83_FR_55500 83 FR 55286 - Utah: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions, Codification and Incorporation by Reference

83 FR 55286 - Utah: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions, Codification and Incorporation by Reference

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 214 (November 5, 2018)

Page Range55286-55292
FR Document2018-24062

Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the State of Utah's Underground Storage Tank (UST) program submitted by the State. The EPA has determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for program approval. This action also codifies the EPA's approval of Utah's state program and incorporates by reference those provisions of the State's regulations that we have determined meet the requirements for approval. The State's federally-authorized and codified UST program, as revised pursuant to this action, will remain subject to the EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA subtitle I and other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 214 (Monday, November 5, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55286-55292]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24062]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 282

[EPA-R08-UST-2018-0169; FRL-9982-18-Region 8]


Utah: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program 
Revisions, Codification and Incorporation by Reference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA 
or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to approve revisions to the State of Utah's Underground 
Storage Tank (UST) program submitted by the State. The EPA has 
determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for 
program approval. This action also codifies the EPA's approval of 
Utah's state program and incorporates by reference those provisions of 
the State's regulations that we have determined meet the requirements 
for approval. The State's federally-authorized and codified UST 
program, as revised pursuant to this action, will remain subject to the 
EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under sections 9005 and 
9006 of RCRA subtitle I and other applicable statutory and regulatory 
provisions.

DATES: This rule is effective January 4, 2019, unless the EPA receives 
adverse comment by December 5, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, 
it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing 
the public that the rule will not take effect. The incorporation by 
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved 
by the Director of the Federal Register, as of January 4, 2019, in 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments.
    2. Email: [email protected].
    3. Mail: Matthew Langenfeld, Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid 
Waste and PCB Unit, Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, Office 
of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance (8P-R), EPA Region 8, 1595 
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
    4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Matthew 
Langenfeld, Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid Waste and PCB Unit, 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, Office of Partnerships and 
Regulatory Assistance (8P-R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-UST-
2018-0169. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be available online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov, or email. The federal http://www.regulations.gov 
website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not 
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the 
body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA 
without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address 
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that 
is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If 
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include 
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and 
with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment 
due to technical difficulties, and cannot contact you for 
clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. 
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form 
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    You can view and copy the documents that form the basis for this 
action and associated publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday at the following location: EPA Region 
8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, phone number (303) 
312-6284. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should 
make an appointment with the office at least 2 days in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Langenfeld, (303) 312-6284, 
[email protected]. To inspect the hard copy materials, please 
schedule an appointment with Matthew Langenfeld at (303) 312-6284.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Approval of Revisions to Utah's Underground Storage Tank Program

A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?

    States which have received final approval from the EPA under RCRA 
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain an 
underground storage tank program that is equivalent to, consistent 
with, and no less stringent than the federal underground storage tank 
program. When the EPA makes revisions to the regulations that govern 
the UST program, states must revise their programs to comply with the 
updated regulations and submit these revisions to the EPA for approval. 
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to 
the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 280. 
States can also initiate changes on their own to their underground 
storage tank program and these changes must then be approved by the 
EPA.

B. What decisions has the EPA made in this rule?

    On February 28, 2018, in accordance with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Utah 
submitted a complete program revision application seeking the EPA 
approval for its UST program revisions (State Application). Utah's 
revisions correspond to the EPA final rule published on July 15, 2015 
(80 FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST regulations and the 1988 
state program approval (SPA) regulations (2015 Federal Revisions). As 
required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State Application contains the 
following: A transmittal letter from the Governor requesting approval, 
a description of the program and operating procedures, a demonstration 
of the State's procedures to ensure adequate enforcement, a Memorandum 
of Agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of the EPA and 
the implementing agency, a statement of certification from the Attorney 
General, and copies of all relevant state statutes and regulations. We 
have reviewed the State Application and determined that the revisions 
to Utah's UST program are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less 
stringent

[[Page 55287]]

than the corresponding federal requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR part 
281, and that the Utah program provides for adequate enforcement of 
compliance (40 CFR 281.11(b)). Therefore, the EPA grants Utah final 
approval to operate its UST program with the changes described in the 
program revision application, and as outlined below in Section I.G of 
this document.

C. What is the effect of this action on the regulated community?

    This action does not impose additional requirements on the 
regulated community because the regulations being approved by this rule 
are already in effect in the State of Utah, and are not changed by this 
action. This action merely approves the existing state regulations as 
meeting the federal requirements and renders them federally 
enforceable.

D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?

    The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior 
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and we 
anticipate no adverse comment. Utah did not receive any comments during 
its comment period when the rules and regulations being considered 
today were proposed at the state level.

E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?

    Along with this direct final rule, the EPA is publishing a separate 
document in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register 
that serves as the proposal to approve the State's UST program 
revisions, and provides an opportunity for public comment. If EPA 
receives comments that oppose this approval, the EPA will withdraw this 
direct final rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register 
before it becomes effective. The EPA will base any further decision on 
approval of the State Application after considering all comments 
received during the comment period. The EPA will then address all 
public comments in a later final rule. You may not have another 
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this approval, you 
must do so at this time.

F. For what has Utah previously been approved?

    On April 7, 1995, the EPA finalized a rule approving the UST 
program that Utah proposed to administer in lieu of the federal UST 
program. On December 5, 1995, the EPA codified the provisions of the 
approved Utah program that are part of the underground storage tank 
program under subtitle I of RCRA, and therefore are subject to the 
EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under RCRA sections 9005 
and 9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991d and 6991e, and other applicable statutory and 
regulatory provisions.

G. What changes are we approving with this action and what standards do 
we use for review?

    In order to be approved, each state program application must meet 
the general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11, and specific requirements in 
40 CFR Subpart B (Components of a Program Application); Subpart C 
(Criteria for No Less Stringent); and Subpart D (Adequate Enforcement 
of Compliance). This also is true for proposed revisions to approved 
state programs.
    As more fully described below, the State has made the changes to 
its approved UST program to reflect the 2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA 
is approving the State's changes because they are equivalent to, 
consistent with, and no less stringent than the federal UST program and 
because the EPA has confirmed that the Utah UST program will continue 
to provide for adequate enforcement of compliance as described in 40 
CFR 281.11(b) and part 281, Subpart D after this approval.
    The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of 
Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) is the lead implementing 
agency for the UST program in Utah, except in Indian country.
    The DERR continues to have broad statutory authority to regulate 
the installation, operation, maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well 
as UST releases under Utah Statutes (2018), Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 
4--Underground Storage Tank Act, Sections 401-429. The Utah UST Program 
gets its enforcement authority from the powers and duties of the DERR 
Director (Director) found in Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4, Sections 
404(f), 404(j) and 425(2). Under Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4, Section 
404(k) the Director is authorized to require an owner to furnish 
records, conduct monitoring or testing, and provide access to tanks. 
The Director is authorized to issue a Notice of Intent to Revoke and 
Order to Revoke Certificates of Compliance under Title 19, Chapter 6, 
Part 4, Section 414. Certificates of Compliance lapse automatically if 
annual registration fees are not paid under Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 
4, Section 408(5)(c). Penalties for non-compliance with Utah's UST Act 
may be assessed under Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4, Section 425(1). A 
delivery prohibition tag may be placed on a tank for failure to have a 
certificate of compliance, spill and overfill prevention, and required 
tank and/or piping leak detection or corrosion protection.
    Specific authorities to regulate the installation, operation, 
maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well as UST releases are found 
under Utah Administrative Code (UAC), as amended effective January 1, 
2017, R311-200 through R311-212, Underground Storage Tanks; Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements are found under UAC R311-202-280.34; 
Environmental Quality Administrative Rules are found under UAC, as 
amended February 1, 2018, R305-1 through R305-9; and maintenance and 
management of records for individual sites and projects is required 
under Utah Statutes (2008), Title 63G, Chapter 2, Part 1 through Part 
9. The aforementioned statutory sections and regulations satisfy the 
requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
    Through a Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Utah and the 
EPA, effective June 27, 2017, the State maintains procedures for 
receiving and ensuring proper consideration of information about 
violations submitted by the public. The State agrees to comply with 
public participation provisions contained in 40 CFR 281.42 including 
the provision that the State will not oppose intervention under Rule 
24(a)(2) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the 
applicant's interest is adequately represented by the State. Utah has 
met the public participation requirements found in 40 CFR 281.42.
    To qualify for final approval, revisions to a state's program must 
be ``equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent'' than the 
2015 Federal Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions the EPA addressed 
UST systems deferred in the 1988 UST regulations, and added, among 
other things, new operation and maintenance requirements; secondary 
containment requirements for new and replaced tanks and piping; 
operator training requirements; and a requirement to ensure UST system 
compatibility before storing certain biofuel blends. In addition, the 
EPA removed past deferrals for emergency generator tanks, field 
constructed tanks, and airport hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes 
revisions to approved state programs pursuant to the criteria found in 
40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39.
    The DERR has revised its regulations to help ensure that the 
State's UST program revisions are equivalent to,

[[Page 55288]]

consistent with, and no less stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions. 
In particular, the DERR has amended Utah Administrative Code R311-202-1 
to incorporate by reference (into the Utah regulations) the 
requirements of 40 CFR part 280, including the requirements added by 
the 2015 Federal Revisions, except for 40 CFR Subpart J (Operator 
Training) and the definitions of Class A, B and C operators. (We note 
that R311-206-2(a)(2) also incorporates by reference the necessary 
requirements for financial responsibility for UST systems.) The State, 
therefore, has ensured that the criteria found in 40 CFR 281.30 through 
281.38 are met.
    Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the state operator training 
requirements that must be met in order to be considered equivalent to, 
consistent with, and no less stringent than federal requirements. Utah 
did not incorporate by reference federal requirements for operator 
training, and has promulgated and is implementing its own operator 
training provisions under Utah Administrative Code R311-201-12. After a 
thorough review, the EPA has determined that Utah's operator training 
requirements are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent 
than federal requirements.
    As part of the State Application the Utah Attorney General 
certified that the State revisions meet the requirements ``equivalent 
to, consistent with, and no less stringent'' criteria in 40 CFR 281.30 
through 281.39. The EPA is relying on this certification in addition to 
the analysis submitted by the State in making our determination.
    For further information on the EPA's analysis of the State's 
application, see the chart in the Technical Support Document (TSD) 
contained in the docket for this rulemaking.

H. Where are the revised rules different from the Federal rules?

Broader in Scope Provisions
    Where an approved state program has a greater scope of coverage 
than required by federal law, the additional coverage is not part of 
the federally-approved program and are not federally enforceable. (40 
CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)) The following statutory and regulatory 
requirements are considered broader in coverage than the federal 
program as these state-only regulations are not required by federal 
regulation and are implemented by the State in addition to the 
federally approved program:
    Utah Administrative Code R311-206-2(a)(1) and (b) allows owners and 
operators, meeting requirements for participation, to use the State-
only Environmental Assurance Program to demonstrate financial 
assurance.
    Under Utah Statutes, Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4--Underground 
Storage Tank Act, Section 412(6), certificates of compliance are 
required to operate regulated UST systems and are issued by the State 
for facilities that are registered, have financial assurance, comply 
with federal and state rules, and meet tank testing requirements. Under 
Utah Statutes, Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4--Underground Storage Tank 
Act, Section 411(7), the DERR Director shall issue certificates of 
compliance and the Waste Management and Radiation Control Board shall 
make rules for identifying USTs that do not qualify for a certificate 
of compliance.
    Under Utah Administrative Code R311-201-2, Utah requires that UST 
consultants, inspectors, testers, installers, removers, and groundwater 
and soil samplers be certified by the State. Under Utah Administrative 
Code R311-201-2, Utah allows individuals to apply for certification, 
and under Utah Administrative Code R311-201-4, Utah lists eligibility 
requirements for certification of UST consultants, inspectors, testers, 
and installers. Under Utah Administrative Code R311-203-3, Utah 
requires certified installers to pay a permit fee for installation at 
facilities that do not qualify for a certificate of compliance and to 
notify the DERR Director of the completion of installation. Under Utah 
Administrative Code R311-201-5 through 10, Utah allows for renewal of 
certificates, provides standards of performance, gives the DERR 
Director the ability to deny certification, and allows for appeal, 
inactivation, revocation, and reciprocity.
    Under Utah Administrative Code R311-203-3, Utah requires installers 
to provide notification to the State 10 days prior to installation of 
UST systems and components, and requires an UST installation permit 
fee. Under Utah Administrative Code R311-203-4, Utah requires UST 
registration fees.
More Stringent Provisions
    Where an approved state program includes requirements that are 
considered more stringent than required by federal law, the more 
stringent requirements become part of the federally approved program. 
(40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii))
    The following statutory and regulatory requirements are considered 
more stringent than the federal program, and on approval, they become 
part of the federally approved program and are federally enforceable:
    Under Utah Administrative Code R311-201-12(f), Utah requires third-
party Class B operators to be certified as UST testers, installers, or 
meet the requirements of certified UST inspectors. Under Utah 
Administrative Code R311-203-5, Utah requires that UST testers report 
test results. Under Utah Administrative Code R311-203-7(a), Utah 
requires that walkthrough inspections conducted under 40 CFR 280.36 be 
conducted by or under the direction of a Class B Operator. Under Utah 
Administrative Code R311-203-7(c), Utah requires UST facilites with 
temporarily closed tanks to conduct annual operator inspections. Under 
Utah Administrative Code R311-211-12(h)(2) and (3), Utah requires Class 
A and B operators to submit a registration application to the DERR 
Director, documenting proper training with its renewal registration 
application prior to expiration of their existing certification.

I. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Utah?

    The EPA's approval of Utah's Program does not extend to Indian 
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country generally includes 
lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian 
reservations located within Utah: The Washakie Reservation 
(Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation), reservation lands of the 
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah (Cedar Band of Paiutes, Kanosh Band of 
Paiutes, Koosharem Band of Paiutes, Indian Peaks Band of Paiutes, and 
Shivwits Band of Paiutes), the Skull Valley Indian Reservation, the 
Uintah & Ouray Reservation, the Goshute Reservation, and the Navajo 
Nation; any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian 
tribe; and any other areas that are ``Indian country'' within the 
meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151. Any lands removed from an Indian reservation 
status by federal court action are not considered reservation lands 
even if located within the exterior boundaries of an Indian 
reservation. The EPA will retain responsibilities under RCRA for 
underground storage tanks in Indian country. Therefore, this action has 
no effect in Indian country. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(2).

II. Codification

A. What is codification?

    Codification is the process of placing a state's statutes and 
regulations that comprise the state's approved UST program into the 
CFR. Section 9004(b) of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA to approve 
State UST programs to operate in lieu of the federal program.

[[Page 55289]]

The EPA codifies its authorization of state programs in 40 CFR part 282 
and incorporates by reference state regulations that the EPA will 
enforce under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA and any other applicable 
statutory provisions. The incorporation by reference of state 
authorized programs in the CFR should substantially enhance the 
public's ability to discern the current status of the approved state 
program and state requirements that can be federally enforced. This 
effort provides clear notice to the public of the scope of the approved 
program in each state.

B. What is the history of codification of Utah's UST program?

    The EPA incorporated by reference and codified Utah's then-approved 
UST program in 40 CFR 282.94, effective April 7, 1995 (60 FR 12709; 
March 8, 1995). Through this action, the EPA is incorporating by 
reference and codifying Utah's state program in 40 CFR 282.94 to 
include the approved revisions.

C. What codification decisions have we made in this rule?

    In this rule, we are finalizing the federal regulatory text that 
incorporates by reference the federally authorized Utah UST Program. In 
accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the 
incorporation by reference of the Utah rules described in the 
amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set forth below. The EPA has made, and 
will continue to make, these documents generally available through 
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 8 office (see the ADDRESSES 
section of this preamble for more information).
    One purpose of this Federal Register document is to codify Utah's 
approved UST program. The codification reflects the State program that 
would be in effect at the time the EPA's approved revisions to the Utah 
UST program addressed in this direct final rule become final. If, 
however, the EPA receives substantive comment on the proposed rule then 
this codification will not take effect, and the State rules that are 
approved after the EPA considers public comment will be codified 
instead. By codifying the approved Utah program and by amending the 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the public will more easily be able 
to discern the status of the federally-approved requirements of the 
Utah program.
    The EPA is incorporating by reference the Utah approved UST program 
in 40 CFR 282.94. Section 282.94(d)(1)(ii)(B) incorporates by reference 
for enforcement purposes the State's regulations. Section 282.94 also 
references the Attorney General's Statement, Demonstration of Adequate 
Enforcement Procedures, the Program Description, and the Memorandum of 
Agreement, which are approved as part of the UST program under subtitle 
I of RCRA.

D. What is the effect of EPA's codification of the federally authorized 
State UST Program on enforcement?

    The EPA retains the authority under sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006 
of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, and other 
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions to undertake corrective 
action, inspections, and enforcement actions, and to issue orders in 
approved States. If the EPA determines it will take such actions in 
Utah, the EPA will rely on federal sanctions, federal inspection 
authorities, and other federal procedures rather than the state 
analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has approved the State procedures 
listed in 40 CFR 282.94(d)(1)(ii), the EPA is not incorporating by 
reference Utah's procedural and enforcement authorities.

E. What State provisions are not part of the codification?

    The public also needs to be aware that some provisions of the 
State's UST program are not part of the federally approved State 
program. Such provisions are not part of the RCRA Subtitle I program 
because they are ``broader in coverage'' than Subtitle I of RCRA. Title 
40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii) states that where an approved state program has 
provisions that are broader in coverage than the federal program, those 
provisions are not a part of the federally approved program. As a 
result, State provisions which are ``broader in coverage'' than the 
federal program are not incorporated by reference for purposes of 
enforcement in part 282. Title 40 CFR 282.94(d)(1)(iii) lists for 
reference and clarity the Utah statutory and regulatory provisions 
which are ``broader in coverage'' than the federal program and which 
are not, therefore, part of the approved program being codified today. 
Provisions that are ``broader in coverage'' cannot be enforced by EPA; 
the State, however, will continue to implement and enforce such 
provisions under State law.

III. Statutory and Executive Order (E.O.) Reviews

    This action only applies to Utah's UST Program requirements 
pursuant to RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no requirements other than 
those imposed by State law. It complies with applicable EOs and 
statutory provisions as follows:

A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action 
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This action approves and 
codifies state requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 9004 and 
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling 
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 
3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as this final approval 
of Utah's revised underground storage tank program under RCRA are 
exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this 
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.).

C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Executive Order 13175: Consultation 
and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    Because this action approves and codifies pre-existing requirements 
under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty 
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded 
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as 
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or 
uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states, 
on the relationship between the national government and the states, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 
43255, Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely approves and codifies state 
requirements as part of the State RCRA Underground Storage Tank Program

[[Page 55290]]

without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by RCRA.

E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health and Safety Risks

    This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and 
it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety 
risks.

F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 
22, 2001) because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as 
defined under Executive Order 12866.

G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA grants a state's application 
for approval as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA. 
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it 
reviews a state approval application, to require the use of any 
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard 
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.

H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform

    As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, 
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the 
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize 
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected 
conduct.

I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With 
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights

    The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar. 
15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in 
accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for 
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued 
under the executive order.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes 
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States. Because this rule approves pre-
existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, consistent with, 
and no less stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there 
are no anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental 
effects, the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.

L. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides 
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule 
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each 
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United 
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect 
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This 
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). However, 
this action will be effective January 4, 2019 because it is a direct 
final rule.

    Authority: This rule is issued under the authority of Sections 
2002(a), 7004(b), and 9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste 
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 6991c, 
6991d, and 6991e.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, State program 
approval, and Underground storage tanks.

    Dated: October 26, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR 
part 282 as follows:

PART 282--APPROVED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 282 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.

0
2. Revise Sec.  282.94 to read as follows:


Sec.  282.94  Utah State-Administered Program.

    (a) History of the approval of Utah's Program. The State of Utah is 
approved to administer and enforce an underground storage tank program 
in lieu of the federal program under subtitle I of the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 
6991 et seq. The State's program, as administered by the Utah 
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Environmental 
Response and Remediation (DERR), was approved by EPA pursuant to 42 
U.S.C. 6991c and Part 281 of this Chapter. EPA published the notice of 
final determination approving the Utah underground storage tank base 
program effective on April 7, 1995. A subsequent program revision 
application was approved by EPA and became effective on January 4, 
2019.
    (b) Enforcement authority. Utah has primary responsibility for 
administering and enforcing its federally approved underground storage 
tank program. However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its 
corrective action, inspection, and enforcement authorities under 
sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006 of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 
6991b(h),6991d and 6991e, as well as under any other applicable 
statutory and regulatory provisions.
    (c) To retain program approval, Utah must revise its approved 
program to adopt new changes to the federal subtitle I program which 
make it more stringent, in accordance with section 9004 of RCRA, 42 
U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If Utah obtains approval 
for the revised requirements pursuant to section 9004 of RCRA, 42 
U.S.C. 6991c, the newly approved statutory and regulatory provisions 
will be added to this subpart and notice of any change will be 
published in the Federal Register.
    (d) Utah has final approval for the following elements of its 
program

[[Page 55291]]

application originally submitted to EPA and approved effective April 7, 
1995, and the program revision application approved by EPA effective on 
January 4, 2019:
    (1) State statutes and regulations--(i) Incorporation by reference. 
The Utah provisions cited in this paragraph, and listed in Appendix A 
to part 282, are incorporated by reference as part of the underground 
storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. 
The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by 
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may 
obtain copies of the Utah regulations that are incorporated by 
reference in this paragraph from Utah's Office of Administrative Rules, 
Office Coordinator, P.O. Box 141007, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-1007; 
Phone number: 801-538-3003; website: https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-adm-code/. You may inspect all approved material at 
the EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 (Phone 
number (303) 312-6284 or the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of the 
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    (A) Utah Statutory and Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the 
Underground Storage Tank Program, October 2018.
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) Legal basis. EPA evaluated the following statutes and 
regulations which provide the legal basis for the State's 
implementation of the underground storage tank program, but they are 
not being incorporated by reference and do not replace Federal 
authorities:
    (A) The statutory provisions include: Utah Code (May 8, 2018), 
Title 19, ``Environmental Quality Code,'' Chapter 6, ``Hazardous 
Substances,'' Part 4 ``Underground Storage Tank Act'': Sections 19-6-
402 (14); 19-6-404(2)(f), (j), and (m); 19-6-407(2); 19-6-414; 19-6-
416; 19-6-418; 19-6-420(2), (4)(a), (5)(b), (8), and (9)(b); 19-6-
424.5; 19-6-425; 19-6-426(5) and (6); 19-6-427, and 19-5-429(1).
    (B) The regulatory provisions include:
    (1) Utah Administrative Code (January 1, 2017), Title 311: 
``Environmental Quality, Environmental Response and Remediation'': 
Sections R311-206-7(a) and (f); R311-208-1 through R311-208-5.
    (2) Utah Administrative Code (January 1, 2017), Title 305: 
``Environmental Quality, Administrative Procedures'': Sections R305-7-
101 through R305-7-113; R305-7-200 through R305-7-217; R305-7-301 
through R305-7-320; R305-7-401 through R305-7-403; R305-7-501 through 
R305-7-503; and R305-7-601 through R305-7-623.
    (iii) Provisions not incorporated by reference. The following 
specifically identified sections and rules applicable to the Utah 
underground storage tank program that are broader in coverage than the 
federal program, are not part of the approved program, and are not 
incorporated by reference herein for enforcement purposes:
    (A) Utah Code (May 8, 2018), Title 19: ``Environmental Quality 
Code,'' Chapter 6, ``Hazardous Substances,'' Part 4 ``Underground 
Storage Tank Act'': Sections 19-6-412(6); and 19-6-411(7).
    (B) Utah Administrative Code (January 1, 2017), Title 311: 
``Environmental Quality, Environmental Response and Remediation'': 
Sections R311-201-2; R311-201-4; R311-201-5 through 10; R311-203-3(b), 
(c) and (g); R311-203-4; R311-206-2(a)(1), (b) and (c); and R311-206-
8(a)(1)--(4) and (f)(1)(A).
    (2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General's 
Statements, signed by the Assistant Attorney General and Director of 
the Environment and Health Division of the Utah Attorney General's 
Office of the State of Utah on October 2, 2017, though not incorporated 
by reference, are referenced as part of the approved underground 
storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
    (3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The 
``Demonstration of Procedures for Adequate Enforcement'' submitted as 
part of the original application on February 28, 2018, though not 
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved 
underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 
6991 et seq.
    (4) Program description. The program description and any other 
material submitted as part of the original application on February 28, 
2018, though not incorporated by reference, are referenced as part of 
the approved underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 
42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
    (5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between 
EPA Region 8 and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, signed 
by the EPA Acting Regional Administrator on July 27, 2017, though not 
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved 
underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 
6991 et seq.

0
3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended by revising the entry for Utah to 
read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 282--State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in 
Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations

* * * * *

Utah

    (a) The statutory provisions include: Utah Code, Title 19: 
``Environmental Quality Code,'' Chapter 1, ``General Provisions, 
Part 2, Powers,'' (May 8, 1991) and Chapter 6, ``Hazardous 
Substances, Part 4, Underground Storage Tank Act'' (May 8, 2018):
    Section 19-1-203, Representatives of department authorized to 
enter regulated premises.
    Section 19-6-402, Definitions, except (3), (4), (8), (9), (11), 
(14), (15), (20), (23) and (26).
    Section 19-6-402.5, Retroactive effect.
    Section 19-6-403, Powers and duties of board, except (1)(a)(i), 
(1)(a)(vi) and (1)(a)(vii).
    Section 19-6-404, Powers and duties of director, except 2(c), 
2(f), 2(j) and 2(m).
    Section 19-6-407, Underground storage tank registration--Change 
of ownership or operation--civil penalty, except (2) and (3).
    Section 19-6-413, Tank tightness test--Action required after 
testing.
    Section 19-6-420 Abatement actions--Corrective actions, except 
(1) through (3)(b), (4)(a), (5)(b) and (c), (6), and 9(b).
    (b) Administrative Rules of the State of Utah, Title 311 
Environmental Quality, Environmental Response and Remediation, Utah 
Administrative Code (April 1, 2018):
    (1) Section R311-200-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Definitions, 
except (b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(10), (b)(11), (b)(12), 
(b)(13), (b)(20), (b)(22), (b)(28), (b)(34), (b)(38), (b)(44), 
(b)(45), (b)(49), (b)(51), (b)(55), (b)(56), (b)(58), and (b)(59).
    Section R311-201-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Definitions, 
except those definitions listed as excepted under R311-200-1.
    Section R311-201-12, Underground Storage Tanks: Certification 
Programs and UST Operator Training, UST Operator Training and 
Registration, except (d)(2) and (f).
    Section R311-202-1, Federal Underground Storage Tank 
Regulations, Incorporation by reference, except (a), (b), (c), and 
(d).
    Section R311-203-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Technical 
Standards, Definitions, except those definitions listed as excepted 
under R311-200-1.
    Section R311-203-2, Notification.
    Section R311-203-3, New installations, permits, except (b), (c), 
and (g).
    Section R311-203-5, UST testing requirements.
    Section R311-203-6, Secondary containment and under-dispenser 
containment.
    Section R311-203-7, Operator inspections.
    Section R311-203-8, Unattended facilities.
    Section R311-204-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Closure and 
Remediation, Definitions, except those definitions listed as 
excepted under R311-200-1.

[[Page 55292]]

    Section R311-204-2, Underground Storage Tank Closure Plan.
    Section R311-204-3, Disposal.
    Section R311-204-4, Closure notice.
    Section R311-205-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Site Assessment 
Protocol, Definitions, except those definitions listed as excepted 
under R311-200-1.
    Section R311-205-2, Site assessment protocol.
    Section R311-206-1, Underground Storage Tanks: Certificate of 
Compliance and Financial Assurance Mechanisms, Definitions, except 
those definitions listed as excepted under R311-200-1.
    Section R311-206-2, Declaration of financial assurance 
mechanisms, except (a)(1), (b), and (c).
    Section R311-206-3, Requirements for issuance of certificates of 
compliance, except (7) and (8).
    Section R311-206-5, Requirements for owners and operators 
demonstrating financial assurance by other methods, except (b) and 
(b)(2).
    Section R311-206-8, Delivery prohibition, except (a)(1)--(4) and 
(f)(1)(A).
    (c) Copies of the Utah regulations that are incorporated by 
reference are available from the Utah's Office of Administrative 
Rules, Office Coordinator, P.O. Box 141007, Salt Lake City, UT 
84114-1007; Phone number: 801-538-3003; website: https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-adm-code/.

[FR Doc. 2018-24062 Filed 11-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



     55286            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

     Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as                           2. Email: langenfeld.matthew@                      these documents should make an
     appropriate.                                            epa.gov.                                              appointment with the office at least 2
       Dated: October 30, 2018.                                 3. Mail: Matthew Langenfeld, Region                days in advance.
                                                             8, Project Officer, UST, Solid Waste and              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
     S.A. Stoermer,
                                                             PCB Unit, Resource Conservation and                   Matthew Langenfeld, (303) 312–6284,
     Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the               Recovery Program, Office of
     Port Sector Upper Mississippi River.                                                                          Langenfeld.matthew@epa.gov. To
                                                             Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance                inspect the hard copy materials, please
     [FR Doc. 2018–24120 Filed 11–2–18; 8:45 am]
                                                             (8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop                    schedule an appointment with Matthew
     BILLING CODE 9110–04–P                                  Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129.                  Langenfeld at (303) 312–6284.
                                                                4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                             your comments to Matthew Langenfeld,
     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid                 I. Approval of Revisions to Utah’s
     AGENCY                                                  Waste and PCB Unit, Resource                          Underground Storage Tank Program
                                                             Conservation and Recovery Program,                    A. Why are revisions to state programs
     40 CFR Part 282                                         Office of Partnerships and Regulatory                 necessary?
                                                             Assistance (8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595
     [EPA–R08–UST–2018–0169; FRL–9982–18–                    Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado                         States which have received final
     Region 8]                                               80202–1129.                                           approval from the EPA under RCRA
                                                                Instructions: Direct your comments to              section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
     Utah: Final Approval of State                           Docket ID No. EPA–R08–UST–2018–                       6991c(b), must maintain an
     Underground Storage Tank Program                        0169. EPA’s policy is that all comments               underground storage tank program that
     Revisions, Codification and                             received will be included in the public               is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
     Incorporation by Reference                              docket without change and may be                      less stringent than the federal
                                                             available online at http://                           underground storage tank program.
     AGENCY: Environmental Protection
                                                             www.regulations.gov, including any                    When the EPA makes revisions to the
     Agency (EPA).
                                                             personal information provided, unless                 regulations that govern the UST
     ACTION: Direct final rule.                                                                                    program, states must revise their
                                                             the comment includes information
     SUMMARY:   Pursuant to the Resource                     claimed to be Confidential Business                   programs to comply with the updated
     Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA                     Information (CBI) or other information                regulations and submit these revisions
     or Act), the Environmental Protection                   whose disclosure is restricted by statute.            to the EPA for approval. Most
     Agency (EPA) is taking direct final                     Do not submit information that you                    commonly, states must change their
     action to approve revisions to the State                consider to be CBI or otherwise                       programs because of changes to the
     of Utah’s Underground Storage Tank                      protected through http://                             EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
     (UST) program submitted by the State.                   www.regulations.gov, or email. The                    Regulations (CFR) part 280. States can
     The EPA has determined that these                       federal http://www.regulations.gov                    also initiate changes on their own to
     revisions satisfy all requirements                      website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’                    their underground storage tank program
     needed for program approval. This                       system, which means the EPA will not                  and these changes must then be
     action also codifies the EPA’s approval                 know your identity or contact                         approved by the EPA.
     of Utah’s state program and incorporates                information unless you provide it in the
                                                                                                                   B. What decisions has the EPA made in
     by reference those provisions of the                    body of your comment. If you send an
                                                                                                                   this rule?
     State’s regulations that we have                        email comment directly to the EPA
                                                             without going through http://                            On February 28, 2018, in accordance
     determined meet the requirements for                                                                          with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Utah submitted
     approval. The State’s federally-                        www.regulations.gov, your email
                                                             address will be automatically captured                a complete program revision application
     authorized and codified UST program,                                                                          seeking the EPA approval for its UST
     as revised pursuant to this action, will                and included as part of the comment
                                                             that is placed in the public docket and               program revisions (State Application).
     remain subject to the EPA’s inspection                                                                        Utah’s revisions correspond to the EPA
                                                             made available on the internet. If you
     and enforcement authorities under                                                                             final rule published on July 15, 2015 (80
                                                             submit an electronic comment, the EPA
     sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA subtitle                                                                       FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST
                                                             recommends that you include your
     I and other applicable statutory and                                                                          regulations and the 1988 state program
                                                             name and other contact information in
     regulatory provisions.                                                                                        approval (SPA) regulations (2015
                                                             the body of your comment and with any
     DATES: This rule is effective January 4,                disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA                 Federal Revisions). As required by 40
     2019, unless the EPA receives adverse                   cannot read your comment due to                       CFR 281.20, the State Application
     comment by December 5, 2018. If EPA                     technical difficulties, and cannot                    contains the following: A transmittal
     receives adverse comment, it will                       contact you for clarification, the EPA                letter from the Governor requesting
     publish a timely withdrawal in the                      may not be able to consider your                      approval, a description of the program
     Federal Register informing the public                   comment. Electronic files should avoid                and operating procedures, a
     that the rule will not take effect. The                 the use of special characters, any form               demonstration of the State’s procedures
     incorporation by reference of certain                   of encryption, and be free of any defects             to ensure adequate enforcement, a
     publications listed in the regulations is               or viruses.                                           Memorandum of Agreement outlining
     approved by the Director of the Federal                    You can view and copy the                          the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
     Register, as of January 4, 2019, in                     documents that form the basis for this                and the implementing agency, a
     accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1                   action and associated publicly available              statement of certification from the
     CFR part 51.                                            materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                 Attorney General, and copies of all
     ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by                      Monday through Friday at the following                relevant state statutes and regulations.
     one of the following methods:                           location: EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop                  We have reviewed the State Application
        1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://               Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,                  and determined that the revisions to
     www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                  phone number (303) 312–6284.                          Utah’s UST program are equivalent to,
     instructions for submitting comments.                   Interested persons wanting to examine                 consistent with, and no less stringent


VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00040   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1


                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                        55287

     than the corresponding federal                          program under subtitle I of RCRA, and                 prohibition tag may be placed on a tank
     requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR                     therefore are subject to the EPA’s                    for failure to have a certificate of
     part 281, and that the Utah program                     inspection and enforcement authorities                compliance, spill and overfill
     provides for adequate enforcement of                    under RCRA sections 9005 and 9006, 42                 prevention, and required tank and/or
     compliance (40 CFR 281.11(b)).                          U.S.C. 6991d and 6991e, and other                     piping leak detection or corrosion
     Therefore, the EPA grants Utah final                    applicable statutory and regulatory                   protection.
     approval to operate its UST program                     provisions.                                              Specific authorities to regulate the
     with the changes described in the                                                                             installation, operation, maintenance,
                                                             G. What changes are we approving with                 and closure of USTs, as well as UST
     program revision application, and as                    this action and what standards do we
     outlined below in Section I.G of this                                                                         releases are found under Utah
                                                             use for review?                                       Administrative Code (UAC), as
     document.
                                                                In order to be approved, each state                amended effective January 1, 2017,
     C. What is the effect of this action on the             program application must meet the                     R311–200 through R311–212,
     regulated community?                                    general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11,                Underground Storage Tanks; Reporting
       This action does not impose                           and specific requirements in 40 CFR                   and recordkeeping requirements are
     additional requirements on the                          Subpart B (Components of a Program                    found under UAC R311–202–280.34;
     regulated community because the                         Application); Subpart C (Criteria for No              Environmental Quality Administrative
     regulations being approved by this rule                 Less Stringent); and Subpart D                        Rules are found under UAC, as
     are already in effect in the State of Utah,             (Adequate Enforcement of Compliance).                 amended February 1, 2018, R305–1
     and are not changed by this action. This                This also is true for proposed revisions              through R305–9; and maintenance and
     action merely approves the existing                     to approved state programs.                           management of records for individual
     state regulations as meeting the federal                   As more fully described below, the                 sites and projects is required under Utah
     requirements and renders them                           State has made the changes to its                     Statutes (2008), Title 63G, Chapter 2,
     federally enforceable.                                  approved UST program to reflect the                   Part 1 through Part 9. The
                                                             2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA is                    aforementioned statutory sections and
     D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?                approving the State’s changes because                 regulations satisfy the requirements of
       The EPA is publishing this direct final               they are equivalent to, consistent with,              40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
     rule without a prior proposed rule                      and no less stringent than the federal                   Through a Memorandum of
     because we view this as a                               UST program and because the EPA has                   Agreement between the State of Utah
     noncontroversial action and we                          confirmed that the Utah UST program                   and the EPA, effective June 27, 2017, the
     anticipate no adverse comment. Utah                     will continue to provide for adequate                 State maintains procedures for receiving
     did not receive any comments during its                 enforcement of compliance as described                and ensuring proper consideration of
     comment period when the rules and                       in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part 281,                     information about violations submitted
     regulations being considered today were                 Subpart D after this approval.                        by the public. The State agrees to
     proposed at the state level.                               The Utah Department of                             comply with public participation
                                                             Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division                 provisions contained in 40 CFR 281.42
     E. What happens if the EPA receives                     of Environmental Response and                         including the provision that the State
     comments that oppose this action?                       Remediation (DERR) is the lead                        will not oppose intervention under Rule
        Along with this direct final rule, the               implementing agency for the UST                       24(a)(2) of the Utah Rules of Civil
     EPA is publishing a separate document                   program in Utah, except in Indian                     Procedure on the grounds that the
     in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this               country.                                              applicant’s interest is adequately
     Federal Register that serves as the                        The DERR continues to have broad                   represented by the State. Utah has met
     proposal to approve the State’s UST                     statutory authority to regulate the                   the public participation requirements
     program revisions, and provides an                      installation, operation, maintenance,                 found in 40 CFR 281.42.
     opportunity for public comment. If EPA                  and closure of USTs, as well as UST                      To qualify for final approval,
     receives comments that oppose this                      releases under Utah Statutes (2018),                  revisions to a state’s program must be
     approval, the EPA will withdraw this                    Title 19, Chapter 6, Part 4—                          ‘‘equivalent to, consistent with, and no
     direct final rule by publishing a                       Underground Storage Tank Act,                         less stringent’’ than the 2015 Federal
     document in the Federal Register before                 Sections 401–429. The Utah UST                        Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions
     it becomes effective. The EPA will base                 Program gets its enforcement authority                the EPA addressed UST systems
     any further decision on approval of the                 from the powers and duties of the DERR                deferred in the 1988 UST regulations,
     State Application after considering all                 Director (Director) found in Title 19,                and added, among other things, new
     comments received during the comment                    Chapter 6, Part 4, Sections 404(f), 404(j)            operation and maintenance
     period. The EPA will then address all                   and 425(2). Under Title 19, Chapter 6,                requirements; secondary containment
     public comments in a later final rule.                  Part 4, Section 404(k) the Director is                requirements for new and replaced
     You may not have another opportunity                    authorized to require an owner to                     tanks and piping; operator training
     to comment. If you want to comment on                   furnish records, conduct monitoring or                requirements; and a requirement to
     this approval, you must do so at this                   testing, and provide access to tanks. The             ensure UST system compatibility before
     time.                                                   Director is authorized to issue a Notice              storing certain biofuel blends. In
                                                             of Intent to Revoke and Order to Revoke               addition, the EPA removed past
     F. For what has Utah previously been                    Certificates of Compliance under Title                deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
     approved?                                               19, Chapter 6, Part 4, Section 414.                   field constructed tanks, and airport
        On April 7, 1995, the EPA finalized a                Certificates of Compliance lapse                      hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes
     rule approving the UST program that                     automatically if annual registration fees             revisions to approved state programs
     Utah proposed to administer in lieu of                  are not paid under Title 19, Chapter 6,               pursuant to the criteria found in 40 CFR
     the federal UST program. On December                    Part 4, Section 408(5)(c). Penalties for              281.30 through 281.39.
     5, 1995, the EPA codified the provisions                non-compliance with Utah’s UST Act                       The DERR has revised its regulations
     of the approved Utah program that are                   may be assessed under Title 19, Chapter               to help ensure that the State’s UST
     part of the underground storage tank                    6, Part 4, Section 425(1). A delivery                 program revisions are equivalent to,


VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00041   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1


     55288            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

     consistent with, and no less stringent                  Environmental Assurance Program to                      Under Utah Administrative Code
     than the 2015 Federal Revisions. In                     demonstrate financial assurance.                      R311–201–12(f), Utah requires third-
     particular, the DERR has amended Utah                      Under Utah Statutes, Title 19, Chapter             party Class B operators to be certified as
     Administrative Code R311–202–1 to                       6, Part 4—Underground Storage Tank                    UST testers, installers, or meet the
     incorporate by reference (into the Utah                 Act, Section 412(6), certificates of                  requirements of certified UST
     regulations) the requirements of 40 CFR                 compliance are required to operate                    inspectors. Under Utah Administrative
     part 280, including the requirements                    regulated UST systems and are issued                  Code R311–203–5, Utah requires that
     added by the 2015 Federal Revisions,                    by the State for facilities that are                  UST testers report test results. Under
     except for 40 CFR Subpart J (Operator                   registered, have financial assurance,                 Utah Administrative Code R311–203–
     Training) and the definitions of Class A,               comply with federal and state rules, and              7(a), Utah requires that walkthrough
     B and C operators. (We note that R311–                  meet tank testing requirements. Under                 inspections conducted under 40 CFR
     206–2(a)(2) also incorporates by                        Utah Statutes, Title 19, Chapter 6, Part              280.36 be conducted by or under the
     reference the necessary requirements for                4—Underground Storage Tank Act,                       direction of a Class B Operator. Under
     financial responsibility for UST                        Section 411(7), the DERR Director shall               Utah Administrative Code R311–203–
     systems.) The State, therefore, has                     issue certificates of compliance and the              7(c), Utah requires UST facilites with
     ensured that the criteria found in 40                   Waste Management and Radiation                        temporarily closed tanks to conduct
     CFR 281.30 through 281.38 are met.                      Control Board shall make rules for                    annual operator inspections. Under
        Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the                    identifying USTs that do not qualify for              Utah Administrative Code R311–211–
     state operator training requirements that               a certificate of compliance.                          12(h)(2) and (3), Utah requires Class A
     must be met in order to be considered                      Under Utah Administrative Code                     and B operators to submit a registration
     equivalent to, consistent with, and no                  R311–201–2, Utah requires that UST                    application to the DERR Director,
     less stringent than federal requirements.               consultants, inspectors, testers,                     documenting proper training with its
     Utah did not incorporate by reference                   installers, removers, and groundwater                 renewal registration application prior to
     federal requirements for operator                       and soil samplers be certified by the                 expiration of their existing certification.
     training, and has promulgated and is                    State. Under Utah Administrative Code                 I. How does this action affect Indian
     implementing its own operator training                  R311–201–2, Utah allows individuals to                country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Utah?
     provisions under Utah Administrative                    apply for certification, and under Utah
     Code R311–201–12. After a thorough                      Administrative Code R311–201–4, Utah                     The EPA’s approval of Utah’s Program
     review, the EPA has determined that                     lists eligibility requirements for                    does not extend to Indian country as
     Utah’s operator training requirements                   certification of UST consultants,                     defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian
     are equivalent to, consistent with, and                 inspectors, testers, and installers. Under            country generally includes lands within
     no less stringent than federal                          Utah Administrative Code R311–203–3,                  the exterior boundaries of the following
     requirements.                                           Utah requires certified installers to pay             Indian reservations located within Utah:
        As part of the State Application the                 a permit fee for installation at facilities           The Washakie Reservation
     Utah Attorney General certified that the                that do not qualify for a certificate of              (Northwestern Band of the Shoshone
     State revisions meet the requirements                   compliance and to notify the DERR                     Nation), reservation lands of the Paiute
     ‘‘equivalent to, consistent with, and no                Director of the completion of                         Indian Tribe of Utah (Cedar Band of
     less stringent’’ criteria in 40 CFR 281.30              installation. Under Utah Administrative               Paiutes, Kanosh Band of Paiutes,
     through 281.39. The EPA is relying on                   Code R311–201–5 through 10, Utah                      Koosharem Band of Paiutes, Indian
     this certification in addition to the                   allows for renewal of certificates,                   Peaks Band of Paiutes, and Shivwits
     analysis submitted by the State in                      provides standards of performance,                    Band of Paiutes), the Skull Valley
     making our determination.                               gives the DERR Director the ability to                Indian Reservation, the Uintah & Ouray
        For further information on the EPA’s                 deny certification, and allows for                    Reservation, the Goshute Reservation,
     analysis of the State’s application, see                appeal, inactivation, revocation, and                 and the Navajo Nation; any land held in
     the chart in the Technical Support                      reciprocity.                                          trust by the United States for an Indian
     Document (TSD) contained in the                            Under Utah Administrative Code                     tribe; and any other areas that are
     docket for this rulemaking.                             R311–203–3, Utah requires installers to               ‘‘Indian country’’ within the meaning of
                                                             provide notification to the State 10 days             18 U.S.C. 1151. Any lands removed
     H. Where are the revised rules different
                                                             prior to installation of UST systems and              from an Indian reservation status by
     from the Federal rules?
                                                             components, and requires an UST                       federal court action are not considered
     Broader in Scope Provisions                             installation permit fee. Under Utah                   reservation lands even if located within
       Where an approved state program has                   Administrative Code R311–203–4, Utah                  the exterior boundaries of an Indian
     a greater scope of coverage than                        requires UST registration fees.                       reservation. The EPA will retain
     required by federal law, the additional                                                                       responsibilities under RCRA for
                                                             More Stringent Provisions                             underground storage tanks in Indian
     coverage is not part of the federally-
     approved program and are not federally                    Where an approved state program                     country. Therefore, this action has no
     enforceable. (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii))                  includes requirements that are                        effect in Indian country. See 40 CFR
     The following statutory and regulatory                  considered more stringent than required               281.12(a)(2).
     requirements are considered broader in                  by federal law, the more stringent                    II. Codification
     coverage than the federal program as                    requirements become part of the
     these state-only regulations are not                    federally approved program. (40 CFR                   A. What is codification?
     required by federal regulation and are                  281.12(a)(3)(ii))                                        Codification is the process of placing
     implemented by the State in addition to                   The following statutory and                         a state’s statutes and regulations that
     the federally approved program:                         regulatory requirements are considered                comprise the state’s approved UST
       Utah Administrative Code R311–206–                    more stringent than the federal program,              program into the CFR. Section 9004(b)
     2(a)(1) and (b) allows owners and                       and on approval, they become part of                  of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA
     operators, meeting requirements for                     the federally approved program and are                to approve State UST programs to
     participation, to use the State-only                    federally enforceable:                                operate in lieu of the federal program.


VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1


                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                        55289

     The EPA codifies its authorization of                   enforcement purposes the State’s                      by State law. It complies with
     state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and                   regulations. Section 282.94 also                      applicable EOs and statutory provisions
     incorporates by reference state                         references the Attorney General’s                     as follows:
     regulations that the EPA will enforce                   Statement, Demonstration of Adequate
                                                                                                                   A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory
     under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA                    Enforcement Procedures, the Program
                                                                                                                   Planning and Review, Executive Order
     and any other applicable statutory                      Description, and the Memorandum of
                                                                                                                   13563: Improving Regulation and
     provisions. The incorporation by                        Agreement, which are approved as part
                                                                                                                   Regulatory Review
     reference of state authorized programs                  of the UST program under subtitle I of
     in the CFR should substantially enhance                 RCRA.                                                   The Office of Management and Budget
     the public’s ability to discern the                                                                           (OMB) has exempted this action from
                                                             D. What is the effect of EPA’s                        the requirements of Executive Order
     current status of the approved state
                                                             codification of the federally authorized              12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and
     program and state requirements that can
                                                             State UST Program on enforcement?                     13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This
     be federally enforced. This effort
     provides clear notice to the public of the                 The EPA retains the authority under                action approves and codifies state
     scope of the approved program in each                   sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006 of                    requirements for the purpose of RCRA
     state.                                                  subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),               section 9004 and imposes no additional
                                                             6991d and 6991e, and other applicable                 requirements beyond those imposed by
     B. What is the history of codification of               statutory and regulatory provisions to                state law. Therefore, this action is not
     Utah’s UST program?                                     undertake corrective action, inspections,             subject to review by OMB.
       The EPA incorporated by reference                     and enforcement actions, and to issue
     and codified Utah’s then-approved UST                   orders in approved States. If the EPA                 B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
     program in 40 CFR 282.94, effective                     determines it will take such actions in               Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
     April 7, 1995 (60 FR 12709; March 8,                    Utah, the EPA will rely on federal                    Costs
     1995). Through this action, the EPA is                  sanctions, federal inspection authorities,              This action is not an Executive Order
     incorporating by reference and                          and other federal procedures rather than              13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
     codifying Utah’s state program in 40                    the state analogs. Therefore, though the              regulatory action because actions such
     CFR 282.94 to include the approved                      EPA has approved the State procedures                 as this final approval of Utah’s revised
     revisions.                                              listed in 40 CFR 282.94(d)(1)(ii), the                underground storage tank program
     C. What codification decisions have we                  EPA is not incorporating by reference                 under RCRA are exempted under
     made in this rule?                                      Utah’s procedural and enforcement                     Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I
                                                             authorities.                                          certify that this action will not have a
        In this rule, we are finalizing the                                                                        significant economic impact on a
     federal regulatory text that incorporates               E. What State provisions are not part of
                                                                                                                   substantial number of small entities
     by reference the federally authorized                   the codification?
                                                                                                                   under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
     Utah UST Program. In accordance with                       The public also needs to be aware that             U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
     the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are                  some provisions of the State’s UST
     finalizing the incorporation by reference               program are not part of the federally                 C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and
     of the Utah rules described in the                      approved State program. Such                          Executive Order 13175: Consultation
     amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set                       provisions are not part of the RCRA                   and Coordination With Indian Tribal
     forth below. The EPA has made, and                      Subtitle I program because they are                   Governments
     will continue to make, these documents                  ‘‘broader in coverage’’ than Subtitle I of              Because this action approves and
     generally available through                             RCRA. Title 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)                   codifies pre-existing requirements under
     www.regulations.gov and at the EPA                      states that where an approved state                   state law and does not impose any
     Region 8 office (see the ADDRESSES                      program has provisions that are broader               additional enforceable duty beyond that
     section of this preamble for more                       in coverage than the federal program,                 required by state law, it does not
     information).                                           those provisions are not a part of the                contain any unfunded mandate or
        One purpose of this Federal Register                 federally approved program. As a result,              significantly or uniquely affect small
     document is to codify Utah’s approved                   State provisions which are ‘‘broader in               governments, as described in the
     UST program. The codification reflects                  coverage’’ than the federal program are               Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
     the State program that would be in                      not incorporated by reference for                     (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538). For the same
     effect at the time the EPA’s approved                   purposes of enforcement in part 282.                  reason, this action also does not
     revisions to the Utah UST program                       Title 40 CFR 282.94(d)(1)(iii) lists for              significantly or uniquely affect the
     addressed in this direct final rule                     reference and clarity the Utah statutory              communities of tribal governments, as
     become final. If, however, the EPA                      and regulatory provisions which are                   specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
     receives substantive comment on the                     ‘‘broader in coverage’’ than the federal              FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
     proposed rule then this codification will               program and which are not, therefore,
     not take effect, and the State rules that                                                                     D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
                                                             part of the approved program being
     are approved after the EPA considers                    codified today. Provisions that are                     This action will not have substantial
     public comment will be codified                         ‘‘broader in coverage’’ cannot be                     direct effects on the states, on the
     instead. By codifying the approved Utah                 enforced by EPA; the State, however,                  relationship between the national
     program and by amending the Code of                     will continue to implement and enforce                government and the states, or on the
     Federal Regulations (CFR), the public                   such provisions under State law.                      distribution of power and
     will more easily be able to discern the                                                                       responsibilities among the various
     status of the federally-approved                        III. Statutory and Executive Order                    levels of government, as specified in
     requirements of the Utah program.                       (E.O.) Reviews                                        Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
        The EPA is incorporating by reference                   This action only applies to Utah’s                 Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely
     the Utah approved UST program in 40                     UST Program requirements pursuant to                  approves and codifies state
     CFR 282.94. Section 282.94(d)(1)(ii)(B)                 RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no                      requirements as part of the State RCRA
     incorporates by reference for                           requirements other than those imposed                 Underground Storage Tank Program


VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00043   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1


     55290            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

     without altering the relationship or the                Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).                   Dated: October 26, 2018.
     distribution of power and                               ‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).             Douglas Benevento,
     responsibilities established by RCRA.                                                                         Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
                                                             K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
     E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of                 Actions To Address Environmental                        For the reasons set forth in the
     Children From Environmental Health                      Justice in Minority Populations and Low               preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part
     and Safety Risks                                        Income Populations                                    282 as follows:
       This action also is not subject to
                                                                Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,                 PART 282—APPROVED
     Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
                                                             Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal                    UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
     Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not
     economically significant and it does not                executive policy on environmental                     PROGRAMS
     make decisions based on environmental                   justice. Its main provision directs
                                                             federal agencies, to the greatest extent              ■ 1. The authority citation for part 282
     health or safety risks.                                                                                       continues to read as follows:
                                                             practicable and permitted by law, to
     F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That                  make environmental justice part of their                Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d,
     Significantly Affect Energy Supply,                     mission by identifying and addressing,                and 6991e.
     Distribution, or Use                                    as appropriate, disproportionately high               ■   2. Revise § 282.94 to read as follows:
       This rule is not subject to Executive                 and adverse human health or
                                                             environmental effects of their programs,              § 282.94 Utah State-Administered
     Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,                                                                             Program.
     2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant                 policies, and activities on minority
     regulatory action’’ as defined under                    populations and low-income                               (a) History of the approval of Utah’s
     Executive Order 12866.                                  populations in the United States.                     Program. The State of Utah is approved
                                                             Because this rule approves pre-existing               to administer and enforce an
     G. National Technology Transfer and                                                                           underground storage tank program in
                                                             state rules which are at least equivalent
     Advancement Act                                                                                               lieu of the federal program under
                                                             to, consistent with, and no less stringent
       Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA                   than existing federal requirements, and               subtitle I of the Resource Conservation
     grants a state’s application for approval               imposes no additional requirements                    and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as
     as long as the state meets the criteria                 beyond those imposed by state law, and                amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The
     required by RCRA. It would thus be                      there are no anticipated significant                  State’s program, as administered by the
     inconsistent with applicable law for the                                                                      Utah Department of Environmental
                                                             adverse human health or environmental
     EPA, when it reviews a state approval                                                                         Quality (DEQ), Division of
                                                             effects, the rule is not subject to
     application, to require the use of any                                                                        Environmental Response and
                                                             Executive Order 12898.
     particular voluntary consensus standard                                                                       Remediation (DERR), was approved by
     in place of another standard that                       L. Congressional Review Act                           EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and
     otherwise satisfies the requirements of                                                                       Part 281 of this Chapter. EPA published
                                                                The Congressional Review Act, 5                    the notice of final determination
     RCRA. Thus, the requirements of
     section 12(d) of the National                           U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that               approving the Utah underground storage
     Technology Transfer and Advancement                     before a rule may take effect, the agency             tank base program effective on April 7,
     Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not                 promulgating the rule must submit a                   1995. A subsequent program revision
     apply.                                                  rule report, which includes a copy of                 application was approved by EPA and
                                                             the rule, to each House of the Congress               became effective on January 4, 2019.
     H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice                 and to the Comptroller General of the                    (b) Enforcement authority. Utah has
     Reform                                                  United States. The EPA will submit a                  primary responsibility for administering
       As required by section 3 of Executive                 report containing this document and                   and enforcing its federally approved
     Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7,                    other required information to the U.S.                underground storage tank program.
     1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has                Senate, the U.S. House of                             However, EPA retains the authority to
     taken the necessary steps to eliminate                  Representatives, and the Comptroller                  exercise its corrective action,
     drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize                 General of the United States prior to                 inspection, and enforcement authorities
     potential litigation, and provide a clear               publication in the Federal Register. A                under sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006
     legal standard for affected conduct.                    major rule cannot take effect until 60                of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
                                                             days after it is published in the Federal             6991b(h),6991d and 6991e, as well as
     I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental                                                                        under any other applicable statutory
                                                             Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
     Actions and Interference With                                                                                 and regulatory provisions.
                                                             rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
     Constitutionally Protected Property                                                                              (c) To retain program approval, Utah
                                                             However, this action will be effective
     Rights                                                                                                        must revise its approved program to
                                                             January 4, 2019 because it is a direct
        The EPA has complied with Executive                  final rule.                                           adopt new changes to the federal
     Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar. 15, 1988)                                                                       subtitle I program which make it more
                                                               Authority: This rule is issued under the            stringent, in accordance with section
     by examining the takings implications
                                                             authority of Sections 2002(a), 7004(b), and           9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, and 40
     of the rule in accordance with the
                                                             9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste                CFR part 281, subpart E. If Utah obtains
     ‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
                                                             Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a),          approval for the revised requirements
     Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
                                                             6974(b), and 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.                 pursuant to section 9004 of RCRA, 42
     and Avoidance of Unanticipated
     Takings’’ issued under the executive                    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282                   U.S.C. 6991c, the newly approved
     order.                                                                                                        statutory and regulatory provisions will
                                                               Environmental protection,                           be added to this subpart and notice of
     J. Paperwork Reduction Act                              Administrative practice and procedure,                any change will be published in the
       This rule does not impose an                          Hazardous substances, Incorporation by                Federal Register.
     information collection burden under the                 reference, State program approval, and                   (d) Utah has final approval for the
     provisions of the Paperwork Reduction                   Underground storage tanks.                            following elements of its program


VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00044   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1


                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                  55291

     application originally submitted to EPA                 through R305–7–113; R305–7–200                        ■ 3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended
     and approved effective April 7, 1995,                   through R305–7–217; R305–7–301                        by revising the entry for Utah to read as
     and the program revision application                    through R305–7–320; R305–7–401                        follows:
     approved by EPA effective on January 4,                 through R305–7–403; R305–7–501
                                                                                                                   Appendix A to Part 282—State
     2019:                                                   through R305–7–503; and R305–7–601
        (1) State statutes and regulations—(i)                                                                     Requirements Incorporated by
                                                             through R305–7–623.
     Incorporation by reference. The Utah                       (iii) Provisions not incorporated by               Reference in Part 282 of the Code of
     provisions cited in this paragraph, and                 reference. The following specifically                 Federal Regulations
     listed in Appendix A to part 282, are                   identified sections and rules applicable              *        *       *    *     *
     incorporated by reference as part of the                to the Utah underground storage tank
     underground storage tank program                        program that are broader in coverage                  Utah
     under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991                than the federal program, are not part of                (a) The statutory provisions include: Utah
     et seq. The Director of the Federal                     the approved program, and are not                     Code, Title 19: ‘‘Environmental Quality
     Register approves this incorporation by                 incorporated by reference herein for                  Code,’’ Chapter 1, ‘‘General Provisions, Part
                                                                                                                   2, Powers,’’ (May 8, 1991) and Chapter 6,
     reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.                   enforcement purposes:                                 ‘‘Hazardous Substances, Part 4, Underground
     552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may                          (A) Utah Code (May 8, 2018), Title 19:             Storage Tank Act’’ (May 8, 2018):
     obtain copies of the Utah regulations                   ‘‘Environmental Quality Code,’’ Chapter                  Section 19–1–203, Representatives of
     that are incorporated by reference in                   6, ‘‘Hazardous Substances,’’ Part 4                   department authorized to enter regulated
     this paragraph from Utah’s Office of                    ‘‘Underground Storage Tank Act’’:                     premises.
     Administrative Rules, Office                            Sections 19–6–412(6); and 19–6–411(7).                   Section 19–6–402, Definitions, except (3),
     Coordinator, P.O. Box 141007, Salt Lake                    (B) Utah Administrative Code                       (4), (8), (9), (11), (14), (15), (20), (23) and (26).
     City, UT 84114–1007; Phone number:                      (January 1, 2017), Title 311:                            Section 19–6–402.5, Retroactive effect.
                                                             ‘‘Environmental Quality, Environmental                   Section 19–6–403, Powers and duties of
     801–538–3003; website: https://
                                                             Response and Remediation’’: Sections                  board, except (1)(a)(i), (1)(a)(vi) and
     rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-adm-                                                                         (1)(a)(vii).
     code/. You may inspect all approved                     R311–201–2; R311–201–4; R311–201–5
                                                                                                                      Section 19–6–404, Powers and duties of
     material at the EPA Region 8, 1595                      through 10; R311–203–3(b), (c) and (g);               director, except 2(c), 2(f), 2(j) and 2(m).
     Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado                        R311–203–4; R311–206–2(a)(1), (b) and                    Section 19–6–407, Underground storage
     80202 (Phone number (303) 312–6284 or                   (c); and R311–206–8(a)(1)—(4) and                     tank registration—Change of ownership or
     the National Archives and Records                       (f)(1)(A).                                            operation—civil penalty, except (2) and (3).
     Administration (NARA). For                                 (2) Statement of legal authority. The                 Section 19–6–413, Tank tightness test—
     information on the availability of the                  Attorney General’s Statements, signed                 Action required after testing.
                                                             by the Assistant Attorney General and                    Section 19–6–420 Abatement actions—
     material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or                                                                        Corrective actions, except (1) through (3)(b),
     go to http://www.archives.gov/federal-                  Director of the Environment and Health
                                                             Division of the Utah Attorney General’s               (4)(a), (5)(b) and (c), (6), and 9(b).
     register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.                                                                                 (b) Administrative Rules of the State of
        (A) Utah Statutory and Regulatory                    Office of the State of Utah on October
                                                                                                                   Utah, Title 311 Environmental Quality,
     Requirements Applicable to the                          2, 2017, though not incorporated by                   Environmental Response and Remediation,
     Underground Storage Tank Program,                       reference, are referenced as part of the              Utah Administrative Code (April 1, 2018):
     October 2018.                                           approved underground storage tank                        (1) Section R311–200–1, Underground
        (B) [Reserved]                                       program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42                  Storage Tanks: Definitions, except (b)(2),
        (ii) Legal basis. EPA evaluated the                  U.S.C. 6991 et seq.                                   (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(10), (b)(11), (b)(12),
     following statutes and regulations                         (3) Demonstration of procedures for                (b)(13), (b)(20), (b)(22), (b)(28), (b)(34),
     which provide the legal basis for the                   adequate enforcement. The                             (b)(38), (b)(44), (b)(45), (b)(49), (b)(51),
                                                             ‘‘Demonstration of Procedures for                     (b)(55), (b)(56), (b)(58), and (b)(59).
     State’s implementation of the
                                                             Adequate Enforcement’’ submitted as                      Section R311–201–1, Underground Storage
     underground storage tank program, but                                                                         Tanks: Definitions, except those definitions
     they are not being incorporated by                      part of the original application on                   listed as excepted under R311–200–1.
     reference and do not replace Federal                    February 28, 2018, though not                            Section R311–201–12, Underground
     authorities:                                            incorporated by reference, is referenced              Storage Tanks: Certification Programs and
        (A) The statutory provisions include:                as part of the approved underground                   UST Operator Training, UST Operator
     Utah Code (May 8, 2018), Title 19,                      storage tank program under subtitle I of              Training and Registration, except (d)(2) and
     ‘‘Environmental Quality Code,’’ Chapter                 RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.                          (f).
     6, ‘‘Hazardous Substances,’’ Part 4                        (4) Program description. The program                  Section R311–202–1, Federal Underground
     ‘‘Underground Storage Tank Act’’:                       description and any other material                    Storage Tank Regulations, Incorporation by
                                                             submitted as part of the original                     reference, except (a), (b), (c), and (d).
     Sections 19–6–402 (14); 19–6–404(2)(f),
                                                             application on February 28, 2018,                        Section R311–203–1, Underground Storage
     (j), and (m); 19–6–407(2); 19–6–414; 19–                                                                      Tanks: Technical Standards, Definitions,
     6–416; 19–6–418; 19–6–420(2), (4)(a),                   though not incorporated by reference,                 except those definitions listed as excepted
     (5)(b), (8), and (9)(b); 19–6–424.5; 19–6–              are referenced as part of the approved                under R311–200–1.
     425; 19–6–426(5) and (6); 19–6–427, and                 underground storage tank program                         Section R311–203–2, Notification.
     19–5–429(1).                                            under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.                      Section R311–203–3, New installations,
        (B) The regulatory provisions include:               6991 et seq.                                          permits, except (b), (c), and (g).
        (1) Utah Administrative Code                            (5) Memorandum of Agreement. The                      Section R311–203–5, UST testing
     (January 1, 2017), Title 311:                           Memorandum of Agreement between                       requirements.
     ‘‘Environmental Quality, Environmental                  EPA Region 8 and the Utah Department                     Section R311–203–6, Secondary
     Response and Remediation’’: Sections                    of Environmental Quality, signed by the               containment and under-dispenser
                                                             EPA Acting Regional Administrator on                  containment.
     R311–206–7(a) and (f); R311–208–1                                                                                Section R311–203–7, Operator inspections.
     through R311–208–5.                                     July 27, 2017, though not incorporated                   Section R311–203–8, Unattended facilities.
        (2) Utah Administrative Code                         by reference, is referenced as part of the               Section R311–204–1, Underground Storage
     (January 1, 2017), Title 305:                           approved underground storage tank                     Tanks: Closure and Remediation, Definitions,
     ‘‘Environmental Quality, Administrative                 program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42                  except those definitions listed as excepted
     Procedures’’: Sections R305–7–101                       U.S.C. 6991 et seq.                                   under R311–200–1.



VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00045   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM       05NOR1


     55292            Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

        Section R311–204–2, Underground Storage              DATES:  This rule is effective 12:01 a.m.,            such species were harvested or
     Tank Closure Plan.                                      local time, November 7, through                       possessed, i.e., in state or Federal waters
        Section R311–204–3, Disposal.                        December 31, 2018.                                    (50 CFR 622.193(y)(1) and
        Section R311–204–4, Closure notice.
        Section R311–205–1, Underground Storage              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      622.181(c)(2)).
     Tanks: Site Assessment Protocol, Definitions,           Mary Vara, NMFS Southeast Regional
                                                                                                                   Classification
     except those definitions listed as excepted             Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, email:
     under R311–200–1.                                       mary.vara@noaa.gov.                                      The Regional Administrator,
        Section R311–205–2, Site assessment                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        Southeast Region, NMFS, has
     protocol.                                               snapper-grouper fishery of the South                  determined this temporary rule is
        Section R311–206–1, Underground Storage
                                                             Atlantic includes red snapper and is                  necessary for the conservation and
     Tanks: Certificate of Compliance and
     Financial Assurance Mechanisms,                         managed under the Fishery                             management of red snapper and the
     Definitions, except those definitions listed as         Management Plan for the Snapper-                      South Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery
     excepted under R311–200–1.                              Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic                 and is consistent with the Magnuson-
        Section R311–206–2, Declaration of                   Region (FMP). The FMP was prepared                    Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
     financial assurance mechanisms, except                  by the South Atlantic Fishery
     (a)(1), (b), and (c).                                   Management Council and is                                This action is taken under 50 CFR
        Section R311–206–3, Requirements for                 implemented by NMFS under the                         622.193(y)(1) and is exempt from review
     issuance of certificates of compliance, except          authority of the Magnuson-Stevens                     under Executive Order 12866.
     (7) and (8).                                                                                                     These measures are exempt from the
                                                             Fishery Conservation and Management
        Section R311–206–5, Requirements for
     owners and operators demonstrating                      Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by                         procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility
     financial assurance by other methods, except            regulations at 50 CFR part 622.                       Act because the temporary rule is issued
     (b) and (b)(2).                                            The 2018 commercial ACL for red                    without opportunity for prior notice and
        Section R311–206–8, Delivery prohibition,            snapper in the South Atlantic is 124,815              comment.
     except (a)(1)—(4) and (f)(1)(A).                        lb (56,615 kg), round weight, as
                                                                                                                      This action responds to the best
        (c) Copies of the Utah regulations that are          specified in 50 CFR 622.193(y)(1).
     incorporated by reference are available from                                                                  scientific information available. The
                                                                Under 50 CFR 622.193(y)(1), NMFS is
     the Utah’s Office of Administrative Rules,                                                                    NOAA Assistant Administrator for
                                                             required to close the commercial sector
     Office Coordinator, P.O. Box 141007, Salt               for red snapper when the commercial                   Fisheries (AA), finds that the need to
     Lake City, UT 84114–1007; Phone number:
                                                             ACL is reached, or is projected to be                 immediately implement this action to
     801–538–3003; website: https://rules.utah.                                                                    close the commercial sector for red
     gov/publications/utah-adm-code/.                        reached, by filing a notification to that
                                                             effect with the Office of the Federal                 snapper constitutes good cause to waive
     [FR Doc. 2018–24062 Filed 11–2–18; 8:45 am]
                                                             Register. NMFS has determined that the                the requirements to provide prior notice
     BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                             commercial ACL for South Atlantic red                 and opportunity for public comment
                                                             snapper will be reached by November 7,                pursuant to the authority set forth in 5
                                                             2018. Accordingly, the commercial                     U.S.C. 553(b)(B), as such procedures are
     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  sector for South Atlantic red snapper is              unnecessary and contrary to the public
                                                             closed effective 12:01 a.m., local time,              interest. Such procedures are
     National Oceanic and Atmospheric                        November 7, 2018. For the 2019 fishing                unnecessary because the rule
     Administration                                          year, NMFS will announce the                          implementing FMP Amendment 43,
                                                             commercial season opening date in the                 which established the commercial
     50 CFR Part 622                                         Federal Register. Unless otherwise                    season and ACLs for red snapper, and
     [Docket No. 1710319998630–02]                           specified, the 2019 commercial season                 the accountability measures has already
                                                             will begin on the second Monday in July               been subject to notice and comment,
     RIN 0648–XG594                                          (50 CFR 622.183(b)(5)(i)). NMFS notes                 and all that remains is to notify the
     Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of                     that the red snapper recreational sector              public of the closure. Such procedures
     Mexico, and South Atlantic; 2018                        closed for the 2018 fishing year at 12:01             are contrary to the public interest
     Commercial Accountability Measure                       a.m., local time, August 20, 2018 (83 FR              because of the need to immediately
     and Closure for South Atlantic Red                      35428; July 26, 2018). Therefore, as of               implement this action to protect red
     Snapper                                                 the commercial closure effective date,                snapper since the capacity of the fishing
                                                             all harvest and possession red snapper                fleet allows for rapid harvest of the
     AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                      in the South Atlantic EEZ will be                     commercial ACL. Prior notice and
     Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                    prohibited.                                           opportunity for public comment would
     Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                         The operator of a vessel with a valid              require time and could potentially result
     Commerce.                                               commercial vessel permit for South                    in a harvest well in excess of the
     ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.                        Atlantic snapper-grouper having red                   established commercial ACL.
                                                             snapper onboard must have landed and
     SUMMARY:   NMFS implements                              bartered, traded, or sold such red                       For the aforementioned reasons, the
     accountability measures for commercial                  snapper prior to 12:01 a.m., local time,              AA also finds good cause to waive the
     red snapper in the exclusive economic                   November 7, 2018. On and after the                    30-day delay in the effectiveness of this
     zone (EEZ) of the South Atlantic. NMFS                  effective date of the closure notification,           action under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
     projects commercial landings for red                    all sale or purchase of red snapper is                  Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
     snapper will reach the commercial                       prohibited. This prohibition on the                     Dated: October 31, 2018.
     annual catch limit (ACL) for the 2018                   harvest, possession, sale/purchase apply
     fishing year. Therefore, NMFS is closing                in the South Atlantic on board a vessel               Karen H. Abrams,
     the commercial sector for red snapper in                for which a valid Federal commercial or               Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
     the South Atlantic EEZ on November 7,                   charter vessel/headboat permit for                    Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
     2018. This closure is necessary to                      South Atlantic snapper-grouper has                    [FR Doc. 2018–24182 Filed 11–1–18; 4:15 pm]
     protect the red snapper resource.                       been issued, without regard to where                  BILLING CODE 3510–22–P




VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:30 Nov 02, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00046   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM   05NOR1



Document Created: 2018-11-03 00:28:42
Document Modified: 2018-11-03 00:28:42
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionDirect final rule.
DatesThis rule is effective January 4, 2019, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by December 5, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register, as of January 4, 2019, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
ContactMatthew Langenfeld, (303) 312-6284, [email protected] To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Matthew Langenfeld at (303) 312-6284.
FR Citation83 FR 55286 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Hazardous Substances; Incorporation by Reference; State Program Approval and Underground Storage Tanks

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR