83_FR_57642 83 FR 57421 - Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value

83 FR 57421 - Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 221 (November 15, 2018)

Page Range57421-57424
FR Document2018-24869

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that common alloy aluminum sheet (common alloy sheet) from the People's Republic of China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation (POI) April 1, 2017, through September 30, 2017.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57421-57424]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-073]


Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet 
From the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of 
Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that common 
alloy aluminum sheet (common alloy sheet) from the People's Republic of 
China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States 
at less-than-fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation (POI) 
April 1, 2017, through September 30, 2017.

DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke or Julie Geiger, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4947 and (202) 482-2057, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 6, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
Preliminary Determination and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ 
On August 8, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
Amended Preliminary Determination.\2\ A summary of the events that 
occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination, as 
well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this 
final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
that is dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted 
by this notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum 
Sheet from the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary 
Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, Preliminary 
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstance, and Postponement 
of Final Determination, 83 FR 29088 (June 22, 2018) (Preliminary 
Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic 
of China: Amended Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 39056 (August 8, 2018) (Amended 
Preliminary Determination).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy 
Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57422]]

    The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and 
is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of 
the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic version are identical in content.

Scope Comments

    We invited parties to comment on Commerce's Scope Comments 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\ Commerce has reviewed the briefs 
submitted by interested parties, considered the arguments therein, and 
has made no changes to the scope of the investigation. For further 
discussion, see Commerce's Scope Comments Final Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 
People's Republic of China: Scope Comments Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum,'' dated June 15, 2018.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 
People's Republic of China: Scope Comments Final Decision 
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section 
731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our final determination, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is common alloy sheet 
from China. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see Appendix I.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, in July, we conducted 
verification of the questionnaire responses submitted by Henan Mingtai 
Industrial Co., Ltd. and Zhengzhou Mingtai (collectively, Mingtai). We 
issued verification reports on August 28, 2018.\6\ We used standard 
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant 
accounting and financial records, and original source documents 
provided by Mingtai.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Commerce Memoranda, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., ltd. and Zhengzhou 
Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd. in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation 
of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of 
China,'' dated August 28, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    The POI is April 1, 2017, through September 30, 2017.

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were 
submitted by parties are discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we 
responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this 
notice at Appendix II.

Final Affirmative Determination, in Part, of Critical Circumstances

    In the Preliminary Determination, we found that critical 
circumstances exist for to Nanjie Resources Co., Limited (Nanjie), Yong 
Jie New Material Co., Ltd. (Yong Jie New Material), and Zhejiang 
Yongjie Aluminum Co., Ltd. (Yongjie Aluminum) (collectively, Yongjie 
Companies); Zhejiang GKO Aluminium Stock Co., Ltd. (GKO Aluminium); the 
companies eligible for a separate rate; and the China-wide entity.\7\ 
After analyzing comments received from interested parties regarding our 
preliminary critical circumstances determinations, we continue to find 
that, in accordance with section 735(a)(3) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.206, critical circumstances exist with respect to Nanjie, the 
Yongjie Companies, GKO Aluminium, the companies eligible for a separate 
rate, and the China-wide entity.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 29089.
    \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)

    For the final determination we continue to rely upon facts 
otherwise available, with adverse inferences (AFA), for the China-wide 
entity, the Yongjie Companies, and GKO Aluminium, pursuant to sections 
776(a) and (b) of the Act.

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from 
parties, and minor corrections presented at verification, we made 
certain changes to Mingtai's margin calculation since the Preliminary 
Determination. For Mingtai, we calculated U.S. price and normal value 
using the same methodology stated in the Preliminary Determination, 
except as follows:
     We revised the surrogate value for Mingtai's argon factor 
of production using data from Bulgaria instead of South Africa.
     We revised the surrogate value for Mingtai's prompt 
aluminum scrap factor of production.
     We revised Mingtai's normal value calculation by: (1) 
Disallowing a claimed by-product offset; and (2) treating run-around 
aluminum scrap as a direct material input, not as a by-product.

China-Wide Entity

    For the final determination, we continue to find that the China-
wide entity, which includes certain Chinese exporters and/or producers 
that did not respond to Commerce's requests for information, including 
mandatory respondents GKO Aluminium and the Yongjie Companies, failed 
to provide necessary information, failed to provide information in a 
timely manner, and significantly impeded this proceeding by not 
submitting the requested information. We also continue to find that the 
China-wide entity failed to cooperate to the best of its ability. As a 
result, we continue to rely on AFA in determining the rate for the 
China-wide entity and, as AFA, we select the highest rate listed in the 
initiation of the investigation (i.e., 59.72 percent), which is greater 
than the revised weighted-average dumping margin of Mingtai (i.e., 
49.85 percent).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 5-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combination Rates

    Consistent with Preliminary Determination \10\ and Policy Bulletin 
05.1,\11\ Commerce calculated combination rates for the respondents 
that are eligible for a separate rate in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 29089-29090.
    \11\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1, 
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination 
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy 
Countries,'' (April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on 
Commerce's website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination

    The final weighted-average antidumping margins are as follows:

[[Page 57423]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                   Cash deposit
                                                                                     Weighted-     adjusted for
                   Exporter                                 Producer              average margin  subsidy offset
                                                                                     (percent)       (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., Ltd./          Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co.,           49.85           49.85
 Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd.            Ltd./Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry
                                                 Co., Ltd.
Alcha International Holdings Limited..........  Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd           49.85           49.85
Alumax Composite Material (Jiangyin) Co., Ltd.  Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd..........           49.85           49.85
Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd..........  Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co.,           49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Henan Founder Beyond Industry Co., Ltd........  Henan Xintai Aluminum Industry             49.85           49.85
                                                 Co., Ltd.
Huafon Nikkei Aluminium Corporation...........  Huafon Nikkei Aluminium                    49.85           49.85
                                                 Corporation.
Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd...........  Henan Jinyang Luyue Co., Ltd....           49.85           49.85
Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd...........  Jiangsu Zhong He Aluminum Co.,             49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Jiangyin Litai Ornamental Materials Co., Ltd..  Jiangyin Litai Ornamental                  49.85           49.85
                                                 Materials Co., Ltd.
Jiangyin New Alumax Composite Material Co. Ltd  Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd..........           49.85           49.85
Shandong Fuhai Industrial Co., Ltd............  Shandong Fuhai Industrial Co.,             49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Tianjin Zhongwang Aluminium Co., Ltd..........  Tianjin Zhongwang Aluminium Co.,           49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd.........  Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil               49.85           49.85
                                                 Co., Ltd.
Yantai Jintai International Trade Co., Ltd....  Shandong Nanshan Aluminium Co.,            49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd................  Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd..           49.85           49.85
Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited.................  Henan Zhongyuan Aluminum Co.,              49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited.................  Luoyang Xinlong Aluminum Co.,              49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited.................  Shanghai Dongshuo Metal Trade              49.85           49.85
                                                 Co., Ltd.
Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited.................  Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry Co.,            49.85           49.85
                                                 Ltd.
                                                                                 -------------------------------
    China-Wide Entity \12\....................  ................................           59.72           59.72
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding the 
calculations performed for this final determination within five days of 
the date of public announcement of our final determination, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The China-wide entity also includes the following companies 
that filed separate rate applications: Nanjie Resources Co., 
Limited, Yong Jie New Material Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Yongjie 
Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhejiang GKO Aluminium Stock Co., Ltd.; Alnan 
Aluminium Inc.; Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd.; CHALCO-SWA Cold Rolling 
Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Wanji Aluminium Processing Co., Ltd.; and Wanji 
Global (Singapore) PTE. LTD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, for this final 
determination, we will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of common alloy sheet 
from China, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which are 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after June 
6, 2018, the date of publication in the Federal Register of the 
affirmative Preliminary Determination. Further, pursuant to section 
733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), Commerce will instruct 
CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the weighted average amount by 
which normal value exceeds U.S. price, as indicated in the chart above 
as follows: (1) For the producer/exporter combinations listed in the 
table above, the cash deposit rate is equal to the estimated weighted-
average dumping margin listed for that combination in the table; (2) 
for all combinations of Chinese producers/exporters of merchandise 
under consideration that have not established eligibility for their own 
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margin established for the China-wide entity; 
and (3) for all third-county exporters of merchandise under 
consideration not listed in the table above, the cash deposit rate is 
the cash deposit rate applicable to the Chinese producer/exporter 
combination (or the China-wide entity) that supplied that third country 
exporter. These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in 
effect until further notice.

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the 
International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination 
is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the 
ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic 
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with 
material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of 
sales) for importation of common alloy sheet, no later than 45 days 
after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury 
does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all cash 
deposits posted will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such 
injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order 
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, 
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective 
date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the 
``Suspension of Liquidation'' section.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice will serve as a reminder to the parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of propriety information disclosed under APO 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of 
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information

    In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, 
this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of 
their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply

[[Page 57424]]

with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to 
sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Dated: November 5, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is aluminum common 
alloy sheet (common alloy sheet), which is a flat-rolled aluminum 
product having a thickness of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 0.2 
mm, in coils or cut-to-length, regardless of width. Common alloy 
sheet within the scope of this investigation includes both not clad 
aluminum sheet, as well as multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet. With 
respect to not clad aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is 
manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy as designated 
by the Aluminum Association. With respect to multi-alloy, clad 
aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series 
core, to which cladding layers are applied to either one or both 
sides of the core.
    Common alloy sheet may be made to ASTM specification B209-14, 
but can also be made to other specifications. Regardless of 
specification, however, all common alloy sheet meeting the scope 
description is included in the scope. Subject merchandise includes 
common alloy sheet that has been further processed in a third 
country, including but not limited to annealing, tempering, 
painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching, and/or slitting, 
or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the 
merchandise from the scope of the investigations if performed in the 
country of manufacture of the common alloy sheet.
    Excluded from the scope of this investigation is aluminum can 
stock, which is suitable for use in the manufacture of aluminum 
beverage cans, lids of such cans, or tabs used to open such cans. 
Aluminum can stock is produced to gauges that range from 0.200 mm to 
0.292 mm, and has an H-19, H-41, H-48, or H-391 temper. In addition, 
aluminum can stock has a lubricant applied to the flat surfaces of 
the can stock to facilitate its movement through machines used in 
the manufacture of beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is properly 
classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055.
    Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set for the above.
    Common alloy sheet is currently classifiable under HTSUS 
subheadings 7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3090, 7606.12.6000, 
7606.91.3090, 7606.91.6080, 7606.92.3090, and 7606.92.6080. Further, 
merchandise that falls within the scope of this investigation may 
also be entered into the United States under HTSUS subheadings 
7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3030, 7606.91.3060, 7606.91.6040, 
7606.92.3060, 7606.92.6040, 7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope of this investigation is 
dispositive.

Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Period of Investigation
V. Scope of Investigation
VI. Scope Comments
VII. Changes from the Preliminary Determination
VIII. Adjustment Under Section 777A(F) of the Act
IX. Selection and Corroboration of the Adverse Facts Available Rate
X. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
    Comment 2: Critical Circumstances Determination
    Comment 3: Surrogate Country
    Comment 4: Surrogate Value for Aluminum Scrap
    Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Argon
    Comment 6: Mingtai's Aluminum Scrap
    Comment 7: Separate Rate Status for Wanji Global and Luoyang 
Wanji
    Comment 8: Separate Rate Status for Tianjin Zhongwang
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-24869 Filed 11-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices                                                  57421

                                               with regard to this program, which had                  Public Comment                                        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               the lowest rate in the Preliminary
                                               Determination among the programs                           Case briefs or other written comments              International Trade Administration
                                               alleged to be inconsistent with the SCM                 may be submitted to the Assistant
                                                                                                                                                             [A–570–073]
                                               Agreement. In so doing, we intend to                    Secretary for Enforcement and
                                               limit the corresponding offset to the                   Compliance no later than seven days                   Antidumping Duty Investigation of
                                               dumping margin (if one is found) in the                 after the date on which the last                      Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From
                                               companion antidumping duty                              verification report is issued in this                 the People’s Republic of China:
                                               investigation, which best fulfills our                  investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to            Affirmative Final Determination of
                                               statutory mandate ‘‘to ensure that the                  issues raised in case briefs, may be                  Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value
                                               party does not obtain a more favorable                  submitted no later than five days after
                                               result by failing to cooperate than if it               the deadline date for case briefs.20                  AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                               had cooperated fully,’’ 18 and induce                   Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and                  International Trade Administration,
                                               future cooperation by companies in                      (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or             Department of Commerce.
                                               investigations where the petitioners                    rebuttal briefs in this investigation are             SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                               allege the existence of programs                        encouraged to submit with each                        (Commerce) determines that common
                                               potentially inconsistent with the SCM                   argument: (1) A statement of the issue;               alloy aluminum sheet (common alloy
                                               Agreement.                                              (2) a brief summary of the argument;                  sheet) from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                       and (3) a table of authorities.21                     China (China) is being, or is likely to be,
                                                  Because we preliminarily find that the
                                                                                                                                                             sold in the United States at less-than-
                                               ‘‘Export Assistance Grants’’ program is                    Electronically filed documents must
                                                                                                                                                             fair value (LTFV) for the period of
                                               export contingent, we preliminarily find                be received successfully in their entirety
                                                                                                                                                             investigation (POI) April 1, 2017,
                                               that the criterion under section                        by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due
                                                                                                                                                             through September 30, 2017.
                                               703(e)(1)(A) of the Act has been met. In                dates established above.22
                                               addition, for the purposes of the                                                                             DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018.
                                               ‘‘massive imports’’ analysis, we                        Suspension of Liquidation                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               preliminarily determine, pursuant to                                                                          Scott Hoefke or Julie Geiger, AD/CVD
                                                                                                          In accordance with section
                                               section 776(b) of the Act, that Fasa                                                                          Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
                                                                                                       703(e)(2)(A) of the Act, for Fasa
                                               Industrial and Hero Stone shipped                                                                             Compliance, International Trade
                                                                                                       Industrial and Hero Stone, we will
                                               quartz surface products in ‘‘massive’’                                                                        Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                                                                       direct U.S. Customs and Border
                                               quantities during the comparison                                                                              Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                                                                                       Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation               NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
                                               period, thereby fulfilling the criteria                 of any unliquidated entries of subject
                                               under section 703(e)(1)(B) of the Act.19                                                                      (202) 482–4947 and (202) 482–2057,
                                                                                                       merchandise from the China entered, or                respectively.
                                               As a result, we preliminarily determine
                                                                                                       withdrawn from warehouse for
                                               that critical circumstances exist with                                                                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                       consumption, on or after June 23, 2018,
                                               regard to Fasa Industrial and Hero
                                                                                                       which is 90 days prior to the date of                 Background
                                               Stone.
                                                                                                       publication of the Preliminary
                                                                                                       Determination in the Federal Register.                  On June 6, 2018, Commerce published
                                               All Other Companies
                                                                                                       For such entries, CBP shall require a                 in the Federal Register the Preliminary
                                                  We based the all-others rate applied                 cash deposit equal to the estimated                   Determination and invited interested
                                               in the Preliminary Determination on the                 preliminary subsidy rates established                 parties to comment.1 On August 8, 2018,
                                               rate preliminarily calculated for Foshan                for Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone in                 Commerce published in the Federal
                                               Yixin. As noted above, we preliminarily                 the Preliminary Determination. This                   Register the Amended Preliminary
                                               found that Foshan Yixin did not use any                                                                       Determination.2 A summary of the
                                                                                                       suspension of liquidation will remain in
                                               countervailable subsidies inconsistent                                                                        events that occurred since Commerce
                                                                                                       effect until further notice.
                                               with the SCM Agreement. As a result,                                                                          published the Preliminary
                                               we also preliminarily determine that all                ITC Notification                                      Determination, as well as a full
                                               other exporters of subject merchandise                                                                        discussion of the issues raised by parties
                                               from China not selected as mandatory                      In accordance with section 703(f) of                for this final determination, may be
                                               respondents did not use countervailable                 the Act, we will notify the ITC of this               found in the Issues and Decision
                                               subsidies inconsistent with the SCM                     preliminary determination of critical                 Memorandum that is dated concurrently
                                               Agreement, and thus preliminarily find                  circumstances.                                        with this determination and hereby
                                               that critical circumstances do not exist                  This determination is issued and                    adopted by this notice.3
                                               with respect to the companies covered                   published pursuant to sections 703(f)
                                                                                                                                                               1 See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common
                                               by the all-others rate.                                 and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                                                                                                                             Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic
                                               Final Determination                                       Dated: November 8, 2018.                            of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of
                                                                                                                                                             Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, Preliminary
                                                                                                       Gary Taverman,                                        Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstance,
                                                  We will make a final determination                   Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping            and Postponement of Final Determination, 83 FR
                                               concerning critical circumstances in the                and Countervailing Duty Operations,                   29088 (June 22, 2018) (Preliminary Determination)
                                               final determination of this investigation,              performing the non-exclusive functions and            and accompanying Preliminary Decision
                                               which is currently scheduled for                        duties of the Assistant Secretary for                 Memorandum.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                               2 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the
                                               January 28, 2019.                                       Enforcement and Compliance.
                                                                                                                                                             People’s Republic of China: Amended Preliminary
                                                                                                       [FR Doc. 2018–24941 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]          Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than
                                                 18 Statement  of Administrative Action                                                                      Fair Value, 83 FR 39056 (August 8, 2018) (Amended
                                                                                                       BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                               accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,                                                                Preliminary Determination).
                                               H.R. Doc. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994) at 870, reprinted                                                              3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                                                                         20 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
                                               in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4199.                                                                              Memorandum for the Final Results of the
                                                 19 See Critical Circumstances Allegation at             21 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).             Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy
                                               Exhibit 1.                                                22 See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1).                                                                  Continued




                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:53 Nov 14, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00023   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM   15NON1


                                               57422                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices

                                                  The Issues and Decision                              We used standard verification                         Mingtai’s margin calculation since the
                                               Memorandum is a public document and                     procedures, including an examination of               Preliminary Determination. For Mingtai,
                                               is on file electronically via Enforcement               relevant accounting and financial                     we calculated U.S. price and normal
                                               and Compliance’s Antidumping and                        records, and original source documents                value using the same methodology
                                               Countervailing Duty Centralized                         provided by Mingtai.                                  stated in the Preliminary Determination,
                                               Electronic Service System (ACCESS).                                                                           except as follows:
                                                                                                       Period of Investigation
                                               ACCESS is available to registered users                                                                         • We revised the surrogate value for
                                               at http://access.trade.gov and is                         The POI is April 1, 2017, through                   Mingtai’s argon factor of production
                                               available to all parties in the Central                 September 30, 2017.                                   using data from Bulgaria instead of
                                               Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main                                                                          South Africa.
                                                                                                       Analysis of Comments Received
                                               Department of Commerce building. In
                                               addition, a complete version of the                        The issues raised in the case and                    • We revised the surrogate value for
                                               Issues and Decision Memorandum can                      rebuttal briefs that were submitted by                Mingtai’s prompt aluminum scrap factor
                                               be accessed directly at http://                         parties are discussed in the Issues and               of production.
                                               enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed                  Decision Memorandum. A list of the                       • We revised Mingtai’s normal value
                                               Issues and Decision Memorandum and                      issues that parties raised, and to which              calculation by: (1) Disallowing a
                                               the electronic version are identical in                 we responded in the Issues and                        claimed by-product offset; and (2)
                                               content.                                                Decision Memorandum, is attached to                   treating run-around aluminum scrap as
                                                                                                       this notice at Appendix II.                           a direct material input, not as a by-
                                               Scope Comments
                                                                                                       Final Affirmative Determination, in                   product.
                                                 We invited parties to comment on                      Part, of Critical Circumstances
                                               Commerce’s Scope Comments                                                                                     China-Wide Entity
                                               Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4                          In the Preliminary Determination, we
                                                                                                       found that critical circumstances exist                  For the final determination, we
                                               Commerce has reviewed the briefs
                                                                                                       for to Nanjie Resources Co., Limited                  continue to find that the China-wide
                                               submitted by interested parties,
                                                                                                       (Nanjie), Yong Jie New Material Co.,                  entity, which includes certain Chinese
                                               considered the arguments therein, and
                                                                                                       Ltd. (Yong Jie New Material), and                     exporters and/or producers that did not
                                               has made no changes to the scope of the
                                                                                                       Zhejiang Yongjie Aluminum Co., Ltd.                   respond to Commerce’s requests for
                                               investigation. For further discussion, see
                                                                                                       (Yongjie Aluminum) (collectively,                     information, including mandatory
                                               Commerce’s Scope Comments Final
                                                                                                       Yongjie Companies); Zhejiang GKO                      respondents GKO Aluminium and the
                                               Decision Memorandum.5
                                                                                                       Aluminium Stock Co., Ltd. (GKO                        Yongjie Companies, failed to provide
                                               Methodology                                             Aluminium); the companies eligible for                necessary information, failed to provide
                                                                                                       a separate rate; and the China-wide                   information in a timely manner, and
                                                 Commerce conducted this
                                                                                                       entity.7 After analyzing comments                     significantly impeded this proceeding
                                               investigation in accordance with section
                                                                                                       received from interested parties                      by not submitting the requested
                                               731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                                                                       regarding our preliminary critical                    information. We also continue to find
                                               amended (the Act). For a full
                                                                                                       circumstances determinations, we                      that the China-wide entity failed to
                                               description of the methodology
                                                                                                       continue to find that, in accordance                  cooperate to the best of its ability. As a
                                               underlying our final determination, see
                                                                                                       with section 735(a)(3) of the Act and 19              result, we continue to rely on AFA in
                                               the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
                                                                                                       CFR 351.206, critical circumstances                   determining the rate for the China-wide
                                               Scope of the Investigation                              exist with respect to Nanjie, the Yongjie             entity and, as AFA, we select the
                                                                                                       Companies, GKO Aluminium, the                         highest rate listed in the initiation of the
                                                  The merchandise covered by this
                                                                                                       companies eligible for a separate rate,               investigation (i.e., 59.72 percent), which
                                               investigation is common alloy sheet
                                                                                                       and the China-wide entity.8                           is greater than the revised weighted-
                                               from China. For a complete description
                                                                                                                                                             average dumping margin of Mingtai (i.e.,
                                               of the scope of this investigation, see
                                                                                                       Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)                  49.85 percent).9
                                               Appendix I.
                                                                                                         For the final determination we                      Combination Rates
                                               Verification                                            continue to rely upon facts otherwise
                                                 As provided in section 782(i) of the                  available, with adverse inferences                      Consistent with Preliminary
                                               Act, in July, we conducted verification                 (AFA), for the China-wide entity, the                 Determination 10 and Policy Bulletin
                                               of the questionnaire responses                          Yongjie Companies, and GKO                            05.1,11 Commerce calculated
                                               submitted by Henan Mingtai Industrial                   Aluminium, pursuant to sections 776(a)                combination rates for the respondents
                                               Co., Ltd. and Zhengzhou Mingtai                         and (b) of the Act.                                   that are eligible for a separate rate in
                                               (collectively, Mingtai). We issued                                                                            this investigation.
                                                                                                       Changes Since the Preliminary
                                               verification reports on August 28, 2018.6                                                                     Final Determination
                                                                                                       Determination
                                               Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of              Based on our review and analysis of                   The final weighted-average
                                               China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby            the comments received from parties,
                                               adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision                                                                  antidumping margins are as follows:
                                               Memorandum).
                                                                                                       and minor corrections presented at
                                                 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum             verification, we made certain changes to                9 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 5–7.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                               Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Scope                                                                10 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at
                                               Comments Preliminary Decision Memorandum,’’             Industrial Co., ltd. and Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry   29089–29090.
                                               dated June 15, 2018.                                    Co., Ltd. in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation     11 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
                                                 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum             of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the               Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
                                               Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Scope        People’s Republic of China,’’ dated August 28,        Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
                                               Comments Final Decision Memorandum,’’ dated             2018.                                                 Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
                                               concurrently with this memorandum.                        7 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 29089.
                                                                                                                                                             Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
                                                 6 See Commerce Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the         8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at            Bulletin 05.1), available on Commerce’s website at
                                               Questionnaire Responses of Henan Mingtai Al             Comment 2.                                            http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:53 Nov 14, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM     15NON1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices                                                                               57423

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Cash deposit
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Weighted-     adjusted for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     average
                                                                            Exporter                                                                         Producer                                                               subsidy
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      margin         offset
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    (percent)      (percent)

                                               Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., Ltd./Zhengzhou                            Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., Ltd./Zhengzhou                                                 49.85          49.85
                                                  Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd.                                                 Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd.
                                               Alcha International Holdings Limited ............................          Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd ...............................                                49.85          49.85
                                               Alumax Composite Material (Jiangyin) Co., Ltd ...........                  Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd ................................................                         49.85          49.85
                                               Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ......................                Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ......................                                     49.85          49.85
                                               Henan Founder Beyond Industry Co., Ltd ...................                 Henan Xintai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd ....................                                    49.85          49.85
                                               Huafon Nikkei Aluminium Corporation .........................              Huafon Nikkei Aluminium Corporation .........................                                   49.85          49.85
                                               Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd ...........................            Henan Jinyang Luyue Co., Ltd .....................................                              49.85          49.85
                                               Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd ...........................            Jiangsu Zhong He Aluminum Co., Ltd .........................                                    49.85          49.85
                                               Jiangyin Litai Ornamental Materials Co., Ltd ...............               Jiangyin Litai Ornamental Materials Co., Ltd ...............                                    49.85          49.85
                                               Jiangyin New Alumax Composite Material Co. Ltd ......                      Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd ................................................                         49.85          49.85
                                               Shandong Fuhai Industrial Co., Ltd .............................           Shandong Fuhai Industrial Co., Ltd .............................                                49.85          49.85
                                               Tianjin Zhongwang Aluminium Co., Ltd .......................               Tianjin Zhongwang Aluminium Co., Ltd .......................                                    49.85          49.85
                                               Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd .....................                Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd .....................                                     49.85          49.85
                                               Yantai Jintai International Trade Co., Ltd ....................            Shandong Nanshan Aluminium Co., Ltd ......................                                      49.85          49.85
                                               Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd ....................................        Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd ....................................                             49.85          49.85
                                               Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ....................................         Henan Zhongyuan Aluminum Co., Ltd .........................                                     49.85          49.85
                                               Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ....................................         Luoyang Xinlong Aluminum Co., Ltd ............................                                  49.85          49.85
                                               Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ....................................         Shanghai Dongshuo Metal Trade Co., Ltd ..................                                       49.85          49.85
                                               Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ....................................         Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd ...........................                                 49.85          49.85

                                                    China-Wide Entity 12 ..............................................   .......................................................................................         59.72          59.72



                                               Disclosure                                                       margin listed for that combination in the                                    does exist, Commerce will issue an
                                                 We intend to disclose to parties in                            table; (2) for all combinations of Chinese                                   antidumping duty order directing CBP
                                               this proceeding the calculations                                 producers/exporters of merchandise                                           to assess, upon further instruction by
                                               performed for this final determination                           under consideration that have not                                            Commerce, antidumping duties on all
                                               within five days of the date of public                           established eligibility for their own                                        imports of the subject merchandise
                                               announcement of our final                                        separate rates, the cash deposit rate will                                   entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
                                               determination, in accordance with 19                             be equal to the estimated weighted-                                          for consumption on or after the effective
                                               CFR 351.224(b).                                                  average dumping margin established for                                       date of the suspension of liquidation, as
                                                                                                                the China-wide entity; and (3) for all                                       discussed above in the ‘‘Suspension of
                                               Suspension of Liquidation                                        third-county exporters of merchandise                                        Liquidation’’ section.
                                                 In accordance with section                                     under consideration not listed in the
                                                                                                                                                                                             Notification Regarding Administrative
                                               735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, for this final                          table above, the cash deposit rate is the
                                                                                                                                                                                             Protective Orders
                                               determination, we will direct U.S.                               cash deposit rate applicable to the
                                               Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to                           Chinese producer/exporter combination                                          This notice will serve as a reminder
                                               continue to suspend liquidation of all                           (or the China-wide entity) that supplied                                     to the parties subject to administrative
                                               entries of common alloy sheet from                               that third country exporter. These                                           protective order (APO) of their
                                               China, as described in Appendix I of                             suspension of liquidation instructions                                       responsibility concerning the
                                               this notice, which are entered, or                               will remain in effect until further notice.                                  disposition of propriety information
                                               withdrawn from warehouse, for                                                                                                                 disclosed under APO in accordance
                                                                                                                International Trade Commission
                                               consumption on or after June 6, 2018,                                                                                                         with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
                                                                                                                Notification
                                               the date of publication in the Federal                                                                                                        written notification of return or
                                               Register of the affirmative Preliminary                             In accordance with section 735(d) of                                      destruction of APO materials or
                                               Determination. Further, pursuant to                              the Act, we will notify the International                                    conversion to judicial protective order is
                                               section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19                           Trade Commission (ITC) of the final                                          hereby requested. Failure to comply
                                               CFR 351.205(d), Commerce will instruct                           affirmative determination of sales at                                        with the regulations and terms of an
                                               CBP to require a cash deposit equal to                           LTFV. Because Commerce’s final                                               APO is a sanctionable violation.
                                               the weighted average amount by which                             determination is affirmative, in
                                               normal value exceeds U.S. price, as                                                                                                           Return or Destruction of Proprietary
                                                                                                                accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
                                               indicated in the chart above as follows:                                                                                                      Information
                                                                                                                Act, the ITC will make its final
                                               (1) For the producer/exporter                                    determination as to whether the                                                 In the event the ITC issues a final
                                               combinations listed in the table above,                          domestic industry in the United States                                       negative injury determination, this
                                               the cash deposit rate is equal to the                            is materially injured, or threatened with                                    notice serves as the only reminder to
                                               estimated weighted-average dumping                               material injury, by reason of imports or                                     parties subject to an APO of their
                                                                                                                sales (or the likelihood of sales) for                                       responsibility concerning the
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  12 The China-wide entity also includes the
                                                                                                                importation of common alloy sheet, no                                        destruction of proprietary information
                                               following companies that filed separate rate
                                               applications: Nanjie Resources Co., Limited, Yong                later than 45 days after this final                                          disclosed under APO in accordance
                                               Jie New Material Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Yongjie                 determination. If the ITC determines                                         with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
                                               Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhejiang GKO Aluminium                       that such injury does not exist, this                                        written notification of the return or
                                               Stock Co., Ltd.; Alnan Aluminium Inc.; Chalco                    proceeding will be terminated and all                                        destruction of APO materials, or
                                               Ruimin Co., Ltd.; CHALCO–SWA Cold Rolling Co.,
                                               Ltd.; Luoyang Wanji Aluminium Processing Co.,                    cash deposits posted will be refunded.                                       conversion to judicial protective order,
                                               Ltd.; and Wanji Global (Singapore) PTE. LTD.                     If the ITC determines that such injury                                       is hereby requested. Failure to comply


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014     16:53 Nov 14, 2018      Jkt 247001     PO 00000     Frm 00025       Fmt 4703        Sfmt 4703       E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM                 15NON1


                                               57424                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices

                                               with the regulations and terms of an                    7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3090,             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:     Title III of
                                               APO is a violation subject to sanction.                 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3090, 7606.91.6080,             the Export Trading Company Act of
                                                                                                       7606.92.3090, and 7606.92.6080. Further,              1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) (‘‘the Act’’)
                                               Notification to Interested Parties                      merchandise that falls within the scope of            authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to
                                                 This determination is issued and                      this investigation may also be entered into
                                                                                                       the United States under HTSUS subheadings
                                                                                                                                                             issue Export Trade Certificates of
                                               published in accordance with sections                                                                         Review. An Export Trade Certificate of
                                                                                                       7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3030, 7606.91.3060,
                                               735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19                  7606.91.6040, 7606.92.3060, 7606.92.6040,             Review protects the holder and the
                                               CFR 351.210(c).                                         7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS                      members identified in the Certificate
                                                 Dated: November 5, 2018.                              subheadings are provided for convenience              from State and Federal government
                                               Gary Taverman,                                          and customs purposes, the written                     antitrust actions and from private treble
                                                                                                       description of the scope of this investigation        damage antitrust actions for the export
                                               Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                                                                                       is dispositive.                                       conduct specified in the Certificate and
                                               and Countervailing Duty Operations,
                                               performing the non-exclusive functions and              Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed                  carried out in compliance with its terms
                                               duties of the Assistant Secretary for                   in the Issues and Decision                            and conditions. The regulations
                                               Enforcement and Compliance.                             Memorandum                                            implementing Title III are found at 15
                                                                                                                                                             CFR part 325 (2018). OTEA is issuing
                                               Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation                   I. Summary                                            this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
                                                  The merchandise covered by this                      II. List of Issues                                    which requires the Secretary of
                                               investigation is aluminum common alloy                  III. Background
                                                                                                                                                             Commerce to publish a summary of the
                                               sheet (common alloy sheet), which is a flat-            IV. Period of Investigation
                                                                                                       V. Scope of Investigation                             certification in the Federal Register.
                                               rolled aluminum product having a thickness                                                                    Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15
                                               of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 0.2 mm,             VI. Scope Comments
                                                                                                       VII. Changes from the Preliminary                     CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by
                                               in coils or cut-to-length, regardless of width.
                                               Common alloy sheet within the scope of this                   Determination                                   the Secretary’s determination may,
                                               investigation includes both not clad                    VIII. Adjustment Under Section 777A(F) of             within 30 days of the date of this notice,
                                               aluminum sheet, as well as multi-alloy, clad                  the Act                                         bring an action in any appropriate
                                               aluminum sheet. With respect to not clad                IX. Selection and Corroboration of the                district court of the United States to set
                                               aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is                         Adverse Facts Available Rate                    aside the determination on the ground
                                               manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or                    X. Discussion of the Issues                           that the determination is erroneous.
                                               5XXX-series alloy as designated by the                     Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts
                                               Aluminum Association. With respect to                         Available (AFA)                                 Description of Certified Conduct
                                               multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, common                   Comment 2: Critical Circumstances
                                                                                                                                                                ALCC’s Export Trade Certificate of
                                               alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series                    Determination
                                                                                                          Comment 3: Surrogate Country                       Review has been amended to:
                                               core, to which cladding layers are applied to                                                                    1. Add the following companies as
                                               either one or both sides of the core.                      Comment 4: Surrogate Value for
                                                                                                             Aluminum Scrap                                  new Members of the Certificate within
                                                  Common alloy sheet may be made to
                                                                                                          Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Argon               the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the
                                               ASTM specification B209–14, but can also be
                                               made to other specifications. Regardless of                Comment 6: Mingtai’s Aluminum Scrap                Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)):
                                               specification, however, all common alloy                   Comment 7: Separate Rate Status for Wanji          a. Alaskan Leader Vessel LLC, Lynden,
                                               sheet meeting the scope description is                        Global and Luoyang Wanji                           WA
                                               included in the scope. Subject merchandise                 Comment 8: Separate Rate Status for                b. Bristol Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden,
                                               includes common alloy sheet that has been                     Tianjin Zhongwang                                  WA
                                               further processed in a third country,                   V. Recommendation                                     c. Bering Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden,
                                               including but not limited to annealing,                 [FR Doc. 2018–24869 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]             WA
                                               tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming,              BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                d. Northern Leader Fisheries LLC,
                                               cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any                                                                       Lynden, WA
                                               other processing that would not otherwise                                                                     e. Prowler Fisheries, LLC, Seattle, WA
                                               remove the merchandise from the scope of                DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               the investigations if performed in the country                                                                   2. Delete the following companies as
                                               of manufacture of the common alloy sheet.                                                                     Members of the Certificate:
                                                                                                       International Trade Administration
                                                  Excluded from the scope of this                                                                            a. Pathfinder Fisheries LLC, Seattle, WA
                                               investigation is aluminum can stock, which              [Application No. 10–4A001]                            b. Bering Select Seafoods Company,
                                               is suitable for use in the manufacture of                                                                        Seattle, WA
                                               aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans,              Export Trade Certificate of Review                    c. Glacier Bay Fisheries LLC
                                               or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum                                                                         3. Change/correct the name or
                                               can stock is produced to gauges that range              ACTION:Notice of issuance of an                       location of the following Members of the
                                               from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an H–                amended Export Trade Certificate of
                                               19, H–41, H–48, or H–391 temper. In
                                                                                                                                                             Certificate:
                                               addition, aluminum can stock has a lubricant
                                                                                                       Review to Alaska Longline Cod                         a. Alaskan Leader Fisheries, Inc.,
                                               applied to the flat surfaces of the can stock           Commission (‘‘ALCC’’), Application No.                   Lynden, WA changes to Alaskan
                                               to facilitate its movement through machines             10–4A001.                                                Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden, WA
                                               used in the manufacture of beverage cans.                                                                     b. Coastal Villages Longline, LLC
                                               Aluminum can stock is properly classified               SUMMARY:    The Secretary of Commerce,                   changes to Coastal Villages Longline
                                               under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                 through the Office of Trade and                          LLC, Anchorage, AK
                                               United States (HTSUS) subheadings                       Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), issued an               c. Romanzoff Fishing Company, Seattle,
                                               7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055.                          amended Export Trade Certificate of
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                WA changes to Romanzof Fishing
                                                  Where the nominal and actual                         Review to ALCC on November 7, 2018.
                                               measurements vary, a product is within the
                                                                                                                                                                Company, L.L.C., Seattle, WA
                                                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      d. Tatoosh Seafoods LLC, Seattle, WA
                                               scope if application of either the nominal or
                                               actual measurement would place it within
                                                                                                       Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA,                            changes to Tatoosh Seafoods, LLC,
                                               the scope based on the definitions set for the          International Trade Administration, by                   Edmonds, WA
                                               above.                                                  telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not              e. Beauty Bay Washington, LLC, Seattle,
                                                  Common alloy sheet is currently                      a toll-free number) or email at etca@                    WA changes to Beauty Bay
                                               classifiable under HTSUS subheadings                    trade.gov.                                               Washington, LLC, Edmonds, WA


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:53 Nov 14, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00026   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM   15NON1



Document Created: 2018-11-15 04:00:51
Document Modified: 2018-11-15 04:00:51
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable November 15, 2018.
ContactScott Hoefke or Julie Geiger, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4947 and (202) 482-2057, respectively.
FR Citation83 FR 57421 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR