83_FR_53176 83 FR 52973 - Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices; Classification of the Intranasal Electrostimulation Device for Dry Eye Symptoms

83 FR 52973 - Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices; Classification of the Intranasal Electrostimulation Device for Dry Eye Symptoms

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 203 (October 19, 2018)

Page Range52973-52975
FR Document2018-22785

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying the intranasal electrostimulation device for dry eye symptoms into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the intranasal electrostimulation device for dry eye symptoms' classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52973-52975]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 886

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-3634]


Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices; Classification of the 
Intranasal Electrostimulation Device for Dry Eye Symptoms

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is

[[Page 52974]]

classifying the intranasal electrostimulation device for dry eye 
symptoms into class II (special controls). The special controls that 
apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part 
of the codified language for the intranasal electrostimulation device 
for dry eye symptoms' classification. We are taking this action because 
we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special 
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance 
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing 
regulatory burdens.

DATES: This order is effective October 19, 2018. The classification was 
applicable on May 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elvin Ng, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2431, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 240-402-4662, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA has classified the intranasal electrostimulation 
device for dry eye symptoms as class II (special controls), which we 
have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance 
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing 
regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than 
the automatic class III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices'' 
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of 
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that 
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device 
is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures 
for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization 
Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De 
Novo classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo 
application process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may 
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device 
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from 
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of 
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 
513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall 
classify the device by written order within 120 days. The 
classification will be according to the criteria under section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed 
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the 
initial classification of the device.
    We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' 
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory 
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De 
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of 
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a 
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request 
or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent 
device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence''). 
Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when 
necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On October 23, 2017, Allergan submitted a request for De Novo 
classification of the TrueTear Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator. FDA 
reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria 
for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special 
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for 
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the 
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can 
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. 
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the 
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on May 17, 2018, FDA issued an order to the requester 
classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the 
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 886.5310. We have named 
the generic type of device intranasal electrostimulation device for dry 
eye symptoms, and it is identified as a prescription non-implantable, 
electrostimulation device intended to increase tear production for 
improvement in dry eye symptoms.
    FDA has identified the following risks to health associated 
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to 
mitigate these risks in table 1.

Table 1--Intranasal Electrostimulation Device for Dry Eye Symptoms Risks
                         and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Identified risks                   Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tissue damage due to overstimulation/    Non-clinical performance
 understimulation or mechanical injury    testing; Software
 (ex: tips too long), device breakage.    verification, validation, and
                                          hazard analysis; Electrical,
                                          thermal, and mechanical safety
                                          testing; and Labeling.

[[Page 52975]]

 
Adverse tissue reaction................  Biocompatibility evaluation and
                                          Labeling.
Infection..............................  Labeling.
Electrical shock or burn...............  Electrical, thermal, and
                                          mechanical safety testing;
                                          Software verification,
                                          validation, and hazard
                                          analysis; and Labeling.
Interference with other devices........  Electromagnetic compatibility
                                          (EMC) testing; Software
                                          verification, validation, and
                                          hazard analysis; and Labeling.
Pain, headache, or discomfort..........  Clinical performance testing;
                                          Non-clinical performance
                                          testing; Electrical, thermal,
                                          and mechanical safety testing;
                                          and Labeling.
Failure to mitigate dry eye symptoms...  Clinical performance testing,
                                          Training, and Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this 
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, 
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified 
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k).
    At the time of classification, intranasal electrostimulation 
devices for dry eye symptoms are for prescription use only. 
Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate 
directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the 
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the 
conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21 U.S.C. 
352(f)(1)).

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections 
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification 
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of 
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding 
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820, regarding 
quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB control number 
0910-0073; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, 
regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved under 
OMB control number 0910-0120; and the collections of information in 21 
CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 886

    Medical devices, Ophthalmic goods and services.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
886 is amended as follows:

PART 886--OPHTHALMIC DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 886 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  886.5310 to subpart F to read as follows:


Sec.  886.5310  Intranasal electrostimulation device for dry eye 
symptoms.

    (a) Identification. An intranasal electrostimulation device for dry 
eye symptoms is a prescription non-implantable, electrostimulation 
device intended to increase tear production for improvement in dry eye 
symptoms.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) Clinical performance testing must evaluate improvement of dry 
eye symptoms under anticipated conditions of use.
    (2) Non-clinical performance testing must assess the following 
electrical output specifications: waveforms, output modes, maximum 
output voltage, maximum output current, pulse duration, frequency, net 
charge per pulse, maximum phase charge at 500 ohms, maximum current 
density, maximum average current, and maximum average power density.
    (3) Patient-contacting components of the device must be 
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
    (4) Performance testing must demonstrate the electrical, thermal, 
and mechanical safety along with electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of 
the device in the intended use environment.
    (5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be 
performed.
    (6) Training for the proper use of the device must be provided.
    (7) Physician and patient labeling must include:
    (i) Summaries of electrical stimulation parameters;
    (ii) Instructions on how to correctly use and maintain the device;
    (iii) Instructions and explanations of all user-interface 
components;
    (iv) Information related to electromagnetic compatibility 
classification;
    (v) Instructions on how to clean the device; and
    (vi) Summaries of clinical performance testing demonstrating safety 
and effectiveness.

    Dated: October 15, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-22785 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                      52973

                                           is codifying the classification of the                                 prescription device used to stimulate                     FDA has identified the following risks
                                           device by adding 21 CFR 882.5893. We                                   the vestibular system by applying                      to health associated specifically with
                                           have named the generic type of device                                  thermal waveforms through earpieces                    this type of device and the measures
                                           thermal vestibular stimulator for                                      placed in a patient’s ear canal for the                required to mitigate these risks in table
                                           headache, and it is identified as a                                    treatment of headache.                                 1.

                                                                TABLE 1—THERMAL VESTIBULAR STIMULATOR FOR HEADACHE RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
                                                               Identified risks                                                                             Mitigation measures

                                           Adverse tissue reaction .............................              Biocompatibility evaluation, Cleaning validation, and Labeling.
                                           Thermal injury ............................................        Labeling, Non-clinical performance testing, Thermal safety testing, Technical specifications, and
                                                                                                                Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
                                           Ear tenderness and/or pruritus ..................                  Labeling, Non-clinical performance testing, and Thermal safety testing.
                                           Nausea and/or dizziness ...........................                Labeling, Non-clinical performance testing, and Software verification, validation, and hazard anal-
                                                                                                                ysis.
                                           Tinnitus ......................................................    Labeling, Non-clinical performance testing, and Software verification, validation, and hazard anal-
                                                                                                                ysis.



                                             FDA has determined that special                                      number 0910–0844; the collections of                     (1) The patient-contacting
                                           controls, in combination with the                                      information in 21 CFR part 814,                        components of the device must be
                                           general controls, address these risks to                               subparts A through E, regarding                        demonstrated to be biocompatible.
                                           health and provide reasonable assurance                                premarket approval, have been                            (2) Performance testing must validate
                                           of safety and effectiveness. For a device                              approved under OMB control number                      electromagnetic compatibility and
                                           to fall within this classification, and                                0910–0231; the collections of                          electrical, mechanical, and thermal
                                           thus avoid automatic classification in                                 information in 21 CFR part 820,                        safety.
                                           class III, it would have to comply with                                regarding quality system regulations,                    (3) The technical parameters of the
                                           the special controls named in this final                               have been approved under OMB control                   device, including waveform outputs and
                                           order. The necessary special controls                                  number 0910–0073; the collections of                   temperature limits, must be identified.
                                           appear in the regulation codified by this                              information in part 807, subpart E,                      (4) Cleaning validation of earpieces
                                           order. This device is subject to                                       regarding premarket notification                       must be conducted.
                                           premarket notification requirements                                    submissions, have been approved under                    (5) Software verification, validation,
                                           under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.                                  OMB control number 0910–0120; and                      and hazard analysis must be performed.
                                             At the time of classification, thermal                               the collections of information in 21 CFR                 (6) Labeling must include the
                                           vestibular stimulators for headache are                                part 801, regarding labeling, have been                following:
                                           for prescription use only. Prescription                                approved under OMB control number                        (i) Information on how the device
                                           devices are exempt from the                                            0910–0485.                                             operates and the typical sensations
                                           requirement for adequate directions for                                                                                       experienced during treatment;
                                           use for the layperson under section                                    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
                                                                                                                                                                           (ii) A detailed summary of the
                                           502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.                                         Medical devices.                                 device’s technical parameters; and
                                           352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as                                                                                         (iii) Instructions for maintenance and
                                           the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are                                     Therefore, under the Federal Food,                   cleaning of the device.
                                           met (referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).                                Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
                                                                                                                  authority delegated to the Commissioner                  Dated: October 16, 2018.
                                           III. Analysis of Environmental Impact                                  of Food and Drugs, part 882 is amended                 Leslie Kux,
                                              We have determined under 21 CFR                                     as follows:                                            Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                           25.34(b) that this action is of a type that                                                                                   [FR Doc. 2018–22842 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                           does not individually or cumulatively                                  PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES                          BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
                                           have a significant effect on the human
                                           environment. Therefore, neither an                                     ■ 1. The authority citation for part 882
                                           environmental assessment nor an                                        continues to read as follows:                          DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                           environmental impact statement is                                        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,           HUMAN SERVICES
                                           required.                                                              360j, 360l, 371.
                                                                                                                                                                         Food and Drug Administration
                                           IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                                    ■ 2. Add § 882.5893 to subpart F to read
                                             This final order establishes special                                 as follows:                                            21 CFR Part 886
                                           controls that refer to previously
                                                                                                                  § 882.5893 Thermal vestibular stimulator               [Docket No. FDA–2018–N–3634]
                                           approved collections of information                                    for headache.
                                           found in other FDA regulations and
                                                                                                                     (a) Identification. The thermal                     Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices;
                                           guidance. These collections of
                                                                                                                  vestibular stimulator for headache is a                Classification of the Intranasal
                                           information are subject to review by the
                                                                                                                  prescription device used to stimulate                  Electrostimulation Device for Dry Eye
                                           Office of Management and Budget
                                                                                                                  the vestibular system by applying                      Symptoms
                                           (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The                                 thermal waveforms through earpieces                    AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,
                                           collections of information in the                                      placed in a patient’s ear canal for the                HHS.
                                           guidance document ‘‘De Novo                                            treatment of headache.
                                                                                                                                                                         ACTION:   Final order.
                                           Classification Process (Evaluation of                                     (b) Classification. Class II (special
                                           Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have                                controls). The special controls for this               SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
                                           been approved under OMB control                                        device are:                                            Administration (FDA or we) is


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014        16:11 Oct 18, 2018        Jkt 247001        PO 00000    Frm 00031   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM   19OCR1


                                           52974             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                           classifying the intranasal                                 FDA may take a variety of actions in               the De Novo process, the device can
                                           electrostimulation device for dry eye                   appropriate circumstances to classify or              serve as a predicate for future devices of
                                           symptoms into class II (special                         reclassify a device into class I or II. We            that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
                                           controls). The special controls that                    may issue an order finding a new device               U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
                                           apply to the device type are identified                 to be substantially equivalent under                  device sponsors do not have to submit
                                           in this order and will be part of the                   section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21                    a De Novo request or premarket
                                           codified language for the intranasal                    U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that            approval application to market a
                                           electrostimulation device for dry eye                   does not require premarket approval.                  substantially equivalent device (see 21
                                           symptoms’ classification. We are taking                 We determine whether a new device is                  U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
                                           this action because we have determined                  substantially equivalent to a predicate               equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
                                           that classifying the device into class II               by means of the procedures for                        the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
                                           (special controls) will provide a                       premarket notification under section                  when necessary, to market their device.
                                           reasonable assurance of safety and                      510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
                                                                                                   360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).               II. De Novo Classification
                                           effectiveness of the device. We believe
                                           this action will also enhance patients’                    FDA may also classify a device                        On October 23, 2017, Allergan
                                           access to beneficial innovative devices,                through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a                 submitted a request for De Novo
                                           in part by reducing regulatory burdens.                 common name for the process                           classification of the TrueTear Intranasal
                                           DATES: This order is effective October                  authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the             Tear Neurostimulator. FDA reviewed
                                           19, 2018. The classification was                        FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
                                                                                                                                                         the request in order to classify the
                                           applicable on May 17, 2018.                             Drug Administration Modernization Act
                                                                                                                                                         device under the criteria for
                                                                                                   of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established
                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                              classification set forth in section
                                                                                                   the first procedure for De Novo
                                           Elvin Ng, Center for Devices and                                                                              513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
                                                                                                   classification. Section 607 of the Food
                                           Radiological Health, Food and Drug                                                                               We classify devices into class II if
                                                                                                   and Drug Administration Safety and
                                           Administration, 10903 New Hampshire                     Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)                      general controls by themselves are
                                           Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2431, Silver Spring,                modified the De Novo application                      insufficient to provide reasonable
                                           MD, 20993–0002, 240–402–4662,                           process by adding a second procedure.                 assurance of safety and effectiveness,
                                           Elvin.Ng@fda.hhs.gov.                                   A device sponsor may utilize either                   but there is sufficient information to
                                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              procedure for De Novo classification.                 establish special controls that, in
                                           I. Background                                              Under the first procedure, the person              combination with the general controls,
                                                                                                   submits a 510(k) for a device that has                provide reasonable assurance of the
                                              Upon request, FDA has classified the                 not previously been classified. After                 safety and effectiveness of the device for
                                           intranasal electrostimulation device for                receiving an order from FDA classifying               its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
                                           dry eye symptoms as class II (special                   the device into class III under section               360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
                                           controls), which we have determined                     513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person                 information submitted in the request,
                                           will provide a reasonable assurance of                  then requests a classification under                  we determined that the device can be
                                           safety and effectiveness. In addition, we               section 513(f)(2).                                    classified into class II with the
                                           believe this action will enhance                           Under the second procedure, rather                 establishment of special controls. FDA
                                           patients’ access to beneficial innovation,              than first submitting a 510(k) and then               has determined that these special
                                           in part by reducing regulatory burdens                  a request for classification, if the person           controls, in addition to the general
                                           by placing the device into a lower                      determines that there is no legally                   controls, will provide reasonable
                                           device class than the automatic class III               marketed device upon which to base a                  assurance of the safety and effectiveness
                                           assignment.                                             determination of substantial                          of the device.
                                              The automatic assignment of class III                equivalence, that person requests a
                                           occurs by operation of law and without                                                                           Therefore, on May 17, 2018, FDA
                                                                                                   classification under section 513(f)(2) of
                                           any action by FDA, regardless of the                                                                          issued an order to the requester
                                                                                                   the FD&C Act.
                                           level of risk posed by the new device.                     Under either procedure for De Novo                 classifying the device into class II. FDA
                                           Any device that was not in commercial                   classification, FDA shall classify the                is codifying the classification of the
                                           distribution before May 28, 1976, is                    device by written order within 120 days.              device by adding 21 CFR 886.5310. We
                                           automatically classified as, and remains                The classification will be according to               have named the generic type of device
                                           within, class III and requires premarket                the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of               intranasal electrostimulation device for
                                           approval unless and until FDA takes an                  the FD&C Act. Although the device was                 dry eye symptoms, and it is identified
                                           action to classify or reclassify the device             automatically placed within class III,                as a prescription non-implantable,
                                           (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to                 the De Novo classification is considered              electrostimulation device intended to
                                           these devices as ‘‘postamendments                       to be the initial classification of the               increase tear production for
                                           devices’’ because they were not in                      device.                                               improvement in dry eye symptoms.
                                           commercial distribution prior to the                       We believe this De Novo classification                FDA has identified the following risks
                                           date of enactment of the Medical Device                 will enhance patients’ access to                      to health associated specifically with
                                           Amendments of 1976, which amended                       beneficial innovation, in part by                     this type of device and the measures
                                           the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic                    reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA                 required to mitigate these risks in
                                           Act (FD&C Act).                                         classifies a device into class I or II via            table 1.

                                                TABLE 1—INTRANASAL ELECTROSTIMULATION DEVICE FOR DRY EYE SYMPTOMS RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                                                           Identified risks                                                               Mitigation measures

                                           Tissue damage due to overstimulation/understimulation or mechanical                  Non-clinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and
                                             injury (ex: tips too long), device breakage.                                         hazard analysis; Electrical, thermal, and mechanical safety testing;
                                                                                                                                  and Labeling.



                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:11 Oct 18, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM   19OCR1


                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                                  52975

                                               TABLE 1—INTRANASAL ELECTROSTIMULATION DEVICE FOR DRY EYE SYMPTOMS RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES—
                                                                                           Continued
                                                                                      Identified risks                                                                                Mitigation measures

                                           Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................             Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.
                                           Infection ....................................................................................................   Labeling.
                                           Electrical shock or burn ............................................................................            Electrical, thermal, and mechanical safety testing; Software verification,
                                                                                                                                                              validation, and hazard analysis; and Labeling.
                                           Interference with other devices ................................................................                 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing; Software verification, vali-
                                                                                                                                                              dation, and hazard analysis; and Labeling.
                                           Pain, headache, or discomfort .................................................................                  Clinical performance testing; Non-clinical performance testing; Elec-
                                                                                                                                                              trical, thermal, and mechanical safety testing; and Labeling.
                                           Failure to mitigate dry eye symptoms ......................................................                      Clinical performance testing, Training, and Labeling.



                                             FDA has determined that special                                          subparts A through E, regarding                                output modes, maximum output
                                           controls, in combination with the                                          premarket approval, have been                                  voltage, maximum output current, pulse
                                           general controls, address these risks to                                   approved under OMB control number                              duration, frequency, net charge per
                                           health and provide reasonable assurance                                    0910–0231; the collections of                                  pulse, maximum phase charge at 500
                                           of safety and effectiveness. For a device                                  information in 21 CFR part 820,                                ohms, maximum current density,
                                           to fall within this classification, and                                    regarding quality system regulation,                           maximum average current, and
                                           thus avoid automatic classification in                                     have been approved under OMB control                           maximum average power density.
                                           class III, it would have to comply with                                    number 0910–0073; the collections of
                                           the special controls named in this final                                   information in part 807, subpart E,                               (3) Patient-contacting components of
                                           order. The necessary special controls                                      regarding premarket notification                               the device must be demonstrated to be
                                           appear in the regulation codified by this                                  submissions, have been approved under                          biocompatible.
                                           order. This device is subject to                                           OMB control number 0910–0120; and                                 (4) Performance testing must
                                           premarket notification requirements                                        the collections of information in 21 CFR                       demonstrate the electrical, thermal, and
                                           under section 510(k).                                                      part 801, regarding labeling, have been                        mechanical safety along with
                                             At the time of classification,                                           approved under OMB control number                              electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of
                                           intranasal electrostimulation devices for                                  0910–0485.                                                     the device in the intended use
                                           dry eye symptoms are for prescription                                                                                                     environment.
                                                                                                                      List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 886
                                           use only. Prescription devices are
                                                                                                                        Medical devices, Ophthalmic goods                               (5) Software verification, validation,
                                           exempt from the requirement for
                                                                                                                      and services.                                                  and hazard analysis must be performed.
                                           adequate directions for use for the
                                           layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the                                     Therefore, under the Federal Food,                              (6) Training for the proper use of the
                                           FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21                                      Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under                               device must be provided.
                                           CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of                                    authority delegated to the Commissioner                           (7) Physician and patient labeling
                                           21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21                                    of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 886 is                          must include:
                                           U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).                                                         amended as follows:                                               (i) Summaries of electrical stimulation
                                           III. Analysis of Environmental Impact                                      PART 886—OPHTHALMIC DEVICES                                    parameters;
                                             We have determined under 21 CFR                                                                                                            (ii) Instructions on how to correctly
                                           25.34(b) that this action is of a type that                                ■ 1. The authority citation for part 886                       use and maintain the device;
                                           does not individually or cumulatively                                      continues to read as follows:
                                                                                                                                                                                        (iii) Instructions and explanations of
                                           have a significant effect on the human                                       Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,                   all user-interface components;
                                           environment. Therefore, neither an                                         360j, 360l, 371.
                                           environmental assessment nor an                                                                                                              (iv) Information related to
                                                                                                                      ■ 2. Add § 886.5310 to subpart F to read                       electromagnetic compatibility
                                           environmental impact statement is                                          as follows:
                                           required.                                                                                                                                 classification;
                                                                                                                      § 886.5310 Intranasal electrostimulation                          (v) Instructions on how to clean the
                                           IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                                        device for dry eye symptoms.                                   device; and
                                             This final order establishes special                                       (a) Identification. An intranasal
                                                                                                                                                                                        (vi) Summaries of clinical
                                           controls that refer to previously                                          electrostimulation device for dry eye
                                           approved collections of information                                                                                                       performance testing demonstrating
                                                                                                                      symptoms is a prescription non-
                                           found in other FDA regulations and                                                                                                        safety and effectiveness.
                                                                                                                      implantable, electrostimulation device
                                           guidance. These collections of                                             intended to increase tear production for                         Dated: October 15, 2018.
                                           information are subject to review by the                                   improvement in dry eye symptoms.                               Leslie Kux,
                                           Office of Management and Budget                                              (b) Classification. Class II (special                        Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                           (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction                                        controls). The special controls for this                       [FR Doc. 2018–22785 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                           Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The                                     device are:
                                                                                                                                                                                     BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
                                           collections of information in the                                            (1) Clinical performance testing must
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           guidance document ‘‘De Novo                                                evaluate improvement of dry eye
                                           Classification Process (Evaluation of                                      symptoms under anticipated conditions
                                           Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have                                    of use.
                                           been approved under OMB control                                              (2) Non-clinical performance testing
                                           number 0910–0844; the collections of                                       must assess the following electrical
                                           information in 21 CFR part 814,                                            output specifications: waveforms,


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014         16:11 Oct 18, 2018         Jkt 247001      PO 00000        Frm 00033       Fmt 4700       Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM   19OCR1



Document Created: 2018-10-19 01:25:05
Document Modified: 2018-10-19 01:25:05
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal order.
DatesThis order is effective October 19, 2018. The classification was applicable on May 17, 2018.
ContactElvin Ng, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2431, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 240-402-4662, [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 52973 
CFR AssociatedMedical Devices and Ophthalmic Goods and Services

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR