83 FR 63622 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 237 (December 11, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 237 (December 11, 2018)
| Page Range | 63622-63624 | |
| FR Document | 2018-26770 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 63622-63624] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-26770] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-844] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Grupo Simec made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2017, period of review (POR), and Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero) did not. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore (Deacero) or Patricia Tran (Grupo Simec), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3692 or (202) 482-1503, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 11, 2018, pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 1329 (January 11, 2018) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 63623]] On March 13, 2018, we selected Deacero and Grupo Simec as mandatory respondents.\2\ On July 12, 2018, we issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of the instant administrative review from August 6, 2018 to December 3, 2018.\3\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum, titled ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2016-2017, Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination,'' dated March 13, 2018. \3\ See Memorandum, titled ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2016-2017 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2016-2017'' dated July 12, 2018. The memorandum incorrectly stated that the deadline is December 4, 2018; the actual deadline is December 3, 2018. \4\ See memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico, 2016-2017,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Act. Export and constructed export price were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 3.70 percent for Grupo Simec and a de minimis margin for Deacero for the period November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we assigned the weighted-average dumping margin of 3.70 percent calculated for Grupo Simec to the nine non-selected companies in these preliminary results, as referenced below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted-average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V............................... * 0.00 Grupo Simec (Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V., Orge 3.70 S.A. de C.V., Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V., Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V., Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V., Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.) \6\..... Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V.......................... 3.70 ArcelorMittal Lazaro Cardenas S.A. de C.V............ 3.70 Cia Siderurgica De California, S.A. de C.V........... 3.70 AceroMex S.A......................................... 3.70 ArcelorMittal Celaya................................. 3.70 ArcelorMittal Cordoba S.A. de C.V.................... 3.70 Siderurgica Tultitlan S.A. de C.V.................... 3.70 Talleres y Aceros, S.A. de C.V....................... 3.70 Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V.......................... 3.70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * (de minimis). Assessment Rate --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Commerce previously collapsed Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V. and Orge S.A. de C.V. with Grupo Simec. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 27233 (June 14, 2017). In this administrative review, Commerce has preliminarily collapsed Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V., Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V., Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V., Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V. Industrias CH is affiliated with Grupo Simec but Commerce is not collapsing the company into the single entity. See Grupo Simec Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum dated December 3, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for Deacero or Grupo Simec is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ If the weighted- average dumping margin for Deacero or Grupo Simec is zero or de minimis in the final results, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero [[Page 63624]] or de minimis in the final results, we will instruct CBP not to assess antidumping duties on any of their entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). (Final Modification for Reviews). \8\ Id. at 8102. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(I), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed in these preliminary results to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\11\ However, Commerce intends to issue a supplemental questionnaire to Grupo Simec after the preliminary results. Thus, Commerce will subsequently notify parties of the case brief and rebuttal brief deadlines. Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\12\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the established deadline. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. We intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: December 3, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Margin for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination V. Affiliation and Collapsing VI. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences A. Legal Standard for Facts Available and Adverse Inferences B. Application of Partial Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Deacero C. Selection of AFA Rate VII. Discussion of Methodology A. Comparisons to Normal Value 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis B. Product Comparisons C. Date of Sale D. Constructed Export Price E. Normal Value 1. Home Market Viability 2. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis a. Calculation of Cost of Production b. Test of Comparison Market Prices c. Results of COP Test F. Level of Trade G. Sales to Affiliated Customers H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices I. Currency Conversions VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-26770 Filed 12-10-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![63622 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue subject merchandise entered, or A. Determination of the Comparison
NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time withdrawn from warehouse, for Method
and date to be determined.8 Parties consumption on or after the publication B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
should confirm by telephone the date, date of the final results of this C. Date of Sale
time, and location of the hearing two administrative review, as provided by D. Product Comparisons
days before the scheduled date. section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The E. Export Price
We intend to issue the final results of cash deposit rate for Al Jazeera will be F. Normal Value
this administrative review, including the rate established in the final results 1. Home Market Viability
the results of its analysis of issues raised of this review; (2) for previously 2. Level of Trade
in any written briefs, not later than 120 reviewed or investigated companies not 3. Cost of Production Analysis
days after the date of publication of this i. Cost Averaging Methodology
participating in this review, the cash
ii. Calculation of COP
notice, unless the deadline is extended.9 deposit rate will continue to be the iii. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
Assessment Rates company-specific rate published for the iv. Results of the COP Test
most recently-completed segment of this 4. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Upon issuance of the final results, proceeding in which the company was Comparison Market Prices
Commerce shall determine, and U.S. reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm V. Currency Conversion
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) covered in this review, a prior review, VI. Recommendation
shall assess, antidumping duties on all or the less-than-fair value (LTFV) [FR Doc. 2018–26775 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am]
appropriate entries covered by this investigation, but the manufacturer is, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
review.10 the cash deposit rate will be the rate
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), as established for the most recently-
Al Jazeera reported the entered value for completed segment of this proceeding DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
its U.S. sales, we calculated importer- for the manufacturer of subject
specific ad valorem duty assessment merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit International Trade Administration
rates based on the ratio of the total rate for all other manufacturers or [A–201–844]
amount of dumping calculated for the exporters will continue to be 7.36
examined sales to the total entered percent, the all-others rate established Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
value of the sales. Where the in the LTFV investigation.12 These cash Mexico: Preliminary Results of
respondent’s weighted-average dumping deposit requirements, when imposed, Antidumping Duty Administrative
margin is zero or de minimis within the shall remain in effect until further Review; 2016–2017
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an notice.
importer-specific rate is zero or de AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
minimis, we will instruct CBP to Notification To Importers International Trade Administration,
liquidate the appropriate entries Department of Commerce.
This notice serves as a preliminary SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
without regard to antidumping duties. reminder to importers of their
We intend to instruct CBP to take into (Commerce) preliminarily determines
responsibility under 19 CFR that Grupo Simec made sales of subject
account the ‘‘provisional measures 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
deposit cap,’’ in accordance with 19 merchandise at less than normal value
regarding the reimbursement of during the November 1, 2016, through
CFR 351.212(d). antidumping duties prior to liquidation
The final results of this review shall October 31, 2017, period of review
of the relevant entries during this POR. (POR), and Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V.
be the basis for the assessment of Failure to comply with this requirement
antidumping duties on entries of (Deacero) did not. We invite interested
could result in the Secretary’s parties to comment on these preliminary
merchandise covered by the final results presumption that reimbursement of
of this review and for future deposits of results.
antidumping duties occurred and the DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018.
estimated duties, where applicable. subsequent assessment of doubled
In accordance with our ‘‘automatic FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
antidumping duties.
assessment’’ practice, for entries of Stephanie Moore (Deacero) or Patricia
subject merchandise during the POR Notification To Interested Parties Tran (Grupo Simec), AD/CVD
produced by Al Jazeera for which it did The preliminary results of review are Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
not know its merchandise was destined issued and published in accordance Compliance, International Trade
for the United States, we will instruct with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of Administration, U.S. Department of
CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
the all-others rate.11 Dated: December 4, 2018. NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone
We intend to issue liquidation Gary Taverman, (202) 482–3692 or (202) 482–1503,
instructions to CBP 15 days after Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping respectively.
publication of the final results of this and Countervailing Duty Operations, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
review. performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for Background
Cash Deposit Requirements Enforcement and Compliance. On January 11, 2018, pursuant to
The following deposit requirements section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of
will be effective for all shipments of the Appendix
1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
initiated an administrative review of the
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Decision Memorandum
9 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
antidumping duty order on steel
I. Summary concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from
351.213(h). II. Background
10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). Mexico.1
III. Scope of the Order
11 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
(May 6, 2003). 12 See the Order. 1329 (January 11, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63859/page/1.svg)
![63624 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices
or de minimis in the final results, we Disclosure responsibility under 19 CFR
will instruct CBP not to assess We intend to disclose the calculations 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
antidumping duties on any of their performed in these preliminary results regarding the reimbursement of
entries in accordance with the Final to parties in this proceeding within five antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Modification for Reviews.8 days of the date of publication of this of the relevant entries during this
In accordance with Commerce’s notice.10 review period. Failure to comply with
assessment practice, for entries of this requirement could result in the
Public Comment
subject merchandise during the POR Secretary’s presumption that
produced by each respondent for which Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), reimbursement of antidumping duties
it did not know that its merchandise interested parties may submit case briefs occurred and increase the subsequent
was destined for the United States, we not later than 30 days after the date of assessment of the antidumping duties.
will instruct CBP to liquidate publication of this notice. Rebuttal
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate briefs, limited to issues raised in the Notification to Interested Parties
if there is no rate for the intermediate case briefs, may be filed no later than
five days after the date for filing case We are issuing and publishing these
company(ies) involved in the results in accordance with sections
transaction. briefs.11 However, Commerce intends to
issue a supplemental questionnaire to 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
We intend to issue instructions to Grupo Simec after the preliminary CFR 351.213(h)(1).
CBP 15 days after publication of the results. Thus, Commerce will Dated: December 3, 2018.
final results of this review. subsequently notify parties of the case Gary Taverman,
Cash Deposit Requirements brief and rebuttal brief deadlines.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Parties who submit case briefs or
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
The following cash deposit rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are performing the non-exclusive functions and
requirements will be effective upon encouraged to submit with each duties of the Assistant Secretary for
publication of the notice of final results argument: (1) A statement of the issue; Enforcement and Compliance.
of administrative review for all (2) a brief summary of the argument;
shipments of subject merchandise and (3) a table of authorities.12 All briefs Appendix
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, must be filed electronically using List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
for consumption on or after the ACCESS. An electronically filed Decision Memorandum
publication of the final results of this document must be received successfully
administrative review, as provided by I. Summary
in its entirety by the established
II. Background
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The deadline.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), III. Scope of the Order
cash deposit rate for respondents noted
interested parties who wish to request a IV. Margin for Companies Not Selected for
above will be the rate established in the
Individual Examination
final results of this administrative hearing, limited to issues raised in the
V. Affiliation and Collapsing
review, except if the rate is less than case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
VI. Application of Facts Available and
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis written request to the Assistant
Adverse Inferences
within the meaning of 19 CFR Secretary for Enforcement and
A. Legal Standard for Facts Available and
351.106(c)(I), in which case the cash Compliance, within 30 days after the
Adverse Inferences
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for date of publication of this notice.
B. Application of Partial Adverse Facts
merchandise exported by producers or Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
Available (AFA) to Deacero
exporters not covered in this name, address, and telephone number; C. Selection of AFA Rate
administrative review but covered in a (2) the number of participants; and (3) VII. Discussion of Methodology
prior segment of the proceeding, the a list of issues to be discussed. If a A. Comparisons to Normal Value
cash deposit rate will continue to be the request for a hearing is made, Commerce 1. Determination of Comparison Method
company-specific rate published for the intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. 2. Results of the Differential Pricing
most recently completed segment of this Department of Commerce, 1401 Analysis
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, B. Product Comparisons
firm covered in this review, a prior DC 20230, at a time and date to be C. Date of Sale
review, or the original investigation, but determined. Parties should confirm by D. Constructed Export Price
the producer is, the cash deposit rate telephone the date, time, and location of E. Normal Value
will be the rate established for the most the hearing two days before the 1. Home Market Viability
recently completed segment of this scheduled date. 2. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
proceeding for the producer of the We intend to issue the final results of a. Calculation of Cost of Production
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash this administrative review, including b. Test of Comparison Market Prices
deposit rate for all other producers or the results of our analysis of the issues c. Results of COP Test
exporters will continue to be 20.58 raised in any written briefs, not later F. Level of Trade
percent, the all-others rate established than 120 days after the date of G. Sales to Affiliated Customers
in the antidumping investigation.9 publication of this notice, pursuant to H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
These cash deposit requirements, when section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Comparison Market Prices
imposed, shall remain in effect until Notification to Importers I. Currency Conversions
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
further notice. VIII. Recommendation
This notice serves as a preliminary
[FR Doc. 2018–26770 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am]
8 Id.at 8102.
reminder to importers of their
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
9 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico:
10 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Value and Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR
2014). 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63859/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-11 01:06:46
Document Modified: 2018-12-11 01:06:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 11, 2018. | |
| Contact | Stephanie Moore (Deacero) or Patricia Tran (Grupo Simec), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3692 or (202) 482-1503, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 63622 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR