83_FR_64569 83 FR 64329 - Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016

83 FR 64329 - Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 240 (December 14, 2018)

Page Range64329-64330
FR Document2018-27119

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on pasta from Italy. We have determined that GR.A.M.M. S.r.l. (GR.A.M.M.), the only mandatory respondent, received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64329-64330]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-475-819]


Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its 
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on pasta 
from Italy. We have determined that GR.A.M.M. S.r.l. (GR.A.M.M.), the 
only mandatory respondent, received countervailable subsidies during 
the period of review (POR) January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016.

DATES: Applicable December 14, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 24, 1996, Commerce published in the Federal Register a CVD 
Order on pasta from Italy.\1\ On August 9, 2018, Commerce published the 
Preliminary Results of this CVD administrative review in the Federal 
Register.\2\ Commerce gave interested parties an opportunity to comment 
on the Preliminary Results. On September 11, 2018, we received a case 
brief from GR.A.M.M. No rebuttal comments were received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final 
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta 
(``Pasta'') from Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996) (Order).
    \2\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission; 
2016, 83 FR 39418 (August 9, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is certain non-egg dry pasta 
from Italy. The merchandise subject to this order is currently 
classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise subject to the order is 
dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted in this 
notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain 
Pasta from Italy; 2016,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the respondent's case brief are listed in the 
Appendix to this notice and are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum accompanying this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of 
the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    For the final results, we changed the calculation of the 
countervailable subsidy rate for Action 6.1.4, Aid on Investment 
Program Promoted by Micro and Small Businesses, based on additional 
information provided regarding the specificity of the program and no 
longer find the portion of the program funded by the Regional 
Government of Puglia to be countervailable.

Methodology

    We conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy 
programs found to be countervailable during the POR, we find that there 
is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that 
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 
specific.\4\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regrading 
benefit; and, section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rate for 
GR.A.M.M., for the period, January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Net
                                                                subsidy
                      Producer/exporter                          rate
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GR.A.M.M. S.r.l.............................................        1.18
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose to the parties in this proceeding the 
calculations performed for these final results within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 
days after the date of publication of these final results to liquidate 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption, on or after January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, 
at the ad valorem rate listed above.

Cash Deposit Instructions

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend to 
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties in the amount shown above for shipments of subject merchandise 
by GR.A.M.M.. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 
continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at 
the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the 
company. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections

[[Page 64330]]

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: December 7, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. List of Interested Party Comments
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Subsidy Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Commerce Should Not Make Any Changes to the Results 
Other Than Those Raised in Parties' Briefs
    Comment 2: Commerce Should Exclude the Action 6.1.4. Program 
from the Final Results
    Commerce 3: Commerce Should Recalculate the Benefit for the ERDF 
Action 4.1 Program
IX. Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2018-27119 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices                                                       64329

                                                Comment 5: Use of Revised Data in the                 items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of                  conclusions, see the Issues and Decision
                                                   Final Results of Review                            the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                  Memorandum.
                                                Comment 6: Failure to Report End-User                 United States (HTSUS). Although the
                                                   Customer Codes                                                                                            Final Results of Review
                                                                                                      HTSUS subheadings are provided for
                                              VII. Recommendation                                                                                              We determine the following net
                                                                                                      convenience and customs purposes, the
                                              [FR Doc. 2018–27120 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]            written description of the merchandise                 countervailable subsidy rate for
                                              BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  subject to the order is dispositive. A full            GR.A.M.M., for the period, January 1,
                                                                                                      description of the scope of the order is               2016, through December 31, 2016:
                                                                                                      contained in the Issues and Decision
                                              DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Memorandum, which is hereby adopted                                                                    Net
                                                                                                                                                                                                           subsidy
                                                                                                      in this notice.3                                                 Producer/exporter                     rate
                                              International Trade Administration
                                                                                                      Analysis of Comments Received                                                                       (percent)
                                              [C–475–819]
                                                                                                         All issues raised in the respondent’s               GR.A.M.M. S.r.l ..........................        1.18
                                              Pasta From Italy: Final Results of                      case brief are listed in the Appendix to
                                              Countervailing Duty Administrative                      this notice and are addressed in the                   Disclosure
                                              Review; 2016                                            Issues and Decision Memorandum                            We intend to disclose to the parties in
                                                                                                      accompanying this notice. The Issues                   this proceeding the calculations
                                              AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                   and Decision Memorandum is a public
                                              International Trade Administration,                                                                            performed for these final results within
                                                                                                      document and is on file electronically                 five days of the date of publication of
                                              Department of Commerce.                                 via Enforcement and Compliance’s
                                              SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                                                                            this notice in the Federal Register.5
                                                                                                      Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
                                              (Commerce) has completed its                            Centralized Electronic Service System                  Assessment Rates
                                              administrative review of the                            (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to                          In accordance with 19 CFR
                                              countervailing duty (CVD) order on                      registered users at http://                            351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to
                                              pasta from Italy. We have determined                    access.trade.gov and in the Central                    issue assessment instructions to U.S.
                                              that GR.A.M.M. S.r.l. (GR.A.M.M.), the                  Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main                   Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15
                                              only mandatory respondent, received                     Commerce building. In addition, a                      days after the date of publication of
                                              countervailable subsidies during the                    complete version of the Issues and                     these final results to liquidate
                                              period of review (POR) January 1, 2016,                 Decision Memorandum can be accessed                    shipments of subject merchandise
                                              through December 31, 2016.                              directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/              entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
                                              DATES: Applicable December 14, 2018.                    frn. The signed and electronic versions                for consumption, on or after January 1,
                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        of the Issues and Decision                             2016 through December 31, 2016, at the
                                              Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations,                        Memorandum are identical in content.                   ad valorem rate listed above.
                                              Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,                   Changes Since the Preliminary Results                  Cash Deposit Instructions
                                              International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                        For the final results, we changed the                   In accordance with section
                                              U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                                                                      calculation of the countervailable                     751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend to
                                              Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
                                                                                                      subsidy rate for Action 6.1.4, Aid on                  instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
                                              DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785.
                                                                                                      Investment Program Promoted by Micro                   estimated countervailing duties in the
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              and Small Businesses, based on                         amount shown above for shipments of
                                              Background                                              additional information provided                        subject merchandise by GR.A.M.M.. For
                                                                                                      regarding the specificity of the program               all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct
                                                 On July 24, 1996, Commerce                           and no longer find the portion of the
                                              published in the Federal Register a CVD                                                                        CBP to continue to collect cash deposits
                                                                                                      program funded by the Regional                         of estimated countervailing duties at the
                                              Order on pasta from Italy.1 On August                   Government of Puglia to be
                                              9, 2018, Commerce published the                                                                                most recent company-specific or all-
                                                                                                      countervailable.                                       others rate applicable to the company.
                                              Preliminary Results of this CVD
                                              administrative review in the Federal                    Methodology                                            These cash deposit requirements, when
                                              Register.2 Commerce gave interested                                                                            imposed, shall remain in effect until
                                                                                                        We conducted this review in
                                              parties an opportunity to comment on                                                                           further notice.
                                                                                                      accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of
                                              the Preliminary Results. On September                   the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the                Administrative Protective Orders
                                              11, 2018, we received a case brief from                 Act). For each of the subsidy programs                   This notice also serves as a reminder
                                              GR.A.M.M. No rebuttal comments were                     found to be countervailable during the                 to parties subject to administrative
                                              received.                                               POR, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e.,            protective order (APO) of their
                                              Scope of the Order                                      a government-provided financial                        responsibility concerning the
                                                                                                      contribution that gives rise to a benefit              destruction of proprietary information
                                                 The merchandise covered by this                      to the recipient, and that the subsidy is              disclosed under APO in accordance
                                              order is certain non-egg dry pasta from                 specific.4 For a full description of the               with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
                                              Italy. The merchandise subject to this                  methodology underlying our                             written notification of the return or
                                              order is currently classifiable under
                                                                                                        3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                                                                                                                             destruction of APO materials or
                                                                                                                                                             conversion to judicial protective order is
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                1 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and         Memorandum for the Final Results of
                                              Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty           Countervailing Duty Administrative Review:             hereby requested. Failure to comply
                                              Determination: Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) from Italy,    Certain Pasta from Italy; 2016,’’ dated concurrently   with the regulations and terms of an
                                              61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996) (Order).                    with this notice (Issues and Decision                  APO is a sanctionable violation.
                                                2 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results   Memorandum).                                             We are issuing and publishing these
                                              of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and          4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act

                                              Partial Rescission; 2016, 83 FR 39418 (August 9,        regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
                                                                                                                                                             results in accordance with sections
                                              2018) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying           of the Act regrading benefit; and, section 771(5A)
                                              Preliminary Decision Memorandum.                        of the Act regarding specificity.                        5 See   19 CFR 351.224(b).



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:57 Dec 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM     14DEN1


                                              64330                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices

                                              751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19               Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd                       production from the dumping margin
                                              CFR 351.221(b)(5).                                      (Zhaoqing Tifo).                                       calculation to address the Court’s
                                                Dated: December 7, 2018.                              DATES: Applicable December 10, 2018.                   concern over potential double counting
                                              Gary Taverman,                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry                 of energy inputs.8 On November 30,
                                                                                                      Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,                    2018, the CIT sustained Commerce’s
                                              Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                              and Countervailing Duty Operations,                     Enforcement and Compliance,                            Second Remand Redetermination.9
                                              performing the non-exclusive functions and              International Trade Administration,                    Timken Notice
                                              duties of the Assistant Secretary for                   U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
                                              Enforcement and Compliance.                             Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,                       In its decision in Timken,10 as
                                                                                                      DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4047.                    clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the
                                              Appendix                                                                                                       Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
                                                                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                              List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and                                                                     (CAFC) held that, pursuant to section
                                              Decision Memorandum                                     Background                                             516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                              I. Summary                                                 On January 11, 2013, Commerce                       amended (the Act), Commerce must
                                              II. Background                                          published its Final Results of the 2010–               publish a notice of a court decision that
                                              III. List of Interested Party Comments                  2011 AD administrative review of PSF                   is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce
                                              IV. Scope of the Order                                  from China.1 On April 7, 2015, the CIT                 determination and must suspend
                                              V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results                remanded the Final Results to                          liquidation of entries pending a
                                              VI. Subsidy Valuation Information                                                                              ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.12 The
                                                                                                      Commerce to reconsider the dumping
                                              VII. Analysis of Programs                                                                                      CIT’s November 30, 2018, final
                                              VIII. Discussion of the Issues                          margin calculation for Zhaoqing Tifo
                                                 Comment 1: Commerce Should Not Make                  and to consider any potential for double               judgment affirming the Second Remand
                                                    Any Changes to the Results Other Than             counting of energy inputs by the                       Redetermination constitutes a final
                                                    Those Raised in Parties’ Briefs                   inclusion of coal as a factor of                       decision of the Court that is not in
                                                 Comment 2: Commerce Should Exclude                   production (FOP), as alleged by                        harmony with Commerce’s Final
                                                    the Action 6.1.4. Program from the Final          Zhaoqing Tifo.2 In its First Remand                    Results. This notice is published in
                                                    Results                                           Redetermination, Commerce relied                       fulfillment of the publication
                                                 Commerce 3: Commerce Should                          upon a different set of financial                      requirements of Timken and section
                                                    Recalculate the Benefit for the ERDF              statements that allowed Commerce to                    516A of the Act.
                                                    Action 4.1 Program
                                              IX. Conclusion
                                                                                                      more accurately calculate Zhaoqing                     Amended Final Results
                                                                                                      Tifo’s dumping margin while also
                                              [FR Doc. 2018–27119 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]            addressing any concerns of double                        Because there is now a final court
                                              BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  counting of energy inputs.3 On August                  decision, Commerce is amending its
                                                                                                      30, 2017, the Court remanded this issue                Final Results. Commerce finds that the
                                                                                                      to Commerce a second time, finding that                revised AD dumping margin for
                                              DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Commerce’s selection of financial                      Zhaoqing Tifo is as follows:
                                              International Trade Administration                      statements was not timely challenged by
                                                                                                      any party and was, thus, beyond the                                                               Weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                         average
                                              [A–570–905]                                             scope of the remand in Zhaoqing Tifo I.4                       Producer/exporter                  dumping
                                                                                                      Therefore, the Court instructed                                                                    margin
                                              Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From                     Commerce to reconsider how the                                                                    (percent)
                                              the People’s Republic of China: Notice                  surrogate financial ratios originally used
                                              of Court Decision Not in Harmony With                   in Final Results account for energy                    Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber
                                              Final Results of Antidumping Duty                       sources and whether the inclusion of                     Co., Ltd .............................     0.00
                                              Administrative Review and Notice of                     coal in the FOP database results in
                                              Amended Final Results of                                double-counting.5 In its Second Remand                   Accordingly, Commerce will continue
                                              Antidumping Duty Administrative                         Redetermination, under respectful                      the suspension of liquidation of the
                                              Review                                                  protest,6 Commerce relied on the                       subject merchandise pending the
                                                                                                      financial statements used in the Final                 expiration of the period of appeal or, if
                                              AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                          appealed, pending a final and
                                              International Trade Administration,                     Results,7 and removed coal as a factor of
                                                                                                                                                             conclusive court decision. In the event
                                              Department of Commerce.                                                                                        the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if
                                                                                                         1 See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the
                                              SUMMARY: On November 30, 2018, the                                                                             appealed, upheld by the CAFC,
                                                                                                      People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
                                              United States Court of International                    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–          Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
                                              Trade (CIT or the Court) sustained the                  2011, 78 FR 2366 (January 11, 2013) (Final Results)    and Border Protection to assess
                                              final results of redetermination                        and accompanying Issues and Decision
                                                                                                      Memorandum (IDM).
                                                                                                                                                             antidumping duties on unliquidated
                                              pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD)                    2 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United   entries of subject merchandise exported
                                              administrative review of certain                        States, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (CIT 2015) (Zhaoqing
                                              polyester staple fiber (PSF) from the                   Tifo I).                                                  8 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant

                                              People’s Republic of China (China) for                     3 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant     to Court Remand Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd.
                                              the period of review (POR) June 1, 2010,                to Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United         v. United States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 17–
                                                                                                      States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 15–31 (April      118 (CIT August 30, 2017), dated November 6, 2017
                                              through May 31, 2011. The Department                    9, 2015), dated July 9, 2015 (First Remand             (Second Remand Redetermination).
                                              of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying                     Redetermination).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1




                                                                                                                                                                9 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United
                                              the public that the final judgment in this                 4 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United   States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 18–168 (CIT
                                              case is not in harmony with the final                   States, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1314, 1334 (CIT 2017)          November 30, 2018).
                                              results of the AD administrative review                 (Zhaoqing II).                                            10 See Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d 337
                                                                                                         5 Id., 256 F. Supp. 3d at 1337.                     (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
                                              of the antidumping duty order on PSF                       6 See Viraj Grp, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d       11 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
                                              from China and that Commerce is                         1371, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2003).                           United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
                                              amending the final results with respect                    7 Final Results, 78 FR at 2368, and accompanying    (Diamond Sawblades).
                                              to the AD cash deposit rate assigned to                 IDM at Comment 2.                                         12 See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:57 Dec 13, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00020   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM     14DEN1



Document Created: 2018-12-14 03:50:16
Document Modified: 2018-12-14 03:50:16
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable December 14, 2018.
ContactMary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785.
FR Citation83 FR 64329 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR