83 FR 57419 - Certain Quartz Surface Products From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Countervailing Duty Investigation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 221 (November 15, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 221 (November 15, 2018)
| Page Range | 57419-57421 | |
| FR Document | 2018-24941 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 57419-57421] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-24941] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-570-085] Certain Quartz Surface Products From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Countervailing Duty Investigation AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of certain quartz surface products (quartz surface products) from certain producers and [[Page 57420]] exporters from the People's Republic of China (China). DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darla Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1791. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 17, 2018, Commerce received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of quartz surface products from China filed in proper form on behalf of the petitioner, Cambria Company LLC.\1\ On May 16, 2018, we initiated this investigation,\2\ and on September 21, 2018, we published an affirmative Preliminary Determination.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See ``Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Certain Quartz Surface Products from the People's Republic of China,'' dated April 17, 2018 (Petition). \2\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 83 FR 22618 (May 16, 2018) (Initiation Notice), and accompanying Initiation Checklist. \3\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination with Final Antidumping Determination, 83 FR 47881 (September 21, 2018) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce selected Fasa Industrial Corporation, Limited (Fasa Industrial), Foshan Yixin Stone Co., Ltd. (Foshan Yixin), and Foshan Hero Stone Co., Ltd. (Hero Stone) as the individually-examined respondents in this investigation. With respect to Hero Stone and Fasa Industrial, in the Preliminary Determination we based the subsidy rates for these respondents on adverse facts available (AFA), in accordance with section 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On October 9, 2018, the petitioner alleged that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of quartz surface products from China, pursuant to section 703(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Letter from the petitioner, ``Certain Quartz Surface Products from the People's Republic of China: Amendment to Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties to Allege Existence of Critical Circumstances,'' dated October 9, 2018 (Critical Circumstances Allegation). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with 19 CFR 351.206(c)(1), if the petitioner submits an allegation of critical circumstances 30 days or more before the scheduled date of the final determination,\6\ Commerce will make a preliminary finding whether there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that critical circumstances exist. Commerce will issue its preliminary finding of critical circumstances within 30 days after the petitioner submits the allegation.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The final determination for this CVD investigation is currently due no later than January 28, 2019. \7\ See 19 CFR 351.206(c)(2)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigation (POI) The POI is January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Critical Circumstances Allegation The petitioner alleged a massive increase of imports of certain quartz surface products from China and provided monthly import data for the period January 2017 through August 2018.\8\ The petitioner states that a comparison of total imports, by quantity, for the period February 2018 through April 2018, to the period May 2018 through July 2018, shows that imports of quartz surface products from China increased by 81 percent,\9\ which is considered ``massive'' under 19 CFR 351.206(h)(2). The petitioner also alleges that there is a reasonable basis to believe that there are subsidies in this investigation which are inconsistent with the Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement (SCM Agreement).\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Amended Critical Circumstances Allegation at Exhibit 1. \9\ See Critical Circumstances Allegation at 2. \10\ Id. at 5-6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical Circumstances Analysis Section 703(e)(1) of the Act provides that Commerce will preliminarily determine that critical circumstances exist if there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that: (A) The alleged countervailable subsidy is inconsistent with the SCM Agreement; \11\ and (B) there have been massive imports of the subject merchandise over a relatively short period. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ Commerce limits its critical circumstances findings to those subsidies contingent upon export performance or use of domestic over imported goods (i.e., those prohibited under Article 3 of the SCM Agreement). See e.g., Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Negative Critical Circumstances Determination: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire from Germany, 67 FR 55808, 55809-10 (August 30, 2002) (Steel Wire from Germany). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In determining whether there are ``massive imports'' over a ``relatively short period,'' pursuant to section 703(e)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(h) and (i), Commerce normally compares the import volumes of the subject merchandise for at least three months immediately preceding the filing of the petition (i.e., the base period) to a comparable period of at least three months following the filing of the petition (i.e., the comparison period). However, the regulations also provide that if Commerce finds that importers, or exporters or producers, had reason to believe, at some time prior to the beginning of the proceeding, that a proceeding was likely, Commerce may consider a period of not less than three months from the earlier time.\12\ Imports must increase by at least 15 percent during the comparison period to be considered massive.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.206(i). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.206(h)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Foshan Yixin In the Preliminary Determination, we found that Foshan Yixin did not receive any countervailable subsidies during the POI that are inconsistent with the SCM Agreement.\14\ Accordingly, because the requirement under section 703(e)(1)(A) of the Act has not been met, we preliminarily determine that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to Foshan Yixin. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at Analysis of Programs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone As explained in our Preliminary Determination, we applied total adverse facts available (AFA) to Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. In applying total AFA to these two companies, we preliminarily determined that both Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone benefited from countervailable subsidies under the ``Export Assistance Grants'' program.\15\ Although we did not make a preliminary finding as to whether the ``Export Assistance Grants'' program was inconsistent with the SCM Agreement in the Preliminary Determination, we now preliminarily find, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, that there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that the program, as alleged in the Petition and supported by information reasonably available to the petitioner, is export contingent within the meaning of section 771(5A)(B) of the Act and, thus, inconsistent with the SCM Agreement.\16\ We preliminarily found this program to have a program-specific rate of 0.58 percent.\17\ We are making the inconsistency determination [[Page 57421]] with regard to this program, which had the lowest rate in the Preliminary Determination among the programs alleged to be inconsistent with the SCM Agreement. In so doing, we intend to limit the corresponding offset to the dumping margin (if one is found) in the companion antidumping duty investigation, which best fulfills our statutory mandate ``to ensure that the party does not obtain a more favorable result by failing to cooperate than if it had cooperated fully,'' \18\ and induce future cooperation by companies in investigations where the petitioners allege the existence of programs potentially inconsistent with the SCM Agreement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Id. at 11. \16\ See Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Quartz Surface Products from the People's Republic of China, dated May 7, 2018. \17\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at Appendix. \18\ Statement of Administrative Action accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. 103-316, Vol. 1 (1994) at 870, reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4199. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because we preliminarily find that the ``Export Assistance Grants'' program is export contingent, we preliminarily find that the criterion under section 703(e)(1)(A) of the Act has been met. In addition, for the purposes of the ``massive imports'' analysis, we preliminarily determine, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, that Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone shipped quartz surface products in ``massive'' quantities during the comparison period, thereby fulfilling the criteria under section 703(e)(1)(B) of the Act.\19\ As a result, we preliminarily determine that critical circumstances exist with regard to Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Critical Circumstances Allegation at Exhibit 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All Other Companies We based the all-others rate applied in the Preliminary Determination on the rate preliminarily calculated for Foshan Yixin. As noted above, we preliminarily found that Foshan Yixin did not use any countervailable subsidies inconsistent with the SCM Agreement. As a result, we also preliminarily determine that all other exporters of subject merchandise from China not selected as mandatory respondents did not use countervailable subsidies inconsistent with the SCM Agreement, and thus preliminarily find that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to the companies covered by the all-others rate. Final Determination We will make a final determination concerning critical circumstances in the final determination of this investigation, which is currently scheduled for January 28, 2019. Public Comment Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in this investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\20\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this investigation are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \21\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Electronically filed documents must be received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due dates established above.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(e)(2)(A) of the Act, for Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone, we will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of any unliquidated entries of subject merchandise from the China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after June 23, 2018, which is 90 days prior to the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register. For such entries, CBP shall require a cash deposit equal to the estimated preliminary subsidy rates established for Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone in the Preliminary Determination. This suspension of liquidation will remain in effect until further notice. ITC Notification In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of this preliminary determination of critical circumstances. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 8, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018-24941 Filed 11-14-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices 57419
Suspension Agreements described in (i)–(iv). These regulations CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal,
None require any party, when submitting clarification and correction filed
factual information, to specify under pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3)
Duty Absorption Reviews which subsection of 19 CFR comments concerning the selection of a
During any administrative review 351.102(b)(21) the information is being surrogate country and surrogate values
covering all or part of a period falling submitted and, if the information is and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning
between the first and second or third submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
and fourth anniversary of the factual information already on the data; and (5) quantity and value
publication of an antidumping duty record, to provide an explanation questionnaires. Under certain
order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a identifying the information already on circumstances, Commerce may elect to
determination under 19 CFR the record that the factual information specify a different time limit by which
351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The extension requests will be considered
suspended investigation (after sunset regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also untimely for submissions which are due
review), the Secretary, if requested by a provide specific time limits for such from multiple parties simultaneously. In
domestic interested party within 30 factual submissions based on the type of such a case, Commerce will inform
days of the date of publication of the factual information being submitted. parties in the letter or memorandum
notice of initiation of the review, will Please review the final rule, available at setting forth the deadline (including a
determine whether antidumping duties http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ specified time) by which extension
have been absorbed by an exporter or 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to requests must be filed to be considered
producer subject to the review if the submitting factual information in this timely. This modification also requires
subject merchandise is sold in the segment. that an extension request must be made
United States through an importer that Any party submitting factual in a separate, stand-alone submission,
is affiliated with such exporter or information in an antidumping duty or and clarifies the circumstances under
producer. The request must include the countervailing duty proceeding must which Commerce will grant untimely-
name(s) of the exporter or producer for certify to the accuracy and completeness filed requests for the extension of time
which the inquiry is requested. of that information.10 Parties are hereby limits. These modifications are effective
reminded that revised certification for all segments initiated on or after
Gap Period Liquidation requirements are in effect for company/ October 21, 2013. Please review the
For the first administrative review of government officials as well as their final rule, available at http://
any order, there will be no assessment representatives. All segments of any www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/
of antidumping or countervailing duties antidumping duty or countervailing html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
on entries of subject merchandise duty proceedings initiated on or after submitting factual information in these
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, August 16, 2013, should use the formats segments.
for consumption during the relevant for the revised certifications provided at These initiations and this notice are
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of the end of the Final Rule.11 Commerce in accordance with section 751(a) of the
the order, if such a gap period is intends to reject factual submissions in Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
applicable to the POR. any proceeding segments if the 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Administrative Protective Orders and submitting party does not comply with
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Letters of Appearance applicable revised certification
requirements. James Maeder,
Interested parties must submit Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
applications for disclosure under Extension of Time Limits Regulation Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
administrative protective orders in Parties may request an extension of Operations performing the duties of Deputy
accordance with the procedures time limits before a time limit Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
outlined in Commerce’s regulations at Countervailing Duty Operations.
established under part 351 expires, or as
19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures otherwise specified by the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–24943 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
apply to administrative reviews See 19 CFR 351.302. In general, an BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
included in this notice of initiation. extension request will be considered
Parties wishing to participate in any of untimely if it is filed after the time limit
these administrative reviews should established under part 351 expires. For DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
ensure that they meet the requirements submissions which are due from International Trade Administration
of these procedures (e.g., the filing of multiple parties simultaneously, an
separate letters of appearance as extension request will be considered [C–570–085]
discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on
the due date. Examples include, but are Certain Quartz Surface Products From
Factual Information Requirements
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal the People’s Republic of China:
Commerce’s regulations identify five briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; Preliminary Affirmative Determination
categories of factual information in 19 (2) factual information to value factors of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in
CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the Countervailing Duty Investigation
summarized as follows: (i) Evidence the adequacy of remuneration under 19
submitted in response to questionnaires; AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
(ii) evidence submitted in support of International Trade Administration,
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
allegations; (iii) publicly available 10 See
Department of Commerce.
section 782(b) of the Act.
information to value factors under 19 11 See Certification of Factual Information To SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the Import Administration During Antidumping and (Commerce) preliminarily determines
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July that critical circumstances exist with
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
respect to imports of certain quartz
the record by Commerce; and (v) http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/ surface products (quartz surface
evidence other than factual information factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. products) from certain producers and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57640/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices 57421
with regard to this program, which had Public Comment DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
the lowest rate in the Preliminary
Determination among the programs Case briefs or other written comments International Trade Administration
alleged to be inconsistent with the SCM may be submitted to the Assistant
[A–570–073]
Agreement. In so doing, we intend to Secretary for Enforcement and
limit the corresponding offset to the Compliance no later than seven days Antidumping Duty Investigation of
dumping margin (if one is found) in the after the date on which the last Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From
companion antidumping duty verification report is issued in this the People’s Republic of China:
investigation, which best fulfills our investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to Affirmative Final Determination of
statutory mandate ‘‘to ensure that the issues raised in case briefs, may be Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value
party does not obtain a more favorable submitted no later than five days after
result by failing to cooperate than if it the deadline date for case briefs.20 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
had cooperated fully,’’ 18 and induce Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and International Trade Administration,
future cooperation by companies in (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or Department of Commerce.
investigations where the petitioners rebuttal briefs in this investigation are SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
allege the existence of programs encouraged to submit with each (Commerce) determines that common
potentially inconsistent with the SCM argument: (1) A statement of the issue; alloy aluminum sheet (common alloy
Agreement. (2) a brief summary of the argument; sheet) from the People’s Republic of
and (3) a table of authorities.21 China (China) is being, or is likely to be,
Because we preliminarily find that the
sold in the United States at less-than-
‘‘Export Assistance Grants’’ program is Electronically filed documents must
fair value (LTFV) for the period of
export contingent, we preliminarily find be received successfully in their entirety
investigation (POI) April 1, 2017,
that the criterion under section by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due
through September 30, 2017.
703(e)(1)(A) of the Act has been met. In dates established above.22
addition, for the purposes of the DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018.
‘‘massive imports’’ analysis, we Suspension of Liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
preliminarily determine, pursuant to Scott Hoefke or Julie Geiger, AD/CVD
In accordance with section
section 776(b) of the Act, that Fasa Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
703(e)(2)(A) of the Act, for Fasa
Industrial and Hero Stone shipped Compliance, International Trade
Industrial and Hero Stone, we will
quartz surface products in ‘‘massive’’ Administration, U.S. Department of
direct U.S. Customs and Border
quantities during the comparison Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
period, thereby fulfilling the criteria of any unliquidated entries of subject
under section 703(e)(1)(B) of the Act.19 (202) 482–4947 and (202) 482–2057,
merchandise from the China entered, or respectively.
As a result, we preliminarily determine
withdrawn from warehouse for
that critical circumstances exist with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
consumption, on or after June 23, 2018,
regard to Fasa Industrial and Hero
which is 90 days prior to the date of Background
Stone.
publication of the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register. On June 6, 2018, Commerce published
All Other Companies
For such entries, CBP shall require a in the Federal Register the Preliminary
We based the all-others rate applied cash deposit equal to the estimated Determination and invited interested
in the Preliminary Determination on the preliminary subsidy rates established parties to comment.1 On August 8, 2018,
rate preliminarily calculated for Foshan for Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone in Commerce published in the Federal
Yixin. As noted above, we preliminarily the Preliminary Determination. This Register the Amended Preliminary
found that Foshan Yixin did not use any Determination.2 A summary of the
suspension of liquidation will remain in
countervailable subsidies inconsistent events that occurred since Commerce
effect until further notice.
with the SCM Agreement. As a result, published the Preliminary
we also preliminarily determine that all ITC Notification Determination, as well as a full
other exporters of subject merchandise discussion of the issues raised by parties
from China not selected as mandatory In accordance with section 703(f) of for this final determination, may be
respondents did not use countervailable the Act, we will notify the ITC of this found in the Issues and Decision
subsidies inconsistent with the SCM preliminary determination of critical Memorandum that is dated concurrently
Agreement, and thus preliminarily find circumstances. with this determination and hereby
that critical circumstances do not exist This determination is issued and adopted by this notice.3
with respect to the companies covered published pursuant to sections 703(f)
1 See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common
by the all-others rate. and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic
Final Determination Dated: November 8, 2018. of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, Preliminary
Gary Taverman, Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstance,
We will make a final determination Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Postponement of Final Determination, 83 FR
concerning critical circumstances in the and Countervailing Duty Operations, 29088 (June 22, 2018) (Preliminary Determination)
final determination of this investigation, performing the non-exclusive functions and and accompanying Preliminary Decision
which is currently scheduled for duties of the Assistant Secretary for Memorandum.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
2 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the
January 28, 2019. Enforcement and Compliance.
People’s Republic of China: Amended Preliminary
[FR Doc. 2018–24941 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am] Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than
18 Statement of Administrative Action Fair Value, 83 FR 39056 (August 8, 2018) (Amended
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Preliminary Determination).
H.R. Doc. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994) at 870, reprinted 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
20 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4199. Memorandum for the Final Results of the
19 See Critical Circumstances Allegation at 21 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy
Exhibit 1. 22 See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_57640/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-15 04:00:42
Document Modified: 2018-11-15 04:00:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable November 15, 2018. | |
| Contact | Darla Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1791. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 57419 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR