83 FR 6966 - Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 33 (February 16, 2018)

Page Range		6966-6968
FR Document		2018-03239

The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for all navigable waters on Pensacola Bay within 500 yards of the construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL. The purpose of the safety zone is to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by work performed during the construction of the new bridge located across the Pensacola Bay. This rulemaking restricts speed to an idle speed or slowest safe speed for all vessels, mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 33 (Friday, February 16, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6966-6968]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0998]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for all 
navigable waters on Pensacola Bay within 500 yards of the construction 
of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL. The purpose of the 
safety zone is to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment from potential hazards created by work performed during the 
construction of the new bridge located across the Pensacola Bay. This 
rulemaking restricts speed to an idle speed or slowest safe speed for 
all vessels, mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from February 16, 
2018 until December 31, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual 
notice will be used from February 7, 2018 until February 16, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile, 
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 251-441-
5940, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The construction 
of the Pensacola Bay Bridge has advanced to the phase requiring the 
presence of vessels, barges, and cranes that are now working in and 
around the main navigation channel and other areas frequently navigated 
by recreational vessels. Hazards associated with this phase of the 
construction include accidental falling debris, submerged objects, 
collision, allision, and other navigational hazards. It is 
impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety 
zone immediately to prevent injury to persons and vessels and lack 
sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and then 
consider those comments before issuing the rule.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the 
reasons stated above, the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for 
making it effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal 
Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be contrary to 
public interest because of the potential safety hazards associated with 
the work.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with the bridge work that is currently 
ongoing will be a safety concern for anyone within 500 yards of the 
construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge. This rule is needed to 
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable

[[Page 6967]]

waters within the safety zone while the bridge work is being completed.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone effective from 
February 7, 2018 until December 31, 2020 on Pensacola within 500 yards 
of the construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge in Pensacola, FL. 
The safety zone is needed to protect life and property from the hazards 
associated with the construction of the new bridge on Pensacola Bay. 
This rulemaking restricts speed to an idle speed or slowest safe speed 
for all vessels, mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized 
by the COTP or a designated representative. The duration of the zone is 
intended to ensure the safety of people and vessels on these navigable 
waters during the construction of the new bridge.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on size, location, 
and duration of the rulemaking. This safety zone will be in place 
within 500 yards of the construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge 
until the estimated completion of the bridge on December 31, 2020. 
Vessels are permitted to enter the safety zone, but must do so at idle 
or the slowest safe speed. Additionally, the Coast Guard will issue 
Broadcast Notices to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
regulation so that waterway users may plan accordingly for transits 
during this restriction.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under executive order 13132, 
federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the states, on the 
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in executive order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under executive 
order 13175, consultation and coordination with Indian Tribal 
governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal 
government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the federal government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a state, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This rule involves safety zone within 
500 yards of the construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge on 
Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL. It is categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction 
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration 
supporting this determination is available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to

[[Page 6968]]

coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received 
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or 
vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
Recordkeeping Requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0998 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0998  Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
navigable waters of the Pensacola Bay within 500 yards of the 
construction of the new Pensacola Bay Bridge.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from February 
7, 2018 through December 31, 2020.
    (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, persons and vessels entering this safety zone must 
transit at idle or the slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful 
directions issued by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a 
designated representative.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as 
well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: February 7, 2018.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2018-03239 Filed 2-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

6966 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

review under paragraph L60(a) of contacted on VHF–FM channel 16 or by I. Table of Abbreviations
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction telephone at 251–441–5976. CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev.01. A (4) Persons and vessels permitted to COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
Record of Environmental Consideration enter this safety zone must transit at DHS Department of Homeland Security
(REC) supporting this determination is their slowest safe speed and comply FR Federal Register
available in the docket where indicated with all lawful directions issued by the NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
under ADDRESSES. COTP or the designated representative. § Section
(d) Informational broadcasts. The U.S.C. United States Code
G. Protest Activities
COTP or a designated representative II. Background Information and
The Coast Guard respects the First will inform the public through Regulatory History
Amendment rights of protesters. broadcast notices to mariners of the
Protesters are asked to contact the enforcement period for the safety zone. The Coast Guard is issuing this
person listed in the FOR FURTHER temporary rule without prior notice and
Dated: February 9, 2018.
INFORMATION CONTACT section to opportunity to comment pursuant to
M.R. Mclellan,
coordinate protest activities so that your authority under section 4(a) of the
message can be received without Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
Port Sector Mobile.
jeopardizing the safety or security of U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
people, places or vessels. [FR Doc. 2018–03228 Filed 2–15–18; 8:45 am]
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P without prior notice and opportunity to
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
comment when the agency for good
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation cause finds that those procedures are
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
requirements, Security measures, SECURITY
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
Waterways. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
Coast Guard
For the reasons discussed in the good cause exists for not publishing a
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 33 CFR Part 165 notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
CFR part 165 as follows: with respect to this rule because it is
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0998] impracticable. The construction of the
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Pensacola Bay Bridge has advanced to
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS the phase requiring the presence of
RIN 1625–AA00
vessels, barges, and cranes that are now
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, working in and around the main
continues to read as follows:
Pensacola, FL navigation channel and other areas
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; frequently navigated by recreational
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. vessels. Hazards associated with this
Department of Homeland Security Delegation ACTION: Temporary final rule. phase of the construction include
No. 0170.1.
accidental falling debris, submerged
■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0061 to read as SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is objects, collision, allision, and other
follows: establishing a safety zone for all navigational hazards. It is impracticable
navigable waters on Pensacola Bay to publish an NPRM because we must
§ 165.T08–0061 Safety Zone; Santa Rosa within 500 yards of the construction of
Sound, Pensacola Beach, FL. establish this safety zone immediately to
the new Pensacola Bay Bridge in prevent injury to persons and vessels
(a) Location. The following area is a Pensacola, FL. The purpose of the safety and lack sufficient time to provide a
safety zone: All navigable waters within zone is to protect personnel, vessels, reasonable comment period and then
a 500 yard radius of the Kokosing Cable and the marine environment from consider those comments before issuing
Lay Barge located between positions potential hazards created by work the rule.
30°21′26.0″ N, 87°09′13.0″ W and performed during the construction of
30°20′04.7″ N, 87°08′20.8″ W on the We are issuing this rule, and under 5
the new bridge located across the
Santa Rosa Sound, Pensacola Beach, FL. U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the reasons
Pensacola Bay. This rulemaking restricts
(b) Enforcement period. This section stated above, the Coast Guard finds that
speed to an idle speed or slowest safe
will be enforced from February 10, 2018 good cause exists for making it effective
speed for all vessels, mariners, and
through March 30, 2018. less than 30 days after publication in the
persons unless specifically authorized
(c) Regulations. (1) The general Federal Register. Delaying the effective
by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
regulations contained in § 165.23 as date of this rule would be contrary to
(COTP) or a designated representative.
well as the regulations in this section public interest because of the potential
DATES: This rule is effective without safety hazards associated with the work.
apply to the regulated area.
actual notice from February 16, 2018
(2) Entry into this zone is prohibited III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
until December 31, 2020. For the
unless authorized by the Captain of the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a
will be used from February 7, 2018 until under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
designated representative. A designated
February 16, 2018. Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
representative is a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If (COTP) has determined that potential
you have questions about this hazards associated with the bridge work
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

Coast Guard assigned to units under the
operational control of USCG Sector rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant that is currently ongoing will be a safety
Mobile. Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile, concern for anyone within 500 yards of
(3) Persons or vessels seeking to enter Waterways Management Division, U.S. the construction of the new Pensacola
into or transit through the zone must Coast Guard; telephone 251–441–5940, Bay Bridge. This rule is needed to
request permission from the COTP or a email Kyle.D.Berry@uscg.mil. protect personnel, vessels, and the
designated representative. They may be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: marine environment in the navigable

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Feb 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM 16FER1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 6967

waters within the safety zone while the B. Impact on Small Entities power and responsibilities among the
bridge work is being completed. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that order and
IV. Discussion of the Rule have determined that it is consistent
requires federal agencies to consider the
This rule establishes a temporary potential impact of regulations on small with the fundamental federalism
safety zone effective from February 7, entities during rulemaking. The term principles and preemption requirements
2018 until December 31, 2020 on ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small described in executive order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
Pensacola within 500 yards of the businesses, not-for-profit organizations
implications under executive order
construction of the new Pensacola Bay that are independently owned and
13175, consultation and coordination
Bridge in Pensacola, FL. The safety zone operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal governments,
is needed to protect life and property fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial
from the hazards associated with the with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian
construction of the new bridge on The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the
Pensacola Bay. This rulemaking restricts 605(b) that this rule will not have a federal government and Indian tribes, or
speed to an idle speed or slowest safe significant economic impact on a on the distribution of power and
speed for all vessels, mariners, and substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the federal
persons unless specifically authorized While some owners or operators of government and Indian tribes. If you
by the COTP or a designated vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for
representative. The duration of the zone zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
is intended to ensure the safety of reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR
people and vessels on these navigable rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
waters during the construction of the economic impact on any vessel owner above.
new bridge. or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
V. Regulatory Analyses Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
We developed this rule after we want to assist small entities in
considering numerous statutes and federal agencies to assess the effects of
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
executive orders related to rulemaking. would affect your small business,
Below we summarize our analyses particular, the Act addresses actions
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
based on a number of these statutes and jurisdiction and you have questions state, local, or tribal government, in the
executive orders, and we discuss First concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
Amendment rights of protestors. compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
A. Regulatory Planning and Review listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
CONTACT section. will not result in such expenditure, we
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Small businesses may send comments do discuss the effects of this rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and on the actions of federal employees who elsewhere in this preamble.
benefits of available regulatory enforce, or otherwise determine
alternatives and, if regulation is compliance with, federal regulations to F. Environment
necessary, to select regulatory the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
approaches that maximize net benefits. Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01, which
to control regulatory costs through a Regulatory Fairness Boards. The guides the Coast Guard in complying
budgeting process. This rule has not Ombudsman evaluates these actions with the National Environmental Policy
been designated a ‘‘significant annually and rates each agency’s Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
regulatory action,’’ under Executive responsiveness to small business. If you have determined that this action is one
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has wish to comment on actions by of a category of actions that do not
not been reviewed by the Office of employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– individually or cumulatively have a
Management and Budget (OMB), and 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The significant effect on the human
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt Coast Guard will not retaliate against environment. This rule involves safety
from the requirements of Executive small entities that question or complain zone within 500 yards of the
Order 13771. about this rule or any policy or action construction of the new Pensacola Bay
of the Coast Guard. Bridge on Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL.
This regulatory action determination It is categorically excluded from further
is based on size, location, and duration C. Collection of Information
review under paragraph L60(a) of
of the rulemaking. This safety zone will This rule will not call for a new Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
be in place within 500 yards of the collection of information under the Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
construction of the new Pensacola Bay Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Record of Environmental Consideration
Bridge until the estimated completion of U.S.C. 3501–3520). supporting this determination is
the bridge on December 31, 2020. available in the docket where indicated
Vessels are permitted to enter the safety D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments under ADDRESSES.
zone, but must do so at idle or the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

slowest safe speed. Additionally, the A rule has implications for federalism G. Protest Activities
Coast Guard will issue Broadcast under executive order 13132, The Coast Guard respects the First
Notices to Mariners via VHF–FM marine federalism, if it has a substantial direct Amendment rights of protesters.
channel 16 about the regulation so that effect on the states, on the relationship Protesters are asked to contact the
waterway users may plan accordingly between the national government and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
for transits during this restriction. the states, or on the distribution of INFORMATION CONTACT section to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Feb 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM 16FER1

Document Created: 2018-02-16 00:55:26
Document Modified: 2018-02-16 00:55:26

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from February 16, 2018 until December 31, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from February 7, 2018 until February 16, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 251-441- 5940, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 6966
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 6966 - Safety Zone; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 33 (February 16, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard