83 FR 6513 - Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 31 (February 14, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 31 (February 14, 2018)
| Page Range | 6513-6515 | |
| FR Document | 2018-02915 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 6513-6515] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-02915] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-985] Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deosen Biochemical Ltd./Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd. (collectively, Deosen) made sales of xanthan gum from the People's Republic of China (China) at prices below normal value (NV) and that Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd./Shandong Fufeng Fermentation Co., Ltd./ Xinjiang Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, Fufeng) did not. We continue to find that the four companies which were not selected for individual examination have demonstrated their eligibility for separate rates in the final results. These four companies are CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited (CP Kelco Shandong, Jianlong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd.) (Jianlong), Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd./Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, Meihua), and Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Smart). We also continue to find that A.H.A. International Co., Ltd. (AHA) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR), i.e., July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Michael Bowen, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-0768, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 7, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ For events occurring subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 36746 (August 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum, ``Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce's practice, the deadline will become the next business day. The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now February 6, 2018.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum) dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order \4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The product covered by the order includes dry xanthan gum, whether or not coated or blended with other products. Xanthan gum is included in this order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground fiber. Merchandise covered by the scope of the order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document, and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic copy of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made one change to our preliminary calculation of the weighed-average dumping margin for the mandatory respondent, Fufeng.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that AHA had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\6\ As we have not received any information to contradict our preliminary finding, we determine that AHA had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, and we intend to issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that are consistent with our ``automatic assessment'' clarification for these final results of review.7 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 36746. \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Notice); see also ``Assessment Rates'' section of this notice. \8\ For any shipment made by Deosen during the POR, which involved AHA, we intend to liquidate those entries at Deosen's importer-specific assessment rate. See Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that two mandatory respondents, Deosen and Fufeng, and four other companies \9\ not selected for individual review demonstrated their eligibility for separate rates. We continue to find that these six companies, listed in the table in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice, are eligible for separate rate status. We [[Page 6514]] assigned the non-selected companies a weighted-average dumping margin of 9.30 percent--the rate calculated for Deosen in this review.\10\ Fufeng has a weighted-average margin of zero; accordingly, no antidumping duty liability will apply to Fufeng for the POR. Additionally, the Department relied, in part, on facts otherwise available with an adverse inference pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act in determining Deosen's weighted-average dumping margin for the POR. See Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ These four companies are: CP Kelco Shandong, Jianlong, Meihua, and Shanghai Smart. \10\ See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 39467 (July 3, 2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporters dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deosen Biochemical Ltd./Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd.. 9.30 Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (aka Inner 0.00 Mongolia Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.)/Shandong Fufeng Fermentation Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd............................... CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited.......... 9.30 Jianlong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (aka Inner Mongolia 9.30 Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd.)........................ Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/ 9.30 Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd............................. Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co., Ltd....................... 9.30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these final results of review. We intend to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results. For Deosen, which has a weighted-average dumping margin above zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total entered value of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For Fufeng, whose weighted-average dumping margin is zero, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the respondents which were not selected for individual examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate is equal to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Deosen, or 9.30 percent. Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice in non-market economy cases, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Deosen or Fufeng, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate.\11\ Additionally, as noted above, Commerce determines that AHA had no shipments of the subject merchandise during the POR. As a result, any suspended entries of subject merchandise from AHA (which do not involve Deosen) will be liquidated at the China-wide rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Assessment Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non- Chinese exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity, which is 154.07 percent; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter(s) that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). [[Page 6515]] Dated: February 6, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Separate Rate Status for Jianlong Comment 2: Separate Rate Status for Meihua Comment 3: Application of Partial Adverse Facts Available to Deosen Comment 4: Rate Assignment for Meihua Based on Its Voluntary Respondent Status Request Comment 5: Rate Assignment for Separate Rate Applicants Comment 6: Clerical Error Regarding Fufeng's U.S. Packing Expenses VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-02915 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices 6513
IX. Recommendation Background and is on file electronically via
[FR Doc. 2018–02898 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] On August 7, 2017, Commerce Enforcement and Compliance’s
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P published the Preliminary Results.1 For Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
events occurring subsequent to the Centralized Electronic Service System
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce registered users at http://
conducted this administrative review in access.trade.gov, and is available to all
International Trade Administration accordance with section 751 of the parties in the Central Records Unit,
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Room B8024 of the main Department of
[A–570–985] Commerce exercised its discretion to Commerce building. In addition, a
toll all deadlines affected by the closure complete version of the Issues and
Xanthan Gum From the People’s of the Federal Government from January Decision Memorandum can be accessed
Republic of China: Final Results of the 20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline directly on the internet at http://
Antidumping Duty Administrative falls on a non-business day, in enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper
Review and Final Determination of No accordance with Commerce’s practice, copy and electronic copy of the Issues
Shipments; 2015–2016 the deadline will become the next and Decision Memorandum are
business day. The revised deadline for identical in content.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, the final results of this review is now Changes Since the Preliminary Results
International Trade Administration, February 6, 2018.3
Based on a review of the record and
Department of Commerce. Scope of the Order 4 comments received from interested
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce The product covered by the order parties regarding our Preliminary
(Commerce) determines that Deosen includes dry xanthan gum, whether or Results, and for the reasons explained in
Biochemical Ltd./Deosen Biochemical not coated or blended with other the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
(Ordos) Ltd. (collectively, Deosen) made products. Xanthan gum is included in we made one change to our preliminary
sales of xanthan gum from the People’s this order regardless of physical form, calculation of the weighed-average
Republic of China (China) at prices including, but not limited to, solutions, dumping margin for the mandatory
below normal value (NV) and that slurries, dry powders of any particle respondent, Fufeng.5
Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., size, or unground fiber.
Merchandise covered by the scope of Final Determination of No Shipments
Ltd./Shandong Fufeng Fermentation
Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Fufeng the order is classified in the In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the determined that AHA had no shipments
Fufeng) did not. We continue to find United States at subheading 3913.90.20. of subject merchandise during the POR.6
This tariff classification is provided for As we have not received any
that the four companies which were not
convenience and customs purposes; information to contradict our
selected for individual examination
however, the written description of the preliminary finding, we determine that
have demonstrated their eligibility for scope is dispositive. AHA had no shipments of subject
separate rates in the final results. These
Analysis of Comments Received merchandise during the POR, and we
four companies are CP Kelco
intend to issue appropriate instructions
(Shandong) Biological Company All issues raised in the case and to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Limited (CP Kelco Shandong, Jianlong rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties (CBP) that are consistent with our
Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Inner are addressed in the Issues and Decision ‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification for
Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Memorandum, which is hereby adopted these final results of review.7 8
Ltd.) (Jianlong), Meihua Group by this notice. A list of the issues that
International Trading (Hong Kong) parties raised, and to which we Methodology
Limited/Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid responded in the Issues and Decision In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
Co., Ltd./Langfang Meihua Bio- Memorandum, follows as an appendix determined that two mandatory
Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, to this notice. The Issues and Decision respondents, Deosen and Fufeng, and
Meihua), and Shanghai Smart Memorandum is a public document, four other companies 9 not selected for
Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Smart). 1 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of
individual review demonstrated their
We also continue to find that A.H.A. China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
eligibility for separate rates. We
International Co., Ltd. (AHA) made no Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary continue to find that these six
shipments of subject merchandise Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR companies, listed in the table in the
36746 (August 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and ‘‘Final Results’’ section of this notice,
during the period of review (POR), i.e., accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Xanthan Gum from the
are eligible for separate rate status. We
People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision
DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018. Memorandum for the Final Results of the Third
5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated Comment 6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 6 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 36746.
concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Brian Smith or Michael Bowen, AD/ Memorandum). 7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
CVD Operations, Office VIII, 3 See Memorandum for The Record from Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
Enforcement and Compliance, Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- (Assessment Notice); see also ‘‘Assessment Rates’’
International Trade Administration, exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant section of this notice.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 8 For any shipment made by Deosen during the
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the POR, which involved AHA, we intend to liquidate
Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum) dated those entries at Deosen’s importer-specific
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1766 January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of assessment rate. See Issues and Decision
and (202) 482–0768, respectively. the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. Memorandum for further discussion.
4 A full description of the scope of the order is 9 These four companies are: CP Kelco Shandong,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Jianlong, Meihua, and Shanghai Smart.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_6544/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices 6515
Dated: February 6, 2018. Background for convenience and customs purposes,
Gary Taverman, On October 11, 2017, Commerce the written product description in the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping published its Preliminary Results of the Order remains dispositive.6
and Countervailing Duty Operations, review of the antidumping duty order
performing the non-exclusive functions and Analysis
on WBF from China for one mandatory
duties of the Assistant Secretary for As noted above, no parties
Enforcement and Compliance.
respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd.
(Decca), and twelve other companies commented on the Preliminary Results.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in covering the period January 1, 2016, Therefore, we are adopting the decisions
the Issues and Decision Memorandum through December 31, 2016 (the period in the Preliminary Decision
of review (POR)).1 No parties Memorandum for these final results of
I. Summary review. In the Preliminary Results,
II. Background commented on the Preliminary Results.
Commerce has exercised its discretion Commerce: (1) Determined that four
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results to toll deadlines for the duration of the companies, including Decca, did not
V. Discussion of the Issues closure of the Federal Government from establish their eligibility for a separate
Comment 1: Separate Rate Status for January 20 through 22, 2018. If the new rate and are part of the China-wide
Jianlong deadline falls on a non-business day, in entity; 7 (2) determined that eight
Comment 2: Separate Rate Status for accordance with Commerce’s practice, companies had no shipments of subject
Meihua the deadline will become the next merchandise; 8 and (3) rescinded the
Comment 3: Application of Partial Adverse business day. The revised deadline for review for Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork
Facts Available to Deosen Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial, Ltd.
Comment 4: Rate Assignment for Meihua
the final results of this review is now
February 15, 2018.2 (HK Ltd.) (collectively, Fortune Glory),
Based on Its Voluntary Respondent
Status Request
for whom all review requests were
Scope of the Order withdrawn.9 For these final results of
Comment 5: Rate Assignment for Separate
Rate Applicants The product covered by the Order is review, we have continued to treat the
Comment 6: Clerical Error Regarding wooden bedroom furniture, subject to four companies, including Decca, as
Fufeng’s U.S. Packing Expenses certain exceptions.3 Based on a U.S. part of the China-wide entity and have
VI. Recommendation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) continued to find that eight companies
[FR Doc. 2018–02915 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] ruling indicating that CBP would no had no shipments during the POR.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P longer use certain harmonized tariff Because no party requested a review of
schedule subheadings to classify items the China-wide entity, we are not
that are within the scope of the Order,4 conducting a review of the China-wide
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Commerce preliminarily revised the entity.10 Thus, there is no change to the
scope to include the harmonized tariff rate for the China-wide entity from the
International Trade Administration schedule numbers under which subject Preliminary Results. The existing rate
merchandise is entered.5 No parties
[A–570–890] commented on this revision. Hence, we 6 For a complete description of the scope of the
have adopted this revision in these final Order and a discussion of the revisions to the
HTSUS numbers in the scope, see Decision
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the results. Under this revision, imports of Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
People’s Republic of China: Final subject merchandise are classified under Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden
Results of Antidumping Duty the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
Administrative Review and Final United States (HTSUS) subheadings: China, from James Maeder, Senior Director,
performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, for Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
2016 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions
International Trade Administration, the HTSUS subheadings are provided
and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Department of Commerce. Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated October 11, 2017.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2017, the 1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 7 The other three companies are: (1) Changshu
Department of Commerce (Commerce) People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and HTC Import & Export Co., Ltd.; (2) Starwood
published its Preliminary Results for the Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Industries Ltd.; and (3) U-Rich Furniture
January 1, 2016, through December 31, Administrative Review and Preliminary (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd.; U-Rich Furniture Ltd.
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016, 82 FR 8 The eight companies/company groupings are:
2016, administrative review of the 47172 (October 11, 2017) (Preliminary Results). (1) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang
antidumping duty order on wooden 2 See Memorandum for The Record from
Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise
bedroom furniture (WBF) from the Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Furniture Co., Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (2) Dongguan
People’s Republic of China (China). Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood
exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Industry, Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmont Designs
Although invited to do so, interested Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co.,
parties did not comment on our ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Ltd.; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Eurosa
Preliminary Results. We have adopted Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Golden Well
the Preliminary Results as the final dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this International (HK) Limited; Zhangzhou Xym
segment of the proceeding have been extended by Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (5) RiZhao Sanmu
results. 3 days. Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Shining
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (7) Woodworth
DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; and (8)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 9 See Preliminary Results, at 47172.
Enforcement & Compliance, 2005) (Order). 10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
4 See letter from the petitioners, re: ‘‘Wooden
International Trade Administration, of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Bedroom Furniture from China: Petitioners’ Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Comments Regarding the Upcoming Preliminary Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Results,’’ dated August 29, 2017. Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593. 5 See Preliminary Results, at 47173. FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_6544/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 03:59:34
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 03:59:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable February 14, 2018. | |
| Contact | Brian Smith or Michael Bowen, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-0768, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 6513 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR