83 FR 54775 - Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for a General Management Plan Amendment, Point Reyes National Seashore and North District of Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Marin County, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 211 (October 31, 2018)
National Park Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 211 (October 31, 2018)
| Page Range | 54775-54777 | |
| FR Document | 2018-23807 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 54775-54777] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-23807] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-PWR-PWRO-26857; PPWONRADE2, PMP00EI05.YP0000] Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for a General Management Plan Amendment, Point Reyes National Seashore and North District of Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Marin County, California AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is preparing a General Management Plan Amendment (GMP Amendment) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for all lands currently under agricultural lease/ permits within Point Reyes National Seashore and the north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area. DATES: The NPS requests that comments be submitted by November 30, 2018. Open houses will be announced in local media. ADDRESSES: Information will be available for public review online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA and in the Office of the Superintendent, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 (415- 464-5120, telephone). You may submit your comments by any one of several methods. You may comment online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA. You may mail or hand deliver comments to the Superintendent, Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956. Written comments will also be accepted at the public open houses. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Gunn, Outreach Coordinator, Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 (415-464-5131, telephone). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) (NEPA), and the terms of a Settlement Agreement approved by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on July 14, 2017 (Resource Renewal Institute et al., v. National Park Service, Case No. 16-cv-00688-SBA (KAW) (N.D. Cal.)) (Agreement), the NPS is preparing an EIS for lands currently leased for ranching within Point Reyes National Seashore and the north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (planning area). In preparing the EIS, the NPS will follow all applicable laws and policies and will comply with the terms of the Agreement. The Agreement requires the EIS to address the statutory elements for General Management Plans, unless inapplicable, and to consider three specific alternatives. The EIS will amend the 1980 GMP for the planning area. This notice also terminates the GMP EIS process for Point Reyes National Seashore initiated by the NPS on October 14, 1997 (62 FR 53336), updated on May 24, 1999 (64 FR 28008), and expanded to include the north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area lands on February 3, 2000 (65 FR 5365-5366). Background Legislation authorizing the establishment of Point Reyes National Seashore (Point Reyes or Seashore) was enacted in 1962 (16 U.S.C. 459c) for the purpose of preserving ``a portion of the diminishing seashore of the United States that remains undeveloped.'' The Seashore includes more than 71,000 acres of beaches, coastal cliffs and headlands, marine terraces, coastal uplands, forests, and includes all tide and submerged lands to 0.25 miles offshore. The Seashore administers an additional 15,000 acres of the north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (Golden Gate NRA) under a Regional Directive for Management. Congress established Golden Gate NRA in 1972 and expanded it in 1980 to include lands within the planning area. The Golden Gate NRA legislation directs the NPS ``to preserve for public use and enjoyment certain areas of Marin and San Francisco Counties, California, possessing outstanding natural, historic, scenic, and recreational values . . . .'' and to ``preserve the recreation area, as far as possible, in its natural setting, and protect it from development and uses which would destroy the scenic beauty and natural character of the area.'' 16 U.S.C. 460bb. Specific provisions of both the Point Reyes and Golden Gate NRA enabling legislation (16 U.S.C. 459c-5 and 460bb-2(j)) authorize the issuance of lease/special use permits (lease/permits) for agricultural, ranching, or dairying purposes. Approximately 28,000 acres of National Park Service lands, including 18,000 acres of Point Reyes National Seashore and 10,000 acres within the north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area, are currently utilized for beef and dairy ranching under agricultural lease/permits. In the spring of 2014, the NPS initiated development of a Ranch Comprehensive Management Plan to address high priority management needs associated with the approximately 28,000 acres of active beef and dairy ranching on NPS lands within Point Reyes and the north district of Golden Gate NRA. The planning effort also addressed concerns related to the expansion of free-range tule elk into the park ranch lands, as well as other issues including lease duration, succession, and ranch operational flexibility and diversification. In February 2016, litigation was brought against the NPS related to the ranch planning process and the ongoing use of lands within the planning area for ranching and dairying. The plaintiffs and the NPS, together with the ranchers and the County of Marin, entered into settlement negotiations in an effort to resolve the litigation. As referenced in the Supplementary Information section above, a multi- party Agreement was approved by the U.S. District Court on July 14, 2017. Per the Agreement, the NPS agreed that in lieu of the Ranch Comprehensive Management Plan, the NPS would prepare a GMP Amendment and EIS addressing the management of the lands currently leased for ranching [[Page 54776]] within the Seashore and the north district of Golden Gate NRA. Purpose and Need Purpose The purpose of the EIS for the General Management Plan Amendment is to establish guidance for the preservation of natural and cultural resources and the management of infrastructure and visitor use within the planning area. The alternatives evaluated in the EIS will also address the future management of tule elk and leased ranch lands. Need Action is needed at this time to address the park's highest priority planning issues which include the management of approximately 28,000 acres of land currently leased for ranching. Action is also needed to comply with the terms of the Agreement which requires that the GMP Amendment and EIS be completed on or before July 14, 2021. Alternatives The Agreement requires the NPS to give full consideration to and disclose the impacts of three alternatives: (1) No ranching; (2) no dairy ranching; and (3) reduced ranching. These alternatives must not be conditioned on the discretionary termination of agricultural lease/ permits by ranchers. The Agreement expressly preserves the NPS's right to give full consideration to other potential action alternatives. It also allows the NPS to consider agricultural diversification, increased operational flexibility, the promotion of sustainable operational practices, succession planning, and similar ranch management practices as part of any action alternative, except the no ranching alternative. Each of the action alternatives considered in the EIS must also address the four statutorily required elements for GMPs, to the extent applicable. These elements are: Measures to preserve park resources, guidance regarding the types and levels of public use and development, discussion of visitor carrying capacities, and potential external boundary modifications. Elements Common to All Action Alternatives The NPS would identify opportunities to improve the visitor experience in the planning area such as enhanced trail connections, improved signage, and new interpretive waysides. The NPS would identify broad management strategies that would be undertaken to preserve park resources, as well as indicators and standards to guide visitor carrying capacities. The NPS has done some initial boundary analysis and does not expect to propose any external boundary modifications under any of the alternatives. Proposed Action--Based on the purpose and need for action, the NPS proposed action includes the Elements Common to All Action Alternatives and the following additional elements:Issue agricultural lease/permits with 20 year terms to existing ranch families to continue beef and dairy operations on approximately 27,000 acres within the planning area. The proposed action would include opportunities for operational flexibility and diversification, establish approximately 900 acres of resource protection buffers, and provide programmatic review of best management practices. Implement a land management framework on ranch lands allowing for different intensities of land use depending on the zone (ranch core, pasture, and range). Diversification activities (e.g. poultry) would be allowed in the ranch core zone. Pasture areas would allow for some increased pasture management activities. Range areas would be dedicated to livestock grazing. Take actions to minimize elk-related impacts including: Hazing, fence repair and modification, water development, habitat improvement, and other measures as appropriate. The Drakes Beach free- range tule elk herd would be managed at a level compatible with authorized ranching operations. The NPS would manage within that range using translocation outside of the park if practicable, or agency- managed lethal removal methods. Additionally, the NPS will evaluate management of tule elk from the Limantour free-range herd if they affect ranchlands. The proposed action represents one alternative that will be considered during the EIS process, and it will be further developed and refined throughout the process. In addition to the proposed action, the NPS is considering the following additional alternative concepts. No Action--This alternative is required by NEPA and would continue the issuance of short-term agricultural lease/permits for ongoing activities, with limited management of free-range tule elk affecting park ranch lands, consistent with current management. This alternative would continue to maintain existing operations, management of park resources and visitor use generally at current levels. The NPS would maintain the existing Seashore boundary. Under this alternative, beef and dairy ranching operations would continue to be authorized on approximately 27,000 acres within the planning area under 5 and 10 year agricultural lease/permits. Action Alternatives Continued Ranching and Removal of the Drakes Beach Tule Elk Herd-- Existing ranch families would be authorized to continue beef and dairy operations under agricultural lease/permits as described in the proposed action. Under this alternative, the Drakes Beach tule elk herd would be removed using translocation outside of the park if practicable, or agency-managed lethal methods. The NPS would continue to manage the Limantour herd as in the proposed action. Under this alternative, approximately 27,000 acres of beef and dairy ranching operations would be authorized under agricultural lease/permits within the planning area. Reduced Ranching and Management of the Drakes Beach Tule Elk Herd-- A reduced ranching alternative is required by the Agreement. Under this alternative, cessation of grazing operations would occur on approximately 7,500 acres within the planning area. The areas identified for closure to grazing would minimize the overall impact to the Point Reyes Peninsula Dairy Ranches Historic District and Olema Valley Dairy Ranches Historic District. Most of the areas identified for closure do not have developed complexes or permitted residential uses. For areas remaining in agricultural use, agricultural lease/ permits would be offered as described under the proposed action. Tule elk would be managed consistent with the actions described in the proposed action but under population targets commensurate with the level of ranching operations in this alternative. Under this alternative, approximately 19,500 acres of beef and dairy ranching operations would be authorized under agricultural lease/permits within the planning area. No Dairy Ranching and Limited Management of the Drakes Beach Tule Elk Herd--A no dairy ranching alternative is required by the Agreement. Under this alternative, all beef cattle grazing operations would continue. The six active dairies within Point Reyes would cease operations. Dairy operators would be eligible to convert operations to beef cattle grazing over a period of 5 years. For areas remaining in agricultural use, agricultural lease/permits would be offered as described above for the proposed action. The NPS would take [[Page 54777]] limited action to manage the geographic extent of all free-range tule elk, but only where management is needed to support other resource protection and park goals. Under this alternative, approximately 27,000 acres of beef grazing operations would be authorized under agricultural lease/permits within the planning area. No Ranching and Expansion of Tule Elk in the Planning Area--A no ranching alternative is required by the Agreement. Under this alternative, ranching in all areas of the Seashore and the north district of Golden Gate NRA would cease. With the exception of the two locations with life-estates, most operations would be phased out over a period of 5 years. The NPS anticipates many of the areas and their associated facilities would be converted and offered for public not- for-profit education, research and outdoor experiential activities and other public recreation and visitor opportunities. The EIS will evaluate these actions at the programmatic level. The NPS would take limited action to manage the geographic extent of the free-range tule elk herd, but only where management is needed to support other resource protection and park goals. Each of the action alternatives will also include the Elements Common to All Action Alternatives. The alternative concepts and management tools under consideration may change based upon input received during public scoping and throughout the development of the EIS. The NPS will also consider other alternatives that are suggested during the scoping period, as appropriate. The NPS will not select an alternative for implementation until after a final EIS is completed. Public Comment How to Provide Comments--During the scoping period, maps and other project information will be available on the project's website (http://parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA). Public open houses will be conducted to provide an opportunity for the public to share their comments and learn more about activities within the planning area. Details regarding the exact times and locations of these meetings will be announced on the project website and through local and regional media. The meetings will also be announced through email notification to individuals and organizations on the initial distribution list. If you wish to comment on the purpose, need, preliminary alternatives, or on any other issues associated with development of the draft GMP Amendment EIS, you may submit your comments by any one of several methods. The preferred method for commenting is online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA. You may also mail or hand deliver comments to the Superintendent, Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956. Written comments will also be accepted at the public open houses. Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or by any method other than those specified above. Bulk comments in any format (hard copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of others will not be accepted. Public Availability of Comments--Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment-- including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7. Dated: October 19, 2018. Colin Smith, Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 2018-23807 Filed 10-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Notices 54775
written protest 30 calendar days from http://parkplanning.nps.gov/ offshore. The Seashore administers an
the date of this publication at the POREGMPA and in the Office of the additional 15,000 acres of the north
address listed in the ADDRESSES section Superintendent, 1 Bear Valley Road, district of Golden Gate National
of this notice. A statement of reasons for Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 (415– Recreation Area (Golden Gate NRA)
the protest may be filed with the notice 464–5120, telephone). You may submit under a Regional Directive for
of protest and must be filed within 30 your comments by any one of several Management. Congress established
calendar days after the protest is filed. methods. You may comment online at Golden Gate NRA in 1972 and expanded
If a protest against a survey is received http://parkplanning.nps.gov/ it in 1980 to include lands within the
prior to the date of official filing, the POREGMPA. You may mail or hand planning area. The Golden Gate NRA
filing will be stayed pending deliver comments to the legislation directs the NPS ‘‘to preserve
consideration of the protest. A plat will Superintendent, Point Reyes National for public use and enjoyment certain
not be officially filed until the day after Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point areas of Marin and San Francisco
all protests have been dismissed or Reyes Station, CA 94956. Written Counties, California, possessing
otherwise resolved. comments will also be accepted at the outstanding natural, historic, scenic,
Before including your address, phone public open houses. and recreational values . . . .’’ and to
number, email address, or other FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ‘‘preserve the recreation area, as far as
personal identifying information in your Melanie Gunn, Outreach Coordinator, possible, in its natural setting, and
comment, please be aware that your Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear protect it from development and uses
entire protest, including your personal Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA which would destroy the scenic beauty
identifying information may be made 94956 (415–464–5131, telephone). and natural character of the area.’’ 16
publicly available at any time. While SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant U.S.C. 460bb.
you can ask us in your comment to to the National Environmental Policy Specific provisions of both the Point
withhold your personal identifying Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) Reyes and Golden Gate NRA enabling
information from public review, we (NEPA), and the terms of a Settlement legislation (16 U.S.C. 459c–5 and
cannot guarantee that we will be able to Agreement approved by the U.S. District 460bb–2(j)) authorize the issuance of
do so. Court for the Northern District of lease/special use permits (lease/permits)
A copy of the described plats will be for agricultural, ranching, or dairying
California on July 14, 2017 (Resource
placed in the open files, and available purposes. Approximately 28,000 acres
Renewal Institute et al., v. National Park
to the public as a matter of information. of National Park Service lands,
Service, Case No. 16–cv–00688–SBA
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3. (KAW) (N.D. Cal.)) (Agreement), the including 18,000 acres of Point Reyes
NPS is preparing an EIS for lands National Seashore and 10,000 acres
Leon W. Chmura,
currently leased for ranching within within the north district of Golden Gate
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor. National Recreation Area, are currently
Point Reyes National Seashore and the
[FR Doc. 2018–23825 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am] utilized for beef and dairy ranching
north district of Golden Gate National
BILLING CODE 4310–GJ–P
Recreation Area (planning area). In under agricultural lease/permits.
preparing the EIS, the NPS will follow In the spring of 2014, the NPS
all applicable laws and policies and will initiated development of a Ranch
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Comprehensive Management Plan to
comply with the terms of the
National Park Service Agreement. The Agreement requires the address high priority management needs
EIS to address the statutory elements for associated with the approximately
[NPS–PWR–PWRO–26857; PPWONRADE2, General Management Plans, unless 28,000 acres of active beef and dairy
PMP00EI05.YP0000] ranching on NPS lands within Point
inapplicable, and to consider three
specific alternatives. The EIS will Reyes and the north district of Golden
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
amend the 1980 GMP for the planning Gate NRA. The planning effort also
Environmental Impact Statement for a
area. addressed concerns related to the
General Management Plan
This notice also terminates the GMP expansion of free-range tule elk into the
Amendment, Point Reyes National
EIS process for Point Reyes National park ranch lands, as well as other issues
Seashore and North District of Golden
Seashore initiated by the NPS on including lease duration, succession,
Gate National Recreation Area, Marin
October 14, 1997 (62 FR 53336), and ranch operational flexibility and
County, California
updated on May 24, 1999 (64 FR 28008), diversification.
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. and expanded to include the north In February 2016, litigation was
ACTION: Notice of intent. district of Golden Gate National brought against the NPS related to the
Recreation Area lands on February 3, ranch planning process and the ongoing
SUMMARY: The National Park Service 2000 (65 FR 5365–5366). use of lands within the planning area for
(NPS) is preparing a General ranching and dairying. The plaintiffs
Management Plan Amendment (GMP Background and the NPS, together with the ranchers
Amendment) and Environmental Impact Legislation authorizing the and the County of Marin, entered into
Statement (EIS) for all lands currently establishment of Point Reyes National settlement negotiations in an effort to
under agricultural lease/permits within Seashore (Point Reyes or Seashore) was resolve the litigation. As referenced in
Point Reyes National Seashore and the enacted in 1962 (16 U.S.C. 459c) for the the Supplementary Information section
north district of Golden Gate National purpose of preserving ‘‘a portion of the above, a multi-party Agreement was
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Recreation Area. diminishing seashore of the United approved by the U.S. District Court on
DATES: The NPS requests that comments States that remains undeveloped.’’ The July 14, 2017. Per the Agreement, the
be submitted by November 30, 2018. Seashore includes more than 71,000 NPS agreed that in lieu of the Ranch
Open houses will be announced in local acres of beaches, coastal cliffs and Comprehensive Management Plan, the
media. headlands, marine terraces, coastal NPS would prepare a GMP Amendment
ADDRESSES: Information will be uplands, forests, and includes all tide and EIS addressing the management of
available for public review online at and submerged lands to 0.25 miles the lands currently leased for ranching
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Oct 30, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_54986/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Notices 54777
limited action to manage the geographic comments by any one of several submissions pursuant to Commission
extent of all free-range tule elk, but only methods. The preferred method for rules.
where management is needed to support commenting is online at http:// FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
other resource protection and park parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA. You Houda Morad, Office of the General
goals. Under this alternative, may also mail or hand deliver Counsel, U.S. International Trade
approximately 27,000 acres of beef comments to the Superintendent, Point Commission, 500 E Street SW,
grazing operations would be authorized Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
under agricultural lease/permits within Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956. 708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
the planning area. Written comments will also be accepted documents filed in connection with this
No Ranching and Expansion of Tule at the public open houses. Comments investigation are or will be available for
Elk in the Planning Area—A no will not be accepted by fax, email, or by inspection during official business
ranching alternative is required by the any method other than those specified hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Agreement. Under this alternative, above. Bulk comments in any format Office of the Secretary, U.S.
ranching in all areas of the Seashore and (hard copy or electronic) submitted on International Trade Commission, 500 E
the north district of Golden Gate NRA behalf of others will not be accepted. Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
would cease. With the exception of the Public Availability of Comments— telephone (202) 205–2000. General
two locations with life-estates, most Before including your address, phone information concerning the Commission
operations would be phased out over a number, email address, or other may be obtained by accessing its
period of 5 years. The NPS anticipates personal identifying information in your internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
many of the areas and their associated comment, you should be aware that The public record for this investigation
facilities would be converted and your entire comment—including your may also be viewed on the
offered for public not-for-profit personal identifying information—may Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
education, research and outdoor be made publicly available at any time. at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-
experiential activities and other public While you can ask us in your comment impaired persons are advised that
recreation and visitor opportunities. The to withhold your personal identifying
EIS will evaluate these actions at the information on this matter can be
information from public review, we obtained by contacting the
programmatic level. The NPS would cannot guarantee that we will be able to
take limited action to manage the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
do so. 205–1810.
geographic extent of the free-range tule
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
elk herd, but only where management is
needed to support other resource Dated: October 19, 2018. 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
protection and park goals. Colin Smith, amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
Each of the action alternatives will Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region, 337’’), provides that if the Commission
also include the Elements Common to National Park Service. finds a violation, it shall exclude the
All Action Alternatives. The alternative [FR Doc. 2018–23807 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am] articles concerned from the United
concepts and management tools under BILLING CODE 4312–52–P States unless, after considering the
consideration may change based upon effect of such exclusion upon the public
input received during public scoping health and welfare, competitive
and throughout the development of the INTERNATIONAL TRADE conditions in the United States
EIS. The NPS will also consider other COMMISSION economy, the production of like or
alternatives that are suggested during directly competitive articles in the
the scoping period, as appropriate. The [Investigation No. 337–TA–1074] United States, and United States
NPS will not select an alternative for consumers, it finds that such articles
Certain Industrial Automation Systems should not be excluded from entry. 19
implementation until after a final EIS is
and Components Thereof Including U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar provision
completed.
Control Systems, Controllers, applies to cease and desist orders. 19
Public Comment Visualization Hardware, Motion and U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
How to Provide Comments—During Motor Control Systems, Networking The Commission is soliciting
the scoping period, maps and other Equipment, Safety Devices, and Power comments on public interest issues
project information will be available on Supplies; Notice of Request for raised by the recommended relief,
the project’s website (http:// Statements on the Public Interest should the Commission find a violation,
parkplanning.nps.gov/POREGMPA). AGENCY: U.S. International Trade i.e.: (1) A general exclusion order
Public open houses will be conducted to Commission. (‘‘GEO’’) against certain industrial
provide an opportunity for the public to ACTION: Notice. automation systems and components
share their comments and learn more thereof including control systems,
about activities within the planning SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that controllers, visualization hardware,
area. Details regarding the exact times the presiding administrative law judge motion and motor control systems,
and locations of these meetings will be has issued a final Initial Determination networking equipment, safety devices,
announced on the project website and on section 337 violation and a and power supplies; and (2) a cease and
through local and regional media. The Recommended Determination on desist order (‘‘CDO’’) against one of the
meetings will also be announced remedy and bonding in the above- defaulted respondents, namely,
through email notification to captioned investigation. The Fractioni (Hongkong) Ltd.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
individuals and organizations on the Commission is soliciting comments on The Commission is interested in
initial distribution list. public interest issues raised by the further development of the record on
If you wish to comment on the recommended relief, should the the public interest in this investigation.
purpose, need, preliminary alternatives, Commission find a section 337 Accordingly, parties are to file public
or on any other issues associated with violation. This notice is soliciting public interest submissions pursuant to
development of the draft GMP interest comments from the public only. pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). In
Amendment EIS, you may submit your Parties are to file public interest addition, members of the public are
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Oct 30, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_54986/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-31 00:34:03
Document Modified: 2018-10-31 00:34:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of intent. | |
| Dates | The NPS requests that comments be submitted by November 30, 2018. Open houses will be announced in local media. | |
| Contact | Melanie Gunn, Outreach Coordinator, Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 (415-464-5131, telephone). | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 54775 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR