83 FR 56704 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 56704-56709 | |
| FR Document | 2018-24688 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 56704-56709] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-24688] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2018-0297; Product Identifier 2017-NM-181-AD; Amendment 39-19497; AD 2018-23-11] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus SAS Model A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, - 231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, - 212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by investigations that revealed that the cover seal of the brake dual distribution valve (BDDV) was damaged and did not ensure efficient sealing. This AD requires identifying the BDDV part number installed on the airplane, and modifying or replacing BDDVs having certain part numbers. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective December 19, 2018. [[Page 56705]] The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 19, 2018. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018- 0297. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018- 0297; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647- 5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS Model A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2018 (83 FR 16799). The NPRM was prompted by investigations that revealed that the cover seal of the BDDV was damaged and did not ensure efficient sealing. The NPRM proposed to require identifying the BDDV part number installed on the airplane, and modifying or replacing BDDVs having certain part numbers. We are issuing this AD to address water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss of braking system function after landing. These conditions could possibly result in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 2017-0119, dated July 11, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The MCAI states: In 1998, an operator experienced a dual loss of braking systems. Investigation results revealed that the cover seal of the BDDV was damaged and did not ensure the sealing efficiency. This condition, if not corrected, could lead to water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss of braking system function after landing, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and injury to occupants. To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued Alert Operator Telex (AOT) 32-19 and Service Bulletin (SB) A320-32-1199, providing instructions for repetitive functional tests. In addition, Airbus developed mod 28301 and published SB A320-32-1203 to provide modification instructions. Consequently, DGAC [Directorate General for Civil Aviation] France issued AD 2000-258-146 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2001-15- 10, Amendment 39-12344 (66 FR 39413, July 31, 2001) (``AD 2001-15- 10'')] to require repetitive functional tests as a temporary solution (valid for a period of 15 months) and modification of the BDDV with a new cover and installation of a draining tube with a cap, which was terminating action for the repetitive functional tests. For pre-mod 27833 and pre-SB A320-32-1200 aeroplanes, repetitive inspections per SB A320-32-1199 were required as interim action, prior to the terminating action modification per SB A320-32- 1203. After that [DGAC] AD was issued, following a new event, Airbus developed a new modification of the BDDV drain tube which leaves it open, ensuring continuous drainage of any ingested water, thereby preventing freezing of the brake system. Consequently, EASA issued AD 2014-0251 (later revised), partially retaining the requirements of DGAC France AD 2000-258-146, which was superseded, and requiring an additional modification of the BDDV drain tube and re-identification of the BDDV. Since EASA AD 2014-0251R1 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2016-06- 13, Amendment 39-18444 (81 FR 17365, March 29, 2016) (``AD 2016-06- 13'')] was issued, comments were received that indicated a need for correction and clarification. Consequently, this [EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA AD 2014-0251R1, which is superseded, and expands the list of BDDV Part Numbers (P/N) which must be removed from service and are no longer eligible for installation on an aeroplane [and includes replacing affected part numbers as an option]. This [EASA] AD also clarifies the intended requirements of EASA AD 2014-0251 and introduces editorial changes, not affecting the requirements. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018- 0297. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. Supportive Comments Air Line Pilots Association, International stated its support for the NPRM. In addition, United Airlines (UAL) stated it concurs with the expansion of the affected BDDV part numbers as identified in Figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed AD. Request To Withdraw the NPRM Delta Air lines (DAL) requested that we withdraw the NPRM. DAL stated that the NPRM does not address an unsafe condition and, therefore, it is unnecessary. DAL commented that airplanes included in paragraph (c) of the proposed AD are already required to comply with the actions required by AD 2001-15-10, depending on modification status. DAL also commented that the NPRM does not add any airplanes to the applicability of AD 2001-15-10 and 2016-06-13. DAL stated that tracking compliance with the redundant requirements of the proposed AD would place an undue burden on airlines. DAL stated that paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and (j)(2)(i) of the proposed AD give credit for actions accomplished using previously issued service information. DAL commented that FAA Letter ANM-116-16-491, dated September 27, 2016, gives operators the authority to accomplish paragraph (g) of AD 2016-06-13 as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC), and it is also a terminating action for the actions required by paragraphs (e) and (f) of AD 2001-15-10. DAL stated that the compliance times for AD 2001-15-10 and AD 2016-06-13 have passed, therefore, all airplanes must be in compliance. [[Page 56706]] We partially agree with the commenter's request. We agree that airplanes included in paragraph (c) of this AD are also required to comply with AD 2001-15-10 and AD 2016-06-13, and that this AD does not add any new Model airplanes related to those listed in AD 2001-15-10 and AD 2016-06-13. However, as stated in paragraph (i) of this AD, compliance with paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of AD 2001-15-10 (which terminates all requirements of AD 2001-15-10 for Model A318, A319 and A320 series airplanes) and all requirements of AD 2016-06-13. For clarification, we have modified paragraph (i)(1) of this AD to state that compliance with paragraph (g) of this AD terminates all requirements of AD 2001-15-10 for Model A319, A320 and A321 series airplanes. We agree that operators will be required to track certain ADs with expired compliance times, but we are in process of rescinding some of those ADs through future rulemaking. We agree that AMOC letter ANM-116-16-491 dated September 27, 2016, will still be applicable to AD 2016-06-13. We disagree with the commenter's request to withdraw this AD. We, along with EASA, have determined that water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss of braking system function after landing, could possibly result in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants, and therefore, does constitute an unsafe condition, and that additional mandatory actions in this AD are required to mitigate the risks associated with the unsafe condition. Further, even if the current U.S.-Registered fleet is in compliance with the requirements of this AD, the issuance of the rule is still necessary to ensure that any affected airplane imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future would be required to be in compliance as well. This AD expands the list of BDDV part numbers, which must be removed from service and are no longer eligible for installation on an airplane. Therefore, all U.S.-Registered airplanes might not be in compliance with the actions of this AD even when in full compliance with AD 2001-15-10 and AD 2016-06-13. However, if DAL concludes that it is in compliance with the requirements of this AD, then it may utilize the provision in paragraph (f) to demonstrate compliance. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Correct Certain Wording DAL observed that the word ``actions'' was inadvertently omitted from the first sentence in paragraph (g)(2) of the proposed AD after the word ``corrective.'' We agree and have added the missing word accordingly. Request To Revise Certain Wording for Clarification UAL requested that we revise the wording in certain paragraphs of the proposed AD for clarification. UAL suggested that paragraph (g)(3) of the proposed AD be reworded because the way it is currently written, it could be interpreted as ``a part number specified as new P/N in figure 2 to paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(2)'' cannot be installed. UAL also suggested that paragraph (h) of the proposed AD be revised to eliminate paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) and be reworded to simply prohibit the installation of affected BDDVs as specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed AD. We partially agree to the commenter's requests. We agree to clarify paragraph (g)(3) of this AD. We have revised paragraph (g)(3) of this AD to clarify that operators should replace the old part number with a new part number as specified in figure 2 to paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(2) of this AD. However, we disagree to simply prohibit installation of discrepant parts that are specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD from the effective date of this AD. Paragraph (h) provides operators flexibility by providing the full compliance time as specified in paragraph (g) to modify or replace discrepant parts, unless the discrepant part is either currently installed as of the effective date of this AD and is subsequently modified or replaced (after the effective date of this AD) as stated in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, or has already been modified or replaced as of the effective date of this AD as stated in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Operators have the discretion to prohibit operation with a discrepant part in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD from the effective date of this AD. We have not changed the AD in this regard. Request To Clarify the Compliance Requirements JetBlue requested that we clarify the compliance requirements in paragraphs (g)(2), (g)(3), and (h)(2) of the proposed AD because of contradictory requirements. The commenter did not clearly identify which requirements needed clarification. We do not agree to revise paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. This AD and the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32- 1415, Revision 02, dated December 10, 2015, specify that, if corrosion is found in a non-permitted area, replace the BDDV before further flight. We have not changed this AD in this regard. As we stated previously, we have revised paragraph (g)(3) of this AD to clarify that operators should replace the old part number with a new part number as specified in figure 2 to paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(2) of this AD. We agree to clarify the compliance requirements of paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. As stated in the previous comment response, paragraph (h) is intended to provide operators flexibility by providing the full compliance time as specified in paragraph (g) to modify or replace discrepant parts. However, paragraph (h)(2) of this AD specifically prohibits installation of a discrepant part as of the effective date of this AD if the discrepant part has already been modified or replaced as of the effective date of this AD. Paragraph (h)(1) of this AD prohibits installation of a discrepant part as of the effective date of this AD, if a discrepant part is currently installed as of the effective of this AD, but is modified or replaced after the effective date of this AD. Operators have the discretion to prohibit operation with a discrepant part in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD from the effective date of this AD. We have not changed the AD in this regard. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 Airbus SAS has issued Service Bulletin A320-32-1203, Revision 02, dated February 9, 2001. This service information describes procedures for identifying the BDDV part number installed on the airplane, and modifying or replacing BDDVs having certain part numbers. Airbus SAS has also issued Service Bulletin A320-32-1415, Revision 02, dated December 10, 2015. This service information describes procedures for [[Page 56707]] modifying and re-identifying the BDDV. The modification includes modifying the drain hose of the BDDV, and doing all related investigative and corrective actions if applicable. The related investigative actions include an inspection for corrosion. Corrective actions include replacing the BDDV. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 1,136 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: Estimated Costs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Identification and modification or Up to 6 work-hours x Up to $395................. Up to $905................. Up to $1,028,080. replacement. $85 per hour = $510. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2018-23-11 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19497; Docket No. FAA-2018-0297; Product Identifier 2017-NM-181-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective December 19, 2018. (b) Affected ADs This AD affects AD 2001-15-10, Amendment 39-12344 (66 FR 39413, July 31, 2001) (``AD 2001-15-10''), and AD 2016-06-13, Amendment 39- 18444 (81 FR 17365, March 29, 2016) (``AD 2016-06-13''). (c) Applicability This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers, except those on which Airbus Modification 26925 has been embodied in production, which introduces a modified alternate braking system that removes the brake dual distribution valve (BDDV). (1) Airbus SAS Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, - 132, and -133 airplanes. (2) Airbus SAS Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes. (3) Airbus SAS Model A321-111, -112, -131,-211,-212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing gear. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by investigations that revealed that the cover seal of the brake dual distribution valve (BDDV) was damaged and did not ensure efficient sealing. We are issuing this AD to prevent water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss of braking system function after landing. These conditions could possibly result in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Identification and Modification or Replacement Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, identify the BDDV part number installed on the airplane. For each affected BDDV part number specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, do the actions in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable to identify the BDDV part number if the part number of the BDDV can be conclusively determined from that review. [[Page 56708]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.001 (1) Modify and re-identify the affected BDDV, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32- 1203, Revision 02, dated February 9, 2001. (2) Modify and re-identify the affected BDDV, and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1415, Revision 02, dated December 10, 2015. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. (3) Replace the affected BDDV with a BDDV having a part number not specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, or replace the old part number with a new part number as specified in figure 2 to paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(2) of this AD. Do the replacement using a method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.002 (h) Parts Installation Prohibition As of the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, no person may install a BDDV having a part number specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, on any airplane. (1) For any airplane that, on the effective date of this AD, has a BDDV installed with a part number specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD: After modification or replacement of the BDDV, as required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (2) For any airplane that, on the effective date of this AD, has a BDDV installed or replaced with a part number specified as `new P/ N' in figure 2 to paragraphs (g)(3) and (h)(2) of this AD, or has a BDDV installed or replaced with a part number not specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD: As of the effective date of this AD. (i) Terminating Action for Other ADs (1) Doing the actions in paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of AD 2001-15-10 for Model A319, A320 and A321 series airplanes. (2) Doing the actions in paragraph (g) of this AD terminates all of the requirements of AD 2016-06-13. (j) Credit for Previous Actions (1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using the service information in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) or (j)(1)(ii) of this AD. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1203, dated June 4, 1999, which was incorporated by reference in AD 2001-15-10. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1203, Revision 01, dated October 12, 2000. (2) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using the service information in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) or (j)(2)(ii) of this AD. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1415, dated September 2, 2014, which was incorporated by reference in AD 2016-06-13. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1415, Revision 01, dated April 23, 2015. (k) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus SAS's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's [[Page 56709]] maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. (l) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD 2017-0119, dated July 11, 2017, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0297. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD. (m) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1203, Revision 02, dated February 9, 2001. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1415, Revision 02, dated December 10, 2015. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; internet http://www.airbus.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on November 5, 2018. Christopher Spangenberg, Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2018-24688 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![56704 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
under the criteria of the Regulatory Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A350– (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A350–53–P024,
Flexibility Act. 53–P024, dated April 3, 2018. dated April 3, 2018.
(ii) [Reserved]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (h) Other FAA AD Provisions (3) For service information identified in
The following provisions also apply to this this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation AD: Office—EAL, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine
safety, Incorporation by reference, (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France;
Safety. (AMOCs): The Manager, International telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 93 45 80; email continued-
Adoption of the Amendment has the authority to approve AMOCs for this airworthiness.a350@airbus.com; internet
Accordingly, under the authority AD, if requested using the procedures found http://www.airbus.com.
delegated to me by the Administrator, in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR (4) You may view this service information
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 39.19, send your request to your principal at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
follows: inspector or local Flight Standards District 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
Office, as appropriate. If sending information information on the availability of this
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS directly to the International Section, send it material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
to the attention of the person identified in (5) You may view this service information
DIRECTIVES paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Information may that is incorporated by reference at the
be emailed to: 9-ANM–116-AMOC- National Archives and Records
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any Administration (NARA). For information on
continues to read as follows: approved AMOC, notify your appropriate the availability of this material at NARA, call
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. principal inspector, or lacking a principal 202–741–6030, or go to: http://
inspector, the manager of the local flight www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
§ 39.13 [Amended] standards district office/certificate holding locations.html.
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding district office.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
the following new airworthiness November 2, 2018.
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
directive (AD): actions from a manufacturer, the action must Jeffrey E. Duven,
2018–23–07 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39– be accomplished using a method approved Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
19493; Docket No. FAA–2018–0758; by the Manager, International Section, Certification Service.
Product Identifier 2018–NM–093–AD. Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the [FR Doc. 2018–24683 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
(a) Effective Date Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
This AD is effective December 19, 2018. Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOA-
(b) Affected ADs authorized signature. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
None. (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or Federal Aviation Administration
(c) Applicability
tests that are identified as RC, those
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model procedures and tests must be done to comply 14 CFR Part 39
A350–941 airplanes, certificated in any with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
category, except those on which Airbus [Docket No. FAA–2018–0297; Product
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
modification 110319 or Airbus modification Identifier 2017–NM–181–AD; Amendment
procedures and tests that are not identified
110348 has been embodied in production. 39–19497; AD 2018–23–11]
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s RIN 2120–AA64
(d) Subject
maintenance or inspection program without
Air Transport Association (ATA) of obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
America Code 53, Fuselage. the procedures and tests identified as RC can Airplanes
(e) Reason be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or AGENCY: Federal Aviation
This AD was prompted by a review of the changes to procedures or tests identified as Administration (FAA), Department of
Airbus A350 structure design principles RC require approval of an AMOC. Transportation (DOT).
database for type definition that revealed that
the balancer fitting part, installed on the tail (i) Related Information ACTION: Final rule.
cone, lower section of frame (FR) 103, has (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
several corrosion-resistant stainless steel nuts
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
installed on elementary aluminum parts, and 2018–0123, dated June 4, 2018, for related airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
this configuration does not meet the information. This MCAI may be found in the Airbus SAS Model A319 series
requirements for protection against corrosion. AD docket on the internet at http:// airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214,
We are issuing this AD to address this www.regulations.gov by searching for and –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
condition, which if not corrected, could locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0758. Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
reduce the structural integrity of the airplane. (2) For more information about this AD, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace This AD was prompted by
(f) Compliance Engineer, International Section, Transport
Comply with this AD within the
investigations that revealed that the
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
compliance times specified, unless already St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and cover seal of the brake dual distribution
done. fax 206–231–3218. valve (BDDV) was damaged and did not
ensure efficient sealing. This AD
(g) Required Action (j) Material Incorporated by Reference requires identifying the BDDV part
Within 72 months since the date of (1) The Director of the Federal Register number installed on the airplane, and
issuance of the original airworthiness approved the incorporation by reference modifying or replacing BDDVs having
certificate or the date of issuance of the (IBR) of the service information listed in this certain part numbers. We are issuing
original export certificate of airworthiness, paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
apply additional overcoat sealant and elastic part 51.
this AD to address the unsafe condition
varnish to the fastener heads and the anchor (2) You must use this service information on these products.
nuts of the balancer fitting at FR 103, in as applicable to do the actions required by DATES: This AD is effective December
accordance with the Accomplishment this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 19, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_56924/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 56705
The Director of the Federal Register We are issuing this AD to address need for correction and clarification.
approved the incorporation by reference water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of Consequently, this [EASA] AD retains the
of certain publications listed in this AD the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss requirements of EASA AD 2014–0251R1,
as of December 19, 2018. of braking system function after landing. which is superseded, and expands the list of
BDDV Part Numbers (P/N) which must be
ADDRESSES: For service information These conditions could possibly result removed from service and are no longer
identified in this final rule, contact in damage to the airplane and injury to eligible for installation on an aeroplane [and
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office— occupants. includes replacing affected part numbers as
EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: The European Aviation Safety Agency an option]. This [EASA] AD also clarifies the
2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; (EASA), which is the Technical Agent intended requirements of EASA AD 2014–
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 for the Member States of the European 0251 and introduces editorial changes, not
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth- Union, has issued EASA AD 2017–0119, affecting the requirements.
eas@airbus.com; internet http:// dated July 11, 2017 (referred to after this You may examine the MCAI in the
www.airbus.com. You may view this as the Mandatory Continuing AD docket on the internet at http://
service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the www.regulations.gov by searching for
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For for certain Airbus SAS Model A319 0297.
information on the availability of this series airplanes; Model A320–211, –212,
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; Comments
It is also available on the internet at and Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, We gave the public the opportunity to
http://www.regulations.gov by searching –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. participate in developing this final rule.
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– The MCAI states: The following presents the comments
0297. In 1998, an operator experienced a dual received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
Examining the AD Docket
loss of braking systems. Investigation results response to each comment.
revealed that the cover seal of the BDDV was
You may examine the AD docket on damaged and did not ensure the sealing Supportive Comments
the internet at http:// efficiency. Air Line Pilots Association,
www.regulations.gov by searching for This condition, if not corrected, could lead International stated its support for the
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– to water ingestion in the BDDV, freezing of
the BDDV in flight, and consequent loss of
NPRM. In addition, United Airlines
0297; or in person at Docket Operations (UAL) stated it concurs with the
braking system function after landing,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane expansion of the affected BDDV part
through Friday, except Federal holidays. and injury to occupants. numbers as identified in Figure 1 to
The AD docket contains this final rule, To address this potential unsafe condition, paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed
the regulatory evaluation, any Airbus issued Alert Operator Telex (AOT) AD.
comments received, and other 32–19 and Service Bulletin (SB) A320–32–
information. The address for Docket 1199, providing instructions for repetitive Request To Withdraw the NPRM
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is functional tests. In addition, Airbus Delta Air lines (DAL) requested that
U.S. Department of Transportation, developed mod 28301 and published SB
we withdraw the NPRM. DAL stated
A320–32–1203 to provide modification
Docket Operations, M–30, West that the NPRM does not address an
instructions.
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Consequently, DGAC [Directorate General unsafe condition and, therefore, it is
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, for Civil Aviation] France issued AD 2000– unnecessary. DAL commented that
Washington, DC 20590. 258–146 [which corresponds to FAA AD airplanes included in paragraph (c) of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2001–15–10, Amendment 39–12344 (66 FR the proposed AD are already required to
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, 39413, July 31, 2001) (‘‘AD 2001–15–10’’)] to comply with the actions required by AD
International Section, Transport require repetitive functional tests as a 2001–15–10, depending on modification
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South temporary solution (valid for a period of 15 status. DAL also commented that the
months) and modification of the BDDV with
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; NPRM does not add any airplanes to the
a new cover and installation of a draining
telephone and fax 206–231–3223. tube with a cap, which was terminating applicability of AD 2001–15–10 and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: action for the repetitive functional tests. For 2016–06–13. DAL stated that tracking
pre-mod 27833 and pre-SB A320–32–1200 compliance with the redundant
Discussion aeroplanes, repetitive inspections per SB requirements of the proposed AD would
We issued a notice of proposed A320–32–1199 were required as interim place an undue burden on airlines.
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR action, prior to the terminating action DAL stated that paragraphs (j)(1)(i)
part 39 by adding an AD that would modification per SB A320–32–1203. and (j)(2)(i) of the proposed AD give
apply to certain Airbus SAS Model After that [DGAC] AD was issued, credit for actions accomplished using
following a new event, Airbus developed a
A319 series airplanes; Model A320–211, new modification of the BDDV drain tube
previously issued service information.
–212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 which leaves it open, ensuring continuous DAL commented that FAA Letter ANM–
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, drainage of any ingested water, thereby 116–16–491, dated September 27, 2016,
–131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 preventing freezing of the brake system. gives operators the authority to
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Consequently, EASA issued AD 2014–0251 accomplish paragraph (g) of AD 2016–
Federal Register on April 17, 2018 (83 (later revised), partially retaining the 06–13 as an alternative method of
FR 16799). The NPRM was prompted by requirements of DGAC France AD 2000–258– compliance (AMOC), and it is also a
investigations that revealed that the 146, which was superseded, and requiring an terminating action for the actions
cover seal of the BDDV was damaged additional modification of the BDDV drain required by paragraphs (e) and (f) of AD
tube and re-identification of the BDDV.
and did not ensure efficient sealing. The Since EASA AD 2014–0251R1 [which
2001–15–10. DAL stated that the
NPRM proposed to require identifying corresponds to FAA AD 2016–06–13, compliance times for AD 2001–15–10
the BDDV part number installed on the Amendment 39–18444 (81 FR 17365, March and AD 2016–06–13 have passed,
airplane, and modifying or replacing 29, 2016) (‘‘AD 2016–06–13’’)] was issued, therefore, all airplanes must be in
BDDVs having certain part numbers. comments were received that indicated a compliance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_56924/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 56707
modifying and re-identifying the BDDV. inspection for corrosion. Corrective Costs of Compliance
The modification includes modifying actions include replacing the BDDV.
the drain hose of the BDDV, and doing This service information is reasonably We estimate that this AD affects 1,136
all related investigative and corrective available because the interested parties airplanes of U.S. registry.
actions if applicable. The related have access to it through their normal We estimate the following costs to
investigative actions include an course of business or by the means comply with this AD:
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
Identification and modification or re- Up to 6 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $395 ....... Up to $905 ....... Up to $1,028,080.
placement. $510.
We have received no definitive data distribution of power and 13, Amendment 39–18444 (81 FR 17365,
that would enable us to provide cost responsibilities among the various March 29, 2016) (‘‘AD 2016–06–13’’).
estimates for the on-condition actions levels of government. (c) Applicability
specified in this AD. For the reasons discussed above, I This AD applies to the airplanes identified
certify that this AD: in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this AD,
Authority for This Rulemaking
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory certificated in any category, all manufacturer
Title 49 of the United States Code action’’ under Executive Order 12866, serial numbers, except those on which
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Airbus Modification 26925 has been
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the DOT Regulatory Policies and embodied in production, which introduces a
section 106, describes the authority of Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, modified alternate braking system that
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 1979), removes the brake dual distribution valve
Aviation Programs, describes in more (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation (BDDV).
detail the scope of the Agency’s (1) Airbus SAS Model A319–111, –112,
in Alaska, and –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133
authority. (4) Will not have a significant airplanes.
We are issuing this rulemaking under economic impact, positive or negative, (2) Airbus SAS Model A320–211, –212,
the authority described in Subtitle VII, on a substantial number of small entities –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes.
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: under the criteria of the Regulatory (3) Airbus SAS Model A321–111, –112,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Flexibility Act. –131,–211,–212, –213, –231, and –232
section, Congress charges the FAA with airplanes.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(d) Subject
air commerce by prescribing regulations Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
for practices, methods, and procedures safety, Incorporation by reference, America Code 32, Landing gear.
the Administrator finds necessary for Safety.
safety in air commerce. This regulation (e) Reason
Adoption of the Amendment
is within the scope of that authority This AD was prompted by investigations
because it addresses an unsafe condition Accordingly, under the authority that revealed that the cover seal of the brake
that is likely to exist or develop on delegated to me by the Administrator, dual distribution valve (BDDV) was damaged
products identified in this rulemaking the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as and did not ensure efficient sealing. We are
action. follows: issuing this AD to prevent water ingestion in
the BDDV, freezing of the BDDV in flight, and
This AD is issued in accordance with consequent loss of braking system function
authority delegated by the Executive PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES after landing. These conditions could
Director, Aircraft Certification Service, possibly result in damage to the airplane and
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. injury to occupants.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
In accordance with that order, issuance
continues to read as follows: (f) Compliance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Comply with this AD within the
Division, but during this transition compliance times specified, unless already
§ 39.13 [Amended] done.
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding (g) Identification and Modification or
applicable to transport category the following new airworthiness Replacement
airplanes and associated appliances to directive (AD): Within 3 months after the effective date of
the Director of the System Oversight 2018–23–11 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39– this AD, identify the BDDV part number
Division. 19497; Docket No. FAA–2018–0297; installed on the airplane. For each affected
Product Identifier 2017–NM–181–AD. BDDV part number specified in figure 1 to
Regulatory Findings paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, within 3
(a) Effective Date months after the effective date of this AD, do
This AD will not have federalism
This AD is effective December 19, 2018. the actions in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3)
implications under Executive Order of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance
13132. This AD will not have a (b) Affected ADs records is acceptable to identify the BDDV
substantial direct effect on the States, on This AD affects AD 2001–15–10, part number if the part number of the BDDV
the relationship between the national Amendment 39–12344 (66 FR 39413, July 31, can be conclusively determined from that
government and the States, or on the 2001) (‘‘AD 2001–15–10’’), and AD 2016–06– review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_56924/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 56709
maintenance or inspection program without DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
the procedures and tests identified as RC can Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC 20590.
be done and the airplane can be put back in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or 14 CFR Part 39 Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer,
changes to procedures or tests identified as
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0637; Product International Section, Transport
RC require approval of an AMOC.
Identifier 2018–NM–091–AD; Amendment Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
(l) Related Information 39–19496; AD 2018–23–10] 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing RIN 2120–AA64 telephone and fax 206–231–3218.
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2017–0119, dated July 11, 2017, for related Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes Discussion
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at http:// We issued a notice of proposed
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
www.regulations.gov by searching for and rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
Administration (FAA), Department of
locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0297. part 39 by adding an AD that would
(2) For more information about this AD,
Transportation (DOT).
apply to certain Airbus SAS Model
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, ACTION: Final rule. A350–941 airplanes. The NPRM
International Section, Transport Standards published in the Federal Register on
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain August 2, 2018 (83 FR 37766). The
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206– NPRM was prompted by leakage of
231–3223.
Airbus SAS Model A350–941 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by leakage of shrouded pipe T-boxes in the potable
(3) Service information identified in this water system. The NPRM proposed to
AD that is not incorporated by reference is shrouded pipe T-boxes in the potable
water system. This AD requires require replacement of the affected
available at the addresses specified in potable water T-boxes and clamps with
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD. replacement of the affected potable
water T-boxes and clamps with new new parts.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference parts. We are issuing this AD to address We are issuing this AD to address the
(1) The Director of the Federal Register the unsafe condition on these products. possible leakage of water into the
approved the incorporation by reference
avionics bay. This condition, if not
DATES: This AD is effective December
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
corrected, could lead to the loss of
19, 2018. systems/equipment located inside the
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR The Director of the Federal Register
part 51. avionics bay and possible loss of control
approved the incorporation by reference of the airplane.
(2) You must use this service information of a certain publication listed in this AD
as applicable to do the actions required by The European Aviation Safety Agency
as of December 19, 2018.
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
ADDRESSES: For service information for the Member States of the European
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–32–1203,
identified in this final rule, contact Union, has issued EASA AD 2018–
Revision 02, dated February 9, 2001.
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office— 0111R1, dated May 30, 2018 (referred to
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–32–1415,
EAL, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Revision 02, dated December 10, 2015.
(3) For service information identified in
2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
Office—EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine
61 93 45 80; email continued- for certain Airbus SAS Model A350–941
No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; airworthiness.a350@airbus.com; airplanes. The MCAI states:
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 internet http://www.airbus.com. You
may view this service information at the During a pressure test on the A350 Final
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ Assembly Line (FAL), leakage was observed
airbus.com; internet http://www.airbus.com. FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 on the potable water system shrouded pipes,
(4) You may view this service information South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For due to a crack failure on the T-Boxes.
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, information on the availability of this Leakage of a primary pipe may cause water
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. ingress into the avionics bay. Additionally,
information on the availability of this It is also available on the internet at during another pressure proof test on the
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. http://www.regulations.gov by searching A350 FAL, loss of torque was detected on the
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– clamps used to attach the shrouded pipes on
(5) You may view this service information
0637. the T-Boxes.
that is incorporated by reference at the
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
National Archives and Records Examining the AD Docket to loss of systems/equipment located inside
Administration (NARA). For information on the avionics bay, possibly resulting in an
the availability of this material at NARA, call You may examine the AD docket on unsafe condition.
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// the internet at http:// Prompted by these findings, Airbus
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- www.regulations.gov by searching for developed improved potable water T-Boxes
locations.html. and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– and clamps, which are embodied in
0637; or in person at Docket Operations production through Airbus mod 111435 or
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on mod 111440, and introduced in service
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
November 5, 2018. through the SB [Service Bulletin A350–38–
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Christopher Spangenberg, The AD docket contains this final rule, P004].
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, the regulatory evaluation, any For the reasons described above, this
Aircraft Certification Service. [EASA] AD requires replacement of the
comments received, and other affected potable water shrouded pipe
[FR Doc. 2018–24688 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am] information. The address for Docket T-Boxes and clamps with new parts.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is This [EASA] AD was revised to exclude
U.S. Department of Transportation, post-mod 111440 aeroplanes from the
Docket Operations, M–30, West Applicability.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_56924/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 03:32:16
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 03:32:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective December 19, 2018. | |
| Contact | Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 56704 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR