83 FR 56821 - Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 220 (November 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 56821-56823 | |
| FR Document | 2018-24796 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 56821-56823] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-24796] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-883] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) and POSCO/POSCO Daewoo Co., Ltd. (collectively POSCO/PDW), the two companies selected for individual examination, sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros or Justin Neuman, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) (202) 482-7425 or (202) 482-0486, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 7, 2017, Commerce initiated the antidumping duty administrative review on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot- rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ Commerce selected two respondents for individual examination, POSCO/PDW and Hyundai Steel Company. For a detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these preliminary results and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 21513 (May 9, 2017). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2016-2017,'' dated October 3, 2018 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached at the Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. [[Page 56822]] Scope of the Order The product covered by this review is hot-rolled steel from Korea. For a full description of the scope see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all- others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we have preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Hyundai and POSCO/PDW that are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, we have preliminarily assigned to the companies not individually examined in this review \3\ a margin of 5.95 percent, which is the weighted average of Hyundai and POSCO/PDW calculated weighted-average dumping margins.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The non-examined companies subject to this review are: Daewoo International Corp., Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd., Marubeni-Itochu Steel Korea, Soon Hong Trading Co., and Sungjin Co. \4\ For more information regarding the calculation of this margin, see Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Margin for Non-Examined Companies,'' dated November 2, 2018. As the weighting factor, we relied on the publicly ranged sales data reported in Hyundai's and POSCO/PDW's quantity and value charts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period March 22, 2016, through September 30, 2017. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ POSCO/POSCO Daewoo Co., Ltd................................. 7.67 Hyundai Steel Company....................................... 3.95 Non-Examined Companies...................................... 5.95 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure, Public Comment, and Opportunity To Request a Hearing We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS \7\ and must be served on interested parties.\8\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \7\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \8\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS. An electronically filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any case or rebuttal briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to each importer and the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 56823]] For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Hyundai and POSCO/PDW for which the producer did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, or for any respondent for which we have a final determination of no shipments, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company (or companies) involved in the transaction.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyundai and POSCO/PDW in the final results of review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or the original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.55 percent,\14\ the all-others rate established in the less-than- fair-value investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 2016) (Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 2, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Methodology Comparison to Normal Value A. Determination of the Comparison Method B. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis Date of Sale Product Comparisons Export Price/Constructed Export Price Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of COP 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices 5. Currency Conversion 6. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-24796 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56821
such information, either publicly or and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, and POSCO/POSCO Daewoo Co., Ltd.
under an administrative protective order or A53, or other relevant domestic (collectively POSCO/PDW), the two
(APO), without the written consent of specifications, grades and/or standards. Large companies selected for individual
diameter welded pipe can be produced to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement examination, sold subject merchandise
comparable foreign specifications, grades
and Compliance. Because Commerce’s and/or standards or to proprietary in the United States at prices below
final determination is affirmative, in specifications, grades and/or standards, or normal value during the POR. We invite
accordance with section 705(b) of the can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting interested parties to comment on these
Act, the ITC will make its final the physical description set forth above is preliminary results.
determination as to whether the covered by the scope of this investigation, DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018.
domestic industry in the United States whether or not produced according to a
particular standard. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
is materially injured, or threatened with Benito Ballesteros or Justin Neuman,
material injury, by reason of imports of Subject merchandise also includes large
diameter welded pipe that has been further AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
large diameter welded pipe from India Enforcement and Compliance,
processed in a third country, including but
no later than 45 days after this final not limited to coating, painting, notching, International Trade Administration,
determination. beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Notification Regarding Administrative other processing that would not otherwise Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
Protective Orders remove the merchandise from the scope of DC 20230; telephone: (202) (202) 482–
the investigation if performed in the country
In the event that the ITC issues a final 7425 or (202) 482–0486, respectively.
of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter
negative injury determination, this welded pipe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
notice will serve as the only reminder The large diameter welded pipe that is
subject to this investigation is currently
Background
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff On December 7, 2017, Commerce
destruction of proprietary information Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under initiated the antidumping duty
subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, administrative review on certain hot-
disclosed under APO in accordance 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060,
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060,
written notification of the return/ 7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010,
steel) from the Republic of Korea
destruction of APO materials or 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and (Korea).1 Commerce selected two
conversion to judicial protective order is 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings respondents for individual examination,
hereby requested. Failure to comply are provided for convenience and customs POSCO/PDW and Hyundai Steel
with the regulations and terms of an purposes, the written description of the Company. For a detailed description of
APO is a violation which is subject to scope of this investigation is dispositive. the events that followed the initiation of
sanction. Appendix II this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, dated
Notification to Interested Parties List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and concurrently with these preliminary
This determination is issued and Decision Memorandum results and hereby adopted by this
published pursuant to sections 705(d) I. Summary notice.2
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR II. Background The Preliminary Decision
351.210(c). III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Memorandum is a public document and
Adverse Inferences is on file electronically via Enforcement
Dated: November 1, 2018. IV. Analysis of Programs
Gary Taverman, V. Analysis of Comments
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Comment 1: Whether Commerce Properly Countervailing Duty Centralized
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Applied AFA in the Preliminary Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
performing the non-exclusive functions and Determination Access to ACCESS is available to
duties of the Assistant Secretary for Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should registered users at http://
Enforcement and Compliance. Continue to Find the AAP, DDB, EPCG, access.trade.gov and is available to all
and MEIS Programs Countervailable parties in the Central Records Unit,
Appendix I VI. Conclusion Room B8024 of the main Department of
Scope of the Investigation [FR Doc. 2018–24804 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am] Commerce building. In addition, a
The merchandise covered by this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P complete version of the Preliminary
investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel Decision Memorandum can be accessed
pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more directly on the internet at http://
than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
outside diameter (large diameter welded A list of the topics discussed in the
pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, International Trade Administration
surface finish, grade, end finish, or Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may [A–580–883] attached at the Appendix to this notice.
be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or The signed Preliminary Decision
other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products Memorandum and the electronic
used for structural purposes, including, but From the Republic of Korea: versions of the Preliminary Decision
not limited to, piling. Specifically, not Preliminary Results of Antidumping Memorandum are identical in content.
included is large diameter welded pipe Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
produced only to specifications of the 2017 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
for water and sewage pipe. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 21513 (May 9, 2017).
Large diameter welded pipe used to International Trade Administration, 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is Department of Commerce. the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
normally produced to the American Administrative Review: Certain Cold Rolled Steel
Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2016–
Large diameter welded pipe may also be (Commerce) preliminarily determines 2017,’’ dated October 3, 2018 (Preliminary Decision
produced to American Society for Testing that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57041/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Notices 56823
For entries of subject merchandise Failure to comply with this requirement DATES: Applicable November 14, 2018.
during the POR produced by Hyundai could result in Commerce’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and POSCO/PDW for which the presumption that reimbursement of David Goldberger or Darla Brown, AD/
producer did not know its merchandise antidumping duties occurred and the CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
was destined for the United States, or subsequent assessment of double and Compliance, International Trade
for any respondent for which we have antidumping duties. Administration, U.S. Department of
a final determination of no shipments, Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
we will instruct CBP to liquidate Notification to Interested Parties
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate Commerce is issuing and publishing (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–1791,
if there is no rate for the intermediate these results in accordance with respectively.
company (or companies) involved in the sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
transaction.13 Act. Background
Dated: November 2, 2018. On March 5, 2018, Commerce
Cash Deposit Requirements
Gary Taverman, published in the Federal Register a
The following cash deposit notice of opportunity to request an
requirements will be effective upon Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, administrative review of the CVD order
publication of the notice of final results performing the non-exclusive functions and on certain uncoated paper from
of this administrative review for all duties of the Assistant Secretary for Indonesia for the POR.1 On April 2,
shipments of the subject merchandise Enforcement and Compliance. 2018, Commerce received a timely
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, request from PT Anugerah Kertas
for consumption on or after the date of Appendix Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, and
publication, as provided by section List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash Decision Memorandum Limited (collectively, APRIL), in
deposit rate for Hyundai and POSCO/ 1. Summary accordance with section 751(a) of the
PDW in the final results of review will 2. Background Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
be equal to the weighted-average 3. Scope of the Order and 19 CFR 351.213(b), to conduct an
dumping margin established in the final 4. Discussion of the Methodology administrative review of this CVD
results of this administrative review; (2) Comparison to Normal Value order.2
for merchandise exported by producers A. Determination of the Comparison On May 2, 2018, Commerce published
or exporters not covered in this review Method in the Federal Register a notice of
but covered in a prior segment of the B. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis initiation with respect to APRIL.3 On
Date of Sale
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will July 13, 2018, APRIL timely withdrew
Product Comparisons
continue to be the company-specific rate Export Price/Constructed Export Price its request for an administrative
published for the most recently Normal Value review.4
completed segment of this proceeding in A. Home Market Viability
which they were reviewed; (3) if the Rescission of Review
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s-
exporter is not a firm covered in this Length Test Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
review or the original investigation but C. Level of Trade Secretary will rescind an administrative
the producer is, the cash deposit rate D. Cost of Production Analysis review, in whole or in part, if a party
will be the rate established for the most 1. Calculation of COP who requested the review withdraws
recently completed segment of this 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices the request within 90 days of the date
3. Results of the COP Test of publication of notice of initiation of
proceeding for the producer of the
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate Comparison Market Prices
the requested review. As noted above,
for all other producers or exporters will 5. Currency Conversion APRIL withdrew its request for review
continue to be 5.55 percent,14 the all- 6. Recommendation by the 90-day deadline, and no other
others rate established in the less-than- [FR Doc. 2018–24796 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
party requested an administrative
fair-value investigation. These cash review of this order. Therefore, we are
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
deposit requirements, when imposed, rescinding the administrative review of
shall remain in effect until further the CVD order on certain uncoated
notice. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE paper from Indonesia covering the
period January 1, 2017, through
Notification to Importers
International Trade Administration December 31, 2017.
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their [C–560–829] Assessment
responsibility under 19 CFR Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Certain Uncoated Paper From and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
regarding the reimbursement of Indonesia: Rescission of 2017 countervailing duties on all appropriate
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Countervailing Duty Administrative entries. Countervailing duties shall be
of the relevant entries during this POR. Review
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
13 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
International Trade Administration, to Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 9284
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Department of Commerce. (March 5, 2018).
14 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 2 See Letter from APRIL, ‘‘Uncoated Paper from
Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the (Commerce) is rescinding the Indonesia,’’ dated April 2, 2018.
Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the administrative review of the 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative countervailing duty (CVD) order on Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 19215 (May 2, 2018).
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and
certain uncoated paper from Indonesia 4 See Letter from APRIL, ‘‘Certain Uncoated Paper
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, for the period of review (POR) January from Indonesia: APRIL—Withdraw of Request for
2016) (Order). 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Administrative Review,’’ dated July 13, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Nov 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57041/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 03:31:29
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 03:31:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable November 14, 2018. | |
| Contact | Benito Ballesteros or Justin Neuman, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) (202) 482-7425 or (202) 482-0486, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 56821 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR