83_FR_56962 83 FR 56742 - Almonds Grown in California; Proposed Amendments to Marketing Order 981 and Referendum Order

83 FR 56742 - Almonds Grown in California; Proposed Amendments to Marketing Order 981 and Referendum Order

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)

Page Range56742-56746
FR Document2018-24727

This rulemaking proposes amendments to Marketing Order No. 981, which regulates the handling of almonds in California. The Almond Board of California (Board) recommended changing the dates associated with the process to nominate members to the Board as well as the start of the term of office of members of the Board. The Board also recommended adding authority to allow future revisions of the nomination methods and term of office start date through the development of regulations using informal rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56742-56746]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24727]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 56742]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 981

[AMS-SC-18-0018; SC18-981-3]


Almonds Grown in California; Proposed Amendments to Marketing 
Order 981 and Referendum Order

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rulemaking proposes amendments to Marketing Order No. 
981, which regulates the handling of almonds in California. The Almond 
Board of California (Board) recommended changing the dates associated 
with the process to nominate members to the Board as well as the start 
of the term of office of members of the Board. The Board also 
recommended adding authority to allow future revisions of the 
nomination methods and term of office start date through the 
development of regulations using informal rulemaking.

DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 25, 2019, through 
April 5, 2019. The representative period for the referendum is August 
1, 2017, through July 31, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie Wray, Senior Marketing 
Specialist, or Michelle Sharrow, Deputy Director, Marketing Order and 
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; 
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: 
Debbie.Wray@usda.gov or Michelle.Sharrow@usda.gov.
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement 
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue 
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, 
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or email: Richard.Lower@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
proposes amendments to regulations issued to carry out a marketing 
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal is issued under 
Marketing Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the 
handling of almonds grown in California. Part 981 (referred to as the 
``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 
``Act.'' Section 608c(17) of the Act and the applicable rules of 
practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing 
agreements and orders (7 CFR part 900) authorizes amendment of the 
Order through this informal rulemaking action.
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls 
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. 
Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition 
of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the 
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum 
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order 
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling 
Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
    This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. This rulemaking is not intended to have retroactive 
effect.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of 
entry of the ruling.
    Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 
(2008 Farm Bill)(Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 608c(17) of the Act, 
which in turn required the addition of supplemental rules of practice 
to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 2008). The amendment of 
section 608c(17) of the Act and additional supplemental rules of 
practice authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to 
amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and 
orders. USDA may use informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders 
based on the nature and complexity of the proposed amendments, the 
potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any 
other relevant matters.
    AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the 
amendments proposed are not unduly complex and the nature of the 
proposed amendments is appropriate for utilizing the informal 
rulemaking process to amend the Order.
    The proposed amendments were unanimously recommended by the Board 
following deliberations at a public meeting held on December 4, 2017. 
The proposal would amend the Order by: (1) Changing the nomination 
deadline for Board nominees from January 20 to April 1, the deadline 
for presenting nominees to USDA for selection from February 20 to June 
1, and the start of the term of office from March 1 to August 1; (2) 
adding the ability to propose future revisions to Board nomination 
methods by developing regulations through informal rulemaking; and (3) 
adding the ability to propose future revisions to the start date of the 
Board's term of office by developing regulations through informal 
rulemaking. In addition to these proposals, AMS proposes to make any 
additional changes to the Order as may be necessary to conform to any 
amendment that may result from this rulemaking action.
    A proposed rule soliciting comments on the proposed amendments was 
issued on July 2, 2018, and published in the Federal Register on July 
6, 2018 (83 FR 31473). One comment was received,

[[Page 56743]]

but it did not pertain to this proposal; therefore, no changes were 
made to the proposed amendments. AMS will conduct a grower referendum 
to determine support for the proposed amendments. If appropriate, a 
final rule will then be issued to effectuate the amendments favored by 
growers in the referendum.
    The Board's proposed amendments would amend the Order by changing 
the dates associated with the process to nominate members to the Board, 
changing the start date for the term of office of members of the Board, 
and adding authority to the Order to allow future revisions of the 
nomination methods and term of office start date through the 
development of regulations using informal rulemaking.

Proposal 1--Nomination and Term of Office Dates

    Section 981.32 provides that, each year, nominees for open Board 
member and alternate member positions shall be chosen by ballot 
delivered to the Board. In support of this nomination process, Sec.  
981.32 further provides that on or before January 20 of each year, the 
Board shall mail to all handlers and growers, other than the 
cooperative(s) of record, the required ballots with all necessary 
voting information; and that nominees chosen shall be submitted by the 
Board to the USDA Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) on or before 
February 20 of each year. If a nomination for any Board member or 
alternate is not received by the Secretary on or before February 20, 
the Secretary may select, without nomination, such member or alternate 
from persons belonging to the group to be represented.
    Section 981.33 provides that the term of office of Board members 
and alternate members selected by the Secretary pursuant to Sec.  
981.32 shall begin on March 1.
    This proposal would amend Sec.  981.32 by changing the nomination 
deadline for Board nominees from January 20 to April 1 and the deadline 
for presenting nominees for selection to the Secretary from February 20 
to June 1. It would also amend Sec.  981.33 by changing the start of 
the term of office from March 1 to August 1. A clarifying change would 
also be made to Sec.  981.33 to remove language related to a previous 
amendment to the Order that is no longer needed.
    Changing the two nomination process dates from January 20 and 
February 20 to April 1 and June 1, respectively, could provide several 
benefits. First, preparing ballots to mail in January is very 
challenging for the Board because it prepares for and hosts major 
industry activities in December, including a Board meeting and a large, 
multi-day almond conference that is held at an off-site location. The 
Board office is also closed the last week of December every year. 
Because of these year-end activities, it is difficult for the Board to 
prepare for a nomination mailing in January. Changing the nomination 
dates would allow the Board enough time to prepare nominations for 
mailing.
    In addition, the Board believes that more industry members might 
participate in the nomination process if it occurred later in the 
calendar year. This is because many industry members are busy with or 
returning from winter holiday season activities in December and January 
and, therefore, may be less likely to participate in nomination 
proceedings that are occurring at that time.
    In addition to the challenges the Board faces in meeting the 
January nomination deadline, there is currently only one month between 
the deadline for mailing ballots (January 20) and the date that the 
Board must process returned ballots and prepare a nomination package to 
submit to USDA (February 20). In addition to this short timeframe, 
there are only 9 or 10 days between the February 20 deadline by which 
the Board must submit nominations to USDA and the March 1 term of 
office start date. This short timeframe does not provide adequate time 
for the nominations to be processed and new member selections to be 
made prior to the new term of office. The proposed changes would 
provide 60 days between the April 1 and June 1 nomination process 
deadline dates, compared to the existing 30 days between the current 
dates of January 20 and February 20. The proposed changes would also 
provide 60 days between the June 1 deadline for the Board to submit the 
nominations to USDA and the new August 1 term of office start date, 
compared to the existing 10 days between the current dates of February 
20 and March 1. Extending the times between these dates would improve 
the overall preparation and processing of nominations.
    The proposal to change the term of office start date would improve 
Board cohesiveness because the Board would then operate on the same 
timeline as the crop year and the Board's committees. The Order's crop 
year is defined in Sec.  981.19 as August 1 through July 31. The Board 
is responsible for all program planning and budgeting for each crop 
year. However, with the current term of office beginning on March 1, 
Board members responsible for annual program planning and budget 
recommendations leave office prior to the end of the crop year; 
conversely, new Board members also begin serving in the middle of a 
crop year. Starting the term of office on August 1 would allow Board 
members to administer activities for an entire crop year as well as 
provide valuable insight related to the next crop year's activities. 
Changing the start of the term of office to August 1 would align with 
the appointment of individuals to various committees that operate under 
the Board, which occurs at the beginning of each crop year.
    Changing the term of office start date from March 1 to August 1 
would require current members and alternates to serve a few additional 
months, beyond the original March 1 start date, until their respective 
successors were selected and qualified pursuant to Sec.  981.33(a).
    These changes to the nomination and term of office dates that 
appear in two sections of the Order (Sec. Sec.  981.32 and 981.33) are 
being proposed as a single amendment because of the relation of the 
nomination process to the start date of the term of office; that is, if 
the nomination process dates are changed to occur later in the calendar 
year (on April 1 and June 1, respectively, as described above), then 
the start date of the term of office would also need to change from 
March 1 to a date that would follow the new nomination process dates. 
As noted above, the Board recommended the term of office start date be 
changed to August 1.
    For the reasons stated above, it is proposed that Sec.  981.32, 
Nominations, be amended by changing the nomination deadline for Board 
nominees from January 20 to April 1 and the deadline for presenting 
nominees for selection to the Secretary from February 20 to June 1. 
Further, it is proposed that Sec.  981.33, Selection and term of 
office, be amended by changing the start of the term of office from 
March 1 to August 1 and by making a clarifying change to remove 
language related to a previous amendment to the Order that is no longer 
needed.

Proposal 2--Regulation Authority for Nomination Methods

    Section 981.32 provides the methods by which nominations for open 
Board member and alternate member positions shall be chosen, including 
the dates by which (1) ballots and voting information shall be mailed 
by the Board to all handlers and growers, other than cooperative(s) of 
record, and (2) nominations shall be submitted by the Board to the 
Secretary. Changes to these dates are included in Proposal 1 above.

[[Page 56744]]

    This proposal would change Sec.  981.32 by adding authority to 
modify the nomination methods described in paragraph (a) through the 
future development of regulations using the informal rulemaking 
process. Currently, changes to the nomination methods require formal 
rulemaking. The Board would still be required to discuss future 
proposed changes at its meetings and to vote on whether to recommend 
changes to USDA. If amended, future changes would still require notice 
be given to the public with an opportunity for the public to comment on 
the proposed changes. However, it is anticipated that this proposed 
amendment would streamline future changes to the Order by allowing such 
changes to be proposed and finalized using informal rulemaking.
    For the reasons stated above, it is proposed that Sec.  981.32, 
Nominations, be amended by adding a new paragraph that would provide 
the Board with authority to modify its nomination methods by developing 
regulations using the informal rulemaking process.

Proposal 3--Regulation Authority for Term of Office Start Date

    Section 981.33 provides that the term of office of Board members 
and alternate members selected by the Secretary pursuant to Sec.  
981.32 shall begin on March 1. A change to this term of office start 
date is included in Proposal 1.
    This proposal would change Sec.  981.33 by adding authority to 
modify the term of office start date through the future development of 
regulations using the informal rulemaking process. Currently, changes 
to the term of office start date require formal rulemaking. The Board 
would still be required to discuss a future proposed change at its 
meetings and to vote on whether to recommend a change to USDA. If 
amended, a future change to the term of office start date would still 
require notice be given to the public with an opportunity for the 
public to comment on the proposed change. However, it is anticipated 
that this proposed amendment would streamline future changes to the 
Order by allowing such changes to be proposed and finalized using 
informal rulemaking.
    For the reasons stated above, it is proposed that Sec.  981.33, 
Selection and term of office, be amended by adding a new paragraph that 
would provide the Board with authority to modify the term of office 
start date by developing regulations using the informal rulemaking 
process.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the 
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 6,800 almond growers in the production area 
and approximately 100 almond handlers subject to regulation under the 
Order. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small 
Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less 
than $7,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those 
having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
    The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported in its 
2012 Agricultural Census that there were 6,841 almond farms in the 
production area (California), of which 6,204 had bearing acres. The 
following computation provides an estimate of the proportion of 
agricultural producers (farms) and agricultural service firms 
(handlers) that would be considered small under the SBA definitions.
    The NASS Census data indicates that out of the 6,204 California 
farms with bearing acres of almonds, 4,471 (72 percent) have fewer than 
100 bearing acres.
    For the almond industry's most recently reported crop year (2016), 
NASS reported an average yield of 2,280 pounds per acre and a season 
average grower price of $2.44 per pound. A 100-acre farm with an 
average yield of 2,280 pounds per acre would produce about 228,000 
pounds of almonds. At $2.44 per pound, that farm's production would be 
valued at $556,320. The Census of Agriculture indicates that the 
majority of California's almond farms are smaller than 100 acres; 
therefore, it could be concluded that the majority of growers had 
annual receipts from the sale of almonds in 2016-17 of less than 
$556,320, which is below the SBA threshold of $750,000. Thus, over 70 
percent of California's almond growers would be classified as small 
entities according to SBA's definition.
    To estimate the proportion of almond handlers that would be 
considered small businesses, it was assumed that the unit value per 
shelled pound of almonds exported in a particular year could serve as a 
representative almond price at the handler level. A unit value for a 
commodity is the value of exports divided by the quantity. Data from 
USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service showed that the value of almond 
exports from August 2016 to July 2017 (combining shelled and inshell 
almonds) was $4.072 billion. The quantity of almond exports over that 
period was 1.406 billion pounds, combining shelled exports and the 
shelled equivalent of inshell exports. Dividing the export value by the 
quantity yields a unit value of $2.90 per pound. Subtracting this 
figure from the NASS 2016 estimate of season average grower price per 
pound ($2.44) yields $0.46 per pound as a representative grower-handler 
margin. Applying the $2.90 representative handler price per pound to 
2016-17 handler shipment quantities provided by the Board showed that 
approximately 40 percent of California's almond handlers shipped 
almonds valued under $7,500,000 during the 2016-17 crop year and would 
therefore be considered small entities according to the SBA definition.
    The proposed amendments would change the dates associated with the 
process to nominate Board members and alternates as well as the start 
of the term of office of Board members. The proposed amendments would 
also add authority to allow future revisions of the nomination methods 
and term of office dates through the development of regulations using 
informal rulemaking. These amendments would improve the nomination 
process, align the term of office with the crop year and appointment of 
Board committees, and streamline the process for making similar changes 
in the future.
    The Board's proposed amendments were unanimously recommended at a 
public meeting of the Board on December 4, 2017. The proposed 
amendments are administrative in nature; therefore, if any or all the 
proposals are approved in referendum, there should be no economic 
impact on growers or handlers. Changing the nomination dates could 
encourage greater industry participation on the Board because the 
timing of the current nominations occurs immediately after the winter 
holiday season, when many industry members are just returning to their 
operations and may be less inclined to participate. The changes to the 
nomination process dates and the term of office start date are expected 
to

[[Page 56745]]

streamline and improve operations of the Board. Adding authority to 
allow the development of regulations through informal rulemaking for 
making future changes to the nomination methods and term of office 
start date could reduce the time it takes to implement the changes, 
thereby allowing the Board to function more effectively.
    Alternatives to the proposals, including recommending no changes, 
were considered. However, the Board believes that changing the 
nomination process dates and term of office start date, as well as 
adding authority to make similar changes in the future by creating 
regulations through informal rulemaking, will be beneficial to the 
industry by enhancing Board operations and effectiveness.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Vegetable 
and Specialty Crops). No changes in those requirements because of this 
action would be necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they 
would be submitted to OMB for approval.
    As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA 
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, 
or conflict with this rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    The Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the almond 
industry. All interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and 
encouraged to participate in Board deliberations on all issues. Like 
all Board meetings, the December 4, 2017, meeting was public, and all 
entities, both large and small, were encouraged to express their views 
on these proposals.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on July 6, 2018 (83 FR 31473). Copies of the proposed rule 
were sent via email to all Board members and almond handlers. Finally, 
the rule was made available through the internet by USDA and the Office 
of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending September 4, 
2018, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the 
proposal. One comment was received, but it did not pertain to this 
proposal; therefore, no changes were made to the proposed amendments.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any 
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at 
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

Findings and Conclusions

    The findings and conclusions and general findings and 
determinations included in the proposed rule set forth in the July 6, 
2018, issue of the Federal Register are hereby approved and adopted.

Marketing Order

    Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled 
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Almonds Grown in 
California.'' This document has been decided upon as the detailed and 
appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings and 
conclusions. It is hereby ordered that this entire rule be published in 
the Federal Register.

Referendum Order

    It is hereby directed that a grower referendum be conducted in 
accordance with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR 
900.400-407) to determine whether the annexed order amending the Order 
regulating the handling of almonds grown in California is approved by 
growers who have engaged in the production of almonds within the 
production area during the representative period. The representative 
period for the conduct of such referendum is hereby determined to be 
August 1, 2017, to July 31, 2018.
    The agents of the Secretary to conduct such referendum are 
designated to be Peter Sommers and Terry Vawter, California Marketing 
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops 
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or 
Email: PeterR.Sommers@usda.gov or Terry.Vawter@usda.gov., respectively.

Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Almonds Grown in 
California \1\

Findings and Determinations

    The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the 
findings and determinations which were previously made in connection 
with the issuance of the marketing order; and all said previous 
findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except 
insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the 
findings and determinations set forth herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the 
requirements of Sec.  900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure 
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and 
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further 
amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to 
effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
    2. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further 
amended, regulates the handling of almonds grown in California in the 
same manner as, and are applicable only to, persons in the respective 
classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order;
    3. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further 
amended, is limited in application to the smallest regional production 
area which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared 
policy of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to 
subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the 
declared policy of the Act;
    4. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further 
amended, prescribe, insofar as practicable, such different terms 
applicable to different parts of the production area as are necessary 
to give due recognition to the differences in the production and 
marketing of almonds produced in the production area; and
    5. All handling of almonds produced in the production area as 
defined in the Order is in the current of interstate or foreign 
commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.

Order Relative to Handling

    It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date 
hereof, all handling of almonds grown in California shall be in 
conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the 
said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows:
    The provisions of the proposed marketing order amending the Order

[[Page 56746]]

contained in the proposed rule issued by the Administrator on July 2, 
2018, and published in the Federal Register (83 FR 31473) on July 6, 
2018, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending 
the Order and are set forth in full herein.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981

    Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: November 7, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
    For the reasons discussed in the Preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is 
proposed to be amended as follows.

PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

0
2. Amend Sec.  981.32 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and adding paragraph 
(a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  981.32  Nominations.

    (a) Method. (1) Each year the terms of office of three of the 
members elected pursuant to Sec.  981.31(a) and (b) shall expire, 
except every third year when the term of office for two of those 
members shall expire. Nominees for each respective member and alternate 
member shall be chosen by ballot delivered to the Board. Nominees 
chosen by the Board in this manner shall be submitted by the Board to 
the Secretary on or before June 1 of each year together with such 
information as the Secretary may require. If a nomination for any Board 
member or alternate is not received by the Secretary on or before June 
1, the Secretary may select such member or alternate from persons 
belonging to the group to be represented without nomination. The Board 
shall mail to all handlers and growers, other than the cooperative(s) 
of record, the required ballots with all necessary voting information 
including the names of incumbents willing to accept renomination, and, 
to such growers, the name of any person proposed for nomination in a 
petition signed by at least 15 such growers and filed with the Board on 
or before April 1. Distribution of ballots shall be announced by press 
release, furnishing pertinent information on balloting, issued by the 
Board through newspapers and other publications having general 
circulation in the almond producing areas.
* * * * *
    (3) The Board may recommend, subject to the approval of the 
Secretary, a change to the nomination method, should the Board 
determine that a revision is necessary.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec.  981.33 by revising the first sentence of paragraphs (a) 
and (b), revising the last sentence of paragraph (c), and adding 
paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  981.33  Selection and term of office.

    (a) Members and their respective alternates for positions open on 
the Board shall be selected by the Secretary from persons nominated 
pursuant to Sec.  981.32, or, at the discretion of the Secretary, from 
other qualified persons, for a term of office beginning August 1. * * *
    (b) The term of office of members of the Board shall be for a 
period of three years beginning on August 1 of the years selected 
except where otherwise provided. * * *
    (c) * * * This limitation on tenure shall not apply to alternate 
members.
    (d) The Board may recommend, subject to approval of the Secretary, 
revisions to the start date for the term of office of members of the 
Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-24727 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P



     56742

     Proposed Rules                                                                                                Federal Register
                                                                                                                   Vol. 83, No. 220

                                                                                                                   Wednesday, November 14, 2018



     This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,                     the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
     contains notices to the public of the proposed          DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–                  or her principal place of business, has
     issuance of rules and regulations. The                  2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or email:                  jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
     purpose of these notices is to give interested          Richard.Lower@usda.gov.                               the petition, provided an action is filed
     persons an opportunity to participate in the                                                                  no later than 20 days after the date of
     rule making prior to the adoption of the final          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
     rules.                                                  proposal, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,                   entry of the ruling.
                                                             proposes amendments to regulations                       Section 1504 of the Food,
                                                             issued to carry out a marketing order as              Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
     DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal              (2008 Farm Bill)(Pub. L. 110–246)
                                                             is issued under Marketing Order No.                   amended section 608c(17) of the Act,
     Agricultural Marketing Service                          981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),                     which in turn required the addition of
                                                             regulating the handling of almonds                    supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR
     7 CFR Part 981                                          grown in California. Part 981 (referred to            part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21,
     [AMS–SC–18–0018; SC18–981–3]                            as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the              2008). The amendment of section
                                                             Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act                  608c(17) of the Act and additional
     Almonds Grown in California;                            of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),               supplemental rules of practice authorize
     Proposed Amendments to Marketing                        hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’               the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C.
     Order 981 and Referendum Order                          Section 608c(17) of the Act and the                   553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable,
                                                             applicable rules of practice and                      and nut marketing agreements and
     AGENCY:  Agricultural Marketing Service,                procedure governing the formulation of                orders. USDA may use informal
     USDA.                                                   marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR                rulemaking to amend marketing orders
     ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum                    part 900) authorizes amendment of the                 based on the nature and complexity of
     order.                                                  Order through this informal rulemaking                the proposed amendments, the potential
                                                             action.                                               regulatory and economic impacts on
     SUMMARY:    This rulemaking proposes                       The Department of Agriculture                      affected entities, and any other relevant
     amendments to Marketing Order No.                       (USDA) is issuing this rule in                        matters.
     981, which regulates the handling of                    conformance with Executive Orders                        AMS has considered these factors and
     almonds in California. The Almond                       13563 and 13175. This action falls                    has determined that the amendments
     Board of California (Board)                             within a category of regulatory actions               proposed are not unduly complex and
     recommended changing the dates                          that the Office of Management and                     the nature of the proposed amendments
     associated with the process to nominate                 Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive                  is appropriate for utilizing the informal
     members to the Board as well as the                     Order 12866 review. Additionally,                     rulemaking process to amend the Order.
     start of the term of office of members of               because this proposed rule does not                      The proposed amendments were
     the Board. The Board also                               meet the definition of a significant                  unanimously recommended by the
     recommended adding authority to allow                   regulatory action, it does not trigger the            Board following deliberations at a
     future revisions of the nomination                      requirements contained in Executive                   public meeting held on December 4,
     methods and term of office start date                   Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum                     2017. The proposal would amend the
     through the development of regulations                  titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing                Order by: (1) Changing the nomination
     using informal rulemaking.                              Section 2 of the Executive Order of                   deadline for Board nominees from
     DATES: The referendum will be                           January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing                    January 20 to April 1, the deadline for
     conducted from March 25, 2019,                          Regulation and Controlling Regulatory                 presenting nominees to USDA for
     through April 5, 2019. The                              Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).                         selection from February 20 to June 1,
     representative period for the referendum                   This proposal has been reviewed                    and the start of the term of office from
     is August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2018.               under Executive Order 12988, Civil                    March 1 to August 1; (2) adding the
     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Justice Reform. This rulemaking is not                ability to propose future revisions to
     Debbie Wray, Senior Marketing                           intended to have retroactive effect.                  Board nomination methods by
     Specialist, or Michelle Sharrow, Deputy                    The Act provides that administrative               developing regulations through informal
     Director, Marketing Order and                           proceedings must be exhausted before                  rulemaking; and (3) adding the ability to
     Agreement Division, Specialty Crops                     parties may file suit in court. Under                 propose future revisions to the start date
     Program, AMS, USDA, 1400                                section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any                   of the Board’s term of office by
     Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237,                      handler subject to an order may file                  developing regulations through informal
     Washington, DC 20250–0237;                              with USDA a petition stating that the                 rulemaking. In addition to these
     Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)                   order, any provision of the order, or any             proposals, AMS proposes to make any
     720–8938, or Email: Debbie.Wray@                        obligation imposed in connection with                 additional changes to the Order as may
     usda.gov or Michelle.Sharrow@                           the order is not in accordance with law               be necessary to conform to any
     usda.gov.                                               and request a modification of the order               amendment that may result from this
        Small businesses may request                         or to be exempted therefrom. A handler                rulemaking action.
     information on complying with this                      is afforded the opportunity for a hearing                A proposed rule soliciting comments
     regulation by contacting Richard Lower,                 on the petition. After the hearing, USDA              on the proposed amendments was
     Marketing Order and Agreement                           would rule on the petition. The Act                   issued on July 2, 2018, and published in
     Division, Specialty Crops Program,                      provides that the district court of the               the Federal Register on July 6, 2018 (83
     AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence                            United States in any district in which                FR 31473). One comment was received,


VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:15 Nov 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM   14NOP1


                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                           56743

     but it did not pertain to this proposal;                it prepares for and hosts major industry              program planning and budget
     therefore, no changes were made to the                  activities in December, including a                   recommendations leave office prior to
     proposed amendments. AMS will                           Board meeting and a large, multi-day                  the end of the crop year; conversely,
     conduct a grower referendum to                          almond conference that is held at an off-             new Board members also begin serving
     determine support for the proposed                      site location. The Board office is also               in the middle of a crop year. Starting the
     amendments. If appropriate, a final rule                closed the last week of December every                term of office on August 1 would allow
     will then be issued to effectuate the                   year. Because of these year-end                       Board members to administer activities
     amendments favored by growers in the                    activities, it is difficult for the Board to          for an entire crop year as well as
     referendum.                                             prepare for a nomination mailing in                   provide valuable insight related to the
       The Board’s proposed amendments                       January. Changing the nomination dates                next crop year’s activities. Changing the
     would amend the Order by changing the                   would allow the Board enough time to                  start of the term of office to August 1
     dates associated with the process to                    prepare nominations for mailing.                      would align with the appointment of
     nominate members to the Board,                             In addition, the Board believes that               individuals to various committees that
     changing the start date for the term of                 more industry members might                           operate under the Board, which occurs
     office of members of the Board, and                     participate in the nomination process if              at the beginning of each crop year.
     adding authority to the Order to allow                  it occurred later in the calendar year.                  Changing the term of office start date
     future revisions of the nomination                      This is because many industry members                 from March 1 to August 1 would require
     methods and term of office start date                   are busy with or returning from winter                current members and alternates to serve
     through the development of regulations                  holiday season activities in December                 a few additional months, beyond the
     using informal rulemaking.                              and January and, therefore, may be less               original March 1 start date, until their
                                                             likely to participate in nomination                   respective successors were selected and
     Proposal 1—Nomination and Term of
                                                             proceedings that are occurring at that                qualified pursuant to § 981.33(a).
     Office Dates
                                                             time.                                                    These changes to the nomination and
        Section 981.32 provides that, each                      In addition to the challenges the
     year, nominees for open Board member                                                                          term of office dates that appear in two
                                                             Board faces in meeting the January
     and alternate member positions shall be                                                                       sections of the Order (§§ 981.32 and
                                                             nomination deadline, there is currently
     chosen by ballot delivered to the Board.                only one month between the deadline                   981.33) are being proposed as a single
     In support of this nomination process,                  for mailing ballots (January 20) and the              amendment because of the relation of
     § 981.32 further provides that on or                    date that the Board must process                      the nomination process to the start date
     before January 20 of each year, the                     returned ballots and prepare a                        of the term of office; that is, if the
     Board shall mail to all handlers and                    nomination package to submit to USDA                  nomination process dates are changed to
     growers, other than the cooperative(s) of               (February 20). In addition to this short              occur later in the calendar year (on
     record, the required ballots with all                   timeframe, there are only 9 or 10 days                April 1 and June 1, respectively, as
     necessary voting information; and that                  between the February 20 deadline by                   described above), then the start date of
     nominees chosen shall be submitted by                   which the Board must submit                           the term of office would also need to
     the Board to the USDA Secretary of                      nominations to USDA and the March 1                   change from March 1 to a date that
     Agriculture (Secretary) on or before                    term of office start date. This short                 would follow the new nomination
     February 20 of each year. If a                          timeframe does not provide adequate                   process dates. As noted above, the
     nomination for any Board member or                      time for the nominations to be                        Board recommended the term of office
     alternate is not received by the Secretary              processed and new member selections                   start date be changed to August 1.
     on or before February 20, the Secretary                 to be made prior to the new term of                      For the reasons stated above, it is
     may select, without nomination, such                    office. The proposed changes would                    proposed that § 981.32, Nominations, be
     member or alternate from persons                        provide 60 days between the April 1                   amended by changing the nomination
     belonging to the group to be                            and June 1 nomination process deadline                deadline for Board nominees from
     represented.                                            dates, compared to the existing 30 days               January 20 to April 1 and the deadline
        Section 981.33 provides that the term                between the current dates of January 20               for presenting nominees for selection to
     of office of Board members and alternate                and February 20. The proposed changes                 the Secretary from February 20 to June
     members selected by the Secretary                       would also provide 60 days between the                1. Further, it is proposed that § 981.33,
     pursuant to § 981.32 shall begin on                     June 1 deadline for the Board to submit               Selection and term of office, be
     March 1.                                                the nominations to USDA and the new                   amended by changing the start of the
        This proposal would amend § 981.32                   August 1 term of office start date,                   term of office from March 1 to August
     by changing the nomination deadline                     compared to the existing 10 days                      1 and by making a clarifying change to
     for Board nominees from January 20 to                   between the current dates of February                 remove language related to a previous
     April 1 and the deadline for presenting                 20 and March 1. Extending the times                   amendment to the Order that is no
     nominees for selection to the Secretary                 between these dates would improve the                 longer needed.
     from February 20 to June 1. It would                    overall preparation and processing of                 Proposal 2—Regulation Authority for
     also amend § 981.33 by changing the                     nominations.                                          Nomination Methods
     start of the term of office from March 1                   The proposal to change the term of
     to August 1. A clarifying change would                  office start date would improve Board                   Section 981.32 provides the methods
     also be made to § 981.33 to remove                      cohesiveness because the Board would                  by which nominations for open Board
     language related to a previous                          then operate on the same timeline as the              member and alternate member positions
     amendment to the Order that is no                       crop year and the Board’s committees.                 shall be chosen, including the dates by
     longer needed.                                          The Order’s crop year is defined in                   which (1) ballots and voting information
        Changing the two nomination process                  § 981.19 as August 1 through July 31.                 shall be mailed by the Board to all
     dates from January 20 and February 20                   The Board is responsible for all program              handlers and growers, other than
     to April 1 and June 1, respectively,                    planning and budgeting for each crop                  cooperative(s) of record, and (2)
     could provide several benefits. First,                  year. However, with the current term of               nominations shall be submitted by the
     preparing ballots to mail in January is                 office beginning on March 1, Board                    Board to the Secretary. Changes to these
     very challenging for the Board because                  members responsible for annual                        dates are included in Proposal 1 above.


VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:15 Nov 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM   14NOP1


     56744             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules

        This proposal would change § 981.32                  Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis                    To estimate the proportion of almond
     by adding authority to modify the                                                                             handlers that would be considered
                                                                Pursuant to the requirements set forth             small businesses, it was assumed that
     nomination methods described in
                                                             in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)               the unit value per shelled pound of
     paragraph (a) through the future
                                                             (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered                almonds exported in a particular year
     development of regulations using the                    the economic impact of this action on
     informal rulemaking process. Currently,                                                                       could serve as a representative almond
                                                             small entities. Accordingly, AMS has                  price at the handler level. A unit value
     changes to the nomination methods                       prepared this final regulatory flexibility
     require formal rulemaking. The Board                                                                          for a commodity is the value of exports
                                                             analysis.                                             divided by the quantity. Data from
     would still be required to discuss future
                                                                The purpose of the RFA is to fit                   USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service
     proposed changes at its meetings and to
                                                             regulatory actions to the scale of                    showed that the value of almond
     vote on whether to recommend changes
                                                             businesses subject to such actions in                 exports from August 2016 to July 2017
     to USDA. If amended, future changes                     order that small businesses will not be
     would still require notice be given to the                                                                    (combining shelled and inshell
                                                             unduly or disproportionately burdened.                almonds) was $4.072 billion. The
     public with an opportunity for the                      Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
     public to comment on the proposed                                                                             quantity of almond exports over that
                                                             Act, and rules issued thereunder, are                 period was 1.406 billion pounds,
     changes. However, it is anticipated that                unique in that they are brought about                 combining shelled exports and the
     this proposed amendment would                           through group action of essentially                   shelled equivalent of inshell exports.
     streamline future changes to the Order                  small entities acting on their own                    Dividing the export value by the
     by allowing such changes to be                          behalf.                                               quantity yields a unit value of $2.90 per
     proposed and finalized using informal                      There are approximately 6,800                      pound. Subtracting this figure from the
     rulemaking.                                             almond growers in the production area                 NASS 2016 estimate of season average
        For the reasons stated above, it is                  and approximately 100 almond handlers                 grower price per pound ($2.44) yields
     proposed that § 981.32, Nominations, be                 subject to regulation under the Order.                $0.46 per pound as a representative
     amended by adding a new paragraph                       Small agricultural service firms are                  grower-handler margin. Applying the
     that would provide the Board with                       defined by the Small Business                         $2.90 representative handler price per
     authority to modify its nomination                      Administration (SBA) as those having                  pound to 2016–17 handler shipment
     methods by developing regulations                       annual receipts of less than $7,500,000,              quantities provided by the Board
     using the informal rulemaking process.                  and small agricultural producers are                  showed that approximately 40 percent
                                                             defined as those having annual receipts               of California’s almond handlers shipped
     Proposal 3—Regulation Authority for                     of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).               almonds valued under $7,500,000
     Term of Office Start Date                                                                                     during the 2016–17 crop year and
                                                                The National Agricultural Statistics
                                                             Service (NASS) reported in its 2012                   would therefore be considered small
        Section 981.33 provides that the term
                                                             Agricultural Census that there were                   entities according to the SBA definition.
     of office of Board members and alternate                                                                         The proposed amendments would
     members selected by the Secretary                       6,841 almond farms in the production
                                                             area (California), of which 6,204 had                 change the dates associated with the
     pursuant to § 981.32 shall begin on                                                                           process to nominate Board members and
     March 1. A change to this term of office                bearing acres. The following
                                                             computation provides an estimate of the               alternates as well as the start of the term
     start date is included in Proposal 1.                                                                         of office of Board members. The
                                                             proportion of agricultural producers
        This proposal would change § 981.33                  (farms) and agricultural service firms                proposed amendments would also add
     by adding authority to modify the term                  (handlers) that would be considered                   authority to allow future revisions of the
     of office start date through the future                 small under the SBA definitions.                      nomination methods and term of office
     development of regulations using the                                                                          dates through the development of
                                                                The NASS Census data indicates that                regulations using informal rulemaking.
     informal rulemaking process. Currently,                 out of the 6,204 California farms with
     changes to the term of office start date                                                                      These amendments would improve the
                                                             bearing acres of almonds, 4,471 (72                   nomination process, align the term of
     require formal rulemaking. The Board                    percent) have fewer than 100 bearing
     would still be required to discuss a                                                                          office with the crop year and
                                                             acres.                                                appointment of Board committees, and
     future proposed change at its meetings
                                                                For the almond industry’s most                     streamline the process for making
     and to vote on whether to recommend
                                                             recently reported crop year (2016),                   similar changes in the future.
     a change to USDA. If amended, a future
                                                             NASS reported an average yield of 2,280                  The Board’s proposed amendments
     change to the term of office start date
                                                             pounds per acre and a season average                  were unanimously recommended at a
     would still require notice be given to the
                                                             grower price of $2.44 per pound. A 100-               public meeting of the Board on
     public with an opportunity for the
                                                             acre farm with an average yield of 2,280              December 4, 2017. The proposed
     public to comment on the proposed                       pounds per acre would produce about
     change. However, it is anticipated that                                                                       amendments are administrative in
                                                             228,000 pounds of almonds. At $2.44                   nature; therefore, if any or all the
     this proposed amendment would                           per pound, that farm’s production                     proposals are approved in referendum,
     streamline future changes to the Order                  would be valued at $556,320. The                      there should be no economic impact on
     by allowing such changes to be                          Census of Agriculture indicates that the              growers or handlers. Changing the
     proposed and finalized using informal                   majority of California’s almond farms                 nomination dates could encourage
     rulemaking.                                             are smaller than 100 acres; therefore, it             greater industry participation on the
        For the reasons stated above, it is                  could be concluded that the majority of               Board because the timing of the current
     proposed that § 981.33, Selection and                   growers had annual receipts from the                  nominations occurs immediately after
     term of office, be amended by adding a                  sale of almonds in 2016–17 of less than               the winter holiday season, when many
     new paragraph that would provide the                    $556,320, which is below the SBA                      industry members are just returning to
     Board with authority to modify the term                 threshold of $750,000. Thus, over 70                  their operations and may be less
     of office start date by developing                      percent of California’s almond growers                inclined to participate. The changes to
     regulations using the informal                          would be classified as small entities                 the nomination process dates and the
     rulemaking process.                                     according to SBA’s definition.                        term of office start date are expected to


VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:15 Nov 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM   14NOP1


                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                                   56745

     streamline and improve operations of                    Register. A 60-day comment period                     Order Amending the Order Regulating
     the Board. Adding authority to allow the                ending September 4, 2018, was                         the Handling of Almonds Grown in
     development of regulations through                      provided to allow interested persons to               California 1
     informal rulemaking for making future                   respond to the proposal. One comment                  Findings and Determinations
     changes to the nomination methods and                   was received, but it did not pertain to
     term of office start date could reduce the                                                                       The findings hereinafter set forth are
                                                             this proposal; therefore, no changes
     time it takes to implement the changes,                                                                       supplementary to the findings and
                                                             were made to the proposed
     thereby allowing the Board to function                                                                        determinations which were previously
                                                             amendments.                                           made in connection with the issuance of
     more effectively.
        Alternatives to the proposals,                         A small business guide on complying                 the marketing order; and all said
     including recommending no changes,                      with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop             previous findings and determinations
     were considered. However, the Board                     marketing agreements and orders may                   are hereby ratified and affirmed, except
     believes that changing the nomination                   be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.                   insofar as such findings and
     process dates and term of office start                  gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-                      determinations may be in conflict with
     date, as well as adding authority to                    businesses. Any questions about the                   the findings and determinations set
     make similar changes in the future by                   compliance guide should be sent to                    forth herein.
     creating regulations through informal                   Richard Lower at the previously                          1. The Order, as amended, and as
     rulemaking, will be beneficial to the                   mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER                  hereby proposed to be further amended,
     industry by enhancing Board operations                  INFORMATION CONTACT section.                          and all of the terms and conditions
     and effectiveness.                                                                                            thereof, would tend to effectuate the
                                                             Findings and Conclusions                              declared policy of the Act;
     Paperwork Reduction Act                                                                                          2. The Order, as amended, and as
       In accordance with the Paperwork                        The findings and conclusions and                    hereby proposed to be further amended,
     Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.                        general findings and determinations                   regulates the handling of almonds
     Chapter 35), the Order’s information                    included in the proposed rule set forth               grown in California in the same manner
     collection requirements have been                       in the July 6, 2018, issue of the Federal             as, and are applicable only to, persons
     previously approved by OMB and                          Register are hereby approved and                      in the respective classes of commercial
     assigned OMB No. 0581–0178                              adopted.                                              and industrial activity specified in the
     (Vegetable and Specialty Crops). No                                                                           Order;
                                                             Marketing Order                                          3. The Order, as amended, and as
     changes in those requirements because
     of this action would be necessary.                        Annexed hereto and made a part                      hereby proposed to be further amended,
     Should any changes become necessary,                    hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order               is limited in application to the smallest
     they would be submitted to OMB for                      Amending the Order Regulating the                     regional production area which is
     approval.                                               Handling of Almonds Grown in                          practicable, consistent with carrying out
       As with all Federal marketing order                                                                         the declared policy of the Act, and the
                                                             California.’’ This document has been
     programs, reports and forms are                                                                               issuance of several orders applicable to
                                                             decided upon as the detailed and
     periodically reviewed to reduce                                                                               subdivisions of the production area
     information requirements and                            appropriate means of effectuating the
                                                                                                                   would not effectively carry out the
     duplication by industry and public                      foregoing findings and conclusions. It is             declared policy of the Act;
     sector agencies. In addition, USDA has                  hereby ordered that this entire rule be                  4. The Order, as amended, and as
     not identified any relevant Federal rules               published in the Federal Register.                    hereby proposed to be further amended,
     that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with               Referendum Order                                      prescribe, insofar as practicable, such
     this rule.                                                                                                    different terms applicable to different
       AMS is committed to complying with                      It is hereby directed that a grower                 parts of the production area as are
     the E-Government Act, to promote the                    referendum be conducted in accordance                 necessary to give due recognition to the
     use of the internet and other                           with the procedure for the conduct of                 differences in the production and
     information technologies to provide                     referenda (7 CFR 900.400–407) to                      marketing of almonds produced in the
     increased opportunities for citizen                     determine whether the annexed order                   production area; and
     access to Government information and                    amending the Order regulating the                        5. All handling of almonds produced
     services, and for other purposes.                       handling of almonds grown in                          in the production area as defined in the
       The Board’s meeting was widely                        California is approved by growers who                 Order is in the current of interstate or
     publicized throughout the almond                                                                              foreign commerce or directly burdens,
                                                             have engaged in the production of
     industry. All interested persons were                                                                         obstructs, or affects such commerce.
                                                             almonds within the production area
     invited to attend the meeting and
                                                             during the representative period. The                 Order Relative to Handling
     encouraged to participate in Board
     deliberations on all issues. Like all                   representative period for the conduct of                 It is therefore ordered, that on and
     Board meetings, the December 4, 2017,                   such referendum is hereby determined                  after the effective date hereof, all
     meeting was public, and all entities,                   to be August 1, 2017, to July 31, 2018.               handling of almonds grown in
     both large and small, were encouraged                     The agents of the Secretary to conduct              California shall be in conformity to, and
     to express their views on these                         such referendum are designated to be                  in compliance with, the terms and
     proposals.                                              Peter Sommers and Terry Vawter,                       conditions of the said order as hereby
       A proposed rule concerning this                       California Marketing Field Office,                    proposed to be amended as follows:
     action was published in the Federal                     Marketing Order and Agreement                            The provisions of the proposed
     Register on July 6, 2018 (83 FR 31473).                 Division, Specialty Crops Program,                    marketing order amending the Order
     Copies of the proposed rule were sent                   AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–                        1 This order shall not become effective unless and
     via email to all Board members and                      5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:                  until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
     almond handlers. Finally, the rule was                  PeterR.Sommers@usda.gov or                            practice and procedure governing proceedings to
     made available through the internet by                  Terry.Vawter@usda.gov., respectively.                 formulate marketing agreements and marketing
     USDA and the Office of the Federal                                                                            orders have been met.



VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:15 Nov 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00004   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM   14NOP1


     56746             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules

     contained in the proposed rule issued                   circulation in the almond producing                   acknowledges, a combined metric
     by the Administrator on July 2, 2018,                   areas.                                                would necessitate a translation of the
     and published in the Federal Register                   *      *    *     *    *                              existing energy conservation standards
     (83 FR 31473) on July 6, 2018, will be                     (3) The Board may recommend,                       applicable to residential furnaces using
     and are the terms and provisions of this                subject to the approval of the Secretary,             an appropriate crosswalk. Through this
     order amending the Order and are set                    a change to the nomination method,                    announcement, DOE seeks comment on
     forth in full herein.                                   should the Board determine that a                     the petition, as well as any data or
                                                             revision is necessary.                                information that could be used in DOE’s
     List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
                                                             *      *    *     *    *                              determination whether to proceed with
       Almonds, Marketing agreements,                        ■ 3. Amend § 981.33 by revising the first             the petition.
     Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping                       sentence of paragraphs (a) and (b),                   DATES: Written comments and
     requirements.                                           revising the last sentence of paragraph               information are requested on or before
       Dated: November 7, 2018.                              (c), and adding paragraph (d) to read as              January 14, 2019.
     Bruce Summers,
                                                             follows:                                              ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
                                                                                                                   encouraged to submit comments,
     Administrator, Agricultural Marketing                   § 981.33    Selection and term of office.
     Service.                                                                                                      identified by ‘‘Test Procedure for
                                                                (a) Members and their respective                   Consumer Warm Air Furnaces Petition,’’
       For the reasons discussed in the                      alternates for positions open on the                  by any of the following methods:
     Preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to                 Board shall be selected by the Secretary                Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
     be amended as follows.                                  from persons nominated pursuant to                    www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                             § 981.32, or, at the discretion of the                instructions for submitting comments.
     PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN                               Secretary, from other qualified persons,                Email: ResFurnPet2018PET0017@
     CALIFORNIA                                              for a term of office beginning August 1.              ee.doe.gov. Include Docket No. EERE–
                                                             * * *                                                 2018–BT–PET–0017 in the subject line
     ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR                      (b) The term of office of members of               of the message.
     part 981 continues to read as follows:                  the Board shall be for a period of three                Postal Mail: Appliance and
         Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.                        years beginning on August 1 of the years              Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
                                                             selected except where otherwise                       Department of Energy, Building
     ■ 2. Amend § 981.32 by revising                         provided. * * *                                       Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
     paragraph (a)(1) and adding paragraph                      (c) * * * This limitation on tenure                1000 Independence Avenue SW,
     (a)(3) to read as follows:                              shall not apply to alternate members.                 Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
                                                                (d) The Board may recommend,                       possible, please submit all items on a
     § 981.32   Nominations.                                 subject to approval of the Secretary,                 compact disc (CD), in which case it is
        (a) Method. (1) Each year the terms of               revisions to the start date for the term              not necessary to include printed copies.
     office of three of the members elected                  of office of members of the Board.                      Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance
     pursuant to § 981.31(a) and (b) shall                   [FR Doc. 2018–24727 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]          and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
     expire, except every third year when the                BILLING CODE 3410–02–P                                Department of Energy, Building
     term of office for two of those members                                                                       Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza
     shall expire. Nominees for each                                                                               SW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024.
     respective member and alternate                         DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY                                  Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
     member shall be chosen by ballot                                                                              please submit all items on a CD, in
     delivered to the Board. Nominees                        10 CFR Part 430                                       which case it is not necessary to include
     chosen by the Board in this manner                                                                            printed copies.
     shall be submitted by the Board to the                  Energy Conservation Program: Test                       Docket: For access to the docket to
     Secretary on or before June 1 of each                   Procedures for Consumer Warm Air                      read background documents, or
     year together with such information as                  Furnaces, Notice of Petition for                      comments received, go to the Federal
     the Secretary may require. If a                         Rulemaking                                            eRulemaking Portal at: http://
     nomination for any Board member or                      AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and               www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-
     alternate is not received by the Secretary              Renewable Energy, Department of                       2018-BT-PET-0017.
     on or before June 1, the Secretary may                  Energy.                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
     select such member or alternate from                    ACTION: Notice of petition for                        Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy,
     persons belonging to the group to be                    rulemaking; request for comment.                      Office of the General Counsel, 1000
     represented without nomination. The                                                                           Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
     Board shall mail to all handlers and                    SUMMARY:   On October 12, 2018, the                   DC 20585. Telephone: (202) 586–9507.
     growers, other than the cooperative(s) of               Department of Energy (DOE) received a                 Email: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
     record, the required ballots with all                   petition from the Air-Conditioning,                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
     necessary voting information including                  Heating, and Refrigeration Institute                  Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
     the names of incumbents willing to                      (AHRI) asking DOE to initiate notice-                 U.S.C. 551 et seq., provides among other
     accept renomination, and, to such                       and-comment rulemaking to develop a                   things, that ‘‘[e]ach agency shall give an
     growers, the name of any person                         new, unified test procedure for                       interested person the right to petition
     proposed for nomination in a petition                   residential furnaces which would                      for the issuance, amendment, or repeal
     signed by at least 15 such growers and                  replace the three currently required                  of a rule.’’ (5 U.S.C. 553(e)) DOE
     filed with the Board on or before April                 performance metrics (i.e., annual fuel                received a petition from AHRI, as
     1. Distribution of ballots shall be                     utilization efficiency (AFUE), fan                    described in this notice and set forth
     announced by press release, furnishing                  efficiency ratio (FER), and standby                   verbatim below,1 requesting that DOE
     pertinent information on balloting,                     mode/off mode energy consumption
     issued by the Board through newspapers                  (PW,SB and PW,OFF)) with a single new                    1 Attachments and data submitted by AHRI with

     and other publications having general                   metric (AFUE2). As the petition                       its petition for rulemaking are available in the



VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:15 Nov 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM   14NOP1



Document Created: 2018-11-14 03:31:32
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 03:31:32
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule and referendum order.
DatesThe referendum will be conducted from March 25, 2019, through April 5, 2019. The representative period for the referendum is August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2018.
ContactDebbie Wray, Senior Marketing Specialist, or Michelle Sharrow, Deputy Director, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 56742 
CFR AssociatedAlmonds; Marketing Agreements; Nuts and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR