83_FR_53280 83 FR 53077 - Final Environmental Impact Statement on American Electric Power's American Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas

83 FR 53077 - Final Environmental Impact Statement on American Electric Power's American Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 203 (October 19, 2018)

Page Range53077-53078
FR Document2018-22833

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, under the National Environmental Policy Act, make available the final environmental impact statement analyzing the impacts of issuance of an incidental take permit (ITP) for implementation of American Electric Power's American Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas (HCP). Our decision is to issue a 30-year ITP for implementation of the HCP, which authorizes incidental take of the American burying beetle under the Endangered Species Act.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53077-53078]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2017-0105; FXES11140200000-190-FF02ENEH00]


Final Environmental Impact Statement on American Electric Power's 
American Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Arkansas, 
Oklahoma, and Texas

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, under the National 
Environmental Policy Act, make available the final environmental impact 
statement analyzing the impacts of issuance of an incidental take 
permit (ITP) for implementation of American Electric Power's American 
Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and 
Texas (HCP). Our decision is to issue a 30-year ITP for implementation 
of the HCP, which authorizes incidental take of the American burying 
beetle under the Endangered Species Act.

DATES: We will finalize a record of decision and issue a permit no 
sooner than November 19, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of the documents in the following 
formats:
     Electronic:
    [cir] http://www.regulations.gov, in Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2017-
0105.
    [cir] https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Oklahoma/.
    [cir] CD-ROM: Contact Ms. Jonna Polk (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT).
    [cir] Telephone: 918-581-7458.
     Hard copy: You may review the final environmental impact 
statement (EIS) at the following locations (by appointment only):
    [cir] Department of the Interior, Natural Resources Library, 1849 C 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. Call 202-208-5815.
    [cir] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500 Gold Avenue SW, Room 
6034, Albuquerque, NM 87102. Call 505-248-6920.
    [cir] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 9014 E 21st St., Tulsa, OK 
74129. Call 918-581-7458.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Polk, Field Supervisor, via U.S. 
mail at Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 9014 E. 21st St., Tulsa, OK 74129; or via phone at 
918-581-7458.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
(Service), announce the availability of several documents related to an 
incidental take permit (ITP) application under the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The final EIS 
was developed in compliance with the agency decision-making 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.), and is based on the habitat conservation plan (HCP) as 
submitted by American Electric Power (applicant). We described, fully 
evaluated, and analyzed all three alternatives in detail in our 2018 
final EIS.
    Our proposed action is to issue an ITP to the applicant under 
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA that authorizes incidental take of the 
American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus; ABB) from the 
applicant's maintenance, operation, and expansion of its electrical 
facilities in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas. American Electric Power is 
one of the largest electric utilities in the country, with an electric 
system that includes transmission lines, substations, switching 
stations, and a distribution network. American Electric Power's ability 
to serve its customers depends on the timely installation, operation, 
and maintenance of its electric facilities. The plan area for the HCP 
includes areas where authorized incidental take would occur and 
conservation measures would take place, a total of almost 32 million 
acres. The applicant requested a term of 30 years from the date of ITP 
issuance. The

[[Page 53078]]

applicant will fully implement minimization and mitigation measures to 
offset impacts to the ABB according to the HCP.
    The applicant has agreed to include the following minimization 
measures:
     Reducing erosion by implementing stormwater best 
practices;
     Limiting use of motor vehicles, machinery, or heavy 
equipment in occupied ABB habitat to avoid soil compaction;
     Increasing safety during operation fluid use and storage;
     Limiting disturbance from mechanical vegetation 
management;
     Limiting the use of artificial lighting in occupied ABB 
habitat; and
     Providing a training program for all personnel conducting 
or supervising covered activities that may disturb ABB-occupied 
habitat.
    The mitigation measures include the following commitments:
     Relieve soil compaction by disking (mechanically breaking 
up) compacted soil in laydown areas and material storage areas;
     Revegetate with a native species composition similar to 
that of the surrounding area (typically warm season grasses) or of the 
same vegetation type that existed prior to impacts for areas that 
experienced ground disturbance causing temporary or permanent cover 
change habitat impacts; and
     Establish off-site habitat mitigation for temporary or 
permanent cover change and permanent impacts.
    In addition to this notice, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) is publishing a notice announcing the EIS, as required under the 
Clean Air Act, section 309 (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.; see EPA's Role in 
the EIS Process below).

Background

    The applicant has applied for an ITP under the ESA that would 
authorize incidental take of the ABB and would be in effect for a 
period of 30 years. The proposed incidental take of the ABB would occur 
from lawful, non-Federal activities from the applicant's repair, 
maintenance, and construction activities for electrical lines and 
support facilities (e.g., substations and switching facilities) within 
the plan area, as well as from activities carried out as part of the 
HCP's conservation strategy (covered activities). The HCP plan area 
includes Oklahoma and Arkansas counties within known ABB ranges and 
Texas counties with ABB occurrence records. The plan area also includes 
counties in these States where the ABB's range could expand over the 
ITP term. The final EIS considers the direct, indirect, and cumulative 
effects of implementing the HCP, including measures to minimize and 
mitigate such impacts to the maximum extent practicable.
    Section 9 of the ESA and its implementing regulations in title 50 
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) prohibit ``take'' of fish and 
wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA. The 
ESA defines ``take'' as ``to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, 
kill, trap, capture, or collect listed animal species, or attempt to 
engage in such conduct'' (16 U.S.C. 1533). The term ``harm'' is defined 
in the regulations as significant habitat modification or degradation 
that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly 
impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, 
or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). However, we may, under specified 
circumstances, issue permits that allow the take of federally listed 
species, provided that the take is incidental to, but not the purpose 
of, otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing ITPs for 
endangered and threatened species are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, 
respectively.
    On July 3, 2018, we published a Federal Register notice announcing 
the availability for public review of a draft EIS and requested public 
comment on our evaluation of the potential impacts associated with 
issuance of an ITP for implementation of the HCP and to evaluate 
alternatives (82 FR 32861). In July and August 2018, we held public 
meetings on the draft document in Tulsa, OK; McAlester, OK; Fort Smith, 
AR; and Texarkana, TX. The public comment period closed on August 17, 
2018.
    We received 10 comments in total: 8 Through regulations.gov, 1 
comment via email, and 1 through the U.S. mail. The final EIS provides 
responses to those comments in Appendix G.

Decision

    We intend to issue an ITP allowing the applicant to implement the 
proposed HCP, identified as the preferred alternative (Alternative B) 
in the final EIS. We determined that the preferred alternative best 
balances the protection and management of habitat for the ABB, while 
allowing the applicant to supply the public's energy needs. We based 
our decision on a thorough review of the alternatives and their 
environmental consequences. Implementing this decision entails issuing 
an ITP to American Electric Power and full implementation of the HCP, 
including minimization and mitigation measures, monitoring and adaptive 
management, and complying with all terms and conditions in the ITP.

EPA's Role in the EIS Process

    In addition to this notice, EPA is publishing a notice in the 
Federal Register announcing final EIS for American Electric Power's 
American Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in Oklahoma, 
Arkansas, and Texas, as required under the Clean Air Act, section 309. 
The EPA is charged with reviewing all Federal agencies' EISs and 
commenting on the adequacy and acceptability of the environmental 
impacts of proposed actions in EISs.
    The EPA also serves as the repository (EIS database) for EISs that 
Federal agencies prepare. All EISs must be filed with EPA, which 
publishes a notice of availability on Fridays in the Federal Register. 
For more information, see https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may search for 
EPA comments on EISs, along with EISs themselves, at https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

Authority

    We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32) 
and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 
CFR 1506.6).

Amy L. Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 2018-22833 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P



                                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices                                          53077

                                              habitat, remove the levees within and                   Selected Alternative                                     Æ https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/
                                              between Ponds R5 and S5, and improve                       The ROD identifies the preferred                   Oklahoma/.
                                              recreation and public access.                           alternative as the selected alternative.                 Æ CD–ROM: Contact Ms. Jonna Polk
                                              Alternative Ravenswood D would also                     This alternative is also the                          (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
                                              allow temporary stormwater detention                                                                             Æ Telephone: 918–581–7458.
                                                                                                      environmentally preferred alternative.
                                              into Ponds R5 and S5 via connections                                                                             • Hard copy: You may review the
                                                                                                      The basis for the decision, descriptions
                                              with the City of Redwood City’s                                                                               final environmental impact statement
                                                                                                      of the alternatives considered, an
                                              Bayfront Canal and Atherton Channel                                                                           (EIS) at the following locations (by
                                                                                                      overview of the measures to be
                                              Project. This would treat a residual                                                                          appointment only):
                                                                                                      implemented to avoid and minimized
                                              salinity problem in Ponds R5 and S5.                                                                             Æ Department of the Interior, Natural
                                                                                                      environmental effects, and a summary
                                                 Following public review of the Draft                                                                       Resources Library, 1849 C Street NW,
                                                                                                      of the public involvement process are
                                              EIS/EIR, USFWS and the California                                                                             Washington, DC 20240. Call 202–208–
                                                                                                      provided in the ROD.
                                              State Coastal Conservancy, in                                                                                 5815.
                                              coordination with the Project                           Authority                                                Æ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500
                                              Management Team and other project                         We publish this notice under the                    Gold Avenue SW, Room 6034,
                                              partners, identified the preferred                      authority of the National Environmental               Albuquerque, NM 87102. Call 505–248–
                                              alternative, which is based on                          Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and               6920.
                                              restoration enhancements at all four                    the Department of Interior’s                             Æ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
                                              pond clusters, as well as maintained or                 implementing regulations in title 43 of               9014 E 21st St., Tulsa, OK 74129. Call
                                              increased flood protection and                          the Code of Federal Regulations (43 CFR               918–581–7458.
                                              additional public access and recreation                 part 46).                                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                              features at two of the Phase 2 pond                                                                           Jonna Polk, Field Supervisor, via U.S.
                                              clusters. The preferred alternative is                  Jody Holzworth,                                       mail at Oklahoma Ecological Services
                                              described in Chapter 6 of the Final EIS/                Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest           Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
                                              EIR. A summary is provided below.                       Region.                                               Service, 9014 E. 21st St., Tulsa, OK
                                                 Preferred Alternative: The preferred                 [FR Doc. 2018–22763 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]          74129; or via phone at 918–581–7458.
                                              alternative at each pond cluster is as                  BILLING CODE 4333–15–P                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
                                              follows:                                                                                                      U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
                                                 • At the Island Ponds it is Alternative                                                                    announce the availability of several
                                              Island B, with one restoration                          DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR                            documents related to an incidental take
                                              component of Alternative Island C                                                                             permit (ITP) application under the
                                                                                                      Fish and Wildlife Service
                                              included, which is to widen only the                                                                          Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
                                              westernmost of the two existing                                                                               amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
                                                                                                      [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2017–0105;
                                              breaches on the south side of Pond A19.                 FXES11140200000–190–FF02ENEH00]                       The final EIS was developed in
                                                 • At the Mountain View Ponds it is                                                                         compliance with the agency decision-
                                              essentially Alternative Mountain View                   Final Environmental Impact Statement                  making requirements of the National
                                              B, with the substitution of one habitat                 on American Electric Power’s                          Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
                                              enhancement (do not include                             American Burying Beetle Habitat                       U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and is based on the
                                              Charleston Slough in tidal marsh                        Conservation Plan in Arkansas,                        habitat conservation plan (HCP) as
                                              restoration but do construct a habitat                  Oklahoma, and Texas                                   submitted by American Electric Power
                                              transition zone across the entire                                                                             (applicant). We described, fully
                                              southern extent of Pond A1, but only                    AGENCY:   Fish and Wildlife Service,                  evaluated, and analyzed all three
                                              across central portion of A2W) and the                  Interior.                                             alternatives in detail in our 2018 final
                                              addition of one public access                           ACTION: Notice of availability.                       EIS.
                                              component drawn from Mountain View                                                                               Our proposed action is to issue an ITP
                                              C (add recreational trail on eastern levee              SUMMARY:   We, the U.S. Fish and                      to the applicant under section
                                              of Pond A2W to the northeast corner of                  Wildlife Service, under the National                  10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA that authorizes
                                              Pond A2W). There is also a modification                 Environmental Policy Act, make                        incidental take of the American burying
                                              of one of the flood protection features                 available the final environmental impact              beetle (Nicrophorus americanus; ABB)
                                              presented in the two action alternatives                statement analyzing the impacts of                    from the applicant’s maintenance,
                                              (raise the Coast Casey Forebay levee                    issuance of an incidental take permit                 operation, and expansion of its
                                              along southern border of Charleston                     (ITP) for implementation of American                  electrical facilities in Oklahoma,
                                              Slough and maintain necessary access to                 Electric Power’s American Burying                     Arkansas, and Texas. American Electric
                                              existing utilities adjacent to that levee).             Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan in                   Power is one of the largest electric
                                                 • At the A8 Ponds it is Alternative A8               Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas (HCP).                  utilities in the country, with an electric
                                              B, except that the top elevation of the                 Our decision is to issue a 30-year ITP for            system that includes transmission lines,
                                              proposed transition zones has been                      implementation of the HCP, which                      substations, switching stations, and a
                                              increased to provide greater erosion                    authorizes incidental take of the                     distribution network. American Electric
                                              protection.                                             American burying beetle under the                     Power’s ability to serve its customers
                                                 • At the Ravenswood Ponds it is                      Endangered Species Act.                               depends on the timely installation,
                                              similar to Alternative Ravenswood B, in                 DATES: We will finalize a record of                   operation, and maintenance of its
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                              its restoration goals and features for                  decision and issue a permit no sooner                 electric facilities. The plan area for the
                                              Ponds R3, R4, R5, and S5, but it also                   than November 19, 2018.                               HCP includes areas where authorized
                                              includes an additional habitat transition               ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of                   incidental take would occur and
                                              zone and a trail on the eastern edge of                 the documents in the following formats:               conservation measures would take
                                              Ponds R5 and S5, all of which were                         • Electronic:                                      place, a total of almost 32 million acres.
                                              included in Alternatives Ravenswood C                      Æ http://www.regulations.gov, in                   The applicant requested a term of 30
                                              and D.                                                  Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2017–0105.                       years from the date of ITP issuance. The


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:25 Oct 18, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00051   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM   19OCN1


                                              53078                         Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices

                                              applicant will fully implement                          term. The final EIS considers the direct,             mitigation measures, monitoring and
                                              minimization and mitigation measures                    indirect, and cumulative effects of                   adaptive management, and complying
                                              to offset impacts to the ABB according                  implementing the HCP, including                       with all terms and conditions in the ITP.
                                              to the HCP.                                             measures to minimize and mitigate such
                                                                                                                                                            EPA’s Role in the EIS Process
                                                 The applicant has agreed to include                  impacts to the maximum extent
                                              the following minimization measures:                    practicable.                                            In addition to this notice, EPA is
                                                 • Reducing erosion by implementing                      Section 9 of the ESA and its                       publishing a notice in the Federal
                                              stormwater best practices;                              implementing regulations in title 50 of               Register announcing final EIS for
                                                 • Limiting use of motor vehicles,                    the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)                 American Electric Power’s American
                                              machinery, or heavy equipment in                        prohibit ‘‘take’’ of fish and wildlife                Burying Beetle Habitat Conservation
                                              occupied ABB habitat to avoid soil                      species listed as endangered or                       Plan in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and
                                              compaction;                                             threatened under the ESA. The ESA                     Texas, as required under the Clean Air
                                                 • Increasing safety during operation                 defines ‘‘take’’ as ‘‘to harass, harm,                Act, section 309. The EPA is charged
                                              fluid use and storage;                                  pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,               with reviewing all Federal agencies’
                                                 • Limiting disturbance from                          capture, or collect listed animal species,            EISs and commenting on the adequacy
                                              mechanical vegetation management;                       or attempt to engage in such conduct’’                and acceptability of the environmental
                                                 • Limiting the use of artificial lighting            (16 U.S.C. 1533). The term ‘‘harm’’ is                impacts of proposed actions in EISs.
                                              in occupied ABB habitat; and                            defined in the regulations as significant               The EPA also serves as the repository
                                                 • Providing a training program for all               habitat modification or degradation that              (EIS database) for EISs that Federal
                                              personnel conducting or supervising                     results in death or injury to listed                  agencies prepare. All EISs must be filed
                                              covered activities that may disturb ABB-                species by significantly impairing                    with EPA, which publishes a notice of
                                              occupied habitat.                                       essential behavioral patterns, including              availability on Fridays in the Federal
                                                 The mitigation measures include the                  breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR              Register. For more information, see
                                              following commitments:                                  17.3). However, we may, under                         https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may
                                                 • Relieve soil compaction by disking                 specified circumstances, issue permits                search for EPA comments on EISs, along
                                              (mechanically breaking up) compacted                    that allow the take of federally listed               with EISs themselves, at https://
                                              soil in laydown areas and material                      species, provided that the take is                    cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
                                              storage areas;                                          incidental to, but not the purpose of,                action/eis/search.
                                                 • Revegetate with a native species                   otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
                                              composition similar to that of the                      governing ITPs for endangered and                     Authority
                                              surrounding area (typically warm                        threatened species are at 50 CFR 17.22                  We provide this notice under section
                                              season grasses) or of the same vegetation               and 17.32, respectively.                              10(c) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
                                              type that existed prior to impacts for                     On July 3, 2018, we published a                    and its implementing regulations (50
                                              areas that experienced ground                           Federal Register notice announcing the                CFR 17.22 and 17.32) and NEPA (42
                                              disturbance causing temporary or                        availability for public review of a draft             U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its
                                              permanent cover change habitat                          EIS and requested public comment on                   implementing regulations (40 CFR
                                              impacts; and                                            our evaluation of the potential impacts               1506.6).
                                                 • Establish off-site habitat mitigation              associated with issuance of an ITP for
                                              for temporary or permanent cover                                                                              Amy L. Lueders,
                                                                                                      implementation of the HCP and to
                                              change and permanent impacts.                           evaluate alternatives (82 FR 32861). In               Regional Director, Southwest Region,
                                                 In addition to this notice, the                                                                            Albuquerque, New Mexico.
                                                                                                      July and August 2018, we held public
                                              Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)                                                                         [FR Doc. 2018–22833 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                      meetings on the draft document in
                                              is publishing a notice announcing the                   Tulsa, OK; McAlester, OK; Fort Smith,                 BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
                                              EIS, as required under the Clean Air                    AR; and Texarkana, TX. The public
                                              Act, section 309 (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.;               comment period closed on August 17,
                                              see EPA’s Role in the EIS Process                                                                             DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                                                                      2018.
                                              below).                                                    We received 10 comments in total: 8                Fish and Wildlife Service
                                                                                                      Through regulations.gov, 1 comment via
                                              Background                                                                                                    [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2018–0079;
                                                                                                      email, and 1 through the U.S. mail. The
                                                 The applicant has applied for an ITP                 final EIS provides responses to those                 FXES11140400000–178–FF04EF2000]
                                              under the ESA that would authorize                      comments in Appendix G.
                                              incidental take of the ABB and would be                                                                       Eastern Collier Property Owners, LLC,
                                              in effect for a period of 30 years. The                 Decision                                              Multi-Species Habitat Conservation
                                              proposed incidental take of the ABB                        We intend to issue an ITP allowing                 Plan and Draft Environmental Impact
                                              would occur from lawful, non-Federal                    the applicant to implement the                        Statement, Collier County, Florida
                                              activities from the applicant’s repair,                 proposed HCP, identified as the                       AGENCY:   Fish and Wildlife Service,
                                              maintenance, and construction activities                preferred alternative (Alternative B) in              Interior.
                                              for electrical lines and support facilities             the final EIS. We determined that the                 ACTION: Notice of availability; request
                                              (e.g., substations and switching                        preferred alternative best balances the               for comments.
                                              facilities) within the plan area, as well               protection and management of habitat
                                              as from activities carried out as part of               for the ABB, while allowing the                       SUMMARY:   We, the U.S. Fish and
                                              the HCP’s conservation strategy                         applicant to supply the public’s energy               Wildlife Service, announce the
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                              (covered activities). The HCP plan area                 needs. We based our decision on a                     availability of our draft environmental
                                              includes Oklahoma and Arkansas                          thorough review of the alternatives and               impact statement (EIS) and a habitat
                                              counties within known ABB ranges and                    their environmental consequences.                     conservation plan (HCP) associated with
                                              Texas counties with ABB occurrence                      Implementing this decision entails                    the incidental take permit (ITP)
                                              records. The plan area also includes                    issuing an ITP to American Electric                   applications of eleven Collier County
                                              counties in these States where the                      Power and full implementation of the                  landowners under the Endangered
                                              ABB’s range could expand over the ITP                   HCP, including minimization and                       Species Act of 1973, as amended. Each


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:25 Oct 18, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00052   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM   19OCN1



Document Created: 2018-10-19 01:25:48
Document Modified: 2018-10-19 01:25:48
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability.
DatesWe will finalize a record of decision and issue a permit no sooner than November 19, 2018.
ContactJonna Polk, Field Supervisor, via U.S. mail at Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 9014 E. 21st St., Tulsa, OK 74129; or via phone at 918-581-7458.
FR Citation83 FR 53077 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR