83 FR 6515 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 31 (February 14, 2018)

Page Range		6515-6516
FR Document		2018-02896

On October 11, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published its Preliminary Results for the January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, administrative review of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) from the People's Republic of China (China). Although invited to do so, interested parties did not comment on our Preliminary Results. We have adopted the Preliminary Results as the final results.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6515-6516]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published its Preliminary Results for the January 1, 2016, through 
December 31, 2016, administrative review of the antidumping duty order 
on wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) from the People's Republic of China 
(China). Although invited to do so, interested parties did not comment 
on our Preliminary Results. We have adopted the Preliminary Results as 
the final results.

DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-1593.

Background

    On October 11, 2017, Commerce published its Preliminary Results of 
the review of the antidumping duty order on WBF from China for one 
mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd. (Decca), and twelve other 
companies covering the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 
2016 (the period of review (POR)).\1\ No parties commented on the 
Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments in Part; 2016, 82 FR 47172 (October 11, 2017) (Preliminary 
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the 
duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 
through 22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in 
accordance with Commerce's practice, the deadline will become the next 
business day. The revised deadline for the final results of this review 
is now February 15, 2018.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of 
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been 
extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the Order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions.\3\ Based on a U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) ruling indicating that CBP would no longer use certain 
harmonized tariff schedule subheadings to classify items that are 
within the scope of the Order,\4\ Commerce preliminarily revised the 
scope to include the harmonized tariff schedule numbers under which 
subject merchandise is entered.\5\ No parties commented on this 
revision. Hence, we have adopted this revision in these final results. 
Under this revision, imports of subject merchandise are classified 
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 
subheadings: 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 
from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) 
(Order).
    \4\ See letter from the petitioners, re: ``Wooden Bedroom 
Furniture from China: Petitioners' Comments Regarding the Upcoming 
Preliminary Results,'' dated August 29, 2017.
    \5\ See Preliminary Results, at 47173.
    \6\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order and a 
discussion of the revisions to the HTSUS numbers in the scope, see 
Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China, from James Maeder, Senior Director, 
performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 
Duty and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum), dated October 11, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis

    As noted above, no parties commented on the Preliminary Results. 
Therefore, we are adopting the decisions in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum for these final results of review. In the Preliminary 
Results, Commerce: (1) Determined that four companies, including Decca, 
did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate and are part of 
the China-wide entity; \7\ (2) determined that eight companies had no 
shipments of subject merchandise; \8\ and (3) rescinded the review for 
Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial, Ltd. (HK 
Ltd.) (collectively, Fortune Glory), for whom all review requests were 
withdrawn.\9\ For these final results of review, we have continued to 
treat the four companies, including Decca, as part of the China-wide 
entity and have continued to find that eight companies had no shipments 
during the POR. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide 
entity, we are not conducting a review of the China-wide entity.\10\ 
Thus, there is no change to the rate for the China-wide entity from the 
Preliminary Results. The existing rate

[[Page 6516]]

for the China-wide entity is 216.01 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The other three companies are: (1) Changshu HTC Import & 
Export Co., Ltd.; (2) Starwood Industries Ltd.; and (3) U-Rich 
Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd.; U-Rich Furniture Ltd.
    \8\ The eight companies/company groupings are: (1) Dongguan 
Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., 
Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (2) Dongguan 
Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., 
Taicang Fairmont Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Eurosa 
Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Golden Well International (HK) 
Limited; Zhangzhou Xym Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (5) RiZhao Sanmu 
Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., 
Ltd.; (7) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; and (8) 
Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
    \9\ See Preliminary Results, at 47172.
    \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 
4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For additional details, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
which is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and the electronic 
versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and 
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of 
subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this 
review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 
days after the publication date of the final results of this review. 
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of subject 
merchandise exported during this POR by Decca and the other three 
companies noted above which did not qualify for separate rate status, 
at the China-wide rate.
    Additionally, pursuant to Commerce's practice in NME cases, if 
there are any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR 
under the case numbers of the eight companies that claimed no shipments 
of subject merchandise, they will be liquidated at the China-wide 
rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the 
Federal Register of the final results of this review, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or 
reviewed China and non-China exporters which are not under review in 
this segment of the proceeding but which received a separate rate in a 
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all China exporters 
of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-China 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese 
exporter that supplied that non-China exporter.
    These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation that is subject to sanction.
    This notice of the final results of this antidumping duty 
administrative review is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: January 24, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-02896 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices 6515

Dated: February 6, 2018. Background for convenience and customs purposes,
Gary Taverman, On October 11, 2017, Commerce the written product description in the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping published its Preliminary Results of the Order remains dispositive.6
and Countervailing Duty Operations, review of the antidumping duty order
performing the non-exclusive functions and Analysis
on WBF from China for one mandatory
duties of the Assistant Secretary for As noted above, no parties
Enforcement and Compliance.
respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd.
(Decca), and twelve other companies commented on the Preliminary Results.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in covering the period January 1, 2016, Therefore, we are adopting the decisions
the Issues and Decision Memorandum through December 31, 2016 (the period in the Preliminary Decision
of review (POR)).1 No parties Memorandum for these final results of
I. Summary review. In the Preliminary Results,
II. Background commented on the Preliminary Results.
Commerce has exercised its discretion Commerce: (1) Determined that four
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results to toll deadlines for the duration of the companies, including Decca, did not
V. Discussion of the Issues closure of the Federal Government from establish their eligibility for a separate
Comment 1: Separate Rate Status for January 20 through 22, 2018. If the new rate and are part of the China-wide
Jianlong deadline falls on a non-business day, in entity; 7 (2) determined that eight
Comment 2: Separate Rate Status for accordance with Commerce’s practice, companies had no shipments of subject
Meihua the deadline will become the next merchandise; 8 and (3) rescinded the
Comment 3: Application of Partial Adverse business day. The revised deadline for review for Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork
Facts Available to Deosen Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial, Ltd.
Comment 4: Rate Assignment for Meihua
the final results of this review is now
February 15, 2018.2 (HK Ltd.) (collectively, Fortune Glory),
Based on Its Voluntary Respondent
Status Request
for whom all review requests were
Scope of the Order withdrawn.9 For these final results of
Comment 5: Rate Assignment for Separate
Rate Applicants The product covered by the Order is review, we have continued to treat the
Comment 6: Clerical Error Regarding wooden bedroom furniture, subject to four companies, including Decca, as
Fufeng’s U.S. Packing Expenses certain exceptions.3 Based on a U.S. part of the China-wide entity and have
VI. Recommendation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) continued to find that eight companies
[FR Doc. 2018–02915 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] ruling indicating that CBP would no had no shipments during the POR.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P longer use certain harmonized tariff Because no party requested a review of
schedule subheadings to classify items the China-wide entity, we are not
that are within the scope of the Order,4 conducting a review of the China-wide
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Commerce preliminarily revised the entity.10 Thus, there is no change to the
scope to include the harmonized tariff rate for the China-wide entity from the
International Trade Administration schedule numbers under which subject Preliminary Results. The existing rate
merchandise is entered.5 No parties
[A–570–890] commented on this revision. Hence, we 6 For a complete description of the scope of the

have adopted this revision in these final Order and a discussion of the revisions to the
HTSUS numbers in the scope, see Decision
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the results. Under this revision, imports of Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
People’s Republic of China: Final subject merchandise are classified under Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden
Results of Antidumping Duty the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
Administrative Review and Final United States (HTSUS) subheadings: China, from James Maeder, Senior Director,
performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, for Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
2016 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions
International Trade Administration, the HTSUS subheadings are provided
and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Department of Commerce. Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated October 11, 2017.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2017, the 1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 7 The other three companies are: (1) Changshu
Department of Commerce (Commerce) People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and HTC Import & Export Co., Ltd.; (2) Starwood
published its Preliminary Results for the Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Industries Ltd.; and (3) U-Rich Furniture
January 1, 2016, through December 31, Administrative Review and Preliminary (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd.; U-Rich Furniture Ltd.
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016, 82 FR 8 The eight companies/company groupings are:
2016, administrative review of the 47172 (October 11, 2017) (Preliminary Results). (1) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang
antidumping duty order on wooden 2 See Memorandum for The Record from
Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise
bedroom furniture (WBF) from the Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Furniture Co., Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (2) Dongguan
People’s Republic of China (China). Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood
exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Industry, Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmont Designs
Although invited to do so, interested Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co.,
parties did not comment on our ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Ltd.; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Eurosa
Preliminary Results. We have adopted Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Golden Well
the Preliminary Results as the final dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this International (HK) Limited; Zhangzhou Xym
segment of the proceeding have been extended by Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (5) RiZhao Sanmu
results. 3 days. Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Shining
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (7) Woodworth
DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; and (8)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 9 See Preliminary Results, at 47172.

Enforcement & Compliance, 2005) (Order). 10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
4 See letter from the petitioners, re: ‘‘Wooden
International Trade Administration, of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Bedroom Furniture from China: Petitioners’ Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Comments Regarding the Upcoming Preliminary Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Results,’’ dated August 29, 2017. Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593. 5 See Preliminary Results, at 47173. FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1

6516 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices

for the China-wide entity is 216.01 segment of this proceeding, the cash DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
percent. deposit rate will continue to be the
For additional details, see the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all International Trade Administration
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, China exporters of subject merchandise [A–489–805]
which is a public document and is on that have not been found to be entitled
file electronically via Enforcement and to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final
Compliance’s Antidumping and will be the rate for the China-wide Results and Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Centralized entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) Antidumping Duty Administrative
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Review; 2015–2016
for all non-China exporters of subject
ACCESS is available to registered users
merchandise which have not received AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
at http://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of their own rate, the cash deposit rate will International Trade Administration,
the main Department of Commerce be the rate applicable to the Chinese Department of Commerce.
building. In addition, a complete exporter that supplied that non-China SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
version of the Preliminary Results exporter. (Commerce) determines that Mutlu
Decision Memorandum can be accessed These deposit requirements, when Makarnacilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
directly on the internet at http:// imposed, shall remain in effect until (Mutlu), an exporter of certain pasta
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. further notice. (pasta) from Turkey and the sole
The signed and the electronic versions respondent subject to this
of the Preliminary Decision Notification to Interested Parties administrative review, had no bona fide
Memorandum are identical in content. sales during the period of review (POR)
This notice also serves as a final
Assessment Rates reminder to importers of their July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016.
Therefore, we are rescinding this
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff responsibility under 19 CFR
administrative review.
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018.
19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has regarding the reimbursement of
determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties prior to liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
antidumping duties on all appropriate of the relevant entries during this Baker, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
entries of subject merchandise in review period. Failure to comply with Enforcement and Compliance,
accordance with the final results of this this requirement could result in the International Trade Administration,
review. Commerce intends to issue Secretary’s presumption that U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
reimbursement of the antidumping
after the publication date of the final DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2924.
duties occurred and the subsequent
results of this review. Commerce SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
assessment of double antidumping
intends to instruct CBP to liquidate any duties. Background
entries of subject merchandise exported
during this POR by Decca and the other This notice also serves as a reminder On August 7, 2017, Commerce
three companies noted above which did to parties subject to administrative published the Preliminary Results of
not qualify for separate rate status, at the protective orders (APOs) of their this review in the Federal Register.1 We
China-wide rate. responsibility concerning the return or invited parties to comment on the
Additionally, pursuant to Commerce’s destruction of proprietary information Preliminary Results. On September 6,
practice in NME cases, if there are any disclosed under APO in accordance 2017, we received case briefs from
suspended entries of subject with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues petitioners American Italian Pasta
merchandise during the POR under the to govern business proprietary Company, Dakota Growers Pasta
case numbers of the eight companies information in this segment of the Company, and New World Pasta
that claimed no shipments of subject proceeding. Timely written notification Company (the petitioners) and from the
merchandise, they will be liquidated at of the return/destruction of APO respondent, Mutlu. On September 19,
the China-wide rate.11 materials or conversion to judicial 2017, we received rebuttal briefs from
protective order is hereby requested. the petitioners and Mutlu. On
Cash Deposit Requirements
Failure to comply with the regulations September 21, 2017, Commerce rejected
The following cash deposit Mutlu’s case brief because it contained
requirements will be effective upon and terms of an APO is a violation that
new factual information after the
publication of the final results of this is subject to sanction.
deadline for such information.2 Mutlu
administrative review for shipments of This notice of the final results of this subsequently removed the new factual
subject merchandise from China antidumping duty administrative review information from its case brief, and
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, is issued and published in accordance resubmitted the case brief on September
for consumption on or after the with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 23, 2017.
publication date in the Federal Register Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR Commerce exercised its discretion to
of the final results of this review, as 351.221(b)(5). toll deadlines affected by the closure of
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the the Federal Government from January
Act: (1) For previously investigated or Dated: January 24, 2018.
20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline
reviewed China and non-China Christian Marsh,
falls on a non-business day, in
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

exporters which are not under review in Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement accordance with Commerce’s practice,
this segment of the proceeding but and Compliance.
which received a separate rate in a prior [FR Doc. 2018–02896 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] 1 See Certain Pasta from Turkey: Preliminary

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
11 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Review, 82 FR 36737 (August 7, 2017) (Preliminary
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Memorandum.
(October 24, 2011). 2 See Commerce Letter dated September 21, 2017.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-14 03:58:56
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 03:58:56

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Applicable February 14, 2018.
Contact		Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1593.
FR Citation		83 FR 6515

83 FR 6515 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 31 (February 14, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration