83 FR 60363 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 227 (November 26, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 227 (November 26, 2018)
| Page Range | 60363-60366 | |
| FR Document | 2018-25556 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 60363-60366] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-25556] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0598; FRL-9986-76-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving Maryland's regional haze progress report, submitted on August 9, 2017, as a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). Maryland's SIP revision addresses Clean Air Act (CAA) provisions and EPA regulations that require each state to submit periodic reports describing the State's progress towards reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established for regional haze and to make a determination of the adequacy of the State's existing regional haze SIP. The EPA is approving Maryland's determination that the State's regional haze SIP is adequate to meet the RPGs for the first implementation period. DATES: This final rule is effective on December 26, 2018. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0598. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Trouba, (215) 814-2023, or by email at trouba.erin@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Under the Regional Haze Rule, each state was required to submit to EPA an implementation plan addressing regional haze visibility impairment for the first implementation period through 2018, and then was required to submit [[Page 60364]] a progress report in the form of a SIP revision that evaluates progress towards the RPGs set for each mandatory Class I Federal area within the state and for each mandatory Class I Federal area outside the state which may be affected by emissions from within the state. 40 CFR 51.308(g). Each state is also required to submit, at the same time as the progress report, a determination of the adequacy of its existing regional haze SIP. 40 CFR 51.308(h). The first progress report SIP is due five years after submittal of the initial regional haze SIP. On February 13, 2012, Maryland submitted the State's first regional haze SIP in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308. The progress report SIP was submitted by Maryland, through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), on August 9, 2017. On August 27, 2018 (83 FR 43571), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in which EPA proposed approval of Maryland's regional haze 5- year progress report SIP, a report on progress made in the first implementation period towards RPGs for Class I areas outside the State that are affected by emissions from Maryland's sources. Because there are no Class I areas in Maryland, the State did not need to address progress towards RPGs for Class I areas ``inside'' the State. This progress report SIP also included the State's determination that its existing regional haze SIP requires no substantive revision to achieve the established regional haze visibility improvement and emissions reduction goals for 2018. II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis Maryland's regional haze 5-year progress report SIP submittal (2017 Progress Report) addresses the required elements for progress reports under the provisions of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and includes a determination that the State's existing regional haze SIP requires no substantive revision to achieve the established regional haze visibility improvement and emissions reduction goals for 2018 as required by 40 CFR 51.308(h). In the NPRM, EPA proposed to approve the 2017 Progress Report because EPA found that the 2017 Progress Report addressed the elements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) regarding progress implementing the approved regional haze SIP and discussed visibility improvement in Class I areas impacted by Maryland's emissions. The detailed rationale for EPA's action is explained in the NPRM and will not be restated here. In addition, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.308(h), states are required to submit, at the same time as the progress report submission, a determination of the adequacy of their existing regional haze SIP. In the 2017 Progress Report, Maryland declared that its existing regional haze SIP required no substantive revision to achieve the RPGs for Class I areas. As explained in detail in the NPRM, EPA concluded Maryland adequately addressed 40 CFR 51.308(h) because decreasing emissions of visibility impairing pollutants and progress of regional Class I areas towards RPGs for 2018 indicate that no further revisions to Maryland's SIP are necessary for this first regional haze implementation period. Therefore, EPA concluded the 2017 Progress Report met the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(h). III. Summary of Public Comments and EPA's Response One public comment was received on the NPRM. A summary of the comment and EPA's response are provided in this section. The comment is provided in the docket for this final rulemaking action. Comment: The commenter stated Maryland's plan does not adequately address regional haze progress, alleged that the State's electric generating units (EGUs) did not reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) emissions by ninety percent (90%), and alleged a pulp mill and EGU in Maryland continue to emit large amounts of SO2 . The commenter stated Maryland's BART (Best Available Retrofit Technology) determinations were and continue to be inadequate. The commenter stated Maryland's sulfur fuel oil limits are not low and asked EPA to compare Maryland's limits to other states. Response: EPA reviewed Maryland's 2017 Progress Report against the requirements for progress reports in 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h). EPA found the 2017 Progress Report evaluated progress towards the RPGs and determined that the existing Maryland regional haze SIP is adequate to meet those RPGs because the 2017 Progress Report showed decreasing emissions of visibility impairing pollutants and significant progress of regional Class I areas to meeting or exceeding RPGs for 2018. Maryland's 2017 Progress Report documented emission reductions from point source, non-road, on-road, and area source sectors. Thus, EPA agreed with Maryland's determination that no further revisions to Maryland's SIP are necessary for this first regional haze implementation period. 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1) requires progress reports to contain a description of the status of implementation of all measures included in the implementation plan for achieving RPGs for Class I areas. One implementation measure that is required to be described in the progress report is the implementation of BART. As stated in the NPRM and in the 2017 Progress Report, Maryland discussed the implementation of BART at EGUs and at Holcim Cement and Luke Pulp and Paper Mill. The adequacy of these measures as BART was determined by EPA when EPA approved the Maryland regional haze SIP in 2012. 77 FR 39938 (July 6, 2012). Nothing in the CAA or in 40 CFR 51.308(g) or (h) requires Maryland or EPA to reexamine the BART determinations when reviewing a progress report. In addition, in the 2017 Progress Report, Maryland addressed the implementation of the Healthy Air Act (HAA) which was a measure employed by Maryland for its regional haze SIP to achieve a 90% reduction of SO2 from coal-fired EGUs within the State to address RPGs for Class I areas impacted by Maryland and to address BART for those eligible EGUs. For a discussion of the HAA as the approved BART-alternative for EGUs in Maryland, see EPA's approval of the Maryland regional haze SIP at 77 FR 39938. In the 2017 Progress Report, Maryland included SO2 emissions data for EGUs demonstrating reductions from the HAA as well as from other SO2 reducing regulations. Therefore, as a factual matter, EPA disagrees with the commenter that Maryland did not reduce SO2 emissions by 90% from EGUs to meet the regional haze SIP measures. Maryland also discussed the implementation of BART within the State and thus met requirements for progress reports in 40 CFR 51.308. The commenter provided no information that Maryland had not implemented BART as approved by EPA.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ In June 2012, EPA approved BART emission limits for power boiler 25, a BART subject source, at the Verso Luke Paper Mill. 77 FR 39938 (June 13, 2012). In July 2017, EPA removed the previously approved BART requirements for SO2 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from power boiler 25 (No. 25) and replaced them with new, alternative emission requirements as BART. EPA established an annual SO2 cap for power boiler 25 and approved alternative BART emission limits for SO2 and NOx for power boiler 24 (No. 24). 82 FR 35451 (July 31, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding the commenter's concern about fuel sulfur limits, EPA addressed Maryland's fuel sulfur requirements in the approval of Maryland's regional haze SIP. As EPA stated when proposing to approve Maryland's regional haze SIP, since Maryland has not adopted a low sulfur fuel oil strategy, the State has a deficiency of 7,473.4 tons per year (tpy) of SO2 emissions. However, Maryland has a [[Page 60365]] surplus of SO2 emission reductions of 57,552 tpy resulting from the HAA. This surplus accounts for the SO2 emission reductions needed to meet the requirements of the low sulfur fuel strategy. 77 FR 11827, 11835 (Feb. 28, 2012). As EPA approved Maryland's regional haze SIP without Maryland having a low sulfur fuel strategy as a measure for its SIP, whether or not Maryland has such a strategy now implemented, and whether any sulfur fuel requirements Maryland has are less stringent than other states, are not relevant or appropriate considerations before EPA in evaluating the 2017 Progress Report. 40 CFR 51.308(g) relates to discussion of the implementation of measures approved into a state's regional haze SIP. Thus, the 2017 Progress Report did not need to address any sulfur fuel requirements as those are not part of the Maryland regional haze SIP. As EPA found Maryland addressed its progress towards meeting RPGs in Class I areas impacted by Maryland emissions and addressed visibility improvement from measures in the Maryland SIP, EPA is approving the 2017 Progress Report as addressing 40 CFR 51.308(g). IV. Final Action EPA is approving Maryland's 2017 Progress Report submitted on August 9, 2017, as meeting the applicable regional haze requirements set forth in 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h) as well as CAA section 110 requirements for SIPs. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 25, 2019. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action to approve Maryland's regional haze 5-year progress report SIP revision may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: November 13, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart V--Maryland 0 2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the entry for ``Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * [[Page 60366]] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable State Additional revision geographic area submittal date EPA approval date explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Statewide.......... 8/09/2017 11/26/2018, [Insert Report. Federal Register citation]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2018-25556 Filed 11-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 60363
agreement. . . .’’ 17 U.S.C. § 384.3 Royalty fees for ephemeral ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
801(b)(7)(A)(i). Participants in the recordings. AGENCY
proceeding may also ‘‘object to [the (a) Basic royalty rate. (1) For the
agreement’s] adoption as a basis for 40 CFR Part 52
making of any number of Ephemeral
statutory terms and rates.’’ Id. Recordings in the operation of a [EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0598; FRL–9986–76–
The Judges ‘‘may decline to adopt the Business Establishment Service, a Region 3]
agreement as a basis for statutory terms Licensee shall pay a royalty equal to the
and rates for participants that are not Approval and Promulgation of Air
following percentages of such Licensee’s
parties to the agreement,’’ only ‘‘if any Quality Implementation Plans;
‘‘Gross Proceeds’’ derived from the use Maryland; Regional Haze Five-Year
participant [in the proceeding] objects to in such service of musical programs that
the agreement and the [Judges] Progress Report
are attributable to copyrighted
conclude, based on the record before AGENCY: Environmental Protection
recordings:
them if one exists, that the agreement Agency (EPA).
does not provide a reasonable basis for
Rate ACTION: Final rule.
setting statutory terms or rates.’’ 17 Year %
U.S.C. 801(b)(7)(A)(ii). Accordingly, on SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
May 17, 2018, the Judges published a 2019 .............................................. 12.5 Agency (EPA) is approving Maryland’s
document requesting comment on the 2020 .............................................. 12.75 regional haze progress report, submitted
proposed rates and terms. 83 FR 22907. 2021 .............................................. 13.0 on August 9, 2017, as a revision to its
The Judges received no timely 2022 .............................................. 13.25 State Implementation Plan (SIP).
comments or objections in response to 2023 .............................................. 13.5 Maryland’s SIP revision addresses Clean
the May 17 document. Air Act (CAA) provisions and EPA
Having received no opposition to the (2) ‘‘Gross Proceeds’’ as used in this regulations that require each state to
proposal and finding that the agreement section means all fees and payments, submit periodic reports describing the
among the moving parties provides a including those made in kind, received State’s progress towards reasonable
reasonable basis for setting statutory from any source before, during or after progress goals (RPGs) established for
terms and rates, the Judges, by this the License Period that are derived from regional haze and to make a
notice, adopt as final regulations the the use of copyrighted sound recordings determination of the adequacy of the
rates and terms for the making of an during the License Period pursuant to State’s existing regional haze SIP. The
ephemeral recording by a business 17 U.S.C. 112(e) for the sole purpose of EPA is approving Maryland’s
establishment service for the period facilitating a transmission to the public determination that the State’s regional
January 1, 2019, through December 31, of a performance of a sound recording haze SIP is adequate to meet the RPGs
2023. under the limitation on exclusive rights for the first implementation period.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 384 specified in 17 U.S.C. 114(d)(1)(C)(iv). DATES: This final rule is effective on
The attribution of Gross Proceeds to December 26, 2018.
Copyright, Digital audio copyrighted recordings may be made on ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
transmissions, Ephemeral recordings, docket for this action under Docket ID
the basis of:
Performance right, Sound recordings. Number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0598. All
(i) For classical programs, the
Final Regulations documents in the docket are listed on
proportion that the playing time of
the https://www.regulations.gov
For the reasons set forth in the copyrighted classical recordings bears to
website. Although listed in the index,
preamble, the Judges amend part 384 of the total playing time of all classical some information is not publicly
chapter III of title 37 of the Code of recordings in the program; and available, e.g., confidential business
Federal Regulations as follows: (ii) For all other programs, the information (CBI) or other information
proportion that the number of whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
PART 384—RATES AND TERMS FOR copyrighted recordings bears to the total Certain other material, such as
THE MAKING OF EPHEMERAL copyrighted material, is not placed on
number of all recordings in the program.
RECORDINGS BY BUSINESS the internet and will be publicly
ESTABLISHMENT SERVICES * * * * *
available only in hard copy form.
§ 384.5 [Amended] Publicly available docket materials are
■ 1. The authority citation for part 384 available through https://
continues to read as follows: ■ 4. In § 384.5, amend paragraph (d)(4) www.regulations.gov, or please contact
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 112(e), 801(b)(1). by removing the second comma before the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
the word ‘‘subject’’. INFORMATION CONTACT section for
§ 384.1 [Amended]
Dated: September 17, 2018. additional availability information.
■ 2. In § 384.1, amend paragraph (a) by David R. Strickler, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
removing ‘‘January 1, 2014, through Copyright Royalty Judge. Trouba, (215) 814–2023, or by email at
December 31, 2018’’ and adding Jesse M. Feder, trouba.erin@epa.gov.
‘‘January 1, 2019, through December 31, Copyright Royalty Judge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2023’’ in its place.
Suzanne M. Barnett, I. Background
■ 3. Amend § 384.3 by: Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
Under the Regional Haze Rule, each
■ a. Revising paragraph (a); and
Carla D. Hayden, state was required to submit to EPA an
■ b. In paragraph (b), removing implementation plan addressing
Librarian of Congress.
‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘$20,000’’ in its regional haze visibility impairment for
[FR Doc. 2018–25458 Filed 11–23–18; 8:45 am]
place. the first implementation period through
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
The revision reads as follows: 2018, and then was required to submit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Nov 23, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM 26NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_60590/page/1.svg)
![60366 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Name of non-regulatory SIP State submittal
Applicable geographic area EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision date
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze Five-Year Statewide ............................... 8/09/2017 11/26/2018, [Insert Federal
Progress Report. Register citation].
[FR Doc. 2018–25556 Filed 11–23–18; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information not marked confidential
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
I. General Information
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
A. Does this action apply to me? notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION You may be potentially affected by objection or hearing request, identified
AGENCY this action if you are an agricultural by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
producer, food manufacturer, or 2011–0971, by one of the following
40 CFR Part 180 methods:
pesticide manufacturer. The following
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0971; FRL–9977–14] list of North American Industrial • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
Classification System (NAICS) codes is www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Pyrifluquinazon; Pesticide Tolerances not intended to be exhaustive, but rather instructions for submitting comments.
provides a guide to help readers Do not submit electronically any
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
determine whether this document information you consider to be CBI or
Agency (EPA).
applies to them. Potentially affected other information whose disclosure is
ACTION: Final rule.
entities may include: restricted by statute.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
tolerances for residues of • Animal production (NAICS code Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
pyrifluquinazon in or on multiple 112). DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
commodities that are identified and • Food manufacturing (NAICS code NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
discussed later in this document. 311). • Hand Delivery: To make special
Nichino America, Inc. requested these • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS arrangements for hand delivery or
tolerances under the Federal Food, code 32532). delivery of boxed information, please
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). follow the instructions at http://
B. How can I get electronic access to www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
DATES: This regulation is effective other related information? Additional instructions on
November 26, 2018. Objections and commenting or visiting the docket,
You may access a frequently updated
requests for hearings must be received along with more information about
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
on or before January 25, 2019, and must dockets generally, is available at http://
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
be filed in accordance with the www.epa.gov/dockets.
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- II. Summary of Petitioned-For
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ Tolerances
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
40tab_02.tpl.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, In the Federal Register of December 9,
identified by docket identification (ID) C. How can I file an objection or hearing 2016 (81 FR 89036) (FRL–9953–69) and
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0971, is request? September 15, 2017 (82 FR 43352)
available at http://www.regulations.gov Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 (FRL–9965–43), EPA issued a document
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) objection to any aspect of this regulation U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing
in the Environmental Protection Agency and may also request a hearing on those of pesticide petitions (PP 6F8502 and PP
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William objections. You must file your objection 7E8578, respectively) by Nichino
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 or request a hearing on this regulation America, Inc., 4550 New Linden Hill
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC in accordance with the instructions Road, Suite 501, Wilmington, DE 19808.
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure The petitions requested that 40 CFR part
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., proper receipt by EPA, you must 180 be amended by establishing
Monday through Friday, excluding legal identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– tolerances for residues of the insecticide
holidays. The telephone number for the OPP–2011–0971 in the subject line on pyrifluquinazon, (1-acetyl-3,4-dihydro-
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, the first page of your submission. All 3-[(3-pyridinylmethyl)amino]-6-[1,2,2,2-
and the telephone number for the OPP objections and requests for a hearing tetrafluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl]-
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review must be in writing, and must be 2(1H)-quinazolinone), as follows: PP
the visitor instructions and additional received by the Hearing Clerk on or 6F8502 requested tolerances for
information about the docket available before January 25, 2019. Addresses for residues in or on Almond, hulls at 0.4
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. mail and hand delivery of objections parts per million (ppm); Brassica head
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and hearing requests are provided in 40 and stem vegetables (crop group 5–16)
Michael Goodis, Director, Registration CFR 178.25(b). at 0.4 ppm; Cattle, fat at 0.01 ppm;
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide In addition to filing an objection or Cattle, meat at 0.01 ppm; Cattle, meat
Programs, Environmental Protection hearing request with the Hearing Clerk byproducts at 0.01 ppm; Citrus fruits
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, as described in 40 CFR part 178, please (crop group 10–10) at 0.5 ppm; Citrus,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main submit a copy of the filing (excluding oil at 14 ppm; Cotton, gin byproducts at
telephone number: (703) 305–7090; any Confidential Business Information 4.0 ppm; Cotton, undelinted seed at 0.2
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. ppm; Cucurbit vegetables (crop group 9)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Nov 23, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM 26NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_60590/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-24 00:52:16
Document Modified: 2018-11-24 00:52:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on December 26, 2018. | |
| Contact | Erin Trouba, (215) 814-2023, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 60363 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR