83 FR 56811 - Large Diameter Welded Pipe From India: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; 2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 56811-56813 | |
| FR Document | 2018-24806 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 56811-56813] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-24806] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-881] Large Diameter Welded Pipe From India: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; 2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of large diameter welded pipe from India are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017 DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Johnson at (202) 482-4929 or Jaron Moore at (202) 482-3640, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 27, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of large diameter welded pipe from India and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ We received comments from the petitioners,\2\ agreeing with our affirmative preliminary determination to apply total adverse facts available (AFA) to the non-responsive companies.\3\ No other interested party submitted comments. Accordingly, we made no changes to the Preliminary Determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 43653 (August 27, 2018) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ The petitioners are American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Berg Spiral Pipe Corp., Dura-Bond Industries, and Stupp Corporation, individually and as members of American Line Pipe Producers Association; Greens Bayou Pipe Mill, LP; JSW Steel (USA) Inc.; Skyline Steel; and Trinity Products LLC. \3\ See Petitioners Letter, ``Case Brief of Petitioners,'' dated September 26, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigation The period of investigation is January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is large diameter welded pipe from India. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' at the Appendix to this notice. Scope Comments During the course of this investigation and the concurrent LTFV investigations of large diameter welded pipe from Canada, Greece, Korea, the People's Republic of China (China) and Turkey, and the concurrent countervailing duty investigations of large diameter welded pipe from China, India, Korea and Turkey, Commerce received scope comments from interested parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum \4\ to address these comments. In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce set aside a period of time for parties to address scope issues in scope case and rebuttal briefs. No interested parties submitted scope comments in scope case or scope rebuttal briefs. Therefore, for this final determination, the scope of this investigation remains unchanged from that published in the Preliminary Determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum, ``Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,'' dated June 19, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Use of Adverse Facts Available The mandatory respondents Bhushan Steel (Bhushan) and Welspun Trading Limited (Welspun) failed to participate in this investigation.\5\ Therefore, in the Preliminary Determination, pursuant to sections 776(a)(1), 776(a)(2)(A)-(C), and 776(b) of the Act, we determined for Bhushan and Welspun an estimated dumping rate based on AFA. No parties filed comments in opposition to our Preliminary Determination with respect to Bhushan and Welspun and there are no comments or information on the record that would cause us to revisit our preliminary AFA determinations. Accordingly, we continue to find that the application of AFA pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act is warranted with respect to Bhushan and Welspun. In applying total AFA, we have determined for Bhushan's and Welspun's exports of the subject merchandise an estimated dumping margin of 50.55 percent, which is the only dumping margin alleged in the Petition \6\ and which has been corroborated to the extent practicable [[Page 56812]] within the meaning of section 776(c) of the Act.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Determination Memorandum at 4-8. \6\ See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, Greece, India, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey, dated January 17, 2018 (Petition). \7\ See Preliminary Determination Memorandum at 7-8. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate As discussed in the Preliminary Determination, Commerce based the ``All-Others'' rate on the only dumping margin alleged in the Petition,\8\ in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. We made no changes to the selection of this rate for this final determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Petition; see also Preliminary Determination Memorandum at 8-9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The final estimated dumping margins are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash deposit rate (adjusted Dumping margin for export Exporter/producer (percent) subsidies offset) (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bhushan Steel........................... 50.55 16.85 Welspun Trading Limited................. 50.55 16.85 All-Others.............................. 50.55 16.85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, for this final determination, we will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of large diameter welded pipe from India, as described in the Appendix to this notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 27, the date of publication in the Federal Register of the affirmative Preliminary Determination. Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise equal to the estimated dumping margin, as follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated dumping margin determined in this final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent identified above but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated weighted- average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will be equal to the estimated dumping margin for all other producers or exporters. These suspension-of-liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Commerce normally adjusts the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export subsidies countervailed in a companion countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding, when CVD provisional measures are in effect. Accordingly, where Commerce has made a final affirmative determination for countervailable export subsidies,\9\ Commerce offsets the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the appropriate CVD rate. Any such adjusted rates may be found in the ``Final Determination'' section, above. However, provisional measures expired in the companion countervailing duty investigation on October 26, 2018. Accordingly, we will direct CBP to collect the estimated antidumping cash deposits unadjusted for countervailed export subsidies. In the event of an affirmative determination by the International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce will issue antidumping and countervailing duty orders and direct CBP to collect the cash deposit rate, as adjusted for export subsidies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See the unpublished Federal Register notice, Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure The dumping margins assigned to the mandatory respondents in this investigation are based on AFA. As these margins are based on the dumping margin alleged in the Petition, and because we made no changes to the Preliminary Determination, there are no calculations to disclose for this final determination. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify ITC of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of large diameter welded pipe, no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash deposits posted will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, [[Page 56813]] is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: November 5, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal outside diameter (large diameter welded pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, grade, end finish, or stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be used for structural purposes, including, but not limited to, piling. Specifically, not included is large diameter welded pipe produced only to specifications of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) for water and sewage pipe. Large diameter welded pipe used to transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is normally produced to the American Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. Large diameter welded pipe may also be produced to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, or A53, or other relevant domestic specifications, grades and/or standards. Large diameter welded pipe can be produced to comparable foreign specifications, grades and/or standards or to proprietary specifications, grades and/or standards, or can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the physical description set forth above is covered by the scope of this investigation, whether or not produced according to a particular standard. Subject merchandise also includes large diameter welded pipe that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to coating, painting, notching, beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter welded pipe. The large diameter welded pipe that is subject to this investigation is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060, 7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010, 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2018-24806 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56811
contain the following information: (1) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ at the
The party’s name, address, and Appendix to this notice.
telephone number; (2) the number of International Trade Administration
Scope Comments
participants; and (3) a list of the issues [A–533–881]
to be discussed. Oral presentations at During the course of this investigation
the hearing will be limited to issues Large Diameter Welded Pipe From and the concurrent LTFV investigations
raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If India: Final Determination of Sales at of large diameter welded pipe from
a request for a hearing is made, parties Less Than Fair Value; 2017 Canada, Greece, Korea, the People’s
will be notified of the time and date for AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Republic of China (China) and Turkey,
the hearing to be held at the U.S. International Trade Administration, and the concurrent countervailing duty
Department of Commerce, 1401 Department of Commerce. investigations of large diameter welded
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce pipe from China, India, Korea and
DC 20230.37 (Commerce) determines that imports of Turkey, Commerce received scope
All submissions, with limited large diameter welded pipe from India comments from interested parties.
exceptions, must be filed electronically are being, or are likely to be, sold in the Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope
United States at less than fair value Decision Memorandum 4 to address
using Enforcement and Compliance’s
(LTFV) for the period of investigation these comments. In the Preliminary
AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
January 1, 2017, through December 31, Determination, Commerce set aside a
Service System (ACCESS).38 ACCESS is
2017 period of time for parties to address
available to registered users at http://
DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. scope issues in scope case and rebuttal
access.trade.gov and in the Central briefs. No interested parties submitted
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
scope comments in scope case or scope
Department of Commerce building. An Johnson at (202) 482–4929 or Jaron
Moore at (202) 482–3640, AD/CVD rebuttal briefs. Therefore, for this final
electronically filed document must be determination, the scope of this
received successfully in its entirety by Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade investigation remains unchanged from
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) that published in the Preliminary
on the due date. Documents excepted Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Determination.
from the electronic submission
requirements must be filed manually NW, Washington, DC 20230. Use of Adverse Facts Available
(i.e., in paper form) with the APO/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The mandatory respondents Bhushan
Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and Background Steel (Bhushan) and Welspun Trading
stamped with the date and time of Limited (Welspun) failed to participate
On August 27, 2018, Commerce
receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.39 published in the Federal Register the in this investigation.5 Therefore, in the
Commerce will issue the final results Preliminary Determination of sales at Preliminary Determination, pursuant to
of these changed circumstances reviews, LTFV of large diameter welded pipe sections 776(a)(1), 776(a)(2)(A)–(C), and
which will include its analysis of any from India and invited interested parties 776(b) of the Act, we determined for
written comments, no later than 270 to comment.1 We received comments Bhushan and Welspun an estimated
days after the date on which this review from the petitioners,2 agreeing with our dumping rate based on AFA. No parties
was initiated. affirmative preliminary determination to filed comments in opposition to our
The current requirement for cash apply total adverse facts available (AFA) Preliminary Determination with respect
to the non-responsive companies.3 No to Bhushan and Welspun and there are
deposits of estimated antidumping and
other interested party submitted no comments or information on the
countervailing duties on all entries of
comments. Accordingly, we made no record that would cause us to revisit our
subject merchandise will continue
changes to the Preliminary preliminary AFA determinations.
unless until they are modified pursuant Determination. Accordingly, we continue to find that
to the final results of these changed the application of AFA pursuant to
circumstances reviews. Period of Investigation
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act is
This notice is published in The period of investigation is January warranted with respect to Bhushan and
accordance with sections 751(b) and 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Welspun. In applying total AFA, we
777(i) of the Act. Scope of the Investigation have determined for Bhushan’s and
Dated: November 5, 2018. Welspun’s exports of the subject
The product covered by this merchandise an estimated dumping
Gary Taverman, investigation is large diameter welded margin of 50.55 percent, which is the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping pipe from India. For a full description only dumping margin alleged in the
and Countervailing Duty Operations, of the scope of this investigation, see the Petition 6 and which has been
performing the non-exclusive functions and
corroborated to the extent practicable
duties of the Assistant Secretary for 1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India:
Enforcement and Compliance Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 83 FR 43653 (August 27, 2018) 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Scope Comments Decision
[FR Doc. 2018–24798 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Preliminary Decision Memorandum. dated June 19, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision
2 The petitioners are American Cast Iron Pipe Memorandum).
Company, Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Berg Spiral Pipe 5 See Preliminary Determination Memorandum at
37 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Corp., Dura-Bond Industries, and Stupp 4–8.
38 See
Corporation, individually and as members of 6 See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping
generally 19 CFR 351.303. American Line Pipe Producers Association; Greens and Countervailing Duties: Large Diameter Welded
39 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Bayou Pipe Mill, LP; JSW Steel (USA) Inc.; Skyline Pipe from Canada, Greece, India, the People’s
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Steel; and Trinity Products LLC. Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 3 See Petitioners Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Republic of Turkey, dated January 17, 2018
39263 (July 6, 2011). Petitioners,’’ dated September 26, 2018. (Petition).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57031/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56813
is hereby requested. Failure to comply purposes, the written description of the Scope of the Order
with the regulations and terms of an scope of this investigation is dispositive.
The merchandise covered by the order
APO is a sanctionable violation. [FR Doc. 2018–24806 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am] is certain hot-rolled steel flat products.
Notification to Interested Parties BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P For a complete description of the scope
of the order, see the Preliminary
This determination is issued and
Decision Memorandum.2
published in accordance with sections DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Methodology
CFR 351.210(c). International Trade Administration Commerce is conducting this review
Dated: November 5, 2018. in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Gary Taverman, [A–588–874] Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Export price and constructed export
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products price are calculated in accordance with
performing the non-exclusive functions and From Japan: Preliminary Results of section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated
duties of the Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Duty Administrative in accordance with section 773 of the
Enforcement and Compliance. Review and Preliminary Determination Act.
of No Shipments; 2016–2017 For a full description of the
Appendix
methodology underlying our
Scope of the Investigation AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
conclusions, see the Preliminary
International Trade Administration,
The merchandise covered by this Decision Memorandum. The
Department of Commerce.
investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce public document and is on file
than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal (Commerce) preliminarily determines electronically via Enforcement and
outside diameter (large diameter welded that Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Compliance’s Antidumping and
pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, Corporation (Nippon Steel) and Tokyo
surface finish, grade, end finish, or
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Tokyo Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may
be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or
Steel), the two companies selected for ACCESS is available to registered users
other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be individual examination, sold subject at http://access.trade.gov, and to all
used for structural purposes, including, but merchandise in the United States at parties in the Central Records Unit,
not limited to, piling. Specifically, not prices below normal value during the Room B8024 of the main Department of
included is large diameter welded pipe period of review (POR). Additionally, Commerce building. In addition, a
produced only to specifications of the Commerce preliminarily determines complete version of the Preliminary
American Water Works Association (AWWA) that three other companies for which we Decision Memorandum can be accessed
for water and sewage pipe. initiated reviews had no shipments
Large diameter welded pipe used to directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is
during the POR. We invite interested frn/. The signed and electronic versions
normally produced to the American parties to comment on these preliminary of the Preliminary Decision
Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. results. Memorandum are identical in content.
Large diameter welded pipe may also be DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. A list of the topics discussed in the
produced to American Society for Testing Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, attached as the Appendix to this notice.
or A53, or other relevant domestic Myrna Lobo or Jack Zhao, AD/CVD
specifications, grades and/or standards. Large Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Preliminary Determination of No
diameter welded pipe can be produced to Compliance, International Trade Shipments
comparable foreign specifications, grades Administration, U.S. Department of
and/or standards or to proprietary Among the companies under review,
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
specifications, grades and/or standards, or four companies, Hitachi Metals, Ltd.
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting (Hitachi), Honda Trading Canada, Inc.
(202) 482–2371 or (202) 482–1396,
the physical description set forth above is (Honda), Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (Mitsui), and
respectively.
covered by the scope of this investigation, Panasonic Corporation (Panasonic)
whether or not produced according to a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: properly filed statements reporting that
particular standard. they made no shipments of subject
Subject merchandise also includes large Background
merchandise to the United States during
diameter welded pipe that has been further
Commerce is conducting an the POR. Based on the certifications
processed in a third country, including but
not limited to coating, painting, notching, administrative review of the submitted and our analysis of Customs
beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any antidumping duty order on certain hot- and Border Protection (CBP)
other processing that would not otherwise rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled information, we preliminarily determine
remove the merchandise from the scope of steel) from Japan. The notice of that Hitachi, Honda, and Panasonic had
the investigation if performed in the country initiation of this administrative review no shipments during the POR.3
of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter was published on December 7, 2017.1
welded pipe. This review covers 20 producers and 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
The large diameter welded pipe that is exporters of the subject merchandise. the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
subject to this investigation is currently Administrative Review and Preliminary
The POR is March 22, 2016, through Determination of No Shipments: Certain Hot-Rolled
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under September 30, 2017. Commerce selected Steel Flat Products from Japan; 2016–2017,’’ dated
subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, two mandatory respondents for concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
individual examination: Nippon Steel notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 3 See Hitachi Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060, and Tokyo Steel.
Administrative Review of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010, Flat Products: Hitachi No Shipment Letter,’’ dated
7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and December 18, 2017; see also Honda Letter,
7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR ‘‘Administrative Review of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
are provided for convenience and customs 57705 (December 7, 2017). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57031/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 03:32:38
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 03:32:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable November 14, 2018. | |
| Contact | Kate Johnson at (202) 482-4929 or Jaron Moore at (202) 482-3640, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 56811 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR