83_FR_64534 83 FR 64294 - Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Change in Committee Structure for Processed Pears

83 FR 64294 - Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Change in Committee Structure for Processed Pears

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 240 (December 14, 2018)

Page Range64294-64296
FR Document2018-27140

This proposed rule invites comments on a recommendation from the Processed Pear Committee (Committee) to change the Committee's membership structure. This action would remove the second alternate member position from the Committee structure, leaving ten member positions and one alternate position for each respective member.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64294-64296]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27140]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 64294]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 927

[Doc. No. AMS-SC-18-0078; SC19-927-1 PR]


Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Change in Committee 
Structure for Processed Pears

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on a recommendation from 
the Processed Pear Committee (Committee) to change the Committee's 
membership structure. This action would remove the second alternate 
member position from the Committee structure, leaving ten member 
positions and one alternate position for each respective member.

DATES: Comments must be received by January 14, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket 
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, 
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number 
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and 
will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket 
Clerk during regular business hours or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this 
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available 
to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals 
or entities submitting comments will be made public on the internet at 
the address provided above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or 
Gary Olson, Regional Director, Northwest Marketing Field Office, 
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, 
USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: 
[email protected] or [email protected].
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement 
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue 
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, 
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing 
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under 
Marketing Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part 927), regulating the 
handling of pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Part 927, 
(hereinafter referred to as ``the Order'') is effective under the 
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally 
administers the Order and is comprised of growers, handlers and 
processors operating within the area of production, and a public 
member.
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule 
in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This proposed 
rule falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. 
Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition 
of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the 
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum 
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order 
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling 
Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive 
effect.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    Under the provisions of the Order, the Processed Pear Committee 
consists of ten members; three grower members, three handler members, 
three processor members, and one member representing the public. Under 
the current provisions, for each member there are two alternate members 
designated as the ``first alternate'' and the ``second alternate.'' 
This proposed rule would change the membership structure of the 
Processed Pear Committee by removing the second alternate position for 
all members. The Committee unanimously recommended this change at a 
meeting held on May 30, 2018.
    The membership structure of the Processed Pear Committee is 
established in Sec.  927.20(b) of the Order. In addition, Sec.  
927.20(c) provides that the Secretary, upon recommendation of the 
Committee, may reapportion members among districts, may change the 
number of members and alternate members, and may change the composition 
of the Committee by changing the ratio of members, including their 
alternates. The Committee structure was reapportioned in 2013; section 
927.150 specifies the current reapportioned Committee membership 
structure.
    At its May 30, 2018, meeting, the Committee unanimously recommended 
changing the Committee structure by removing the second alternate 
position. In recent years, the Committee has experienced difficulties 
in finding enough eligible nominees to fill the second alternate 
positions. It is the Committee's belief that continuing to fill the 
second alternate positions carries limited benefit to their operation 
and

[[Page 64295]]

has become a burdensome task. Further, the second alternate position 
has rarely been called upon to serve on the Committee to conduct 
business. As such, this rule would amend Sec.  927.150 of the Order's 
administrative rules and regulations by removing the second alternate 
position. The ten member positions would remain with one alternate 
member position assigned to each. This change should result in more 
efficiency in filling the Committee's membership positions, while still 
maintaining adequate representation of the processed pear industry.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) 
has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small 
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act are unique in that they are brought about through 
group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 1,500 growers of processed pears in the 
regulated production area and approximately 43 handlers of processed 
pears subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural 
producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 
CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000, and 
small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual 
receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
    According to data compiled by the National Agricultural Statistics 
Service (NASS) for 2017, the state of Oregon produced 32,300 tons of 
pears for processing at a market year average price of $388 per ton for 
an estimated total value of $12,532,400. The state of Washington 
produced 85,900 tons at a market year average price of $344 per ton for 
an estimated total value of $29,549,600. Therefore, the total value of 
production of processed pears assessed under the Order for the last 
year was $42,082,000 ($12,532,400 plus $29,549,600). Based on the 
number of processed pear growers in Oregon and Washington (1,500), and 
assuming a normal distribution, the average gross revenue for each 
producer can be estimated at approximately $28,055 ($42,082,000 divided 
by 1,500 growers). Furthermore, based on Committee records, it is 
reported that all Oregon and Washington processed pear handlers 
currently ship less than $7,500,000 worth of processed pears annually. 
From this information, USDA concludes that the majority of growers and 
handlers of Oregon and Washington processed pears may be classified as 
small entities.
    There are three pear processing plants in the production area, all 
currently located in Washington. According to Committee records, all 
three pear processors would be considered large entities under the 
SBA's definition of a small business.
    This rule would amend Sec.  927.150 of the Order's administrative 
rules and regulations to change the Committee's membership structure by 
removing the second alternate position. Authority for the modification 
of the Committee structure is provided in Sec.  927.20(c) of the Order.
    The Committee believes that the proposed change would not 
negatively impact growers, handlers, or processors. The benefits for 
this rule are not expected to be disproportionately greater or lesser 
for small growers, handlers, or processors than for larger entities. 
The proposed change is expected to benefit the industry as a whole 
through more efficient selection of Committee members and alternates.
    The Committee did not discuss other alternatives to this proposed 
change at its May 30, 2018, meeting. The only other option was to leave 
the Order unchanged and maintain the status quo, which would have 
required the Committee to continue to fill the second alternate 
positions moving forward. By eliminating the second alternate position 
from the Committee structure, the industry would only have to nominate 
and put forward for selection two-thirds of the qualified candidates 
that are currently required.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Fruit, 
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements would 
be necessary as a result of this action. Should any changes become 
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
    This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Oregon and 
Washington processed pear handlers. As with all Federal marketing order 
programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce 
information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector 
agencies.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions 
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the 
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be 
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927

    Marketing agreements, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

0
2. Revise Sec.  927.150 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.150   Reapportionment of the Processed Pear Committee.

    Pursuant to Sec.  927.20(c), on or after July 1, 2019, the 10-
member Processed Pear Committee is reapportioned and shall consist of 
three grower members, three handler members, three processor members, 
and one member representing the public. For each member there shall be 
an alternate. District 1, the State of Washington, shall be represented 
by two grower members and two handler members. District 2, the State of 
Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member and one handler 
member. Processor members may be from District 1, District 2, or from 
both districts.


[[Page 64296]]


    Dated: December 11, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-27140 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-02-P



                                                64294

                                                Proposed Rules                                                                                                Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                              Vol. 83, No. 240

                                                                                                                                                              Friday, December 14, 2018



                                                This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:      Dale            section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
                                                contains notices to the public of the proposed          Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or Gary                handler subject to an order may file
                                                issuance of rules and regulations. The                  Olson, Regional Director, Northwest                   with USDA a petition stating that the
                                                purpose of these notices is to give interested          Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order               order, any provision of the order, or any
                                                persons an opportunity to participate in the            and Agreement Division, Specialty                     obligation imposed in connection with
                                                rule making prior to the adoption of the final
                                                rules.
                                                                                                        Crops Program, AMS, USDA;                             the order is not in accordance with law
                                                                                                        Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)                 and request a modification of the order
                                                                                                        326–7440, or Email: DaleJ.Novotny@                    or to be exempted therefrom. Such
                                                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.                     handler is afforded the opportunity for
                                                                                                           Small businesses may request                       a hearing on the petition. After the
                                                Agricultural Marketing Service                          information on complying with this                    hearing, USDA would rule on the
                                                                                                        regulation by contacting Richard Lower,               petition. The Act provides that the
                                                7 CFR Part 927                                          Marketing Order and Agreement                         district court of the United States in any
                                                                                                        Division, Specialty Crops Program,                    district in which the handler is an
                                                [Doc. No. AMS–SC–18–0078; SC19–927–1                    AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence                          inhabitant, or has his or her principal
                                                PR]                                                     Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,                     place of business, has jurisdiction to
                                                                                                        DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–                  review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
                                                Pears Grown in Oregon and                               2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:                  provided an action is filed not later than
                                                Washington; Change in Committee                         Richard.Lower@usda.gov.                               20 days after the date of the entry of the
                                                Structure for Processed Pears                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This                       ruling.
                                                                                                        action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,                        Under the provisions of the Order, the
                                                AGENCY:  Agricultural Marketing Service,                                                                      Processed Pear Committee consists of
                                                                                                        proposes an amendment to regulations
                                                USDA.                                                                                                         ten members; three grower members,
                                                                                                        issued to carry out a marketing order as
                                                ACTION: Proposed rule.                                  defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed              three handler members, three processor
                                                                                                        rule is issued under Marketing Order                  members, and one member representing
                                                SUMMARY:   This proposed rule invites                                                                         the public. Under the current
                                                comments on a recommendation from                       No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part 927),
                                                                                                        regulating the handling of pears grown                provisions, for each member there are
                                                the Processed Pear Committee                                                                                  two alternate members designated as the
                                                (Committee) to change the Committee’s                   in Oregon and Washington. Part 927,
                                                                                                        (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Order’’)            ‘‘first alternate’’ and the ‘‘second
                                                membership structure. This action                                                                             alternate.’’ This proposed rule would
                                                would remove the second alternate                       is effective under the Agricultural
                                                                                                        Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as                   change the membership structure of the
                                                member position from the Committee                                                                            Processed Pear Committee by removing
                                                structure, leaving ten member positions                 amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
                                                                                                        referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee             the second alternate position for all
                                                and one alternate position for each                                                                           members. The Committee unanimously
                                                respective member.                                      locally administers the Order and is
                                                                                                        comprised of growers, handlers and                    recommended this change at a meeting
                                                DATES: Comments must be received by                     processors operating within the area of               held on May 30, 2018.
                                                January 14, 2019.                                       production, and a public member.                         The membership structure of the
                                                ADDRESSES: Interested persons are                          The Department of Agriculture                      Processed Pear Committee is established
                                                invited to submit written comments                      (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in               in § 927.20(b) of the Order. In addition,
                                                concerning this proposed rule.                          conformance with Executive Orders                     § 927.20(c) provides that the Secretary,
                                                Comments must be sent to the Docket                     13563 and 13175. This proposed rule                   upon recommendation of the
                                                Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement                    falls within a category of regulatory                 Committee, may reapportion members
                                                Division, Specialty Crops Program,                      actions that the Office of Management                 among districts, may change the number
                                                AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence                            and Budget (OMB) exempted from                        of members and alternate members, and
                                                Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,                       Executive Order 12866 review.                         may change the composition of the
                                                DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or                  Additionally, because this proposed                   Committee by changing the ratio of
                                                internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All               rule does not meet the definition of a                members, including their alternates. The
                                                comments should reference the                           significant regulatory action, it does not            Committee structure was reapportioned
                                                document number and the date and                        trigger the requirements contained in                 in 2013; section 927.150 specifies the
                                                page number of this issue of the Federal                Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s                      current reapportioned Committee
                                                Register and will be available for public               Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance                  membership structure.
                                                inspection in the Office of the Docket                  Implementing Section 2 of the Executive                  At its May 30, 2018, meeting, the
                                                Clerk during regular business hours or                  Order of January 30, 2017, titled                     Committee unanimously recommended
                                                can be viewed at: http://                               ‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling                  changing the Committee structure by
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1




                                                www.regulations.gov. All comments                       Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).              removing the second alternate position.
                                                submitted in response to this proposed                     This proposed rule has been reviewed               In recent years, the Committee has
                                                rule will be included in the record and                 under Executive Order 12988, Civil                    experienced difficulties in finding
                                                will be made available to the public.                   Justice Reform. This rule is not intended             enough eligible nominees to fill the
                                                Please be advised that the identity of the              to have retroactive effect.                           second alternate positions. It is the
                                                individuals or entities submitting                         The Act provides that administrative               Committee’s belief that continuing to fill
                                                comments will be made public on the                     proceedings must be exhausted before                  the second alternate positions carries
                                                internet at the address provided above.                 parties may file suit in court. Under                 limited benefit to their operation and


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:34 Dec 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1


                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                            64295

                                                has become a burdensome task. Further,                  Furthermore, based on Committee                       reviewed to reduce information
                                                the second alternate position has rarely                records, it is reported that all Oregon               requirements and duplication by
                                                been called upon to serve on the                        and Washington processed pear                         industry and public sector agencies.
                                                Committee to conduct business. As                       handlers currently ship less than                        AMS is committed to complying with
                                                such, this rule would amend § 927.150                   $7,500,000 worth of processed pears
                                                                                                                                                              the E-Government Act, to promote the
                                                of the Order’s administrative rules and                 annually. From this information, USDA
                                                                                                                                                              use of the internet and other
                                                regulations by removing the second                      concludes that the majority of growers
                                                alternate position. The ten member                      and handlers of Oregon and Washington                 information technologies to provide
                                                positions would remain with one                         processed pears may be classified as                  increased opportunities for citizen
                                                alternate member position assigned to                   small entities.                                       access to Government information and
                                                each. This change should result in more                    There are three pear processing plants             services, and for other purposes.
                                                efficiency in filling the Committee’s                   in the production area, all currently                    USDA has not identified any relevant
                                                membership positions, while still                       located in Washington. According to                   Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
                                                maintaining adequate representation of                  Committee records, all three pear                     conflict with this proposed rule.
                                                the processed pear industry.                            processors would be considered large
                                                                                                        entities under the SBA’s definition of a                 A small business guide on complying
                                                Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis                 small business.                                       with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
                                                  Pursuant to requirements set forth in                    This rule would amend § 927.150 of                 marketing agreements and orders may
                                                the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5                 the Order’s administrative rules and                  be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/
                                                U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural                       regulations to change the Committee’s                 rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
                                                Marketing Service (AMS) has                             membership structure by removing the                  Any questions about the compliance
                                                considered the economic impact of this                  second alternate position. Authority for              guide should be sent to Richard Lower
                                                proposed rule on small entities.                        the modification of the Committee                     at the previously mentioned address in
                                                Accordingly, AMS has prepared this                      structure is provided in § 927.20(c) of               the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                                                initial regulatory flexibility analysis.                the Order.                                            section.
                                                  The purpose of the RFA is to fit                         The Committee believes that the
                                                                                                                                                                 A 30-day comment period is provided
                                                regulatory actions to the scale of                      proposed change would not negatively
                                                business subject to such actions in order               impact growers, handlers, or processors.              to allow interested persons to respond
                                                that small businesses will not be unduly                The benefits for this rule are not                    to this proposal. All written comments
                                                or disproportionately burdened.                         expected to be disproportionately                     timely received will be considered
                                                Marketing orders issued pursuant to the                 greater or lesser for small growers,                  before a final determination is made on
                                                Act are unique in that they are brought                 handlers, or processors than for larger               this matter.
                                                about through group action of                           entities. The proposed change is                      List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
                                                essentially small entities acting on their              expected to benefit the industry as a
                                                own behalf.                                             whole through more efficient selection                  Marketing agreements, Pears,
                                                  There are approximately 1,500                         of Committee members and alternates.                  Reporting and recordkeeping
                                                growers of processed pears in the                          The Committee did not discuss other                requirements.
                                                regulated production area and                           alternatives to this proposed change at
                                                approximately 43 handlers of processed                  its May 30, 2018, meeting. The only                     For the reasons set forth in the
                                                pears subject to regulation under the                   other option was to leave the Order                   preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is proposed to
                                                Order. Small agricultural producers are                 unchanged and maintain the status quo,                be amended as follows:
                                                defined by the Small Business                           which would have required the
                                                Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)                   Committee to continue to fill the second              PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN
                                                as those having annual receipts of less                 alternate positions moving forward. By                OREGON AND WASHINGTON
                                                than $750,000, and small agricultural                   eliminating the second alternate
                                                service firms are defined as those whose                position from the Committee structure,                ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
                                                annual receipts are less than $7,500,000                the industry would only have to                       part 927 continues to read as follows:
                                                (13 CFR 121.201).                                       nominate and put forward for selection                    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
                                                  According to data compiled by the                     two-thirds of the qualified candidates
                                                National Agricultural Statistics Service                that are currently required.                          ■   2. Revise § 927.150 to read as follows:
                                                (NASS) for 2017, the state of Oregon                       In accordance with the Paperwork
                                                produced 32,300 tons of pears for                       Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.                     § 927.150 Reapportionment of the
                                                processing at a market year average                     Chapter 35), the Order’s information                  Processed Pear Committee.
                                                price of $388 per ton for an estimated                  collection requirements have been                        Pursuant to § 927.20(c), on or after
                                                total value of $12,532,400. The state of                previously approved by OMB and                        July 1, 2019, the 10-member Processed
                                                Washington produced 85,900 tons at a                    assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Fruit,                    Pear Committee is reapportioned and
                                                market year average price of $344 per                   Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
                                                ton for an estimated total value of                                                                           shall consist of three grower members,
                                                                                                        changes in those requirements would be
                                                $29,549,600. Therefore, the total value                                                                       three handler members, three processor
                                                                                                        necessary as a result of this action.
                                                of production of processed pears                        Should any changes become necessary,                  members, and one member representing
                                                assessed under the Order for the last                   they would be submitted to OMB for                    the public. For each member there shall
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1




                                                year was $42,082,000 ($12,532,400 plus                  approval.                                             be an alternate. District 1, the State of
                                                $29,549,600). Based on the number of                       This proposed rule would not impose                Washington, shall be represented by two
                                                processed pear growers in Oregon and                    any additional reporting or                           grower members and two handler
                                                Washington (1,500), and assuming a                      recordkeeping requirements on either                  members. District 2, the State of Oregon,
                                                normal distribution, the average gross                  small or large Oregon and Washington                  shall be represented by one grower
                                                revenue for each producer can be                        processed pear handlers. As with all                  member and one handler member.
                                                estimated at approximately $28,055                      Federal marketing order programs,                     Processor members may be from District
                                                ($42,082,000 divided by 1,500 growers).                 reports and forms are periodically                    1, District 2, or from both districts.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:34 Dec 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1


                                                64296                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules

                                                  Dated: December 11, 2018.                             2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:                  on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
                                                Bruce Summers,                                          Richard.Lower@usda.gov.                               would rule on the petition. The Act
                                                Administrator, Agricultural Marketing                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This                       provides that the district court of the
                                                Service.                                                proposal, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,                   United States in any district in which
                                                [FR Doc. 2018–27140 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]            proposes amendments to regulations                    the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
                                                BILLING CODE 3410–02–P                                  issued to carry out a marketing order as              or her principal place of business, has
                                                                                                        defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal              jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
                                                                                                        is issued under Marketing Order No.                   the petition, provided an action is filed
                                                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               956, as amended (7 CFR part 956),                     no later than 20 days after the date of
                                                                                                        regulating the handling of sweet onions               entry of the ruling.
                                                Agricultural Marketing Service                          grown in the Walla Walla Valley of                       Section 1504 of the Food,
                                                                                                        Southeast Washington and Northeast                    Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
                                                7 CFR Part 956                                          Oregon. Part 956 (referred to as the                  (2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246)
                                                                                                        ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the                     amended section 608c(17) of the Act,
                                                [Doc. No. AMS–SC–18–0028; SC–18–956–1]                                                                        which in turn required the addition of
                                                                                                        Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
                                                                                                        of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),               supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR
                                                Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla
                                                                                                        hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The           part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21,
                                                Walla Valley of Southeast Washington
                                                                                                        Committee locally administers the                     2008). The amendment of section
                                                and Northeast Oregon; Proposed
                                                                                                                                                              608c(17) of the Act and the
                                                Amendments to Marketing Order 956                       Order and is comprised of sweet onion
                                                                                                                                                              supplemental rules of practice authorize
                                                and Referendum Order                                    producers and handlers operating
                                                                                                                                                              the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C.
                                                                                                        within the area of production and a
                                                AGENCY:  Agricultural Marketing Service,                                                                      553) to amend Federal fruit, vegetable,
                                                                                                        public member.
                                                USDA.                                                                                                         and nut marketing agreements and
                                                                                                           Section 608c(17) of the Act and the
                                                ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum
                                                                                                                                                              orders. USDA may use informal
                                                                                                        applicable rules of practice and
                                                order.                                                                                                        rulemaking to amend marketing orders
                                                                                                        procedure governing the formulation of
                                                                                                                                                              based on the nature and complexity of
                                                                                                        marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR
                                                SUMMARY:   This document proposes                                                                             the proposed amendments, the potential
                                                                                                        part 900) authorizes amendment of the
                                                amendments to Marketing Order No.                                                                             regulatory and economic impacts on
                                                                                                        Order through this informal rulemaking                affected entities, and any other relevant
                                                956, which regulates the handling of                    action.
                                                sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla                                                                         matters.
                                                                                                           The Department of Agriculture                         AMS has considered these factors and
                                                Valley of Southeast Washington and                      (USDA) is issuing this rule in
                                                Northeast Oregon. The Walla Walla                                                                             has determined that the amendments
                                                                                                        conformance with Executive Orders                     proposed are not unduly complex and
                                                Sweet Onion Marketing Committee                         13563 and 13175. This action falls
                                                (Committee) recommended changing the                                                                          the nature of the proposed amendments
                                                                                                        within a category of regulatory actions               is appropriate for utilizing the informal
                                                Committee’s size, quorum, and voting                    that the Office of Management and
                                                requirements. The Committee also                                                                              rulemaking process to amend the Order.
                                                                                                        Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive                     The proposed amendments were
                                                recommended changing the term of                        Order 12866 review. Additionally,
                                                office and staggered term limits so that                                                                      unanimously recommended by the
                                                                                                        because this proposed rule does not                   Committee following deliberations at
                                                the term of office for producers and                    meet the definition of a significant
                                                handlers would be two fiscal periods                                                                          two public meetings held on November
                                                                                                        regulatory action, it does not trigger the            14, 2017, and March 3, 2018. The
                                                instead of three fiscal periods, and one-               requirements contained in Executive
                                                half instead of one-third of the producer                                                                     proposals would amend the Order by
                                                                                                        Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum                     changing the Committee’s size, quorum,
                                                and handler member terms would                          titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
                                                expire every year.                                                                                            and voting requirements. This action
                                                                                                        Section 2 of the Executive Order of                   would also change the term of office and
                                                DATES: The referendum will be                           January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing                    staggered term limits so that the term of
                                                conducted from December 17, 2018,                       Regulation and Controlling Regulatory                 office for producers and handlers would
                                                through December 31, 2018. The                          Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).                         be two fiscal periods instead of three
                                                representative period for the referendum                   This proposal has been reviewed                    fiscal periods, and one-half instead of
                                                is June 1, 2017, through May 31, 2018.                  under Executive Order 12988, Civil                    one-third of the producer and handler
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Justice Reform. This rule is not intended             member terms would expire every year.
                                                Geronimo Quinones, Marketing                            to have retroactive effect. This rule shall           If the proposed amendments are
                                                Specialist, or Patty Bennett, Director,                 not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or                finalized, the Committee would hold
                                                Marketing Order and Agreement                           supersede any State program covering                  nominations for producer and handler
                                                Division, Specialty Crops Program,                      sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla                 member and alternate positions. All the
                                                AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence                            Valley of Southeast Washington and                    Committee’s producer and handler
                                                Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC                    Northeast Oregon.                                     positions would be filled by new
                                                20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–                          The Act provides that administrative               nominations. Members and alternates
                                                2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:                    proceedings must be exhausted before                  who are currently serving could be
                                                Geronimo.Quinones@usda.gov or                           parties may file suit in court. Under                 nominated to serve on the new
                                                Patty.Bennett@usda.gov.                                 section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any                   Committee.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1




                                                   Small businesses may request                         handler subject to an order may file                     A proposed rule soliciting comments
                                                information on complying with this                      with USDA a petition stating that the                 on the proposed amendments was
                                                regulation by contacting Richard Lower,                 order, any provision of the order, or any             issued on July 19, 2018, and published
                                                Marketing Order and Agreement                           obligation imposed in connection with                 in the Federal Register on July 24, 2018
                                                Division, Specialty Crops Program,                      the order is not in accordance with law               (83 FR 34953). One comment in support
                                                AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence                            and request a modification of the order               of the amendments was received. AMS
                                                Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,                       or to be exempted therefrom. A handler                will conduct a producer referendum to
                                                DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–                    is afforded the opportunity for a hearing             determine support for the proposed


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:34 Dec 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM   14DEP1



Document Created: 2018-12-14 03:50:35
Document Modified: 2018-12-14 03:50:35
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesComments must be received by January 14, 2019.
ContactDale Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or Gary Olson, Regional Director, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 64294 
CFR AssociatedMarketing Agreements; Pears and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR