83 FR 6475 - Greater-Than-Class C and Transuranic Waste

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 31 (February 14, 2018)

Page Range		6475-6477
FR Document		2018-03085
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking stakeholder participation and involvement in identifying the various technical issues that should be considered in the development of a regulatory basis for the disposal of Greater-than-Class C (GTCC) and transuranic radioactive waste through means other than a deep geologic disposal, including near surface disposal. To assist in this process, the NRC is holding a public meeting and is requesting that stakeholders respond to the questions discussed in Section IV, ``Specific Request for Comments,'' of this document.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6475-6477]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03085]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 6475]]



NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 61

[NRC-2017-0081]
RIN 3150-AK00


Greater-Than-Class C and Transuranic Waste

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Public meeting; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking 
stakeholder participation and involvement in identifying the various 
technical issues that should be considered in the development of a 
regulatory basis for the disposal of Greater-than-Class C (GTCC) and 
transuranic radioactive waste through means other than a deep geologic 
disposal, including near surface disposal. To assist in this process, 
the NRC is holding a public meeting and is requesting that stakeholders 
respond to the questions discussed in Section IV, ``Specific Request 
for Comments,'' of this document.

DATES: Submit comments by April 16, 2018. Comments received after this 
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is 
only able to ensure consideration of comments received on or before 
this date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods 
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting 
comments on a specific subject):
     Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0081. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions contact 
the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 
of this document.
     Email comments to: [email protected]. If you do 
not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact 
us at 301-415-1677.
     Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission at 301-415-1101.
     Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and 
Adjudications Staff.
     Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EST) Federal workdays; 
telephone: 301-415-1677.
    For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting 
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cardelia H. Maupin, Office of Nuclear 
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-4127; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments

A. Obtaining Information

    Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0081 when contacting the NRC 
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain 
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the 
following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0081.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected].
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

B. Submitting Comments

    Please include Docket ID NRC-2017-0081 in the subject line of your 
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make 
your comment submission available to the public in this docket. If your 
comment contains proprietary or sensitive information, please contact 
the individual listed in the FOR INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 
document to determine the most appropriate method for submitting your 
comment.
    The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact 
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your 
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at 
https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions 
into ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to 
remove identifying or contact information.
    If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons 
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to 
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be 
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should 
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to 
remove such information before making the comment submissions available 
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.

II. Discussion

    On December 22, 2015, the Commission, in Staff Requirements 
Memorandum (SRM)-SECY-15-0094, ``Historical and Current Issues Related 
to Disposal of GTCC Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW)'' (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML15356A623), directed the NRC staff to develop a 
regulatory basis for disposal of GTCC and transuranic waste through 
means other than a deep geologic disposal, including near surface 
disposal, within six months of the completion of the final rule for 
part 61 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Low-
Level Radioactive Waste Disposal,'' RIN 3150-AI92; Docket ID NRC-2011-
0012. The Commission also directed the staff to conduct a public 
workshop during the development of the regulatory basis to receive 
input from stakeholders. On

[[Page 6476]]

September 8, 2017, the Commission, in SRM-SECY-16-0106, ``Final Rule: 
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal (10 CFR part 61) (RIN 3150-AI92)'' 
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17251B147), revised its earlier directions 
regarding the development of the GTCC and transuranic waste regulatory 
basis. The Commission directed the staff to develop the regulatory 
basis six months after the publication of the supplemental proposed 
rule for the 10 CFR part 61 rulemaking.
    The NRC staff is in the initial phase of implementing the 
Commission's directions in SRM-SECY-15-0094 and SRM-SECY-16-0106. The 
process of potentially amending the NRC's regulations is very 
thoughtful and deliberative because it can have significant impacts on 
members of the public, States, licensees, and other stakeholders. The 
regulatory basis describes the various scientific, technical, and legal 
issues associated with a potential rulemaking. Therefore, as a part of 
the initial steps in implementing the Commission's directions, the 
staff has planned a public meeting with stakeholders to identify the 
various technical issues that should be considered in the development 
of a regulatory basis for the disposal of GTCC and transuranic waste. 
The staff is also requesting that stakeholders respond to the questions 
discussed in Section IV, ``Specific Request for Comments,'' of this 
notice. When this initial phase is completed, staff plans to develop a 
regulatory basis, which will be provided for public review. Staff plans 
to hold public meetings on the draft regulatory basis as well. After 
which, the staff will develop a final regulatory basis.

III. Background

    The NRC's ``Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive 
Waste'' are provided in 10 CFR part 61. Section 10 CFR 61.2, 
``Definitions,'' provides that waste as used in part 61 means those 
low-level radioactive wastes containing source, special nuclear, or 
byproduct material that are acceptable for disposal in a land disposal 
facility. The definition also indicates that low-level radioactive 
waste means radioactive waste not classified as high-level radioactive 
waste, transuranic waste, spent nuclear fuel, or byproduct material as 
defined in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of the definition of byproduct 
material in Sec.  20.1003.
    The Statements of Consideration (SOC) for the 10 CFR part 61 
proposed rule explained that not all waste may be suitable for disposal 
in the near surface. Specifically, Section IV Purpose and Scope of the 
SOC (46 FR 38082; July 24, 1981) indicates that, while 10 CFR part 61 
was intended to deal with the disposal of most LLRW defined by the Low-
Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, the 10 CFR part 61`waste 
classification system identified some LLRW that are not suitable for 
disposal under its regulatory framework, and alternative methods would 
have to be used.
    In Sec.  61.55, ``Waste classification,'' the NRC developed a 
classification system for waste for near surface disposal, which 
categorizes waste as Class A, B, or C. This provision also describes 
waste that is not generally acceptable for near-surface disposal, whose 
disposal methods must be more stringent than those specified for Class 
C waste. This waste is referred to as GTCC waste.
    The GTCC waste is generated by nuclear power reactors, facilities 
supporting the nuclear fuel cycle, and other facilities and licensees 
outside of the nuclear fuel cycle. This class of wastes include (1) 
plutonium-contaminated nuclear fuel cycle wastes; (2) activated metals; 
(3) sealed sources; and (4) radioisotope product manufacturing wastes 
(i.e., wastes ``occasionally generated as part of manufacture of sealed 
sources, radiopharmaceutical products and other materials used for 
industrial, education, and medical applications'').
    With regards to transuranic waste, as mentioned earlier, 
transuranic waste is not included in the Sec.  61.2 definition of LLRW. 
In a 1988 amendment to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, a 
definition for transuranic was added. Transuranic waste \1\ is defined 
as ``material contaminated with elements that have an atomic number 
greater than 92, including neptunium, plutonium, americium, and curium, 
and that are in concentrations greater than 10 nanocuries per gram 
[(nCi/g)], or in such other concentrations as the [U.S.] Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission may prescribe to protect the public health and 
safety.'' Transuranic waste is a byproduct of nuclear research and 
power production and is primarily produced from spent fuel recycling, 
medical isotope production, or nuclear weapons fabrication. The waste 
may consist of rags, tools, and laboratory equipment contaminated with 
organic and inorganic residues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Defense waste containing more than 100 nCi of alpha emitting 
transuranic isotopes per gram of waste, with half-lives greater than 
20 years can be disposed of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The identification and evaluation of regulatory concerns associated 
with land disposal of GTCC and transuranic waste will largely depend on 
the characteristics of the wastes (e.g., isotopes, concentrations and 
volumes of waste, physical and chemical properties). The variable 
characteristics of the waste can influence the decision regarding the 
appropriate regulatory approach to use for management and disposal of 
these wastes. Overly conservative assumptions for the inventory and 
characteristics could significantly limit disposal options, whereas, 
overly optimistic assumptions with respect to characteristics could 
lead to a disposal facility that may not provide adequate protection of 
public health and safety, and security.

IV. Specific Request for Comment

    The NRC is seeking stakeholder participation and involvement in 
identifying the various technical issues that should be considered in 
the development of a draft regulatory basis for the disposal of GTCC 
and transuranic radioactive waste through means other than a deep 
geologic disposal, including near surface disposal. To assist in this 
process, the NRC staff is requesting that stakeholders respond to the 
questions below. In addition, the NRC staff has conducted some initial 
technical analyses to assist its understanding of potential hazards 
with near surface disposal of GTCC and transuranic wastes, which are 
contained in draft ``NRC Staff Analyses Identifying Potential Issues 
Associated with the Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level 
Radioactive Waste,'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML17362A012). The draft 
analyses should assist in providing responses to the following 
questions:
    Question 1: What are the important radionuclides that need to be 
considered for the disposal of the GTCC and transuranic wastes?
    The U.S. Department of Energy has described three broad categories 
of GTCC wastes, including a range of transuranic radionuclides, in its 
``Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Greater-
Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC-Like Waste'' 
(http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov/documents/index.cfm). The three categories 
are entitled activated metals, sealed sources, and other wastes. The 
attributes (e.g., radionuclide concentrations, heat generation, and 
waste form) vary significantly between the three categories. Certain 
waste streams represent a very specific waste form (e.g., stainless 
steel for most activated metals; very concentrated amounts in sealed 
sources) that may require specific treatment to mitigate potential 
safety, security and criticality concerns. Some

[[Page 6477]]

waste streams may contain sufficient quantities of specific 
radionuclides that will present a significant thermal output and/or gas 
generation through radiolysis. Still other waste streams may contain a 
significant quantity of fissile radionuclides (e.g., some isotopes of 
uranium and plutonium). The NRC is interested in identifying those 
radionuclides that could be important for evaluating the safety and 
security of: (1) Storage associated with the operational period at a 
disposal facility, and (2) the post-closure period, including 
inadvertent intruder protection. Additionally, the NRC is interested in 
obtaining available data and information to support the characteristics 
of GTCC and transuranic wastes.
    Question 2: How might GTCC and transuranic wastes affect the safety 
and security of a disposal facility during operations (i.e., pre-
closure period)?
    The presence of sufficient quantities of high activity 
radionuclides and/or fissile radionuclides in GTCC and transuranic 
wastes may impact the design and operational activities associated with 
a disposal facility prior to disposal. The NRC is interested in 
identifying those design and operational activities at a disposal 
facility that may be impacted by GTCC and transuranic wastes. For 
example, the requirements in 10 CFR part 73 would require licensees to 
develop safeguards systems to protect against acts of radiological 
sabotage and to prevent the theft or diversion of Special Nuclear 
Material (i.e., transuranic waste such as plutonium, uranium-233, or 
uranium enriched in the isotopes uranium-233 or uranium-235) if a 
sufficient amount of Special Nuclear Material were present above ground 
at the disposal facility.
    Question 3: How might GTCC and transuranic wastes affect disposal 
facility design for post-closure safety including protection of an 
inadvertent intruder?
    The NRC is considering disposal units (e.g., a single trench, 
borehole, and vault) that would contain a single category of waste 
(e.g., sealed sources) as well as disposal units that contain a mixture 
of all three waste types. However, the NRC believes the best approach 
for understanding the issues would be to assume that waste within a 
disposal unit would be separated by the waste category and not be co-
mingled. Such an approach could provide a clear understanding of the 
issues associated with how a specific waste category might affect 
disposal facility design. Certain waste streams associated with GTCC 
and transuranic wastes have larger inventories and concentrations of 
radionuclides than was typically considered at LLRW disposal 
facilities. For example, certain GTCC and transuranic wastes in 
sufficient quantities have the potential for: (1) Significant thermal 
output that could affect degradation processes within a disposal unit, 
and (2) hydrogen gas generation through radiolysis that could also 
affect degradation processes of the waste package and waste form. 
Additionally, waste streams associated with GTCC and transuranic wastes 
may have fissile materials that require facilities to be designed to 
limit the potential for a criticality event or limit the amount of 
fissile material that can be disposed. There is a potential balance 
between security/safety and economic feasibility of design, 
construction, and operation. The NRC would like to hear from the 
stakeholders on these aspects as well. The information provided on 
economic feasibility would be in concert with the NRC's strategies on 
examining the cumulative effects of potential regulatory actions. The 
NRC is interested in identifying the various scenarios that should be 
considered in evaluating the post-closure safety for the disposal of 
GTCC and transuranic wastes especially scenarios associated with 
specific issues and concerns that may not have been previously 
considered for commercial disposal facilities (e.g., synergistic 
effects of the thermal output on geochemical processes affecting 
release of radionuclides).

V. Public Meeting

    To facilitate the understanding of the public and other 
stakeholders of these issues and the submission of comments, the NRC 
staff has scheduled a public meeting for February 22, 2018, from 1:00 
p.m. to 3:00 p.m. (EST) in the NRC Auditorium at 11545 Rockville, Pike, 
Rockville, MD. In addition, those wishing to participate by Webinar 
will be able to view the presentation slides prepared by the NRC and 
electronically submit comments during the meeting. Participants must 
register to participate in the Webinar. Registration information may be 
found in the meeting notice (https://www.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg?do=details&Code=20180033). The meeting notice can also be accessed 
through the NRC's public website under the headings Public Meetings & 
Involvement > Public Meeting Schedule; see web page https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/index.cfm.
    Additionally, the final agenda for the public meeting will be 
posted no fewer than 10 days prior to the Webinar at this website. 
Those who are unable to participate in person or via Webinar may also 
participate via teleconference. For details on how to participate via 
teleconference, please contact Sarah Achten; telephone: 301-415-6009; 
email: [email protected].

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this day of February 9, 2018.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gregory F. Suber,
Acting Deputy Director, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, 
and Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2018-03085 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
6476 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules

September 8, 2017, the Commission, in Scope of the SOC (46 FR 38082; July 24, waste will largely depend on the
SRM–SECY–16–0106, ‘‘Final Rule: Low- 1981) indicates that, while 10 CFR part characteristics of the wastes (e.g.,
Level Radioactive Waste Disposal (10 61 was intended to deal with the isotopes, concentrations and volumes of
CFR part 61) (RIN 3150–AI92)’’ disposal of most LLRW defined by the waste, physical and chemical
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17251B147), Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy properties). The variable characteristics
revised its earlier directions regarding Act, the 10 CFR part 61‘waste of the waste can influence the decision
the development of the GTCC and classification system identified some regarding the appropriate regulatory
transuranic waste regulatory basis. The LLRW that are not suitable for disposal approach to use for management and
Commission directed the staff to under its regulatory framework, and disposal of these wastes. Overly
develop the regulatory basis six months alternative methods would have to be conservative assumptions for the
after the publication of the used. inventory and characteristics could
supplemental proposed rule for the 10 In § 61.55, ‘‘Waste classification,’’ the significantly limit disposal options,
CFR part 61 rulemaking. NRC developed a classification system whereas, overly optimistic assumptions
The NRC staff is in the initial phase for waste for near surface disposal, with respect to characteristics could
of implementing the Commission’s which categorizes waste as Class A, B, lead to a disposal facility that may not
directions in SRM–SECY–15–0094 and or C. This provision also describes provide adequate protection of public
SRM–SECY–16–0106. The process of waste that is not generally acceptable for health and safety, and security.
potentially amending the NRC’s near-surface disposal, whose disposal
regulations is very thoughtful and IV. Specific Request for Comment
methods must be more stringent than
deliberative because it can have those specified for Class C waste. This The NRC is seeking stakeholder
significant impacts on members of the waste is referred to as GTCC waste. participation and involvement in
public, States, licensees, and other The GTCC waste is generated by identifying the various technical issues
stakeholders. The regulatory basis nuclear power reactors, facilities that should be considered in the
describes the various scientific, supporting the nuclear fuel cycle, and development of a draft regulatory basis
technical, and legal issues associated other facilities and licensees outside of for the disposal of GTCC and
with a potential rulemaking. Therefore, the nuclear fuel cycle. This class of transuranic radioactive waste through
as a part of the initial steps in wastes include (1) plutonium- means other than a deep geologic
implementing the Commission’s contaminated nuclear fuel cycle wastes; disposal, including near surface
directions, the staff has planned a (2) activated metals; (3) sealed sources; disposal. To assist in this process, the
public meeting with stakeholders to and (4) radioisotope product NRC staff is requesting that stakeholders
identify the various technical issues that manufacturing wastes (i.e., wastes respond to the questions below. In
should be considered in the ‘‘occasionally generated as part of addition, the NRC staff has conducted
development of a regulatory basis for manufacture of sealed sources, some initial technical analyses to assist
the disposal of GTCC and transuranic radiopharmaceutical products and other its understanding of potential hazards
waste. The staff is also requesting that materials used for industrial, education, with near surface disposal of GTCC and
stakeholders respond to the questions and medical applications’’). transuranic wastes, which are contained
discussed in Section IV, ‘‘Specific With regards to transuranic waste, as in draft ‘‘NRC Staff Analyses Identifying
Request for Comments,’’ of this notice. mentioned earlier, transuranic waste is Potential Issues Associated with the
When this initial phase is completed, not included in the § 61.2 definition of Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-
staff plans to develop a regulatory basis, LLRW. In a 1988 amendment to the Level Radioactive Waste,’’ (ADAMS
which will be provided for public Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Accession No. ML17362A012). The
review. Staff plans to hold public draft analyses should assist in providing
a definition for transuranic was added.
meetings on the draft regulatory basis as responses to the following questions:
Transuranic waste 1 is defined as
well. After which, the staff will develop Question 1: What are the important
‘‘material contaminated with elements radionuclides that need to be
a final regulatory basis. that have an atomic number greater than considered for the disposal of the GTCC
III. Background 92, including neptunium, plutonium, and transuranic wastes?
The NRC’s ‘‘Licensing Requirements americium, and curium, and that are in The U.S. Department of Energy has
for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste’’ concentrations greater than 10 described three broad categories of
are provided in 10 CFR part 61. Section nanocuries per gram [(nCi/g)], or in such GTCC wastes, including a range of
10 CFR 61.2, ‘‘Definitions,’’ provides other concentrations as the [U.S.] transuranic radionuclides, in its ‘‘Final
that waste as used in part 61 means Nuclear Regulatory Commission may Environmental Impact Statement for the
those low-level radioactive wastes prescribe to protect the public health Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C
containing source, special nuclear, or and safety.’’ Transuranic waste is a (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste
byproduct material that are acceptable byproduct of nuclear research and and GTCC-Like Waste’’ (http://
for disposal in a land disposal facility. power production and is primarily www.gtcceis.anl.gov/documents/
The definition also indicates that low- produced from spent fuel recycling, index.cfm). The three categories are
level radioactive waste means medical isotope production, or nuclear entitled activated metals, sealed
radioactive waste not classified as high- weapons fabrication. The waste may sources, and other wastes. The attributes
level radioactive waste, transuranic consist of rags, tools, and laboratory (e.g., radionuclide concentrations, heat
waste, spent nuclear fuel, or byproduct equipment contaminated with organic generation, and waste form) vary
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

material as defined in paragraphs (2), and inorganic residues. significantly between the three
(3), and (4) of the definition of The identification and evaluation of categories. Certain waste streams
byproduct material in § 20.1003. regulatory concerns associated with represent a very specific waste form
The Statements of Consideration land disposal of GTCC and transuranic (e.g., stainless steel for most activated
(SOC) for the 10 CFR part 61 proposed 1 Defense waste containing more than 100 nCi of
metals; very concentrated amounts in
rule explained that not all waste may be alpha emitting transuranic isotopes per gram of
sealed sources) that may require specific
suitable for disposal in the near surface. waste, with half-lives greater than 20 years can be treatment to mitigate potential safety,
Specifically, Section IV Purpose and disposed of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. security and criticality concerns. Some

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14FEP1.SGM 14FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules 6477

waste streams may contain sufficient concentrations of radionuclides than participate in person or via Webinar
quantities of specific radionuclides that was typically considered at LLRW may also participate via teleconference.
will present a significant thermal output disposal facilities. For example, certain For details on how to participate via
and/or gas generation through GTCC and transuranic wastes in teleconference, please contact Sarah
radiolysis. Still other waste streams may sufficient quantities have the potential Achten; telephone: 301–415–6009;
contain a significant quantity of fissile for: (1) Significant thermal output that email: Sarah.Achten@nrc.gov.
radionuclides (e.g., some isotopes of could affect degradation processes Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this day of
uranium and plutonium). The NRC is within a disposal unit, and (2) hydrogen February 9, 2018.
interested in identifying those gas generation through radiolysis that For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
radionuclides that could be important could also affect degradation processes
Gregory F. Suber,
for evaluating the safety and security of: of the waste package and waste form.
(1) Storage associated with the Additionally, waste streams associated Acting Deputy Director, Division of
Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and
operational period at a disposal facility, with GTCC and transuranic wastes may Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material
and (2) the post-closure period, have fissile materials that require Safety and Safeguards.
including inadvertent intruder facilities to be designed to limit the [FR Doc. 2018–03085 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am]
protection. Additionally, the NRC is potential for a criticality event or limit
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
interested in obtaining available data the amount of fissile material that can
and information to support the be disposed. There is a potential balance
characteristics of GTCC and transuranic between security/safety and economic
wastes. feasibility of design, construction, and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Question 2: How might GTCC and operation. The NRC would like to hear
transuranic wastes affect the safety and from the stakeholders on these aspects Federal Aviation Administration
security of a disposal facility during as well. The information provided on
operations (i.e., pre-closure period)? economic feasibility would be in 14 CFR Part 39
The presence of sufficient quantities concert with the NRC’s strategies on [Docket No. FAA–2018–0078; Product
of high activity radionuclides and/or examining the cumulative effects of Identifier 2017–NM–107–AD]
fissile radionuclides in GTCC and potential regulatory actions. The NRC is
transuranic wastes may impact the RIN 2120–AA64
interested in identifying the various
design and operational activities scenarios that should be considered in Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
associated with a disposal facility prior evaluating the post-closure safety for the Company Airplanes
to disposal. The NRC is interested in disposal of GTCC and transuranic
identifying those design and operational wastes especially scenarios associated AGENCY: Federal Aviation
activities at a disposal facility that may with specific issues and concerns that Administration (FAA), DOT.
be impacted by GTCC and transuranic may not have been previously ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
wastes. For example, the requirements considered for commercial disposal (NPRM).
in 10 CFR part 73 would require facilities (e.g., synergistic effects of the
licensees to develop safeguards systems thermal output on geochemical SUMMARY: We propose to supersede
to protect against acts of radiological processes affecting release of Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017–01–
sabotage and to prevent the theft or radionuclides). 02, which applies to certain The Boeing
diversion of Special Nuclear Material Company Model 787–8 and 787–9
(i.e., transuranic waste such as V. Public Meeting
airplanes. AD 2017–01–02 requires an
plutonium, uranium-233, or uranium To facilitate the understanding of the inspection for discrepant inboard and
enriched in the isotopes uranium-233 or public and other stakeholders of these outboard trailing edge flap rotary
uranium-235) if a sufficient amount of issues and the submission of comments, actuators. Since we issued AD 2017–01–
Special Nuclear Material were present the NRC staff has scheduled a public 02, we have determined that it is
above ground at the disposal facility. meeting for February 22, 2018, from necessary to revise the applicability to
Question 3: How might GTCC and 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. (EST) in the NRC include additional airplanes, and to
transuranic wastes affect disposal Auditorium at 11545 Rockville, Pike, reduce the number of affected actuators.
facility design for post-closure safety Rockville, MD. In addition, those This proposed AD would continue to
including protection of an inadvertent wishing to participate by Webinar will require an inspection of the inboard and
intruder? be able to view the presentation slides outboard trailing edge flap rotary
The NRC is considering disposal units prepared by the NRC and electronically actuator for any discrepant rotary
(e.g., a single trench, borehole, and submit comments during the meeting. actuator, and corrective actions if
vault) that would contain a single Participants must register to participate necessary. We are proposing this AD to
category of waste (e.g., sealed sources) in the Webinar. Registration information address the unsafe condition on these
as well as disposal units that contain a may be found in the meeting notice products.
mixture of all three waste types. (https://www.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg?do=
However, the NRC believes the best details&Code=20180033). The meeting DATES: We must receive comments on
approach for understanding the issues notice can also be accessed through the this proposed AD by April 2, 2018.
would be to assume that waste within NRC’s public website under the ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
a disposal unit would be separated by headings Public Meetings & using the procedures found in 14 CFR
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

the waste category and not be co- Involvement > Public Meeting 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
mingled. Such an approach could Schedule; see web page https:// methods:
provide a clear understanding of the www.nrc.gov/public-involve/ • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
issues associated with how a specific publicmeetings/index.cfm. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
waste category might affect disposal Additionally, the final agenda for the instructions for submitting comments.
facility design. Certain waste streams public meeting will be posted no fewer • Fax: 202–493–2251.
associated with GTCC and transuranic than 10 days prior to the Webinar at this • Mail: U.S. Department of
wastes have larger inventories and website. Those who are unable to Transportation, Docket Operations, M–

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14FEP1.SGM 14FEP1
Document Created: 2018-02-14 03:59:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 03:59:36
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Public meeting; request for comment.
Dates		Submit comments by April 16, 2018. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is only able to ensure consideration of comments received on or before this date.
Contact		Cardelia H. Maupin, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-4127; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 6475
RIN Number		3150-AK00