83 FR 64110 - Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 239 (December 13, 2018)

Page Range		64110-64112
FR Document		2018-27003

We, NMFS, announce that the Proposed Endangered Species Act (ESA) Recovery Plan for Puget Sound Steelhead (Proposed Plan) is available for public review and comment. The Proposed Plan addresses the Puget Sound Steelhead (Onchorhynchus mykiss) Distinct Population Segment (DPS), which was listed as threatened under the ESA on May 11, 2007. As required under the ESA, the Proposed Plan contains objective, measurable delisting criteria, site-specific management actions necessary to achieve the Proposed Plan's goals, and estimates of the time and cost required to implement recovery actions. We are soliciting review and comment from the public and all interested parties on the Proposed Plan.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64110-64112]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XG573


Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce that the Proposed Endangered Species Act 
(ESA) Recovery Plan for Puget Sound Steelhead (Proposed Plan) is 
available for public review and comment. The Proposed Plan addresses 
the Puget Sound Steelhead (Onchorhynchus mykiss) Distinct Population 
Segment (DPS), which was listed as threatened under the ESA on May 11, 
2007. As required under the ESA, the Proposed Plan contains objective, 
measurable delisting criteria, site-specific management actions 
necessary to achieve the Proposed Plan's goals, and estimates of the 
time and cost required to implement recovery actions. We are soliciting 
review and comment from the public and all interested parties on the 
Proposed Plan.

DATES: Comments on the Proposed Plan must be received by February 11, 
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the Proposed Plan, identified by

[[Page 64111]]

NOAA-NMFS-2018-0125, by either of the following methods:
     Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments on the Proposed Plan via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= NOAA-NMFS-2018-0125. Click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments on the Proposed Plan to 
David Price, National Marine Fisheries Service, 510 Desmond Dr. SE, 
Lacey, WA 98503.
    Instructions: Comments or information sent by any other method, to 
any other address or individual, or received after the end of the 
comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments and 
information received are a part of the public record and will generally 
be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All 
personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), 
confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information 
submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS 
will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if 
you wish to remain anonymous.

    The Proposed Plan is available online at www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= NOAA-NMFS-2018-0125 or upon request from the NMFS 
West Coast Region, Protected Resources Division (see ADDRESSES or FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Price, (360) 753-9598, 
[email protected]; or Elizabeth Babcock, (206) 526-4505, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    We are responsible for developing and implementing recovery plans 
for Pacific salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires 
that recovery plans include, to the extent practicable: (1) Objective, 
measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a determination 
that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-
specific management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and 
(3) estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery 
actions. The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each 
listed species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery.
    We believe it is essential to have local support of recovery plans 
by those whose activities directly affect the listed species and whose 
continued commitment and leadership will be needed to implement the 
necessary recovery actions. We therefore support and participate in 
collaborative efforts to develop recovery plans that involve state, 
tribal, and Federal entities, local communities, and other 
stakeholders. For this Proposed Plan for threatened Puget Sound 
Steelhead, we worked collaboratively with local, state, tribal, and 
Federal partners to produce a recovery plan that satisfies the ESA 
requirements. We have determined that this Proposed ESA Recovery Plan 
for Puget Sound Steelhead meets the statutory requirements for a 
recovery plan and are proposing to adopt it as the ESA recovery plan 
for this threatened species. Section 4(f) of the ESA, as amended in 
1988, requires that public notice and an opportunity for public review 
and comment be provided prior to final approval of a recovery plan. 
This notice solicits comments on this Proposed Plan.

Development of the Proposed Plan

    The geographic area covered by the Proposed Plan is the Puget Sound 
basin, from the Elwha River (inclusive) eastward, including rivers in 
Hood Canal, South Sound, and North Sound, including steelhead from six 
artificial propagation programs: The Green River Natural Program; White 
River Winter Steelhead Supplementation Program; Hood Canal Steelhead 
Supplementation Off-station Projects in the Dewatto, Skokomish, and 
Duckabush Rivers; and the Lower Elwha Fish Hatchery Wild Steelhead 
Recovery Program.
    For the purpose of recovery planning for the ESA-listed species of 
Pacific salmon and steelhead in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, NMFS 
designated five geographically based ``recovery domains.'' The Puget 
Sound Steelhead DPS spawning range is in the Puget Sound domain. For 
each domain, NMFS appointed a team of scientists, nominated for their 
geographic and species expertise, to provide a solid scientific 
foundation for recovery plans. The Puget Sound Steelhead Technical 
Recovery Team included biologists from NMFS, other Federal agencies, 
state agencies, tribes, and academic institutions.
    A primary task for the Puget Sound Steelhead Technical Recovery 
Team was to recommend criteria for determining when each component 
population within a DPS or Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) should 
be considered viable (i.e., when they are have a low risk of extinction 
over a 100-year period) and when ESUs or DPSs have a risk of extinction 
consistent with no longer needing the protections of the ESA. All NMFS' 
Technical Recovery Teams used the same biological principles for 
developing their recommendations; these principles are described in the 
NOAA technical memorandum Viable Salmonid Populations and the Recovery 
of Evolutionarily Significant Units (McElhany et al. 2000). Viable 
salmonid populations (VSP) are defined in terms of four parameters: 
Abundance, productivity or growth rate, spatial structure, and 
diversity.
    We also collaborated with the state of Washington, tribes, other 
Federal agencies, local governments, representatives of industry and 
environmental groups, other stakeholders, and the public to develop the 
Proposed Plan. The Plan for the Puget Sound steelhead DPS was developed 
by NMFS in cooperation with a Recovery Team made up of experts from the 
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Northwest Indian Fisheries 
Commission, Nooksack Tribe, Seattle Light, Long Live the Kings, Puget 
Sound Partnership, and NMFS Northwest Fisheries Science Center. These 
groups provided vital input during the planning process, and their 
continued involvement during recovery plan implementation is critical 
to the success of our joint efforts to recover Puget Sound steelhead.

Contents of Proposed Plan

    The Proposed Plan contains biological background and contextual 
information that includes description of the DPS, the planning area, 
and the context of the plan's development. It presents relevant 
information on DPS structure and guidelines for assessing salmonid 
population and DPS status. It provides background on the natural 
history of steelhead, population status, and threats to their 
sustainability.
    The Puget Sound steelhead DPS consists of three Major Population 
Groups (MPGs) and 32 Demographically Independent Populations (DIPs). 
NMFS based its decision to list the species in 2007 on findings by the 
Puget Sound Steelhead Biological Review Team (Hard et al. 2007). This 
team considered the major risk factors facing Puget Sound steelhead to 
be widespread declines in abundance and productivity for most natural 
steelhead populations in the DPS, including those in Skagit and 
Snohomish Rivers, previously considered strongholds for steelhead in 
the DPS; the low abundance of several summer-run populations; and the 
sharply diminishing abundance of some

[[Page 64112]]

steelhead populations, especially in south Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and 
the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Continued releases of out-of-DPS hatchery 
fish from Skamania-derived summer run were a major concern for 
diversity in the DPS. In 2011, eight years after the ESA-listing 
decision, a status assessment of the DPS by NMFS' Biological Review 
Team found that the status of Puget Sound steelhead regarding risk of 
extinction had not changed (NMFS 2016; 81 FR 33468; May 26, 2016). 
Scientists on the Biological Review Team identified degradation and 
fragmentation of freshwater habitat, with consequential effects on 
connectivity, as the primary limiting factors and threats facing the 
Puget Sound steelhead DPS. They determined that most of the steelhead 
populations within the DPS continued to show downward trends in 
estimated abundance, with a few sharp declines (Ford 2011). Most 
recently, a NMFS species status review (NMFS 2016) concluded that ``The 
biological risks faced by the Puget Sound steelhead DPS have not 
substantively changed since the listing in 2007, or since the 2011 
status review.'' The NMFS review team concluded that the DPS was at 
very low viability, as were all three of its constituent MPGs, and many 
of its 32 DIPs (Hard et al. 2015).
    The Proposed Plan presents NMFS' proposed recovery goals and the 
viability criteria and listing factor criteria for making a delisting 
decision. The proposed viability criteria for the Puget Sound steelhead 
DPS are designed to improve the DPS so it ``has a negligible risk of 
extinction due to threats from demographic variation, local 
environmental variation, and genetic diversity changes over a 100-year 
time frame'' based on the status of the MPGs and DIPs, and supporting 
ecosystems (McElhany et al. 2000). A self-sustaining viable population 
has a negligible risk of extinction due to reasonably foreseeable 
changes in circumstances affecting its abundance, productivity, spatial 
structure, and diversity characteristics and achieves these 
characteristics without dependence upon artificial propagation. The 
proposed viability criteria for Puget Sound steelhead require that all 
three MPGs be viable because the three MPGs differ substantially in key 
biological and habitat characteristics that contribute in distinct ways 
to the overall viability, diversity and spatial structure of the DPS.
    The proposed listing factor criteria are based on the five listing 
factors found in the ESA section 4(a)(1). Before NMFS can remove the 
DPS from protection under the ESA, the factors that led to ESA listing 
need to have been reduced or eliminated to the point where Federal 
protection under the ESA is no longer needed, and there is reasonable 
certainty that the relevant regulatory mechanisms are adequate to 
protect Puget Sound steelhead viability. NMFS listing factor criteria 
for Puget Sound steelhead address pressures from freshwater habitat 
degradation, hatcheries, and other factors that led to the species 
listing and continue to affect its viability.
    The Proposed Plan also describes specific information on the 
following: Current status of Puget Sound steelhead; pressures (limiting 
factors) and threats throughout the life cycle that have contributed to 
the species decline; recovery strategies to address the threats based 
on the best available science; site-specific actions with timelines; 
and a proposed adaptive management framework for focusing needed 
research and evaluations and revising our recovery strategies and 
actions. The Proposed Plan also summarizes time and costs required to 
implement recovery actions.

How NMFS and Others Expect To Use the Plan

    With approval of the final Puget Sound Steelhead recovery plan, we 
will implement the actions in the plan for which we have authority and 
funding; encourage other Federal, state and local agencies and tribal 
governments to implement recovery actions for which they have 
responsibility, authority, and funding; and work cooperatively with 
tribes, the public and local stakeholders on implementation of other 
actions. We expect the recovery plan to guide us and other Federal 
agencies in evaluating Federal actions under ESA section 7, as well as 
in implementing other provisions of the ESA and other statutes. For 
example, the plan will provide greater biological context for 
evaluating the effects that a proposed action may have on the species 
by providing delisting criteria, information on priority areas for 
addressing specific limiting factors, and information on how the DPS 
can tolerate varying levels of risk.
    When we are considering a species for delisting, the agency will 
examine whether the section 4(a)(1) listing factors have been 
addressed. To assist in this examination, we will use the delisting 
criteria described in Chapter 4 of the Proposed Plan, which include 
both viability criteria and listing factor criteria addressing each of 
the ESA section 4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as any other relevant 
data and policy considerations.

Public Comments Solicited

    We are soliciting written comments on the Proposed Plan. All 
substantive comments received by the date specified above will be 
considered and incorporated, as appropriate, prior to our decision 
whether to approve the plan. While we invite comments on all aspects of 
the Proposed Plan, we are particularly interested in comments on the 
proposed strategies and actions, comments on the cost of recovery 
actions, and comments on establishing an appropriate implementation 
forum for the plan. We will issue a news release announcing the 
adoption and availability of the final plan. We will post on the NMFS 
West Coast Region website (www.wcr.noaa.gov) a summary of, and 
responses to, the comments received, along with electronic copies of 
the final plan and its appendices.

Literature Cited

    The complete citations for the references used in this document can 
be obtained by contacting NMFS (see ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT).

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.

    Dated: December 6, 2018.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-27003 Filed 12-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P

64110 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Notices

report which compiles and evaluates DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE discussed, those issues may not be the
potential datasets and recommends subject of formal action during these
which datasets are appropriate for National Oceanic and Atmospheric meetings. Action will be restricted to
assessment analyses, and describes the Administration those issues specifically listed in this
fisheries, evaluates the status of the RIN 0648–XG648 document and any issues arising after
stock, estimates biological benchmarks, publication of this document that
projects future population conditions, Pacific Fishery Management Council; require emergency action under section
and recommends research and Public Meeting 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
monitoring needs. Participants for Conservation and Management Act,
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries provided the public has been notified of
SEDAR Workshops are appointed by the Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and the intent to take final action to address
Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the emergency.
Caribbean Fishery Management Commerce.
Councils and NOAA Fisheries Southeast ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
Special Accommodations
Regional Office, Highly Migratory The meeting is physically accessible
Species Management Division, and SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery to people with disabilities. Requests for
Southeast Fisheries Science Center. Management Council’s (Pacific Council) sign language interpretation or other
Participants include: Data collectors and Groundfish Management Team (GMT) auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr.
database managers; stock assessment will hold a week-long work session that Kris Kleinschmidt at (503) 820–2411, at
scientists, biologists, and researchers; is open to the public. least 10 business days prior to the
constituency representatives including DATES: The GMT meeting will be held meeting date.
fishermen, environmentalists, and non- Monday, January 14, 2019 through Dated: December 10, 2018.
governmental organizations (NGOs); Friday, January 18, 2019. The GMT
Tracey L. Thompson,
international experts; and staff of meeting will begin on Monday, January
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Councils, Commissions, and state and 14, from 1 p.m. until business for the Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
day is completed. The meeting will
federal agencies. [FR Doc. 2018–26982 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am]
reconvene Tuesday, January 15 through
The items of discussion in the Friday, January 18, from 8:30 a.m. until BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Assessment Scoping webinar are as business for each day has been
follows: completed. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Participants will review data and ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
discuss data issues, as necessary, and the Pacific Council Office, Large National Oceanic and Atmospheric
initial modeling issues. Conference Room, 7700 NE Ambassador Administration
Although non-emergency issues not Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220– RIN 0648–XG573
contained in this agenda may come 1384.
before this group for discussion, those FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Endangered and Threatened Species;
issues may not be the subject of formal Todd Phillips, Pacific Council; phone: Recovery Plans
action during this meeting. Action will (503) 820–2426. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
be restricted to those issues specifically SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
identified in this notice and any issues primary purpose of this week-long work Atmospheric Administration,
arising after publication of this notice session is for the GMT to prepare for Commerce.
that require emergency action under 2019 Pacific Council meetings. Specific ACTION: Notice of availability; request
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens agenda items will include: A detailed for comments.
Fishery Conservation and Management review of 2019/20 harvest specifications
Act, provided the public has been and management measure process, SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce that the
notified of the intent to take final action planning for the 2021/22 harvest Proposed Endangered Species Act (ESA)
specifications and management measure Recovery Plan for Puget Sound
to address the emergency.
process, meeting with representatives Steelhead (Proposed Plan) is available
Special Accommodations from the Pacific Council’s Ecosystem for public review and comment. The
Workgroup; consideration of the Proposed Plan addresses the Puget
This meeting is accessible to people groundfish workload prioritization Sound Steelhead (Onchorhynchus
with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary process and Council Operating mykiss) Distinct Population Segment
aids should be directed to the SAFMC Procedure 9, Endangered Species Act (DPS), which was listed as threatened
office (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 salmon mitigation measures, and GMT under the ESA on May 11, 2007. As
business days prior to the meeting. chair/vice chair elections. The GMT required under the ESA, the Proposed
Note: The times and sequence specified in may also address work assigned by the Plan contains objective, measurable
this agenda are subject to change. Pacific Council that relates to delisting criteria, site-specific
groundfish management, such as: A management actions necessary to
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. methodology overview of Sablefish achieve the Proposed Plan’s goals, and
Management and Trawl Allocation estimates of the time and cost required
Dated: December 10, 2018.
Attainment Committee analysis needs to implement recovery actions. We are
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1

Tracey L. Thompson, soliciting review and comment from the
and impact analysis of proposed
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable changes to the directed Pacific halibut public and all interested parties on the
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. fishery on groundfish. A detailed Proposed Plan.
[FR Doc. 2018–26979 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am] agenda will be available on the Pacific DATES: Comments on the Proposed Plan
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P Council’s website prior to the meeting. must be received by February 11, 2019.
Although nonemergency issues not ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
contained in the meeting agenda may be on the Proposed Plan, identified by

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Dec 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1

64112 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Notices

steelhead populations, especially in under the ESA, the factors that led to any other relevant data and policy
south Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and the ESA listing need to have been reduced considerations.
Strait of Juan de Fuca. Continued or eliminated to the point where Federal
Public Comments Solicited
releases of out-of-DPS hatchery fish protection under the ESA is no longer
from Skamania-derived summer run needed, and there is reasonable We are soliciting written comments
were a major concern for diversity in the certainty that the relevant regulatory on the Proposed Plan. All substantive
DPS. In 2011, eight years after the ESA- mechanisms are adequate to protect comments received by the date specified
listing decision, a status assessment of Puget Sound steelhead viability. NMFS above will be considered and
the DPS by NMFS’ Biological Review listing factor criteria for Puget Sound incorporated, as appropriate, prior to
Team found that the status of Puget steelhead address pressures from our decision whether to approve the
Sound steelhead regarding risk of freshwater habitat degradation, plan. While we invite comments on all
extinction had not changed (NMFS hatcheries, and other factors that led to aspects of the Proposed Plan, we are
2016; 81 FR 33468; May 26, 2016). the species listing and continue to affect particularly interested in comments on
Scientists on the Biological Review its viability. the proposed strategies and actions,
Team identified degradation and The Proposed Plan also describes comments on the cost of recovery
fragmentation of freshwater habitat, specific information on the following: actions, and comments on establishing
with consequential effects on Current status of Puget Sound steelhead; an appropriate implementation forum
connectivity, as the primary limiting pressures (limiting factors) and threats for the plan. We will issue a news
factors and threats facing the Puget throughout the life cycle that have release announcing the adoption and
Sound steelhead DPS. They determined contributed to the species decline; availability of the final plan. We will
that most of the steelhead populations recovery strategies to address the threats post on the NMFS West Coast Region
within the DPS continued to show based on the best available science; site- website (www.wcr.noaa.gov) a summary
downward trends in estimated specific actions with timelines; and a of, and responses to, the comments
abundance, with a few sharp declines proposed adaptive management received, along with electronic copies of
(Ford 2011). Most recently, a NMFS framework for focusing needed research the final plan and its appendices.
species status review (NMFS 2016) and evaluations and revising our
concluded that ‘‘The biological risks Literature Cited
recovery strategies and actions. The
faced by the Puget Sound steelhead DPS Proposed Plan also summarizes time The complete citations for the
have not substantively changed since and costs required to implement references used in this document can be
the listing in 2007, or since the 2011 recovery actions. obtained by contacting NMFS (see
status review.’’ The NMFS review team ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
concluded that the DPS was at very low How NMFS and Others Expect To Use INFORMATION CONTACT).
viability, as were all three of its the Plan
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
constituent MPGs, and many of its 32 With approval of the final Puget
DIPs (Hard et al. 2015). Dated: December 6, 2018.
Sound Steelhead recovery plan, we will
The Proposed Plan presents NMFS’ Donna S. Wieting,
implement the actions in the plan for
proposed recovery goals and the Director, Office of Protected Resources,
which we have authority and funding;
viability criteria and listing factor National Marine Fisheries Service.
encourage other Federal, state and local
criteria for making a delisting decision. [FR Doc. 2018–27003 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am]
The proposed viability criteria for the agencies and tribal governments to
implement recovery actions for which BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Puget Sound steelhead DPS are
designed to improve the DPS so it ‘‘has they have responsibility, authority, and
a negligible risk of extinction due to funding; and work cooperatively with
tribes, the public and local stakeholders DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
threats from demographic variation,
local environmental variation, and on implementation of other actions. We National Oceanic and Atmospheric
genetic diversity changes over a 100- expect the recovery plan to guide us and Administration
year time frame’’ based on the status of other Federal agencies in evaluating
the MPGs and DIPs, and supporting Federal actions under ESA section 7, as
RIN 0648–XG668
ecosystems (McElhany et al. 2000). A well as in implementing other
self-sustaining viable population has a provisions of the ESA and other Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico and
negligible risk of extinction due to statutes. For example, the plan will South Atlantic; Southeast Data,
reasonably foreseeable changes in provide greater biological context for Assessment, and Review (SEDAR);
circumstances affecting its abundance, evaluating the effects that a proposed Public Meeting
productivity, spatial structure, and action may have on the species by
diversity characteristics and achieves providing delisting criteria, information AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
these characteristics without on priority areas for addressing specific Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
dependence upon artificial propagation. limiting factors, and information on Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
The proposed viability criteria for Puget how the DPS can tolerate varying levels Commerce.
Sound steelhead require that all three of risk. ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 64 Data
MPGs be viable because the three MPGs When we are considering a species for webinar for Gulf of Mexico and South
differ substantially in key biological and delisting, the agency will examine Atlantic yellowtail snapper.
habitat characteristics that contribute in whether the section 4(a)(1) listing
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1

distinct ways to the overall viability, factors have been addressed. To assist in SUMMARY: The SEDAR 64 assessment
diversity and spatial structure of the this examination, we will use the process of Gulf of Mexico and South
DPS. delisting criteria described in Chapter 4 Atlantic yellowtail snapper will consist
The proposed listing factor criteria are of the Proposed Plan, which include of a Data Workshop, and a series of
based on the five listing factors found in both viability criteria and listing factor assessment webinars, and a Review
the ESA section 4(a)(1). Before NMFS criteria addressing each of the ESA Workshop. See SUPPLEMENTARY
can remove the DPS from protection section 4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as INFORMATION.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Dec 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1

Document Created: 2018-12-13 01:15:55
Document Modified: 2018-12-13 01:15:55

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice of availability; request for comments.
Dates		Comments on the Proposed Plan must be received by February 11, 2019.
Contact		David Price, (360) 753-9598, [email protected]; or Elizabeth Babcock, (206) 526-4505, [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 64110
RIN Number		0648-XG57

83 FR 64110 - Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 239 (December 13, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration