83 FR 64274 - Expansion of the Arroyo Seco Viticultural Area
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 240
(December 14, 2018)
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 240 (December 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 64274-64276 | |
| FR Document | 2018-27014 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 64274-64276] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-27014] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 27 CFR Part 9 [Docket No. TTB-2018-0003; T.D. TTB-153; Ref: Notice No. 172] RIN 1513-AC36 Expansion of the Arroyo Seco Viticultural Area AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding the approximately 18,240-acre ``Arroyo Seco'' viticultural area in Monterey County, California, by approximately 90 acres. The established Arroyo Seco viticultural area and the expansion area both lie within the established Monterey viticultural area and the larger, multi-county Central Coast viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase. DATES: This final rule is effective January 14, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310 G Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 150. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [[Page 64275]] Background on Viticultural Areas TTB Authority Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December 10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the administration and enforcement of this law. Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and lists the approved AVAs. Definition Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape- growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9 of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area. Requirements Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the following:Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established AVA; An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of the proposed expansion area; A narrative description of the features of the proposed expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary; The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion area boundary based on USGS map markings. Petition To Expand the Arroyo Seco AVA TTB received a petition from Ann Hougham, owner of the Mesa del Sol Vineyards, proposing to expand the established ``Arroyo Seco'' AVA. The Arroyo Seco AVA (27 CFR 9.59) was established by T.D. ATF-131, which was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 1983 (48 FR 16245). The Arroyo Seco AVA covers approximately 18,240 acres in Monterey County, California. The proposed expansion area and the established AVA are both located within the Monterey AVA (27 CFR 9.98) and the larger, multi-county Central Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.75). The proposed expansion area contains approximately 90 acres and is adjacent to the far southwestern corner of the established Arroyo Seco AVA. The proposed expansion area is located on an upland terrace on the northern bank of a creek known as the Arroyo Seco, which is Spanish for ``dry creek.'' There is one vineyard covering approximately 14 acres within the proposed expansion area. The petition included a copy of an email from the Arroyo Seco Winegrowers, stating that the proposed expansion was shared with its members and received no objections. Unless otherwise noted, all information and data pertaining to the proposed expansion area contained in this document come from the petition and its supporting exhibits. According to the petition, the soils and topography of the proposed expansion area are similar to those of the established Arroyo Seco AVA. The soils of the proposed expansion area and the established AVA are gravelly and fine sandy loams with low lime and salt content and pH levels between 5.1 and 8.4. The proposed expansion area contains soils primarily from the Lockwood, Elder, and Mocho series, which are all principal soil series within the established Arroyo Seco AVA. Finally, the proposed expansion area and the established AVA are both regions of terraces and alluvial fans with elevations from approximately 600 to 700 feet, and slope angles between 0 and 9 percent. Although the proposed expansion area is more similar to the Arroyo Seco AVA than the surrounding regions, the proposed expansion area still shares some of the features of the surrounding Monterey and Central Coast AVAs. For example, the proposed Arroyo Seco AVA expansion area has moderate elevations and soils with lime, salt, and pH levels similar to the Monterey AVA and shares the marine climate influence of the larger Central Coast AVA due to its proximity to the Pacific Ocean. However, the soils of the proposed expansion area have medium-to-high levels of organic matter, compared to the very low levels of organic matter that characterize the Monterey AVA. Additionally, due to its location east of the Santa Lucas Mountains, the proposed expansion area is not as exposed to the marine air and fog as the more western regions of the Central Coast AVA that are closer to the ocean. Finally, because of its much smaller size, the topographical features of the proposed expansion area are more uniform than the diverse features of the large multicounty Central Coast AVA, and are more similar to the topographical features of the Arroyo Seco AVA, which is located on the same sloping bench lands and terraces along the Arroyo Seco as the proposed expansion area. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received TTB published Notice No. 172 in the Federal Register on Friday, April 6, 2018 (83 FR 14791), proposing to expand the Arroyo Seco AVA. In the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the name, [[Page 64276]] boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed expansion area. For a detailed description of the evidence relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed expansion area, and for a comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed expansion area to the surrounding areas and to the established Arroyo Seco AVA, see Notice No. 172. In Notice No. 172, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in support of the petition. The comment period closed on June 5, 2018. TTB received no comments in response to Notice No. 172. TTB Determination After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence provided by the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates that although the proposed expansion area shares some of the broader characteristics of the larger Monterey and Central Coast AVAs, it is also similar to the established Arroyo Seco AVA and should also be recognized as part of that AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the TTB regulations, TTB expands the 18,240 acre ``Arroyo Seco'' AVA to include the approximately 90-acre expansion area as described in Notice No. 172, effective 30 days from the publication date of this document. Boundary Description See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule. Maps The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed in the regulatory text of 27 CFR 9.59. Impact on Current Wine Labels Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec. 4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986. See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details. The expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will not affect any other existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or ``Central Coast'' as an appellation of origin or in a brand name for wines made from grapes within the ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or ``Central Coast'' AVAs will not be affected by this expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA. The expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will allow vintners to use ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or ``Central Coast'' as an appellation of origin for wines made primarily from grapes grown within the expansion area if the wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation. Regulatory Flexibility Act TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required. Executive Order 12866 It has been determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required. Drafting Information Christopher Forster-Smith of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this final rule. List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 Wine. The Regulatory Amendment For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas 0 2. Section 9.59 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) introductory text and (c)(1), redesignating paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(21) as paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(22), and adding new paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows: Sec. 9.59 Arroyo Seco. * * * * * (c) Boundaries. The Arroyo Seco viticultural area is located in Monterey County, California. The beginning point is found on the ``Sycamore Flat'' U.S.G.S. map at the intersection of Jamesburg Road (known locally as Carmel Valley Road) and Arroyo Seco Road, near the intersection of sections 21, 22, 28, and 27, T.19 S., R. 5 E. From the beginning point, proceed southwesterly along Arroyo Seco Road to its intersection with Piney Creek. (1) Then southeasterly along Piney Creek to its confluence with the Arroyo Seco in section 27, T. 19 S., R. 5 E. (2) Then northerly along the Arroyo Seco to its intersection with the southern boundary of section 22, T. 19 S., R 5 E. * * * * * Signed: September 19, 2018. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. Approved: December 4, 2018. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy). [FR Doc. 2018-27014 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![64274 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Leah Wentz, who have established a that was used as a brand name on a § 9.48 Monticello.
vineyard in the proposed expansion label approved before July 7, 1986. See * * * * *
area, and who supported the proposed § 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 (c) * * *
expansion of the Monticello AVA. They CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details. (16) Then continuing southwest along
claim that they selected their vineyard The expansion of the Monticello AVA the county line to its intersection with
site in Fluvanna County based on the will not affect any other existing AVA, the Rivanna River;
various viticultural attributes of the and bottlers using ‘‘Monticello’’ as an (17) Then southeast along the Rivanna
area, especially including its climate appellation of origin or in a brand name River to its confluence with the James
and soils, which they said were for wines made from grapes within the River, near the Fluvanna-Goochland
accurately described in the initial ‘‘Monticello’’ AVA will not be affected County line;
petition. TTB did not receive any by this expansion of the Monticello (18) Then southwest, then northwest
comments objecting to the proposed AVA. The expansion of the Monticello along the James River to its intersection
AVA expansion. AVA will allow vintners to use with the Albemarle County line;
‘‘Monticello’’ as an appellation of origin * * * * *
TTB Determination
for wines made primarily from grapes
After careful review of the petition, Signed: September 5, 2018.
grown within the expansion area if the
TTB finds that the evidence provided by wines meet the eligibility requirements John J. Manfreda,
the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates for the appellation. Administrator.
that the proposed expansion area shares Approved: December 4, 2018.
the characteristics of the established Regulatory Flexibility Act
Timothy E. Skud,
Monticello AVA and should also be TTB certifies that this regulation will Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
recognized as part of that AVA. not have a significant economic impact Tariff Policy).
Accordingly, under the authority of the on a substantial number of small [FR Doc. 2018–27125 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the entities. The regulation imposes no new BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and reporting, recordkeeping, or other
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, administrative requirement. Any benefit
TTB expands the 1,320 square mile derived from the use of an AVA name DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
‘‘Monticello’’ AVA to include the would be the result of a proprietor’s
approximately 166 square mile efforts and consumer acceptance of Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
expansion area as described in Notice wines from that area. Therefore, no Bureau
No. 173, effective 30 days from the regulatory flexibility analysis is
publication date of this document. required. 27 CFR Part 9
Boundary Description Executive Order 12866 [Docket No. TTB–2018–0003; T.D. TTB–153;
See the narrative description of the It has been determined that this rule Ref: Notice No. 172]
boundary of the AVA expansion in the is not a significant regulatory action as
regulatory text published at the end of RIN 1513–AC36
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
this final rule. September 30, 1993. Therefore, no Expansion of the Arroyo Seco
Maps regulatory assessment is required. Viticultural Area
The petitioner provided the required Drafting Information AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
maps, and they are codified in the Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations Trade Bureau, Treasury.
regulatory text. and Rulings Division drafted this final ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
Impact on Current Wine Labels rule.
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
any label reference on a wine that the approximately 18,240-acre ‘‘Arroyo
Wine.
indicates or implies an origin other than Seco’’ viticultural area in Monterey
the wine’s true place of origin. For a The Regulatory Amendment County, California, by approximately 90
wine to be labeled with an AVA name acres. The established Arroyo Seco
For the reasons discussed in the
or with a brand name that includes an viticultural area and the expansion area
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the both lie within the established Monterey
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
wine must be derived from grapes viticultural area and the larger, multi-
follows:
grown within the area represented by county Central Coast viticultural area.
that name, and the wine must meet the PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL TTB designates viticultural areas to
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of AREAS allow vintners to better describe the
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). origin of their wines and to allow
If the wine is not eligible for labeling ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 consumers to better identify wines they
with an AVA name and that name continues to read as follows: may purchase.
appears in the brand name, then the Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. DATES: This final rule is effective
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and January 14, 2019.
Subpart C—Approved American
obtain approval of a new label. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Viticultural Areas
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and
another reference on the label in a ■ 2. Section 9.48 is amended by revising Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
misleading manner, the bottler would paragraph (c)(16), redesignating Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310
have to obtain approval of a new label. paragraph (c)(17) as (c)(19), and adding G Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC
Different rules apply if a wine has a new paragraph (c)(17) and paragraph 20005; phone 202–453–1039, ext. 150.
brand name containing an AVA name (c)(18) to read as follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:07 Dec 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM 14DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64514/page/1.svg)
![64276 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
boundary, and distinguishing features obtain approval of a new label. Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
for the proposed expansion area. For a Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
detailed description of the evidence another reference on the label in a Subpart C—Approved American
relating to the name, boundary, and misleading manner, the bottler would Viticultural Areas
distinguishing features of the proposed have to obtain approval of a new label.
■ 2. Section 9.59 is amended by revising
expansion area, and for a comparison of Different rules apply if a wine has a
paragraphs (c) introductory text and
the distinguishing features of the brand name containing an AVA name
(c)(1), redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)
proposed expansion area to the that was used as a brand name on a
through (c)(21) as paragraphs (c)(3)
surrounding areas and to the established label approved before July 7, 1986. See
through (c)(22), and adding new
Arroyo Seco AVA, see Notice No. 172. § 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
In Notice No. 172, TTB solicited paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
comments on the accuracy of the name, The expansion of the Arroyo Seco § 9.59 Arroyo Seco.
boundary, climatic, and other required AVA will not affect any other existing * * * * *
information submitted in support of the AVA, and bottlers using ‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’ (c) Boundaries. The Arroyo Seco
petition. The comment period closed on ‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central Coast’’ as an viticultural area is located in Monterey
June 5, 2018. appellation of origin or in a brand name County, California. The beginning point
TTB received no comments in for wines made from grapes within the is found on the ‘‘Sycamore Flat’’
response to Notice No. 172. ‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’ ‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central U.S.G.S. map at the intersection of
TTB Determination Coast’’ AVAs will not be affected by this Jamesburg Road (known locally as
expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA. The Carmel Valley Road) and Arroyo Seco
After careful review of the petition, expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will
TTB finds that the evidence provided by Road, near the intersection of sections
allow vintners to use ‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’ 21, 22, 28, and 27, T.19 S., R. 5 E. From
the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates ‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central Coast’’ as an
that although the proposed expansion the beginning point, proceed
appellation of origin for wines made southwesterly along Arroyo Seco Road
area shares some of the broader primarily from grapes grown within the
characteristics of the larger Monterey to its intersection with Piney Creek.
expansion area if the wines meet the (1) Then southeasterly along Piney
and Central Coast AVAs, it is also eligibility requirements for the
similar to the established Arroyo Seco Creek to its confluence with the Arroyo
appellation. Seco in section 27, T. 19 S., R. 5 E.
AVA and should also be recognized as
part of that AVA. Accordingly, under Regulatory Flexibility Act (2) Then northerly along the Arroyo
the authority of the FAA Act, section Seco to its intersection with the
TTB certifies that this regulation will southern boundary of section 22, T. 19
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of not have a significant economic impact
2002, and part 4 of the TTB regulations, S., R 5 E.
on a substantial number of small
TTB expands the 18,240 acre ‘‘Arroyo entities. The regulation imposes no new * * * * *
Seco’’ AVA to include the reporting, recordkeeping, or other Signed: September 19, 2018.
approximately 90-acre expansion area as administrative requirement. Any benefit John J. Manfreda,
described in Notice No. 172, effective 30 derived from the use of an AVA name Administrator.
days from the publication date of this would be the result of a proprietor’s Approved: December 4, 2018.
document. efforts and consumer acceptance of Timothy E. Skud,
Boundary Description wines from that area. Therefore, no Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
regulatory flexibility analysis is Tariff Policy).
See the narrative description of the required.
boundary of the AVA expansion in the [FR Doc. 2018–27014 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
regulatory text published at the end of Executive Order 12866 BILLING CODE P
this final rule. It has been determined that this rule
Maps is not a significant regulatory action as DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
The petitioner provided the required
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
maps, and they are listed in the
regulatory assessment is required. Bureau
regulatory text of 27 CFR 9.59.
Drafting Information
Impact on Current Wine Labels 27 CFR Part 9
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits Christopher Forster-Smith of the
Regulations and Rulings Division [Docket No. TTB–2018–0006; T.D. TTB–155;
any label reference on a wine that Ref: Notice No. 175]
indicates or implies an origin other than drafted this final rule.
the wine’s true place of origin. For a List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 RIN 1513–AC39
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
Wine. Establishment of the Van Duzer
or with a brand name that includes an
Corridor Viticultural Area and
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the The Regulatory Amendment
Clarification of the Eola-Amity Hills
wine must be derived from grapes For the reasons discussed in the Viticultural Area Boundary Description
grown within the area represented by preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
that name, and the wine must meet the I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of Trade Bureau, Treasury.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
follows:
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
If the wine is not eligible for labeling PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
with an AVA name and that name AREAS SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
appears in the brand name, then the and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
label is not in compliance, and the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 approximately 59,871-acre ‘‘Van Duzer
bottler must change the brand name and continues to read as follows: Corridor’’ viticultural area in Polk and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:07 Dec 13, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM 14DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64514/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-14 03:50:12
Document Modified: 2018-12-14 03:50:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; Treasury decision. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective January 14, 2019. | |
| Contact | Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310 G Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 150. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 64274 | |
| RIN Number | 1513-AC36 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR