83 FR 63619 - Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 237 (December 11, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 237 (December 11, 2018)
| Page Range | 63619-63621 | |
| FR Document | 2018-26774 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 63619-63621] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-26774] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016- 2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2017. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Kennedy or Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-7883 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. Imports of the product are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2016-2017,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in Commerce's Central Records Unit, located at Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Preliminary Results of Administrative Review We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping [[Page 63620]] margins exist for the respondents for the period November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aju Besteel................................................. 10.56 Bookook Steel............................................... 10.56 Chang Won Bending........................................... 10.56 Dae Ryung................................................... 10.56 Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (Dsme)............. 10.56 Daiduck Piping.............................................. 10.56 Dong Yang Steel Pipe........................................ 10.56 Dongbu Steel................................................ 10.56 Eew Korea Company........................................... 10.56 Histeel..................................................... 10.56 Husteel..................................................... 12.65 Hyundai Rb.................................................. 10.56 Hyundai Steel (Pipe Divison)................................ 10.56 Hyundai Steel Company....................................... 8.47 Kiduck Industries........................................... 10.56 Kum Kang Kind............................................... 10.56 Kumsoo Connecting........................................... 10.56 Miju Steel Mfg.............................................. 10.56 Nexteel..................................................... 10.56 Samkang M&T................................................. 10.56 Seah Fs..................................................... 10.56 Seah Steel.................................................. 10.56 Steel Flower................................................ 10.56 Vesta Co., Ltd.............................................. 10.56 Ycp Co...................................................... 10.56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days after public announcement of the preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\2\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Commerce will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\5\ If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of reviews, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \6\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel Co., Ltd. or Hyundai Steel Company for which they did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For the 23 companies which were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by these firms. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this review for all shipments of CWP from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be the rates established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent,\7\ the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: December 3, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination [[Page 63621]] V. Discussion of the Methodology (1) Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis VI. Date of Sale VII. Product Comparisons VIII. Constructed Export Price IX. Normal Value A. Particular Market Situation B. Comparison Market Viability C. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test D. Level of Trade/CEP Offset E. Overrun Sales F. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test G. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices X. Currency Conversion XI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-26774 Filed 12-10-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices 63619
submitted and, if the information is and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018.
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
factual information already on the data; and (5) quantity and value Mark Kennedy or Peter Zukowski, AD/
record, to provide an explanation questionnaires. Under certain CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
identifying the information already on circumstances, Commerce may elect to and Compliance, International Trade
the record that the factual information specify a different time limit by which Administration, U.S. Department of
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The extension requests will be considered Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also untimely for submissions which are due NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
provide specific time limits for such from multiple parties simultaneously. In (202) 482–7883 or (202) 482–0189,
factual submissions based on the type of such a case, Commerce will inform respectively.
factual information being submitted. parties in the letter or memorandum SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Please review the final rule, available at setting forth the deadline (including a
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ specified time) by which extension Scope of the Order
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to requests must be filed to be considered The merchandise subject to the order
submitting factual information in this timely. This modification also requires is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
segment. that an extension request must be made and tube. Imports of the product are
Any party submitting factual in a separate, stand-alone submission, currently classifiable in the Harmonized
information in an antidumping duty or and clarifies the circumstances under Tariff Schedule of the United States
countervailing duty proceeding must which Commerce will grant untimely- (HTSUS) under subheadings
certify to the accuracy and completeness filed requests for the extension of time 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
of that information.10 Parties are hereby limits. These modifications are effective 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
reminded that revised certification for all segments initiated on or after 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
requirements are in effect for company/ October 21, 2013. Please review the 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS
government officials as well as their final rule, available at http:// subheadings are provided for
representatives. All segments of any www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ convenience and customs purposes, the
antidumping duty or countervailing html/2013-22853.htm, prior to written description is dispositive. A full
duty proceedings initiated on or after submitting factual information in these description of the scope of the order is
August 16, 2013, should use the formats segments. contained in the Preliminary Decision
for the revised certifications provided at These initiations and this notice are Memorandum.1
the end of the Final Rule.11 Commerce in accordance with section 751(a) of the
intends to reject factual submissions in Methodology
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
any proceeding segments if the 351.221(c)(1)(i). Commerce conducted this review in
submitting party does not comply with accordance with section 751 of the
Dated: December 6, 2018.
applicable revised certification Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
requirements. James Maeder, Constructed export price is calculated in
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Extension of Time Limits Regulation Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Normal value is calculated in
Parties may request an extension of Operations performing the duties of Deputy
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
time limits before a time limit Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
For a full description of the
established under Part 351 expires, or as methodology underlying our
otherwise specified by the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–26773 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am]
conclusions, see the Preliminary
See 19 CFR 351.302. In general, an BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Decision Memorandum. The
extension request will be considered Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
untimely if it is filed after the time limit public document and is made available
established under Part 351 expires. For DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
to the public via Enforcement and
submissions which are due from International Trade Administration Compliance’s Antidumping and
multiple parties simultaneously, an Countervailing Duty Centralized
extension request will be considered [A–580–809] Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on ACCESS is available to registered users
the due date. Examples include, but are Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe at http://access.trade.gov and to all
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal From the Republic of Korea: parties in Commerce’s Central Records
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Unit, located at Room B8024 of the main
(2) factual information to value factors Duty Administrative Review; 2016– Department of Commerce building. In
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 2017 addition, a complete version of the
the adequacy of remuneration under 19 Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 be found at http://enforcement.
International Trade Administration,
CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, trade.gov/frn/index.html.
Department of Commerce.
clarification and correction filed
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Preliminary Results of Administrative
comments concerning the selection of a (Commerce) preliminarily determines Review
surrogate country and surrogate values that the producers/exporters subject to We preliminarily determine that the
this review made sales of circular following weighted-average dumping
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
10 See section 782(b) of the Act. welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
11 See Certification of Factual Information To the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less 1 For a full description of the scope of the order,
Import Administration During Antidumping and than normal value during the period of see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July review (POR) November 1, 2016, Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
through October 31, 2017. Interested Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2016–2017,’’
http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ parties are invited to comment on these dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. preliminary results. this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63856/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices 63621
V. Discussion of the Methodology the Sultanate of Oman.1 This review Decision Memorandum and the
(1) Comparisons to Normal Value covers one producer/exporter of the electronic version of the Preliminary
A. Determination of Comparison Method subject merchandise, Al Jazeera Steel Decision Memorandum are identical in
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Products Co. SAOG (Al Jazeera). For a content.
Analysis
detailed description of the events that
VI. Date of Sale Preliminary Results of the Review
VII. Product Comparisons followed the initiation of this review,
VIII. Constructed Export Price see the Preliminary Decision We preliminarily determine that, for
IX. Normal Value Memorandum, dated concurrently with the period of June 8, 2016, through
A. Particular Market Situation these preliminary results and hereby November 30, 2017, the following
B. Comparison Market Viability adopted by this notice.2 weighted-average dumping margin
C. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s- exists:
Length Test Scope of the Order
D. Level of Trade/CEP Offset The merchandise subject to the Weighted-
E. Overrun Sales Order 3 is CWP from Oman. A full average
F. Cost of Production Exporter/producer dumping
description of the scope of the Order is margin
1. Calculation of Cost of Production contained in the Preliminary Decision (percent)
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
Memorandum.
Al Jazeera Steel Products
G. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Methodology Co. SAOG ......................... 3.84
Comparison Market Prices
X. Currency Conversion Commerce is conducting this review
XI. Recommendation in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) Disclosure, Public Comment, and
and (a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Opportunity To Request a Hearing
[FR Doc. 2018–26774 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am]
amended (the Act). Export price was We intend to disclose the calculations
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
calculated in accordance with section performed for these preliminary results
772 of the Act. NV was calculated in of review to interested parties within
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE accordance with section 773 of the Act. five days of the date of publication of
For a full description of the this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
International Trade Administration methodology underlying our 351.224(b). Interested parties may
conclusions, see the Preliminary submit case briefs to Commerce no later
Decision Memorandum. A list of the than 30 days after the date of
[A–523–812]
topics included in the Preliminary publication of this notice.4 Rebuttal
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Decision Memorandum is included as briefs, limited to issues raised in the
Pipe From the Sultanate of Oman: an appendix to this notice. The case briefs, may be filed not later than
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a five days after the date for filing case
Duty Administrative Review; 2016– public document and is on file briefs.5 Pursuant to 19 CFR
2017 electronically via Enforcement and 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
Compliance’s Antidumping and submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Countervailing Duty Centralized this proceeding are encouraged to
International Trade Administration, Electronic Service System (ACCESS). submit with each argument: (1) A
Department of Commerce. ACCESS is available to registered users statement of the issue; (2) a brief
at http://access.trade.gov, and to all summary of the argument; and (3) a
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce parties in the Central Records Unit,
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that table of authorities.6 Case and rebuttal
room B8024 of the main Department of briefs should be filed using ACCESS.7
circular welded carbon-quality steel Commerce building. In addition, a
pipe (CWP) from the Sultanate of Oman Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
complete version of the Preliminary interested parties who wish to request a
(Oman) has been sold in the United Decision Memorandum can be accessed
States at prices below normal value hearing must submit a written request to
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
(NV) during the period of review (POR), index.html. The signed Preliminary
June 8, 2016, through November 30, and Compliance, filed electronically via
2017. We invite interested parties to 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
ACCESS. An electronically-filed
comment on these preliminary results. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
document must be received successfully
8058 (February 23, 2018). in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m.
DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Eastern Standard Time within 30 days
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty after the date of publication of this
Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon-
Dennis McClure or Robert Palmer, AD/ Quality Steel Pipe from the Sultanate of Oman;
notice. Requests should contain: (1) The
CVD Operations, Office VIII, 2016–2017,’’ from James P. Maeder, Jr., Associate party’s name, address, and telephone
Enforcement and Compliance, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and number; (2) the number of participants;
International Trade Administration, Countervailing Duty Operations performing the (3) whether any participant is a foreign
duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, national; and (4) a list of issues parties
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for intend to discuss. Issues raised in the
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5973 or Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, hearing will be limited to those raised
performing the non-exclusive functions and duties in the respective case and rebuttal
(202) 482–9068, respectively. of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Compliance, dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision the Department intends to hold the
Background Memorandum). hearing at the U.S. Department of
3 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
On February 23, 2018, Commerce From the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the 4 See
United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
initiated the antidumping duty 5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Antidumping Duty Determination and
administrative review on circular Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
welded carbon-quality steel pipe from 19, 2016) (the Order). 7 See 19 CFR 351.303.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63856/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-11 01:06:42
Document Modified: 2018-12-11 01:06:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 11, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mark Kennedy or Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-7883 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 63619 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR