83 FR 52981 - Safety Zone; Fox River, Brown County Fireworks, Green Bay, WI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 203 (October 19, 2018)

Page Range		52981-52983
FR Document		2018-22845

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Fox River in Green Bay, WI, for all navigable waters within a 210-foot radius of the approximate launch position at 44[deg]31.016' N, 088[deg]01.016' W (NAD 83). This action is necessary to protect spectators, mariners, vessels, and property from potential hazards associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52981-52983]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0910]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Fox River, Brown County Fireworks, Green Bay, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Fox River in Green Bay, WI, for all navigable waters within a 210-foot 
radius of the approximate launch position at 44[deg]31.016' N, 
088[deg]01.016' W (NAD 83). This action is necessary to protect 
spectators, mariners, vessels, and property from potential hazards 
associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into 
this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain 
of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 
26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0910 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
document, call or email the marine event coordinator, MSTC Kaleena 
Carpino, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 
Milwaukee, WI; telephone (414) 747-7148, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were 
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time 
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would be both 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would 
inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public, vessels, 
mariners, and property from the hazards associated with the fireworks 
display on October 26, 2018.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register for the same reasons discussed in 
the preceding paragraph. Waiting for a 30 day notice period to run 
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 
and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone on October 26, 2018, 
from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m., for a fireworks display on Fox River in 
Green Bay, WI. The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has determined 
that this fireworks display will pose a significant risk to public 
safety and property. Such hazards include premature and accidental 
detonations, falling and burning debris, and collisions among spectator 
vessels.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect persons and vessels during the fireworks display 
in the waters of Fox River, in Green Bay, WI. This zone is effective 
and will be enforced from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 26, 2018. 
The safety zone will encompass all navigable waters of Fox River within 
a 210-foot radius of the approximate launch position at 44[deg]31.016' 
N, 088[deg]01.016' W (NAD 83).

[[Page 52982]]

    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 
or a designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or a 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. The safety 
zone created by this rule will be relatively small and enforced for 
only 30 minutes. Under certain conditions, vessels may still transit 
through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port. 
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via 
VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit or anchor in the affected portion of Fox River, in Green Bay, 
WI between 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 26, 2018. This safety 
zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities for the reasons cited in the Regulatory 
Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the enforcement of 
the zone, we will issue local Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Public 
Notice of Safety Zone so vessel owners and operators can plan 
accordingly.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
the establishment of a safety zone surrounding a fireworks display on 
Fox River, in Green Bay, WI. It is categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph L[60(a)] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


[[Page 52983]]


    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
 2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0910 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0910   Safety Zone; Fox River, Brown County Fireworks, 
Green Bay, WI.

    (a) Location. All navigable waters of Fox River within a 210-foot 
radius of the approximate launch position at 44[deg]31.0167' N, 
088[deg]01.016' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective and 
will be enforced from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 26, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated 
on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake 
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on 
his or her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF 
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in 
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the 
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: October 2, 2018.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 2018-22845 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

52982 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring the affected portion of Fox River, in because it does not have a substantial
within the safety zone is prohibited Green Bay, WI between 7 p.m. through direct effect on one or more Indian
unless authorized by the Captain of the 7:30 p.m. on October 26, 2018. This tribes, on the relationship between the
Port Lake Michigan or a designated on- safety zone will not have a significant Federal Government and Indian tribes,
scene representative. The Captain of the economic impact on a substantial or on the distribution of power and
Port or a designated on-scene number of small entities for the reasons responsibilities between the Federal
representative may be contacted via cited in the Regulatory Planning and Government and Indian tribes. If you
VHF Channel 16. Review section. Additionally, before the believe this rule has implications for
enforcement of the zone, we will issue federalism or Indian tribes, please
V. Regulatory Analyses
local Broadcast Notice to Mariners and contact the person listed in the FOR
We developed this rule after Public Notice of Safety Zone so vessel FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
considering numerous statutes and owners and operators can plan above.
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. accordingly.
Below we summarize our analyses Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
based on a number of these statutes and Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Executive Orders, and we discuss First Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Amendment rights of protestors. we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
direct agencies to assess the costs and jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
benefits of available regulatory concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
alternatives and, if regulation is compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
necessary, to select regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
approaches that maximize net benefits. CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
to control regulatory costs through a on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
budgeting process. This rule has not who enforce, or otherwise determine
been designated a ‘‘significant compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
regulatory action,’’ under Executive the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
not been reviewed by the Office of and the Regional Small Business Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Management and Budget (OMB), and Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt Ombudsman evaluates these actions Coast Guard in complying with the
from the requirements of Executive annually and rates each agency’s National Environmental Policy Act of
Order 13771. responsiveness to small business. If you 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
This regulatory action determination wish to comment on actions by determined that this action is one of a
is based on the size, location, duration, employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– category of actions that do not
and time-of-year of the safety zone. The 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The individually or cumulatively have a
safety zone created by this rule will be Coast Guard will not retaliate against significant effect on the human
relatively small and enforced for only 30 small entities that question or complain environment. This rule involves the
minutes. Under certain conditions, about this rule or any policy or action establishment of a safety zone
vessels may still transit through the of the Coast Guard. surrounding a fireworks display on Fox
safety zone when permitted by the River, in Green Bay, WI. It is
Captain of the Port. Moreover, the Coast C. Collection of Information categorically excluded from further
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to This rule will not call for a new review under paragraph L[60(a)] of
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel collection of information under the Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
16 about the zone. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Record of Environmental Consideration
B. Impact on Small Entities
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal supporting this determination is
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of available in the docket where indicated
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Governments
under ADDRESSES.
requires Federal agencies to consider A rule has implications for federalism
the potential impact of regulations on under Executive Order 13132, G. Protest Activities
small entities during rulemaking. The Federalism, if it has a substantial direct The Coast Guard respects the First
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small effect on the States, on the relationship Amendment rights of protesters.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations between the national government and Protesters are asked to contact the
that are independently owned and the States, or on the distribution of person listed in the FOR FURTHER
operated and are not dominant in their power and responsibilities among the INFORMATION CONTACT section to
fields, and governmental jurisdictions various levels of government. We have coordinate protest activities so that your
with populations of less than 50,000. analyzed this rule under that Order and message can be received without
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. have determined that it is consistent jeopardizing the safety or security of
605(b) that this rule will not have a with the fundamental federalism
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES

people, places or vessels.
significant economic impact on a principles and preemption requirements
substantial number of small entities. described in Executive Order 13132. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
This rule will affect the following Also, this rule does not have tribal Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
entities, some of which might be small implications under Executive Order (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
entities: The owners or operators of 13175, Consultation and Coordination requirements, Security measures,
vessels intending to transit or anchor in with Indian Tribal Governments, Waterways.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Oct 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM 19OCR1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 52983

For the reasons discussed in the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION form. Publicly available docket
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 AGENCY materials are available through http://
CFR part 165 as follows: www.regulations.gov, or please contact
40 CFR Part 52 the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION [EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0309 and EPA–R10– INFORMATION CONTACT section for
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS OAR–2018–0316: FRL–9985–28–Region 8 additional availability information.
and Region 10] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, EPA,
continues to read as follows: Determination of Attainment by the Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR, 1595
Attainment Date and Clean Data Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Determination for the Logan, UT-ID
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
80202–1129, (303) 312–6602,
2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Nonattainment ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov, or Matthew
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Area
No. 0170.1. Jentgen, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air
AGENCY: Environmental Protection and Waste (OAW–150), EPA, Region 10,
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0910 to read as Agency (EPA). 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle,
follows: Washington 98101; (206) 553–0340;
ACTION: Final rule.
jentgen.matthew@epa.gov.
§ 165.T09–0910 Safety Zone; Fox River, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Brown County Fireworks, Green Bay, WI. Agency (EPA) is finalizing a Throughout this document, wherever
(a) Location. All navigable waters of determination of attainment by the ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
Fox River within a 210-foot radius of the attainment date and a clean data intended to refer to the EPA.
approximate launch position at determination (CDD) for the 2006 24-
I. Background
44°31.0167′ N, 088°01.016′ W (NAD 83). hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
Logan, Utah (UT)-Idaho (ID) On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144),
(b) Effective and enforcement period. nonattainment area. These the EPA revised the level of the 24-hour
This rule is effective and will be determinations are based upon quality- PM2.5 NAAQS, lowering the primary
enforced from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. assured, quality-controlled and certified and secondary standards from the 1997
on October 26, 2018. ambient air monitoring data for the standard of 65 micrograms per cubic
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with period 2015–2017, available in the meter (mg/m3) to 35 mg/m3. On
the general regulations in § 165.23 of EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), the
this part, entry into, transiting, or database, showing that the area has EPA designated several areas as
anchoring within this safety zone is attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5
prohibited unless authorized by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS of 35 mg/m3, including the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a (NAAQS). Based on the final Logan, Utah UT-ID nonattainment area.
designated on-scene representative. determination that the Logan, UT-ID On July 17, 2018 (83 FR 33886), the
nonattainment area is currently EPA proposed to determine, based on
(2) This safety zone is closed to all the most recent 3 years (2015–2017) of
attaining the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, the
vessel traffic, except as may be valid data,1 that the Logan, UT-ID
EPA is also issuing the final
permitted by the Captain of the Port nonattainment area has attained the
determination that the obligation for
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene 2006 primary and secondary 24-hour
Utah and Idaho to make submissions to
representative. PM2.5 NAAQS by the December 31, 2017
meet certain Clean Air Act (CAA or the
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of Act) requirements related to attainment attainment date. In addition, based on
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan of the NAAQS for this area is not the CDD, the EPA also proposed to
is any Coast Guard commissioned, applicable for as long as the area determine that the obligation to submit
warrant or petty officer who has been continues to attain the NAAQS. any remaining attainment-related SIP
designated by the Captain of the Port Additionally, the sanctions and Federal revisions arising from classification of
Lake Michigan to act on his or her Implementation Plan (FIP) clocks the Logan, UT-ID area as a Moderate
behalf. triggered by the partial disapproval of nonattainment area under subpart 4 of
the contingency measure element for the part D (of title I of the Act) for the 2006
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
Idaho portion of the Logan, UT-ID PM2.5 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is not applicable
or operate within the safety zone must
State Implementation Plan (SIP) will be so long as the area continues to attain
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
suspended. the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
Michigan or an on-scene representative
DATES: This final rule is effective on
Additional detail can be found in the
to obtain permission to do so. The
October 19, 2018. July 17, 2018 (83 FR 33886) proposed
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
action.
on-scene representative may be ADDRESSES: The EPA has established
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel dockets for this action under Docket ID II. Response to Comments
operators given permission to enter or No. EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0309 and/or The EPA received eight public
operate in the safety zone must comply Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018– comments on the proposed action.
with all directions given to them by the 0316. All documents in the docket are Three of the comments related to
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an listed on the https:// forestry practices and wildfire
on-scene representative. www.regulations.gov website. Although management, primarily in California.
listed in the index, some information is
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES

Dated: October 2, 2018. One comment related to child labor
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other practices in South America. One
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer, information whose disclosure is comment related to homelessness in
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the restricted by statute. Certain other California. Another comment discussed
Port. material, such as copyrighted material,
[FR Doc. 2018–22845 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am] is not placed on the internet and will be 1 Meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 50,

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P publicly available only in hard copy appendix N, and part 58.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Oct 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM 19OCR1

Document Created: 2018-10-19 01:26:12
Document Modified: 2018-10-19 01:26:12

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 7 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 26, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this document, call or email the marine event coordinator, MSTC Kaleena Carpino, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI; telephone (414) 747-7148, email D09-SMB-SECLakeMichigan- [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 52981
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 52981 - Safety Zone; Fox River, Brown County Fireworks, Green Bay, WI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 203 (October 19, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard