83 FR 56819 - Large Diameter Welded Pipe From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 56819-56821 | |
| FR Document | 2018-24804 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 56819-56821] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-24804] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-882] Large Diameter Welded Pipe From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of large diameter welded pipe welded pipe from India. DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Palmer at (202) 482-9068 or Suzanne Lam at (202) 482-0783, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 29, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register its affirmative Preliminary Determination of this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum issued concurrently with this notice.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 83 FR 30690 (June 29, 2018) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigation The period of investigation is January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is large diameter welded pipe from India. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation'' in Appendix I of this notice. Scope Comments During the course of this investigation and the concurrent LTFV investigations [[Page 56820]] of large diameter welded pipe from Canada, Greece, Korea, the People's Republic of China (China) and Turkey, and the concurrent countervailing duty investigations of large diameter welded pipe from China, India, Korea and Turkey, Commerce received scope comments from interested parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum \3\ to address these comments. In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce set aside a period of time for parties to address scope issues in scope case and rebuttal briefs.\4\ No interested parties submitted scope comments in scope case or scope rebuttal briefs. Therefore, for this final determination, the scope of this investigation remains unchanged from that published in the Preliminary Determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum, ``Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,'' dated June 19, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). \4\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 43653 (August 27, 2018). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice at Appendix II. Methodology Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, Commerce determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\5\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our final determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In making these findings, Commerce relied, in part, on facts otherwise available and, because it finds that both respondents and the Government of India did not act to the best of their ability to respond to Commerce's requests for information, it drew an adverse inference where appropriate in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\6\ For further information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See sections 776(a), (b), and 782(d) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we calculated an individual rate for each producer/exporter of the subject merchandise individually investigated. In accordance with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for companies not individually investigated, we apply an ``all-others'' rate, which is normally calculated by weighting the subsidy rates of the individual companies selected as mandatory respondents by those companies'' exports of the subject merchandise to the United States. Under section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the all-others rate excludes zero and de minimis rates calculated for the exporters and producers individually investigated, as well as rates based entirely on facts otherwise available. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that if the countervailable subsidy rate established for all exporters and producers individually investigated are zero, de minimis, or determined entirely in accordance with section 776 of the Act, Commerce may use any reasonable method to establish an all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated. In this case, the estimated countervailable subsidy rate calculated for the investigated companies is based entirely on facts available under section 776 of the Act. There is no other information on the record upon which to determine an all-others rate. As a result, we have used the rate assigned to Bhushan Steel and Welspun Trading Limited as the all-others rate. This method is consistent with the Department's past practice.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determiniation, 82 FR 8507, 8508 (January 26, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce determines that the following estimated countervailable subsidy rates exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bhushan Steel........................................... 541.15 Welspun Trading Limited................................. 541.15 All-Others.............................................. 541.15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation As a result of our Preliminary Determination and pursuant to section 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise as described in the scope of the investigation section entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication in the Federal Register. In accordance with section 703(d) of the Act, we issued instructions to CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation for countervailing duty (CVD) purposes for subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after October 27, 2018, but to continue the suspension of liquidation of all entries from June 29, 2018, through October 26, 2018. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final affirmative injury determination, we will issue a CVD order, will reinstate the suspension of liquidation under section 706(a) of the Act, and will require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties for such entries of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above. If the ITC determines that material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all estimated duties deposited or securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be refunded or canceled. Disclosure Normally, Commerce discloses calculations performed for a final determination within five days of its public announcement, or if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, Commerce applied AFA in determining the estimated countervailable subsidy rate for the individually examined companies (Bhushan Steel and Welspun Trading Limited) in this investigation, in accordance with section 776 of the Act. Because our calculation of the AFA subsidy rate is outlined in Appendix I of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, and because we made no changes to the Preliminary Determination, there are no further calculations to disclose. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify the ITC of its determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose [[Page 56821]] such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of large diameter welded pipe from India no later than 45 days after this final determination. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: November 1, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal outside diameter (large diameter welded pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, grade, end finish, or stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be used for structural purposes, including, but not limited to, piling. Specifically, not included is large diameter welded pipe produced only to specifications of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) for water and sewage pipe. Large diameter welded pipe used to transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is normally produced to the American Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. Large diameter welded pipe may also be produced to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, or A53, or other relevant domestic specifications, grades and/or standards. Large diameter welded pipe can be produced to comparable foreign specifications, grades and/or standards or to proprietary specifications, grades and/or standards, or can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the physical description set forth above is covered by the scope of this investigation, whether or not produced according to a particular standard. Subject merchandise also includes large diameter welded pipe that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to coating, painting, notching, beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter welded pipe. The large diameter welded pipe that is subject to this investigation is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060, 7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010, 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences IV. Analysis of Programs V. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Properly Applied AFA in the Preliminary Determination Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find the AAP, DDB, EPCG, and MEIS Programs Countervailable VI. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2018-24804 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56819
administrative review, as provided by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Suzanne Lam at (202) 482–0783, AD/
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The CVD Operations, Office VIII,
cash deposit rate for BlueScope will be International Trade Administration Enforcement and Compliance,
the rate established in the final results International Trade Administration,
of this review; (2) for previously Correction To Notice of Opportunity To U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
reviewed or investigated companies not Request Administrative Review Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
participating in this review, the cash AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, DC 20230.
deposit rate will continue to be the International Trade Administration, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
company-specific rate published for the Department of Commerce. Background
most recently-completed segment of this
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On June 29, 2018, Commerce
proceeding in which the company was
Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD published in the Federal Register its
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, affirmative Preliminary Determination
covered in this review, a prior review,
Enforcement and Compliance, of this countervailing duty (CVD)
or the less-than-fair value (LTFV)
International Trade Administration, investigation and invited interested
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 parties to comment.1 A summary of the
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, events that occurred since Commerce
established for the most recently-
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. published the Preliminary
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of subject SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Determination, as well as a full
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit November 1, 2018, the Department of discussion of the issues raised by parties
rate for all other manufacturers or Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) published its for this final determination, may be
exporters will continue to be 29.58 opportunity to request administrative found in the Issues and Decision
percent, the all-others rate established review of the antidumping duty orders Memorandum issued concurrently with
in the LTFV investigation.13 These cash for November 2018 anniversary cases. this notice.2 The Issues and Decision
deposit requirements, when imposed, Commerce inadvertently stated parties Memorandum is a public document and
shall remain in effect until further may request an administrative review is on file electronically via Enforcement
notice. not later than the last day of October and Compliance’s Antidumping and
2018. The last day to submit a request Countervailing Duty Centralized
Notification to Importers review request for November cases is Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
the last day of November 2018. See ACCESS is available to registered users
This notice serves as a preliminary Antidumping or Countervailing Duty at http://access.trade.gov, and is
reminder to importers of their Order, Finding, or Suspended available to all parties in the Central
responsibility under 19 CFR Investigation; Opportunity to Request Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Administrative Review, 83 FR 54912 Department of Commerce building. In
regarding the reimbursement of (November 1, 2018). This notice serves addition, a complete version of the
antidumping duties prior to liquidation as a correction notice. Issues and Decision Memorandum can
of the relevant entries during this POR. be accessed directly at http://
Failure to comply with this requirement Dated: November 7, 2018.
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
could result in the Secretary’s James Maeder,
and electronic versions of the Issues and
presumption that reimbursement of Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Decision Memorandum are identical in
antidumping duties occurred and the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
content.
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties. Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Period of Investigation
Countervailing Duty Operations.
The preliminary results of review are The period of investigation is January
[FR Doc. 2018–24792 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
issued and published in accordance 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of Scope of the Investigation
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
The product covered by this
Dated: November 1, 2018. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE investigation is large diameter welded
James Maeder, pipe from India. For a full description
International Trade Administration
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for of the scope of this investigation, see the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty [C–533–882] ‘‘Scope of the Investigation’’ in
Operations performing the duties of Deputy Appendix I of this notice.
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Large Diameter Welded Pipe From
Countervailing Duty Operations. India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Scope Comments
Duty Determination During the course of this investigation
Appendix
and the concurrent LTFV investigations
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Decision Memorandum International Trade Administration, 1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India:
I. Summary Department of Commerce. Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Alignment of Final
II. Background SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Determination with Final Antidumping Duty
III. Scope of the Order (Commerce) determines that Determination, 83 FR 30690 (June 29, 2018)
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and countervailable subsidies are being (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
Adverse Inferences provided to producers/exporters of large Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
V. Conclusion diameter welded pipe welded pipe from Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
[FR Doc. 2018–24793 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am] India. Determination of the Countervailing Duty
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. Investigation of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from
India’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: concurrently with this determination and hereby
13 See Antidumping Duty Order. Robert Palmer at (202) 482–9068 or adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57039/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56821
such information, either publicly or and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, and POSCO/POSCO Daewoo Co., Ltd.
under an administrative protective order or A53, or other relevant domestic (collectively POSCO/PDW), the two
(APO), without the written consent of specifications, grades and/or standards. Large companies selected for individual
diameter welded pipe can be produced to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement examination, sold subject merchandise
comparable foreign specifications, grades
and Compliance. Because Commerce’s and/or standards or to proprietary in the United States at prices below
final determination is affirmative, in specifications, grades and/or standards, or normal value during the POR. We invite
accordance with section 705(b) of the can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting interested parties to comment on these
Act, the ITC will make its final the physical description set forth above is preliminary results.
determination as to whether the covered by the scope of this investigation, DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018.
domestic industry in the United States whether or not produced according to a
particular standard. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
is materially injured, or threatened with Benito Ballesteros or Justin Neuman,
material injury, by reason of imports of Subject merchandise also includes large
diameter welded pipe that has been further AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
large diameter welded pipe from India Enforcement and Compliance,
processed in a third country, including but
no later than 45 days after this final not limited to coating, painting, notching, International Trade Administration,
determination. beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Notification Regarding Administrative other processing that would not otherwise Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
Protective Orders remove the merchandise from the scope of DC 20230; telephone: (202) (202) 482–
the investigation if performed in the country
In the event that the ITC issues a final 7425 or (202) 482–0486, respectively.
of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter
negative injury determination, this welded pipe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
notice will serve as the only reminder The large diameter welded pipe that is
subject to this investigation is currently
Background
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff On December 7, 2017, Commerce
destruction of proprietary information Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under initiated the antidumping duty
subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, administrative review on certain hot-
disclosed under APO in accordance 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060,
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060,
written notification of the return/ 7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010,
steel) from the Republic of Korea
destruction of APO materials or 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and (Korea).1 Commerce selected two
conversion to judicial protective order is 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings respondents for individual examination,
hereby requested. Failure to comply are provided for convenience and customs POSCO/PDW and Hyundai Steel
with the regulations and terms of an purposes, the written description of the Company. For a detailed description of
APO is a violation which is subject to scope of this investigation is dispositive. the events that followed the initiation of
sanction. Appendix II this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, dated
Notification to Interested Parties List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and concurrently with these preliminary
This determination is issued and Decision Memorandum results and hereby adopted by this
published pursuant to sections 705(d) I. Summary notice.2
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR II. Background The Preliminary Decision
351.210(c). III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Memorandum is a public document and
Adverse Inferences is on file electronically via Enforcement
Dated: November 1, 2018. IV. Analysis of Programs
Gary Taverman, V. Analysis of Comments
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Comment 1: Whether Commerce Properly Countervailing Duty Centralized
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Applied AFA in the Preliminary Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
performing the non-exclusive functions and Determination Access to ACCESS is available to
duties of the Assistant Secretary for Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should registered users at http://
Enforcement and Compliance. Continue to Find the AAP, DDB, EPCG, access.trade.gov and is available to all
and MEIS Programs Countervailable parties in the Central Records Unit,
Appendix I VI. Conclusion Room B8024 of the main Department of
Scope of the Investigation [FR Doc. 2018–24804 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am] Commerce building. In addition, a
The merchandise covered by this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P complete version of the Preliminary
investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel Decision Memorandum can be accessed
pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more directly on the internet at http://
than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
outside diameter (large diameter welded A list of the topics discussed in the
pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, International Trade Administration
surface finish, grade, end finish, or Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may [A–580–883] attached at the Appendix to this notice.
be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or The signed Preliminary Decision
other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products Memorandum and the electronic
used for structural purposes, including, but From the Republic of Korea: versions of the Preliminary Decision
not limited to, piling. Specifically, not Preliminary Results of Antidumping Memorandum are identical in content.
included is large diameter welded pipe Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
produced only to specifications of the 2017 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
for water and sewage pipe. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 21513 (May 9, 2017).
Large diameter welded pipe used to International Trade Administration, 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is Department of Commerce. the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
normally produced to the American Administrative Review: Certain Cold Rolled Steel
Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2016–
Large diameter welded pipe may also be (Commerce) preliminarily determines 2017,’’ dated October 3, 2018 (Preliminary Decision
produced to American Society for Testing that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57039/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 03:31:48
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 03:31:48
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable November 14, 2018. | |
| Contact | Robert Palmer at (202) 482-9068 or Suzanne Lam at (202) 482-0783, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 56819 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR