOIA requests within the BILLING CODE 5001–06–P Waterways Management Division, U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Feb 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_5222/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 5199
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The guides the Coast Guard in complying Designated representative means any
Ombudsman evaluates these actions with the National Environmental Policy Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
annually and rates each agency’s Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and petty officer who has been authorized
responsiveness to small business. If you have determined that this action is one by the Captain of the Port Maryland-
wish to comment on actions by of a category of actions that do not National Capital Region to assist in
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– individually or cumulatively have a enforcing the security zone described in
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The significant effect on the human paragraph (b) of this section.
Coast Guard will not retaliate against environment. This rule involves
small entities that question or complain establishing a security zone that is 49 Public vessel means a vessel that is
about this rule or any policy or action hours in duration and is necessary to owned or demise-(bareboat) chartered
of the Coast Guard. provide security for high-ranking U.S. by the government of the United States,
officials and the public. It is by a state or local government, or by the
C. Collection of Information government of a foreign country and
categorically excluded from further
This rule will not call for a new review under paragraph L60(a) of Figure that is not engaged in commercial
collection of information under the 2–1 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS service.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, (c) Regulations. The general security
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental zone regulations found in 33 CFR part
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Consideration supporting this 165 subpart D apply to the security zone
Governments determination is available in the docket created by this section.
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
A rule has implications for federalism (1) Entry into or remaining in this
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has G. Protest Activities zone is prohibited unless authorized by
a substantial direct effect on the states, The Coast Guard respects the First the Captain of the Port (COTP). Public
on the relationship between the national Amendment rights of protesters. vessels and vessels already at berth,
government and the states, or on the Protesters are asked to contact the mooring, or anchor at the time the
distribution of power and person listed in the FOR FURTHER security zone is implemented do not
responsibilities among the various INFORMATION CONTACT section to have to depart the security zone. All
levels of government. We have analyzed coordinate protest activities so that your vessels underway within this security
this rule under that Order and have message can be received without zone at the time it is implemented are
determined that it is consistent with the jeopardizing the safety or security of to depart the zone.
fundamental federalism principles and people, places or vessels.
preemption requirements described in (2) Persons desiring to transit the area
E.O. 13132. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 of the security zone must first obtain
Also, this rule does not have tribal Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation authorization from the COTP or
implications under E.O. 13175, (water), Reporting and recordkeeping designated representative. To request
Consultation and Coordination with requirements, Security measures, permission to transit the area, the COTP
Indian Tribal Governments, because it Waterways. and or designated representatives can be
does not have a substantial direct effect For the reasons discussed in the contacted at telephone number 410–
on one or more Indian tribes, on the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio
relationship between the Federal CFR part 165 as follows: VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The
Government and Indian tribes, or on the Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
distribution of power and PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION section can be contacted on Marine
responsibilities between the Federal AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
Government and Indian tribes. If you MHz). If permission is granted, persons
believe this rule has implications for ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 and vessels must comply with the
federalism or Indian tribes, please continues to read as follows:
instructions of the COTP or designated
contact the person listed in the FOR Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; representative and proceed as directed
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; while within the zone.
above. Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1. (3) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Coast Guard may be assisted in the
■ 2. Add § 165.T05–0020 to read as
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act follows: patrol and enforcement of the zone by
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal, State, and local agencies.
Federal agencies to assess the effects of § 165.T05–0020 Security Zone; Choptank (d) Enforcement period. This section
their discretionary regulatory actions. In River, Cambridge, MD.
will be enforced from noon on February
particular, the Act addresses actions (a) Location. The following area is a 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on February 9,
that may result in the expenditure by a security zone: All navigable waters of
2018.
State, local, or tribal government, in the the Choptank River, within 2,000 yards
aggregate, or by the private sector of of the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Dated: January 31, 2018.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Golf Resort, Spa and Marina’s Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.
more in any one year. Though this rule Breakwater Pavilion, in position latitude Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
will not result in such an expenditure, 38°33′54″ N, longitude 076°02′47″ W, Port Sector Maryland-National Capital
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
we do discuss the effects of this rule located in Cambridge, MD. Coordinates Region.
elsewhere in this preamble. refer to datum NAD 1983. [FR Doc. 2018–02282 Filed 2–5–18; 8:45 am]
(b) Definitions. As used in this
F. Environment section:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
We have analyzed this rule under Captain of the Port means the
Department of Homeland Security Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Management Directive 023–01 which Maryland-National Capital Region.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Feb 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM 06FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_5222/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-06 00:30:44
Document Modified: 2018-02-06 00:30:44
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective from noon on February 7, 2018, through 1 p.m. on February 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 5197 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA87 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR